Microfluidic Genotyping by Rapid Serial PCR and Hi
Microfluidic Genotyping by Rapid Serial PCR and Hi
net/publication/264796478
CITATIONS READS
21 1,063
9 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Renee Howell on 03 January 2017.
BACKGROUND: Clinical molecular testing typically batches Most genetic diseases are rare. Laboratories typically lack
samples to minimize costs or uses multiplex lab-on-a- technology to offer rapid testing for rare diseases or geno-
chip disposables to analyze a few targets. In genetics, mul- types. Individual samples are seldom processed. Instead,
tiple variants need to be analyzed, and different work multiple samples are collected for batch analysis, often
flows that rapidly analyze multiple loci in a few targets are resulting in slow turnaround times varying from a few
attractive. days to several weeks. Despite the extraordinary amount
of information collected by massively parallel sequencing,
METHODS: We used a microfluidic platform tailored to the focus is not on turnaround time, and costs remain
rapid serial PCR and high-speed melting (HSM) to geno- high for single-gene analysis compared with scanning by
type 4 single nucleotide variants. A contiguous stream of high-resolution melting (1 ).
master mix with sample DNA was pulsed with each Turnaround times are often slow in PCR-based
primer pair for serial PCR and melting. Two study sites genetic tests because multiple reactions are performed
each analyzed 100 samples for F2 (c.*97G⬎A), F5 in parallel by use of programmable thermal cyclers.
(c.1601G⬎A), and MTHFR (c.665C⬎T and c.1286A⬎C) These methods are typically restricted to a single pro-
after blinding for genotype and genotype proportions. tocol, placing constraints on assay design. A DNA sam-
Internal temperature controls improved melting curve ple may need to be processed multiple times to accom-
precision. The platform’s liquid-handling system auto- modate varying protocols for a panel of tests. As a
mated PCR and HSM. result, consumables, turnaround times, and laboratory
errors all increase, thus decreasing throughput. In ad-
RESULTS: PCR and HSM were completed in a total of
dition, some protocols require additional reflex testing
12.5 min. Melting was performed at 0.5 °C/s. As ex- based on the initial result outcome. This typically re-
pected, homozygous variants were separated by melt- quires more processing that may require additional
ing temperature, and heterozygotes were identified by batching and delay. Some molecular tests with a lim-
curve shape. All samples were correctly genotyped by ited number of targets use single-use individual car-
the instrument. Follow-up testing was required on tridges. A few can be rapidly performed, but at a cost
1.38% of the assays for a definitive genotype. that may not be acceptable to the laboratory.
Fast molecular testing usually requires specialized
sample containers. For example, rapid-cycle PCR and
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate genotyping accuracy on
high-resolution melting can be performed quickly in
a novel microfluidic platform with rapid serial PCR
capillaries (2 ), but individual capillaries are difficult to
and HSM. The platform targets short turnaround handle in high numbers.
times for multiple genetic variants in up to 8 samples. It We have developed an integrated microfluidic
is also designed to allow automatic and immediate reflex- platform with serial, rapid-cycle PCR and high-speed
ive or repeat testing depending on results from the melting (HSM)5 analysis. Sequential discrete reactions
streaming DNA. Rapid serial PCR provides a flexible ge- within microfluidic channels allow variable thermal
netic work flow and is nicely matched to HSM analysis. cycling and melting parameters for each reaction. The
© 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
volume scale-down of microfluidics enables rapid heat
transfer for faster thermal cycling (3 ) as well as rapid
1
Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Received February 22, 2014; accepted July 17, 2014.
2
current address: Canon U.S. Life Sciences, Newport News, VA; 3 Canon U.S. Life Previously published online at DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.223768
Sciences, Rockville, MD; 4 Department of Mathematics, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT. © 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
5
* Address correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology, University Nonstandard abbreviations: HSM, high-speed melting; ARUP, Associated Re-
of Utah Medical School, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132. Fax gional and University Pathologists; Tm, melting temperature; LED, light-emitting
801-581-6001; e-mail [email protected]. diode; HRM, high-resolution melting.
