10th Regular Session (October 3, 2022)
10th Regular Session (October 3, 2022)
Quezon City
22nd CITY COUNCIL
I. OPENING PRAYER
The Councilor’s Creed was recited by the members of the City Council, led by
Councilor Melendez.
The 10th Regular Session was called to order at 1:24 P.M. by the Presiding Officer,
Vice Mayor Gian G. Sotto.
V. ROLL CALL
The Secretary to the Sangguniang Panlungsod, Atty. Alferos, called the roll.
The following council members were present during the session (complete attendance):
Physically present in the Session Hall: Councilors Herrera, Calalay, Delarmente, Juico,
Crisologo, Ferrer, Belmonte (Mikey), Medina (Candy), Medalla (Julienne),
Valmocina, Ludovica, Liban (Godofredo), Lumbad, Antonio, De Leon, Lagumbay,
Reyes, Yap, Belmonte (Irene), Castelo Daza, Suntay, Visaya, Medalla (Ram), Liban
(Shay), Melendez, Castelo (Mutya), Matias, Medina (Eric), Pilar, Generoso, Bernardo,
Roxas, Dela Fuente, and the Presiding Officer, Vice Mayor Sotto; and live via Webex:
Councilors Galang-Coseteng, Rillo, Malañgen, Vargas, and Juan.
There being a quorum during the roll call, the Body proceeded with the order of the
day.
At this point, in celebration of the Elderly Week, the Presiding Officer acknowledged
the senior symbolic city officials per district of Quezon City (senior citizens’
counterparts of the Mayor, Vice Mayor, and City Councilors.).
NOTED.
Likewise, the Body acknowledged the presence of Councilor Atty. Jerome Lacbay from the
Embroidery Capital of the Philippines, Lumban, Laguna; used to be part of the Legislative
Staff of the Office of the Vice Mayor during the term of Mayor Joy Belmonte as Vice Mayor;
currently a Committee Chairperson of Laws, Rules and Privileges, Justice, Good
Governance, and Human Rights Violation; and newly-elected Board Member of the National
Movement of Young Legislators of Laguna Chapter.
Relative to the foregoing item, the Majority Floor Leader invited Dr. Christine Joy Aguila
to receive the scroll, a resolution of the City Council, SP-9015, S-2022, congratulating her
for being a Champion Educator, Filipino Language Instructor, and 2022 Metro Bank
Foundation Outstanding Filipino Awardee. After which, as requested by the Majority Floor
Leader, the awardee was accorded a round of applause.
With that, a recess was declared for the said presentation of the scroll and also for a photo
op, together with Councilor Atty. Jerome Lacbay.
When the session resumed, the Majority Floor Leader informed the Body that
Councilor Roxas expressed his intention to avail of the day’s Privilege Hour.
Upon recognition, the Privilege Speaker greeted Vice Mayor Gian Sotto, his colleagues, and
the distinguished guests with a good afternoon.
To start with, the Speaker remarked that September 25, 2022, is the schedule of their regular
session. However, due to Super Typhoon Karding, their session was postponed and they
were advised to remain indoors. He said that it is ironic because they, the punong barangays,
did not remain indoors because they were outside wearing their raincoats, and jackets, and
constantly monitoring the situation to make appropriate decisions for the safety of their
constituents and remain vigilant and alert for 24 to 48 hours when the typhoon had its
landfall. He added that he is also aware that the city councilors are also prepared to assist
their constituents who will be affected by the typhoon. He stressed that the work and school
classes were suspended, but they have to report to work and have to monitor the typhoon
overnight in their own style, preparing their evacuation plan, rescue boats, survival kits, food
packs, and others. He emphasized that Super Typhoon Karding is not his topic, but it just
happened that it was another force majeure that they have to face.
Further, he stated that he availed of the day’s Privilege Hour to congratulate the 142
barangays of Quezon City for the recently concluded 27th Barangay Day held last
September 22, 2022, with the theme, “Progresibong Barangay at Bayan na Maasahan” and
to formally recognize the 85 barangay awardees on different categories, which reflect their
satisfactory performance in serving their respective barangays.
