THE DHIMMI REVOLUTION

DR. BILL WARNER

March 2007
www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm=5794&sec-id=5794
 There are two areas to study in Islam - its doctrine and history—
the theory and its results. The history shows the practical results
of the doctrine.
The first principle is that the Koran, Sira and Hadith must be
taken as a whole. We call them the Islamic Trilogy to emphasize
the unity of the texts.
Our major intellectual breakthrough is to see that dualism is
the foundation and key to understanding Islam. Everything about
Islam comes in twos starting with its foundational declaration:
1. There is no god but Allah and
2. Mohammed is His prophet.
Therefore, Islam is Allah (Koran) and the Sunna (words and
deeds of Mohammed found in the Sira and Hadith).
Endless ink has been wasted on trying to answer the question:
what is Islam? Is Islam the religion of peace? Or is the true Islam a
radical ideology? Is a moderate Muslim the real Muslim?
This reminds a scientist of the old arguments about light. Is
light a particle or is light a wave? The arguments went back and
forth. Quantum mechanics gave us the answer. Light is dualistic;
it is both a particle and a wave. It is depends upon the
circumstances as to which quality manifests. Islam functions in
the same manner.
Our first clue about the dualism is in the Koran, which is
actually two books - the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of
Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from
the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam
resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This
means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But
in fact, since the Koran is the perfect word of Allah, both verses
are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier
verse cannot be wrong since it came from Allah and Allah is
perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.”
Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The
circumstances govern which verse is used.
For example:
 (Koran of Mecca) 73:10: Listen to what they [unbelievers] say with
patience, and leave them with dignity.
From tolerance we move to the ultimate intolerance—not even
the Lord of the Universe can stand the unbelievers:
(Koran of Medina) 8:12: Then your Lord spoke to His angels and
said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror
into the unbelievers’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their
fingers!”
All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction—if
two things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But
Islamic logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and
both are true.
No dualistic system may be measured by one answer. This is
the reason that the arguments about what constitutes the “real”
Islam go on and on and are never resolved. A single right answer
does not exist.
Dualistic systems can only be measured by statistics. It is futile
to argue one side of the dualism is true. As an analogy, quantum
mechanics always gives a statistical answer to all questions.
For an example of using statistics, look at the question: what is
the real jihad - the jihad of inner spiritual struggle or the jihad of
war? Let’s turn to Bukhari (the Hadith) for the answer, as he
repeatedly speaks of jihad. In Bukhari, 97% of the references to
jihad are about war and 3% are about the inner struggle. So the
statistical answer is that jihad is 97% war and 3% inner struggle. Is
jihad war? Yes—97%. Is jihad inner struggle? Yes—3%. So if you
are writing an article, you can make a case for either. But in truth,
almost every argument about Islam can be answered by: “all of
the above.” Both sides of the duality are right.
Our Ignorance
First, let’s see how ignorant we are about the history of
political Islam. How many Christians can tell you how Turkey or
Egypt became Islamic? What happened to the Seven Churches of
Asia mentioned in Paul’s letters? Find a Jew who can tell you the
Jewish history of dhimmitude [A dhimmi is less than a second-class
citizen of an Islamic state. They can remain Christian or Jew, but
pay a special tax and have very few legal rights. They are
forbidden to study the Koran, speak against Islam or proselytize.
Islam calls this status protected.] Today a dhimmi is a non-believer
who defers to Islam, is ignorant of the doctrine of Islam and never
challenges it. Dhimmitude is the state of mind of a dhimmi
(second class citizens who serve Islam). What European knows
that white women were the highest priced slaves in Mecca?
Everyone knows how many Jews Hitler killed, but find an
unbeliever who can tell you how many died in jihad over the last
1400 years.
We are just as ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. An FBI
agent gets two hours of training on Islam and most of that is how
not to offend the imam. We are fighting in Iraq. Who utilizes the
political, military doctrine of Islam to plan strategy? Who can find
a single rabbi or minister [a Baba, Bapu, Swami, or Guru] who has
read the Koran, Sira and Hadith? Does governor, senator,
congressman or military leader display a knowledge of the
political doctrine of Islam? Try to find a course available in a
college about Islamic political doctrine and ethics. Graduates are
schooled in Islamic art, architecture, poetry, Sufism, and a
glorious history that ignores the suffering of the innocent
unbelievers. Graduates read comments about the Koran and
Hadith, but do not read the actual doctrine.
