Module 2
Module 2
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
History
There has long been a traditional, local system of resolving disputes.
Presidential Decree 1508 talks an unofficial "time-honored tradition of amicably
settling disputes among family and barangay members at the barangay level
without judicial resources.
Alfredo Flores Tadiar was the principal author of Presidential Decree 1508,
The Katarungang Pambarangay Law, and he also wrote its implementing rules,
requiring prior conciliation as a condition for judicial recourse. For 12 years (1980-
1992), he was a member of the Committee of Consultants, Bureau of Local
Government Supervision, which oversaw the nationwide operations of the
Katarungang Pambarangay Law. Under the decree, the body was known as Lupong
Tagapayapa. This decree was replaced by the Local Government Code of 1991.
The Katarungang Pambarangay share characteristics with similar traditional,
hybrid courts in other countries such as the Solomon Islands. Papua New Guinea,
Nigeria and South Africa, among, others. Such courts emerged during colonial
periods as Western imperial powers introduced western legal systems. The Western
legal systems were usually applied to westerners while the local dispute resolution
systems were integrated into the Western system in a variety of ways including
incorporation of local decision makers into the government in some way. After
independence, many states faced the same problems as their former rulers,
especially "limited geographical reach of state institutions, Western modeled
institutions often divorced from community structures and expectations, and
resource constraints in the justice sector. Hybrid courts became a "middle ground
for supporting community decision-making while simultaneously expanding the
authority and reach of the state." Besides hybrid courts, other authors have
described the system as a "Non-State Justice System".
1. Barangay
2. Barangay Captain
I. Essay
Conciliation
a. Pre-condition to Filing of Complaint in Court
No complaint, petition, action, or proceeding involving lupon shall be filed
or instituted directly of the or any other government office for adjudication,
unless there has been a confrontation between the parties before the lupon
chairman or the pangkat, and that no conciliation or settlement has been reached
as certified by the lupon secretary or pangkat secretary as attested to by the lupon
or pangkat chairman or unless the settlement has been repudiated by the parties
thereto.
b. Where Parties May Go Directly to Court
The parties may go directly to court in the following instances:
1. Where the accused is under detention;
2. Where a person has otherwise been deprived of personal liberty calling for
habeas corpus proceedings;
3. Where actions are coupled with provisional remedies such as preliminary
injunction, attachment, delivery of personal property and support pendente lite;
and
4. Where the action may otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations
c. Conciliation among members of indigenous Cultural Communities
The customs and traditions of indigenous cultural communities shall be
applied in settling disputes between members of the cultural communities.
Arbitration
The parties may, at any stage of the proceedings, agree in writing that they
shall abide by the arbitration award of the hipon chairman or the pangkat. Such
agreement to arbitrate may be repudiated within five (5) days from the date
thereof for the same grounds and in accordance with the procedure hereinafter
prescribed. The arbitration award shall be made after the lapse of the period for
repudiation and within ten (10) days thereafter.
The arbitration award shall be in writing in a or known When the parties to
the dism to the parties me e do not use language or dialect, the award shall be
written in the language or dialect known to them.
Exceptions on the Proceedings Open to the Public
All proceedings for settlement shall be public and informal Provided,
however, That the lupon chairman or the pangkat chairman, as the case may be,
may motu proprio or upon request of a party, exclude the public from the
proceedings in the interest of privacy, decency. or public morals.
Appearance of Parties in Person
In all katarungang pambarangay proceedings, the parties must appear in
person without the assistance of counsel or representative, except for minors and
incompetents who may be assisted by their next-of-kin who are not lawyers.
Effect of Amicable Settlement and Arbitration Award
The amicable settlement and arbitration award shall have the force and
effect of a final judgment of a court upon the expiration of ten (10) days from the
date thereof, unless repudiation of the settlement has been made or a petition to
nullify the award has been filed before the proper city or municipal court.
However, this provision shall not apply to court cases settled by the fupon
under the last paragraph of Section 408 of the Code, in which case the compromise
settlement agreed upon by the parties before the lupon chairman or the pangkat
chairman shall be submitted to the court and upon approval thereof, have the
force and effect of a judgment of said court.
Execution
The amicable settlement or arbitration award may be enforced by execution
by the lupon within six (6) months from the date of the settlement. After the lapse
of such time, the settlement may be enforced by action in the appropriate city or
municipal court.
Repudiation
Any party to the dispute may, within ten (10) days from the date of the
settlement, repudiate the same by filing with the lupon chairman a statement to
that effect sworn to before him, where the consent is vitiated by fraud, violence,
or intimidation. Such repudiation of the for filing a complaint as hereinabove
provided.
Transmittal of Settlement and Arbitration Award to the Court
The secretary of the lupon shall transmit the settlement or the arbitration
award to the appropriate city or municipal court within five (5) days from the date
of the award or from the lapse of the ten-day periodi repudiating the settlement
and shall furnish copies thereof to each of the parties to the settlement and the
lupon chairman.
Power to Administer Oaths
The punong barangay, as chairman of the lupong tagapamayapa, and the
members of the pangkat are hereby authorized to administer oaths in connection
with any matter relating to all proceedings in the implementation of the
katarungang pumbarangay.
Administration and Appropriations
The city or municipal mayor, as the case may be.. shall see to the efficient
effective implementation and administration of the katarungang pambarangay.
The Secretary of Justice shall promulgate the rules and regulations necessary to
implement this Chapter.
Such amount as may be necessary for the effective implementation of the
katarungang pambarangay shall be provided for in the annual budget of the city or
municipality concerned.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
I. Essay