FR Compliance
FR Compliance
STUDY ON COMPLIANCE OF
ISBN : 978-93-90668-03-8
E-mail : [email protected]
Website : www.icai.org
Price : ` 350 /-
ISBN : 978-93-90668-03-8
vi
1
Introduction
The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), at its
226th meeting, held in July 2002, constituted the Financial Reporting Review
Board (FRRB) as its non-standing committee. Since then, the ICAI is
continuing with its efforts to improve financial reporting practice in the
country through Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB).
The Board reviews the general purpose financial statements of certain
enterprises and auditor‘s report thereon with a view to determine, to the
extent possible:
(i) Compliance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the
preparation and presentation of financial statements;
(ii) Compliance with the disclosure requirements prescribed by regulatory
bodies, statutes and rules and regulations relevant to the enterprise;
and
(iii) Compliance with the reporting obligations of the auditor.
The Board may take any of the following actions based of the review of the
financial statement with respect to:
(i) Auditors:
In case of material non-compliance, which affect the true & fair view of the
financial statements, such cases are referred to the Director (Discipline) of
the ICAI for initiating appropriate action against the auditor.
If the non-compliance is not of a material nature, the Board issues advisory
to the auditor to help/guide auditors towards best practices & transparency in
reporting of financial statements.
(It also informs Peer Review Board (PRB-ICAI) about the advisory letters
issued so that it may accordingly be considered during the Peer Review.)
(ii) Management of the Enterprises:
Informs irregularity to the regulatory body Ministry of Corporate Affairs
(MCA), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities and Exchange Board of India
(SEBI), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), Election
Commission of India (ECI) etc. relevant to the enterprise for appropriate
action.
In the last three council years, the Board has covered the review of the
financial statements of the entities pertaining to various sectors, whic h has
been summarized as follow -
The Board, as per its Term of Reference (TOR), also carries out the task of
spreading awareness amongst the members by conducting various seminars/
webinars, releasing the publication, articles in the Journal etc. To further
enhance its outreach among the preparers and auditors of financial
viii
statements, FRRB is also regularly publishing its observations on twitter
platform (https://twitter.com/frrbicai).
‘ ix
Deficiencies Observed: At a Glance
1.15%
1.15%
13.79%
8.05%
13.79%
2.30%
Summary of non-compliances : Ind AS wise
1.15%
2.30%
1.15%
2.30%
2.30%
5.75%
1.15%
6.90%
4.60%
6.90%
3.45%
3.45%
8.05%
1.15%
9.20%
x
Deficiency observed : Elements of
Financial Statements
9.85%
3.03%
25.76%
17.42%
3.79%
4.55%
6.06%
29.55%
‘ xi
Contents
Foreword ................................................................................................ iii
Preface................................................................................................... v
Introduction ........................................................................................... vii
Deficiencies : At a Glance ....................................................................... x
Auditor‘s Report
8 CARO Reporting under CARO 1 CARO, 2016 151
8 CARO Immovable Properties 2 CARO, 2016 152
8 CARO Loans Granted 3-5 Ind AS 109, 153
CARO 2016, SA
580
Companies
Act,2013
8 CARO Statutory Dues 6 CARO, 2016 160
8 CARO Undisputed Statutory Dues 7 CARO, 2016 161
Chapter no Chapter Topic addressed Observation nos. Reference Page no.
8 CARO Disputed Statutory Dues 8 CARO, 2016 162
8 CARO Contingent Liabilities 9 CARO, 2016 163
8 CARO Fraud 10 CARO, 2016 164
8 CARO Managerial Remuneration 11 CARO, 2016 164
8 CARO Preferential Placement of 12 CARO, 2016 166
Preference Shares and
Debentures
Chapter-1
Observations related to Assets
1. Property, Plant and Equipment
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
The accounting policy for Property, Plant and Equipment read as follows:
―Subsequent expenditure related to an item of PPE is added to its carrying
value only if it increases the future benefits from the existing asset beyond its
previously assessed standard of performance.‖
Observation:
It was viewed that as per paragraph 13 of Ind AS 16, subsequent expenditure
would be recognized in the carrying amount of PPE when that cost/ expense
would meet the recognition criteria given in paragraph 7 of Ind AS 16 i.e., it is
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to
the entity and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. There is no
criterion that capitalisation should be done only if there is increase of
future benefits from the existing asset beyond previously assessed
standard of performance‟.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the language of the stated policy is not in line
with the component accounting concepts given in Ind AS 16.
Observation:
It was noted from the notes to the accounts that although the details of
various items of property, plant and equipment have been disclosed by the
company by way of a note, however, no disclosures regarding movement in
the capital work-in-progress were given.
It was viewed that since the capital work in progress is also the part of
property, plant and equipment and therefore the amount of expenditures
2
Observations related to Assets
‘ 3
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was viewed from the stated accounting policy of a company that
depreciation on leasehold improvements is provided over the primary period
of lease or over the useful lives of the respective fixed assets, whichever is
shorter.
As per paragraph 56 of Ind AS 16, various factors are considered in
determining the useful life of an asset which, interalia, includes legal limits on
the use of asset such as the expiry dates of related asset. Accordingly, it was
viewed that for providing depreciation on leasehold improvement, lease
term should have been considered instead of considering primary
period of lease.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the stated accounting policy is not in line with
the above-stated requirement of Ind AS 16.
4
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was viewed from the note on Intangible Assets that asset ―Toll Equipment‖
has been classified under Intangible Assets. However, as per the note
regarding accounting policy on property, plant and equipment, it was noted
that depreciation on Toll Equipment is calculated on a WDV basis over useful
life of 7 years.
Considering the stated accounting policy on Property, Plant and Equipment
as well as the fact that ‗Toll Equipment‘ is a tangible asset, it was viewed that
classification of Toll Equipment under Intangible asset is not correct.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the given treatment is not in line with the
above-stated requirement of Ind AS 16.
‘ 5
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that all the project related expenses which have been incurred
prior to the date of commercial operations have been capitalised.
As per paragraph 20 of Ind AS 16, recognition of costs in the carrying
amount of PPE ceases when the item is in the location and condition
necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management. Hence capitalising expenses incurred upto the date of
commercial operations is not in line with Ind AS 16.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above-statement requirement of Ind AS
16 has not been complied with.
6
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted that the previous year figures have not been provided for all the
items of Property, plant and equipments which was not in line with the above
stated requirements of Schedule III to Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of Schedule III
to Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
‘ 7
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the stated accounting policy of the company that borrowing
costs directly attributable to the acquisition of fixed assets are capitalised. As
per paragraph 8 of Ind AS 23, borrowing costs that are directly attributable to
the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset shall be
capitalised.
In addition, it was noted that borrowing costs were capitalized which were
incurred upto the date the asset is put to use. As per paragraph 22 of Ind AS
23, borrowing costs should be capitalized till the asset is ready for its
intended use or sale. Hence, capitalization of expenses incurred upto the
date the asset is put to use is not in line with Ind AS 23.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of paragraph 8 & 22 of Ind
AS 23 have not been complied with.
8
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted that leasehold land has not been amortised. As per the
requirements of Ind AS 16, a depreciable asset should essentially have a
limited useful life. Leasehold land by its nature has a limited useful life and
as such, it should be amortised as required under paragraph 43 and 50 of
Ind AS 16.
It was noted that in the given case, the enterprise holds leasehold land,
however, its cost was not amortised. It was viewed that non-
amortisation of leasehold land is against the requirements of Ind AS 16.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 16 have not been
complied with.
9. Leasehold Land
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
An abstract of the note to the financial statements of a company reads as
follows:
―The lease term in respect of leasehold land is 97 years. The lease term in
respect of land acquired under finance lease is up to 97 years with ability to
opt for renewal of lease term on fulfillment of certain conditions.‖
‘ 9
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from footnote given under a note to the financial statements of a
company that the company has acquired a land under finance lease.
However, no accounting policy was disclosed for the same. In the absence
of accounting policy, principles, bases, conventions, rules and
practices applied by the company in preparing and presenting the
disclosures related to finance lease is not clear.
