0% found this document useful (0 votes)
276 views56 pages

Chapter 12

Analysis and Design of Two-Way Slabs
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
276 views56 pages

Chapter 12

Analysis and Design of Two-Way Slabs
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 56
goo CHAPS’ CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY Stagg 0 NOTATIONS & SY MBOL specified compressive stress of 2 concrete, MPa A specified yield strength of steel, MPa b width of compression face of member, mm d distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of tension reinforcement, mm h total slab thickness, mm s spacing of bar, mm dy diameter of bar, mm dogg diameter of aggregates, mm Ay area of bar, mm? Ay = required area of steel, mm? Asmin = minimum area of steel, mm? Ag = ‘gross concrete area, mm? p = steel reinforcement ratio Pmin minimum steel reinforcement ratio “% = factored uniform load, KN /m Wp = uniform service dead load, KN/m w, = uniform service live load, kN/m 12.1 INTRODUCTION Le oe ae of the longer span to the shorter span is less than 2, the load sharing is done in both directions bite feat ia ihe sab is supported on all four sides. These slabs are known as two-way slabs. TWo-W3 pits Pe ao diretions and they must be reinforced by layers of bars that are perpendicular to each Dies Deen Wcliadnsee: A 3 specifies two methods of designing two-way slabs. ‘These are the Code allove the designer Fe .10 and Equivalent Frame Method of Section 408.11. However. the compatibility as long as design sicnaih a procedures that satisfies equilibrium and gon” the Strip Method and the Moment Cocficen Matted eee rene “ The methods used Ma od in this chapter are the Direct Design Method & Moment Coefficient Method: FORCED MJBCASTRO. RE MPLIFIED RED i0N) 2: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS yarTeR ' IGN OF TWO-' SY 7 ysis ANP N WAY SLABS ys : 3, = er cous AND MIDDLE STRIPS (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.4.1.5.6) 1 moments have been determined by either the direct design method or the equivalent frame design ; 7 ae ey are distributed res a The Panels are divided into column and middle strips and jet negative moments Las stimated in each strip. The column strip is a slab with a width on each psi ie Matumn centerline equal to 0.25L2 or 0.25L whichever is smaller. It includes beams if the fot re mide strip is the par of the slab between the two column strips. : * sent 5 | 408.4.1.5 8 column strip is a design strip with a width on each side of a column centerline equal to the lesser of .25Lz and 0.25L,. A column strip shall include beams within the strip, if present. ° | 408.4.1.6 A middle strip is a design strip bounded by two column strips Lz \ Middle t \\ Strip 1 0.251; or 0.25Lz 0.251; or 0.25L2 whichever is smaller whichever is smaller Figure 13.1 Column and Middle Strips 123 2.2 MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.3.1) 408.3.1.2 For non-prestressed slabs with beams spanning between supports on all sides, Gkeall slab thickness ft shall satisfy the limits in Table 408.3.1.2, unless the calculated leflection limits of Section 408.3.2 are satisfied. ee wt SIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS Table 408.3.1.2 Prestressed Two-Way Slabs with Beam mum Thickness of Non-1 Supports on All Sides Spanning between pn! Minimum h, mm ] = 1 aym $02 0.22 < ym 20 | Greaterof | 36 + 5B(ajm ~ 0-2) 125 } « | | (are) Gp > 20 Greater of G) TH aay isthe average value of ay for all beams on edges of a panel and @y shall be calculated in accordance with Section 408.10.2.7 (2) ,, is the clear span in the long direction, measured face-to-face of beams (mm) 151 B is the ratio of clear spans in long to short directions of slab. 12.2.3 MINIMUM FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT IN NON-PRESTRESSED TWO-WAY SLABS (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.6.1) f flexural reinforcement, As nin shall be provided near the accordance with Table = 408.6.1.1 A minimum area 0! tension face in the direction of the span under consideration in 408.6.1.1 Table 408.6.1.1 Aguin for Non-Prestressed Two-Way Slabs Reinforcement | ¢ yg Type fy MPa Deformed bars < 420 0.00204, Deformed bars or a 0.0018(420) welded wire > 420 br se o reinforcement ional 12.2.4 FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT SPACING (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.72) uum spacing $ of deformed longitudind nd the lesser of 3 = 408.7.2.2 For non-prestressed solid slabs, maxim reinforcement shall be the lesser of 2h and 450mm at critical sections, and 450mm at other sections MJBCASTRO IMPLI CONCRETE DESIGN 2 cuarTeR 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 263 pirecT DESIGN METHOD (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.10) 03 ch 2015 Section 408.10 provides a procedure with which a set of moment ci x ined ‘The method, in effect, involves a single-cycle moment distribution analysis of the structure we 4) Theestimated flexural stilfnesses of the slabs, beams (i any), and columns and: ‘The torsional stiffnesses of the slabs and beams (if any) transverse to the direction in which flexural moments are being determined. + 408.10.1.1 Two-way slabs satisfying the limits in Section 408.10.2 shall be permitted to be designed in accordance with this section 1231 LIMITATIONS FOR USE OF DIRECT DESIGN METHOD (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.102) + 408.10.2.1 There shall be at least three continuous spans in each direction + 408.10.2.2 Successive span lengths measured center-to-center of supports in each direction shall not differ by more than one-third the longer span. + 408,10.2.3 Panels shall be rectangular, with the ratio of longer to shorter panel dimensions, measured center-to-center of supports, not to exceed 2. + 408.10.2.4 Column offsets shall not exceed 10 percent of the span in direction of offset from either axis between centerlines of successive columns. + 408.10.2.5 All loads shall be due to gravity only and uniformly distributed over an entire . panel. + 408.10.2.6 Unfactored live load shall not exceed two