He recalled that during the last Council, they passed the ordinance of Barangay Seal of Good
Housekeeping for which reason they wanted to give due recognition to the awardees for the
excellence in the performance of their duties and responsibilities to the barangay. Before
proceeding, a video presentation on the highlights of the Barangay Day Celebration was
played.
After which, he enumerated the names of the awardees and requested them to stand up as he
called their names, to wit:
DISTRICT I
Barangay Project 6
• Best in BHERT Functionality
5
Barangay Bungad
• Best in COVID-19 Response
Barangay Phil-Am
• Best in Barangay Ease of Doing Business
Barangay Damayan
• Best in Road Clearing
Barangay Talayan
• Innovator of Best Practice
• Best in Road Clearing
• Best in COVID-19 Response
Barangay Manresa
• Best in COVID-19 Response
Barangay Damar
• Best in Legislative Services
• Best in Good Financial Housekeeping
Barangay Salvacion
• Best in Legislative Services
Barangay Maharlika
• Best in Barangay Ease of Doing Business
Barangay Lourdes
• Best in Barangay Ease of Doing Business
• Best in Good Financial Housekeeping
DISTRICT II
Commonwealth
• Hall of Famer of the Dangal ng Lungsod
6
DISTRICT III
Barangay Silangan
• Best in Legislative Services
Barangay Pansol
• Best in Legislative Services
• Best in COVID-19 Response
• Best in BHERT Functionality
Barangay Mangga
• Best in Good Financial Housekeeping
Barangay Bayanihan
• Best in Good Financial Housekeeping
Barangay Libis
• Best in BHERT Functionality
Barangay Bagumbayan
• Best in COVID-19 Response
• Best in BHERT Functionality
Barangay Milagrosa
• Best in COVID-19 Response
• Best in BHERT Functionality
Barangay Escopa II
• Best in Good Financial Housekeeping
DISTRICT IV
Barangay Paligsahan
• Best in COVID-19 Response
7
Barangay Roxas
• Best in COVID-19 Response
Barangay Kamuning
• Innovator of Best Practice
Barangay Kaunluran
• Innovator of Best Practice
Barangay Horseshoe
• Innovator of Best Practice
• Best in Good Financial Housekeeping
Barangay Valencia
• Best in BHERT Functionality
Barangay Mariana
• Best in Barangay Ease of Doing Business
Barangay UP Campus
• Best in COVID-19 Response
Barangay Central
• Best in Road Clearing
• Best in BHERT Functionality
• 3rd Placer, Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentive Award
DISTRICT V
Barangay Capri
• Best in Barangay Ease of Doing Business
DISTRICT VI
Barangay Culiat
• Best in Legislative Services
• Best in Barangay Ease of Doing Business
• Best in BHERT Functionality
Barangay Talipapa
• Innovator of Best Practice
Furthermore, Councilor Roxas mentioned that in the Hall of Famer Award, Barangay
Commonwealth received PhP5 Million to use the same in its different programs, projects,
and services for the barangay. He remarked that it is a great practice in Quezon City, that
when they do good, they are motivated to give more because of very supportive Mayor Joy
Belmonte and Vice Mayor Gian Sotto, together with the City Council, who enact ordinances
to incentivize a good job well done. He said that they reward the performing barangays,
celebrate the competence of the punong barangays and the whole Barangay Council and staff
in the performance of their public functions, and inspire them to do better every year, while,
Quezon City remains the top performing city in the National Capital Region.
9
The Privilege Speaker expressed his feeling of being proud as Punong Barangay having
many colleagues receiving such prestigious awards. It only shows that they are not just doing
their work, but they are performing their duties more efficiently, 24 hours a day and 7 days
a week, and they could not just rest because they are taking care of their constituents to ensure
their safety. He said that it feels good to serve the barangay as much as they could. And it
feels even better that they could give honor to their barangays through their honest and
reliable public service, he stressed.