1306
Microfluidic Genotyping by High-Speed Melting Analysis
rate). After PCR, a denature/renature step was imple- station that was used to house the pipette tips and foam
mented at 95 °C for 1.5 s (50 °C/s ramp rate) and 50 °C rollers that removed excess fluid from the pipette tips
for 2 s (20 °C/s ramp rate) before melting the product. in between fluid deliveries (Fig. 2).
The product was then melted from 65 °C to 95 °C with Two fluid types, either the PCR reagents or the
a 0.5 °C/s ramping rate to produce HSM curves, thus blanking solution, are delivered to 8 fused silica capil-
providing a temperature resolution of approximately laries (Polymicro Technologies) assembled within the
0.02 °C. Melting curves were interpreted with custom cartridge by use of 2 different liquid-handling robots.
high-resolution melting software (17 ). Briefly, the flu- One robot and set of pipette tips is dedicated for PCR
orescence melting curve data was first extracted by re- reagents, whereas the other delivers blanking solution.
moving the exponential background. Then, the nega- First, the blanking solution containing 35 mol/L Al-
tive derivative of the melting curve was obtained by exa 647 fluorescent dye is delivered to the cartridge (see
differentiating the second-degree polynomial best fit online Supplemental Fig. 2A). The solution moves into
with Savitzky–Golay moving windows (18 ). The tem- the cartridge and through the microchannels in the
perature control peak maximum (Tm) was used to glass chip, where it is optically monitored via illumina-
overlay each curve so that the control Tm was translated tion with a red light-emitting diode (LED). Further-
to the mean control Tm of all curves. Homozygous more, the fluid motion is controlled by detecting the
samples were differentiated by Tm, by use of knowledge fluorescent edge of the blanking solution and giving
of the measured Tm difference outlined in Table 1 and feedback to the peristaltic pumps (Watson Marlowe) to
the wild-type control as a reference point along with control and confirm the solution position. Every other
the aid of clustering software (19 ) to help define wild- fluid delivery to the cartridge contains this blanking
type and homozygous variant groupings. Heterozy- solution, whereas alternating deliveries contain the re-
gous samples were distinguished by shape differences, agents for PCR/HSM (see online Supplemental Fig. 2).
caused by the presence of heteroduplexes. This delivery pattern forms the basis of a serial PCR
stream where PCR reagents with specific primers are
MICROFLUIDIC PLATFORM AND WORK FLOW delivered to the cartridge in a sequential fashion. These
Before starting the instrument run, DNA samples were specific reactions on the same DNA sample are sepa-
mixed with the PCR reagents and placed on the 384- rated by blanking solution.
well plate, as indicated in online Supplemental Fig. 1. A maximum of 8 different samples are used in a
The calibrator was also placed on the plate as indicated, run within the same cartridge (1 DNA sample/chan-
and the blanking solution was pipetted onto the car- nel). Cartridge heater calibration is performed at the
tridge. The cartridge has 2 components, a “world-to- beginning of the run by melting a mixture of high- and
chip” poly(methylmethacrylate) plastic interface that low-Tm preamplified products as calibrators (Table 1).
surrounds a glass chip component where PCR and Then, the ultraconserved element PCR is (optionally)
HSM are performed (Fig. 1). These consumables were performed as a control. This is followed by multiple
placed in the instrument drawer together with a tip serial tests, where each locus to be genotyped is sequen-
tially PCR amplified and melted. In our experimental Optics), positioned 45° incident to the glass chip on the
setup, the 2 outer channels in each run were negative fluidic outlet side, with a 632DF22 excitation filter
controls without genomic DNA, and 1 of the remain- (Semrock) to illuminate the fluorescent dyes within the
ing 6 channels contained wild-type control DNA. Each glass chip. Emitted fluorescent light was collected in an
of the microfluidic channels has individual heat con- EF 50-mm F/1.4 USM lens (Canon U.S.A.), passed
trol through thin-film platinum heaters embedded un- through a 510DF80/685DF50 dual bandpass filter
der each sample channel in the glass chip. The heaters (Semrock), and imaged, with an acquisition rate of 30
are isolated from the fluid within the microchannel by Hz for HSM and 1 Hz for other system operations, by
a passivation layer of SiO2. The glass chip design in- use of a complementary metal– oxide semiconductor
cludes gold metal traces that connect to flex circuits on sensor (EOS 5D Mark II, Canon U.S.A.). Heaters used
the cartridge and interface with electrical components proportional/integral/derivative loop control with
on the instrument to enable temperature control. Fans pulse width modulation. The thin-film platinum heat-
in the instrument move air across a heat sink attached ers in the microfluidic chip served as both heaters and
to the glass chip to aid in the passive cooling of the temperature sensors.
