Chapter 3 Ionometallurgy Processing of Metals Using Ionic Liquid
Chapter 3 Ionometallurgy Processing of Metals Using Ionic Liquid
1039/9781849737340-00059
CHAPTER 3
Ionometallurgy: Processing
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
59
View Online
60 Chapter 3
metal in the ore, its chemical form and the value of the metal. Metals can be
split into four main categories:
rare earth metals, such as La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy and Lu;
precious metals, such as Ru, Rh, Ag, Pd, Re, Os, Ir, Pt and Au.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
The abundance of the rock forming metals is about 103 to 104 times larger
than the industrial metals, 105 to 106 times more than the rare earth elements
and 109 to 1010 times larger than the precious metals. Extraction of rock
forming metals tends to be by using pyrometallurgy or electrometallurgy and
the technologies are relatively mature. Metal concentrations in workable ores
can be as low as 1 to 10 ppm, so the large volume of waste created, in both
liquid and solid form, is a significant issue in metal processing. Finished
metallic objects tend to be processed using low temperature aqueous solutions,
for example pickling, polishing, anodising or plating and this can also result in
large volumes of dilute waste. Commonly used processing steps for metal
extraction and recovery are shown in Figure 3.1.
The dissolution/melting step is dependent on the chemical state of the metal
in the source material. If the source material contains the metal in an ionic form
it can be introduced into the solution by acidic or basic digestion methods in
either salt melts or aqueous solution. In the case of very insoluble salts, the
anionic component can sometimes be removed by oxidation, for example
digestion of sulfides by oxidising acids. If the sample is already in the metallic
form, like it is in the recycling of metal scrap, it needs to be dissolved either by
electrolytic or by chemical oxidation.
Figure 3.1 Flow chart showing steps involved in metallurgical processing of an ore,
metal or alloy.
View Online
protons act as good oxygen acceptors for metal oxides and HNO3 and H2SO4
are good oxidising agents for metals or sulfides. In some cases the medium
chosen for extraction (the lixiviant) can be selective for a given fraction of the
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
sample. For example, for silver purification HNO3 is first added to extract the
base metals but it does not dissolve silver. Once the solution has been removed
concentrated HNO3 or aqua regia is added to digest the silver.
Once in solution, a variety of extraction techniques can be used to convert
the metal ions into either a metal or an insoluble salt. This process is shown
schematically in Figure 3.1. Electrowinning uses an electrode to supply the
electrons to reduce the metal ions in solution, in other words the opposite of the
anodic dissolution stage. The metal crystallises on the electrode surface and is
mechanically removed at the end of the process. Anodic oxidation and elec-
trowinning can often be carried out in the same apparatus and this is called
electrorefining. This is a common purification technique, for example for raw
copper. Cementation uses a chemical reducing agent, for example a sacrificial
metal like zinc, to exchange with the metal of interest in solution. Gold, for
instance, can be cemented from ammoniacal thiosulfate solutions using copper
as a sacrificial metal.2 Ion exchange uses an ionic polymeric resin which in the
case of metal extraction usually has acidic moieties. It exchanges the metal ions
for protons and binds the metal ions to the polymer support. The precipitation
of metal ions from solution requires the addition of a counter-ion which binds
to the cation to render it insoluble. An alternative technology is to use a
chelating agent in an immiscible solvent to extract the metal ions from a dilute
aqueous solution into a more concentrated (usually non-polar) environment.3
The chelating agents therefore contain a non-polar and frequently fluorinated
moiety to enhance solubility in low dielectric constant media.4
In order to compete against the high activity of water, that is to shift the
equilibrium to the product side, ligands must either form a strong bond to the
View Online
62 Chapter 3
63
View Online
64 Chapter 3
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
Figure 3.3 In each photograph, solutions from left to right, are MnCl2, CoCl2, FeCl2,
FeCl3, NiCl2, PdCl2, PtCl2, CuCl2 in (a) ethaline (b) water and (c)
concentrated HCl.
One specific issue associated with the extraction particularly of rare earth and
precious metals is the similar chemistry of the related and generally co-located
metals. The large demand for these metals in electronic, magnetic and catalytic
applications has pushed the extraction of ever leaner ore sources. Modern
techniques involve processes such as in situ leaching. Ores such as copper
carbonate and uranium oxide are leached using acid or carbonate solutions.5
This can clearly lead to pollution of ground water, co-dissolution of heavy
metals and destruction of delicate ecosystems.
