Lec 22
Lec 22
Announcements
Start reading Chapter 5.
Outline
A Brief History of X-rays
X-ray interactions with matter
Photoelectric Effect & Compton Effect
X-ray attenuation
X-ray contrast in tissue
Chest x-rays
Breast x-rays (mammography)
Contrast agents
His conclusions:
X-rays are not EM waves (incorrect!)
Dominated by particle rather than
wave behavior (correct)
Attenuation Coefficient
Projection X-Ray
Film shows intensity as negative
(dark areas, high x-ray detection)
Disadvantage:
No depth information
Advantages:
Inexpensive, simple
X-ray interactions with tissues described by:
(1) Photoelectric Effect (Photon Absorption)
(2) Compton Effect (Photon Scattering)
Photoelectric Effect (Absorption)
1 eV = 1.602 x 10-19 J
Chemical composition:
Atomic number (Z) = # protons, but also # electrons
Intensity of X-rays
Itrans = I0e- x
Problem (part b): How thick would lead shielding an x-ray lab wall
need to be to reduce intensity of 8.0 keV x-rays to 1% of original
value? At 8.0 keV: m = 232 cm2 g-1
*Shielding low energy x-rays is easy. It requires only thin lead foil
(18 m). Lead apron would give excellent shielding of these x-
rays. To shield higher energy x-rays requires thicker lead
shielding.
X-ray Image Contrast
Physical Contrast
Material Effective Atomic Density (
Number (Z) g/cm3)
Chest has high physical contrast Chest images are produced using
due to large difference in density of high x-ray energy. Beam is filtered
air in lungs and ribs (bone). with higher energies providing good
penetration and less exposure.
Breast has low physical contrast, with Low x-ray energies required
small differences in soft tissue density, or for breast, so that increased
low contrast of very small calcifications. absorption improves contrast.
(c) For thickness, x=0.1 cm. For 20 keV: 1 =0.5 cm-1 & 2 =0.76 cm-1