It was viewed that the accounting policy should have been disclosed for the
understanding of the users of the financial statements.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 8 have not been
complied with.
10
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted from the above stated abstract of policy on Property, Plan t and
Equipment that the company amortizes, in ten years, the assets which are
not owned by the company. It was noted that no disclosure was made in the
financial statements as to which are these assets that are not owned by the
company.
‘ 11
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
It was viewed that accounting policy are disclosed for each of the
material items disclosed in the financial statements, however, in the
given case, even though the policy has been disclosed for amortization
of assets not owned by the company, yet, no disclosure was made
regarding nature and details of such assets anywhere in the notes to
accounts. Further, the „basis for ten years period of amortisation‟ has
also not been disclosed.
Accordingly, it was viewed that appropriate disclosures have not been made
by the company with regards to ―Assets not owned by the company‖.
12
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted from the accounting policy of the company that the expenditure
on research and development is not being classified between research phase
and development phase.
As per Ind AS 38, the expenditure on research and development is classified
into the expenditure on research phase and development phase. As per
paragraph 54 of Ind AS 38, any expenditure on research phase should
be recognised as an expense immediately. Any expenditure on
development phase should be recognised as an intangible asset, if the
recognition criteria given in paragraph 57 of Ind AS 38 are satisfied.
Hence, it was viewed that accounting policy of the company was not in line
with Ind AS 38.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 38 have not been
complied with.
‘ 13
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the company had taken the deemed cost exemption as
permitted under paragraph D7AA of Ind AS 101 and taken the carrying value
14
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted that the company had leasehold land however; the accounting
policy related to the leasehold land was not disclosed by the Company .
It was further observed from note to the financial statements of the company
on Capital Work in Progress (CWIP) that the total CWIP was stated as ―Total
intangible assets under development‖. However, no policy was disclosed
or explanation was given regarding capitalisation of such internally
generated intangible assets.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 have not been
‘ 15
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
complied with.
16
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted that the company has investment properties but the depreciation
has not been charged on these properties during the reporting year.
It was viewed that as per the principles of Ind AS 40, an investment property
is measured initially at cost. Under the cost model, investment property is
measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated
impairment losses and Fair value is disclosed in notes to accounts.
Accordingly, depreciation should have been charged on these properties and
debited to Statement to Profit and Loss.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 40 have not been
complied with.
15. Investments
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In one company under the note to the financial statements on Investments
unquoted investments were disclosed.
While in the note to the financial statements of another company,
classification of investments was not made into quoted or unquoted
investments. Further, fixed deposits with banks having maturity period of
more than 12 months was classified as investments.
In another case, fixed deposits with banks having maturity period of more
than 12 months were classified as investments.
‘ 17
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from note to the financial statements on Investments that the
investments were classified as unquoted investments; however, as per the
above stated requirement of Schedule III, aggregate amount of unquoted
investments was not disclosed.
Further, it was noted from another note to the financial statements that the
investments were not classified into quoted or unquoted investments and
disclosures as required under Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 were
also not made.
Further, it was viewed that the fixed deposits with banks having maturity
period of more than 12 months should have been classified as other bank
balance under financial assets instead of investments.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II – Ind AS
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
18
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was observed from the note to the financial statements on Non-Current
Investments that the value of investments in equity shares of a company was
same as at the end of reporting year and previous year. However, the
number of shares in such investment held at the end of reporting year had
increased as compared to the number of shares in such investment held at
the end of previous year.
‘ 19
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Further, it was noted that the face value of shares in such investment was
Rs.10 per share as at the end of the reporting year as compared to its face
value of Rs. 5 per share as at the end of the previous year.
It was viewed that such investment increased in terms of number of
shares as well as in face value without any change in value of
investments and no explanatory note was provided for the same.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 have not been
complied with.
20
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted that under note regarding disclosure of Categories of Financial
Instruments, amount of Level 1: Listed Equity Investments and the amount of
Level 3: Unquoted equity instruments was made.
However, it was noted that the total of Financial Assets given under the
notes was less than the amount of total financial assets shown under
disclosure of Categories of Financial Instruments. This difference was due to
double counting of the amount of Unquoted Equity Shares in the total of
financial assets included under disclosure of Categories of Financial
Instruments.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the amount of Financial Assets as given
under note of Categories of Financial Instruments and in the Balance Sheet
was different which gives incorrect picture to the readers of the financial
statements.
‘ 21
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint
ventures have been disclosed separately from other than financial assets.
However, as per the above stated para of Guidance Note, it was viewed
that such investment may be shown under the head of financial assets
as a separate line item on the face of the Balance Sheet.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II – Ind AS
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
22
Observations related to Assets
‘ 23
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
rata share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation and are
classified as equity instruments in accordance with paragraphs 16C and
16D, or instruments that are contracts for the future receipt or delivery of
the entity‘s own equity instruments.‖
Observation:
It was noted that the interest accrued has been shown under ―non-financial
assets‖ whereas prepaid expenses and balances with revenue authorities
have been shown under ―Financial Assets‖ in the Financial Statements of the
company.
As per the requirements of paragraph 11 of Ind AS 32, it was viewed that
interest accrued is in the nature of financial asset and hence should be
disclosed under the head of non- financial assets.
Further, prepaid expenses and balances with revenue authorities are in the
nature of non-financial assets and hence it should be shown under the head
of non- financial assets.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II to the
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 and Ind AS 32 have not been
complied with.
Observation:
It was viewed that investment in shares of other companies are in nature
of financial assets and hence they should be shown under the head
„Financial Assets‟ and should have been accounted for accordingly.
It was viewed that due to incorrect disclosure of investment in shares,
inventories have been overstated and investments have been understated
which does not give true picture of financial position of the company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II to the
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 and Ind AS 32 have not been
complied in preparation and presentation of the financial statements.
‘ 25
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation
It was noted from the footnote under note to the financial statements on Non -
Current Financial Assets that the company had entered into a joint operation
with another company and has disclosed the details of arrangements and
share of assets. However, the company did not recognise the obligation
for liabilities, expenses and did not account for revenue pertaining to
its joint operations.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 111 have not
been complied with.
26
Observations related to Assets
Observation
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on Financial
Assets (Loans) that the loans were not classified as per the above
stated requirement specifying whether these loans were secured,
unsecured or doubtful. Further, the nature of other advances was also
not specified as the amount shown under this head was material,
consisting of 86% of total loans and advances.
‘ 27
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that ‗‘Receivable from Authority‖ and ―Toll Collection
Receivable‖ were disclosed under ―Financial Asset- Others‘‘.
It was viewed that ―Toll Collection Receivable‖ and ―Receivable from
Authority‖ is in respect of the amount due on account of services rendered in
the normal course of business and the company had an unconditional right to
these amounts of consideration. Accordingly, Receivable from Authority and
28
Observations related to Assets
Toll collection receivable were in the nature of trade receivables and should
have been classified as ‗‘Financial Assets -Trade Receivables‖ instead of
―Financial Asset – Others‖.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Guidance Note on
Division II - Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act 2013 have not been
complied with.
‘ 29
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from Related Party Disclosure, that Receivable from redeemable
preference share pertains to an enterprise controlled by the company and it
is a related party. However, under note to the financial statements on
Non-Current Loans, „Receivable from redeemable preference shares‟
were not classified as from related party, which is not in line with the
requirement of paragraph 8.1.10 of Guidance Note on Division II- Ind AS
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.
Further, it was noted that closing balance shown under ‗Non-Current Loans‘
as at the end of the year was different from the outstanding balance with
regard to same line item appearing under another note to the financial
statements on ‗Balance outstanding of Related Parties‘. However, the
balances of this line item in the previous years were same under both the
notes - ‗Non-Current Loans‘ and ‗Balance outstanding of Related Parties‘.
Accordingly, it was viewed that there is mismatch in closing balance of
receivable from redeemable preference shares as given under two
different notes in the same financial statements.