So why are we so ignorant? Let’s start at the beginning. When
Islam burst out of Arabia into a decaying Byzantine world, the
unbelievers recorded it as an Arabic invasion. Similarly, the
invasion of Eastern Europe was by Turks; the invasion of Spain
was by Moors. Our scholars were incapable of even naming the
invaders.
Mohammed killed every single intellectual or artist who
opposed him. And 1400 years later, it was fear, not some
imagined sensitivity that caused the vast majority of the world’s
media to not reprint the Mohammed cartoons. Fear is a fabulous
basis for ignorance, but that is not enough to explain it all. What
accounts for the almost psychotic aversion to knowledge about
Islam? Beyond fear is the realization that political Islam is
profoundly foreign to us.
 Let’s examine the ethical basis of our civilization. All of our
politics and ethics are based upon a unitary ethic that is best
formulated in the Golden Rule: Treat others as you would be treated.
The basis of this rule is the recognition that at one level we are
all the same. We are not all equal. Any game of sports will show
that we do not have equal abilities. But everyone wants to be
treated as a human being. In particular, we all want to be equal
under the law and be treated as social equals. On the basis of the
Golden Rule—the equality of human beings—we have created
democracy, ended slavery and treat women and men as political
equals. So the Golden Rule is a unitary ethic. All people are to be
treated the same. All religions have some version of the Golden
Rule except Islam.
The term “human being” has no meaning inside of Islam.
There is no such thing as humanity, only the duality of the
believer and unbeliever. Look at the ethical statements found in
the Hadith. A Muslim should not lie, cheat, kill or steal from other
Muslims. But a Muslim may lie, deceive or kill an unbeliever if it
advances Islam. There is no such thing as a universal statement of
ethics in Islam. Muslims are to be treated one way and
unbelievers another way. The closest Islam comes to a universal
statement of ethics is that the entire world must submit to Islam.
After Mohammed became a prophet, he never treated an
unbeliever the same as a Muslim. Islam denies the truth of the
Golden Rule.
By the way, this dualistic ethic is the basis for jihad. The ethical
system sets up the unbeliever as less than human and therefore it
is easy to kill, harm or deceive the unbeliever.
Now mind you, unbelievers have frequently failed at applying
the Golden Rule, but we can be judged and condemned on its
basis. We do fall short, but is our ideal.
There have been other dualistic cultures. The Klu Klux Klan
comes to mind. But the KKK is a simplistic dualism. The KKK
member hates all “niggers” at all times; there is only one choice.
This is very straightforward and easy to see.
 The dualism of Islam is more deceitful and offers two choices
on how to treat the unbeliever. The unbeliever can be treated
nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his cattle well. So Islam can
be “nice”, but in no case is the unbeliever a “brother” or a friend.
In fact, there are some 14 verses of the Koran that are emphatic—a
Muslim is never a friend to the unbeliever. A Muslim may be
“friendly,” but he is never an actual friend. And the degree to
which a Muslim is actually a true friend is the degree to which he
is not a Muslim, but a hypocrite.
As mentioned earlier, the other point of profound difference is
logic. To reiterate, all of science is based upon the law of
contradiction. If two things contradict each other, then at least one
of them has to be false. But inside of Islamic logic, two
contradictory statements can both be true. Islam uses dualistic
logic and we use unitary scientific logic.
Since Islam has a dualistic logic and dualistic ethics, it is
completely foreign to us. Muslims think differently from us and
feel differently from us. So our aversion is based upon fear and a
rejection of Islamic ethics and logic. This aversion causes us to
avoid learning about Islam, so we are ignorant and stay ignorant.
Another part of the aversion is the realization that there is no
compromise with dualistic ethics. There is no halfway place
between unitary ethics and dualistic ethics. If you are in a
business deal with someone who is a liar and a cheat, there is no
way to avoid getting cheated. No matter how nice you are to a con
man, he will take advantage of you. There is no compromise with
dualistic ethics. In short, Islamic politics, ethics and logic cannot
be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate; it dominates.
There is never any “getting along” with Islam. Its demands never
cease and the demands must be met on Islam’s terms: submission.
The last reason for our aversion to the history of political Islam
is our shame. Islam put over a million Europeans into slavery.
Since Muslims can’t be enslaved, it was a white Christian who
was the Turkish sultan’s sex slave. These are things that we do not
want to face.
Jews don’t want to acknowledge the history of political Islam,
because they were dhimmis -second class citizens or semi-slaves,
just like the Christians. Jews like to recall how they were advisors
and physicians to powerful Muslims, but no matter what the Jew
did or what position he held, he was still a dhimmi. There is no
compromise between being equal and being a dhimmi
Why should a Hindu want to recall the shame of slavery and
the destruction of their temples and cities? After Hindu craftsmen
built the Taj Mahal, the Muslim ruler, Shah Jahan, had their right
hands cut off so that they could not build anything as beautiful for
anyone else. The practice of suttee, the widow throwing herself on
the husband’s funeral pyre, came about as a response to the rape
and brutality of the Islamic jihad as it swept over ancient
Hindustan.
