CENTRIFUGAL PUMP TEST

1. OBJECTIVES

To test the Pelton Turbine at different loads and spear valve settings and produce curves that
show the turbine performance and the effect of different spear valve settings.

2. GENERAL INFORMATION

at right angles to the buckets

comes from, an American engineer who researched the best shape of the buckets needed for
the turbine.

Although the concept is very simple, some very large machines of high efficiency have been
developed, with power outputs of more than 100 MW and efficiencies of around 95%. On a
small laboratory model however, the output may be just a few Watts. The efficiency will
therefore be very much smaller, because loses in bearings and by air friction are
proportionally much higher than in a large, powerful turbine.

Fig. 1. The Pelton Turbine

See Figure 2. The turbine is a wheel with
through a Spear Valve that controls and directs the inlet flow through a nozzle and onto the
buckets due to gravity.

Fig. 2. The Pelton Wheel

orks with a cord and two

spring balances to measure the torque in the turbine. The drum has a reflector and clear cover
to work with an optional tachometer to measure the speed of the turbine. A small mechanical
pressure gauge at the inlet of the turbine measures the inlet water pressure.

Fig. 3. View of Back

Technical details are given below:

.
Notation:
 3. USEFUL EQUATIONS

Turbine Power

This is the power absorbed by the turbine wheel, taken from water,

Torque (T)

This is the torque measured by the two spring balances. The balances measure the turning
force on the drum at the back of the turbine (see Figure 4).

Fig. 4. Torque Measurement

The total force is the difference between the readings. Due to the direction of rotation, the
right hand balance will give a larger reading than the left hand balance, so for simplicity:

The torque is the radius of the drum multiplied by the force:

THE PELTON WHEEL

Fig. 5. Pelton Wheel layout

The Pelton Wheel needs a source of water in order to run. If the head of water is known,
along with the flow rate, then it is possible to find the best size of wheel to use, how fast it
should rotate to obtain the maximum efficiency, and what power it is likely to develop.

The velocity in the jet can be estimated by using the known fixed head. The diameter of the
jet can then be found from the known flow rate. A suitable wheel diameter can be chosen in
relation to the jet size; typically the wheel would have a diameter of 10 times that of the jet.
The best speed of rotation may then be selected, such that the speed of the buckets is
approximately half that of the jet speed.

The power delivered in the jet can be calculated from the speed and cross-sectional area of the
jet. The power developed by the Pelton wheel will be less than this, in the ratio of the wheel
efficiency, which may be estimated by reference to the known performance of existing
machines of comparable size and output.

Depending on the head and flow rate available, the size and speed of the Pelton wheel
obtained in this way may prove to be impracticable or uneconomic. Fortunately, other types
of water turbine are available to suit a wide variety of circumstances.

The Pelton wheel is usually chosen when the available head is high, but the flow rate is
comparatively low.
Force Exerted by a Jet

Figure 6a shows a water jet emerging at speed v from a nozzle, and striking one of the
buckets of the wheel, which itself is moving at speed u. The mass flow rate is and it is
assumed that all of the water emerging from the nozzle strikes one or other of the set of
buckets arranged around the periphery of the wheel, although, for simplicity, just one bucket
is shown in the diagram.

Fig. 6. Water jet striking bucket

The relative velocity at which the jet impacts on the bucket is . The flow over the
bucket is decelerated slightly by frictional resistance at the surface. Suppose that the relative
velocity, as the water leaves the bucket, is , where k is a velocity reduction factor
with a value somewhat less than unity.

The relative velocity is inclined at the bucket exit angle ction. The absolute
velocity of the water at exit is the vector sum of the relative velocity and the bucket velocity
, as shown.