Further, it was noted that the Non-Cumulative Redeemable Preference
Shares have been recognized at amortized cost. However, interest received
on investments valued at amortised cost has not been shown
separately, which is not in line with the requirement of paragraph 20 of Ind
AS 107.
Further, it was viewed that the nature of line item “Receivable from
Redeemable Preference Shares” is not clear. For better understanding, it
should have been clearly stated.
Accordingly, it was viewed that requirements of Guidance Note on Division II -
Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 as well as Ind AS 107 have
not been complied with.
30
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted that the Company had designated three investments in equity
shares which were fair valued through OCI (FVTOCI). However, the reason
for using the FVTOCI alternative was not disclosed which is not in line with
the requirement of paragraph 11A(b) of Ind AS 107.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 107 have not
been complied with.
‘ 31
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the contradictory information has been disclosed regarding
nature of the relationship in respect of such investment in the same set of
financial statements.
It was further noted that the same entity, under Related party disclosure was
disclosed as fellow subsidiary as well as jointly controlled entity, both. It was
32
Observations related to Assets
‘ 33
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the above stated note to the financial statements that
certain balances pertaining to trade receivable, loan and advances, trade
payable and other liabilities were disclosed as subject to confirmation and
reconciliation.
It was viewed that information disclosed as above, is ambiguous. If such
balance confirmations/ reconciliations are not material and does not affect
the true and fair view of the financial statements of the company, then such
information shall not be disclosed in the financial statement as disclosure of
such facts may create doubts in the mind of readers of the financial
statements. However, on the other hand, if such balances are material and
do affect the true and fair view of the financial statements of the entity,
then the auditor should have adequately incorporated these facts in his
report by way of giving a modified opinion.
Further, it was viewed that as per paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 of SA 505, Externa l
Confirmation, the auditor shall maintain control over external confirmation
requests, and in case management refuses the auditor to send a
confirmation request, the auditor shall, interalia, perform alternative audit
procedures designed to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of SA 705 and SA 505 have
not been complied with.
34
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
The stated accounting policy did not disclose about the treatment of interest
income as to whether it presents interest income on financial assets
measured at FVTPL (Fair Value Through Profit and Loss) as a part of fair
value changes or such interest is presented separately.
It was viewed that the accounting policy as required under Ind AS 107 para
B5(e) has not been disclosed.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 107 have not
been complied with.
‘ 35
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that in the notes to the financial statements on Other Non-
Current Financial Assets, ‗interest receivable from related party‘ was
disclosed. Similarly, in the notes to the financial statements on Other Current
Assets,‗ advances to related party‘ were disclosed. However, it was noted
from the disclosure of related party transactions made in another note to the
financial statements that no cross-referencing of the interest receivable and
advances to related parties disclosed in respective notes was made by the
company.
It was viewed that for the ease of understanding of the users and better
presentation of the financial statement the cross referencing of the items of
assets and liabilities should be made with the relevant note for the related
party disclosures.
36
Observations related to Assets
Observation:
It was noted from note to the financial statements on Other Financial Assets
that dues from related parties were not classified into secured, unsecu red
and doubtful as per the above stated requirement of ‗General Instructions for
preparation of Balance Sheet‘ of Division II, Schedule III to the Companies
Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II, Schedule III to
the Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
‘ 37
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
32. Inventories
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
The value of finished goods as well as stock in trade were given under note
to the financial statements on ‗Inventories‘ and note to the financial
statements on ‗Changes in inventories of finished goods, work-in-progress‘
and the values were different in both these notes.
Observation:
It was noted that the value of finished goods as well as stock in trade as
given under note to the financial statements on ‗Inventories‘ and note to the
financial statements on ‗Changes in inventories of finished goods, work -in-
progress‘ were different although it was a compensating error.
It was viewed that information presented in Notes to Accounts was not
consistent and this type of inconsistency should be avoided.
38
Observations related to Assets
33. Inventories
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
The accounting policy for Inventories read as follows:
―Inventories are stated at lower of cost and fair value (except scrap / waste
which are valued at net realizable value) .....‖
Observation:
Paragraph 9 of Ind AS 2 required that inventories should be valued at lower
of cost and net realisable value. Paragraph 6 of Ind AS 2 gives definition of
net realizable value (NRV) and paragraph 9 of Ind AS 113 defines fair value.
The net realizable value is in nature different from the fair value of
inventories. The net realizable value is entity-specific value and may not be
similar to the fair value of the inventory as fair value is not entity -specific.
It was viewed that net realisable value of inventory refers to the net amount
(estimated selling price less estimated cost of completion and estimated cost
of sale) that an entity expects to realise from the sale of inventory in the
ordinary course of business whereas the fair value reflects the price at which
an orderly transaction to sell the same inventory in the principal (or most
advantageous) market for that inventory would take place between market
participants at the measurement date.
The inventories ought to be valued at lower of the cost or net realisable
value and not the fair value.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated policy on inventory valuation
is not in line with the requirements of Ind AS 2.
‘ 39
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that other bank balances were disclosed under the head of
‗Balance with Banks‘. However, the nature of these bank balances had not
been specified as per the above stated requirements.
Further, it was also noted that the amount was material; therefore, the nature
should have been disclosed appropriately for the understanding of the us ers
of the financial statements.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of General
Instructions for preparation of Balance Sheet of Division II – Ind AS Schedule
III to the Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
40
Chapter-2
Observations related to Equity
1. Treasury Shares
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
An abstract of the note to the financial statements of a company read as
follows:
―Beneficial Interest in a Trust represent investments in company‘s shares,
associates and other unlisted companies net off borrowings and liabilities
pertaining to investment division of a company transferred to the said trust in
terms of the scheme of amalgamation. Considering that the company‘s
shares are held by an independent trust and are meant for sale in terms of
the High Court order, the beneficial interest (including company‘s shares) has
been treated as financial asset and fair valuation as required in terms of Ind
AS 109 has been carried out by an independent firm of chartered accountant
and the resultant decrease in value thereof, has been adjusted from other
comprehensive income.‖
Observation:
It was noted that the company has beneficial interest in a Trust which
represents investments in company‘s own shares, associates and other
unlisted companies net off borrowings and liabilities. This beneficial interest
was treated as financial asset, and accordingly, fair valued as per Ind AS 109
by the company. The impact was taken to other comprehensive income.
It was viewed that effectively the beneficial interest in Trust which represents
investments in company‘s own shares, is nothing but ‗treasury shares‘, and
hence should not have been recognized as financial asset rather be
deducted from equity in line with the requirements of paragraph AG 36 of Ind
AS 32.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 32 have not been
complied with.
42
Observations related to Equity
Observation:
It was noted that the company, which is preparing financial statements as per
Ind AS, interalia, is required to prepare and present the Statement of
Changes in Equity.
However, in the abovementioned case, the Statement of Changes in Equity
was not prepared which is a mandatory requirement. Further, there was a
reference given in the auditor‘s report that the statement of changes in equity
has been audited by them although it was not forming part of the annual
report.
Accordingly, it was viewed that non-preparation of Statement of Changes in
Equity is a non-compliance of Section 2 (40) of Companies Act, 2013.
‘ 43
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
(i) …
Apart from the above items, Ind AS Schedule III states that:
• Re-measurement of defined benefit plans; and …
…Ind AS Schedule III requires ‗re-measurements of defined benefit
plans‘ during the reporting period to be shown as a separate line item in
other comprehensive income.
As per Ind AS Schedule III requirement mentioned above, such re-
measurements of defined benefit plans, when accumulated at the end of
every reporting period, shall be recognized as a part of retained earnings
with separate disclosure of such item along with the relevant amounts in
the Notes to Accounts. Accordingly, a company shall present the
accumulated re-measurements of defined benefit plans at the end of
each reporting period as a part of retained earnings.‖
Observation:
It was noted from note to the financial statements on ‗Other equity ‘that‗ Re-
measurement gains/(losses) on defined benefit plans‘ as adjusted/
recognized during the year were taken to OCI (Other comprehensive
income).
However, the accumulated re-measurements of defined benefit plans at the
end of each reporting period were not disclosed. Also, a reconciliation of ‗Re -
measurement gains (losses) on defined benefit plans‘ was not made, as per
the above stated requirement of the Guidance Note.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of Guidance
Note on Division II - Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act 2013 have not
been complied with.
