1 Lecture in Arson
1 Lecture in Arson
1. One (1) or more buildings or edifices, consequent to one single act of burning,
or as a result of simultaneous burnings, or committed on several or different occasions.
The penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall also be imposed upon any
person who shall burn:
1. Any arsenal, shipyard, storehouse or military powder or fireworks factory,
ordnance, storehouse, archives or general museum of the Government.
Sec. 1. Arson.—Any person who burns or sets fire to the property of another shall be
punished by prision mayor.
The same penalty shall be imposed when a person sets fire to his own property
under circumstances which expose to danger the life or property of another.
Sec. 2 was repealed by R.A. 7659.
Sec. 5. Where Death Results From Arson.—If by reason of or on the occasion of arson
death results, the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed.
1. If the fire started simultaneously in more than one part of the building or
establishment.
4. If the building or property is insured for substantially more than its actual value at the
time of the issuance of the policy.
5. If during the lifetime of the corresponding fire insurance policy more than two fires
have occurred in the same or other premises owned or under the control of the offender
and/or insured.
6. If shortly before the fire, a substantial portion of the effects insured and stored in a
building or property had been withdrawn from the premises except in the ordinary
course of business.
7. If a demand for money or other valuable consideration was made before the fire in
exchange for the desistance of the offender or for the safety of the person or property of
the victim.
Sec. 7. Conspiracy to Commit Arson.---Conspiracy to commit arson shall be punished
by prision mayor in its minimum period.
WHAT IS ARSON?
Example: MM, the house servant wanted to go home for a vacation. She asked
permission from her but it was not granted. So, MM got mad and, as a revenge, she
burned the house at night and left. However, the master and his family were not
awakened and they all died. Five other houses nearby were also burned. What crime
did MM commit?
MM committed simple arson or other cases of arson because the structure that
was burned is an inhabited house and not a building.
The death of the master and his family will qualify the arson into the penalty of
reclusion perpetua to death.
Example: Using the same situation above, let us say that the intention of MM is to kill
her master. What crime did MM commit?
Example: Using the same situation above, let us say that the intention of MM was to
destroy the house and she did not know that the master and his family were inside the
house because she knew that they were all went out. What crime did MM commit?
MM committed simple arson but the penalty is reclusion perpetua to death due
of the death of the master and his family.
Example: BB was sleeping when he was killed by DD. In order to hide the crime, DD
burned the house. What crime/s did DD commit?
DD committed 2 crimes.
First, is murder because he killed BB while sleeping and such act is considered
treachery.
Second, is destructive arson because committed another crime to conceal the murder.
Please take note that when the intention of the offender in burning the structure
is to conceal the evidence of another violation of law, the crime committed is
destructive arson. Here, the structure can be a building or house.
Example: GG burned the sugarcane plantation of TT. What crime did GG commit?
Example: Using the same situation above, let us say that while the plantation is
burning, a field worker, who was sleeping, died. What crime did GG commit?
Example: XX wanted to burn the house of BB. So what he did was to buy gasoline.
Then he went to BB’s house carrying the gasoline and poured it. But when he was
about to light the match, someone saw him and he was arrested. What crime did
XX commit?
In People vs. Baluntong (GR No. 182061, 03/15/2010 citing People vs. Malingan,
503 SCRA 294), the Supreme Court held:
“In cases where both burning and death occur, in order to determine what
crime/crimes was/were perpetrated—whether arson, murder or arson and
homicide/murder, it is de rigueur to ascertain the main objective of the malefactor:
(a) if the main objective is the burning of the building or edifice, but death results by
reason or on the occasion of arson, the crime is simply arson, and the resulting
homicide is absorbed;
(b) if, on the other hand, the main objective is to kill a particular person who may be in a
building or edifice, when fire is resorted to as the means to accomplish such goal the
crime committed is murder only;
(c) lastly, if the objective is, likewise, to kill a particular person, and in fact the offender
has already done so (has killed the victim), but fire is resorted to as a means to cover up
the killing, then there are two separate and distinct crimes committed---homicide/murder
and arson. (See The Revised Penal Code, Book 2, Reyes, pp. 1109-1110)