Etm Micro Project
Etm Micro Project
District cooling is the cooling equivalent of district heating. Working on broadly similar
principles to district heating, district cooling delivers chilled water to buildings like offices
and factories needing cooling. In winter, the source for the cooling can often be seawater, so
it is a cheaper resource than using electricity to run compressors for cooling. Alternatively,
District Cooling can be provided by a Heat Sharing Network which enables each building on
the circuit to use a heat pump to reject heat to an ambient ground temperature circuit.
There are also 5th generation district heating and cooling systems (so called cold district
heating networks) that are able to provide both heating and cooling simultaneously. In these
systems the waste heat from chillers can be recycled and used for space heating or hot water
production.
Benefits of DCS
Energy Saving
DCS is a very energy-efficient cooling solution as it takes full advantage of economy of
scale, diversity in cooling demand for different buildings, and high standard of plant
operation and maintenance. Although energy saving arising from DCS varies according to
the DCS configuration, such as length of distribution pipework’s, heat rejection method
and other plant efficiency improvement schemes, a typical saving of around 35% and
20% can be achieved when compared with traditional air-cooled air-conditioning systems
and individual water-cooled air-conditioning systems using cooling towers respectively.
Besides, computerised energy management system in the chiller plant will monitor and
manage chilled water supply to users ensuring stable supply of cooling at all times.
Costs Saving
A district cooling system allows the building owner to eliminate their on-site chiller operation
and maintenance. By doing this, the building owner no longer needs to operate and maintain
chillers, and replace chillers at the end of their life cycles. Therefore, building owners using
DCS can minimize the capital investment and the subsequent maintenance costs for their air-
conditioning plants.
Disadvantages of DCS:
Depending on the central plants, DCSs may not totally be environmentally friendly as
long-term use of the free cooling sources such as sea or lake might affect the temperature
of the sources and limit the cooling capacity if no anticipating measures are considered. It
also could affect the ecosystem of the sources.
A free cooling system uses a vast amount of water, which is a problem in areas lacking
water.
Heat loss within the plant itself as well as the building serviced by the DHC due to
distribution losses in pipes and heat exchangers is inevitable
Selection of a system that shows large environmental benefits may, in fact, end up not
being economical as both the environmental and economic aspects have to be considered
together.
High initial investment costs and lack of negotiable prices and tariffs from the customer’s
side as DCS are often owned by few local energy companies, and there is a risk of
monopoly for the cooling prices and tariffs.