cs224n 2023 Lecture01 Wordvecs1
cs224n 2023 Lecture01 Wordvecs1
Key learning today: The (astounding!) result that word meaning can be represented rather
well by a (high-dimensional) vector of real numbers
2
Course logistics in brief
• Instructor: Christopher Manning
• Head TA: John Hewitt
• Course Manager: Amelie Byun. Course Coordinator: John Cho
• TAs: Many wonderful people! See website
• Time: Tu/Th 4:30–5:50 Pacific time, Nvidia Aud. (→ video)
• We’ve put a lot of other important information on the class webpage. Please read it!
• http://cs224n.stanford.edu/
a.k.a., http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs224n/
• TAs, syllabus, help sessions/office hours, Ed (for all course questions/discussion)
• Office hours start Wednesday afternoon!
• Python/numpy and then PyTorch tutorials: First two Fridays. First is 2:30-3:30, Gates B03.
• Slide PDFs uploaded before each lecture
3
4
What do we hope to teach? (A.k.a. “learning goals”)
1. The foundations of the effective modern methods for deep learning applied to NLP
• Basics first, then key methods used in NLP in 2023: Word vectors, feed-forward
networks, recurrent networks, attention, encoder-decoder models, transformers,
large pre-trained language models, etc.
3. An understanding of and ability to build systems (in PyTorch) for some of the major
problems in NLP:
• Word meaning, dependency parsing, machine translation, question answering
5
Course work and grading policy
• 5 x 1-week Assignments: 6% + 4 x 12%: 54%
• HW1 is released today! Due next Tuesday! At 4:30 p.m.
• Submitted to Gradescope in Canvas (i.e., using @stanford.edu email for your Gradescope account)
• Final Default or Custom Course Project (1–3 people): 43%
• Project proposal: 5%, milestone: 5%, poster or web summary: 3%, report: 30%
• Participation: 3%
• Guest lecture reactions, Ed, course evals, karma – see website!
• Late day policy
• 6 free late days; afterwards, 1% off course grade per day late
• Assignments not accepted more than 3 days late per assignment unless given permission in advance
• Collaboration policy: Please read the website and the Honor Code!
Understand allowed collaboration and how to document it: Don’t take code off the
web; acknowledge working with other students; write your own assignment solutions
6
High-Level Plan for Assignments (to be completed individually!)
• Ass1 is hopefully an easy on ramp – a Jupyter/IPython Notebook
• Ass2 is pure Python (numpy) but expects you to do (multivariate) calculus, so you really
understand the basics
• Ass3 introduces PyTorch, building a feed-forward network for dependency parsing
• Ass4 and Ass5 use PyTorch on a GPU (Microsoft Azure)
• Libraries like PyTorch, Tensorflow, and Jax are now the standard tools of DL
• For Final Project, more details presented later, but you either:
• Do the default project, which is a question answering system
• Open-ended but an easier start; a good choice for many
• Propose a custom final project, which we approve
• You will receive feedback from a mentor (TA/prof/postdoc/PhD)
• Can work in teams of 1–3; can use any language/packages
7
Lecture Plan
1. The course (10 mins)
2. Human language and word meaning (15 mins)
3. Word2vec introduction (15 mins)
4. Word2vec objective function gradients (25 mins)
5. Optimization basics (5 mins)
6. Looking at word vectors (10 mins or less)
8
Trained on text data, neural machine translation is quite good!
https://kiswahili.tuko.co.ke/
GPT-3: A first step on the path to foundation models
The SEC said, “Musk, your tweets are a S: I broke the window.
blight. Q: What did I break?
S: I gracefully saved the day.
They really could cost you your job,
Q: What did I gracefully save?
if you don't stop all this tweeting at night.” S: I gave John flowers.
Then Musk cried, “Why? Q: Who did I give flowers to?
The tweets I wrote are not mean, S: I gave her a rose and a guitar.
