W334 How ke Thee Vol.33. No.6 2007 6H JOURNAL OF BEING UNIVERSITY OF ‘TECHNOLOGY Jun, 2007 push-over iA P—HS ESM ee a TREAD Hest EM, HON, CL ARTA BAER, AR 100022; 2. HINGE LATA, I AM 21501) SSE SPARE A SE HE pushover MME HE Me B-BOY HEM — ARN, AAR I IE HS SC MI as AR FRA RE A KY PA BE IB RAE 10 SR MRR, ih 4 MRCS, Rt PU A Pat RPE LIE fk HR EAE TCP RH aA ce FEIBIA: pushover SPF ABTA REAM AF MAR Sh A RE PRMS. TU 3121; T3133 SAREREB. A SLAMS. 0254 ~ 0037( 2007906 - 0587-05 FERRE RE HITT AR i IE EER A, SCRE ST HE A A. Be iE FAV EMD A BTR, Fa a HU AR J AT RR has 8 ARR AT, BT Ae 2 BEAN AS A A, ML GR I a, (EH iti te — EA Te Hh RI ET OU TERE, EAR mT. RCE HY CRA, AD, A TA ALTE PAS push-over WERT TA SAMA ta AR ik —- BARR, ES ROAR BPE As He AS RS a eH fd, ES 2 SRE PEMEUE FT ARINC aR PEL iets, CSE RAI A A EOE RRMA MH, Caw PMR RL ie RT LARPS LAFF RBIY, ARAL push-over SPT AU AL FRY SERIEEN Hg ROL 1 RSL es AE TE Ev TL HR A A, A OL LZ, RR, BE Hf ATS ALS REAIE,, LV push-over SFMT HUM WAKE AK. pushover HAMM 1 PARE SE SPS ATOPR I 45 1 7 SBR Ey eh ER A AL, RID I Fc SATAY IS 1 Se FH FPSB LE LR VDA A AR BA A HR FUSED ILE, SHR FE ACHR push over SA Ar th HE MDH, J: EL APM AD MZ—. AAR AF push over HHA ALAR SAAR E ET TILA DTH DO SSA NBER 2) OI” LIED HEA BE, 3) OP reeman FP Ai) (ASE 4) sO FAL SY A) HE FS), DLE S TRAP AER, RE 1 SEA AREA Se oh At em RU A RIS A A.D ERT G91 BY OLE hy 9 TS BEE 3, HEN 4 UREN 5 IEA LAE T DTT, (GE Sh TE RD He, Eh ‘HY L-AIFELLOUD-RE, ABUL ACE BPARSY ATRL HER WL A ART 1A a a TP, cH, 2006.04.09 ETT. A HAGE (50895410) PETIT. ANE CLOTS), B, REREAD ITA A, HLH588 doe Cok kee 2007 5 A RD 0S RH MR RT OA 2 I DT 2H, BPAY SSS square root of sum of squares) #5158 5 7S: 45:5) 4 Oe 90 FD BY ye BES CTE PE 1B ARP TERRE. 55 BERR AT BR ABLE A — A, fa Sag EHP A ‘SRS AS 2 USEF EA hE BH OY, FACE 6 s, LP AT ASR A FOS HE, SEM PU A, ERAT 65, tC mM “Ag RS hl FD 74 A eT HS FO MS A 2 BCBERY AF RD Ap HSE REPLI ARRAS 724 Ce He A a Pt J A A BT TER AY Hat AR FRG PF PE A a I SLSR VEY BT HAIL BA JL A EH RE DE BE A a, AE MR AL SS CE AN PR Nh TAT Li A A EA AR ST EET mi (ei) Ray, ELD a) Mon D (yy) BOB, Fy 58 5 PRA ALIN TR ; VEN NAPA Rs mm, ARIEL UWS 9, SER TED ERS FAY BRUT, Rj MEG ALL» AR MA RL Oe RIN ANE) Rg AHR, MRSS RZ ANAT 90%, SAULT 3 ALAN BY, ae At de eA tale im. 3 Rel AR AUR RAP i Hy HR A PL FFE DOT Fel RAS ACE PAR SP A HER, push-over JHE AT RS REL BE AG HUD UA AUR ETO A OLE 8 S12 E16 EAT 20 ae 4 PAC SSE AT OA SR A. SP TE SEY AST ASL GE A PL 2 HR AS), PT EE BE AR PL em. SP LPO 1 a TE AD, HE aE ERO AT A ARPA tak FT a A kB MBP PROSE AL TA. 4 ht AI SR d EB FRA 4,5 a FERIA Y 3.6 m,2 FEIT Wy 6.6m. $F 7 RN/m?, HFN 2KN/ mn? SHS = ELH WAS, FARE A 9 RE, RA STS ARE HE AT a att BES, 35H 97 GSO 1 as BP ls LO eH AR Be) B HHS SG AR HEA i BR NE MAL 2. a MAR A I A 0.62 3.1 AHERN as FRA ERR TARR F026 4 ME BY Aa OA iL HS FE EO) 3 ae HC AP BARA PRT A SL, AF A Yb AAR POA LE SE, a ya A EPR AL AG ADEA os 20 PT OR hs Be, RHR RD ALP TD aK, OE 3 PACHA PR ARS A RL A Be (ELI A AE Is, See HO EE DR I, BY ACHE 1) MEN BS TEP AY ee Se A DR TTA TO a. eater Fig. Evaluation of framesROM ___ PAIS psh-over et — A RB MND A RD A SS 589 BS RAAB A BEER CSE A A OJ To 2, 2 I ARAL Be (CA REINS OCH RMA TAL MESL 3 AAPL — Femi — Hrwie Ts Tis D2 AGAR BR Hp Fig.2 spectrum and average 8 spectrum of earthquake waves M veMN 1 7 dl él 25 5 gs za S3 23 2 | 1 1 o 03 06 09 13 Ts 0 02 04 06 OR 1012 Ta wm alm orient come HL HER? MRS Mate sts — sat 183 PURE HA DL A ae Fig.3 Base shear vs top displacement of diferent stories ‘EE 2 LAY HE LL SAR AST A RE AE — LK HA LE, ELST FN BA 4 4 GI 3 TY Hy IT EEE, RP HE Sh ey SARL BILE EBD ABA SH PRONE TE AE), BCR AIRS MO). I Sey PARLE A AO ED Hea I ES BB AEE] 2, ANITA Sb A A 2 HO HERMOSA RI LE ET (iC REA AD it Oy ak (BE EM ME TALI Ot, ER UAL RACE fi RT ATK 3.2 SORES STP FB i Jo ELA I HLT 99 A OTR, A, a GD Be AACR SUR A ATTA SHAT UP AREA, pushover 4 FRE ADGY Ef HAE EB A AE AAT oY BID BB PS PA PHYA A ER RAO ERR AMES EAU UEAT HEM SAT ME SR Sy A SPRITE RY PES ADS RAL EC, DARL 4B LAT 159 Sb CLR) (BI AS} ACHES 2), Freeman590 & Rok K Se * 2007 SPAS MARL 4) LLB ARAL Sh A Eh 5), TES PLE GA TSS TEE RBS, AS TA OP DeROSIER I LA J HN a ee BCG HA, eT AY SAAC, vs A eM, AE a, IS SA ETHEL OT, AP EAH AL BT BE I, SN Pg a ARPA GK tet — A RO TD RS DE THEME St IL, BAA BO EI. % . 