EC2 Ch02a
EC2 Ch02a
Lecture 2
• Properties
Properties of concrete and steel
of concrete and steel
– Concrete: – Steel Bars
• Stress-strain curve • Tensile strength
g
• Compressive strength • Stress-strain curve
• Elastic modulus, Ec
• Shrinkage
Sh i k
• Creep
• Characteristics strength & design strength
Characteristics strength & design strength
• Characteristics loads & design loads
Typical Reinforcing Steel in a Structure
WWF
H10
Main bars
H32
WWF
H10 or H13
WWF for links
2
Reinforcing steel bars
Every steel is truly an alloy, but not all steels are
Every steel is truly an alloy but not all steels are
called "alloy steels". Even the simplest steels are
iron (Fe) (about 99%) alloyed with carbon (C)
(about 0.1% to 1%, depending on type).
(about 0.1% to 1%, depending on type).
Reinforcing bars use carbon steel. Carbon steels
are steels whose alloying elements do not exceed
the following limits
Element C Cu Mn P Si S
Max weight % 1.00 0.60 1.65 0.40 0.60 0.05
Stress
S
Yield Strength Tensile/yield
B500A Class Max Elongation
( N/mm2 ) strength ratio
B500A HA 500 1.05 2.5 %
B500B HB 500 1.08 5.0 %
B500C HC 485 1.15 < 1.35 7.5 %
Note: Grade 500 (500N/mm2 characteristic strength) has replaced Grade
250 and Grade 460 reinforcing steel throughout Europe.
The bar types are commonly identified by the following codes: H for high
yp y y g g
yield steel, irrespective of ductility class or HA, HB, HC where a specific
ductility class is required. Class HB is most commonly used for reinforcing
bars. Class HC has high ductility which may be used in earthquake design
or similar situations. Class HA (usually used in WWF) has lower ductility .
5
80% by
volume
Concrete Mix Design
• Proportioning the constituents to give the required
workability
k bili of the fresh concrete, the strength
f h f h h h & durability
& d bili
of the hardened concrete.
• The water‐cement (w/c) ratio is the single most important
factor affecting strength.
• For full hydration, cement absorbs 23% of its weight of
water so that the w/c ratio must be greater than 0 23
water, so that the w/c ratio must be greater than 0.23
• Practical w/c ratio ranges from 0.4 to 0.6.
6
W/C ratio is used to achieve the following attributes.
• Strength It increases with decreasing water/cement ratio
It increases with decreasing water/cement ratio
(minimum 0.23 to complete hydration of cement)
Tricalcium silicate + Water‐‐‐>Calcium silicate hydrate + Calcium hydroxide + heat
2 Ca3SiO5 + 7 H2O ‐‐‐> 3 CaO.2SiO2.4H2O + 3 Ca(OH)2 + 173.6kJ
Composition of Portland cement with chemical
composition and weight percentage
Cement Weigh
Chemical Formula
Compound t%
Tricalcium silicate 50 % Ca3SiO5 or 3CaO.SiO2
Di l i
Dicalcium silicate
ili t 25 % 2C O.SiO2
C 2SiO4 or 2CaO
Ca
Tricalcium
10 % Ca3Al2O6 or 3CaO .Al2O3
aluminate
Tetracalcium Ca4Al2Fe2O100 or
10 %
aluminoferrite 4CaO.Al2O3.Fe2O3
Gypsum 5% CaSO4.2H2O
• Workability ‐ It increases with increasing water/cement ratio
• Durability ‐ It decreases with increasing water/cement ratio
7
Specification of Concrete Materials
• Concrete strength is assessed by measuring the crushing strength of
cubes or cylinders of concrete made from the mix.
• Concrete of a given strength is identified by its ‘class’ – e.g. a Class
25/30 concrete has a characteristic cylinder crushing strength (fck) of 25
N/mm2 and cube strength of 30 N/mm2.
• Exposure conditions and durability can also effect the choice of the mix
design and the class of concrete.