4. Other Equity
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In the notes to the financial statements of a company on Other equity,
various reserves were disclosed like Capital Redemption Reserve, Securities
Premium, General Reserve and Retained Earnings.
44
Observations related to Equity
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on Other Equity that
there are various reserves with the company however; the nature and
purpose of these reserves were not disclosed by the company in the notes to
accounts.
As per the above stated requirements of Ind AS 1 and Guidance Note on
Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, the nature and
purpose of each reserve is required to be disclosed which was not given by
the company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 and the
Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
‘ 45
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
46
Observations related to Equity
Observation:
It was noted that in previous year, the opening balance of Authorised Share
Capital was Rs.55,000 Lakhs. During the previous year, an amount of Rs.
1,725 lakhs was added on account of amalgamation, and accordingly, the
closing balance of authorized share capital as at the end of the previous year
was Rs. 56,725 Lakhs. However, the opening balance of Authorised Share
Capital for current year was reported at Rs. 55,000 Lakhs and instead of
reporting at Rs. 56,725 Lakhs and same additions have been shown under
current year as well.
It was observed that movement shown in the authorized capital in the
previous year has again been shown in the current year, which is not correct.
‘ 47
Chapter-3
Observations related to Liabilities
1. Financial guarantees
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
The contingent liabilities of a company included letter of comfort to banks
against credit facilities / financial assistance availed by subsidiaries and
corporate guarantee given to banks against credit facilities/ financial
assistance availed by its associate company.
Observation:
In accordance with the above, it may be noted that a significant feature of a
letter of comfort and corporate guarantee contract is the contractual
obligation to make specified payment in case of default by the credit holder.
As such, the contract may not necessarily be called as financial guarantee
contract and it may take any name or legal form, however, the accounting will
be same as that of a financial guarantee contract. If a contract legally meets
these requirements, then it would be accounted for as the financial guarantee
contract as per Ind AS 109.
Accordingly, in the given case, it was viewed that both the letter of comfort
and corporate guarantee by their nature, are financial guarantees and
therefore, the same should have been recognized as financial guarantee as
per the requirement of Ind AS 109.
Similar view was taken by the ITFG, ICAI under issue 64 given in the
Compendium of ITFG Clarification Bulletins, December 2018 edition.
2. Corporate Guarantees
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
From the note to financial statements it was noted that the company had
given corporate guarantees to several banks in respect of funded and non-
funded limits availed by its foreign subsidiary and its associate company.
‘ 49
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
50
Observations related to Liabilities
Observation:
As per paragraph 8.2.5.1 of Guidance Note on Division II – Ind AS Schedule
III to the Companies Act, 2013, Other financial liabilities are required to be
presented as a separate line item on the face of the Balance Sheet under
‗Financial Liabilities‘. Items like financial guarantees meet the definition of
financial liabilities as per Ind AS 32 and should be presented under other
financial liabilities.
It was viewed that the aforesaid corporate guarantees were in the nature of
financial guarantees and as per the above stated requirements, such
corporate guarantees should have been recognized, measured, presented
and disclosed in line with the above stated requirements of Ind AS 109, Ind
AS 32 and Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 109, Ind AS 32,
as well as disclosure requirements given under paragraph 8.2.5.1 of
Guidance note on Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act,
2013 have not been complied with.
3. Non-Current Borrowings
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In the note to the financial statements of a company on Non-Current
Borrowings, Loans from related parties were classified as non-current. These
loans from related parties were interest free and repayment terms were not
stipulated.
‘ 51
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the notes to the financial statements on Non-Current
Borrowings that loans from related parties were classified as non-current. It
was viewed that since loans from related parties are interest free and
repayment terms have not been stipulated, such loans are callable on
demand. Accordingly, the classification of such loans as non-current
was not in line with the above stated requirements of Ind AS 1.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirement of Ind AS 1 has not been
complied with.
4. Financial Liabilities
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
Abstract of an accounting policy on Financial Assets and Liabilities read as
follows:
“Financial assets and liabilities
…
(v) Financial assets and liabilities at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss
(FVTPL)
Financial instruments which do not meet the criteria of amortised cost or fair
value through other comprehensive income are classified as fair value
through profit or loss.‖
52
Observations related to Liabilities
Paragraphs 4.2.2
―An entity may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a
financial liability as measured at fair value through profit or loss
when permitted by paragraph 4.3.5, or when doing so results in
more relevant information…‖
Observation:
It was viewed that the stated accounting policy gives an erroneous
impression that the financial instruments (including financial liabilities) can be
classified as either valued at Amortised Cost or Fair Value through Other
Comprehensive Income (FVOCI). However, the FVOCI classification
category is not available for Financial Liabilities under Ind AS 109.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 109 has not been
complied with in the stated policy.
5. Financial Liabilities
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In the note to the financial statements on Borrowings, various defaults in the
repayment of loans were given.
Further, under paragraph (viii) of Annexure to the Auditor‘s Report, the
auditor had reported that there has been delay in timely repayment of dues.
Further, he had reported the status of payment made for these defaults,
before the approval date of the financial statement.
‘ 53
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Paragraph 8.2.10
―The amounts shall be classified as:
(a) Current maturities of long-term debt;
(b) …
…
Current maturities of long-term debt
Ind AS Schedule III requires presenting ‗current maturities of long-term
debt‘ under ‗Other Financial Liabilities‘ grouped under ‗Current Liabilities‘.
Long term debt is specified in Ind AS Schedule III as a borrowing having
a period of more than twelve months at the time of origination. However,
current maturities of long-term debt are of the nature of a ‗Borrowings‘ but
since Ind AS Schedule III specifically provides a separate line item for
presenting current maturities of long-term debt under Other Financial
Liabilities, it is recommended that companies follow the presentation
requirements of Ind AS Schedule III.‖
Paragraph 18 of Ind AS 107 – Defaults and breaches
―For loans payable recognised at the end of the reporting period, an
entity shall disclose:
…
(c) whether the default was remedied, or the terms of the loans
payable were renegotiated, before the financial statements were
approved for issue.‖
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on Borrowings that
there were various defaults in the repayment of loans. Further, under
paragraph (viii) of Annexure to the Auditor‘s Report, the auditor had reported
that there has been delay in timely repayment of dues to banks for External
Commercial Borrowings (ECB) and to financial institutions for debentures. In
respect of working capital facilities from Banks there has been over drawings
in the accounts during the year as well as at year end. Under ‗Remark‘
54
Observations related to Liabilities
column, the auditor had reported the status of payment made for these
defaults, before the approval date of the financial statement.
It was viewed that the details of defaults remedied before the date of t he
financial statement was not disclosed, which is not in line with the
above stated requirements of paragraph 18 (c) of Ind AS 107 and
paragraph 8.2.3.16 of Guidance Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III
to the Companies Act, 2013.
It was further noted from the note on Borrowings that certain amount of ECB
was due in the next 12 months, however, no disclosure was given for current
maturities of long-term debts under current liabilities which is not in line with
the above stated requirement of paragraph 8.2.10 of Guidance Note on
Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 107 and Schedule
III to the Companies Act, 2013have not been complied with.
6. Financial Liabilities
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
Abstract of accounting policy of the company regarding Financial Guarantee
Contracts read as follows:
―Financial guarantee contracts other than those which are in the nature of
insurance are those contracts that require a payment to be made to
reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because the specified party fails to
make a payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debt
instruments. Financial guarantee contracts are recognised initially as a
liability at fair value, adjusted for transaction costs that are directly
attributable to the issuance of the guarantee. Subsequently, the liability is
measured at the higher of the amount of expected loss allowance determined
as per impairment requirements of Ind AS 109 and the amount recognized
less cumulative amortization. Corporate guarantees are in the nature of
insurance contracts.‖
‘ 55
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the corporate guarantees given by the company are in the
nature of insurance contracts. However, the given policy regarding Corporate
Guarantee omits to disclose about liquidity adequacy test. From the
information available in financial statements, it appeared that no liability
adequacy test was conducted. Accordingly, it was not found to be in line with
the requirement of paragraph 15 of Ind AS 104, Insurance Contracts.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 104 have not
been complied with.