platinum heaters during PCR. Additional technical The microfluidic design combined with individual
specifications have been described (20 ). heating allows for rapid-cycle PCR (see online Supple-
The optics to monitor fluid control and perform mental Fig. 3). We used a PCR protocol with 40 cycles
HSM were matched to LCGreen Plus and Alexa 647 of 15 s each. This protocol, coupled with an HSM pro-
fluorescent dyes. We used a 445-nm blue LED (Inno- tocol with a 0.5 °C/s ramp rate from 65 °C to 95 °C,
vation In Optics), positioned 45° incident to the glass allowed a single PCR/HSM test to be completed in
chip on the fluidic inlet side, with a 438DF24 excitation about 12.5 min, not including time for fluid delivery to
filter (Semrock) and a 629-nm red LED (Innovation In the chip. Performing the panel of 5 PCRs used here (1
control and 4 genotyping loci) currently requires 2.5 h, channels decreased from 0.18 °C before temperature
including fluid delivery, system initialization, and cal- correction to 0.07 °C after temperature correction, al-
ibration, steps that have not yet been optimized for lowing good separation of both homozygotes in all as-
speed. At the end of the run, the instrument generates a says. The entire process (PCR, HSM, and melting curve
data output file that contains fluorescence vs tempera- display) required 12.5 min per assay. Representative
ture information. This file is then analyzed for visual melting curves, shown as their negative derivatives, are
genotyping (Fig. 3). displayed in Fig. 3.
As expected, different homozygotes were sepa-
Results rated by Tm, and heterozygotes had a second low tem-
perature peak consisting of heteroduplexes (8 ). An addi-
The small amplicon genotyping products were 43– 48 tional melting transition from the internal temperature
bp, with experimental Tm values of 76.6 – 80.5 °C (Ta- control at 85.0 °C was used to overlay control Tm values
ble 1). The temperature difference between the 2 ho- across samples to increase temperature precision. The
mozygous genotypes (⌬Tm) at each locus varied from minimum difference in temperature between homozy-
0.8 to 1.1 °C as expected for class 1 and class 2 single gous genotypes at any locus was 0.8 °C compared with
base variants (8 ). The synthetic internal temperature a peak SD of 0.07 °C, enough separation that genotyp-
control used to increase temperature precision melted ing errors between homozygotes should be very rare.
5.4 °C higher than any genotype at the 4 loci and did Genotyping accuracy was evaluated in 2 blinded
not interfere with genotyping. The mean Tm SD across studies. In each study, 100 samples were selected from
Stock Ownership: None declared. Other Remuneration: S. Sundberg, travel between University of
Honoraria: None declared. Utah and Rockville, MD; H. Stiles, Canon US Life Sciences.
Research Funding: Grant from Canon US Life Sciences to the Uni-
Role of Sponsor: The funding organizations played a direct role in
versity of Utah, C. Wittwer, PI.
the review and interpretation of data.
Expert Testimony: None declared.
Patents: S. Sundberg, application no. PCT/US2011/050104; C.T. Acknowledgments: The authors thank ARUP laboratories for pro-
Wittwer, patent no. 7803551; R. Palais, patent nos. 8068992 B2 and viding the deidentified samples and Ling Xu, Rob Troyan, and Sand-
8296074 B2; I.T. Knight, patent nos. US7915030B2, US20110262316A1, hya Patel from Canon US Life Sciences for providing technical
and US20120288865A1. assistance.
