FSG671 Corrected
FSG671 Corrected
•
•
•
•
1)
2)
3)
Various sizes
• Micropores (less than 2 nm) How biochar activated carbon
• Mesopores (2-50 nm)
• Macropores (greater than 50 nm) works:
Bambusa vulgaris
•
•
•
•
Bambusa vulgaris striata
(Marya et. al., 2020)
Application of
Moso bamboo (Chen et al., 2015)
Bamboo Biochar
Gigantochloa nigrociliata
(Water Treatment)
(Negara et. al., 2019)
Phyllostachys nigra
Source (Guadua Bamboo) (Scurlock et al., 2000)
•
•
Biochar Adsorbate Pyrolysis Activation Mass Dosage Time Adsorption Adsorption References
Condition Condition (g/L) Percentage Capacity
Biochar pellet Ammoniacal 800°C Slow pyrolysis 0.1-1.5 g 6-336 hours 92.2% 2.94 mg/g Shin et. al.,
/ pig manure Nitrogen 2018
Zeolite X/ Ammoniacal 65°C Hydrothermally 6 g/L 20 hours 92.2% 7.52 mg/g Zhang et. al.,
Activated Nitrogen treatment in 2017
Carbon NaOH
Activated Ammoniacal 200° and Washed with tap 100 g/L 60 minutes 90% 1.74 mg/g Turan and
Zeolite Nitrogen 250°C water and dried Mustafa, 2021
in oven repeated
time
Granular Ammonia 25°C Dilute with nitric 9, 18, 35, 53, 24 hours 58% 2.41 mg/g Hussain et.
activated acid and rinsed 71 g al., 2006
carbon with distilled
water, air-dried in
room
temperatute
Bamboo Ammoniacal 500°C Heating 500°C for 0.5 g 15, 30, 45, 60, 97.7% 1.416 mg/g This study
Biochar Nitrate 2 hours using 1.0 g 90, 120, 120,
Furnace 2.5 g 240 and 300
5.0 g minutes
Wash, dry, chop
Figure 4.1 shows the standard curve
of Ammonium Nitrate Solution vs
Absorbance of ammonium nitrate
solution
Figure 4.2 and 4.3 shows the graph plotted for concentration versus time of
ammonium nitrate solution.
(upper and lower nodes)
Highest absorbance of ammoniacal nitrogen is from upper nodes: mass dosage of 5.0 g at 60
minutes.
Absorbance: 0.889A
Cocentration: 5 mg/L
Ce/qe=1/qm Ke + Ce/qm
Langmuir Isotherm
25
y = 1.4873x - 1.6893
20 R² = 0.9937
Ce (mg/L)
Ce/qe
15 2.4
10 5.5
5 8.1
0 12.5
0 5 10 15 20
Ce 14.6
Figure 4.4
Table 4.1
So, the Langmuir isotherm fit the model
of adsorption with R-squared = 0.9937
qe Experimental qe Calculated
0.304 0.952
dq/dt= k1(qe - q)
0.58 0.89
0.876 0.838
1.1 0.75
Figure 4.5 1.416 0.708
Table 4.2
Figure 4.6
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Untreated Treated
Wastewater Wastewater
Ho, Y., & McKay, G. (1999). Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 34(5), 451–465.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-9592(98)00112-5
Jiang, J., Wang, Y., Yu, D., Hou, R., Ma, X., Liu, J., ... & Li, Y. (2022). Combined addition of biochar and garbage enzyme improving the
humification and succession of fungal community during sewage sludge composting. Bioresource Technology, 346, 126344.
Lima, J. Z., da Silva, E. F., Patinha, C., Durães, N., Vieira, E. M., & Rodrigues, V. G. S. (2022). Sorption of arsenic by composts and
biochars derived from the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes: Kinetic, isotherm and oral bioaccessibility study.
Environmental Research, 204, 111988.
Melekoglu, R., Ciftci, O., Cetin, A., Basak, N., & Celik, E. (2016). The beneficial effects of Montelukast against 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo- p -dioxin toxicity in female reproductive system in rats. Acta Cirurgica
Brasileira, 31(8), 557–563.https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020160080000009
Rodríguez-Vila, A., Selwyn-Smith, H., Enunwa, L., Smail, I., Covelo, E. F., & Sizmur, T. (2018). Predicting Cu and Zn sorption capacity of
biochar from feedstock C/N ratio and pyrolysis temperature. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), 7730-
7739.
Shin, J., Choi, E., Jang, E., Hong, S., Lee, S., & Ravindran, B. (2018). Adsorption Characteristics of Ammonium Nitrogen and Plant
Responses
to Biochar Pellet. Sustainability, 10(5), 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051331
Tong, Y., Wang, M., Peñuelas, J., Liu, X., Paerl, H. W., Elser, J. J., ... & Lin, Y. (2020). Improvement in municipal wastewater treatment alters
lake nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in populated regions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11566-
11572.