TRENDS

A glance at the given bar chart reveals A glance at the given bar chart reveals
changes in the amount of rice produced changes in the amount of rice produced
yearly in four countries during a period of yearly in four countries during a period of
twenty years, from 1995 to 2015. twenty years, from 1995 to 2015.

Overall, what stands out from the graph Overall, what stands out from the graph is
is that while the figures for A and D that while the figures for countries A and D
witnessed upward trends, the opposite was witnessed upward trends, the opposite was
true for countries B and C. Another true for countries B and C. Another
noticeable thing is that countries A produced noticeable thing is that country A was the
rice the most productive over the period most productive regarding rice production
studied. over the period studied.

As can be seen from the chart, in 1995, nearly

As can be seen from the chart, in 1995, 45 million tonnes of rice was produced in
nearly 45 million tones of rice was produced country A. In the next ten years, this figure
in coutry A. In the next ten years, this figure kept rising slightly, reaching 50 million
kept rising slightly, reaching 50 million tonnes of rice being produced at the end of
tonnes of rice being produced at the end of the period. In terms of country B, in the initial
the period. In terms of country B, in the initial year, there was approximately 36 million
year, there was approximately 36 million
tonnes of rice being produced. The figure for tonnes of rice being produced. The figure for
B grew significantly to nearly 50 million B grew significantly to nearly 50 million
tonnes before experiencing a gradual drop to tonnes before experiencing a gradual drop to
above 40 million tonnes of rice in 2015. above 40 million tonnes of rice in 2015.

Regarding rice production of country Regarding rice production of country C, at the

C, at the first of the period, this figure started beginning of the period, this figure started
with roughly 5 million tonnes of rice with roughly 5 million tonnes of rice
produced, the rice production of country C produced, the rice production of country C
climbed steadily to 7 million tonnes in 2005 climbed steadily to 7 million tonnes in 2005
before witnessing a significant recovery to before witnessing a significant decline to
nearly 5 million tonnes at the end of the nearly 5 million tonnes at the end of the
period. As for country D, starting with only period. As for country D, starting with only
around 3 million tonnes of rice produced, this around 3 million tonnes of rice produced, this
figure remained almost unchanged in the next figure remained almost unchanged in the next
ten years before climbing slightly to 5 million ten years before climbing slightly to 5 million
tonnes, becoming the least productive tonnes, becoming the least productive
coutry’s rice production. country in terms of rice production.

A glance at the given line chart reveals A glance at the given line chart reveals
changes in the proportion of different age changes in the proportion of different age
groups of European people visiting gym at
least once a month during a period of twenty groups of European people visiting the gym
years, from 1990 to 2010. at least once a month during a period of
twenty years, from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph
is that all the figures witnessed upward trends Overall, what stands out from the graph is
over the period showed. Another noticeable that all the figures witnessed upward trends
thing is that the figure for people aged 18-24 over the period shown. Another noticeable
was the highest among them. thing is that the figure for people aged 18-24
was the highest among them.
As can be seen from the graph, in
1990, the figures for 18-24 year old and 25- As can be seen from the graph, in 1990, the
34 year old people started with the same figures for 18-24 year-olds and 25-34 year-
position, with around 8%. Those figures both olds started at the same position, with around
witnessed a marginal rise, reaching roughly 8%. Those figures both witnessed a marginal
30% in the next eight years. From 1998 rise, reaching roughly 30% in the next eight
onwards, the proportion of people of 25-34 years. From 1998 onwards, the proportion of
age group kept increasing considerably, people of the 25-34 age group kept
reaching 50% of the number of gymers in the increasing considerably, reaching 50% of the
final year; meanwhile, the figure for gymers number of gym-goers in the final year;
aged 18-24 soared to 60% in 2006, then meanwhile, the figure for gym-goers aged
dropped gradually to above 50% in the next 18-24 soared to 60% in 2006, then dropped
two years before experiencing a recovery to gradually to above 50% in the next two years
60% at the end of the period. before experiencing a recovery to 60% at the
Regarding the figures for 35-44 and end of the period.
over 45 year old people visiting gym,
similarly, those figures started with the same Regarding the figures for 35-44 and over 45
rate, at approximately 5% in the initial year. year-olds visiting the gym, similarly, those
The percentage of gymers aged 35-34 and figures started with the same percentage, at
over 45 kept growing significantly until the approximately 5% in the initial year. The
end of the period, with their respective figures percentage of gym-goers aged 35-44 and
were 40% and above 20%. over 45 kept growing significantly until the
end of the period, with their respective figures
at 40% and above 20%.

con xem thêm bài dưới đây và cải thiện cách diễn đạt nhé
vd: the figures for 18-24 year-olds and 25-34 year-olds started at the same position, with
around 8%.
-> both the 18-24 and 25-34 age groups started at a similar attendance rate of approximately
8%.
The provided line chart offers an insightful overview of the changes in gym attendance among
various age groups in Europe between 1990 and 2010.
Throughout this 20-year period, it is evident that all age groups experienced an upward trend in
their gym attendance rates. Of particular interest is the fact that the highest attendance rate was
observed among individuals aged 18-24.
Upon closer examination of the chart, it can be noted that in 1990, both the 18-24 and 25-34 age
groups started at a similar attendance rate of approximately 8%. Over the following eight years,
these rates experienced a modest increase, reaching around 30%. From 1998 onwards, the gym
attendance proportion for the 25-34 age group continued to rise significantly, ultimately
reaching 50% by the end of the period. In contrast, the attendance rate for the 18-24 age group
spiked to 60% in 2006, then gradually decreased to just above 50% in the subsequent two years,
before recovering to 60% by 2010.
With regard to the gym attendance rates of the 35-44 and 45+ age groups, both categories
commenced at the same percentage of approximately 5% in 1990. Throughout the duration of
the period, the percentage of gym attendees in the 35-44 and 45+ age groups continued to grow
markedly, reaching 40% and just above 20%, respectively, by 2010.