CCNP ENCOR Command Reference
CCNP ENCOR Command Reference
Packet Forwarding
2.Spanning Tree Protocol
6.1.VRF
7.EIGRP
EIGRP Route Summarization
Unicast Neighbours
In EIGRP, Multicast Address 224.0.0.10 is used . If you want , you can
change this to a specific neighbour address with “neighbour ip-
address” command on Cisco routers. You can use this command like
below:
Router (config) # router eigrp 100
In the previous lab, we saw equal-cost load balancing in action. Now it’s time
to do a little unequal-cost balancing, using this network:
R1’s routing table shows EIGRP equal-cost load balancing in action. The metrics
for the two available paths to 172.12.23.0 /27 are exactly the same, so both
paths are in the routing table.
Checking R1’s EIGRP topology table, we note there are two entries for both
2.2.2.0 /24 and 3.3.3.0 /24. Each route has one successor and one feasible
successor.
Our routing would be more efficient if we balanced the load from R1 to
2.2.2.0 /24 over those two available paths. The metrics of those two paths are
so close (2297856 and 2300416) that it doesn’t make sense to leave one idle
while letting the other path handle the full load for traffic heading for 2.2.2.0
/24.
That’s where EIGRP unequal-cost load balancing comes in. EIGRP runs equal-
cost load balancing by default, but unequal-cost balancing requires a little
configuration, a little math, and an eye for details and unexpected results.
We’ll use all of those as we proceed with this lab.
1. The router will multiple the Feasible Distance of the route by the
variance value.
2. Any feasible successor with a metric less than that new value will be
entered into the routing table.
In print, I admit that sounds a little confusing, perhaps even a tad askew.
Thankfully, the reality of this command is simple. Consider the two paths from
R1 to R2’s loopback in the topology table.
The successor has a metric of 2297856. By setting the EIGRP variance to 2 on
R1, any route to 2.2.2.0 /24 with a metric of less than 4595712 (2 x 2297856) will
be entered into the EIGRP routing table and will participate in unequal-cost
load sharing. The only feasible successor to that route has a metric of
2300416, so it certainly qualifies! Let’s run variance 2 on R1.
With unequal-cost load balancing enabled, R1’s EIGRP routing table now shows
both the successor and feasible successor for 2.2.2.0 /24. Note that the actual
metrics of the routes do not change.
The feasible successor and successor are also showing up for R3’s loopback
network. This illustrates a very important point regarding variance, and you
gotta watch out for it – it’s an all-or-nothing command. When you
change variance, you’re changing it for your router’s entire EIGRP configuration.
(That’s one of the important variance tips I mentioned at the top of the page.
The second one’s coming up.)
You can verify the variance setting with our pal show ip protocols.
Note the maximum path value of 4. This value defines how many paths can be
used for load balancing to a single destination. You can change the value from
the default of 4 with the maximum-paths command, but if you set it to 1, you’re
disabling load balancing!
You might have looked at that lab and thought “Hey, I don’t need to do any
math. I’ll just enter variance 255 and I’ll get all the load balancing I want!”
You also might just get load balancing you don’t want. Let’s say we have three
valid paths to the same network. Path 1 has a metric of 5000, Path 2 a metric
of 7000, and Path 3 a metric of 55000. That gives us two links with similar
speeds and a third path that’s way out of line when compared to the other
two. Do you really want to load balance over that third path? Probably not. It’s
a good backup link, but not one I want to use in load balancing.
Bonus tip: With unequal-cost load balancing in effect, the load each link carries
is proportional to the metric. If one path’s metric is twice as good as another,
that path will carry roughly twice as much data.
8. OSPF
9.Advanced OSPF
Summarization
Area filtering
Distributed Lists -> To avoid a network to be installed into the local RIB
10.OSPFv3
OSPFv3 IPv4
Configurations took it from an OSPFv3 lab on routers and
switches:
On switches:
Summarization:
Show commands:
11.BGP
IPv6 Configuration
R2# show bgp ipv4 unicast neighbors 10.1.2.1 advertised-routes