56
Chapter-4
Observations Related to Components
of Statement of Profit & Loss
1. Revenue Recognition
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
Abstract of accounting policy of a company on Revenue recognition read as
follows:
―No element of financing is deemed present as the sales are made with a
credit term which is consistent with market practice.‖
Observation:
It was noted from the accounting policy of revenue that the element of
financing has not been considered if the credit term is consistent with market
practices.
As per above stated paragraph of Ind AS 181, it was viewed that when
consideration for sale of goods constitutes financing element, the fair
value is determined by discounting all future receipts using the imputed
rate of interest. Hence existence of financing component is determined
as per Ind AS 18 and not by comparing the market practices.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 18 have not been
complied with.
2. Revenue Recognition
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
Abstract note to the financial statements of a company read as follows:
―The company has sold Fully and Compulsorily Convertible Debenture
(FCCD) to a Trust along with encumbrances for which necessary approvals
need to be obtained……‖.
No investment was shown towards FCCD in the annual report of the
company.
No further disclosure was given in the financial statements of the company
regarding the encumbrances taken over.
1 Observations still relevant under Paragraph 61 read with paragraph 63 of Ind AS 115(Revenue from
contracts with Customers)
58
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from the notes to the financial statements that consideration
towards sale of FCCD was higher against the investment value. On perusal
of the annual report of the company, no additional investment was found
towards FCCD during the year. Hence, it indicated that the difference should
be an income, however, the same was not reflected in the Statement of Profit
and Loss as well as the notes to the financial statements. Further, it was
viewed that had the gain been recognised in the Statement of Profit and
Loss, the profit for the year would have increased significantly. Accordingly,
‘ 59
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
the profit was understated and hence, it was viewed that requirements of
paragraphs 15, 82 (aa) and 97 of Ind AS 1 are not complied with.
Further, it was also noted that adequate disclosure in respect of
encumbrances taken over were not provided.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 have not
been complied with in preparation and presentation of the financial
statements.
3. Revenue Recognition
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
The company had shown an interest income in its financial statements under
Exceptional Item. Such interest income was recognized during the reporting
year and the comparative year. The receivables corresponding to the same
amount were written off as not recoverable during the reporting year.
60
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from notes to the financial statements on exceptional item that
an interest income was recognized during the reporting year and the
comparative year. Further, the receivables corresponding to the same
amount were written off as not recoverable during the reporting year. As per
Ind AS 182 revenue should be recognized only when it is probable that the
economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity. The
measurement principle is guided by Ind AS 109.
Therefore, it was viewed that when the recoverability of interest income was
not certain, the recognition of the same during the reporting year should not
have been done, as per the recognition principle of Ind AS 18. Further, the
said principle was found to be neglected during the comparative year as well
and no Expected Credit Loss (ECL) was recognized in the previous year as
required by Para 5.5.1of Ind AS 109.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 18 and 109 have
not been complied with.
4. Revenue Recognition
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
One of the Company which is engaged in power generation, has disclosed
―contribution from consumers towards service lines‘‘ as ‗‘capital reserve‘‘
under ‗‘other equity‘‘.
Abstract of ‗sub note on ‗‘Other Equity‘‘ reads as follows:
―Based on expert opinion obtained, considering that capital contribution from
consumers toward service lines are not refundable to the consumers, even
after they cease to be consumers, and the underlying assets there against
being under ownership of the Company, such contributions are being treated
as capital reserve.‖
2Observation is still relevant under Paragraph 9(e ) read with definition of Income given under Appendix
of Ind AS 115 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers)
‘ 61
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that contribution from consumers towards service lines have
been treated as capital reserve instead of revenue.
As per paragraph 21 of Appendix C of Ind AS 18 3, it was viewed that the
entity shall recognise revenue at the amount of cash received from the
customers. Accordingly, the accounting treatment followed by the
company is incorrect.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirement of Ind AS 18 has not been
complied with.
3 Observation is still relevant under Paragraph 15 of Ind AS 115 (Revenue from Contracts with
Customers)
62
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted that purchase of traded power has been netted off from revenue
from traded power.
As per Paragraph 9.2 of Guidance Note on Division II - Ind AS Schedule
III to the Companies Act, 2013, it was viewed that there is no provision
for netting expenses from revenue. This kind of presentation is
available for „Other Non-operating income‟ as per the Guidance Note
and „when entity acts as an agent‟ as per Ind AS 18‟. Therefore, netting
off purchase of traded power against the income from traded power is
not correct.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated presentation by the
company has resulted in understatement of revenue and purchases of stock
in trade.
‘ 63
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
6. Interest Income
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
Abstract of accounting policy of a company on Interest income read as
follows:
―Interest income is recognized on time proportion basis taking into account
the amount outstanding and the applicable interest rates and is disclosed in
other income. Interest income earned in the course of the Merchanting Trade
undertaken by the company is classified under 'operating income' since the
underlying bank deposits are in-extricable linked with such trade and the
interest Income from such deposits are as much part of the margin from such
trade.‖
Observation:
It was noted from the stated accounting policy of interest income that the
effective interest rate method has not been applied. Paragraph 30 of Ind AS
4 Observation is still relevant under Appendix A read with Para B36 of Ind AS 115
64
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
185 required recognition of interest income using the effective interest rate
method as per the details in Ind AS 109 which was viewed as not being
applied by the company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 18 have not
been complied with.
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on ‗Revenue from
operations‘ that out of total ‗‘Other Operating Revenue‘‘, a substantial
amount was disclosed as ‗‘Others‘‘ for which no details were furnished. It
was viewed that nature of such „Other operating revenue‟ should have
been disclosed.
5Observation is still relevant under Paragraph 9(e) read with definition of income given under Appendix
of Ind AS 115 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers) and as per Ind AS 109
‘ 65
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
66
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted that under note to the financial statements on Other Expenses,
gain on foreign currency transaction has been deducted from other
expenses. It was viewed that since it is an income, it should be shown
under other income instead of deducting gain on foreign currency
transaction from other expenses.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 have not been
complied with.
‘ 67
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
a) Interest Income;
b) Dividend Income;
c) Other non-operating income (net of expenses directly attributable to
such income).
…Presentation and disclosure of ‗net gains (losses) on fair value
changes‘ should be made as below:
Net gains (losses) on fair value changes
Figures at Figures at
current previous
reporting reporting
period end period end
Investments classified at FVTPL
Investments designated at FVTPL
Derivatives at FVTPL
Other Financial Instruments
classified as FVTPL
Other Financial Instruments
designated at FVTPL
Reclassification adjustments
Realised gain on debt investments
classified as FVOCI
Observation:
It was noted that the Company did not disclose gain on fair valuation of
derivatives as from instruments categorized as FVTPL.
It was viewed that “gain on fair valuation of derivatives‟‟ should be
explicitly disclosed as “gain on fair valuation of derivatives at FVTPL‟‟
68
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
‘ 69
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that interest expense has been netted off with interest income. It
was viewed that considering the provision stated under Ind AS 1, Ind AS 107
and Guidance Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act,
2013 interest expense should not have been netted off against the inte rest
income.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 107, Ind AS
1 and Guidance Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the
Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
70
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
FDRs, which stands included under interest expense. The company has not
issued debentures.‖
Observation:
It was noted from CARO report of the company that deduction of interest on
pre-maturity of fixed deposits was included in the finance cost. It was viewed
that the deduction of interest income on prematurity of fixed deposits
should not have been accounted as finance cost rather the interest
income should not be recognized to the extent of the deduction.
It was viewed that interest income on fixed deposits should have been shown
under other income or other operating income based on the related facts of
the entity.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of Guidance
Note on Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have
not been complied with in preparation and presentation of the financial
statements.
‘ 71
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the Statement of Profit and Loss that expenses
includes the head “Administrative Expenses”. Accordingly, it was
observed that the company has classified the expenses based on
functional classification instead of nature-wise classification as
required by paragraph 99 of Ind AS 1.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 has not been
complied with.