In closing, the Speaker thanked his co-chairperson, Councilor Ricky Corpuz, for a wonderful
Barangay Day Celebration. Long live, the Liga ng mga Barangay, all the barangays in
Quezon City, and the Team QC, he exclaimed.
Meanwhile, as requested by the Speaker, a recess was declared for a photo op with the
barangay awardees.
Councilor Delarmente manifested that on the 8th regular session of the City Council, the
Body agreed to invite the City Legal Officer, Atty. Orlando Paolo F. Casimiro, and
Atty. Maris Angelica Ayuyao for the Question and Answer Hour as a result of the personal
and collective privilege of Councilor Ludovica. In view thereof, the Majority Floor Leader
requested the presence of Atty. Casimiro.
With that, the Presiding Officer then invited the guest to join the City Council for the
Question and Answer Hour and thanked him for gracing the Council’s invitation.
To begin with, Councilor Ludovica thanked Atty. Casimiro and stated that this is just for
some clarifications regarding the functions of the City Legal Office. He knows that many of
the councilors received a letter inviting them to somewhat like committee hearing conducted
by Atty. Ayuyao about a series of measures that they filed in this Council. He asked the City
Legal Officer if he is aware of the said invitation.
Foremost, Atty. Casimiro greeted the members of the Council with a good afternoon. He
then explained that the issuance of invitation by Atty. Ayuyao came to his attention only on
September 21, 2022, when he and Councilor Ludovica met in the office.
Councilor Ludovica conveyed that, as a courtesy, he attended the said invitation. However,
he was surprised that it seems that they had a committee hearing outside the City Council’s
committee, that has the mandate and official function of crafting ordinances and resolutions.
He added that he was also surprised that Atty. Ayuyao seems to teach his representation what
to do while deliberating on their measure, which, supposed to be, should pass through the
Council’s committees to where it was referred to and the Lady Attorney stated therein her
own opinion and certain laws that for him is the duty of the councilors. On the other hand,
he expressed his gladness that this matter came to the attention of the City Legal Officer and
claimed that he is not aware of it. With that, he asked Atty. Casimiro on his action when
this concern came to his knowledge.
Upon learning of this matter, Atty. Casimiro claimed that he already told Atty. Ayuyao to
stop issuing invitations. In fact, he already gets the entire case folder of 21 ordinances so he
would be the one, personally, to handle it. He further narrated that the reason it happened is
that in practice, ordinances are being referred to their office. He explained that, traditionally,
it is the Mayor or the City Administrator who has transmittal for the ordinances; and in this
case, the City Secretary, Atty. Alferos, wrote them seeking their comments,
recommendations, and review of said ordinance.
10
Further, Atty. Casimiro conveyed that the members of the Council know him as a very
approachable person by nature; if it is him, he would have approached it another way. He
stressed that, maybe, his staff just wanted to help and sends standard invitations addressed
to the councilors stating therein that the councilor or duly authorized representative could
attend, but never is, was, or will be his intention as the City Attorney or the City Legal
Department to encroach on the wisdom of the city councilors and the proponent of any
ordinance for that matter to interfere in the crafting of an ordinance. He clarified that,
perhaps, Atty. Ayuyao just read the provision of the Local Government Code and interpreted
the transmittal from the City Secretary as a request from the City Council, in general, to help
in crafting measures, but it is beyond her power to say or impose what she wanted. He further
clarified that their function primarily is to see to it that the form and substance comply with
the law and if she has suggestions, her personal opinion is outside of it because it is all within
the prerogative of the City Council as the Legislative Body of the Quezon City Government.
With that, Councilor Ludovica reiterated his gladness that the enlightenment on this matter
personally came from the City Attorney. He recalled that when he asked them where they
get the authority and conduct such seemingly committee hearings outside the Council, they
claimed that it is based on the request of the City Secretariat. As such, being a long-time
councilor, he advised them that it is only the City Council who has the right to conduct
hearings for the proposed measures and only the Court could say that the legislations they
enacted are unconstitutional. He said that what is important is that it passed through the
process based on the City Council’s Internal Rules and Procedures. He expressed his
gladness that Atty. Casimiro, a former Punong Barangay, acted on this matter. He added
that, at least now, they are all enlightened on this matter.
