XXX The Influence of Viral Marketing Through Tiktok On Consumers' Attitude at Shopee PDF
XXX The Influence of Viral Marketing Through Tiktok On Consumers' Attitude at Shopee PDF
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Viral Marketing
Shopee dalam video TikTok terhadap sikap konsumen di Shopee.
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan bagaimana
Informativeness, Entertainment, Irritation, Credibility video viral
marketing Shopee di TikTok dan pengaruhnya terhadap sikap
konsumen dalam video tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode
kuantitatif dengan tujuan deskriptif - kausal. Non-probability sampling
digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan jenis purposive sampling.
Jumlah responden sebanyak 275 orang. Teknik analisis data yang
digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif dan analisis SEM-PLS
menggunakan Sm artPLS 3.0. Berdasarkan hasil analisis deskriptif
Informativeness, Entertainment, dan Credibility berada pada kategori
baik, sedangkan Irritation berada pada kategori kurang baik. Sedangkan
variabel sikap konsumen berada pada kategori baik. Hasil analisis SEM-
PLS menunjukkan bahwa Informativeness, Entertainment, dan
Credibility berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap sikap konsumen,
sedangkan Irritation tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap sikap
konsumen.
JGBMR 67
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
TikTok have positive and negative Sohail (2012), viral marketing is a sort of
attitudes. A lot of research has been done marketing that infects customers with an
in the field of marketing management to advertising message that spreads like a flu
see how attitudes are developed and how virus from one customer to the next.
they evolve over time (Sandhe & Joshi, According to Krishnamurthy in Tandijaya
2017). Consumer attitude is a trained & Semuel (2021), the goal of viral
inclination to behave consistently marketing is to speed up the
favorably or unfavorably toward a specific communication process by using
object (Schiffman & Wisenblit, 2015, p. consumer-to-consumer (or peer-to-peer)
172). Consumers are motivated to buy or communication to broadcast information
not buy specific products or brands based about a product or service. People are
on their attitudes toward the attitude typically willing to share viral marketing
object, which can be positive or negative messages with their social networks,
(Schiffman & Wisenblit, 2015, p. 172). potentially increasing message
The object in this research is the Shopee’s trustworthiness in the eyes of message
TikTok video that went viral. In short, recipients (Zernigah & Sohail, 2012). The
viewers are showing their consumers’ dimension of Viral Marketing strategies
attitude in the comment section as their are Informativeness, Entertainment,
react to Shopee's Viral Marketing TikTok Irritation, and Credibility (Zernigah &
video. Sohail, 2012).
The more often Shopee and TikTok users Dimensions of Viral Marketing
follow trends, challenges, and hashtags, The first dimension is Informativeness.
the greater the possibility that TikTok
According to Wang & Lan (2018),
videos will go viral (Detik, 2021). informativeness can change the
Therefore, Shopee is also taking
recognition, attitudes, satisfaction, and
advantage of TikTok in new ways, by influence of the resources provided, the
creating video that has the potential to go
public's sense of informativeness is
viral by implementing a viral marketing
viewed as an assessment of whether all of
strategy (Redcomm, 2021).
the information they receive is valuable or
Consumers' attitudes toward viral useless. Followed by Entertainment.
marketing are usually gauged by how they According to Rukuni, et al. (2017),
react to marketing messages, which are entertainment is intended at the level of
evaluated for their informativeness, enjoyment that can be provided by stimuli,
entertainment, irritation, and credibility such as advertising through humor
(Zernigah & Sohail, 2012). Consumers (comedy) and pleasure. Followed by
can have both a positive and negative Irritation. The level of annoyance or
attitude toward viral marketing message, discomfort induced by the stimuli in the
according to research (Zernigah & Sohail, marketing message is referred to as
2012). irritation (Rukuni et al., 2017). Last,
followed by Credibility. According to
LITERATURE REVIEW AND
Ohanian in Wang & Lan (2018),
DEVELOPMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
credibility relates to the recipient's trust in
Viral Marketing the source of information.