Separation of mixed metal solutions can be achieved either at the digestion step
or any of the recovery steps owing to differences in redox potential, speciation
(charge or ligation) or solubility of the various metal-containing species.
66 Chapter 3
13
the alkyl chain length on the cation increases. A range of ionic liquids with
low eco-toxicity are now available and some have been applied to metal
extraction. The versatility of the ionic liquid design has meant that benign
cations have been produced and these include functionalised imidazoles to aid
biodegradation,14 lactams,15 amino acids16 and choline.17 Our group has
focussed on the last of these and taken them to the 102 to 103 kg scale for metal
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
processing.18
The physical properties of ionic liquids span a wide range, for example
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
density 1.00–2.40 g cm3, viscosity 5–20 000 cP, mp 40 to 100 1C and the
properties change with temperature more than most molecular liquids.19
However, the viscosity of ionic liquids is considerably higher than that of
most molecular liquids and this will be a significant issue for industrial scale-up.
As a consequence, although most texts state that most ionic liquids
have relatively high conductivities, they do in general fall in the range
0.1–50 mS cm1. This is considerably lower than aqueous acidic solutions
which are in the range 100–500 mS cm1 and is particularly important for the
electrowinning step of the recovery.
The other important parameter is naturally one of cost which is harder to
quantify as process scale is the controlling variable. It is however easy to
speculate that the cost of most aqueous lixiviants will be in the range 1–10 h per kg,
whereas the most optimistic projections for ionic liquids would put the cost in
the region 10–100 h per kg. This clearly affects the areas into which this tech-
nology will reach. This also dictates that a recycling stage is essential and this
must include at least 10 cycles for the process to be viable.
Ionic liquids are not a metallurgical panacea and they are not inherently
green, however, through judicious design of the appropriate lixiviant they have
the potential to introduce improved selectivity for some difficult to separate
systems. This therefore offers the ability to decrease environmental emissions
and energy consumption through process intensification. The most probable
application will come where ionic liquids decrease the number of processing
steps and the volume of lixiviant or where they are used primarily for high value
metals. Potential candidates include platinum group metals, rare earth metals
and trans-uranic elements.
The requirements of a medium in which to carry out metallurgical processing
are:
With over 1018 ionic liquids available20 and 102 available on a commercial
scale it is pertinent to investigate properties systematically in order to predict
suitable solvents for given applications. The cation tends to dominate the
View Online
physical properties of an ionic liquid, whereas the anion controls the chemical
properties. By selecting the appropriate anion–cation combination, a liquid
with suitable chemical and physical properties can be produced. This does not
simply allow the ultimate solvent to be created since physical, toxicological and
financial constraints have to be considered. It is, however possible to identify
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
68 Chapter 3
Table 3.3 Summary of metal digestion and extraction studies using ionic
liquids.
Complexing
Metal species Ionic liquid agent/oxidant Reference
Digestion
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
solvents which does not make sense either from an environmental or a financial
point of view.
One aspect of ionic liquids which has gained considerable attention is the
ability to engineer the architecture of the anion or the cation to make it specific
to the solution species with which it is designed to interact. As a concept,
Davis26 is credited with task-specific ionic liquids (TSIL) where the liquid
plays a dual role as both solvent and complexing agent. Many studies
have chosen to functionalise the cation, primarily because the chemistry is
relatively easy. It could be as simple as taking a ligand with an amine func-
tionality and quaternising it. The simplest functionalised cation is beatine
HOOCC2H4N1(CH3) where the carboxylate functionality is an effective
complexant for a variety of metals. Nockemann et al.27 used the bistriflamide
salt to extract a variety of metals from aqueous solutions. They showed a useful
temperature induced phase behaviour which improved extraction efficiency
although ionic liquid loss in the aqueous phase is a significant issue.28 Other
classical complexants such as monoaza-crown ether fragments29 or urea- and
View Online
anions tend to complex the metal and therefore control the chemistry.
Probably the most studied area is that of lanthanides and actinides as the
facile separation of uranium from fission products is one of the most pressing
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
70 Chapter 3
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
Figure 3.4 (a) Nickel alloy rod (left) before and (right) after anodic oxidation in a
DES. (b) shows the DES after digestion.
electron but also a proton or OH ion. This is clearly not an issue in aqueous
solutions but in aprotic ionic liquids common oxidising agents have not been
studied. In metal digestion it is important to have a pure electron transfer
oxidant that is not metal based. Oxidants such as H2O2 would become involved
in the complexation and oxidants such as Fe(III) salts would complicate the
extraction of metals at the end of the process. These restrictions rule out the
majority of commonly used oxidants. Trihalide anions have been studied in
ionic liquids with some success.