The Majority Floor Leader likewise thanked Atty. Casimiro for the very swift response, as
he immediately texted her representation when Councilor Ludovica manifested his
experience two weeks ago. She asked if Atty. Ayuyao is new to the City Legal Department
and her delegation in the office.
The City Attorney responded that Atty. Ayuyao is an organic lawyer of the City Planning
and Development Department and an Attorney IV of the Quezon City Government. He
explained that when he assumed office, the City Legal Department has only around
seven (7) lawyers then. Since the City Planning doesn’t need a lawyer that much,
Atty. Ayuyao was detailed to the City Legal Department to augment the workforce of the
department.
As to the query of the Majority Floor Leader if her job description includes the reviewing of
the ordinances and resolutions passed by the City Council, Atty. Casimiro explained that
whenever a transmittal, complaint, or whatever paperwork is transmitted to their Office that
merits or requires the attention of a lawyer, it is being raffled among their lawyers, and such
bulk of ordinances go to Atty. Ayuyao; after which, she issues invitations.
The Majority Floor Leader observed that from Atty. Ayuyao’s letter, it seems that they have
a special division that is in charge of reviewing the measures, especially the ordinances
passed by the Quezon City Council, to which Atty. Casimiro responded that he, personally,
wanted to read all ordinances for he know that these are important issuance by the City
Council. It so happens that it is raffled off to one person and are numerous ordinances. He
further claimed that he reminded his lawyers that the responsibility of the City Legal
Department is to put recommendations or comments only, but never to draft an actual
ordinance, per se.
11
If there is a division under the City Legal Department that is assigned to review ordinances
that require their legal opinion, the Majority Floor Leader suggested detailing a lawyer
during their committee hearings, as well as, in the session because most of the discussions
and also the attendance of resource speakers regarding ordinances happened during the
Committee on Laws’ hearing. She remarked that PAISD has detailed a resource person to
attend their committee hearings and sessions. She said that, maybe, in a way, it would help
if the Legal Department also assign a lawyer to serve as a resource person other than
supervising their committee hearings. When they had debates and need legal opinions, it
would be easier knowing that they have a resource person from the Legal Department who
is assigned and watching them from the gallery, she added.
In reaction thereto, the City Attorney articulated that considering the diversity of topics that
the ordinances may cover, there is no single lawyer that could be assigned because, even
though they had lots of lawyers, each of them has individual specialties. If the City Legal
Department could be informed of the topic of the ordinance, he could definitely send a
lawyer who is well-versed on the matter.
On the other hand, Councilor Liban (Godofredo) inquired about the duties and
responsibilities of the City Legal Department so the members of the City Council would
know if there is a need to call a lawyer from the department to aid in the passing of any
ordinance or resolution.
With that, Atty. Casimiro read the most pertinent provision regarding the matter or legal
basis that is relevant to the discussion, specifically Article XI, Section 481, sub-section B.3,
sub-section 2 of the Local Government Code, defining the scope of the powers and
obligations of the City Legal Officer, which states, to wit:
As such, Councilor Liban (Godofredo) opined that the time they could probably suggest or
recommend is when the City Mayor asked them, to which the City Attorney added, or the
Sanggunian, as per the Local Government Code. He also opined that the Legal Department
usually comes into play after the City Council has already approved the measure and
ordinances and this is forwarded to the City Mayor, to which the City Attorney responded
in the affirmative.
Further, Atty. Casimiro agreed with the good Councilor that until the measure is being
discussed in the Council unless they are invited, it should be left to the Council to decide
whether to pass or will not pass an ordinance. It is not for their lawyer or their office to invite
Councilors to attend a meeting set by Atty. Ayuyao, but it should be the Council to call for
the Legal Department if a legal opinion is necessary.