The force generated on the bucket may be found by considering the momentum change, as
shown in Figure 6b. The incoming rate of momentum flow in the direction of motion of the
bucket is , and the outgoing rate is:

Note the positive sign before the relative velocity at exit, indicating addition of the relative
and bucket velocities. Note also that will be negative.
Torque Exerted on the Wheel

Fig. 7. Variation of torque with speed ratio

The force produced on the bucket by the difference between these rates of momentum flow
is:

or

It is helpful to express the ratio of bucket speed to jet speed

so that

The torque exerted on the wheel is therefore:

We see that for a particular wheel, supplied with water at some fixed flow rate (so that both
and are also fixed), torque varies as . The torque therefore falls linearly from a
maximum when (i.e. when the wheel is stationary) to zero when (i.e. when the
bucket moves at the same speed as the jet). This is referred to as the runaway condition.
POWER AND EFFICIENCY

The power output developed at the wheel is given below by:

and noting that:

The power output may be written as:

This varies as , so is zero when , or , i.e. when the wheel is either

stationary or when turning at runaway speed. Between these extremes, the power varies
parabolically, with a maximum
maximum power output is:

Hydraulic Efficiency

The power input , in the form of kinetic energy in the jet, is:

Without an accurate figure for the jet diameter, the inlet pressure (shown on a small gauge)
and water flow (measured by the hydraulic bench) gives a good approximation of the inlet
power from:

Where is in m3.s-1 and the pressure is in Pascals.

The hydraulic efficiency , defined as the ratio of output power to input power is:

with a maximum value:

In terms of percentage:
In the absence of friction, the relative speed is not reduced by passage over the bucket surface,
so the value of would then be unity. Moreover, the lowest conceivable value of is 1,
corresponding to So the factor ( ) could ideally just reach the value 2.
The maximum ideal efficiency, , would then just reach 100%, all the kinetic energy in
the jet being transformed into useful power output, with the water falling from the buckets
with zero absolute velocity. In practice, however, surface friction over the bucket is always
100% efficiency can never
be achieved.

It must be emphasised that the hydraulic efficiency used here gives the ratio of hydraulic
power generated by the wheel to the power in the jet. The overall efficiency of the turbine will
fall short of this hydraulic efficiency due to some loss of head in the nozzle, air resistance to
the rotating turbine, and losses at the bearings.

As shown in Figure 8, you can reasonably expect a maximum efficiency of around 60% for
this small turbine. Your results should show that the turbine may not be most efficient at its
maximum power position and that the spear valve position affects maximum speed, torque,
power and efficiency.

Fig. 8. Theoretical Variation of Efficiency with speed

TEST PROCEDURE

1. Create three blank results table, similar to Table 1.

2. Adjust the spring balances to give no load and make sure that they show 0 (zero).
3. Fully shut the spear valve (turn it fully clockwise).
4. Start the hydraulic bench and slowly open its control valve while opening the spear
valve (turn it anticlockwise) until the bench flow is at maximum and the spear valve is
fully open.
5. Use the Hydraulic Bench to measure the initial flow for reference. Note the inlet
pressure.
6. Use the optical tachometer to measure the maximum (no-load) speed of the turbine.
To do this, put the tachometer against the clear window at the back of the turbine and
use it to detect the reflective sticker on the drum.
7. Slowly increase the load in steps to give at least six sets of results. At each step, record
the turbine speed and the reading of each spring balance. Stop when the speed
becomes unstable or the turbine stops rotating.
8. Repeat the test with the spear valve approximately half (50%) open and approximately
quarter (25%) open. The exact amount of spear valve opening is not important, as long
as long they are different from each other to compare the effect.
ASSIGNMENTS

For each table of results:

1. Calculate the inlet power.

2. Calculate toque and mechanical power.
3. Calculate the turbine efficiency.
4. Produce charts of torque and mechanical power at the turbine (vertical axis) against
speed (horizontal axis) for each spear valve opening.
5. Produce charts of efficiency against speed.
6. Compare your results. How does the spear valve position (opening) affect
performance? How does the power in the turbine change with speed? What conditions
give the best power, speed and efficiency?