6% owe (28 == HER + BOR 6G ote -- Hots at ne 4 RIP aT 0k 0 SA Fig.4 Distribution of interstory drift ratios of different stories PRE re 9b A ARR DA — se A TE Hn eB, Ce Se aR BB PELE AS HLA i 28 #9 FA a, (ER A SB ET RR A EK. 4 Hi PAAR ROG SF EP IY Bk 19 Nj HBC AE IL KO Ph A Ea HE ER AT A i Ne 2 Od EK PR SEK, 1) GSE RE 4 +7 EA A es, LO OK eR Ay RH HER RI ES AH SP BR, BB AC PSD AS AER AK OF A HD I A FARO EB AX FAL, XA A SUEY Ue A PAAR A, Le — A EE TT I 2 Wh] SEB push-over SBT TT ATE ATE HOR TTT EAE A AE 2) At a RAT LAE, 208 AAS ORE REL ASD, BL Sa PE Da PRP IM, RT A a RE EF 2 AR A Ye AK A EAT DE RESP AF eexm: (1) KRAWINKLER H, SENEVIRATNA G, Pros and cons of pushover analysis of seismic performence evsluation[1]. Engi peering Srtuctures, 1998, 20(1): 452-464 [2] ROT, ARE. NOL tht AT MNJ]. IRAE, 2001, 1705); 8-13, XIONG Xiang-yang, Ql Zhen-hue. The influence of lateral load pattems on the results of static push over analysis]. Build- ing Seience, 2001, 17(5)s 8-13. (in ChineseRom LE push over 71H — He BR ER AAR TS son [3] 6, PHER, EMM, AMEE HF (puch-overd MIAMIACMEL]. MTALIYEM, 2000, 2401); 44-50, YANG Pu, LI Ying-min, WANG Ya-yong, et al. A study on improvement of push-over analysis(J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2000, 21(1): 44-50. (in Chinese) [4] FEMA 273. NEHRP commentary on the guidelines fr the schsbitotion of buildings]. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1996. [5} JINKOO KIM, HYUNHOON CHOI, KYUNG-WON MIN. Pecformance-based design of added viscous dampers using 2 pacity spectrum metbed{J]. Journal of Barthquake Engineering, 2004, 7(1)+ 1-24 [6] VALLES RE, REINHORN A M, KUNNATH SK, etal. IDARC 2D version 4.0: 1 computer program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings 2] // Technical Report NCEER-96-0010), New York: National Center for Earthquake Engineer: ing Research, Stare University of New York at Buffalo, 1996. (7) BLE, SEF Mm HES RHEL TATE AAR). SRR, ARR Le RL AL BBE, 2008, ‘SUN Guo-hus. An improvement of push-over analysis method in performance based seismic design for high-rise steel frames [D]. Harbin College of Civil Engineering, Hasbin Institute of Technology, 2005. (in Chinese) (8) PEA SERUM EAB JG) 99—98 TE RE AR EHH UES). SEHK. PRR TULA MEAL, 1998, A Lateral Load Pattern Considering Higher Modes Influence in Push-over Analysis SUN Guo-hua!?, HE Ruo-quan'?, GAO Xiao-ying? (CL, College of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Beijing University of Technology. Being 100022, Chines 2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Seine and Technology of Sushou, Sushou 215081, Jiangsu, China) Abstract; Push-over method couldn’ t reflect the higher modes” influence on high-rise structure. Based on some important factors, such as story weight, story stiffness, mode participation ratio, etc., this paper developed a simple fixed lateral force distribution model, which the effect of higher modes can be considered In this paper, through fitting B spectrum for the third soil site, ten earthquake records were selected, and four moment-resisting steel frames were designed to analyze the push-over procedure and dynemie nonlinear time history procedure. Moreover, according to the index of story drift ratio, an improved fixed lateral force distri- bution was demonstrated. Key words; push-over analysis; higher mode influences lateral load pattern