Principle: Part II, Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies
Act, 2013 and Guidance Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to
the Companies Act, 2013
REVENUE
Revenue from operations
Other Income
Total Revenue
72
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
EXPENSES
Cost of Material Consumed
Purchases of Stock in Trade and Raw Material
Changes in Inventories of Finished goods and Stock-in-trade
….‖
Paragraph 9.5.1 of Guidance Note on Division II-Ind AS Schedule III To
The Companies Act, 2013:
“Cost of materials consumed
This disclosure is applicable for manufacturing companies. Materials
consumed would consist of raw materials, packing materials (where
classified by the company as raw materials) and other materials such as
purchased intermediates and components which are ‗consumed‘ in the
manufacturing activities of the company.”
Observation:
It was noted from note to the financial statements on ‗Purchase of Stock in
Trade and Raw Material‘ that the company is engaged in the business of
trading of certain goods and it has its own manufacturing facility. However,
in the Statement of Profit and Loss, the cost of material consumed has
not been disclosed separately instead it has been clubbed under
„Purchases of Stock in Trade and Raw Material‟ and „Changes in
Inventories of Finished goods and Stock-in-trade‟.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of Guidance
Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have not
been complied with.
14. Purchases
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
From the accounting policy of Revenue Recognition, it was noted that the
accounting policy of purchases has been disclosed thereat.
‘ 73
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was viewed that the purpose and relevance of disclosure of policy on
„Purchases‟ under the head of Revenue Recognition is not clear. Also
there is no such requirement under Ind AS 18 as well.
Accordingly, it was viewed that policy for Purchases under Revenue
Recognition is not correct.
74
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted that the excise duty expense was presented under the head
„Other Expenses‟. Considering paragraph 9.1.4 read with Illustrative
Format given under Annexure F of the Guidance Note, it was viewed
that excised duty paid should have been disclosed on the face of
Statement of Profit and Loss under the head „Expenses‟ as a separate
line item.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of Guidance
Note on Division II - Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have
not been complied with.
‘ 75
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the accounting policy of the company on employee benefits
that under defined contribution plans such as provident fund, the company
has an obligation to make good the shortfall, if any.
As per the definition of defined contribution plans, it was viewed that
employer‘s liability to the employee is limited to the amount of contribution &
has no further obligation to pay beyond agreed contribution. Further, as per
the definition of defined benefit plans, it was viewed that employer‘s liability
to the employee is not limited to the amount of contribution and may extend
further to pay beyond agreed contribution.
Accordingly, it was viewed that if the company has an obligation to
make good any shortfall, the said plan cannot be considered as defined
contribution plan as per Ind AS 19.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 19 have not been
complied with in preparation and presentation of the financial statements.
76
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
company and carried as a liability, to be paid out of the regular cash flows of
the company. The provision is made in respect of every employee who has
completed at least five years of service, as 15 days‘ salary for every
completed year of service. The present value of the obligation is based on
actuarial valuation report‖
‘ 77
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the footnote that provision for gratuity has been made only
in respect of those employees who have completed at least five years of
service as 15 days‘ salary for every year completed year of service.
However, the liability arises when the employee has started providing the
services.
As per the requirements of Ind AS 19, provision for gratuity should be
made for all employees irrespective of whether they have completed at
least five years of service or not. The company has not made any
provision for gratuity for those employees who have not completed at
least five years of service which is incorrect.
Further, the disclosures as required under Paragraph 135 of Ind AS 19
have not been disclosed in respect of the same.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 19 have not been
complied in preparation and presentation of the financial statements.
78
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from the accounting policy on VRS that expense on VRS is
charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss as incurred.
As per the requirements of Ind AS 19, it was viewed that these
expenses should be recognised when the entity can no longer withdraw
the offer of those benefits or when the entity recognises costs for a
restructuring that is within the scope of Ind AS 37, Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, and involves the payment
of termination benefits, whichever is earlier.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 19 and Ind AS 37
effective have not been complied with in preparation and presentation of the
financial statements.
‘ 79
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that although certain disclosures were given with regard to
employee benefits, however, expected contribution to the defined benefit
plan for the next financial year has not been disclosed as required by
paragraph 147 of Ind AS 19.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirement of Ind AS 19 has not been
complied with.
80
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was viewed that the disclosure of mortality rate constitutes a part of
the actuarial assumptions, however, the same has not been given,
which is required to be disclosed as per paragraph 147 read with para
57 (a) (i) of Ind AS 19.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 19 have not been
complied with.
‘ 81
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on Gratuity and Other
Post-Employment benefits plans that heading was mentioned as ―Amounts
for the Current and previous four period‖ whereas disclosure was made
only for current and previous year.
82
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was observed that the company has not accounted for any borrowing cost
(whether expensed or capitalised) in current year as well as in previous year.
In such case, there may be two possibilities:
‘ 83
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
84
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from the note on trade receivables that the trade receivables
have been shown as doubtful. It was viewed that when trade receivables are
shown as doubtful, the company shall disclose the amount of credit loss that
is expected on those receivables.
As per Ind AS 109, the company is required to recognize a loss
allowance (i.e. Impairment) for expected credit losses on financial
assets including trade receivables. Loss allowance is presented as
separate line item as deduction from gross carrying amount of trade
receivable. It was noted that the provision for expected credit loss has not
been created for doubtful trade receivables.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II to the
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 as well as Ind AS 109 have not
been complied with.
24. Depreciation
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
Abstract of accounting policy of a company on Depreciation of Property,
Plant and Equipment read as follows:
―Depreciation on property, plant & equipment (PPE) is provided on Straight
Line Method over their useful lives and in the manner specified in Schedule II
to the Companies Act, 2013. However, in respect of certain Plant &
Machineries and Electric Installations, depreciation is provided as per
their useful lives assessed on the basis of technical evaluation by the
external valuer, ranging from 20 to 40 years.‖
‘ 85
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the stated policy on depreciation of Property, Plant and
Equipment (PPE) that although the company has used the useful lives given
under Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013 for the purpose of charging
depreciation on PPE, however, in respect of certain plant & machineries and
electric installations, the useful lives as determined by external valuer have
been used.
As per the requirements of Schedule II to the Companies Act, 2013, it was
viewed that when different useful lives have been used by the company for
the purpose of charging deprecation on PPEs, such useful lives shall be
specifically disclosed by the company by way of notes to the accounts.
In the above stated disclosure, the company has stated that useful lives
range from 20 years to 40 years. It was viewed that proper disclosures
regarding the useful lives of plant & machineries and electrical
installations should have been made identifying the items of plant &
machineries and electrical installations with their respective us eful
lives as estimated by the external valuer.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Schedule II regarding
disclosure of useful lives have not been complied with.
86
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
‘ 87
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the financial statements that no disclosure was made about
the CSR activities. It was viewed that neither the amount spent as per the
above stated requirements nor other details as required under Paragraph
11.5 of Guidance Note of Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies
Act, 2013 were disclosed.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of
General Instructions for preparation of Statement of Profit and Loss of
Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 read with
Paragraph 11.5 of Guidance Note of Division II – Ind AS Schedule III to
the Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with in preparation
and presentation of the financial statements.
88
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted that the accounting policy erroneously mentions that both
deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to temporary
differences and unused tax losses.
As per the definitions of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities given
under Ind AS 12, it was noted that deferred tax liabilities are recognised for
taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised for:
(a) deductible temporary differences;
(b) the carry forward of unused tax losses; and
(c) the carry forward of unused tax credits.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the stated policy of the company is not
in line with requirements of Ind AS 12.
‘ 89
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
no tax impact was shown in the statement of profit and loss in respect of
such re-measurement of defined benefits plans under OCI.
Observation:
As per the requirements of paragraph 61A of Ind AS 12, current tax and
deferred tax, relating to items that are recognized in other
comprehensive income, shall be recognized in other comprehensive
income. In other words, as re-measurement of defined benefit plans has
been recognized in other comprehensive income and are not reclassified to
profit or loss in subsequent periods, therefore, its tax impact should also b e
disclosed under the same head i.e., OCI.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 12 have not been
complied with.