Viral marketing is one of the most current Consumers’ Attitude
strategies for promoting products and
Consumer attitude is a trained inclination
services via the use of interactive
to behave consistently favorably or
technology (Zernigah & Sohail, 2012).
unfavorably toward a specific object
According to Palka, et al. in Zernigah &
JGBMR 68
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
JGBMR 69
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
5 = Strongly Agree (Sekaran & Bougie, This study is carried out using
2016, p. 207). The numerical scores would questionnaires. The researcher used
have to be reversed if a statement was Google Forms to collect data for this
phrased negatively (Zikmund et al., 2013, study. The writers used and changed
p. 316). questionnaire items from earlier studies
that had been published in respectable and
Population, Sample, and Sampling certified international or national
Method publications. The previous studies are
(Trivedi, 2017), (Zernigah & Sohail,
The population in this study are all 2012), (Kim & Han, 2014), (Yunita et al.,
Indonesian citizens who are users or have 2019), (Sari et al., 2020), (Logan et al.,
used TikTok and have seen Viral 2012), (Salem, 2016), (Gao & Zang,
Marketing content from Shopee. Because 2016), (Sandhe & Joshi, 2017), (Cao et al.,
the precise number of people in the 2020), (Huang et al., 2019), and (Rukuni
population is unknown, the Cochran et al., 2017). Therefore, here are the
formula is used to calculate the fraction of operational variables that researcher uses
the total number of samples. This study in this study:
will use 95% confidence level, significant
level of 0.05, and the z value is 1.65 Table 1. Operational Variable
because this study uses a one-tailed
Dimensions Items on this Research Item Code
hypothesis. In this study, p is 0.5, and the Viral Marketing (Independent Variable)
I think viral marketing messages from Shopee’s
formula for calculating q is q = (1-p). As a TikTok videos are a good source of up-to-date IF1
product information.
result, q has a value of 0.5 with error rate I think Shopee’s TikTok video marketing
IF2
messages are informative.
0.05. The following is the Cochran Informativeness (IF) I think Shopee’s TikTok video provides useful
IF3
information about products.
formula used in this study (Cochran, I think Shopee’s TikTok video provides useful
IF4
information about services.
1963:75): I think Shopee’s TikTok video is an important
IF5
source of information.
I think consuming viral marketing messages
EN1
from Shopee’s TikTok video is exciting.
I think the element of humor and fun makes
EN2
Shopee’s TikTok video entertaining.
Entertainment (EN) I think that Shopee’s TikTok video is
EN3
interesting.
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is cool. EN4
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is more
EN5
enjoyable than other media content.
The following results are obtained: I think marketing messages on Shopee’s TikTok
video are irritating.
IR1
I think that Shopee’s TikTok video is intrusive. IR2
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is irritating as
IR3
Irritation (IR) the information provided is misleading.
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is irritating as
IR4
the information provided is unreliable.
I think Shopee’s TikTok video can insult
IR5
people’s intelligence.
I think that I trust the information provided by
CR1
Shopee’s TikTok video.
I think I am impressed by the Shopee’s TikTok
CR2
video.
I think Shopee’s TikTok video provides
Credibility (CR) CR3
Therefore, the sample of respondents that appropriate evidence to believe.
I think receiving Shopee’s TikTok video has no
CR4
authored need is 275 samples. The author risk.
I think Shopee’s video on TikTok are a good
CR5
has established various particular sample reference source when buying a product.
Consumers’ Attitude (Dependent Variable)
requirements, including the following I think Shopee’s TikTok video has a good
quality.
CG1
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is safe to
sample criteria: respondents are an Cognitive (CG)
consume.
CG2
I think Shopee’s TikTok video helps me to get
Indonesian citizen age between 18-34 information more conveniently.
CG3
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is generally
years old, use or have used the TikTok good.
AF1
I think Shopee’s TikTok video is appealing.
social media app, and have seen Shopee's Affective (AF)
I think that watching Shopee’s TikTok video is
AF2
AF3
Viral Marketing on TikTok. fun.
I think that I will definitely buy the product in
CN1
Shopee’s TikTok video.
I think that I will recommend the product in
CN2
Data Collection Method Conative (CN) Shopee’s TikTok video.
I think that viral marketing of Shopee’s TikTok
CN3
video convinces me to buy more of its products.