times the unfactored dead load. + 408.10.2.7 For a panel with beams between supports on all sides, Eq, 408.10.2.7a shall be satisfied for beams in the two perpendicular directions. api? o2<5<50 @paly ary, and aya are calculated by a, = ele To Eels where: 1, = length of span in direction that moments are being determined, measured center- to-center of supports L, = length of span transverse to L,, measured center-to-center of supports Ecy = modulus of elasticity of concrete beam Ec; = modulus of elasticity of concrete slab 1, = moment of inertia about centroidal axis of gross section of beams as defined in Section 408.4.1.8 ; 1, = moment of inertia about centroidal axis of gross section of slab SPLRtED ONCRETE. REINFORCED MJBCASTRO DESIGN (2 EDITION) 264 D DESIGN OF TWO-WAY Stagg CHAPTER 22: ANALYSIS A > alates for monolithic oF fully-composite ex » 3015 Section 4084 1.8 states that for moni nstruction su w fi a beam includes that a portion of slab, on each side of the beam extending 4 4, the projection of the beam above or below the slab, whichever 1s greater, but not greater th slab thickness. Effective Flange Projection of Beam Efective Flange Projection of Beam 12.3.2 TOTAL FACTORED STATIC MOMENT FOR A SPAN (NSCP 2015 sECtioy 408.10.3) + 408.10.3.1 Total factored static moment, Ma, for a span shall be caleulated for a sin bounded laterally by the panel centerline on each side of the centerline of supports, + 408.10.3.2 The absolute sum of positive and average negative My in each direction shall be at least: Qubaln 8 M,= = 408.10.3.2.1 In Eq. 408.10.3.2, Ly is the clear span length in the direction that moments are considered, shall extend from face to face of columns, capitals, brackets, or walls, and shall be at least 0.652 * — 408.10.3.2.2 In Eq, 408. 10.3.2, if the transverse span of panels on either side of the centerline of supports varies, Lz shall be taken as the average of adjacent transverse spans, * — 408.10.3.2.3 In Eq. 408.10.3.2, if the span adjacent and parallel to a slab edge is being considered, the distance from edge to panel centerline shall be substituted for Ly 12.3.3 DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL FACTORED STATIC MOMENT (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.10.4) Y ative * 408.10.4.1 In an interior span, My shall be distributed as follows: 0.65Mg 10 moment and 0.35M, to positive moment. * 408.10.4.2 \n an end span, My shall be distributed in accordance with Table 408.1042 FORCED EIN MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED REIN) CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDIE p eR 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS Ml Tis P . Table 408.10.4.2 Distribution Coefficients for End Spans | gat.d3 Moitication of negative and postive factored moments by upto 10 percent shall ‘ited if the total factored static moment for a panel, Mg, in the Girection considered be permit pe preast that calculated by Eq. 408.10.3.2, Moment redistribution in accordance with Section 406.6.6.5 is not permitted 1 qgbltetd Critical section for negative My shal be atthe face ofthe rectangular supports ga.10.4.5 Negative My, shall be the greater of the two interior negative Mu calculated for ‘pans faming into a common suppor unless an analysis is made to distribute the unbalanced ment in accordance with stiffnesses of adjoining elements. 408.10.4.6 Edge beams or edges of slabs shall be designed to resist in torsion their share of exterior negative My 123.4 FACTORED MOMENTS IN COLUMN STRIPS (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.10.5) + 408.105.1 The column strip shall resist the portion of interior negative M, in accordance with Table 408.10.5.1 Table 408.10.5.1 M, in Portion of Interior Negative Column Strip 0.5 0.75 >10. | 090 | Note: Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown. * 408.10.5.2 The column strip shall resist the portion of exterior negative M,, in accordance with Table 408.10.5.2. > ts mmm OMNES PLP “FLED REINFORC! NORE TD REINFORCED ,CASTRO ETE DESIGN (2 EDITION) MJBCASTR' 266 CHAPTER a 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SL Ags Table 408.10.5.2 Portion of Exterior Negative M, in Column Strip 0.5 1.0 i oO 1.0 1.0 10 1 225 07 | 075 075 re tO Cone |e 0 | 210 225 “0.90 07s | 045 | Note: Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown. jy calculated using Eq. 408.10.5.2a where C is calculated using Eq. 408.10.5,2b, where: MJBCASTRO _ Fal 1 2Besls c= (1-06 an = ratio ofthe torsional stifness ofan edge beam section tothe flexural sits of 8 width of slab equal to the span length of the beam measured center to cen ot supports. length ofthe short side of each rectangle length of the long side of each rectangle r Lhe eam — | th | J 1 5 | 3 1 Beam section as per Section 408,4.1.8 408.10.5.3 For T or L-sections, it shall be permitted to calculate the constant € in E4 (408.10.5.2b) by dividing the section, as given in 408,4.1.8, into separate rectangular pats and summing the values of € for each part 4108,10.5.4 IF the width of the column or wall is at least (3/4)L2, negative Mu Sul! uniformly distributed across La. swith Table £08.10.5.5 The column strip shall resist the portion of positive My, in accord 408,10.5.5, SIMPLIFIED RI ON) CONCRETE DESIGN 2° ED!" gil tt 12; ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS ch Table 408.10.5.5 Column Strip ae 0.60 0.60 S1 0.90 075 045 Note: Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown, gga. For slabs with beams Between suport, the ib pot . 2 cum stip moments not resisted by Beams Porton of eolomn strips shall , nas FACTORED MOMENTS IN BEAMS (NSCP 2015 SECTION 408.10.5.7) 409.10.5.7.1 Beams between supports shall resist the tion of i jcoordance with Table 408.10.5.7.1. Ce a Table 408.10.5.7.1 10 0.85 AA aR : RED MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED RE TON) CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? ED! y ™ 2: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS mM ty ies the moment coefTicients for Negative Moments at Continuous Edges. The coefficient 11 n= ba/ Un ad the edge coniions of the panel, The maximum negative moment a ye Fal ne erage both pares adjaent tan edge suppr toa uniform factored load (DL-*LL) ens discontinuous edges are assumed to be 1/3 of the positive moment in the same om. Ta Table = ei Cima’ el Ed @\a|\|B | 2 = 0.045 0.076 0.050 0.075 0.071 | 0.071 0.033 0.061 - 0.045 0.076 0.050 0.075 0.071 0.071 0.061 0.033 —/o50 | 0072 | 0.035 | 0079 | 007s | 0.067 | 0.038 | 0.065 os Ff ona [0072 | oes [oor | ors {oer | 0.056 | 002s Cc = 0.055, 0.070 0.060 0.080. 