Tarlac State University

COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION

CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
Lucinda Extension Campus, Tarlac City

RATING SCALE FOR LESSON PLANNING

Name of STUDENT:
Grade Level and Quarter:
Course Code: EEd MTB-MLE
Name of the Instructor: Ma’am Ellaine Raiza

Subject Matter/ Topic:

Date: Time Started: Time Finished:

Instructions. This rating scale consists of 21 strands encapsulate into 7 key areas. And these are:
(1) Lesson Planning and Preparation, (2) Classroom Management, (3) Teaching and Learning
Process, (4) Language Proficiency, (5) Assessment of Learning Outcomes, (6) Reinforcement of
Learning, and (7) Teacher’s Personality.

Read each statement using the scale of 1 to 5, select a numerical value that will indicate the level
of performance of the practice teacher in each of the following strand.

SCALE GENERAL DESCRIPTORS

• 5 – Excellent The teacher exhibits advance level of competence
• 4 – Very Satisfactory The teacher goes beyond the minimum requirements
The teacher meets the minimum requirements for the criterion being
• 3 – Satisfactory
evaluated.
The teacher meets some of the minimum requirements for the
• 2 – Needs Improvement
criterion being evaluated
The teacher does not meet the minimum requirement for the
• 1 – Poor
criterion being evaluated

I. LESSON PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS Satisfactory Improvement Poor (1)
(5) (3)
(4) (2)
1. Teacher's objectives reflect
high level learning related to
curriculum frameworks and
standards; they are adapted,
where necessary, to the needs
of individual students, and
permit practical/ workable
methods of assessment
2. All of the elements of the
instructional design support
the stated instructional
objectives, engage students in
meaningful learning, and show
evidence of student input.
Teacher's lesson or unit is
highly coherent and has a clear
structure

3. All materials and resources

support the instructional
objectives and key concepts,
and most engage students in
meaningful learning
4. There is evidence of student
participation in selecting or
adapting materials

Form No.: TSU-CTE-SF-20 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: October 1, 2022 Page 1 of 4
 Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
Lucinda Extension Campus, Tarlac City

TOTAL
II. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS Satisfactory Improvement Poor (1)
(5) (3)
(4) (2)
1. Classroom routines and
procedures are seamless in
their operation, and students
assume considerable
responsibility for their smooth
functioning
2. Teacher’s classroom is safe
and students contribute to
ensuring that the physical
environment supports the
learning of all students
TOTAL
III. TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS
Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS (5)
Satisfactory
(3)
Improvement Poor (1)
(4) (2)
1. Teacher's knowledge of
content and pedagogy is
extensive, showing evidence of
a continuing search for
improved practice. Teacher
actively builds on knowledge
of prerequisites and
misconceptions when
describing instruction or
seeking causes for student
misunderstanding
2. Teacher formulates many of
the high-level questions and
assumes responsibility for the
participation of all students in
the discussion
3. Students are intellectually
engaged in challenging
content, through well-designed
learning tasks, and suitable
scaffolding by the teacher, and
fully aligned with the
instructional outcomes
4. There is evidence of some
student initiation of inquiry,
and student contributions to
the exploration of important
content
5. The pacing of the lesson
provides students the time
needed to intellectually engage
with and reflect upon their
learning and to consolidate
their understanding
6. All students are cognitively
engaged in the activities and in
their exploration of content.
Students initiate or adapt
activities and projects to
enhance understanding
7. Learning activities are highly
relevant to students and
instructional objectives and

Form No.: TSU-CTE-SF-20 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: October 1, 2022 Page 2 of 4
 Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
Lucinda Extension Campus, Tarlac City

key concepts. They progress

coherently, producing a unified
whole and reflecting recent
professional research
TOTAL
IV. LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY
Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS Satisfactory Improvement Poor (1)
(5) (3)
(4) (2)
1. Teacher's spoken and written
language is correct and
expressive, with well-chosen
vocabulary that enriches the
lesson
2. Conveys information and ideas
with clarity
3. The teacher has well-
modulated voice
TOTAL
V. ASSESMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS Satisfactory Improvement Poor (1)
(5) (3)
(4) (2)
1. The assessment is completely
congruent with the
instructional objectives and
key concepts, both in content
and process
2. Teacher's plan for student
assessment is fully aligned
with the instructional
outcomes, with clear criteria
and standards that show
evidence of student
contribution to their
development

TOTAL
VI. REINFORCEMENT OF LEARNING
Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS Satisfactory Improvement Poor (1)
(5) (3)
(4) (2)
1. The teacher integrated and
carried out the plan for
reinforcing learning through
well-defined agreement and
established connection to next
lesson
TOTAL
VII. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
Very Needs
Excellent Satisfactory
STRANDS Satisfactory Improvement Poor (1)
(5) (3)
(4) (2)
1. The teacher is neat and well-
groomed
2. The teacher is free from
mannerisms that tend to
disturb the students’ attention

Form No.: TSU-CTE-SF-20 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: October 1, 2022 Page 3 of 4
 Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
Lucinda Extension Campus, Tarlac City

3. The teacher’s personality is

strong enough to command
respect and attention
4. The teacher shows dynamism
and enthusiasm
TOTAL

Adopted from: DepEd Order No. 7, s. 2015

SUMMARY OF RATINGS
Indicators Total Mean Weight Weighted Mean
I. Lesson Planning and Preparation 40%
II. Classroom Management
III. Teaching and Learning Process
IV. Language Proficiency
V. Assessment of Learning Outcomes 35%
VI. Reinforcement of Learning 25%
VII. Teacher’s Personality
Total Weighted Mean

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

ELLAINE RAIZA V. MALLARI

LPT
INSTRUCTOR I
(Signature over printed name of the rater)

Form No.: TSU-CTE-SF-20 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: October 1, 2022 Page 4 of 4