Scribd
Upload
42 views

Display Technologies: CMSC 435

The document discusses different display technologies including cathode ray tubes (CRTs), liquid crystal displays (LCDs), plasma displays, digital micromirror devices, and organic light-emitting diode arrays. It provides details on how CRTs, color CRTs, and raster CRTs work. It also discusses the pros and cons of different display technologies and how framebuffers interface between the physical display and the computer's representation of an image.

Uploaded by

nischal11071992
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
42 views

Display Technologies: CMSC 435

The document discusses different display technologies including cathode ray tubes (CRTs), liquid crystal displays (LCDs), plasma displays, digital micromirror devices, and organic light-emitting diode arrays. It provides details on how CRTs, color CRTs, and raster CRTs work. It also discusses the pros and cons of different display technologies and how framebuffers interface between the physical display and the computer's representation of an image.

Uploaded by

nischal11071992
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Display Technologies

CMSC 435

Slides based on Dr. Luebkes slides

Recap: Transforms
Basic 2D Transforms: Scaling, Shearing, Rotation, Reflection, Composition of 2D Transforms Basic 3D Transforms: Rotation, Shearing, Translation Homogeneous Coordinates Windowing Transforms: 3 Steps Coordinate Transforms

Display Technologies
Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs)
Most common display device Evacuated glass bottle (last of the vacuum tubes) Heating element (filament) Electrons pulled towards anode focusing cylinder Vertical and horizontal deflection plates Beam strikes phosphor coating on front of tube

Display Technologies: CRTs


Vector Displays
Anybody remember Battlezone? Tempest?

Display Technologies: CRTs


Vector displays
Early computer displays: basically an oscilloscope Control X,Y with vertical/horizontal plate voltage Often used intensity as Z Show:
http://graphics.lcs.mit.edu/classes/6.837/F98/Lecture1/Slide11.html

Name two disadvantages


Just does wireframe Complex scenes visible flicker

Display Technologies: CRTs


Black and white television: an oscilloscope with a fixed scan pattern: left to right, top to bottom
Paint entire screen 30 times/sec
Actually, TVs paint top-to-bottom 60 times/sec, alternating between even and odd scanlines This is called interlacing. Its a hack. Why do it?

To paint the screen, computer needs to synchronize with the scanning pattern of raster
Solution: special memory to buffer image with scan-out synchronous to the raster. We call this the framebuffer.

Display Technologies: CRTs


Raster Displays
Raster: A rectangular array of points or dots Pixel: One dot or picture element of the raster Scanline: A row of pixels Rasterize: find the set of pixels corresponding to a 2D shape (line, circle, polygon)

Display Technologies: CRTs


Raster Displays
Frame must be refreshed to draw new images As new pixels are struck by electron beam, others are decaying Electron beam must hit all pixels frequently to eliminate flicker Critical fusion frequency
Typically 60 times/sec Varies with intensity, individuals, phosphor persistence, lighting...

Display Technology: Color CRTs


Color CRTs are much more complicated
Requires manufacturing very precise geometry Uses a pattern of color phosphors on the screen:

Delta electron gun arrangement

In-line electron gun arrangement

Why red, green, and blue phosphors?

Display Technology: Color CRTs


Color CRTs have
Three electron guns A metal shadow mask to differentiate the beams

Display Technology: Raster CRTs


Raster CRT pros:
Allows solids, not just wireframes Leverages low-cost CRT technology (i.e., TVs) Bright! Display emits light

Cons:
Requires screen-size memory array Discreet sampling (pixels) Practical limit on size (call it 40 inches) Bulky Finicky (convergence, warp, etc)

CRTs Overview
CRT technology hasnt changed much in 50 years Early television technology
high resolution requires synchronization between video signal and electron beam vertical sync pulse

Early computer displays


avoided synchronization using vector algorithm flicker and refresh were problematic

CRTs Overview
Raster Displays (early 70s)
like television, scan all pixels in regular pattern use frame buffer (video RAM) to eliminate sync problems

RAM
MB (256 KB) cost $2 million in 1971 Do some math
1280 x 1024 screen resolution = 1,310,720 pixels Monochrome color (binary) requires 160 KB High resolution color requires 5.2 MB

Display Technology: LCDs


Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs)
LCDs: organic molecules, naturally in crystalline state, that liquefy when excited by heat or E field Crystalline state twists polarized light 90.

Display Technology: LCDs


Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs)
LCDs: organic molecules, naturally in crystalline state, that liquefy when excited by heat or E field Crystalline state twists polarized light 90

Display Technology: LCDs


Transmissive & reflective LCDs:
LCDs act as light valves, not light emitters, and thus rely on an external light source. Laptop screen: backlit, transmissive display Palm Pilot/Game Boy: reflective display

Display Technology: Plasma


Plasma display panels
Similar in principle to fluorescent light tubes Small gas-filled capsules are excited by electric field, emits UV light UV excites phosphor Phosphor relaxes, emits some other color

Display Technology
Plasma Display Panel Pros
Large viewing angle Good for large-format displays Fairly bright

Cons
Expensive Large pixels (~1 mm versus ~0.2 mm) Phosphors gradually deplete Less bright than CRTs, using more power

Display Technology: DMDs


Digital Micromirror Devices (projectors)
Microelectromechanical (MEM) devices, fabricated with VLSI techniques

Display Technology: DMDs


DMDs are truly digital pixels Vary grey levels by modulating pulse length Color: multiple chips, or color-wheel Great resolution Very bright Flicker problems

Display Technologies: Organic LED Arrays


Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Arrays
The display of the future? Many think so.

Display Technologies: Organic LED Arrays


OLEDs function like regular semiconductor LEDs
But with thin-film polymer construction:
Thin-film deposition of organic, light-emitting molecules through vapor sublimation in a vacuum. Dope emissive layers with fluorescent molecules to create color. Not grown like a crystal, no high-temperature doping Thus, easier to create large-area OLEDs

Display Technologies: Organic LED Arrays


OLED pros:
Transparent Flexible Light-emitting, and quite bright (daylight visible) Large viewing angle Fast (< 1 microsecond off-on-off) Can be made large or small

Display Technologies: Organic LED Arrays


OLED cons
Not quite there yet (96x64 displays) except niche markets Cell phones (especially back display) Car stereos Not very robust, display lifetime a key issue Currently only passive matrix displays Passive matrix: Pixels are illuminated in scanline order (like a raster display), but the lack of phosphorescence causes flicker Active matrix: A polysilicate layer provides thin film transistors at each pixel, allowing direct pixel access and constant illumination Hard to compete with LCDs, a moving target

Framebuffers
So far weve talked about the physical display device How does the interface between the device and the computers notion of an image look? Framebuffer: A memory array in which the computer stores an image
On most computers, separate memory bank from main memory (why?) Many different variations, motivated by cost of memory

Trivia
How many workstations were used to Render images for Pixars Toy Story? Pixar created a networked bank of 117 Sun SPARC workstations (each containing at least two microprocessors) Using one single-processor computer to render Toy Story would have taken 43 years of nonstop performance Each of the movie's more than 1,500 shots and 114,000 frames were rendered on the RenderFarm, a task that took 800,000 computer hours to produce the final cut. Each frame used up 300 megabytes of data and required from 2 to 13 hours for final processing.

You might also like