0.079 0.062 0,043 0.068 ww 22 oosr [000 [aoa | oogo [oor [0.06 | ons | 6028 Cr - 0.060 0.065 0.066 0.082 0.083 0.057 0.049 0.072 os Ep 00st | 06s | 034 [0.082 | 0083 [0.057 | 0.046 1 002) Cr - 0.065 0.061 0.071 0.083 0.086 0.051 0.055 0.075 oo LG parr [0061 | 0.029 | 0.083 | 0086 | 00st | 0.041 | 0.017 SF 049 |_0055_| 0.076 | oss | 008s | "0.084 | 0.061 | 0078 ose — yon [0.056 | 0.024 | 0.085 | 0.088 | 004 | 0.036 _| 0.014 & _——F-p 974 [0.050 | 0.081 | ooss_| 0.091 | 0038 | 0.068 008 oo Ce +017 [0050] 0.019 | 0.086 | 0091 | 0.038 | 0.029 | 0.011 oe ES hor [0.043 | 0.085 | 0.087 | 009s | 0031 | 0074 | 0.083 1 : 0.014 0.043 0.015 0.087 0.093 0.031 0.024 0.008 | 0160 = 0.081 0.035 0.089 0.088 0.095 0.024 0.080 0.085 = 0.010 0.035 0.011 0,088 0.095 0.024 0.018 0,006 055 = 0,084 0.028 0.092 0.089 0.096 0.019 0.085 0.086 0.007 0,028 0.008 0.089 0.096 0.019 0.014 0.005, 050 Foss t0.022 {0.094 | 0.090 | 0097 | oid | 0.08 | 0088 Gt 0.006. 0.022 0.006 0,090 0.097 0.014 0.010. 0.003 ‘Wie Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown, ce RS SS, Sp AFI 7 Conca? REINFORCED MJBCASTRO DESIGN (2% EDITION) i) OF TWO-way SLABS ee CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIG vides the moment coefficients for Positive Moment due to De apes paper Lq/Lp and the edge conditions of the panel tad Load. the Coefficiens 4 Iso, S| es Bz 0.036 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.033 | 0027 0.020 0.036 0.018 0.027 0.027 0.018 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.040 | 0.020 | 0.021 0.030 _| 0.028 | 0.036 | 0.931 0.022 | 0033 | 0.016 | 0.025 | 0.024 {0.015 [0.024 |~0031 | pos | 04s | 0.022, | 0.025 | 0.033 [0.029 [0.039 0.035} nose 0.029 | 0.014 | 0.024 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.021 | 0028 0.019 _| 0.050 [0.024 | 0.029_| 0.036 | 0.031 0.042 | 0.040 | 0.029 | oor | 0.012 | 0.022 | 0.019 | 0011 | 0017 | 0.025~}-oor | 0.056 | 0.026 | 0.034 |"'0.039 {0.032 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.037 0.023 | 0011 | 0.020 | 0.016 | 0.009 |~0.015 | 0.022 0.015 0.061 | 0.028 | 0.040 |’ 0.043 | 0.033 _[ 0.048 | 0.051 0.036 0019 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.012 | 0.020 0.013 0.068 | 0.030 | 0.046 |” 0.046 | 0.035_| 0.051 | 0.058 | 0.040 fru. { 0.016 | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.009} 0.017 0.011 a foo | 0.074 | 0.032 | "0.054 |~0.050_| 0.036 | 0.058} 0.065 0.044 | ° S.o._| 0013 | 0.003 | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.007} o.o1a 0.009 an Can | 0.081 | 0.034 | 0.062 |~0.053_| 0.037 | 0.056 | 0.073 0.048 _ Cio | 0.010 | 0.004 | 0.011 0.007_| 0.003 | 0.006 [0.012 | 0.007 aa foo | 0.088 |” 0.035 | 0.071 | 0.056 _| 0.038 | 0.058 | 0.081 0.052 - fru | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.005 | 0. 002 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.005 Luo | 0.095 | 0.037 | 0.080 | 0.050 0.039 | 0.061 | 0.089 | 0.056 7 S.o._| 0.006 | 0.002 [0.007 [0.008 [0.001] 0.003 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.002 ‘Note: Linear interpolations shall be made between Values shown ee , ED RE N) MIBCASTRO a ‘SIMPLIF zEP (2)? EDITIO mee eee ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY § mas, per 12: “ages the moment coefficients for Positive Momei ye poi ye neparation of Dead and Live oud Paieeeeae Coad: 8 wed in the sae few eet The maximum positive moment for Live loads aes Live load placement i oad ix on te pane! and not on any adjacent panels. This produces ee occurs when the 7 ions at all continuous vel which require restraining, moments, Dead load acro 086 all panels generat . ites rotations that | 0.027 | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.035 | 0.032 0.028 | 0.030 “| 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.027_| 0.032_| 0.035 0.030 | 0.028 0031 | 0.035 | 0.034 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0031 | 0.052 0.029 | 0.029 | 0.024 | 0.029 0.032 | 0.027 | 0.025 | (0.035 | 0.039 | 0.037 | 0.042 | 0.040 | 0.035 0.036 ‘0.027 | 0.026 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.024 0.022 0.049 | 0.043 | 0.041 | 0.046 | 0.045 0.040 | 0.039 or | 0.023 | 0.019 | 0.022 | 0.026 0.022 | 0.020 0,045 | 0.048 | 0.044 | 0.051 | 0.051 0.044 | 0.042 0.022 [0.020 | 0.016 | 0.019 | 0.023 0.019 | 0.017 0.051 | 0.052 | 0.047 | 0.055 0,056 | 0.049 | 0.046 0019 | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.016 0.020 | 0.016 | 0.013 [0.057 | 0.057 0,051 | 0.060 | 0.063 | 0.054 0,050 013 [0017 | 0014 | 001 0.096 0.096 0.040 0.033 0.045, 0.029 0.050, 0.026 0.056 0.023 0.061 0019 0.068 0.016 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.011 0.074 wos | 0.062 | 0.055 | 0.064 0.070 | 0.059 | 0.054 pois {0.010 | 0014 | 0011 | 0.008 0.010 | 0.014 | 0011 | 0.009 * | od 0.077 | 0.065 | 0.059 0.067_| 0.059 _| 0.068 0,007 [0.008 | 0.011 | 0.008 (0,007 0.058 | 0.071 o.ou7 | 0.011 | 0.009 oa | oxo | 0.072 | 0.063 (Ts | 0.085 | 0.070 | 0.063 0.006 | 0.009 7_| [006 [0.009 0,007 _| 0.006 | 0.086 ‘o.o7s | 0.092 | 0.076 | 0.067 0.007 | 0,004 0.007 | 0.005_[ 0.004 lues shown, 24 CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS Table 4 provides the coefficients used to determine shear in the slab and loads on the edge beams, Case? | Case 3 io [ole |o|o|O|@|ai|m im | w, | 050 | oso | 017 | 050 | 083 | 071 | 029 | 033 [067 [ues Ww, | 050 | oso | oss | oso | 017 | 029 | 071 | 067 [035 7 W, oss | 05s | 020 | 055 | 086 | 0.75 | 0.33 | 038 [07 8S w. [oas[ 04s | 080 | 04s | 0.14 | 025 | 067 [062 [039 Ww, 0.60 | 060 | 023 | 060 | oak | 079 | 038 | 043 | ~o75 090 we food} 0400.77 | 040] 0.12 [021 | 062 [057] ~o35 W,[066 | 066 | 028 | 066 | 0.90 | 083 | 043 | 049 |p 79~ uss w, | 034 | 034 | 072 | 034 | 010 | 0.17 | 057 | O51 | oa) w, | on | on [033 |o71 | 092 | 0x6 | 049 | 055 | ons 0x0 [w,_[-020 [029 | 067 | 029 | 008 | 0.14 | 05!