We have used I2 as an oxidation catalyst for the digestion of metals in DESs.
This was found to be ideal as there is a simple electron transfer where there are
no complex side products and iodine does not oxidise the ionic liquid, which
bromine, for example, would. I2 partitions very effectively into DESs owing to
the high concentration of Cl which produces I2Cl. The high solubility of I2 in
the DES can be seen clearly in Figure 3.5 where organic solutions, each
containing 0.5 M I2, were placed in contact with a DES consisting of choline
chloride : ethylene glycol (ethaline) (1 : 2 ratio respectively). All of the organic
solvents are effectively decolourised and the iodine partitions into the ionic
liquid. The redox potential of the I2/I couple is more positive than would be
expected from aqueous electrochemistry and it is above the oxidation potential
of most metals, including gold. This has led to the practical application of
stripping gold from microfossil scanning electon microcopy (SEM) samples.52
Iodine can therefore act as an effective oxidant for most metals. Experiments
have also attempted to use bromine, which oxidises the solvent constituents in
DESs but may be suitable for use with more redox-stable ions. The trichloride
View Online
Figure 3.5 Partition of iodine between the DES ethaline and a variety of non-polar
organic solvents.
Figure 3.6 Diagram of the recovery of alloys using iodine as the oxidising agent in a
solution of ethaline.
anion, Cl3 has even been reported to be a breakdown product of ionic liquids
and may exist in media with high ionic strength.53
This has led to its use as an oxidation catalyst for the digestion of metals and
particularly alloys. Ionic liquids effect a change in the relative redox potential of
metals owing to differences in solution speciation. This can enable systems to be
designed in which all the metals in an alloy can be digested using iodine and one
of the metals can then be retrieved by electrowining from the solution. The use
of iodine effectively avoids having to establish electrical contact between the
anode and the metal. Anodic reoxidation of iodine in solution is very fast. This
has been successfully achieved for a variety of alloys and is shown schematically
in Figure 3.6.
3.7.3 Solubility
In aqueous solutions approximate rules exist for the solubility of metal salts,
for example most hydroxides, sulfides and carbonates tend to be insoluble,
View Online
72 Chapter 3
whereas halides, nitrates and acetates tend to be soluble with only a few
exceptions. Many of these general rules are pH and electrolyte dependent owing
to speciation, for example silver chloride is notoriously insoluble in water
owing to the high lattice energy compared to the energy of solvation, however
in concentrated HCl or chloride-based ionic liquids, AgCl is soluble owing to
the formation of AgCl2. This phenomenon could be thought of as a salting-in
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
74 Chapter 3
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
Figure 3.7 Plot showing the correlation between redox potentials in water and the
chloride-based DES ethaline.
Biphasic extraction usually leads to the transfer of an ion from the ionic
liquid to the aqueous phase and the metal complex is taken up by the ionic
liquid. Methodologies for large scale cleaning of ionic liquids are not
given in the open literature although some are clearly known from the
handful of processes which are already carried out on a scale in excess of
1 tonne.
76 Chapter 3
3.9 Conclusions
Ionometallurgy is a method of controlling the dissolution and recovery of metal
species from solution by dominating the environment surrounding the metal
cation with ionic species. It circumvents issues where metal separation and
solubility are limited by aquo-controlled speciation. The main areas of appli-
Published on 18 July 2013 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781849737340-00059
cation appear to be for precious metals and rare earth metals primarily because
of the cost of the liquids but also due to the potential simplification of process
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA on 31/10/2013 06:35:14.
References
1. A. P. Abbott, G. Frisch, S. J. Gurman, A. R. Hillman, J. Hartley,
F. Holyoak and K. S. Ryder, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10031.
2. E. Guerra and D. B. Dreisinger, Hydrometallurgy, 1999, 51, 155.
3. H. Freiser, Acc. Chem. Res., 1984, 17, 126.
4. H. Mehdi, K. Binnemans, K. Van Hecke, L. Van Meervelt and
P. Nockemann, Chem. Commun., 2010, 234.
5. L. E. Murr, Miner. Sci. Eng., 1980, 12, 121.
6. D. A. Wright and P. Welbourn, Environmental Toxicology, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
7. V. T. McLemore, Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration,
Littleton, CO, USA, Basics of Metal Mining Influenced Water, 2008, 1.
