Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control

Volume 5 | Issue 2
ISSN: 2639-9288
Research Article Open Access

Arduino Use in Education Systems to Monitor the Noise in Schools Classrooms in

Qatar
El-Morhit M*

Laboratory of Microbiology, Research Team Health, Water and Environment, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University
Mohammed-V, Rabat, Morocco. Ministry of Education and Higher Education. Simaisma Secondary School for Boys, P.O. Box:
205098, Doha-Qatar

Corresponding Author: El-Morhit M, Laboratory of Microbiology, Research Team Health, Water and Environment, Faculty of
*

Medicine and Pharmacy, University Mohammed-V, Rabat, Morocco. Ministry of Education and Higher Education. Simaisma
Secondary School for Boys, P.O. Box: 205098, Doha-Qatar. Tel: 50619503, Email: [email protected]

Citation: El-Morhit M (2022) Arduino Use in Education Systems to Monitor the Noise in Schools Classrooms in Qatar. J Environ
Pollut Control 5(2): 201

Abstract

Many students suffer from the sound of air conditioners and others suffer from light intensity in classroom. The air
conditioners and light intensity affect the efficiency and quality of education. Urduino is used a lot in industrial areas
because there is a lot of noise pollution. Additionally, it can be used in high traffic regions as well as to monitor noise in
different parts of the city. It can also be used in education systems to monitor the noise in classrooms. The purpose of this
study was to monitor the noise in classrooms by Arduino Nano that interfaced with a Sound Sensor.

A study was conducted to determine the ambient sound and light intensity of a convenience sample at school during
September, October and November 2021. Six classrooms’ samples corresponding to hourly fractions of the average
sample broken down into the following periods: from 10:00 am to 2:50 pm. Sound levels were measured to assess acoustic
conditions. Light levels were measured to assess light conditions. Each classroom from 1 to 6 was tested the ambient sound
intensity and light using an Arduino.

Noise varies with time and place. The sound level varies between 27.5 dB and 65 dB with the average sound level in the
classrooms was 43.53 dB greater than recommended sound level limit of 35 dB. The light intensity varies between 62.50
lux and 208.5 lux. The average light levels around the recommended 300 lux. Everyone emphasized the quality of using the
device to measure the noise level in the classroom. The use of the device leads to monitor the noise of the air conditioner
or replacing it.

The device has the potential to significantly change the noise pollution monitoring system at school. Researchers
recommend all students and authorities the importance of the Arduino.

Keywords: Sound, Light, Pollution, Classroom, Arduino

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control 2

Introduction

Noise pollution is a problem that affects millions of people worldwide. Over the last few years, many researchers have devoted their
attention to the design of wireless acoustic sensor networks (WASNs) to monitor the real data of continuous and precise noise levels
and to create noise maps in real time and space [1]. Different studies have shown that noise pollution is currently one of the greatest
environmental threats to people’s health, leading to increased risk of cardiovascular disorders, hypertension, sleep disturbance,
stress, etc., and it is negatively influencing productivity and social behavior [2].

The Arduino platform is widely used in education of physics to perform a number of different measurements [3]. More, a wide
range of experiments and solutions are shown where sensors and the Arduino platform are used to teach physics efficiently and
attractively while the cost is kept very low [4].

The Arduino platform is widely used in physics education. It has low cost and many additional components are available. A lot of
application examples can be found in the papers, including building devices to measure temperature [5], pressure [6] and many
more in various experiments to teach physics attractively [7].

In an article at Make online, intitled, “Why the Arduino Won and Why It’s Here to Stay”. Another articles describe the world of
microcontroller development kits and how the Arduino has captured the hearts of many non-engineers [8].

We can use Urduino in industrial areas as there is a lot of noise pollution. It can also be used in education systems to monitor the
noise in classrooms. It can be used in heavily traffic regions as well as monitor noise in different parts of the city. Many students
suffer from the sound of noise pollution in classroom. The noise pollution affects the efficiency and quality of the education. What
drove many students thinking that can understand such a modern world around them. One may think that there are even more
Urduino use in education than before [7]. Several research works have reputed in very similar aspects. An earlier approach to noise
mapping proposed a smartphone based sensing [9]. Do excessive noise levels negatively affect the quality of life of students in
schools? The purpose of this study was to monitor the noise in classrooms by Arduino Nano that interfaced with a Sound Sensor.