_| 045] 0177 w, 076 [076 | 039 | 0.76 | 094 | 088 | 056 | 061 |~o86 | 9% | "w,-024 [024 [061 | 026 | 006 | 0.12 | 044 | 039 | 044 om [oa | osi_| 4s | o81_| 095 [0.91 | 062 [0.68 [09 Ww, | 0.19 | 019 [035 | 0.19 | 005 | 009 [038 | 032] oa w, | 085 | 085 | 053 | 085 | 096 | 0.93 | 069 | a7 | 097 065 [-w, [ois | o1s | 047 | 015 | 004 | 007 | 031 026 | one oa LM | 089 | 089 [oot | 089 [097 | 095 [0.76 | 080| 098] w, | ou | on | 039 | on {| 003 | 005 | 024 | 020 | 006 oss [lM —| 092 | 092 | 069 [092 | ~098 | 0.96 | 081 | 085 | 095 w, | 008 | 008 | 031 | 08 [002 | 0.04 | 0.19 [0.18 | 00s oso |W | 098 | 094 | 076 [098 [099 | 097 | 086 | 089 | 097 w, | 0.06 | 006 | 024 | 006 | 001 | 0.03 | 014 | 011] 003 ‘Note: Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown. PLACING OF REINFORCEMENT ‘The main reinforcement for the two-way slab panel should be placed parallel and perpendicular to the slab edges. The reinforcement in the short direction (L.) should be placed below the reinforcement in the long direction (Lp). Negative reinforcement should be placed perpendicular to the supporting edge beams. Alll other requirements should be observed: 4. Minimum Flexural Reinforcement in Non-prestressed Two-way Slabs (NSCP 2015 Section 408.6.1) b. Flexural Reinforcement Spacing (NSCP 2015 Section 408.7.2) c. Ductility Requirements MJBCASTRO, SIMPLIFIED REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDITION) ; ek 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS a ci Ms: rest pROBLE we BI: 250mm x 550mm B2: 300mm x 550mm Salation: y PANEL A * For Interior Beam B1 From NSCP 2015 Section 428.4.1.8: x is the smaller of: (a) x= hy — A = 550 - 175 = 375mm ~ use (by x= 4h = 4(175) = 700mm Effective Flange Provection of beam = 2x + by = 2(375) + 250 = 1000mm For Edge Beam BI Effective Flange Projection of beam = x + by = 375 + 250 = 625mm Re ummm a CHAPTER B: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 26 For Interior Beam B2 From NSCP 2015 Section 428.4.1.8: xs the smaller of: (a) x= hy —h= 550 ~ 175 = 375mm > use (6) x= 4h =4(175) = 700mm sretve Flange Projection of beam = 2x + By = 2(375) + 300 = 1050mm + For Edge Beam B2: Effective Flange Projection of beam = x + by = 375 + 300 = 675mm Ereatie Flange Projection of eam Effective Flange Projection of beam Eective lange Projection of eam poe h= 175 UY | phe 75 hy = 550 by = 300 Interior eam B2 Edge Beam B2 MIBCASI * RCED a SIMPLIFIED RENT oN) CONCRETE DESIGN 2” orn ee as UBL Ny jean oF 675 375 \ - | 175 Ip = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section 350 Ty = 5977484280mm* ' hy = 300 MPLip TED RE! . ONCRE ‘ED REINFORCED Edge Beam B2 B2 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 3750mm wide 750(175)> . —7 1674804688mm* 5977484280 = = 3.569 1674804688 aoe MIBE ASTRO renme, eum 278 CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-way SLABS Calculation of ary, 625 . 375 + i qT 1175 Ip = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam g a TOSS Section Ty = 5195375100mm* ZZ, 250 Edge Beam BI 6000 125, 6000/2 = 3000 Eeuve width of slab = 3125 BL BI 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 3125mm wide _3125(175)? = = + , B 1395670573mm Ecply _ 5195375100 “= Ea, ~ 139670873 °7? Calculation of ays 1050 375 1 7-4 / | LZ} 1175 ly = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section a j 1, = 7064302315mm* 1 300 Interior Beam B2 INI SIMPLIFIED REIN) CONCRETE DESIGN a ED" MJBCASTRO were 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWo-Way stags a 7200 7400 7200/2 = 3600 | 7400/2 = 3700 Effective width of slab 7300 7300 J, = gross moment of inertia of slab 7300mm wide 7300(175)? | ar aha 3260286458mm* _ Fooly _ 7064302315 _ %s= 5, — 3260286458 ~ ”*67 ication of 43 ae 1 1175 Ip = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section Ip = 6161889839mm* 6200 380) CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS ay + Oe + a3 + Oh Average afm =———g__ 3569 + 3.722 + 2.167 + 2.262 Average dpm = 2980 > 20 Determining Slab Thickness as pet NSCP 2015 Table 408.3.1.2 Amin is the greater of (a) and (b): ln (08 + fa) 6900 + (@) hmin = —3gp9g 7 = 161.548mm = (b) hin = 90M Thus, Min = 161.548mm < 175mm Preliminary Slab Thickness is ok! Therefore, use 175mm thick slab at Panel A > PANELB = For Interior Beam B1: From NSCP 2015 Section 428.4.1.8: x is the smaller of: = 550-175 = 375mm > use 4h = 4(175) = 700mm Effective Flange Projection of beam = 2x + by = 2(375) + 250 = 1000mm + For Edge Beam BI Effective Flange Projection of beam = x + by = 375 + 250 = 625mm = For Interior Beam B2: Effective Flange Projection of beam = 2x + by = 2(375) + 300 = 1050mm (Oy nn eens MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDITIO! AINIAE PORD UINES DRSIC OF TWO-WAY saps any lange Projection of eam "Metive Flange Projection ot heam garectve Fl x roo = | .* = 175 t = 250 by = 250 =F é Interior Beam BI Edge Beam BI Effective Flange Projection of beam 6.0m 5.75m g 2 : MJBCASTRO ML iv cae REINFORCED DESIGN 20 Enraany ESIGN OF TWO-' a sey cuartt RD D DESIG WAY SLABS Cateulation of apn 1050 x rows 78. 