Lab Report 2 Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Lab Report 2 Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Abstract
Atterberg limits are a basic measure of the critical water contents of a fine-grained
soil, such as its shrinkage limit, plastic limit, and liquid limit. The group
performed standard practice in determining the liquid limit, plastic limit, and
plasticity index of a soil sample in accordance to ASTM D 4318. The calculated
liquid limit of the soil sample is 34, its plastic limit as 20, and plasticity index as
14. After analysis, the soil sample is recognized as clay of low plasticity based on
the USCS.
Group Mates:
Prince Charlie Intal
Vanessa Gale Marie Natividad
Carl Joshua Rebutiaco
Xerxes Tupag
1
I. Objectives
To determine the liquid limit, plastic limit, and the plasticity index of the soil
sample as prescribe by ASTM D4318: Standard Test Methods for Liquid
Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
To produce data within the acceptable range of errors as required by the lab
instructor
To analyze the sample using the results of the experiments and determine its
type based on the Unified Soil Classification System
II. Materials
a) Liquid Limit Test
Liquid Limit Device (Casagrande Cup)
Flat Grooving Tool
Gauge
Water Content Container
Mixing and Storage Container
Balance
b) Plastic Limit Test
Sieves (Number 40)
Glass Plate
Drying Oven
Containers with Lid
2
III. Methodology
START
Mix a portion of the retained soil sample with distilled water until smooth consistency
Sieve sample in a 425µm (No. 40) sieve Prepare the materials
for liquid limit test as
stated in Section 2
NO
Calibrate Is the Casagrande Cup calibrated?
the
device
YES
Form a groove in the soil by Lift and drop the cup at the rate Verify that the air bubbles
using the grooving tool. Ensure of two drops per second using did not caused any
that the separation between the crank of the device until the premature settlement by
soils is in the required two parts of the mixture come looking if the groove closed
dimensions. together at the distance of together at almost the
13mm. Make sure to count the
number of drops until it reaches
this stage.
NO Count the number of Drops
YES N
YES Did the grove
closed
Is the number of drops between 20
and 30? prematurely?
Record the number of drops
NO
NOof known mass, and then record the mass of wet soil and the containe
Secure half of sample in the cup on a container
Adjust the number of drops to close the gap by adding water to lessen the number and wi
NO
YES
Is the number of
drops between 15
YES Have complete
and 25? data for all trials? NO
YES
Proceed to Plastic limit Test
3
Add more soils to the soil-water mixture left until you can form the soil into a clay and it does not stick into your hands
Proceed to Plastic limit Test
Secure 2 grams
of sample from the
clay
YES
4
IV. Data and Results
The data acquired for the liquid limit test it given in the table below:
After repeating this computation for trials 2 and 3, the table below was generated:
1 33 31.82
2 21 33.33
3 18 37.93
Table 2. Number of drops and the corresponding water content for each trial
The relationship between the water content, w, and the corresponding number of
drops, N, of the cup was plotted on a semi-logarithmic graph with water content as the
ordinates and arithmetical scale, and the number of drops on the abscissas on a
logarithmic scale as shown in Graph 1. The best fit straight line through three trials
was plotted and the liquid limit of the soil sample is the water content at 25 blows.
5
Liquid Limit Analysis
50.00
45.00
Liquid Limit
40.00
Water Content
We will use the equation of the line in order to find the exact value, that is:
where w𝑛 is the water content at N blows. Inputting the value of 𝑁 = 25, we get:
The data acquired for the plastic limit test is given in the table below:
Using Equation 1, we get the corresponding water content in the two trials which are:
Mass of Mass of
Water
Trial Soil (wet), Soil (oven
Content (%)
g dried), g
1 6 5 20
2 6 5 20
Table 4. Simplified table of data acquired for the plastic limit
test along with corresponding water content
6
The plastic limit is the average of the water content for the two trials in which in the
given experiment is 20.
The plasticity index of the material is computed by finding the difference between the
liquid and plastic limit as shown in Equation 3.
𝑃𝐼 = 𝐿𝐿 − 𝑃𝐿 [Equation 3]
where 𝑃𝐼 is the plasticity index, 𝐿𝐿 is the liquid limit, and 𝑃𝐿 is the plastic limit. All
values that will be used are in whole numbers. Substituting the values calculated the
plasticity index is then:
𝑃𝐼 = 𝐿𝐿 − 𝑃𝐿 = 34 − 20 = 14.