In addition, the City Legal Officer imparted that, at the end of the day, it is a command
responsibility and he takes full responsibility for the actions of his lawyer. It is a good
intention from his lawyer, but he apologized to the City Council for this circumstance. He
claimed that every time the Council needs the legal opinion of his department, he goes to
them personally. Further, he expressed his willingness to help even if measures are not yet
passed that need their legal opinions or recommendations.
12
Having been recognized, Councilor Juico inquired about the current manpower composition
of the City Legal Department because he knows that for quite some time, they had limited
lawyers, and if they already hired new lawyers, to which Atty. Casimiro responded that they
have hired additional lawyers over the course of three years and they have around
fifteen (15) lawyers, including him and Atty. Austria. Concerning the current plantilla, the
City Attorney stated that it is around thirty (30) lawyers, which are all in line with those
awaiting the Personnel Selection Board (PSB) because all the plantilla positions have been
opened. As to the scheduled date of the PSB, Atty. Casimiro remarked that it was supposed
to be last Friday and it was actually postponed twice, thus they are still awaiting it. He also
informed the Council that they have in line two Sharia Court lawyers for the Muslim
community. He stressed that they have efforts to augment and fill up all plantilla positions,
so they could better help the city.
Councilor Juico stated that the reason he asked for their manpower is that it is to the earlier
suggestion of the Majority Floor Leader. He opined that it is a case-to-case basis depending
on what legislation the councilors wanted to pass and a request coming from the City Council
to seek assistance in terms of advice coming from the City Legal Office. Once their
manpower shortage is settled, it would address such a request.
The City Legal Officer answered in the affirmative. He again explicated that the said
ordinances were acted upon the transmittal of the City Secretary, which could mean
anything; they interpreted it in a way that their help is needed, but it just so happened that
the execution was not the one expected. Anyway, he said that he takes full responsibility and
apologized for the action of his subordinate.
As for the Presiding Officer, there was just probably a miscommunication or something. He
informed Atty. Casimiro that the Council really appreciated his presence and humility in
explaining the matter. They have been working together since 2019 and the good
City Attorney is a blessing also in the city’s fight against COVID-19. His guidance is very
important to the Council and also to the Office of the Mayor, His Honor added.
Subsequently, since Atty. Casimiro mentioned earlier that there was a transmittal from the
City Secretary, the Majority Floor Leader requested to invite also Atty. Alferos, so he could
also explain his side on the matter.
Having been recognized, Atty. Alferos articulated that the transmittal made by the Office of
the Sanggunian Secretary is intended to give an advance copy to the City Legal Department
because when the measure is approved by the City Council, the City Mayor has only ten (10)
days to approve the same. In addition, he explained that the Office was requested by the
Executive Department to give a copy in advance, even if it is still a proposed measure so that
it could be studied already. In that case, when the measure is approved, basically, it will not
be that long to review it considering the time that was given by law, which is only ten (10)
days for the Mayor to sign, and due to the transmittal, sometimes, such ten (10) days lapse.
He emphasized that the intention of the transmittal is for the City Legal Department to have
a copy so that if the committee or the Sanggunian would call them, they have already, more
or less, a copy and have already read the proposed measure.
Concerning the query of Councilor Juico if this goes not just for the Office of the Mayor,
but all the departments affected and concerned, Atty. Alferos responded, yes, even the
concerned offices or individuals are being given an advance copy for their comment; this is
part of the belief of the Administration for participatory governance, he added.
With that, Councilor Juico opined that, in effect, the reason they are doing this is because
when the Committee on Laws or other committees will tackle certain legislation, the
concerned parties are ready – they have an advance copy and they could give additional
information and comments on the ordinance, to which the City Secretary answered in the
affirmative.
13
Having been enlightened on the transmittal, the Majority Floor Leader remarked that they
just started last August and only passed around two or a maximum of three ordinances for
the Committee on Laws. She opined that, maybe, it would be easier if Atty. Ayuyao would
like to be more versed with the ordinance, she could just approach the Councilor/Proponent
or his/her Legis instead of telling the Councilors to go to her.