1 Deked r “| 1 175 Jy = gross moment of inertia of t Ih =e a of T-Beam ail I = 7064302315 mm* | Lew! 300 Iwterlor Beam 82 7200. “ __7400 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 7300mm wide oe 7300(175)8 e ‘ I, = 5 = 3260286458mm' be Ecyly _ 7064302315 _ nae 1 Bly 3260206458 Calculation of cr: inertia of T-Beam cross section giz: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WaY SLABS ( arte 6000 325,_6000/2 = 3000 _ 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 3125mm wide 75) Es pe = 1395670573mm* Fy Exply _ 5195375100 _ 92 Eel, 1395670573 ~ 1 a: 1175 Jy = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section | st Ip = 7064302315mm* : ESIGN OF TWO-Way ™ prer 12: ANALYSIS AND DESI D-WAY SLABS ae CHA 175)" _ 426028045#mm* 7064302315 _ 706430 = 2.167 260286458 I S Jy = gros it 3 1175. Ip = Bross moment of inertia OF T-Beam ose, I, = 6161889839mm* 6200 6200/2 = 3100 TT, at BL Bt | | | LJ LJ gross moment of inertia of slab 6100mm wide 6100(175)? k= = 2724348958mm* cy, = Eeln _ 6161889839 | Eels 2724348958 ~~ Average dy, = SE1* 42 * Oya + O74 4 2.167 + 3.722 + 2.167 + 2.262 eee 6262 Average ayn, = VETARe Um, 4 = 2.580 > 2.0 D NF MIBCASTRO SIMPLIFIES ba yprrio” CONCRETE DESIGN @ 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS yarl FR ( ing Slab Thickness as per NSCP 2015 Table 408,3.1.2 ent ham s the greater of (a) and (b} f In (08-4 595 ) 7100(0.8 + +t) 2s (a) hymin = =— Ho! = 165.1 ( 36 + 9B 36 +9(2100 0 0) 26mm. 75 4 (b) in = 90 hus, min = 165:126mm < 175mm Preliminary Slab Thickness is ok! verefore, use 175mm thick slab at Panel B , PANEL C + Forinterior Beam BI From NSCP 2015 Section 428.4.1.8 x is the smaller of: (a) x = hy —h = 550-175 = 375mm > use (b) x = 4h = 4(175) = 700mm Effective Flange Projection of beam = 2x + by = 2(375) + 250 = 1000mm * For Interior Beam B2: Effective Flange Projection of beam = 2x + by = 2(375) + 300 = 1050mm Effective Flange Projection of beam Effective Flange Projection of bear MJBCASTRO preR 12: ANAL YSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS oso CHA zim | 7 T ay og PANEL | @ Jy = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section 550 Jy = 7064302315mm* = | | 300 Interior Beam B2 _ 7200 - 7400 - __7200/2= 3600____7400/2= 3700 Eetive width of slab = 7300 we |e B 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 7300mm wide 7300(175)? 1, = Sy — = 3260286458mm* 7064302315, . 3260286158 scone MIBCASTRO SIMPLIFIEN f ey NFO) CONCRETE DESIGN ( | — ER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF - | “i a : a TWO-WAY SLABS aT ty prion of 1? 1000 = ava 375 1 TILL Ss Le \ i 11, = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section Ty = 6161889839mm* 250 Interior Beam BI 6000 r 6000/2 = 3000 c __fective width pf slab TL | n BL Ll | 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 610mm wide 6100(175)? 61000175)" _ 9724348958mm* . 6161889839 oe = 2.262 | 2724348958 (Cleulation of ty . 1050 eb 375, (oO l TTA] bans ty = ross moment of ita of Team cross 60 “ | i he 7064302315mm* 1 | 200 Site ConGtFIED REINFORCED CRETE RETE DESIGN (2 EDITION) tiie | 88) CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 7400 een /2008 7400/2 = 3700 | 7200/2 = 3600 Effective wid of slab = 7300 Bz Ld Bz 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 7300mm wide 1, = 73000175)? = 3260286458mm* * 12 Exyly _ 7064302315 = etl _ 1068302318 — 2167 “P= Fogle 3260286458 Calculation of a4: 175 Jy = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section Tp = 6161889839mm* 1, = gross moment of inertia of slab 6100mm. wide 6100(175)? I= 5 — = 2724348958mm* aaa eeaneeRa a reeommencaaammMEt 2 oie REINFORCED MJBCASTRO com Se TEN (@* EDITION) opr ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS pte ‘ Exply _ 6161889839 (= Fale 2724348958 mee apy tant rat Ope op Te 2 4 8" 9 167 + 2.262 + 2.167 + 2.262 ‘ 2.167 + 2.262 + 2.167 + 2.262 = 2.21! | 4 5 > 2.0 ob 7 sing Sob Thickness as per NSCP 2015 Table 408.31.2 is the greater of (a) and (b): hin bn (08 + in) 7100 (0.8 + iin = TO = 166-445 = (a) Amin 36+ 98 7100 36 +9 (F359) 3 (b) Amin = 90mm Thus, hmin = 166.445mm <175mm__ Preliminary Slab Thickness is ok! Therefore, use 175mm thick slab at Panel C Mp oxen a REINFORCED . joer ETE DESIGN (avo EDI MJBCASTRO a p20" CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO- AY SLABS Solution: From Problem 12.1, use 175mm thick slab for Panel B Floor weight = 23.5(0.175) = 4.113 kPa Total Dead Load = 1.5 + 4.113 = 5.613 kPa The factored floor load is computed as: cm Wa qu 1.2qp. + 1-6qu .2(5.613) + 1.6(4.8) 14.416 kPa > Total Design Moment M, along the 7.4m interior span: From NSCP 2015 Section 408.10.3.2: From Problem 12.1 Gy, = 2.167 ay, = 3.722 a, = 2.167 ay, = 2.262 MJBCASTRO SIMPLLFLED REINFORCED Ti CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDI a “eR 12: ANALYSIS AND D ay, = telat = MOD D* 8 = 554.117 kNm gga Ma stale tbe as follows: (NSCP 2015 Section 408 Section 408.10.4.1) e Factored Moment = ~0.65M, = —0.651 lo . 55: = rored Moment = 0:35M, = 0:35(55 ayetea 260376 im im inter Negativ positive 747 O8tt aye ge = 220 74= 1834 > 1.0 portion of Interior Negative Mu in Column Strip From NSCP 2015 Table 408 10.5.1; Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown. 0.5 — 0.811 _ 05-10 0.90 -* = 9.90-0.75 = 0.807 + Imerior Negative My in Column StP = 0,807(-360-176) = 290.662 Nm Portion of Interior Positive M, in Column Strip ns shall be made between values shown. inear interpolatio From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5:5; Lt er IBCASTRO 291 202) CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 05-0811 05-10 090-x 0.90 0.75 x= 0.807 * Interior Positive M,, in Column Strip = 0.807(193.941) = 156.510 kNm, Portion of Interior Column Strip M,, in Beams From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.7.1 Interior Negative Column Strip M,, in Beam = 0.85(~290.662 ) = ~247.063 km «Interior Negative Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(—290.662 ) = -43.599 kNm © Interior Positive Column Strip M, in Beam = 0.85(156.510) = 133.034 kNm * Interior Positive Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(156.510) = 23.477 kNm jored Moments in Interior Middle Strips NSCP 2015 Section 408,10.6.1 states that portion of negative and positive factored moments resisted by column strips shall be proportionately assigned to corresponding half middle spa = Interior Negative Moment in Middle Strip = —(360.176 — 290.662) = -69.514kNm Interior Positive Moment in Middle Strip = 193.941 — 156.510 = 37.431 kNm > Total Design Moment M, along the 7.4m edge span: From NSCP 2015 Section 408.10,3.2: From Problem 12.1 ay; = 2.167 ay, = 3.722 ay, = 2.167 cy, = 2.262 eiNFORCEP MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED REMY 110) CONCRETE DESIGN (7 : ANALYSIS AND DESI TW a apTER 12 IGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS eae: W _ Qubalh _ 14.416(3.125)(7.1)? 