03 Literature Review
03 Literature Review
Performance results from the interaction of physical financial & human resources.
The first two are inanimate they are translated into “productivity “only when the
human element is introduced. However, the human element interjects a variable
over which a management has a limited control. When dealing with the inanimate
factors of production, a management can accurately predict the input-output
relationship and can even vary the factor it chooses in order to achieve a desire
rate of production. In dealing with employees, however, an intangible factor of
will, volition or freedom of choice is introduced, and workers can increase or
decrease their productivity as they choose. This human quality gives rise to the
need for positive motivation.
Peter Drucker (1990) professional employees the most rapidly growing group,
new promotional opportunities should carry the same prestige, weight & position
as the traditional opportunities for promotion to managerial positions
Fred Luthans (1995) Learning is a major psychological process, but it has not
been as popular in the study of organizational behavior as constructs such as
attitudes or motivation. Behavioral management systematically applied through
steps such as Organizational Behavior Model can help meet the performance
improvement challenges facing today‟s organizations in the highly competitive
global economy.
Aswathappa K (1997-2005) An organization‟s goals can be achieved only when
people put their best efforts. Performance Appraisal is the best way, to ascertain
whether an employee has given his or her best performance.
Anne Bruce & James S. Pepitone (1999) It is no longer sufficient to give people
simplistic, behavioral motivators. Employees today are better informed than ever
before. They are too sophiscated for the Quasi-manipulative tactics that have
worked for many managers in the past?
Beverly Kaye & Sharon Jordan (1999) Reward recognition, which matters
more. Praise or pay. pg 143-151
Sue Shellenbarger (1998) As the next century nears; employers are trying with
growing intensity to engage workers from neck up. They are using tender words
like commitment and loyalty to describe the bond they want. Some are hiring
psychologists to study workers; others are routinely taking employee‟s psychic
pulse in painstaking attitude surveys.
Tom Coens & Mary Jenkins (2000) The dynamic of people, money &
motivation are too complex to fully understand. However, if your organization
takes time to clarify what it is trying to achieve & builds from healthy underlying
assumptions, it can create more effective compensation practices & a positive
work environment.
Heinz Weihrich & Harold Koontz (2001) Managerial appraisal has sometimes
been referred to as the Achilles‟ heel of managerial staffing, but it is probably a
major key to managing itself. It is the basis for determining who is promotable to
a higher position. One way to integrate organizational demands and individual
needs is through career management.
Andrew von Nordenflycht & Jody Hoffer Gittell (2004) Both the qualitative
and quantitative results suggest that relational factors-conflict and workplace
culture-are more important determinants of performance than the structural
factors of unionzation, shared governance, and wages.
Peter Ducker (2004-2007) the foremost management guru has observed that
productivity is the first step of management competence. And, according to
Deming, 85% of all productivity problems relate to management and only 15%
relate to workers performance. Effective managers must demonstrate high
productivity.
Gary Dessler & Biju Varkkey (2008) Tying worker‟s pay to their performance
is widely popular. Indeed with the emphasis on competitiveness, productivity and
delivering measurable bottom line results the trends for virtually all employers is
to tie at least some portion of their worker‟s pay to the worker‟s and / or the
company‟s performance. In India, pay performance is gaining wide acceptance
and having a Performance linked pay (PRP) plan is considered as a good HR
practice.
The Porter and Lawler model has definitely made a significant contribution to the
better understanding of work motivation and the relationship between
performance and satisfaction. But to date, it has not made impact on the actual
practice of HRM.
“Human Resource (HR) Managers must with the times and keep abreast with
developments. They must be pro-active, innovative and move into new frontiers
and paradigms to achieve standards of excellence.”
Johanna Mac Neil (2009) The ideas, complimented with some selective but very
interesting data on trends in profit, industrial action, costs, aircraft and labour
productivity, service quality and employee morale, provide the foundation for a
clear and engaging overview of what has happened in the airline industry in the
last 30 years.
R. N. Misra (2009) Human Resource Management After Globalization says:
“Beyond subsistence level, becoming needs 9 self- actualization needs) posses
greater preference value and satisfying than deficiency needs (which are
necessary for survival). Below the subsistence level, however the reverse holds
true.” He makes the following generalization:
Incentives, whether they are monetary or non monetary, tend to increase
the level of motivation in a person.
Financial incentives relate more effectively with basic motivation or
deficiency needs.
Non – financial incentives are linked more closely with higher motivation,
or becoming needs (not possessed by many individual in the organization).
Gilbert calls a performance audit based i.e. opportunities based on the following
steps:
Identify current accomplishments
Identify desired accomplishments
Identify exemplary (realistic potential) performance
Measure exemplary performance
Measure typical performance
Computing the potential for improvement
Translating the potential into economic stakes
The HPT Model is very much akin to the Instructional technology. The difference
is in that the parameters are wider and the Performance Technologist has to be a
generalist with knowledge of various interventions but with expertise in some of
them. In this context it has to be a collaborative effort in dealing with problems
rather than leaving the onus on the trainers or individual consultants. It caters for
Wider responsibility from within the organization
Higher accountability
Greater commitment
More cooperation
Alignment to organization objectives
Staff attuned to problem solving culture
Focused to measurement and result
CAPA Center for Aviation (22 June 2010) Human resource issues remain
Following Air India – Indian airlines Merger. Promotion and career progression:
Establishment of departmental promotion committees to recommend and review
promotions formed of equal numbers of workers from Air India & Indian
Airlines.
Times of India PTI (Oct 31st 2011), Air India Pilots allege discrimination,
threaten to quit. The decision and action of management provide a windfall gain
to the pilots of Indian Airline at the expense of the career progression prospects of
the pilots of erstwhile Air India.
The Economic Times (4th May 2012) Government links AI‟s equity infusion to
performance says airline to get funding only if it achieves targets.
Times of India PTI (May 15th 2012) Pilots‟ strike Air India stops international
booking.
The Economic Times (10th August 2012) James Thomas Productivity measures
are stringent for workforce but engagement initiatives for them are relatively low.
The initiatives to engage are usually restricted to the senior employees.
The Economic Times (28th August 2012) Yasmine Taj A talent strategy that
emphasis the frequent use of the right financial ad non financial motivators would
benefit most companies in bleak times and fair.