Concurring with the Majority Floor Leader, Atty. Casimiro reiterated that to him, he would
have approached it differently in giving his comments. Anyway, he already directed his staff
to stop doing it. If they were to render any comment, review, or recommendation, they will
just wait for confirmation from the Councilor/Proponent if their input is necessary to avoid
similar instances.
Atty. Alferos affirmed with Councilor De Leon’s statement that they were asked by the
Office of the Mayor to transmit even proposed ordinances; it was a practice even before the
time of Mayor Joy Belmonte for them to be informed in advance; it is for exigency purposes;
and they were also requested by the Executive to be furnished a copy to the departments
concerned so they could give their comments on the proposed measure.
Atty. Alferos stated that when the ordinance is already approved, they transmit it to the
Mayor and Her Honor transmits the same to the concerned offices. However, as he
mentioned, if this will be done, the ten days period is usually short. He further agreed with
Councilor De Leon that up to now, it is still a practice that proposed measures are submitted
to the City Legal as an advance copy as well as to the concerned offices for comments. The
intention is, just in case the committee will be hearing the same, they have already their copy
so they could give their comments right away when the Council needs it, he added.
Sharing her thoughts on this matter, Councilor Belmonte (Irene) opined that, maybe, there
is just a little problem with the use of the word, “unconstitutional,” during the consultation
with the Councilor. The Constitution, she stressed, is supreme, and paramount in any
legislative or executive act contrary to its term could not survive. Maybe, the councilors
invited feel offended when they say that their proposed measure is unconstitutional because
only the Courts could say that a law is unconstitutional, she further opined. In fact, in a
proposed measure or law, there is only a part of it that could be taken away because it cannot
be executed. She added that as a solution to that, if they have a request for legal advice, the
City Secretary shall write the City Legal Department, but the latter should send their reply
to whoever has written them so as not to pre-empt the committee hearings of the councilors.
She said that she is also open to the suggestion of the Majority Floor Leader if there is
personnel from the City Legal, which will shed light during the committee hearings. She
stressed that although they have their own Legislative staff, the legal opinion that would
come from the City Legal is still different. Again, she suggested limiting the use of the word
“unconstitutional,” when referring to ordinances proposed by the City Council. Maybe, they
could comment that a portion of it is against the constitution, but not to say that the whole
measure is unconstitutional. She stated that it is their right as a City Councilor to legislate
and it is also the mandate of the City Legal to check on it. Further, she stated that there are
branches of the government that could assist them all for the citizen of Quezon City. Thus,
she reiterated her advice for the City Legal to just send their reply to whoever writes on them,
which is the City Secretary in this case; if the councilor consults them, then that’s the time
they could give their legal opinion to the councilor.
14
Atty. Casimiro acceded to the manifestations of the Lady Councilor. He said that as per their
discussion in the office, such practice will be stopped – no invitations will come out, and the
use of legal words directed to the proponent will definitely be stopped to avoid any conflict.
Upon request of the City Council, he added that they could immediately send lawyers to the
Council. It has been a learning experience for them. Again, he sought an apology on behalf
of his lawyer.
There being no other clarifications, the Majority Floor Leader thanked the City Legal
Officer, Atty. Casimiro, for joining the Council; after which, the Question and Answer Hour
was terminated.
X. CALENDAR OF BUSINESS
b. FOR CONFIRMATION
B. BARANGAY BUDGET
FOR CONFIRMATION
The annual and supplemental budgets of the foregoing barangays were CONFIRMED.
1. FIRST READING:
a. PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS
REFERRED to the Committees on City Planning, Building & Zoning and on Laws,
Rules & Internal Government.
Items 2 to 5 were REFERRED to the Committees on Energy, Water & Other Natural
Resources, City Planning, Building & Zoning, and on Laws, Rules & Internal
Government.
REFERRED to the Committees on Food Security & Urban Agriculture and on Laws,
Rules & Internal Government.