Blacks don’t want to face the fact that it was a Muslim who
rounded up their ancestors in Africa to wholesale to the white
slave trader. The Arab is the true master of the African. Blacks
can’t accept the common bond they share with whites: that both
Europeans and Africans were slaves under Islam. Blacks like to
imagine Islam is their counterweight to white power, not that
Islam has ruled them for 1400 years.
Dualistic logic, Dualistic ethics, Fear, Shame. There is no
compromise. These are the reasons we don’t want to know about
Islam’s political history, doctrine or ethics.
Political Islam and Non-political Islam
Non-political Islam is religious Islam. Religious Islam is what a
Muslim does to avoid Hell and go to Paradise. These are the Five
Pillars of Islam: prayer, charity to Muslims, pilgrimage to Mecca,
fasting and declaring Mohammed to be the final prophet.
But the Trilogy is clear about the doctrine. At least 75% of the
Sira (life of Mohammed) is about jihad. About 67% of the Koran
written in Mecca is about the unbelievers, or politics. Of the Koran
of Medina, 51% is devoted to the unbelievers. About 20% of
Bukhari’s Hadith is about jihad and politics. Religion is the
smallest part of Islamic foundational texts.
Political Islam’s most famous duality is the division of the
world into believers, Dar al Islam, and unbelievers, Dar al Harb.
The largest part of the Trilogy relates to treatment of the
unbelievers, kafirs. Even Hell is political. There are 146 references
to Hell in the Koran. Only 6% of those in Hell are there for moral
failings—murder, theft, etc. The other 94% of the reasons for being
in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Mohammed,
a political crime. Hence, Islamic Hell is a political prison for those
who speak against Islam.
Mohammed preached his religion for 13 years and garnered
only 150 followers. But when he turned to politics and war, in 10
years’ time he became the first ruler of Arabia by averaging an
event of violence every 7 weeks for 9 years. His success did not
come as a religious leader, but as a political leader.
In short, political Islam defines how the unbelievers are to be
dealt with and treated.
The History of Political Islam
The history of political Islam starts with Mohammed’s
emigration from Mecca to Medina. From that point on, Islam has
always offered the world the dualistic option of joining a glorious
religion or being the subject of political pressure and violence.
After the emigration to Medina, Islam became violent when
persuasion failed. Jihad entered the world.
After Mohammed’s death, Abu Bakr, the first caliph, settled
the theological arguments of those, who wished to leave Islam,
with the political action of death by the sword.
The jihad of Umar (the second caliph, a pope-king) exploded
into the world of the unbelievers. Jihad destroyed a Christian
Middle East and a Christian North Africa. Soon it was the fate of
the Persian Zoroastrian and the Hindu to become the victims of
jihad.
The history of political Islam details the destruction of
Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa.
Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the
southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60
million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest.
Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was annihilated and 80
million Hindus killed.
 The first Western Buddhists were the Greeks descended from
Alexander the Great’s army in what is now Afghanistan. Jihad
destroyed all Buddhism along the silk route. About 10 million
Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the practical result
of pacifism.
Zoroastrianism was eliminated from Persia.
The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam.
In Africa over 120 million Christians and animists have died
over the last 1400 years of jihad.
Approximately 270 million [see endnote] non-believers died
over the last 1400 years in the jihad of political Islam. These are
the Tears of Jihad - a subject which is not taught in any school.
Our Intellectuals’ Response
The basis of all the unbelievers’ world-view has collapsed in
the face of Islamic political thought, ethics and logic. We have
already mentioned how the Christian intellectuals could not even
name the invaders as Muslims. We have no method of analysis of
Islam. We can’t agree on what Islam is and have no knowledge
about our suffering as the victims of a 1400-year jihad.
Look at how Christians, Jews, blacks, intellectuals and artists
have dealt with Islamic doctrine and history. In every case, their
primary ideas fail.
Christians believe that “love conquers all.” Well, love does not
conquer Islam. Christians have a difficult time seeing Islam as a
political doctrine, not a religion. The sectarian nature of Christian
thought means that the average non-Orthodox Christian has no
knowledge or sympathy about the Orthodox Christian’s suffering.