References
1. Zhou L, Palais RA, Ye F, Chen J, Montgomery JL, artery disease. Circulation 1997;96:2573–7. scanning and genotyping. Clin Chem 2007;53:
Wittwer CT. Symmetric snapback primers for 14. Weisberg I, Tran P, Christensen B, Sibani S, Rozen 1544 – 8.
scanning and genotyping of the cystic fibrosis R. A second genetic polymorphism in methyl- 28. O’Reilly R, Elphick HE. Development, clinical util-
transmembrane conductance regulator gene. Clin enetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) associ- ity, and place of ivacaftor in the treatment of
Chem 2013;59:1052– 61. ated with decreased enzyme activity. Mol Genet cystic fibrosis. Drug Des Devel Ther 2013;7:929 –
2. Wittwer CT, Rasmussen RP, Ririe KM. Rapid PCR Metab 1998;64:169 –72. 37.
and melting analysis. In: Bustin SA, ed. The PCR 15. Seipp MT, Durtschi JD, Liew MA, Williams J, 29. Andresen BS, Dobrowolski SF, O’Reilly L, Muen-
revolution: basic technologies and applications. Damjanovich K, Pont-Kingdon G, et al. Unlabeled zer J, McCandless SE, Frazier DM, et al. Medium-
New York: Cambridge University Press 2010;48 – oligonucleotides as internal temperature controls chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) muta-
69. for genotyping by amplicon melting. J Mol Diagn tions identified by MS/MS-based prospective
3. Zhang C, Xing D. Miniaturized PCR chips for 2007;9:284 –9. screening of newborns differ from those observed
nucleic acid amplification and analysis: latest ad- 16. Bejerano G, Pheasant M, Makunin I, Stephen S,
in patients with clinical symptoms: identification
vances and future trends. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; Kent WJ, Mattick JS, Haussler D. Ultraconserved
and characterization of a new, prevalent muta-
35:4223–37. elements in the human genome. Science 2004;
tion that results in mild MCAD deficiency. Am J
4. Wittwer CT, Reed GH, Gundry CN, Vandersteen 304:1321–5.
Hum Genet 2001;68:1408 –18.
JG, Pryor RJ. High-resolution genotyping by am- 17. Palais R, Wittwer CT. Mathematical algorithms
30. Roe CR DJ. Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation
plicon melting analysis using LCGreen. Clin Chem for high-resolution DNA melting analysis. Meth-
disorders. In: Scriver CR SW, Childs B, Beaudet
2003;49:853– 60. ods Enzymol 2009;454:323– 43.
5. Reed GH, Wittwer CT. Sensitivity and specificity 18. Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B. AL, Valle D, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, eds. The
of single-nucleotide polymorphism scanning by Salvitzky-Golay Smoothing filters numerical metabolic bases of inherited disease. New York:
high-resolution melting analysis. Clin Chem 2004; recipes: the art of scientific computing. New York: McGraw-Hill 2001;2297–326.
50:1748 –54. Cambridge University Press 2007;766 –72. 31. Zhang L, Cui G, Li Z, Wang H, Ding H, Wang DW.
6. Vossen RH, Aten E, Roos A, den Dunnen JT. 19. Zhou L, Wang L, Palais R, Pryor R, Wittwer CT. Comparison of high-resolution melting analysis,
High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA): more High-resolution DNA melting analysis for simul- TaqMan allelic discrimination assay, and Sanger
than just sequence variant screening. Hum Mutat taneous mutation scanning and genotyping in sequencing for clopidogrel efficacy genotyping in
2009;30:860 – 6. solution. Clin Chem 2005;51:1770 –7. routine molecular diagnostics. J Mol Diagn 2013;
7. Montgomery JL, Sanford LN, Wittwer CT. High- 20. Coursey JS, Hasson KC. Compound calibrator for 15:600 – 6.
resolution DNA melting analysis in clinical re- thermal sensors. US Patent Application 2012; 32. Pirmohamed M, Burnside G, Eriksson N, Jor-
search and diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 20120051390 A1. gensen AL, Toh CH, Nicholson T, et al. A random-
2010;10:219 – 40. 21. Wittwer CT, Fillmore GC, Garling DJ. Minimizing ized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin.