0 = RB? 283.871 kNm sige san, Mo Shall be distributed as follows: (NSCP 2015 Section 408.104.1) an — i Moment = —0.65M, = — Negative Factored fo 0.65(283.871) = —184.511 e Factored Moment = 0.35M, = 0.35(283.871) = 99.355 kNm a Positiv ing these moments to beam and column strips: tbat Note: For this computation, use 1, = length of span in direction that moments are being determined, measured center-to-center of su 1) = length of span transverse to Ly, measured center-to-center of supports ‘oeenter of sippors Edge Beam B1 Ey 2Ecsls acs X@ ~ 0632) 2503 (550, 175) (1753(375) c= (1 — 0.63 =) CE ») + (a — 0.63 ze) ee ) C = 2517235677mm* B 74 1, = 2400075)" _ 3304947917mm* 12 = Feo(2517235677 B= 5s ) 9.381 eee 2E,5(3304947917) Sip, ‘LIF ‘1 Cons Ey REINFORCED MIBCASTRO DESIGN (28? EDITION) 204 CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY ABS. Portion of Exterior Negative M,, in Column Strip From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.2; Linear interpolations shall be made between values sy shown, o | 10 1.0 10-a 1.0-b “T9-09 10-075 = 0.985, b = 0.962 0.971 = Exterior Negative M,, in Column Strip = 0.971(-184.516 ) = -179.165 kNm Portion of Exterior Positive M,, in Column Strip From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.5; Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown, 05 0.90 811 x 1.0 0.75 05-0811 0. “090=x — 0.90-0.75 x= 0.807 = Exterior Positive M,, in Column Strip = 0.807(99.355) = 80.179 kNm Portion of Exterior Column Strip M, in Beams From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.7.1 Exterior Negative Column Strip My in Beam = 0.85(—179.165) = —152.290 kN ‘terior Negative Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(-179.165) = -27.875 kNm Exterior Positive Column Strip M,, in Beam = 0.85(80.179) = 68.152 kNm Exterior Positive Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(80.179) = 12.027 kNm en ; ‘RCED SIMPLIFIED RENDITION) CONCRETE DESIGN ( nett MJBCASTRO al 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 295 ure wy red Moments in Interior Middle Strips Facto cp 2015 Section 408. 10.6.1 states that portion of negative and positive factored moments not a by column strips shall be proportionately assigned to corresponding half middle strips. Exterior Negative Moment in Middle Strip = —(184.516 — 179.165) = —5.351 kNm Exterior Positive Moment in Middle Strip = 99.355 — 80.179 = 19.176 kNm ——— t i 8 (ec Exterior 3 coe Colum stip dace -_——— i a ' 8 18 a { Middle Suip ge ' $B gs as BF 1 34 Bh iota a 4--2 a S8 1 33 £3 Ne ee Interior ge pigt Colum Strip . + eat sé | Interior gs || Colum stip oa __ oa Tu | | | | We CO REINFORCED DESIGN (2 EDITION) MJBCASTRO 906" CHAPTER 12; ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS, Total Design Moment M, along the 6. 0m end span: > From NSCP 2015 Section 408.10. 7.2m 74m ef — aii L, rT 3H an From Problem 12,1 &) & y 4 ‘| g PANEL // hy j PANEL || ‘ | A yi ® ays = 2.167 Uy} pg = 2.262 ay 2 14.416(7.3)(5.75)? lo =e 14416(7.3)(6.75)" 7 Y= 434.924 kNm In aneend span, M, shall be distributed as follows: (NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.4.2) fp = -0.70(434.924) = = Interior Negative Factored Moment = -0.70M, = = Positive Factored Moment = 0.57M, = 0.57(434.924) = 247.907 kNm 0.16M, = —0.16(434.924) = —69.588 kNm Exterior Negative Factored Moment 304.447 kNm Distributing these moments to beam and column strips: "Note: For this computation, use length of span in direction that moments are being determined, measured center-to-center of supports Lz = length of span transverse to L,, measured center-to-center of supports ly _T4 Lag 7 1233 Ds 2 = (2167) 74 = 2673 > 10 one Portion of Interior Negative M, in Column Strip From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.1; Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown oRCED SIMPLIFIED RE! “ EIN TION) MJBCASTRO CONCRETE DESIGN ( ES ptt 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 27 H — ‘ jit} Se [4233 [x 1233 10-20 0.75 =0.45 x = 0.680 interior Negative My in Column Strip = 0 680(—304.447) = -207.024 kNm from NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.57.1 ive Column Stnp M,, in Beam = 0.85(-207.024) = -175.970 kNm + Interior Negat ive Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(—207.024) = -31.054 kNm «Interior Negat portion of Exterior Negative My in Column Strip From NSCP 2015 Section 408 10.5.2: 1050 J, = gross moment of inertia of T-Beam cross section Jy = 7064: 302315mm* / 300) /300°(550)) | c= (1-068555)(—3 ¢ = 4194929688mm* 2679687500mm* % ; cont ‘FIED REINFORCED. MJBCASTRO ETE DESIGN 2% EDITION) ee eemeuausill cunt 208) CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS, From NSCP 2015 Table 408. 10.5.2: Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown, a= 0.944, b = 0.876 ] 10-1233 10 ~20 0.944 0.944 — 0.876 x= 0.928 = Exterior Negative M, in Column Strip = 0.928(-69.588) = -64.578 kNm From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.7.1 * Exterior Negative Column Strip M,, in Beam = 0.85(—64.578) + Exterior Negative Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(-64.578 54.891 kNm —9.687 kNm. Portion of Positive M,, in Column Strip From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5.5; Linear interpolations shall be made between values shown. x = 0.680 © Positive My in Column Stri From NSCP 2015 Table 408.10.5, 0.680(247.907) = 168,577 kNm t Positive Column Strip M,, in Beam = 0.85( 168.57 P l 7) = 143.290 kNm * Positive Column Strip M,, in Slab = 0.15(168.577) = 25.287 kNm MIBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDITION) SS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS wit " gactored Moments it Interior Middle Strips Section 408.10.6.1 states that portion of negative and positive factored moments not sitive fa 5 nat sch 2015 NN ed ty column sis shall be proportionately assigned to corresponding half middle strip’ | e strips «terior Negative Moment in Middle Strip = ~(304.447 ~ 207.024) = -97423 km tmeige Moment in Mile Strip = 247.907 ~ 168.577 = 79, P 577 = 79,37 Feige Negative Moment in Middle Strip = ~(69.588 ~ eaay Seen spesign Moment M along the 6.0m end span: 7 ‘Tots fom NSCP 2015 Section 408.10.3.2: 74m — 7.2m ly in) From Problem 12.1: E |e x |g a “ oe m Ww