SEC Rules and Regulations Regarding Whistle-Blowing
SEC Rules and Regulations Regarding Whistle-Blowing
Page 24;62/71
Description:
Whistle-blowing Policy
The proposed amendment to the Corporation Code recognizes the need to protect
whistleblowers and provides for a penalty clause for retaliation against whistleblowers. A
whistle-blowing policy that allows employees and other stakeholders to freely communicate
their concerns without fear of any retribution or repercussion is a recognized best practice.
Officers and employees should be able to communicate freely and responsibly any
concern and knowledge about unethical and illegal practices within the corporation.
Require companies to have a whistle-blowing policy that would allow employees and
other stakeholders to freely communicate their concerns without fear of any retribution or
repercussion.
Source: Link:
Description:
Recommendation 15.3
The Board should establish a suitable framework for whistleblowing that allows
employees to freely communicate their concerns about illegal or unethical practices, without
fear of retaliation and to have direct access to an independent member of the Board or a unit
created to handle whistleblowing concerns. The Board should be conscientious in establishing
the framework, as well as in supervising and ensuring its enforcement.
Explanation
A suitable whistleblowing framework sets up the procedures and safe-harbors for
complaints of employees, either personally or through their representative bodies, concerning
illegal and unethical behavior. One essential aspect of the framework is the inclusion of
safeguards to secure the confidentiality of the informer and to ensureprotection from
retaliation. Further, part of the framework is granting individuals or representative bodies
confidential direct access to either an independent director or a
unit designed to deal with whistleblowing concerns. Companies may opt to establish an
ombudsman to deal with complaints and/or established confidential phone and e-mail facilities
to receive allegations.
Explanation:
A suitable whistleblowing framework sets up the procedures and safe-harbors for complaints
of employees, either personally or through their representative bodies, concerning illegal and
unethical behavior. One essential aspect of the framework is the inclusion of safeguards to
secure the confidentiality of the informer and to ensureprotection from retaliation. Further, part
of the framework is granting individuals or representative bodies confidential direct access to
either an independent director or a
unit designed to deal with whistleblowing concerns. Companies may opt to establish an
ombudsman to deal with complaints and/or established confidential phone and e-mail facilities
to receive allegations.
(MC No. 19, s. 2016)
Source: Link:
Description:
Duties to Stakeholders
Principle 13: The rights of stakeholders established by law, by contractual relations and
through voluntary commitments must be respected. Where stakeholders' rights and/or
interests are at stake, stakeholders should have the opportunity to obtain prompt effective
redress for the violation of their rights.
Does the Board adopt a transparent framework and process that allow stakeholders to freely
communicate their concerns about illegal or unethical practices, without fear of retaliation and
to have direct access to the board?
Interpretation:
Page 152/217
Description:
A CRA (Credit Rating Agency) must have detailed whistle-blower policies encouraging
all employees to report (with complete confidentiality) any unethical practice or grave
misconduct to a designated authority. All reported events shall be taken seriously and
investigated promptly. The investigation report shall be submitted within a stipulated time
frame (as specified by the CRA) from the receipt of the complaint. There shall be provisions to
prevent discrimination, retaliation, or harassment against any whistle-blower or participant in
the investigation process.