JGBMR 70
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
The frequency distribution in this study is A total of 283 responses were collected
represented by a five-interval Likert scale: during the data collection process, which
strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, began and was completed in January
and highly agree. The questionnaire that is 2022. After distributing the
provided provides five options for the questionnaires, the researchers managed
responder to pick from, and then an to get 275 valid respondents. Table 3 will
assessment criterion is created for each explain the characteristics of respondents
question item based on a percentage using based on their gender and age.
the methods below according to
(Riduwan, 2012): (a) The entire value of Table 3. Respondents Characteristics
each statement, which is the answer of all Gender Respondents Percentage
respondents, is the cumulative value, (b) Male 84 30.55%
Female 191 69.45%
percentage is an item cumulative score is Total 275 100.00%
divided by frequency score, then Age Respondents Percentage
18 – 22 years old 203 73.82%
multiplied by 100%, (c) the number of 22 – 26 years old 49 17.82%
respondents is 275 people with the largest 26 – 30 years old 19 6.91%
measurement scale value is 5 and the 30 – 34 years old 4 1.45%
Total 275 100.00%
smallest measurement scale is 1.
Based on Table 3, it can be concluded that
So, that:
female respondents contributed more to
this study's participation and the majority
a. The largest cumulative number = 275 x
of TikTok users in Indonesia who have
5 = 1375
JGBMR 71
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
SD D N A SA
Item
1 2 3 4 5
Total Total Score Ideal Score Category According to Rukuni, et al. (2017),
IF1
P
%
1
0.36%
8
2.91%
41 115 110
14.91% 41.82% 40.00%
275
100.00%
1150
83.64%
1375 Good entertainment is intended at the level of
IF2
P
%
0
0.00%
9
3.27%
52 127
18.91% 46.18% 31.64%
87 275
100.00%
1117
81.24%
1375 Good enjoyment that can be provided by stimuli,
IF3
P
%
1
0.36%
12
4.36%
58 105
21.09% 38.18% 36.00%
99 275
100.00%
1114
81.02%
1375 Good such as advertising through humor
IF4
P 1 11 58 126 79 275 1096
1375 Good (comedy) and pleasure. The entertainment
% 0.36% 4.00% 21.09% 45.82% 28.73% 100.00% 79.71%
IF5
P 9 30 62 99 75 275 1026
1375 Good
dimension is categorized as “Good” in the
% 3.27% 10.91%22.55% 36.00% 27.27% 100.00% 74.62%
Total Average Score 1100.6 assessment summary. Based on Table 5,
Total Average Percentage 80.04% Good
Overall Total Score 5503 all the five items are categorized as
“Good”. Item EN2 is the item that got the
The amount of information conveyed in a highest percentage with a score of
message is referred to as informativeness 81.67%, which means respondents are
(Rukuni et al., 2017). The informativeness agree that elements of humor and fun
dimension is categorized as “Good” in the make TikTok Shopee videos entertaining.
assessment summary. Based on Table 4, Meanwhile, the EN5 item shows the
all the five items are categorized as lowest value, which is 68.29% (although it
“Good”. Item IF1 is the item that got the is still classified as "Good"). Item EN5
highest percentage with a score of explains respondents are agree that
83.64%, which means respondents agree Shopee TikTok videos are more fun than
that viral marketing messages from any other media content. EN5 has the
Shopee's Viral Marketing TikTok videos greatest number of respondents who
are a good source of current product answered strongly disagree as many as 19
information. Meanwhile, the IF5 item respondents, disagree as many as 44
shows the lowest value, which is 74.62% people, and neutral as many as 77 people.
(although it is still classified as "Good").
Item IF5 explains respondents are agree In conclusion, according to respondents
that the information in Shopee's Viral Shopee's Viral Marketing TikTok video
Marketing TikTok video is an important delivered good entertainment to its
source of information. IF5 has the greatest viewers.
number of respondents who answered
strongly disagree as many as 9 Table 6. Irritation
respondents, disagree as many as 30
people, and neutral as many as 62 people.