W a [ft | ayy = 2.262 Lyl2,_ 14.416(7:3, 5.75)? M, = 24 = 14.416(7.3)(5.75)" _ 434924 kN 8 8 | Interior Negative Column Strip My, in Beam = 0.85(~207.024) =175,970 kNm + Interior Negative Column Strip My in Slab = 0.15(—207.024) = -31.054 kNm + Exterior Negative Column Strip M, in Beam 0,85(—64.578) = —54.891 kNm + Exterior Negative Colurn Strip My in Slab = .15(—64.578) = -9.687 kNm = 0.85(168.577) = 143.290 kNm * Positive Column Strip M, in Beam 01 5(168.577) = 25,287 kNm * Positive Column Strip My i Stab = s Interior Negative Moment in Middle Strip = ~ (304.447 ~ 207.024) = ~ 97.423 kNm Postive Mament in Midile Strip = 247.907 ~ 168577 = 79, 330 kNm {98 — 64.578) = 5.010 kN Exterior Negative Moment in Middle Strip = (695) Simpy AFIED REINFORCE CONCRETE RELNFORCED MJBCASTRO DI (2? EDITION) WUE ogo" CHAPTER 12: ANA LYSIS AND D ESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 1 | ' \ 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' +9300 saszm/2) | 42520772 g +asaur/2||+28207/2 | Ve sized| | = 412644! é Tiinat) |Snnoee | f | , < || 1 I | i | ‘ ' i | 1 1 || \ I =so0se2 | |-31.054/2 | 97.423 1 31.054/2 | | -31.084/2 | to-tsse7 | [215527 | (essa? | era) 1 1 — ee 1 1 ' } \ 1 1 | ! 1 i) 1 t 1 ! ! t | Interior Iterior Interior Interior Colum Strip Colum Strip Middle Strip Colum Strip Colum Strip | Note: Column strip exists in both sides of the beam. Since we are considering the part on one side only, the value of the moment computed to slab must be divided by 2. However, the middle strip is no longer divided by 2 because the same moment is computed on the opposite column strip. ee LAL aa MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED RE! INFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDITION a0 My 175 —20 -2 = 149mm 7.40m AL _ BL BZ BC et C2 eh c3 [ -see4 | +12644 | -15527 | -s.o10 | +79.330 | -97.423 | -aae4 | +12.644 | -15.527 135000 | 1350.00 | 1350.00 | 3000.00 | 3000.00 | 3000.00 | 1350.00 | 1350.00 | 1350.00 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 | 149.00 iso | 0469 | 0576 | o0s4 | 1323 | 1625 | 0180 | o469 | 0576 | 0.00044 | 0.00115 | 0.00141 | 0.00020 | 0.00332 | 0.00412 | 0.00044 | o.o11s | 0.00141 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 9.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00412 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 0.00338 | 679.887 | 679.887 | 679.807 | 1510.86 | 1510.86 | 1641.64 | 679.887 | 679.887 | 679.887 166.347 | 166.347 | 166.347 | 74056 | 74.856 | 61411 | 166347 | 166.347 | 166.347 150 150 150 50 50 50 150 150 150 top | Bouom | top [top | Bowom | Top | Top | Bowom [Top pea AL AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY § CHAPTER Ds A ABS oe ee ea [Pa Ta a Feo iesen | eso0 | axson | onan | v4o000 | v000 | a47500 | treo {im Fed) 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | tw9.00 | 9.00 wae | i a [Ry] tows | ona | tos | ose oa | 0486 | 0798 TP gaa os — 3 Taooor 1 on sone | oootes | ooo Poca 00108 Pes Ag | ars | eee | onzes | seisoae | 22isoat | 22isomn om [oe coun | esa Paar [os] teasns | vosazs | tosses | snoas | stom | staat { totsas | teaaas Use s 150 | 150 | 150 | so af | 180 [Position | toy | rowom | top | tay | Bovtom Top ton | Pun Shall be the greater af (a) or (bY: 0.25 Vf. 0.25V2T he 414 A 14 ae .00338 > govern @ Prin = = 0.00277 ©) Pin = Spacing of bars: 10004, Ay But according to NSCP Section 408.7,2.2, maximum spacing s of deformed longitudinal reinforcement shall be the lesser of 2h and 450mm at ctitical sections. a. 2h=2(175) b. 450mm. 50mm > 150mm ok! Inaddition, the minimum fleyural reinforcement in accordance with NSCP Section 408.6, 1.1 requires 2088 steel ratios of 0.002 for f, < 420MPa bao yu)? * yooa7s) = 32 mm > 150mm ok! FORCE MJBCAS SIMPLIFIED REINFORC MJBCASTRO CONCRETE DERIGN (2° EDITIO ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY 61 ER 12: . ca? ABS wo Solution: Wpp = Wsta + 1.5 = 23.5(0.175) + 1.5 = 5.613 kPa wu, = 48 KPa The factored floor load is computed as: wy = L.2wp, + 1.6022 Wapr = 1.2(5.613) = 6.736 kPa Wyn = 1.6(4.8) = 7.68 kPa wy = 14.416 kPa Ly _ 5.75 Jom m= =——~ = 0810 I, 74 Case 8: Three Edges Continuous (One Long Edge Continuous) Effective depth, d = h d,/2 = 175 — 20 - 12/2 = 149mm by fa dlscontinuos MJBCASTRO ggg CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS Coefficients: > Coefficients for Negative Moments in Slab Using Table 1: rset ER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-Way S| AI Hart coefficients for Dead Load Positive Moments in Slab ¥ ing Table 2 | | | @ 0036 | 0018 | 0, t 36 | 98 0.040 | 0 [ro0ss | oo1e 0022 oid 05s a 005 oot Ta Tas ie lar al beeen Vl iow For Cp, 0.80 0.032 0.810 Gin 0.85 0.029 0.80-0.810 __0.80 - 0.85 0.032—Czp, 0.032 — 0.029 Coo. = 0.0314 For Cty. 0.80 0.015 0.810 Crp oes | 0.017 0.80 — 0.810 __0.80 - 0.85 0.015—Cfp, 0.015 - 0.017 = Cho. = 0.0154 LIFIED REINFORCE! ‘CRE’ FORCED MJBCASTRO ‘TE DESIGN (28? EDITION) SEE CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS 0 fer Positive Mi For Chu uu _| [o0407} 0.80 — 0.810 0.80 — 0.85 0.044 — Czy, ~ T.044 — 0.040 aot FR D2 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS goments in Stab negative Moments in Stab Mz = Ca Mule” = 0.0538(14.416)(5.75)? = 25.643 kNm My = CyWubn’ = 0.0420(14.416)(7.10)? = 30.522 kNm Positive Moments in Slab, Mj Wuptla’ = 0.0314(6.736)(5.75)? = 6.993 kNm Maou Miu. = Ci Wuriba’ = 0.0432(7.68)(5.75)? = 10.969 kNm do. + Mau = 6.993 + 10.969 = 17.962 kNm Positive Moments in Slab, Mj piWuvily? = 0.0154(6.736)(7.10)? = 5.229 kNm Mion Mis = Churn’? = 0.0196(7.68)(7.10)? = 7.588 kNm Mi = Mito. + Mii, = 5.229 + 7.588 = 12.817 kNm > For Discontinuous End M, == a discontinuous 1 i = 3 (17.962) = 5.987 kNm Spacing of reinforcement + Minimum Steel Ratio (NSCP 2015 Section 4096.12) Pmin shall be the greater of (a) or (b) 025/f. _ 0.25V21 (a) p, et = 0.00277 aes 414 (b) p, = = —— = 0.00338 + govern Bow ata * Minimums t exural Reinforcement in Non-prestressed Two-way Slabs 408.6 1) Agnain © U.0020A, ~ 0.002bK = 0.002(1000)(175) 450 min (NSCEP 2015 Secon 408.7 2) Hexural Reinforcement Spacing, Maximurn spacing # shall be the lesser of