7
The plastic limit (PL) is determined by rolling out a thread of the fine portion of a soil
on a flat, non-porous surface. If the soil is at moisture content where its behavior is
plastic, this thread will retain its shape down to a very narrow diameter. The sample
can then be remolded and the test repeated. As the moisture content falls due to
evaporation, the thread will begin to break apart at larger diameters. The plastic limit
is defined as the moisture content where the thread breaks apart at a diameter of 3.2
mm. A soil is considered non-plastic if a thread cannot be rolled out down to 3.2 mm
at any moisture. Plastic limit is also the lower limit of the plastic state. Thus, a small
increase in moisture above the plastic limit destroys cohesion of the soil.
Table 5 shows the typical values of liquid and plastic limits of soils in the laboratory.
Plasticity index is an important parameter that can be used to classify soil. Soils that
have high plasticity index are considered to tend to clay. Adding even modest
quantities of water to such soils may cause unusually large and frequent slope failures.
If this value is in lower range the soil tend to silt. In case of zero value, soil are
considered to have little or no clay and silt and called non-plastic soil. A low plasticity
index is indicative to have high organic matter in soil. Soil plasticity is also a field
indicator of slope stability. The engineering concept of soil plasticity has evolved to
explain why some soils are more failure prone than others. Graph 2 shows the
plasticity chart for USCS, in which will be used to classify the type of soil sample in
the experiment.
8
Graph 2. Plasticity Chart for USCS to identify the type of soil based on its Atterberg limits
Using the Atterberg limits of the soil sample found in the simplified Table 6, it can be
seen that the soil used in the experiment is classified under CL or clays with low
plasticity (lean clays).
Liquid Limit 34
Plastic Limit 20
Plasticity Index 14
Clays are known to be the plastic fines. They have low resistance to deformation
when wet, but they dry to hard, cohesive masses. Clays are virtually impervious,
difficult to compact when wet, and impossible to drain by ordinary means. Large
expansion and contraction with changes in water content are characteristics of clays.
The small size, flat shape, and mineral composition of clay particles combine to
produce a material that is both compressible and plastic. Generally, the higher the
liquid limit of a clay, the more compressible it will be and at the same liquid limit, the
higher the plasticity index, the more cohesive the clay. The clay used in the
experiment probably contains high amount of silts that affects its plasticity and
making it not to compressible as compared to clays with high plasticity. Lean clays
easily turns into mud as compared to fat clays and hence the careful analysis in the
planting the foundations is more needed.
9
As can be seen in Table 5, the soil sample with liquid limit value of 34, almost
exhibits the same liquid limit as the silts although it was been classified as clay under
the USCS. As stated in the previous paragraph, soils with relatively low liquid limit
tend to destroy the cohesion with soil particles and become muddy upon addition of
little amount of water. Plasticity limit value of 20 is also similar to the most silt which
corresponds to low cohesiveness. Cohesion is the result of the magnetic-like attraction
of particles; it resists the shearing of a block of soil. Highly plastic clays have most
cohesive shear strength, however silty clay or clays with low plasticity exhibits both
fair cohesive and frictional strength. Permeability varies with the particle size but
because silty clays are composed of both silts and clays which vary in size, clays with
low plasticity tends to be impervious when compacted.
As a summary, Table 7 presents the quality of the clay with low plasticity as
discussed in this section:
Important Property Description
Workability as
Good to
Construction Material Fair
Permeability when
Impervious
Compacted
Table 7. Important properties of the lean soil
10
VII. References
1. American Society for Testing and Materials. D4318 -1: Standard Test Methods for Liquid
Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. E-book.
2. Prof. Krishna Reddy. Engineering Properties of Soils Based on Laboratory Testing:
Experiment 7 Atterberg Limits. E-book.
3. Hardy Bartle. “What is soil plasticity? How does it allow you to prevent slope failures?”.
Published by B.C.’s Watershed Restoration Technical Bulletin. E-book.
4. United States Department of Agriculture: Soil Conservation Service. Engineering Field
Manual. E-book.
5. CivilBlog.Org . “LIQUID LIMIT OF SOIL – WHAT, WHY & HOW?” Published March 8,
2015. Retrieved March 8, 2016 at civilblog.org/2015/03/07/liquid-limit-of-soil-what-why-
how/
11