JGBMR 72
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
SA A N D SD SD D N A SA
Item Total Total Score Ideal Score Category Item Total Total Score Ideal Score Category
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
P 17 45 79 67 67 275 947 P 7 23 104 88 53 275 982
IR1 1375 Not Good CR1 1375 Good
% 6.18% 16.36%28.73% 24.36% 24.36% 100.00% 68.87% % 2.55% 8.36% 37.82% 32.00% 19.27% 100.00% 71.42%
P 16 46 72 74 67 275 955 P 6 25 79 111 54 275 1007
IR2 1375 Not Good CR2 1375 Good
% 5.82% 16.73%26.18% 26.91% 24.36% 100.00% 69.45% % 2.18% 9.09% 28.73% 40.36% 19.64% 100.00% 73.24%
P 15 39 59 61 101 275 1019 P 3 31 93 92 56 275 992
IR3 1375 Not Good CR3 1375 Good
% 5.45% 14.18%21.45% 22.18% 36.73% 100.00% 74.11% % 1.09% 11.27%33.82% 33.45% 20.36% 100.00% 72.15%
P 14 42 60 70 89 275 1003 P 4 32 68 98 73 275 1029
IR4 1375 Not Good CR4 1375 Good
% 5.09% 15.27%21.82% 25.45% 32.36% 100.00% 72.95% % 1.45% 11.64%24.73% 35.64% 26.55% 100.00% 74.84%
P 20 38 48 65 104 275 1020 P 4 26 65 89 91 275 1062
CR5 1375 Good
IR5 1375 Not Good % 1.45% 9.45%23.64% 32.36% 33.09% 100.00% 77.24%
% 7.27% 13.82%17.45% 23.64% 37.82% 100.00% 74.18%
Total Average Score 1014.4
Total Average Score 988.8
Total Average Percentage 73.77% Good
Total Average Percentage 71.91% Not Good
Overall Total Score 5072
Overall Total Score 4944
The items in irritation are mentioned According to Ohanian in Wang & Lan
negatively. The numerical scores would (2018), credibility relates to the recipient's
have to be reversed if a statement was trust in the source of information. The
phrased negatively (Zikmund et al., 2013, credibility dimension is categorized as
p. 316). This is accomplished by reversing “Good” in the assessment summary.
the negative item's coding, such that a high Based on Table 7, all the five items are
level of agreement really reflects an categorized as “Good”. Item CR5 is the
unfavorable answer rather than a positive item that got the highest percentage with a
attitude, and vice versa (Zikmund et al., score of 77.24%, which means
2013, p. 316). So it will be, 1 = Strongly respondents are agree that Shopee videos
Agree, 2 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = on TikTok are a good source of reference
Disagree, while 5 = Strongly Disagree. when purchasing a product. Meanwhile,
the CR1 item shows the lowest value,
Irritation is a negative emotion that which is 71.42% (although it is still
includes discontent, discomfort, and rage classified as "Good"). Item CR1 explains
(Wang & Lan, 2018). The irritation that respondents are agree that they trust
dimension is categorized as “Not Good” in the information provided by Shopee
the assessment summary. Based on Table TikTok videos. CR1 has the greatest
6, all the five items are categorized as “Not number of respondents who answered
Good”. Item IR5 is the item that got the strongly disagree as many as 7
highest percentage with a score of respondents, disagree as many as 23
74.18%, which means respondents people, and neutral as many as 104 people.
disagreed that TikTok videos from Shopee
can worsen people's intelligence. In conclusion, according to respondents
Meanwhile, the IR1 item shows the lowest Shopee's Viral Marketing TikTok video
value, which is 68.87% (although it is still delivered good credibility to its viewers.
classified as "Not Good"). Item IR1
explains that respondents disagreed that Table 8. Consumers’ Attitude
SD D N A SA
Item Total Total Score Ideal Score Category
1 2 3 4 5
marketing messages on TikTok Shopee CG1
P 1 9 70 117 78 275 1087
1375 Good
% 0.36% 3.27% 25.45% 42.55% 28.36% 100.00% 79.05%
videos are annoying. IR5 has the greatest CG2
P
%
2
0.73%
16
5.82%
62 103 92
22.55% 37.45% 33.45%
275
100.00%
1092
79.42%
1375 Good
Table 7. Credibility
JGBMR 73
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
JGBMR 74
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
Variable Dimension
Item Factor Loading AVE Conclusion
IF1 0.767 VALID
must be higher than the correlation of the
IF2 0.776 VALID other latent variables (Indrawati, 2017, p.