2. SECOND READING:
At this point, Councilor Pilar moved for the omnibus approval of PR22CC-019,
PR22CC-020, PR22CC-021, PR22CC-022, and PR22CC-023, since they are of the same
nature, viz:
The Proponent, thereupon, articulated that these proposed measures give authority to the
City Mayor to acquire parcels of land for the socialized housing projects of the city
government. He further informed the Council that the said five (5) lots are occupied by
informal settlers. This, he added, is intended as compliance with the priority agenda of the
City Mayor and the city government, including the City Council, to provide decent and
affordable housing to the less privileged constituents of the city.
Concerning the query of the Presiding Officer as to the number of families or beneficiaries
in the subject properties, Councilor Pilar answered:
The Presiding Officer expressed the full support of the Body for these measures and one
with the City Mayor in her programs and advocacies in giving lots and housing projects for
all their fellow QCitizens.
Likewise, the Proponent affirmed His Honor’s statement that these proposals were consulted
with the City’s Housing Department.
Similarly, Councilor Medina (Eric) placed on record his support for these resolutions. As a
District VI colleague, he knows that it is a big help, once approved by the Council, because
Barangays Culiat and Pasong Tamo really need this project as they have been longing to
have decent housing. He expressed his hope that it would materialize by passing through
legal processes, so they could help their constituents in District VI.
Councilor Bernardo also manifested his strong support for these resolutions, the same as he
supports the advocacies of the City Mayor in providing decent housing that they could own.
He concurred that it has been a long dream of the families therein to own the said lots
someday.
- This resolution aims to have its own building and facilities for the District
Action Office; it could materialize and be permanent if it is constructed on
a city-owned property; and
The Presiding Officer expressed the Council’s full support to the foregoing measure as it
would be a big help to many people.
- The said sale is allowed under approved Resolution No. 8630, S-71 and
other pertinent laws and regulations, thus it is legal and advantageous on
the part of the city government; and
His Honor, the Presiding Officer, expressed the full support of the Council; another measure
that is really needed.
After citing the following merits of this resolution, on motion of Councilor Genoroso,
duly seconded, PR22CC-148 was APPROVED on its second reading, with the
following manifestations from the Proponent and the adoption of the proposed
amendments, to wit:
- San Juan River, which runs from Quezon City to the Cities of San Juan,
Mandaluyong, and Manila is considered one of the most polluted water
wastes in the metropolis;
- To continue the commitment of Quezon City, the City Mayor created the
San Juan River Rehabilitation Committee through Executive Order
No. 42, S-2020, which is also a sub-committee of the Quezon City Task
Force in Manila Bay;
- Under the strategy of the Quezon City Enhanced Local Climate Change
Action Plan is the institutionalization of monitoring in terms of compliance
to wastewater effluent and water quality in rivers and waterways;
Relative to the foregoing measure, the Presiding Officer conveyed that it is another very
important measure and he thanked the University of the Philippines for helping the city
government and improving the water quality in Quezon City through their quality Consulting
Services for Water Quality Testing.
- That they will provide the city with 25 units of biodigesters, which will
convert food waste to liquid fertilizer; and the community to form mobile
trucks to be used to transport food waste, and they would also provide the
city with training and workshops;
As for the Presiding Officer, this is again a very important measure that they really need to
pass.
- There is a need for the Quezon City Government to sign the Performance
Commitment as a statutory documentary requirement for the continuous
PHILHEALTH Accreditation of its Primary Care Facilities;
- That the Performance Commitment for HCIs shall cover the remaining
portion of accreditation or renew the participation of the NHIP as the case
may be, as a sign of good faith and continuous commitment to support the
NHIP;
- As per the Local Government Code, the City Mayor shall represent the
city in all its business transactions and sign on its behalf all bonds,
contracts and obligations, and such other documents upon authority of the
Sangguniang Panlungsod; and
30
Having moved for its approval, the Majority Floor Leader articulated that one of the
requirements for the submission of entries is the Council Resolution approving the
application to the Philippine Heritage Awards. She further informed the Body that the
Quezon City Government will be submitting an entry dubbed as “Quezon City: Iba Ang May
Alam,” a compilation of book publications and a video documentary of Quezon City.
