Breast Data Set
Breast Data Set
• The number of tumour blocks will vary with tumour size but is usually at
least three. The edges of the tumour with surrounding uninvolved tissue
should also be examined in all three dimensions to identify associated DCIS
and peritumoural lymphovascular invasion not visible to the naked eye, and
permit accurate an assessment of whole tumour size.
• If therapeutic samples are sent in more than one portion, it can be extremely
difficult to measure the absolute largest extent of the whole lesion present.
In these cases it is appropriate to measure the maximum distance in any piece
of tissue and to add the dimensions to give an estimated total size or
preferably defer to the imaging size. If, however, the orientation of the
specimens can be determined, the size can be ascertained more reliably
• All surgically relevant margins of therapeutic excision specimens should be
sampled. This will include all radial/circumferential margins (superior,
inferior, medial, lateral and nipple margins), and the deep (posterior) and
superficial (anterior) margins if dictated by local protocol. Particular
attention should be paid to the margin nearest the abnormality and the
margin nearest the nipple.
• The use of different colour inks/markers on an individual section can assist
microscopic identification of specific margins.
1.6.2 Wide local excisions for ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS): presenting as mammographic
calcification
• DCIS typically presents as a mammographically detected abnormality, usually calcification,
which may not be visible on macroscopic examination of the sliced tissue.
• It is usual for the surgeon when performing a therapeutic operation to take all of the tissue
from the subcutaneous aspect to the pectoral fascia.1 It is essential that the pathologist is
informed if the usual surgical protocol has not been undertaken as this will affect the
optimum specimen handling methodology, e.g. central excisions, or specimens where breast
tissue remains at the deep (posterior) and superficial (anterior) aspects of the excision, and
the distance to these margins is thus clinically relevant.
• , the surgeon should mark the nipple duct margin; DCIS tracks towards the nipple4 and, in
this plane in particular, can be some distance from the obvious area of microcalcification.
• The specimen excision margins should be inked and the specimen can be
sliced either before or after fixation. The use of different colour
inks/markers on an individual section can assist microscopic identification
of specific margins. Inks which are radio-opaque should ideally be avoided if
applied prior to slice X-ray. If the specimen is large, then incision before
fixation is recommended. The specimen should be sliced at intervals of
approximately 3–5 mm
• Serial slicing enables specimen slice radiographic mapping of the specimen
which provides a high level of confidence that the lesion has been accurately
and adequately sampled; slicing and X-raying the specimen slices enables
blocks to be taken most accurately from the areas corresponding to the
mammographic abnormality as well as from any other suspicious areas
identified. This is essential to avoid underestimation of lesion size and
overestimation of the distance to specimen margins.
• Macrophotography or schematic diagrams may also assist in recording macroscopic
findings and the block map as well as identifying individual sampled margins.
• Sampling may be facilitated by the identification of any radiological marker (e.g. clip,
collagen marker or coil). Tissue changes relating to previous core biopsy are an
important landmark to indicate sampling of the site of the index lesion and should
be recorded in the report, particularly if the whole abnormality was removed by the
cores. The macroscopic and or radiographic lesion should be described and its
size in three dimensions and distance to margins recorded.
Number of blocks
• Measurement can be made in this way from the most distal involved duct
across the main area of calcification to the most proximal involved duct
Margins
• All surgically relevant margins of therapeutic excision specimens should be
sampled. This will include all radial/circumferential margins (superior,
inferior, medial, lateral and nipple margins), and the deep (posterior) and
superficial (anterior) if dictated by local protocol or by the surgical procedure
from an individual patient.
• Particular attention should be paid to the margin nearest the mammographic
abnormality and the margin nearest the nipple.
Margin in multiple lesions
• If therapeutic samples are sent in more than one portion, it can be extremely
difficult to measure the absolute largest extent of the whole lesion present.
In these cases, it is appropriate to measure the maximum distance in any
piece of tissue and to add the dimensions to give an estimated total size. If,
however, the orientation of the specimens can be determined, the size can be
ascertained more reliably.
1.6.3 Cavity shave/biopsy specimens
• Surgical resection margins. This is typically done after taking the radial
tumour blocks. This can produce a series of additional blocks including:
superior shave, supero-lateral shave, lateral shave, infero-lateral shave, inferior
shave, infero-medial shave, medial shave and supero-medial shaved edge,
depending on the size of the specimen.
• it is recommended that shave margin specimens <1mm thick are sliced
perpendicular to the new margin face so that the distance to margins can be
recorded.
Bed biopsies
• The surgeon may provide separate cavity shaves, which may be submitted to
the laboratory as ‘bed biopsies’. The site of each specimen should be clearly
labelled and each specimen examined separately.
Re-excision specimens
• Re-excision specimens can be weighed and serially sliced at 3–5 mm.