Jews have a theology that posits a unique relationship between
Jews and the creator-god of the universe. But Islam sees the Jews
as apes who corrupted the Old Testament. Few Jews see any
connection between Islam’s political doctrine and Israel.
7,166: But when they persisted in what they had been forbidden, We
said to them, “Be as apes, despised and loathed.” [The Jews were changed
into apes.]
 Black intellectuals have based their ideas on the slave/victim
status and how wrong it was for white Christians to enslave them.
Islam has never acknowledged any of the pain and suffering it has
caused in Africa with its 1400-year-old slave trade. On the other
hand, blacks make no attempt to obtain an apology and are silent
in the presence of Islam. The Arab is the master of the blacks.
Multiculturalism is bankrupt against Islam’s demand for every
civilization to submit. The culture of tolerance collapses in the face
of the sacred intolerance of dualistic ethics. Intellectuals respond
by ignoring the failure.
Molestation of the Mind
Non-Muslims accept violence and threats from Islam without
protest. This acceptance of violence is the sign of a profoundly
molested psyche. The Free are like the battered wife and molested
child of Islam.
Violent molestation can cause denial.
Islam’s explosive jihad destroyed half of Christianity,
Hinduism, and all of Buddhism along the Silk Route. Now let’s
look at what manifests after violent molestation. The YWCA Rape
Crisis Counselor Training Manual shows the following reactions are
common among victims of rape and child molestation:
Disbelief: the victim has an incredibly hard time believing that the
attacks took place.
The media reports very little of the jihad around the world and
never connects the dots between the violent events.
Fear: fear is the tool that the abuser uses to control the victim.
Islam has used fear against the Free since day one. The first
person Mohammed had assassinated was an artist who mocked
him. Any public critic of Islam lives in fear.
Fear: the attacker will return.
When and where will the next attack occur?
Guilt: the victim finds a way to blame himself/herself.
It is our fault. We have not treated Islam in the right way.
Branded: the victim does not want others to find out about the crime
 We do not teach the history of a million Europeans taken as
slaves by Islam. We do not teach the history of the jihad against
Hindus, Christians, or Buddhists.
Humiliation: the victim feels shamed. The things that led to the
abuse are hard to talk about.
The victims of jihad in the American immigrant community do
not want to talk about the brutality that made them flee to
America. Survivors are not bold. They are a beaten people.
Lack of control: during the attack the victim was helpless. This
helplessness extends to dealing with the problem.
Where is the person who is optimistic about what can be done
to deal with political Islam?
Anger: anger toward the attacker can be healthy. But frequently the
anger turns inward.
Notice the rage and hatred in politics since 9/11. Everything is
personal, hateful, mean and spiteful. We don’t discuss ideas; we
assassinate character.
Powerlessness: things will not get better.
Pessimism about dealing with Islam is the note of the day.
The Abuser
The traits and characteristics of the abuser are well
documented.
Denial: the abuser denies that the abuse ever took place.
Muslims do not acknowledge any of the crimes committed in
the name of Islam. Anyone killed by jihad was killed in self-
defense.
Inadequacy: Abusers are arrogant and overly self-confident.
Islam is never wrong. Muslims are the best of people
according to the Koran.
Domination: The word Islam means “submit.” The abuser
expects submission on the part of the victim.
Inability to understand or recognize the problem: the abuser is
the last person to admit he has a problem.
 Islam has never accepted any responsibility for its 1400 year
history of slavery.
Manipulation: the abuser wants to make the victim feel guilty.
Islam is presented as the victim. As an example, all of the
Palestinians’ problems are caused by Israel.
Obsessed with weapons: Have you ever noticed all the swords
on Islamic flags and seals? The AK-47 rifle is a symbol of Islam.
What is the most divisive issue in today’s politics? - The war in
Iraq. And what is Iraq really about? - Political Islam. The Web has
a video claiming that the CIA and Bush planned and executed
September 11. Cultural self-loathing is the watchword of our
intellectuals and artists.
We hate ourselves because we have been mentally molested
and abused. Our intellectuals and artists have responded to the
abuse of jihad just as a sexually abused child or a rape victim
would respond. We are quite intellectually ill and are failing at
our job of clear thinking. We can’t look at our denial.
We Must Learn the Doctrine of Political Islam
Political Islam has annihilated every culture it has invaded or
migrated to. The total time for annihilation takes centuries, but
once Islam is ascendant, it never fails. The host culture disappears
and becomes extinct.
We must learn the doctrine of political Islam to survive. The
doctrine is very clear that all forms of force and persuasion may
and must be used to conquer us. Islam is a self-declared enemy of
all unbelievers. The brilliant Chinese philosopher of war, Sun Tsu,
gave us the dictum --know the enemy. We must know the doctrine
of our enemy or be annihilated.