90
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from the adopted policy on business combinations that the
acquisition related costs are generally recognized in statement of profit or
loss as incurred.
As per paragraph 53 of Ind AS 103, it was viewed that the acquirer shall
account for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in
which the costs are incurred and the services are received.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the wordings generally should not have
been used.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the adopted policy is not in line with the
requirements of Ind AS 103.
‘ 91
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the Exchange rate difference realised was deducted from
the head ‗Revenue from Operations‘. It was viewed that being an expense
item, loss on exchange rate difference should have been shown under the
head ‗Other expenses‘ instead of reducing it from revenue.
92
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
It was further noted that in previous year, there was income from exchange
difference realized and the same was presented under the head ‗Sale of
products‘ as Revenue from Operations. It was viewed that the same should
have been classified under the head ‗Other income‘ instead of ‗Revenue from
Operation‘.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of
Guidance Note on Division II - Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act,
2013 have not been complied with.
Observation:
It was noted from the stated accounting policy that the exchange difference
on monetary items related to foreign operations are initially recognised in
OCI and reclassified from equity to Statement of Profit and Loss on
repayment of monetary items.
‘ 93
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the stated policy on Sale of Securities that company was
still following the requirements of Accounting Standard 11 notified under
Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 to recognize foreign
exchange contracts and hedging contracts. It was viewed that company
should have followed the hedge accounting principles of Chapter 6
94
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
‘ 95
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that ‗Fair value changes of investments designated as FVTPL‘
was disclosed as a constituent of ‗Other income‘.
It was viewed that it should have been disclosed under the sub-head
„Non-Operating Income‟ as per the above stated requirement of
paragraph 9.2 of Guidance Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the
Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the above stated requirements of Guidance
Note on Division II- Ind AS Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have not
been complied with.
96
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from the stated policy that any gain/ loss from trading in
derivatives was recognized only upto settlement. Any gain/ loss on MTM
(Marked to market) transactions was also not charged to the Statement of
Profit and loss.
As per the requirements of Ind AS 109, all derivatives, other than those
parts of hedging, which do not meet the criteria for classification as
subsequently measured at Amortised Cost or Fair Value through Other
Comprehensive Income (FVOCI) are measured at fair value at each
reporting date and all gains and losses are recognised in the Statement
of Profit or Loss.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the stated policy of the company is not in line
with Ind AS 109.
‘ 97
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
98
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on Exceptional items
that following items were disclosed as exceptional items by the company:
─ foreign currency gain / loss;
─ recoverable written off;
─ interest receivable written off etc.
It was further noted that the amount of above items was not material.
It was viewed that, as per the above stated requirement of the Guidance
Note on Schedule III (Division – II), in order to categorize an item of income
or expense as exceptional item and disclose as such in the financial
statement, size as well as the nature of such item should be considered.
It was further noted that the question number 32 of Educational Material on
Ind AS 1 issued by the ICAI, also addresses the issues on exceptional items.
In light of the above, it was viewed that, in the given case, none of the
items disclosed under the note on Exceptional items qualifies to be
reported as exceptional item considering the size and nature of given
items.
‘ 99
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
The following observations were noted from the note to the financial
statements on Earnings Per Share (EPS):
1. Number of shares that were issued during the year were considered as
the weighted average number of shares while calculating the EPS and
not the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during
the period. Hence, the calculation of EPS was incorrect.
2. Net profit after tax was considered for the calculation of EPS. However,
as per the requirements of paragraph 10 of Ind AS 33, profit attri butable
to ordinary equity holders shall be considered for the calculation of EPS.
100
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
In the given case, net profit after tax including impact of OCI, was
divided by number of shares issued during the year. Both numerator as
well as denominator used for EPS calculation was incorrect.
3. Further, the disclosures as required under paragraph 70 (a) and (b) of
Ind AS 33 were also not given in the notes to the financial statements.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 33 have not
been complied with.
‘ 101
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
with equal per share are before tax or after tax. If a component of the
statement of profit and loss is used that is not reported as a line item in
the statement of profit and loss, a reconciliation shall be provided
between the component used and a line item that is reported in the
statement of profit and loss.‖
Observation:
It was noted that the company has disclosed two Earnings Per Share (EPS)
i.e. including Regulatory income (expense) and excluding Regulatory income
(expense). It was observed that EPS [including Regulatory income
(expense)] was computed by using numerator after considering Other
Comprehensive Income. It was viewed that other comprehensive income
should not be included while computing EPS.
EPS excluding Regulatory income (expense) was computed by using a
numerator which is not a line item in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Accordingly, as per the above stated paragraph 73 of Ind AS 33, a
reconciliation statement should have been given, but such reconciliation
statement was not given by the company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirement of Ind AS 33 has not
been complied with.
102
Observations Related to Components of Statement of Profit & Loss
Observation:
It was noted that the Prior period items have been disclosed under th e head
of ‗Other expenses‘. It was viewed that as per Ind AS, prior period items
should be adjusted either by restating the comparative amounts for the
period in which error occurred or restating the opening balances of assets,
liabilities and equity for the earliest prior period presented.
‘ 103
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
In given case, it was viewed that the company has not corrected the
prior period errors retrospectively in its first set of Ind AS financial
statements. Further, the disclosures as required under paragraph 49
have also not been made by the company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 8 have not been
complied with.
104
Chapter-5
Observations related to Statement of
Cash Flows
1. Increase in Trade Receivable
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In the cash flow statement of a company, certain amount was reported as a
change in working capital due to ―increase in trade receivables‖. The
difference between the outstanding balances of trade receivables, shown in
the note to the financial statements of the company on Trade Receivables,
as at the end of the current year and previous year showed an amount
different from what was reported in the cash flow statement.
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements of the company on
Trade Receivables that there is an increase in trade receivables while
comparing the outstanding balance as at the end of the previous year and
the current year. However, in the Cash Flow Statement of the company,
reported amount of „increase in trade receivables‟ did not match with
the figures reported under the note of Trade Receivable. It was viewed
that the difference in amounts reported raises doubt on correctness of Cash
Flow Statement of the company.
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from notes to the financial statements of a company on ‗Non-
Current Borrowings‘ and ‗Other Current Financial Liabilities‘ that balances of
‗External Commercial Borrowings‘ shown under both Non-current borrowings
and Other current financial liabilities reduced from previous year to current
year. As per the notes, the reduction indicated repayment during the year.
However, in the Cash Flow Statement under the head ‗Cash Flow from
Financing Activities‘, the amount of repayments of External Commercial
Borrowings reported was different from what should have been done as
compared to the reduction disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
It was viewed that if the difference in the amounts reported in the cash
flow statement and what should have been reported as per the notes to
the financial statements were due to any repayment in a mode other
than cash then the same should have been disclosed separately as
required in paragraph 43 of Ind AS 7 but no such disclosure was made.
106
Observations related to Statement of Cash Flows
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 7 have not been
complied with.
3. Taxes on Income
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In the Statement of Profit and Loss of a company, income tax expense
relating to current year and tax adjusted for earlier years was shown. Exact
amount was disclosed by the company as income tax paid in its cash flow
statement.
Observation:
It was noted that the income tax expense as disclosed under Statement of
Profit and Loss was same as disclosed in cash flow statement as income tax
paid.
‘ 107
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the Cash Flow Statement that the net cash flow from
operating activities was derived by adjusting profit or loss for the effects of
108
Observations related to Statement of Cash Flows
‘ 109
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that re-measurement of the defined benefit plan has been
deducted under ‗‘Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)‘‘.
It was further noted that under Cash Flow Statement, the net profit before
tax has been used to derive cash flow from operating activities,
however, „‟re-measurement of the defined benefit plan‟‟ has been
adjusted here. It was viewed that since it is part of OCI, so it should not
be adjusted to the net profit before tax while calculating the cash flow
from operating activities.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirement of Ind AS 7 has not been
complied with.