I don't use all-caps Q: Who did I give a rose and a guitar to?
and I'm sure that my tweets are clean.” How many users have signed up since the start of 2020?
“But your tweets can move markets SELECT count(id) FROM users
WHERE created_at > ‘2020-01-01’
and that's why we're sore.
What is the average number of influencers each user is
You may be a genius and a billionaire, subscribed to?
but it doesn't give you the right to SELECT avg(count) FROM ( SELECT user_id, count(*)
be a bore!” FROM subscribers GROUP BY user_id )
AS avg_subscriptions_per_user
ChatGPT: A recent, intriguing set of capabilities
ChatGPT: A recent, intriguing set of capabilities
ChatGPT: A recent, intriguing set of capabilities
How do we represent the meaning of a word?
tree ⟺ {🌳, 🌲, 🌴, …}
16
How do we have usable meaning in a computer?
Previously commonest NLP solution: Use, e.g., WordNet, a thesaurus containing lists of
synonym sets and hypernyms (“is a” relationships)
e.g., synonym sets containing “good”: e.g., hypernyms of “panda”:
from nltk.corpus import wordnet as wn from nltk.corpus import wordnet as wn
poses = { 'n':'noun', 'v':'verb', 's':'adj (s)', 'a':'adj', 'r':'adv'}
for synset in wn.synsets("good"):
panda = wn.synset("panda.n.01")
print("{}: {}".format(poses[synset.pos()], hyper = lambda s: s.hypernyms()
", ".join([l.name() for l in synset.lemmas()]))) list(panda.closure(hyper))
noun: good
[Synset('procyonid.n.01'),
noun: good, goodness
Synset('carnivore.n.01'),
noun: good, goodness
Synset('placental.n.01'),
noun: commodity, trade_good, good
Synset('mammal.n.01'),
adj: good
Synset('vertebrate.n.01'),
adj (sat): full, good
Synset('chordate.n.01'),
adj: good
Synset('animal.n.01'),
adj (sat): estimable, good, honorable, respectable
Synset('organism.n.01'),
adj (sat): beneficial, good
Synset('living_thing.n.01'),
adj (sat): good
Synset('whole.n.02'),
adj (sat): good, just, upright
Synset('object.n.01'),
…
Synset('physical_entity.n.01'),
adverb: well, good
Synset('entity.n.01')]
adverb: thoroughly, soundly, good
17
Problems with resources like WordNet
• A useful resource but missing nuance:
• e.g., “proficient” is listed as a synonym for “good”
This is only correct in some contexts
• Also, WordNet list offensive synonyms in some synonym sets without any
coverage of the connotations or appropriateness of words
• Missing new meanings of words:
• e.g., wicked, badass, nifty, wizard, genius, ninja, bombest
• Impossible to keep up-to-date!
• Subjective
• Requires human labor to create and adapt
• Can’t be used to accurately compute word similarity (see following slides)
18
Representing words as discrete symbols
In traditional NLP, we regard words as discrete symbols:
hotel, conference, motel – a localist representation
19
Sec. 9.2.2
But:
motel = [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0]
hotel = [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
These two vectors are orthogonal
There is no natural notion of similarity for one-hot vectors!
Solution:
• Could try to rely on WordNet’s list of synonyms to get similarity?
• But it is well-known to fail badly: incompleteness, etc.
• Instead: learn to encode similarity in the vectors themselves
20
Representing words by their context
• Distributional semantics: A word’s meaning is given
by the words that frequently appear close-by
• “You shall know a word by the company it keeps” (J. R. Firth 1957: 11)
• One of the most successful ideas of modern statistical NLP!
• When a word w appears in a text, its context is the set of words that appear nearby
(within a fixed-size window).