• Blocks taken should be recorded in such a way as to permit accurate
assessment of the adequacy of excision and size of any malignant lesions
identified.
• It is difficult to be proscriptive regarding the extent of block sampling as
the nature and size of these specimens varies; the focus should be on the
new excision margin rather than exhaustive detection of residual disease.
• If re-excision specimens have been taken which contain further tumour, it
can be extremely difficult to determine the absolute size of lesion. A
pragmatic approach is required, and the maximum distance in each piece of
tissue can be measured and added to give an approximate total size of
tumour. If, however, the orientation of the specimens can be determined, the
size of tumour can be ascertained more reliably.
Mastectomy specimens
• 1.7.1 Mastectomy specimens for invasive carcinoma: presenting as mass lesion (Figures 5a and
5b)
• The tumour is conventionally incised from the deep (posterior) fascial plane in the
• sagittal plane at a maximum of 10 mm intervals after inking, e.g. with India ink (Figure
• 5). Differential colour marking of anterior, posterior and radial surfaces may facilitate
• orientation both prior and subsequent to block taking in skin-sparing mastectomies.
• Slicing in the coronal plane from deep (posterior) to anterior (superficial) (Figure 6) may
• be appropriate in some cases, particularly where it may facilitate correlation with
• imaging findings.
Centre of the tumour may be incided in cruciate fashion
•
Axillary clearance specimens
• All lymph nodes should be sampled and involved and uninvolved lymph
nodes should be stated in report.
• Bouin solution, clearing solution may increase the yield
• Each lymph node should be identified and examined
Intraoperative examination of lymph nodes
• Not as a routine
Frozen section and Molecular Techniques
• Detects 70% of metastasis
• Touch imprints 63 %
• One step nucleic acid amplification OSNA, approved by nice , 2013
• RD100i OSNA system
6- CORE DATA ITEMS
• Side
• Pathologist
• Date
• Radiograph
• Mammographic abnormality
• Histological calcification
• SPECIMEN TYPE
• WLE
• Excision
• Diagnostic localization
• Segmental excision
• Mastectomy
• Re- excision
• Futrher margins
• Duct Excision specimens
• Sentinal lymph node
• Axillary sampling
• Axillary lymph node excision
• Vacum assissited excision
• Specimen weight
• Benign / malignant
Tumour classification and prognostic factors
• Tumour size
• Invasive tumour size
• Satellite tumour nodules should not be measured in main tumour dimension
• Features that may be assistance to separate two deposits whether , satellite or
main tumour , a distance of 5mm or more will separate as a second focus
Whole tumour size,invasive tumour and
surrounding DCIS
• The measurement of DCIS with invasive carcinoma should be recorded in
the whole tumour size fieldon reporting form, including tumours which are
composed of predominantly DCISbut have multiple foci of invasion.
• Invasive tumour size should be given in invasive component.
• Pathologist should take blocks between tumour and the excision margin
Insitu carcinoma
• DCIS
• Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma
• Classical lobular ---- multifocal , measurement is un necessary.
• Pleomorphic lobular--- focal , can give to ipsilateral invasive carcinoma.
Disease Extent
• The designation of multiple foci should be reserved for multiple separate
areas of invasive tumour, such as occurs with invasive lobular carcinoma or
tumours with extensive lymphovascular invasion where there are multiple
areas of invasive tumour due to extravasation of tumour cells from
lymphatics and establishment of separate satellite invasive tumour foci.
Histological Grade
• Tubule/acinar formation Score 1. >75% of tumour forming tubular structures 2. 10–75% of
tumour 3. <10% of tumour.
• 6.2.2.2 Nuclear atypia/pleomorphismScore 1. Nuclei small with little increase in size in
comparison with normal breast epithelial cells, regular outlines, uniform nuclear chromatin, little
variation in size 2. Cells larger than normal with open vesicular nuclei, visible nucleoli and
moderate variability in both size and shape. (Figures 20e, 32d) 3. Vesicular nuclei, often with
prominent nucleoli, exhibiting marked variation in size and shape, occasionally with very large
and bizarre forms.
• 6.2.2.3 Mitoses Score
•
• The mitosis score depends on the number of mitoses per 10 high power fields
• 6.2.2.4 Overall grade
•
• The use of terms such as well differentiated or poorly differentiated in the
absence of a numerical grade is inappropriate. The scores for tubule
formation, nuclear pleomorphism and mitoses are then added together and
assigned to grades, as below: Grade 1 = Scores of 3–5 Grade 2 = Scores of
6 or 7 Grade 3 = Scores of 8 or 9.
6.2.4 Lymph node stage
• Participants then return their stained slides to the organising centre, for
evaluation by a panel of four expert assessors. Each of the four assessors
awards marks out of 5, which are then totalled to give a score out of 20
Assessment of human epidermal growth factor
receptor 2 (HER2)
• Thank u