SIMPL ip one Ete REINFORCED ETE DESIGN (2% EDITION) NSUP 2015 Sev MJBCASTRO- sa CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS (a) 2h = 2(175) = 350 mm ~ govern (b) 450mm * — Ductility Requirement mash) 328500085 Pmax = 7 ) = 01se fy > Spacing at Negative Moments in Slab + For Mg = 25.643 kNm > f M, = Opfybd? (1 = 0599 2 414 25.643 x 10° = 0.90p(414)(1000)(149)? (1 ~ 0 59—) p = 0.00322 < Pyaini Use p = 0.00338 < Pax ok! A, = phd = 0.00338(1000)(149) = 503.62 mm? > 350 mm?, ok! Spacing. F (1000)4, _ (1000) 5 (12) 224.569 mm < 350 mm, ok! 503.62 * ForM; = 30 kNm M, = Opfybd? (1 - 0.59 30.522 x 10° = 0.90p(414)(1000)(149)? (1-0. sop) = 0.00386 > Pyxini Use p = 0.00386 p = 0.00386 < a Oh! bd = 0.00386(1000)(149) = 14mm? > 350 mm?, ok! Spacing (aoo0)a, _ (1000) 5 (12)* caarasaae Tg = 196.643 mm < 350 mm,ok! AS SET SSE ced ee SIMPLIFIED RE ON) CONCRETE DESIGN 2 FI | 12: ANALYSIS AND DE! vr OF TWO-WAY SLABS cu agacingat oive Moments in Sa, mg For Mg = 17. 962 kNm 2(4-059p2 M, = Opfyba! ( SS ossph) 17.962 x 10° = 0.90p(414)(1000)(149)? (1 - 05994) p = 0.00223 < Pmini Use p = 0.00338 p = 0.00338 < Prax Ok! |, = phd = 0.00338(1000)(149) = 503.62 mm? > 350 mm?,ok! Spacing: (1000)4, _ (1000) % (12)? i, =—s03.62 = 224-569 mm < 350 mm, ok! > Spacing at Positive Moments in Slab, Mj « ForM; = 12.817 kNm M, = Opfybd? ( - 05998) 414 12.817 x 108 = 0.90p¢414)(1000)(149)? (1 - 059) p = 0.00158 < pmnini Use p = 0.00338 P= 0.00338 < pmax Ok! Ag = pbd = 0.00338(1000)(149) = 503.62 mm? > 350 mm?, ok! Spacing: 1 2. 1000) 7 (12 5 = 1000) _ (1000) 3 12) 994.569 mm < 350 mm, ok! As 503.62 MJBCASTRO- 3N OF TWO-WAY SL. 310. CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF T ABS > Spacing at Discontinuous End, Mg q)scontinuous = 5.987 kNm * For Ma aiscontinuous M, = Oniba (1-059F) 5.987 x 10° = 0.909(414)(1000)(149)* (1 ~0.59p x) Pp = 0.00073 < pmini Use p = 0.00338 Pp = 0.00338 < pmax ok! Ay = phd = 0.00338(1000)(149) = 503.62 mm? > 350 mm?, ok! Spacing: r 2 0) 5 (12 5 = 1000) An _ a = 224.569 mm < 350 mm, ok! As Note: It isnot feasible to use a different spacing while adopting a bent bar. We will use th common round down spacing | 25643 | 0.00322 | 0.00338 Positive Moment. Mg [17.962 _| 0.00223 | 0.00338 Negative Moment, 224.569 224.569 12mm0 @ | 200mm Mn discontiu 5.987 | 0.00073 | 0.00338 | 224.569 Negative Moment, My |”"30.522| "0100386 | 0.00386 | 196649 Positive Moment. M, | 12.817 | 0.00158 1 0.003368 224.569 | 12mmd@ | 150mm MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED REINFORCED S AND DESIGN OF TWO-Way SLABS Tw Solution: Wo = Wsiav + 4 = 23.54(0.150) + 4 = 7.531 kPa wun = 4:8 kPa 5.0m The factored floor load is computed as: Wy = 1L2Wp, + LOW, 4.0m Wupn = 1.2(7.513) = 9.037 kPa Wut = 1.6(4.8) = 7.68 kPa Wy = 16.717 kPa Case 4: Two Adjacent Edges Continuous Effective depth, d = h ~ cc ~ dy/2 = 150 — 20 — 12/2 = 124mm For Middle Strip along short direction, MZ * Coefficients: > Coefficient for Negative Moments in Slab Using Table 1: Gz a * Coefficient for Using Te egig) CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND > M Mz = + = Ct fa.pi = Cap. Wun faut DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS Positive Moments in Slab, Mt whe? = 0.039(9.037)(4.0)? = 5.639 kNm t1.Wunrla? = 0.048(7.68)(4.0)? = 5.898 kNm ton + Maus = 5.639 + 5.898 = 11.537 kNm > For Discontinuous End Maaiscontinuous = 3 4 Spacing of reinforcement: 5M = 41537) = 3.846 kNm Minimum Steel Ratio (NSCP 2015 Section 409.6.1.2) Pmin Shall be the greater of (a) or (b): o2s/k _ 0.25V28 (@) Pmin = =e = 0.00378 ty a 350 = 3p = 0.00400 + govern Minimum Flexural Reinforcement in Non-prestressed Two-way Slabs (NSCP 2015 Section 408.6.1) = 0.0020A, = 0.002bh = 0.002(1000)(150) = 300 mm? As.min Flexural Reinforcement Spacing (NSCP 2015 Section 408.7.2) Maximum spacing s shall be the lesser of: (a) 2h = 2(150) = 300 mm (b) 450mm Ductility Requirement _ 3(Se) _ 3 (resczane 85) Pax = = ax = 7| 7 350 ) = 00248 NSE eR MJBCASTRO. INFORCED SIMPLIFIED REINFORT CONCRETE DESIGN (2°? EDIT - (HAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS ai spacing at Negative Moment in s jab + For My = 18.991 kNm M, = Opfybd? (: 9.5997 19,991 x 10° = 0. 900(350)(1000)(124)? (1 - 0595) p= 0.00404 > pynini Use p = 0.00404 p 0.00404 < Pinay Ok! |, = phd = 0.00404(1000)(124) = 500.96 mm2 > 300 mm?, ok! Spacing: (1000)Ay _ (1000) 5 (12)? A! 500.96 = 225.761 mm < 300 mm,ok! 25.761 mm for Mz » Spacing at Positive Moment in Slab, Mg * For Mf = 11.537 kNm h M, = Opfybd? ( - o59pf) 11.537 x 10° = 0.90p(350)(1000)(124)? (1 -0. 59p2r) P= 0.00243 < pmrini Use p = 0.00400 P= 0.00400 < Pinay Ok! A, = phd = 0.00400(1000)(124) = 496 mm? > 300 mm?, ok! Spacing. CY 7 (1000)Ay (1000) 5 (12)? 496 228.019 mm < 300 mm, ok! Thus, use s = 228.019 mm for Mj LS MPL ‘ arte REINFORCED Eee TE DESIGN (2% EDITION) — 314 CHAPTER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS > Spacing at Discontinuous End, Mz aiscontinuous © ForMz = 3.846 kNm fa discontinuous h M, = Opfybd? ( ~ 05907 350 3.846 x 10° = 0.909(350)(1000)(124)? (1 = 059) P= 0.00080 < Pruini Use p = 0.00400 p= 0.00400 < pinay ok! A, = pbd = 0.00400(1000)(124) = 496 mm? > 300 mm2, ok! Spacing: n (1000)4, _ (1000) 3 (12)? Ay 496 = 228.019 mm < 300 mm, ok! Thus, use 5 = 228.019 mm for M; aiccontinuous Note: It is not feasible to use a diflerent spacing while adopting a bent bar. We will use the common round down spacing ae c n) _ (mm) Negative Moment.Mg | 18.991 | 0.00404 | 0.00404 | 225,761 Positive Moment, Ma | 11.537 _| 0.00243 | 0.00400 | 228.019 | Negative Moment, | 3.846 0.00080 | 0.00400 | 228.019 Magiscontinuous | | Therefore, use § = 225 mm for the middle strip along short direction MJBCASTRO SIMPLIFIED REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 2°? EDITION. japTeER 12: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TWO-WAY SLABS. BONS cl ARY PROBLEMS: MENT rel building of 175mm. Use f, = 414 MPa and ff =. column. Check the NSCP equation to determine: Panel to be designed Columns: 300mm x 300mm. Beams: 300mm x 550mm. BE: 250mm x 550mm BY 300mm x 550mm 6.0m REINFORCED MJBCASTRO SIGN 2°” EDITION)

You might also like