Materials and Methods

Study Site

Presentation of Sampling Stations

The study employed an observational cross-sectional design conducted at Simaisma Secondary school for Boys. This area is located
in Qatar. It is the lowest populous city in Qatar. For our study, 5 stations with distributed along the school were chosen taking into
account various activities identified in the area (Figure 1).

Classroom 1: it is located upstream from the computer classroom.

Classroom 2: it is near the nurse’s classroom.
Classroom 3, 4 and 5: they are between the toilet’s professors and toilets students.
Classroom 6: it is near the supervisors’ classroom.

Geographical coordinates of stations of the Simaisma Secondary School for Boys and their characteristics were presented in Table 1.

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

3 Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control

Figure 1: Map of the study area and classrooms of sample collection in Simaisma secondary school for boys (Qatar).

Classroom Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Classroom 4 Classroom 5 Classroom 6

Longitude (E) 51°48'58" 51°48'57" 51°48'52" 51°48'48" 51°48'51" 51°48'56"
Latitude (N) 25°57'30" 25°57'33" 25°57'32" 25°57'39" 25°57'28" 25°57'32"
X Lambert 1.3852296 6.6681666 6.6094487 6.1954893 6.0522776 6.1522776
Y Lambert 4.8201278 2.3686218 4.3736238 1.3309864 1.0385157 1.2685157
Table 1: Geographical coordinates of classroom of the Simaisma Secondary School for Boys

For the study of the acoustics and light level of the Simaisma Secondary School for Boys, two physicals characteristics have been the
subject of a temporal and spatial monitoring: sound level and light level. Six classrooms selected and visited in Simaisma Secondary
School for Boys for three periods as soon as September, October and November during 2021 (Table 2).

Classroom Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Classroom 4 Classroom 5 Classroom 6

September 10H00 10H10 10H20 10H30 10H40 10H50
October 12H00 12H10 12H20 12H30 12H40 12H50
November 2H00 2H10 2H20 2H30 2H40 2H50
Table 2: Date of the campaigns and hours of sample collection

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control 4

Sampling and Sample Preparation

The sound and light samples were collected at the level of each classroom, during each campaign. In inside, the various parameters
were measured.

Analysis Method

The Arduino put in center in all classrooms during lessons. The classroom is far the noise of traffic on the road. Sound levels were
measured to assess acoustic conditions. Light levels were measured to assess light conditions. Each classroom from 1 to 6 was
tested the ambient sound intensity and light using an Arduino (Figure 2), and data was compared to the WHO value.

Figure 2: Arduino matrix used in Schools' classrooms

Results

The sound and light levels characteristics in schools' classrooms samples in north of Qatar are presented in Table 3. Noise presented
by sound and light levels varies with time and space.

Sound Levels (Acoustics)

In our study, the sound level varies between 27.5 dB and 65 dB with the average is 43.53 dB. Indeed, the lowest concentration (27.5
dB) was measured in classroom 6 during November 2021. While the highest (65 dB) was measured in classroom 5 during October
2021. More, for all classrooms, higher sound level (44 dB) was obtained at 10 am, and lower sound level (43 dB) was detected at
2 pm. This situation could be explained by the sound of the air conditioner that causes the problem for students during lesson.

Light Levels

But the light level varies between 62.5 Lux and 208.5 lux with the average is 128.50 lux. Indeed, the lowest light level (62.5 lux) was
measured in classroom 4 during November 2021. While the highest light level (208.5 lux) was measured in classroom 1 during
October 2021. The same, for all classrooms, higher light level (129 lux) was obtained at 10 am, and lower light level (128 lux) was
detected at 2 pm. This situation could be explained by the increase or decrease of the light level of the classroom.