• The concrete mix may either be classified as ‘designed’
The concrete mix may either be classified as designed or
or ‘designated’
designated .
8
Concrete Strength tests
1. Compressive strength fck
Grade 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50
Grade 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50
2. Tensile strength f
g fctk
Is about 10% of the cube strength. The splitting tensile
strength is 1.3-1.5 times
LOWER than the
flexural tensile strength
Split cylinder test Flexural beam test
9
Cylindrical sample size: 150mm
di
dia. x 350mm long
350 l
Stress
Note: Alternatively, cube
sample of 150mm x 150mm x
150mm concrete cube is used
0.0035
Strain
40
2
gth N/mm
30 Grade C30 concrete
Comprressive streng means concrete
attaining 30 N/mm2 at
20
28 days.
10
0
1 7 28 3 1 5
day days days months year years
Age of concrete (log scale)
Figure 1.3: Increase of concrete strength with age. Typical curve for a
concrete made with a Class 42
42.5
5 Portland Cement with 28 day
compressive strength of 30 N/mm 2
11
Modulus of Concrete
Since the stress-strain relationship is not linear, different moduli are defined
for concrete. The Secant Modulus is generally used in static design.
Ecm
fck/fck,cube
(kN/mm2) Tangent or dynamic modulus
C20/25 30
C25/30 31 Secant or static modulus
C30/37 33
C35/45 34
C40/50 35 Strain
C45/55 36
Figure 1.4: Moduli of elasticity of concrete
C50/60 37
Secant modulus Ecm ≈ 5000 √ (fck/0.8)
12
Effect of concrete shrinkage
g
Free Shrinkage Test ‐ Comparison of different
Mechanical Dial Gage
aggregate types through 365 days
aggregate types through 365 days Length Comparator
13
Reinforced concrete -
unrestrained
ε sc
Shrinkage forces adjacent to a crack
ε ct
Reinforced concrete -
fully restrained
Shrinkage strains
14
CONCRETE CREEPS
under sustained load
Creep
A Soiltest multi‐length
strain gauge set was used
to take creep readings
Short-term elastic from the metal tabs
from the metal tabs
1 2 3 4 5
Time - years
15
DURABILITY of concrete
- The durability of the concrete is influenced by
• the exposure conditions
• the cement type
• the concrete quality
• the cover to the reinforcement
• the width of any cracks
16
Limit state design
g
LIMIT STATES
‐ Ultimate:
Ultimate: collapse
buckling
overturning etc
g
‐ Serviceability: deflection
crackingg
durability etc
Other limit states that may be reached include:
• F ti
Fatigue – mustt be
b considered
id d if cyclic
li loading
l di is i likely.
lik l
• Fire resistance – this must be considered in terms of resistance to collapse,
flame penetration and heat transfer.
• Excessive vibration – which may cause discomfort or alarm as well as damage.
damage
• Special circumstances – e.g. earthquake resistance must be taken into account.
17
Limit state design
g
In assessing a particular limit state for a structure it is necessary to consider all the
possible variable parameters such as the loads, material strengths and constructional
tolerances.
Characteristic Material Strengths
Mean strength (f m )
gth (f k )
Numberr of test speciimens
cteristic streng
fk = fm − 1.64σ
Charac
1.64σ
Strength
Characteristic strength
iis the actual strength below which not more than 5% of the test
th t l t th b l hi h t th 5% f th t t
results would be expected to fail.
19
Stress‐Strain Curves of Concrete
For limit state design apply a partial safety factor γm for concrete
For limit state design, apply a partial safety factor for concrete
γm accounts for:
Characteristic strength f
Design strength = = k • Difference between actual and
f y γm
Partial ffactor off safety
l b t
laboratory‐determined values.
d t i d l
• Inaccurate assessment of the load
resistance.