Manifesting the Council’s support for this resolution, the Presiding Officer stated that it is a
big help, especially to their advocacy of taking care the Filipino values and culture.
The Lady Proponent concurred with the Presiding Officer and added that it is also their way
of showing their best practices not only in the Philippines but in the whole world, as well.
Hence, she expressed her hope that the city wins this event.
With no other comments, on motion, duly seconded, PR22CC-156 was APPROVED on its
second reading, with the inclusion of all the councilors present as co-introducers of this
measure.
During the period of discussion, Councilor Herrera manifested that this ordinance is similar
to his previously approved measure as it authorizes the City Mayor to sign the Performance
Agreement for healthcare institutions and the only difference is that, through this ordinance,
they are giving the City Mayor to sign all Performance Commitment with PHILHEALTH
until June 2025, considering that the PHILHEALTH program is a vital component of the
healthcare facilities such as healthcare centers, lying-in clinics, social hygiene clinics, animal
treatment center, and the three city-owned hospitals (QCGH, NDH, and RMBGH). Also, he
added that due to the pandemic and with the sense of urgency to sign the Performance
Commitment with PHILHEALTH, the City Mayor signed the same, and through this
measure, they are ratifying the same since 2019 as a curative action to the authority given
by the City Council.
Moreso, the Proponent relayed that during the Committee on Laws’ hearing, the City Health
Department’s representative manifested the statement of the City Administrator and they
support the measure. He said that they were also able to talk to the City Administrator and
expressed their support for this proposal and requested a few amendments to the title and
Section 1, using the word “provided for” instead of “institutionalizing.” The said amendment
is included in the amended version as submitted to the City Secretary.
Moreover, Councilor Herrera informed the Body that in his possession is a Certificate of
Urgency given by the City Mayor and City Administrator. He stressed that as per the Local
Government Code, the City Mayor shall represent the city to sign contracts and such other
documents upon authority of the Sangguniang Panlungsod.
Having been recognized, the President Pro-Tempore observed that this resolution has two
subject matters - the title thereof pertains to the institutionalization of various
PHILHEALTH packages to centers, clinics, and hospitals of the city government. However,
Section 3 provides for the ratification of the various agreement entered into sometime in
July 2019, which is three years ago. He clarified that he is not objecting to this measure, but
rather supporting it. He just opined to put this to avoid any problem in the future. As such,
he inquired: first, what is the relation of various agreements entered into three years ago to
this proposed ordinance, and what are the contents thereof. To him, it is important to know
the provisions of the agreement because they are ratifying the same; second, if the subject of
the said agreement is the proposed ordinance that they are currently discussing, why the
agreements were entered into ahead of this proposed ordinance. The right procedure, he said,
is to first give the Mayor the authority to enter into an agreement involving these various
PHILHEALTH packages and the agreement has to be signed, and if there are no amendments
thereto, then the City Council has to ratify the same.
Replying thereto, Councilor Herrera explicated that they wanted to ratify the agreements
since 2019 because, during the pandemic, the City Mayor signed the performance
evaluations of the healthcare institutions. They made it an ordinance so that if the City Mayor
needs to sign performance indications and they could renew every year their partnership with
the PHILHEALTH. Citing as an example is that, if the Mayor needs to sign performance
indicators for the three city-owned hospitals, they are already giving Her Honor the authority
to sign it until her end of term.
Further, the Proponent reiterated that, in the title, he would amend the word
“institutionalizing” to “providing for.”
Meanwhile, the Presiding Officer placed on record that they have a Certificate of Urgency
coming from the Office of the Mayor endorsing this particular measure.
32
E. OTHER MATTERS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other items to be discussed, on motion, duly seconded, the day’s session was
adjourned.
Prepared by:
MARISA S. DE JEMIL
Senior Administrative Asst. I
ANITA A. CABALQUINTO
Senior Administrative Asst. I
GLENDA G. FELIX
Legislative Staff Officer III
ATTESTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
GIAN G. SOTTO
City Vice Mayor & Presiding Officer