8. K. Seddon, Nat. Mater., 2003, 2, 363.
9. P. Bonhôte, A.-P. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram and
M. Grätzel, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 1168.
10. A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris and K. S. Ryder, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007,
111, 4910.
11. H. Tokuda, K. Hayamizu, K. Ishii, M. Abu Bin Hasan Susan and
M. Watanabe, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 6103.
12. F. Stock, J. Hoffmann, J. Ranke, Stoermann, B. Ondruschka and
B. Jastorff, Green Chem., 2004, 6, 286.
13. J. Ranke, K. Moelter, F. Stock, U. Bottin-Werner, J. Poczubutt,
J. Hoffmann, B. Ondruschka, J. Filser and B. Jastorff, Ecotoxicol. Environ.
Saf., 2004, 58, 396.
14. N. Gathergood, P. J. Scammells and M. T. Garcia, Green Chem., 2006,
8, 156.
15. Z. Du, Z. Li, S. Guo, J. Zhang, L. Zhu and Y. Deng, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2005, 109, 19542.
View Online
78 Chapter 3
6, 313.
42. J. A. Whitehead, J. Zhang, N. Pereira, A. McCluskey and G. A. Lawrance,
Hydrometallurgy, 2007, 88, 1.
43. K. Fujinaga, K. Kozaka, Y. Watanabe, Y. Komatsu and J. Noro, J. Ion
Exch., 2007, 18, 374.
44. K. Kidani, N. Hirayama and H. Imura, Anal. Sci., 2008, 24, 1251.
45. U. Domanska and A. Rekawek, J. Solution Chem., 2009, 38, 739.
46. Y. Zuo, Y. Liu, J. Chen and D. Q. Li, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008, 47, 2349.
47. R. Lertlapwasin, N. Bhawawet, A. Imyim and S. Fuangswasdi, Sep. Purif.
Technol., 2010, 72, 70.
48. A. N. Turanov, V. K. Karandashev and V. E. Baulin, Solvent Extr. Ion
Exch., 2010, 28, 367.
49. F. Kubota, Y. Shimobori, Y. Baba, Y. Koyanagi, K. Shimojo, N. Kamiya
and M. Goto, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn, 2011, 44, 307.
50. V. V. Yakshin, N. A. Tsarenko, A. M. Koshcheev, I. G. Tananaev and
B. F. Myasoedov, Radiochemistry, 2012, 54, 54.
51. A. P. de los Rios, F. J. Hernandez-Fernandez, F. J. Alguacil, L. J. Lozano,
A. Ginesta, I. Garcia-Diaz, S. Sanchez-Segado, F. A. Lopez and
C. Godinez, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2012, 97, 150.
52. D. Jones, J. Hartley, G. Frisch, M. Purnell and L. Darras, Palaeontol.
Electron, 2012, 15, 2.4T.
53. K. Haerens, E. Matthijs, K. Binnemans and B. Van der Bruggen, Green
Chem., 2009, 11, 1357.
54. I. M. Alnashef, Adv. Mater. Res., 2011, 233–235, 276.
55. V. A. Cocalia, A. E. Visser, R. D. Rogers and J. D. Holbrey, In Ionic
Liquids in Synthesis, P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2nd edition, 2008, Vol. 1, 89.
56. C. L. Hussey, Pure. Appl. Chem., 1988, 60, 1763.
57. L. C. Branco, J. N. Rosa, J. J. Moura Ramos and C. A. M. Alfonso, Chem.
Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3671.
58. A. E. Visser, R. P. Swatloski, W. M. Reichert, R. Mayton, S. Sheff,
A. Wierzbicki, J. H. Davis, Jr. and R. D. Rogers, Environ. Sci. Tech, 2002,
36, 2523.
59. C. Chiappe, M. Malvaldi, B. Melai, S. Fantini, U. Bardi and S. Caporali,
Green Chem., 2010, 12, 77.
60. G. A. Snook, A. S. Best, A. G. Pandolfo and A. F. Hollenkamp, Elec-
trochem. Commun., 2006, 8, 1405.
61. J. Zhang and A. M. Bond, Anal. Chem., 2003, 75, 2694.
View Online