• We use the many contexts of w to build up a representation of w
0.286 0.413
0.792 0.582
−0.177 −0.007
banking = −0.107 monetary = 0.247
0.109 0.216
−0.542 −0.718
0.349 0.147
0.271 0.051
Note: word vectors are also called (word) embeddings or (neural) word representations
They are a distributed representation
22
Word meaning as a neural word vector – visualization
0.286
0.792
−0.177
−0.107
expect = 0.109
−0.542
0.349
0.271
0.487
23
3. Word2vec: Overview
Word2vec (Mikolov et al. 2013) is a framework for learning word vectors
Idea:
• We have a large corpus (“body”) of text: a long list of words
• Every word in a fixed vocabulary is represented by a vector
• Go through each position t in the text, which has a center word c and context
(“outside”) words o
• Use the similarity of the word vectors for c and o to calculate the probability of o given
c (or vice versa)
• Keep adjusting the word vectors to maximize this probability
24
Word2Vec Overview
Example windows and process for computing 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+𝑗 | 𝑤𝑡
𝑃 𝑤𝑡−2 | 𝑤𝑡 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+2 | 𝑤𝑡
𝑃 𝑤𝑡−1 | 𝑤𝑡 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+1 | 𝑤𝑡
25
Word2Vec Overview
Example windows and process for computing 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+𝑗 | 𝑤𝑡
𝑃 𝑤𝑡−2 | 𝑤𝑡 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+2 | 𝑤𝑡
𝑃 𝑤𝑡−1 | 𝑤𝑡 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+1 | 𝑤𝑡
26
Word2vec: objective function
For each position 𝑡 = 1, … , 𝑇, predict context words within a window of fixed size m,
given center word 𝑤𝑡 . Data likelihood:
𝑇
Likelihood = 𝐿 𝜃 = ෑ ෑ 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+𝑗 | 𝑤𝑡 ; 𝜃
𝜃 is all variables 𝑡=1 −𝑚≤𝑗≤𝑚
𝑗≠0
to be optimized
exp(𝑢𝑜𝑇 𝑣𝑐 )
𝑃 𝑜𝑐 = 𝑇𝑣 )
σ𝑤∈𝑉 exp(𝑢𝑤 𝑐
28
Word2Vec with Vectors
• Example windows and process for computing 𝑃 𝑤𝑡+𝑗 | 𝑤𝑡
• 𝑃 𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑠 | 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 short for P 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑠 | 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 ; 𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑠 , 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 , 𝜃
29
Word2vec: prediction function
② Exponentiation makes anything positive
① Dot product compares similarity of o and c.
𝑢𝑇 𝑣 = 𝑢. 𝑣 = σ𝑛𝑖=1 𝑢𝑖 𝑣𝑖
exp(𝑢𝑜𝑇 𝑣𝑐 ) Larger dot product = larger probability
𝑃 𝑜𝑐 = 𝑇𝑣 )
σ𝑤∈𝑉 exp(𝑢𝑤 𝑐
③ Normalize over entire vocabulary
to give probability distribution
30
To train the model: Optimize value of parameters to minimize loss
To train a model, we gradually adjust parameters to minimize a loss
• We optimize these parameters by walking down the gradient (see right figure)
• We compute all vector gradients!
31
4.
32
33
34
35
5. Optimization: Gradient Descent
• We have a cost function 𝐽 𝜃 we want to minimize
• Gradient Descent is an algorithm to minimize 𝐽 𝜃
• Idea: for current value of 𝜃, calculate gradient of 𝐽 𝜃 , then take small step in direction
of negative gradient. Repeat.
Note: Our
objectives
may not
be convex
like this
36
Gradient Descent
• Update equation (in matrix notation):
• Algorithm:
37
Stochastic Gradient Descent
• Problem: 𝐽 𝜃 is a function of all windows in the corpus (potentially billions!)
• So is very expensive to compute
• You would wait a very long time before making a single update!
38
Lecture Plan
1. The course (10 mins)
2. Human language and word meaning (15 mins)
3. Word2vec introduction (15 mins)
4. Word2vec objective function gradients (25 mins)
5. Optimization basics (5 mins)
6. Looking at word vectors (10 mins or less)
• See Jupyter Notebook
39
40