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

5 Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control

2021 Classrooms Sound (dB) Light (lux)

1 44±1 103±1
2 45.5±2 167.5±2
3 49±1 104±1
Sept.
4 55±1 105±2
5 60±1 139±1
6 45±1 163.5±1
1 40±1 208.5±1
2 40±1 175±1
3 37.5±1 185±1
Oct.
4 45±1 145±1
5 65±1 72.5±1
6 35±1 97.5±1
1 40±1 120±2
2 40±1 70±2
3 35±1 122.5±2
Nov.
4 40±1 62.5±1
5 40±1 90±1
6 27.5±2 182.5±2
Min. 27.5 62.5
Max. 65 208.5
Mean ± S.D. 43.53±9.12 128.50±44.10

Table 3: Mean and Standard Deviation classroom sound and light levels in schools.

Everyone emphasized the quality of using the device to measure the noise level in the classroom. The use of the device leads to
monitor the noise of the air conditioner or replacing it.

Sound and Light Level Ranking

The general ranking of sound and light level in time was: October > September > November on the one hand. On the other hand,
the general order of monitored sound and light level was: 10 am > 12 am > 2 pm. And, the classroom sound and light levels followed
the order in Table 4. This order might be attributed to the different processes: The location of the classroom, the time and the others
indicators.

Classrooms Sound level Light level

September 5>4>3>2>6>1 2>6>5>4>3>1
October 5>4>1>2>3>6 1>3>2>4>6>5
November 5>4>1>2>3>6 6>3>1>5>2>4

Table 4: Classroom sound and light levels order

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control 6

Discussion

Sound Level

Qatar municipality recommended 35 dB sound level for effective teaching and learning environment [10]. However, average sound
level of 43.53 dB (with SD of ±9.12) was recorded for all the studies classrooms. The sound level measured in our study (43.53 dB)
was considerably lower than those previously reported in elementary schools' classrooms (59 dB with SD of ±7.1) in the United
Arab Emirates [11].

Walkthrough investigations were conducted to have in-depth understanding of issues that would contribute to measured acoustic
condition data. First, major indoor sources that would contribute to sound level include sound generated by air-conditioned
systems, mechanical fans, and unavoidable teachers’ and students’ activities. Second, high classroom sound level would increase
students’ fatigue during mental memory tasks and would also reduce their tolerance levels, performances, and learning abilities.
End, if teachers’ performances are compromised, knowledge transfer to students will be compromised. This has been noted by
several authors [12].

Light Intensity

Light level and quality would influence students’ learning and performance [13]. Illuminating Engineering Society of North
America (2000) (IESNA) recommended maintained average illuminance level of 300 lux at 0.8 m working level for elementary
school classrooms. Minimum and maximum, and mean of measured light condition for each of the studied classroom can be found
in Table 1. Indeed, the mean light level in each of the studied classrooms ranged between 62.5 lux and 208.5 lux. All classrooms had
lux levels less than the recommended 300 lux. The light level measured in our study (128.50 lux) was considerably lower than those
previously reported in elementary schools' classrooms (385 lux) in the United Arab Emirates [11].

Walkthrough investigations were conducted to have in depth understanding of issues that would contribute to measured light
condition data. Firstly, all studied classrooms did not have external window shading device that could prevent glare in the
classrooms. On the other hand, poor integration between interior and envelope systems would reduce the potential of maximizing
day light in the classrooms [11].

Sound and Light Standards Limits

All classrooms had average light levels (128.50) in the range of 62.5-208.5 lux. Theses classrooms had light levels around the
recommended 300 lux (Table 5) (USEPA air quality standards, IESNA lighting and book) [11]. Meanwhile the light level remains
near the limit. It is acceptable according to IESNA.

Parameters Present study Recommended threshold limit Quality

Sound level (dB) 43.53 35 Poor
Light level (lux) 128.50 300 Good

Table 5: Standards limits relating to the quality of sound and light levels in classroom at School

Poor lighting, or a complete lack of lighting (in the event of a power failure), may prevent students from seeing possible hazards
in education and especially at the laboratory experiments.