Or put another way: if we do not learn the doctrine of political
Islam, our civilization will be annihilated just as Egypt’s Coptic
civilization was annihilated.
Since unbelievers must know the doctrine of political Islam to
survive, CSPI has written all of its books in simple English. Our
books are scholarly, but easy to read. As an example, anyone who
can read a newspaper can pick up A Simple Koran and read and
understand it. It is not “dumbed down” and contains every single
word of the original. Not only is the language simple, but logic
has been used to sort and categorize. Context and chronology
have been restored. The result is a Koran that is an epic story
ending in triumph over all enemies of Allah.
Islam declares that we are the enemies of Allah. If we do not
learn the political doctrine of Islam, we will end up just like the
first victims of Islam—the tolerant, polytheist Arabs of Saudi
Arabia who became the Wahabis (a very strict branch of Islam) of
today, the most intolerant culture on the face of the earth.
Where we are today
We are coming to the end of the first stage of our strategy.
Since 9/11 we have had intellectual warriors who have studied
Islam, built web sites, blogged and written books. We now know
the entire scope of Islamic doctrine and the biggest elements of a
repressed and denied history of the dhimmitude, and annihilation
of cultures. We now know the enemy and this is a mark of our
success.
Our enemy is the civilization of dualism. The ultimate nature
of Islamic civilization is duality. Dualistic Islamic ethics and
politics propose one behavior for Muslims toward Muslims and
another behavior toward the unbelievers (kafirs). Islam has
declared that the civilization of dualism must annihilate that
civilization which is based upon a unitary view of humanity—
ours.
We now know that there is no such thing as having Islam as
part of our society. It is logically impossible for a civilization
based upon a unitary view of humanity to co-exist with a
civilization based upon duality.
History confirms that submitting to Islam means that every
aspect of the targeted civilization must cease to exist. And it
works 100% of the time. There is no such thing as a culture that is
only partially Islamic. The evidence is exquisitely clear. Over
enough time, annihilation is the common fate of all cultures that
tolerate Islam. A little Islam is like a little cancer. Not a problem
now? Just wait.
 For a people who have been raised with an ignorance of
political Islam, we have made incredible strides. Remember we
had only apologies from those who should have been our first line
of defense—our artists, intellectuals, media and the educational
system. In a sense, we have started at less than zero.
We should all stop, take a deep breath, look at what we have
done and congratulate ourselves for completing the first stage:
Know the Enemy. Then we need take another deep breath and get
back to work.
Strategy
Now that we know the enemy, it is time to look at our grand
strategy.
If we are to survive, we must have a strategy for war. Our
moral purpose for war must be the salvation of our precious
civilization. Our war is to save our very selves.
This cannot be accomplished without the Mind of War. There
is a psychology of war that puts everything in a different
perspective. We are rich, fat, dumb and happy living in the land
that everyone wants to migrate to. It is easy to turn on the Super
Bowl, plan the bar mitzvah, work for a promotion and just let
Islam have its way. The Mind of War sees that all of what we have
is an illusion; that the cancer has started to metastasize. Until we
develop the Mind of War, we are doomed. We must have that
emergency reserve that war brings out.
Without war, we will lose all we have. The great civilization of
Coptic Egypt of the Pharaohs that lasted thousands of years, is
gone, a corpse buried beneath political Islam. Liberal democracy
is only 200 years old. Political Islam is 1400 years old and
exploding in power. Without the Mind of War, our civilization
will become extinct under the impact of the civilization of duality.
Our Dhimmitude
It’s bizarre. We outnumber the Muslims by four to one. We are
afraid of them, they are not remotely afraid of us. Why is this? We
are in a psychotic state of fear and shame caused by a past of 1400
years of dhimmitude and slavery. This psychosis is the state of the
molested mind. The horror of Islamic politics produces a denial
that the deaths, conquests, slavery, rape, humiliation,
degradation, suffering and civilizational destruction ever
happened. The molested mind denies the history and doctrine of
political Islam. That is the mind of dhimmitude.
Our civilization must acknowledge our status. We are still
dhimmis. It has been 1400 years of servitude, slavery,
dhimmitude, ignorance and a repressed and denied history.
When we understand our history, we will see exactly how
repressed and in denial we are. The first mark of the dhimmi is
ignorance of political Islam.
