Scribd
Upload
63 views5 pages

Phase1 1

The document outlines an activity for a course on integral pedagogical practice. Students are asked to: 1) Read regulations on pedagogical practices and write opinions on specific articles; 2) Write a 200-word plan to meet the regulations' requirements; and 3) Record a minimum 3-minute video explaining their understanding of the regulations document. Students will submit a PDF with their responses. The activity is individually evaluated based on three criteria relating to describing opinions on articles, explaining their plan, and the quality of their explanatory video.

Uploaded by

Lorz Catalina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
63 views5 pages

Phase1 1

The document outlines an activity for a course on integral pedagogical practice. Students are asked to: 1) Read regulations on pedagogical practices and write opinions on specific articles; 2) Write a 200-word plan to meet the regulations' requirements; and 3) Record a minimum 3-minute video explaining their understanding of the regulations document. Students will submit a PDF with their responses. The activity is individually evaluated based on three criteria relating to describing opinions on articles, explaining their plan, and the quality of their explanatory video.

Uploaded by

Lorz Catalina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


Course: Integral pedagogical practice
Code: 518018

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 1 - Reflection of the pedagogical


practice guidelines.

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Initial
Highest score of the activity: 25 points
The activity starts on: Monday, The activity ends on: Sunday, February
February 6, 2023 19, 2023
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

At the end of the activity, the student will be able to identify the pedagogicalpractice
guidelines through a reflective paper.

The activity consists of:

The activity consists of:

1. Read the Specific Regulation of Pedagogical Practices:

El consejo de la Escuela Ciencias de la Educación (2022). Reglamento Específico de


Prácticas Pedagógicas y Educativas de los Programas de Licenciatura de la Escuela
de Ciencias de la Educación. Bogotá D.C. Universidad Nacional Abierta y a
Distancia.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xS35EQCL9VTi8pWjZkJKPO-
YlFivegEL/view?usp=sharing

2. Write your opinion about the following articles of the regulations document.
Youcan include your experience and perceptions.

• Article 12. About this article, I consider…From my experience, it has been….


• Article 13.
• Article 14.
• Article 18.

1
• Article 19.
• Article 20.
• Article 21.
• Article 22.
• Article 23.

3. Write a text of 200 words minimum about your plan to accomplish the
requirements of the Regulation of Pedagogical Practices ECEDU- UNAD.

4. Record a video explaining your understanding of the Regulation of Pedagogical


Practices document and the analyzed articles. Upload the video to the YouTube
platform and share the link. The video must be minimum 3 minutes long.

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must: check the agenda and interact in
the web conferences.

In the Learning Environment, you must: read the suggested document and socialize
the descriptions in the forum titled: Discussion forum - Unit 1 – Phase 1 - Reflection
of the pedagogical practice guidelines.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must: upload the final document in the space
Unit 1 – Phase 1- Reflection of the pedagogical practice guidelines.

Evidences of individual work:


The individual evidence to be submitted is:

Upload a PDF document with the following content:

1. Cover page
2. The description of each article.
3. The plan to accomplish the requirement of the regulations.
4. The link to the video.

Evidences of collaborative work:


The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

2
Interact with your partners about their contributions and help them with ideas and
feedback.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidences, consider the following:

All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.

Each student individually must submit the requested product in the environment
indicated by the teacher.

Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all the
requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:


a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3
3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual


Evaluation moment: Initial
The highest score in this activity is 25 points
First evaluation High level: The student clearly and deeply describes his/her
criterion: opinion about the suggested articles with coherence and
pertinence.
Describe his/her If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points
opinion about the and 7 points
practice regulations.
Average level: The student made a shallow description of the
This criterion suggested articles with coherence and pertinence.
represents 7 If your work is at this level, you can get between 3 points
points of the total and 6 points
of 25 points of
the activity. Low level: The student did not do the requested descriptions
about the practice regulations.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 2 points
Second evaluation High level: The student makes a pertinent plan to accomplish
criterion: the requirements of the Regulation of Pedagogical Practices
ECEDU- UNAD.
Description of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 5 points
plan to accomplish and 7 points
the requirements of
the Regulation of Average level: The student makes a confusing, incoherent,
Pedagogical and or shallow plan to accomplish the requirements of the
Practices ECEDU- Regulation of Pedagogical Practices ECEDU- UNAD.
UNAD. If your work is at this level, you can get between 3 points
and 6 points
This criterion
represents XX Low level: The student did not do the requested plan about the
points of the total Regulation of Pedagogical Practices ECEDU- UNAD.
of XX points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
the activity. points and 2 points

4
Third evaluation High level: The student records a video explaining deeply
criterion: his/her understanding of the Regulation of Pedagogical Practices
ECEDU- UNAD. It is coherent and evidences a good reading
The content of the process of the document.
video If your work is at this level, you can get between 7 points
and 11 points
This criterion
represents 11 Average level: The student records a video with a shallow
points of the total explanation of his/her understanding of the Regulation of
of 25 points of Pedagogical Practices ECEDU- UNAD. It is not coherent and/or
the activity. does not evidence a good reading process of the document.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 4 points
and 6 points

Low level: The student did not record the requested video.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 3 points

You might also like