8. Liew M, Pryor R, Palais R, Meadows C, Erali M, the time required for DNA amplification by effi- N Engl J Med 2013;369:2294 –303.
Lyon E, Wittwer C. Genotyping of single- cient heat transfer to small samples. Anal 33. Evans JP, Berg JS, Olshan AF, Magnuson T, Rimer
nucleotide polymorphisms by high-resolution Biochem 1990;186:328 –31. BK. We screen newborns, don’t we? Realizing the
melting of small amplicons. Clin Chem 2004;50: 22. Wittwer CT, Garling DJ. Rapid cycle DNA promise of public health genomics. Genet Med
1156 – 64. amplification: time and temperature optimiza- 2013;15:332– 4.
9. Zhou L, Myers AN, Vandersteen JG, Wang L, tion. Biotechniques 1991;10:76 – 83. 34. Dobrowolski SF, Ellingson C, Coyne T, Grey J,
Wittwer CT. Closed-tube genotyping with unla- 23. Wittwer CT, Hahn M, Kaul K. Rapid cycle real- Martin R, Naylor EW, et al. Mutations in the
beled oligonucleotide probes and a saturating time PCR—methods and applications: quantifica- phenylalanine hydroxylase gene identified in 95
DNA dye. Clin Chem 2004;50:1328 –35. tion. Berlin: Springer 2004. patients with phenylketonuria using novel sys-
10. Zhou L, Errigo RJ, Lu H, Poritz MA, Seipp MT, 24. Gundry CN, Vandersteen JG, Reed GH, Pryor RJ,
tems of mutation scanning and specific genotyp-
Wittwer CT. Snapback primer genotyping with Chen J, Wittwer CT. Amplicon melting analysis
ing based upon thermal melt profiles. Mol Genet
saturating DNA dye and melting analysis. Clin with labeled primers: a closed-tube method for
Metab 2007;91:218 –27.
Chem 2008;54:1648 –56. differentiating homozygotes and heterozygotes.
35. van der Stoep N, van Paridon CD, Janssens T,
11. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM. A Clin Chem 2003;49:396 – 406.
Krenkova P, Stambergova A, Macek M, et al.
common genetic variation in the 3⬘-untranslated 25. Seipp MT, Pattison D, Durtschi JD, Jama M,
Diagnostic guidelines for high-resolution melting
region of the prothrombin gene is associated with Voelkerding KV, Wittwer CT. Quadruplex geno-
elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an in- typing of F5, F2, and MTHFR variants in a single curve (HRM) analysis: an interlaboratory valida-
crease in venous thrombosis. Blood 1996;88: closed tube by high-resolution amplicon melting. tion of BRCA1 mutation scanning using the 96-
3698 –703. Clin Chem 2008;54:108 –15. well LightScanner. Hum Mutat 2009;30:899 –909.
12. Bertina RM, Koeleman BP, Koster T, Rosendaal 26. Herrmann MG, Durtschi JD, Bromley LK, Wittwer 36. Guedes JG, Veiga I, Rocha P, Pinto P, Pinto C,
FR, Dirven RJ, de Ronde H, van der Velden PA, CT, Voelkerding KV. Amplicon DNA melting anal- Pinheiro M, et al. High resolution melting analysis
Reitsma PH. Mutation in blood coagulation factor ysis for mutation scanning and genotyping: cross- of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA in KRAS exon 2
V associated with resistance to activated protein platform comparison of instruments and dyes. wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Can-
C. Nature 1994;369:64 –7. Clin Chem 2006;52:494 –503. cer 2013;13:169.
13. Kluijtmans LA, Kastelein JJ, Lindemans J, Boers 27. Herrmann MG, Durtschi JD, Wittwer CT, Voelk- 37. Pritchard CC, Grady WM. Colorectal cancer mo-
GH, Heil SG, Bruschke AV, et al. Thermolabile erding KV. Expanded instrument comparison of lecular biology moves into clinical practice. Gut
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in coronary amplicon DNA melting analysis for mutation 2011;60:116 –29.