We must acknowledge our suffering. We must decide that
270,000,000 of our ancestors did not die in vain. We must gain
insight into why we know so little. There is a very deep reason in
our collective psyche why we choose to remain ignorant. We are
afraid to admit our dhimmitude and slavery to political Islam. A
million Europeans were captured and sold into Islamic slavery. If
the history of slavery were completely told, whites and blacks
could see each other in a new light. Islam has enslaved us both.
In the past this shame, ignorance and fear could be ignored.
But now political Islam is here and has us by the throat. Our
future as a civilization depends upon realizing how close to
annihilation we are. Only a revolution can save us. We must have
a revolt of the dhimmis, a Dhimmi Revolution. After 1400 years it
is time we faced our shame and fear with the Mind of War.
This common suffering must be acknowledged and shared.
The history and stories must be told within our groups and
shared with the other groups. Once we know about the Tears of
Jihad, we will be strong and courageous. Once we remember the
suffering of dhimmitude, we can stop being afraid, adopt the
Mind of War and be heroes in the war to save our civilization.
Luckily, the cure for dhimmitude is very simple. Once you
know the history and doctrine of political Islam, you cease being a
dhimmi. Knowledge is the key and the only key to freedom from
shame and fear. We shall know the truth and the truth will make
us free. Our future depends upon our facing the past.
The Near Enemy
 The far enemy is political and ethical dualism. Islam is the far
enemy, but our worst danger is our near enemy - Islam’s
apologists. In the end, we will win or lose depending on how we
deal with our dhimmi leaders in the media, schools and politics.
Once we win the Dhimmi Revolution, winning the war with Islam
is possible. If we don’t win the revolution, our civilization will
become extinct.
And what is the nature of the near enemy - the apologists? --
Ignorance about Mohammed and political Islam’s history. Our
experience is that when an apologist learns the truth about the
doctrine and history of political Islam, the danger is revealed.
There are basically two kinds of knowledge about Islam—
knowledge of doctrine and knowledge of history. The full cure
requires both. There is a 1400-year-old history of slavery and
dhimmitude, so when you are curing ignorance with the history
of political Islam, there is a lot of history to choose from.
The political doctrine is much simpler. You can hold the
doctrine in one hand—Koran, Sira and Hadith. Although a
detailed knowledge about the Koran is useful, the most
powerful element of the doctrine is Mohammed. Mohammed is
Islam, so we must educate others about Mohammed - Islam’s
first politician and its sacred political model.
The Politics of the Dhimmi Revolution
But how do we make this knowledge about doctrine and
history of political Islam a tool in a political revolution?
We cannot win by writing another book, putting up another
Web site or blog. Those things are individual in nature. We must
move to the political phase. This means boots on the ground,
people meeting in the same room, people talking to people –
Politics, Groups, Meetings, Real people, not just computer screens
or books. We must have action against the near enemy in our
town. This is the battleground on which we will live or die as a
civilization.
It is impossible for individuals to win this revolution. Our first
step must be to build community. So how do we build
community? Of course, there are many ways to go about this.
Some people can build within a present group. An example
would be forming groups within a church or synagogue.
Conventions must be held to form strategies.
We must also build community out of strangers. We must
develop ways to meet others in our city. Larger communities must
be formed from the small communities. We need ways for
revolutionaries to learn what is going on with other groups to
learn from each other’s failures and successes.
A community should be formed out of those who have similar
functions with the revolution. As an example, writers should get
to know each other personally. Web site owners have common
problems and need to build community to deal with those
common problems. People who write letters to the editor should
get to know each other. Get the idea?
We have to start working in groups. A lion or tiger only kills
in about 10% of its attempts. Pack animals have a much higher
kill rate, about 90%. Do the math. Join the pack.
Our Divisions
We must face a fact about getting together in groups. Our
civilization may have the Golden Rule as its ideal moral law, but
let’s face it, we all fall short. We are endlessly divided with gripes,
feuds and sore history. Hindus don’t trust the Christians; blacks
have a grudge against whites, and so on. And there are further
divisions within each group.
We must face the political reality today. We either learn to
work together on a common political ground or become extinct
like Buddhism in Afghanistan. We must have ambassadors
between groups. If Protestant Christians get together to deal with
political Islam, they should invite Hindus and Orthodox
Christians. Their mutual history of suffering at the hands of
political Islam can be a starting point of a political community. On
this basis, we can talk and work together.
Dealing with Ignorance
Every columnist, politician, preacher, priest, rabbi, artist,
writer, professor, or correspondent who makes a statement,
comment or conclusion about Islam and does not make
reference to the death of 270,000,000 victims of jihad, to
dhimmitude, or to the doctrine of political Islam must be
challenged about their ignorance. Every leader in every area
must learn the history of dhimmitude, slavery and the life of
Mohammed. Once they know this, they will start to use the words
Mohammed and Allah when they speak about Islam.
