Mid-year Review Form

KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

Name: Name of Rater
Rating Period: Position
Date of Review:

KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

Mid-year Review Rating
MEANS OF
OBJECTIVE Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
VERIFICATION Performance
Rating Remarks Rating Remark Review
Target
s Results
1. Applied Classroom Observation
knowledge Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
of content or inter-observer
within and agreement form/s done
across through onsite / face-to-face
curriculum / in-person classroom
teaching areas. observation. Quality
(PPST 1.1.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
Efficiency
demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 2 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Mid-year Review Rating
MEANS OF
OBJECTIVE Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
VERIFICATION Performance
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Review
Target
Results
2. Used a range Classroom Observation
of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
strategies that or inter-observer
enhance agreement form/s done
learner through onsite / face-to-face
achievement in / in-person classroom
literacy and observation. Quality
numeracy
skills. If onsite / face-to-face / in-
(PPST 1.4.2) person classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
Efficiency
demonstration teaching*
via LAC
session.
*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 3 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Mid-year Review Rating
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Performance
Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

3. Applied a Classroom Observation Tool

range of (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
teaching observer agreement form/s
strategies to done through onsite / face-to- face
develop / in-person classroom
critical and observation.
creative Quality
thinking, as If onsite / face-to-face / in-
well as person classes are not
other implemented,
higher-order • through observation of
thinking synchronous /
skills. asynchronous teaching in
(PPST 1.5.2) other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 4 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 2: Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners
Mid-year Review Rating
MEANS OF
OBJECTIVE Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
VERIFICATION Performance
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Review
Target
Results

4. Managed Classroom Observation

classroom Tool (COT) rating
structure to sheet/s or inter-observer
engage learners, agreement form/s done
individually or in through onsite / face-to- face
groups, in / in-person classroom
meaningful observation. Quality
exploration,
discovery and If onsite / face-to-face / in-
hands-on person classes are not
activities within implemented,
a range of • through observation of
physical synchronous /
learning asynchronous teaching
environments. in other modalities; or
(PPST 2.3.2) • through observation of a
demonstration Efficiency
teaching* via LAC
session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 5 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 2: Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners
Mid-year Review Rating
Performance Rater
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Target
Remarks Review
Rating Rating Rating Results

5. Managed Classroom Observation Tool

learner behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
constructively observer agreement form/s
by applying done through onsite / face-to- face
positive and / in-person classroom
non-violent observation.
discipline to Quality
ensure learning- If onsite / face-to-face / in-
focused person classes are not
environments. implemented,
(PPST 2.6.2) • through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 6 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 2: Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners
Mid-year Review Rating
Performance Rater
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Target
Remark Review
Rating Rating Remarks Results
s
6. Used Classroom Observation Tool
differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
developmentally observer agreement form/s
appropriate done through onsite / face-to- face
learning / in-person classroom
experiences to observation.
address Quality
learners’ gender, If onsite / face-to-face / in-
needs, person classes are not
strengths, implemented,
interests and • through observation of
experiences. synchronous /
(PPST 3.1.2) asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 7 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning
Mid-year Review Rating
Performance Rater
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Target
Review
Remarks Results
Rating Rating Remarks

7. Planned, Classroom Observation Tool

managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
implemented observer agreement form/s
developmentally done through onsite / face-to- face
sequenced / in-person classroom
teaching and observation.
learning Quality
processes to If onsite / face-to-face / in-
meet curriculum person classes are not
requirements implemented,
and varied • through observation of
teaching synchronous /
contexts. asynchronous teaching in
(PPST 4.1.2) other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 8 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning
Mid-year Review Rating
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Performance
Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Results

8. Participated 1. Proof/s of attendance in

in collegial LAC sessions / FGDs /
discussions meetings / other collegial
that use discussions
teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC sessions
learner / FGDs / meetings / other
feedback to collegial discussions on use
Quality
enrich teaching of teacher and learner
practice. feedback to enrich teaching
(PPST 4.4.2) practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs / meetings
/ other collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance Timeliness*
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective

*MOVs for the rating of this performance measure must contain date stamps to track conduct of such activities (e.g., date in the attendance sheets, minutes, and reflection notes, minutes).

Page 9 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning
Mid-year Review Rating
Performance Rater
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Target
Remarks Review
Rating Rating Remarks Results

9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool

developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
organized and observer agreement form/s
used appropriate done through onsite / face-to- face
teaching and / in-person classroom
learning observation.
resources, Quality
including ICT, to If onsite / face-to-face / in-
address learning person classes are not
goals. implemented,
(PPST 4.5.2) • through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 10 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 4: Assessment and Reporting
Mid-year Review Rating
Performance Rater
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Target
Review
Remarks Results
Rating Rating Remarks

10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool

selected, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
organized and observer agreement form/s
used diagnostic, done through onsite / face-to- face
formative and / in-person classroom
summative observation.
assessment Quality
strategies If onsite / face-to-face / in-
consistent with person classes are not
curriculum implemented,
requirements. • through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Efficiency
via LAC session.

*The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 11 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 4: Assessment and Reporting
Mid-year Review Rating
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Performance
Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

11. Monitored Any one (1) of the following:

and evaluated ● Individual Learning
learner Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
progress and ● Peer assessment data
achievement ● Sample of learners’ output
using learner with reflection / self- Quality
attainment assessment
data. ● Progress charts/anecdotal
(PPST 5.2.2) records
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that Timeliness
highlights the objective
(e.g., Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Note: PPST Resource Package Module 11 offers illustrative and instructive information that can help ratees achieve this objective (PPST Indicator 5.2.2).

Page 12 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 4: Assessment and Reporting
Mid-year Review Rating
MEANS OF
OBJECTIVE Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
VERIFICATION Performance
Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Results
12. Communicated Any one (1) of the
promptly and following:
clearly the learners’ ● A sample of corrected
needs, progress test paper of a learner in
and achievement to a learning area with
key stakeholders, parent’s or guardian’s
including signature and date of
parents/guardians. receipt
(PPST 5.4.2) Quality
● Minutes of meetings
with key stakeholders
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
CPC) with proof of
attendance
● Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record Timeliness
showing entries per
quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Note: PPST Resource Package Module 12 offers illustrative and instructive information that can help ratees achieve this objective (PPST Indicator 5.4.2).
Page 13 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 5: Personal Growth and Professional Development
Mid-year Review Rating
MEANS OF
OBJECTIVE Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
VERIFICATION Performance
Review
Target
Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry

personal that highlights the application
philosophy of of a learner- centered
teaching that is teaching philosophy in the
learner-centered. lesson plan or community
(PPST 7.1.2) work

Quality

Timeliness

Page 14 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 KRA 5: Personal Growth and Professional Development
Mid-year Review Rating
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Performance
Review
Target
Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT

professional Coordinator / School Head /
development Focal Person in charge of e-
goals based on SAT
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Quality
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
Standards for 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from
Teachers. Phase II
(PPST 7.5.2)

Efficiency

Timeliness

Page 15 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 Plus Factor
Mid-year Review Rating
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-year
Performance Review
Target Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

15. Performed Any one (1) proof of:

various related ● committee involvement;
works / ● involvement as
activities that module/learning material
contribute to writer/validator;
the teaching- ● involvement as a resource
learning person/speaker/learning Quality
process. facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction;
● book or journal authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorship;
● advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
● participation in demonstration
teaching;
● participation as research
presenter in a Efficiency
forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/in-
service teachers;
● conducted research within
the rating period;
● others (please specify) with
annotation on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process. Timeliness

Page 16 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers
 Page 17 of 20
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teachers