Chapter 3. Module 1
Chapter 3. Module 1
Focused Discussions
INTODUCTION:
The social institution that has one of the biggest impacts on society is the
economy. You might think of the economy in terms of number-number of
unemployment, gross domestic product (GDP), or whatever the stock market is doing
today. While we often talk about it in numerical terms, the economy is composed of
people. It is the social institution that organizes all production, consumption, and trade
of goods in the society. There are many ways in which product can be made,
exchanged, and used. Think about capitalism or socialism. This economic system and
the economic revolutions that created them shape the way people live their lives.
Economic systems vary from one society to another. But in any given economy,
production typically splits into three sectors. The primary sector extracts raw materials
from natural environments. Workers from farmers miner fit well in the primary sector.
The secondary sectors gain the raw materials and transforms them into manufactured
goods. This means, for example that someone from the primary sector extracts oil from
the earth then someone from the secondary sector refines the petroleum to gasoline.
Whereas, the tertiary sector involves services rather than goods. It offers services by
doing things rather than making things. Thus, economic system is more complicated or
at least, more sophisticated than the way things used to be for much of human history.
This chapter will show the contributions of the different financial and economic
institutions that facilitated the growth of the global economy. The history of the global
market will be discussed by looking at the different economic revolution. The growth and
dynamics of multinational corporation that are emerging in today’s world economy will
also be examined.
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), signed in 1947 by 23 countries,
is a treaty minimizing barriers to international trade by eliminating or reducing quotas,
tariffs, and subsidies. It was intended to boost economic recovery after World War II.1
GATT was expanded and refined over the years, leading to the creation in 1995 of
the World Trade Organization (WTO), which absorbed the organization created to
implement GATT. By then, 125 nations were signatories to its agreements, which
covered about 90% of global trade.
The GATT was created to form rules to end or restrict the most costly and undesirable
features of the prewar protectionist period, namely quantitative trade barriers such as
trade controls and quotas. The agreement also provided a system to arbitrate
commercial disputes among nations, and the framework enabled a number of
multilateral negotiations for the reduction of tariff barriers. The GATT was regarded as
a significant success in the postwar years.
One of the key achievements of the GATT was that of trade without discrimination.
Every signatory member of the GATT was to be treated as equal to any other. This is
known as the most-favored-nation principle , and it has been carried through into the
WTO. A practical outcome of this was that once a country had negotiated a tariff cut
with some other countries (usually its most important trading partners), this same cut
would automatically apply to all GATT signatories. Escape clauses did exist, whereby
countries could negotiate exceptions if their domestic producers would be particularly
harmed by tariff cuts.
Most nations adopted the most-favored-nation principle in setting tariffs, which largely
replaced quotas. Tariffs (preferable to quotas but still a trade barrier) were, in turn, cut
steadily in rounds of successive negotiations.
Why was the GATT replaced by the World Trade Organization (WTO)?
The GATT, though largely successful in its goal, was said to lack a coherent
institutional structure. In short, it was a legal agreement acting as an international
organization. The World Trade Organization (WTO) incorporates the principles of the
GATT and is better positioned to carry them out because, among other things, it is
better versed in issues like intellectual property, has a faster dispute settlement
system, and wields more power.
IMF and the world Bank were founded after the world war II. Their establishment
was mainly because of peace advocacy after the war. These institutions aimed to help
the economic stability of the world. Both of them are basically banks but instead of
being started by individuals like regular banks, they were started by countries. Most of
the world’s countries were members of the two institution. But, of course, the richest
countries were those who handled most of the financing and ultimately, those who had
the greatest influence.
IMF and the world Bank were designed to complement each other. The IMF’s
main goal was to help countries which were in trouble at that time and who could not
obtain money by any means. Perhaps, their economy collapsed or their currency was
threatened. IMF, in this case, served as a lender or a last resort for countries which
needed financial assistance. For instance, yemen loan 93 million dollar form IMF on
April 5, 2012 to address its struggle with terrorism. The World Bank, in comparison,
had a more long-term approach. Its main goals revolved around the eradication of
poverty and it funded specific projects that helped them reach their goals, especially in
poor countries. An example of such is their investment in education since 1962 in
developing nations like Bangladesh, Chad, and Afgahnistan.
Unfortunately, the reputation of these institution has been dwindling, mainly due
to practices such as lending the corrupt government or even dictators and imposing
ineffective austerity measures to get their money back.
3. What were the key institutions and purposes of the Bretton Woods system at its
inception? How did they evolve during the post-war years? In what ways have
they become obsolete or counterproductive today?
END OF MODULE 4