The Dhimmi Revolution must get in all leaders’ faces and
confront them with their ignorance. This has to be without blame.
Our leaders are not stupid, but ignorant. And the reason they are
ignorant is they grew up in a culture where their teachers were
dhimmis, who submitted to Islam by remaining ignorant about
our history of dhimmitude. These leaders bear the burden of 1400
years of ignorance. Each of them shares the psychosis of the
molested mind -- a mind in denial and fear caused by the violence
of dualistic political Islam.
Our Dhimmi Revolution is about confronting ignorance. We
must first educate ourselves and then our political opponents, the
near enemy—the apologists.
Our strategy must deal with three of the near enemy—the
universities, the media and politicians. From a strategic
standpoint, they are similar. They are organizations that have a
small number of middle managers and leaders. This means
having a small target list to pressure, lobby and persuade. For
instance, a letter to the editor at a local paper should not only go
to the opinion page editor but up and down the chain of
command. Good information should permeate the organization.
Somewhere out there must be some software people who can
help us form community and spread information to the right
people. As an example: this type of software could be applied to
an ongoing letters-to-the-editor group. Fellow writers could
communicate with each other, build community and attract new
writers, select targets and have organizational e-mail lists of the
managers and leaders of the targeted organizations. Some of this
is being done today, but it must become organized, coordinated
and ongoing.
We must utilize the web for community, strategy, and attacks.
But we must also be in rooms with other people we recognize, be
with groups who visit politicians and others we want to influence
and persuade.
Teaching Ourselves
Some of us must start teaching those who want to know. CSPI
has seen that there are many who don’t want to read about the
doctrine or history of political Islam. It is too frightening and
depressing. But put them in a group and they love to hear about it
and ask questions. There is a change in the air. Some churches are
having lectures and classes. The few must teach the many. To take
part in the Dhimmi Revolution, you first take the antidote to
dhimmitude: knowledge.
Universities2
The universities are our number one target. Their influence is
felt by the politicians and the media. At present, the near enemies
own the schools. The state universities offer some special
opportunities. They are supposed to be in the business of
knowledge and they are supported by our tax dollars. We must
make demands that the schools teach the history of jihad
and dhimmitude, the Tears of Jihad.
We can use civil rights law suits that claim discrimination and
bigotry in the history departments. Imagine the uproar we can
make by insisting that the full history of slavery be taught. We
want all of this history taught, not just the West African limited
edition. We have to learn the history of white slavery, Hindu
slavery, and African slavery taught at the taxpayers’ schools. We
must know how dualistic Islam enslaved all races, religions and
cultures. Arabic has more words for slaves than any other
language. We demand the end of ignorance about the history of
political Islam. It is our civil right and we must use every means
possible to have the right to know our history of dhimmitude,
death and slavery, particularly in a state-funded school.
Universities are a constant forum for Islam. We need to have
groups, visit the campuses and ask good questions. We must
harangue, harass, pressure, and make visits to professors,
department heads, deans and pressure for full debate. The
department of humanities, women’s studies, history, political
science, African and Middle Eastern studies departments are all
target-rich environments. We must always push to have the full
and true doctrine of political Islam taught.
Politicians
That brings us to the politicians. We must use the politicians to
pressure the state universities. And that means that we must
pressure the politicians.
Their ignorance will be our point of attack. We must constantly
confront our leaders and show them the ways they speak and act
like dhimmis. We must show how there is a cure for dhimmitude:
it is the knowledge of the doctrine and history of political Islam.
Every politician must know that Islam is a political system; the
religion is only relevant to Muslims.
We must repeatedly bring up the lack of actual knowledge. We
must demand that all politicians know what Sharia law is and
what it means. We must demand that politicians learn the political
doctrine of Islam. We must demand they know what a dhimmi is.
The duality of Islamic ethics must be put before them. Every
politician should know the numbers killed in jihad.
Mohammed’s politics and character must be known. Once you
know who Mohammed was, the next Muslim who bends your ear
will be heard in a different tone. Every school board member,
council member, legislator, and any other elected official must be
visited and asked questions about his/her knowledge of Islam’s
first politician - Mohammed.
Shaming Ignorance
Any scholar of political Islam will tell you that it is easy to
learn about political Islam and Mohammed. What is the most
amazing thing about political Islam is the grotesque ignorance of
people who are otherwise well-read. We must shame our
professors, thinkers, politicians, and media types about this
ignorance.