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

7 Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control

Conclusion

The device has the potential to significantly change the noise pollution monitoring system in classroom at school. This study has
shown that students in the studied classrooms were exposed to poor sound conditions. The sound level found in our study greater
than the limit makes the sound unusable for education’s classroom. But the light level remains near the limit. It is acceptable according
to IESNA. Light level and quality would not influence Students’ learning and performance.

Identified knowledge gaps should be bridged to create environmentally friendly and conducive learning environment for school
students.

Researchers recommend all students and authorities the importance of the Arduino. Implementation of this device will provide a low
cost and well-organized solution of monitoring the noise at schools.

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Funding

No sources of funding were used to conduct this work.

Reviewer Disclosures

No relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Declaration of Interest

No financial affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial competing with the subject matter
or materials discussed in the study.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Availability of Data

All data generated during this review are included in this study

Standards of Reporting

CONSORT guidelines were followed.

Authors Contributions
Authors interpreted and discussed the data, and wrote the first version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final
manuscript.

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control 8

Acknowledgments

This work was performed under collaboration between the Simaisma Secondary School for Boys and the MEHE. The authors thank
the anonymous reviewers for comments and correction that improved the manuscript and my special appreciation to Professor
Tarik Salih Sultan El Mtawaa Soltan Al-Kuwari and Professor Faissel Chemmery for their invaluable advice, coaching, support and
fruitful discussion throughout the project without which I would not have succeeded in carrying out this research.

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 5 | Issue 2

9 Journal of Environmental Pollution and Control

References

1. Fernandez-Prieto JA, Cañada-Bago J, Gadeo-Martos MA (2020) Wireless acoustic sensor nodes for noise monitoring in the city
of linares (Jaén). Sensors (Switzerland) 20:1-23

2. European WHORO for E and the JRC of the, Commission. (2011) Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise: Quantification
of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe. WHO Reg Off Eur 128?

3. Makan G, Mingesz R, Gingl Z (2019) How accurate is an Arduino Ohmmeter? Phys Educ 54:1-9

4. Atkin K (2017) Using the Arduino with MakerPlot software for the display of electrical device characteristics. Phys Educ 52:2-6

5. Kinchin J (2018) Using an Arduino and cheap thermistor to make a simple temperature sensor. Phys Educ 53:1-5

6. Atkin K (2018) Investigating the Torricelli law using a pressure sensor with the Arduino and MakerPlot. Phys Educ 53:1-9

7. Gingl Z, Mellár J, Szépe T, Makan G, Mingesz R, Vadai G, Kopasz K (2019) Universal Arduino-based experimenting system to
support teaching of natural sciences. J Phys Conf Ser 1287:1-9

8. Jamieson P (2011) Arduino for teaching embedded systems. are computer scientists and engineering educators missing the boat?
Proc FECS 289-294

9. Ahmed S, Ahmed TS Bin, Jafreen S, Tajrin J, Uddin J (2020) IoT Based Real Time Noise Mapping System for Urban Sound
Pollution Study. arXiv200211188v1 [csNI] 25 Feb 2020 25:1-4

10. HSE Technical (2014) Health, Safety & Environment Technical Guideline. UNIVERSITY, QATAR.

11. Fadeyi MO, Alkhaja K, Sulayem M Bin, Abu-Hijleh B (2014) Evaluation of indoor environmental quality conditions in
elementary schools’ classrooms in the United Arab Emirates. Front Archit Res 3:166-177

12. Klatte M, Hellbrück J, Seidel J, Leistner P (2010) Effects of Classroom Acoustics on Performance and Well-Being in Elementary
School Children: A Field Study. Environ Behav 42:659-692

13. Hathaway WE, Hathaway WE (2014) Effects on and Lighting Physical Development Performance. J Educ Res 88:228-242

Submit your next manuscript to Annex Publishers and

benefit from:
→ Easy online submission process
→ Rapid peer review process
→ Online article availability soon after acceptance for Publication
→ Open access: articles available free online
→ More accessibility of the articles to the readers/researchers within the field
→ Better discount on subsequent article submission
Submit your manuscript at
http://www.annexpublishers.com/paper-submission.php

Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 2 | Issue 1