Idealized stress‐strain
Idealized stress strain curve
curve
Note: 0.85 is ratio of flexural strength to
direct compression strength
fck
0.85fck /γm
Idealized curve for design (Fig 2.1, CP65)
20
The Stress‐Strain Curves for Steel
R i f
Reinforcement
γm = 1.15
fyk /γm
Actual stress‐strain curve Idealised curve for design
Steel is ductile
Steel is ductile Note: In BS 8110: 1997 γm=1.05
Note: In BS 8110: 1997, γ =1 05
21
Limit state design
g
Partial factors of safety for materials
22
Limit state design
g
Characteristic Loads
Characteristic load = mean load ± 1.64 standard deviation
[ Based on EC1 as appropriate ]
Characteristic loads
h i i l d are:
• The nominal loads act on the structures.
• They have a 95% probability of not being
exceeded during the life span of the structure.
Three common types of load:
Dead load, Gk (kN) or gk (kN/m or kN/m2)
Live load, Qk (kN) or qk (kN/m or kN/m2)
Wind load, Wk (kN) or wk (kN/m or kN/m2)
23
Si h i i d 30 / 2
FFor Singapore, characteristic speed = 30 m/s
wind pressure
Variation of Wind Velocity with
Distance Above Ground
Characteristic wind Loads
Uplift pressure on sloping roof; wind
speed on line 2 is larger than line 1
due to greater path length Increased
due to greater path length. Increased
velocity reduces pressure on top of
roof creating a pressure differential
between inside and outside of the
building.
Roof loading on the windward
side is a suction load for small
side is a suction load for small
angles θ and h/L ratios. Increasing
θ for a fixed value of h/L will lead
to the windward roof load being a
pressure load. Conversely,
l d C l
increasing h/L for a fixed θ will
result in a suction roof load on the
windward side..
Characteristic Earthquake Loads
An earthquake is a
A th k i sudden undulation of a portion of the earth’s surface. Although
dd d l ti f ti f th th’ f Alth h
the ground surface moves in both horizontal and vertical directions during an
earthquake, the magnitude of the vertical component of ground motion is usually
small and does not have a significant impact on most structures.
g p
LLateral Force Distribution due to
lF Di ib i d
Lateral Earthquake Motion
Partial factors of safety for loads
Design load = characteristic load x partial factor of safety
Design load = characteristic load x partial factor of safety (γ f )
Partial factors of safety for SLS: (γ f ) Accounts for:
design assumptions & inaccuracy
Permanent actions
i Variable actions
i bl i unusual load increases
unforeseen stress redistribution
1.0 1.0
constructional errors etc
Partial factors of safety for ULS:
Persistent or Transient Permanent actions (Gk) Leading Variable action Accompanying Variable
Design Situation (Qk,1) actions (Qk,i)
Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable
30
Limit state design
g
Example 2.1
p
Figure
g 2.2:Diagram
g for example 2.1
31
Limit state design
g
Example 2.2
p
170kN variable load
beam
permanent load 20kN/m
A B C
foundation
( )
(a) 6m 2m
1.5 x variable load
1.10 x p
permanent load
0 9 x permanentt load
0.9 l d
A B C
32
Limit state design
g
COMBINATION OF ACTIONS
• Examine different combinations to establish most critical design case
Adjust factored variable actions by further factor Ψ
¾ ‘Combination’ values ( similar probability as single action)
‐ ULS and SLS Ψ0
33
Combination of Actions
Ψ for different loading combinations
Table 2.4: values of
Action Combination Frequent Quasi-
permanent
Ψ0 Ψ1 Ψ2
Imposed load on buildings, category (see EN 1991 –1.1)
Category A: domestic, residential areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category B: office areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category C: congregation areas 07
0.7 07
0.7 06
0.6
Category D: shopping areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category E: storage areas 1.0 0.9 0.8
Category F: traffic area vehicle weight <30kN 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category G: traffic area 30kN,vehicle
30kN vehicle weight
weight,160kN
160kN 07
0.7 05
0.5 03
0.3
Category H: roofs 0.7 0 0
34
Limit state design
g
Combination of Actions ‐ Stability
B B
(a) (b)
Figure 2.4:Wind and imposed load acting on an office building
35