We must also shame our artists and intellectuals regarding
their lack of knowledge about Mohammed’s persecution of artists
and intellectuals. Each time Islam kills and threatens another artist
or intellectual, we must attack the denial of our effete thinkers.
We must show the artists and intellectuals their ignorance and
dhimmitude and invite them to join the Dhimmi Revolution and
produce art to free their civilization from dhimmitude.
In the end the near enemy must understand that any
statement, comment or opinion made about Islam that does not
mention Mohammed or Allah is based upon ignorance. The
constant question that every Muslim must answer is: “What did
Mohammed do or Allah say?” It is the only question and we
must learn to answer it as well.
When we shame apologists for their ignorance, it must be
without rancor, but they must face that their opinions about Islam
reveal ignorance about our dhimmi history and the deaths of
270,000,000 victims of jihad. They are ignorant about the life of
Mohammed, the doctrine of political Islam. We must tell them:
“You can do better than this.” And when they comment again
without mentioning the history of Islam and its doctrine, we must
go back to them and say, “You are ignorant. You can do better
than this.” We must shame them.
We must not even address the apologist’s argument. Instead,
tell them that they may believe what they say, but if they knew
the history of dhimmitude, knew about the deaths of 270,000,000
and knew the doctrine of political Islam, their statements would
be different. We don’t ask that anyone change their opinion. We
do ask that they form an opinion that includes the knowledge of
the doctrine and history of political Islam.
These are strong objectives -- too strong to be accomplished by
individuals. Every politician should look up and see a small
group of many different kinds of people. There should not be a
single letter to the editor, there has to be a barrage of letters. To
win the Dhimmi Revolution, we must work as a community.
We have to address the frequent hope seen on the Web when
someone proposes a great legal solution to our problem about
political Islam. But no matter what the idea is or how good it is,
doesn’t matter. Let’s say that you feel that the Constitution should
be changed so that no Muslim can be a citizen. But where will you
get a vote in the House or Senate? CSPI is aware of only one
Congressman who has the slightest awareness about political
Islam. Before we can implement any political ideas, we must have
a political base. At this time we don’t need great solutions; we
need to prepare a trained political base before we can do
anything. We must take the Dhimmi Revolution to every
Congressman and every Senator and every state legislator before
we can get a single bill passed.
And in the End
The Dhimmi Revolution is to build community, know the far
enemy, and attack the near enemy.
In summary, we have finished the first stage of our struggle to
defend our civilization—know the enemy and its dualistic politics
and dualistic ethics. The age of individuals is coming to an end
and we must enter the phase of grass roots politics. We are too
weak and divided to attack Islam - the far enemy. We must first
attack the near enemy- our apologists for Islam- who are ignorant
about political Islam. The doctrine and history of Islam is the
weapon we can use to reveal the near enemy’s ignorance about
Mohammed. We must turn to building community so that we can
work in groups to do the necessary political work. We must
harness existing groups and create special interest groups
designed to carry the Dhimmi Revolution to the universities,
politicians, artists, intellectuals and the media.
First the Dhimmi Revolution, then the war
 Books by Bill Warner are available from
‘Center for Political Islam’ (CSPI)
[www.cspipublishing.com]

The Islamic Triology Series

Vol 1 - Mohammed and the Unbelievers (A Political Life)
Vol 2 - The Political Traditions of Muhammad
Vol 3 – A Simple Koran (Readable & Understandable)
Vol 4 – An Abridged Koran (Readable & Understandable)
Vol 5 – Mohammed, Allah, and the Jews
Vol 6 - Mohammed, Allah, and the Christians
Vol 7 - Mohammed, Allah, and Hinduism
Vol 8 - Mohammed, Allah, and the Intellectuals
Vol 9 - Mohammed, Allah, and Mind of War
Vol 10 - Mohammed, Allah, and Politics
Vol 11 – The Submission of Women and Slaves

A Taste of Islam Series

The life of Muhammad (The Sira) – Bill Warner
A Two Hour Quran – Edited by Bill Warner
The Hadith (The Sunna of Muhammad) – Bill Warner
Sharia for the Non-Muslims – Bill Warner
The Islamic Doctrine of Christians and Jews – Bill Warner
The Islamic Doctrine of Women – Bill Warner
The Doctrine of Slavery – Bill Warner

Other Books
A Self-study Course on Political Islam [3 Levels – 3 Books] – Bill Warner
Factual Persuasion (Changing the Mind of Islam’s Supporters)- Bill Warner
Can We Talk? (A Manual of Persuasion about Islam) – Bill Warner