Informativeness (IF) IF3 0.826 0.657 VALID
IF4 0.848 VALID 71). The following Table 11 presents the
IF5 0.833 VALID
EN1 0.838 VALID
cross-loading value that indicates a valid
EN2 0.821 VALID of discriminant validity:
Entertainment (EN) EN3 0.885 0.723 VALID
EN4 0.88 VALID
Viral Marketing
(Independent
EN5 0.825 VALID Table 11. Correlation Value for Cross
IR1 0.895 VALID
Variable)
IR2 0.878 VALID Loading
Irritation (IR) IR3 0.876 0.78 VALID
IR4 0.899 VALID Consumers' Attitude Credibility (CR) Entertainment (EN) Informativeness (IF) Irritation (IR)
IR5 0.867 VALID AF1 0.84 0.653 0.674 0.597 0.28
CR1 0.84 VALID AF2 0.843 0.676 0.745 0.642 0.252
CR2 0.846 VALID AF3 0.849 0.658 0.784 0.647 0.311
CG1 0.759 0.639 0.566 0.509 0.245
Credibility (CR) CR3 0.883 0.687 VALID
CG2 0.718 0.67 0.48 0.485 0.256
CR4 0.738 VALID CG3 0.811 0.687 0.655 0.589 0.231
CR5 0.831 VALID CN1 0.719 0.577 0.576 0.52 0.285
CG1 0.759 VALID CN2 0.757 0.59 0.628 0.525 0.225
Cognitive (CG) CG2 0.718 VALID CN3 0.767 0.638 0.577 0.501 0.282
CR1 0.651 0.84 0.553 0.553 0.286
CG3 0.811 VALID
Consumers’ CR2 0.758 0.846 0.671 0.514 0.306
AF1 0.84 VALID CR3 0.71 0.883 0.598 0.597 0.275
Attitude
Affective (AF) AF2 0.843 0.618 VALID CR4 0.52 0.738 0.374 0.349 0.277
(Dependent
AF3 0.849 VALID CR5 0.714 0.831 0.543 0.537 0.245
Variable) EN1 0.694 0.602 0.838 0.594 0.227
CN1 0.719 VALID
EN2 0.609 0.498 0.821 0.584 0.178
Conative (CN) CN2 0.757 VALID EN3 0.674 0.546 0.885 0.594 0.281
CN3 0.767 VALID EN4 0.743 0.636 0.88 0.639 0.252
EN5 0.71 0.561 0.825 0.581 0.258
IF1 0.543 0.482 0.565 0.767 0.176
Discriminant Validity IF2
IF3
0.542
0.566
0.525
0.491
0.506
0.579
0.776
0.826
0.22
0.336
IF4 0.585 0.461 0.551 0.848 0.325
IF5 0.643 0.561 0.645 0.833 0.274
Discriminant Validity assesses how IR1
IR2
0.361
0.352
0.365
0.368
0.337
0.295
0.341
0.318
0.895
0.878
different the items used to measure a IR3
IR4
0.241
0.256
0.214
0.25
0.21
0.177
0.246
0.274
0.876
0.899
variable are from those used to measure IR5 0.19 0.193 0.151 0.232 0.867
JGBMR 75
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
It is possible to conclude that the No. Path Diagram Path Coefficient t-value p-value Conclusion
1 Informativeness (IF) -> Consumers' Attitude 0.141 2.868 0.002 Hypothesis is accepted
questionnaire satisfies the Cronbach’s 2 Entertainment (EN) -> Consumers' Attitude 0.399 7.923 0 Hypothesis is accepted
Alpha and Composite Reliability 3 Irritation (IR) -> Consumers' Attitude 0.023 0.754 0.225 Hypothesis is rejected
4 Credibility (CR) -> Consumers' Attitude 0.454 9.519 0 Hypothesis is accepted
criterion. As a result, the measurement
model testing result in this study indicates This study used a 5% significance level,
a good research measuring instrument.
which means that if the t-value > 1.65 and
p-value < 0.05, there is a significant
2. Assessment of Structural Model
relationship between the independent and
The assessment of the structural model, dependent variables or Hypothesis is
often known as the inner model, is the accepted. Three of the hypotheses is
second test (Indrawati, 2017, p. 70). The accepted, meanwhile one of the
goal of this structural model's hypotheses is rejected.
measurement is to see how one latent
It may also be seen from the proportion of
variable interacts with other latent
variables (Indrawati, 2017, p. 70). The variance explained, specifically 𝑅 2 for the
inner model of this study is depicted in dependent latent variable that is
Figure 3. hypothesized to be influenced by the
independent latent variable, in addition to
the path value (Indrawati, 2017, p. 71).
The 𝑅 2 values of 0.67, 0.33, and 0.19,
respectively, suggested that the model is
“good”, “moderate”, and “weak”
(Indrawati, 2017, p. 71).
Table 14. R-square Result
Variable R-square
Consumers’ Attitude 0.802
JGBMR 76
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
JGBMR 77
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
JGBMR 78
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
JGBMR 79
Indrawati, M Rasyad Rizqullah Volume 04 Number 1 (2022)
JGBMR 80