110
Observations related to Statement of Cash Flows
Observation:
It was noted that under note to the financial statements on Other Expenses,
amount of Net gain on foreign currency transactions reported (deducted) was
different from the amount of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation (Net) adjusted in
the Cash Flow Statement under the heading of Cash flows from Operating
Activities.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the figures of items should be same
across the financial statements, else it would be construed as a non-
compliance under Ind AS 1.
‘ 111
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
112
Observations related to Statement of Cash Flows
Observation:
Following discrepancies were observed relating to the statement of Cash
Flow:
a) There was no depreciation debited to Statement of Profit and Loss,
however, the same was erroneously adjusted in cash flow statement.
b) The fair value adjustment on interest free ICD received from holding
company were shown under cash flow from financing activities as
repayment.
c) The proceeds from long term borrowings – Financial institution which
was shown under cash flow from financing activities was contrary to its
presentation under note on the Financial liabilities where it was classified
as short-term borrowing. Thus, contrary information was provided in the
financial statements.
d) The Company did not disclose changes in the financing activities arising
from cash and non-cash changes as required by paragraph 44 A to 44E
of Ind AS 7.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 7 have not
been complied with.
8. Capital Expenditure
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
In the cash flow statement of a company, a cash outflow was reported as
‗capital expenditure‘ under Cash Flows from Investing Activities.
‘ 113
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the cash flow statement that a cash outflow has been
reported as ‗capital expenditure‘. The capital expenditure was on account of
cash paid to acquire property, plant and equipment. It was viewed that such
cash outflow should have been reported using the proper description of
the line item viz. „acquisition of property, plant and equipment‟ rather
than as „capital expenditure‟ in line with the above mentioned requirements
of paragraph 16(a) of Ind AS 7.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the description given while presenting the
cash outflow on acquisition of property, plant and equipment was no t in line
with the above-stated requirement of Ind AS 7.
114
Chapter-6
Observations related to Other
Disclosures
1. Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements
Matter contained in the Financial Statements
The Abstract of an accounting policy on the basis of preparation of the
financial statements read as follows:
―…
ii) The Financial Statements have been prepared on a historical cost
basis, except the following:
Certain financial liabilities that are measured at fair value,
Defined benefits plans- plant assets measured at fair value.‖
Observation:
It was noted from the disclosure given under basis of preparation that in
exception to historical cost basis, it was stated that certain financial liabilities
are measured at fair value. However, it was noted from the disclosure
regarding financial instruments by category, that all financial liabilities have
been measured at amortised cost. It was further noted that certain financial
assets viz. equity instruments and mutual funds have been measured at fair
value.
Accordingly, it was viewed that accounting policy on “Basis of
Preparation” should have been stated correctly.
116
Observations related to Other Disclosures
‘ 117
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the notes to the financial statements that while describing
the applicability and disclosure requirements of Ind AS 108, Operating
Segment and Ind AS 19, Employee Benefits, respectively, a reference has
been made to Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006.
It was viewed that in the given case the applicable rules on the company are
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendment) Rules, 2016. It was
viewed that the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 are not
applicable on company and therefore, their reference in the given notes
is incorrect.
118
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
It was noted from the financial statements of the company that the
accounting policies of impairment of assets and segment reporting, being
significant accounting policies, have not been disclosed.
It was noted from note to the financial statements regarding mining
disclosures that the company‘s mining operation was suspended. It was
viewed that the management was required to make judgment whether it is
discontinued operation of major component of an entity as per Ind AS 105 or
there is indication about the impairment of assets as per Ind AS 38.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the accounting policy of the same should
have been disclosed. With regard to segment reporting, it was noted that the
company is in diversified business. Accordingly, the accounting policy for the
same is also significant.
Both accounting policies have been considered as significant
accounting policies which are relevant to the understanding of the
financial statements and hence, should have been disclosed as per the
above stated requirements of Ind AS 1.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 1 have not been
complied with.
‘ 119
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the Ind AS Adjustments reconciliation of Indian GAAP Vs
Ind AS were not given for all the items reported in Balance Sheet, which is
not in line with the requirements of paragraph 25 of Ind AS 101.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 101 have not
been appropriately complied with.
120
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
It was noted that although the explanatory note for reconciliation as per
previous GAAP and the Ind AS by disclosing gain on fair value was given.
However, these explanatory notes are silent as to how the transition
from previous GAAP to Ind AS affected the reported Balance Sheet,
financial performance and cash flows which was also required as per
the above stated requirement.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 101 have not
been appropriately complied with.
‘ 121
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that a subsidiary company had received borrowings from
financial institutions but the details and terms of the borrowings were not
available in the financial statements of that subsidiary company. Further,
financial statements of the holding company were referred for additional
details.
As per the financial statements of holding company, it was noted that holding
company had issued corporate guarantees as a security for loan availed by
the subsidiary company from financial institutions.
However, neither the guarantee commission was recognised as per Ind
AS 109 nor the disclosures required by Ind AS 24 were made in the
financial statements of subsidiary company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 24 read with Ind
AS 109 have not been complied with by the subsidiary company.
122
Observations related to Other Disclosures
‘ 123
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was viewed that expense on account of waiver of an interest receivable is
a bad debt. As the expense pertains to a related party, it requires
disclosure under Related Party Disclosure as per paragraph 18 (d) of
Ind AS 24. However, under related party disclosure, no disclosure was
given in this regard.
Further, an item can be classified as an exceptional item only if the
criteria mentioned in paragraphs 97 and 98 of Ind AS 1 has been met.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 24 have not been
complied with.
124
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
It was noted from the note to the financial statements on ‗Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments‘ that the company had given a corporate
guarantee to bank for credit facility availed by its subsidiary company.
It was observed that the amount of corporate guarantee was2.63 times
of previous year‟s net worth of the parent company. However, the
company did not disclose the purpose for which guarantee is proposed to be
utilised by the recipient of the guarantee, which was not in line with the
above stated requirement of the Companies Act, 2013.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Companies Act,
2013 have not been complied with.
‘ 125
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
9. Contingent Liabilities
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report and Financial
Statements
In the note to the financial statements on Contingent Liabilities, corporate
guarantees, in the nature of counter guarantees, which were issued to banks
and financial institutions were disclosed.
Observation:
It was noted from note to the financial statements on Contingent Liabilities
that corporate guarantees, in the nature of counter-guarantees‖ issued to
banks and financial institutions were disclosed, however, it was observed
from the aforesaid requirement that such "counter-guarantee" is not really a
guarantee at all, but is an undertaking to perform what is in any event the
obligation of the company. Hence, such performance guarantees and counter
guarantees should not have been disclosed as contingent liabilities.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Division II,
Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
126
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
It was noted from accounting policy for segment reporting and notes to the
financial statements on Segment disclosures that the company has identified
business segment as primary segment which was required in Indian GAAP
(AS 17. Also, the segment disclosure is given as per Indian GAAP (AS 17)
and these are not in line with the requirement of Ind AS 108.
It was viewed that as per the above stated requirements of Ind AS 108, the
company needs to identify operating segments and report information for
each operating segment.
‘ 127
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
128
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Paragraph 22
―An entity shall disclose the following general information:
a) factors used to identify the entity‘s reportable segments, including
the basis of organisation (for example, whether management has
chosen to organise the entity around differences in products and
services, geographical areas, regulatory environments, or a
combination of factors and whether operating segments have been
aggregated);
aa) the judgements made by management in applying the
aggregation criteria in paragraph 12. This includes a brief
description of the operating segments that have been
aggregated in this way and the economic 237 indicators that
have been assessed in determining that the aggregated
operating segments share similar economic characteristics;
and
b) types of products and services from which each reportable
segment derives its revenues.‖
Observation:
It was noted that while giving disclosure for segment reporting the
information required under paragraph 20 read with paragraph 21(a) and 22 of
Ind AS 108 has not been given.
It was viewed that sufficient disclosures should have been made by the
company in order to enable the users of the financial statement understand
and evaluate the nature and financial effect of activities carried out by the
company in various segments. In other words, adequate disclosures of
factors used to identify the reportable segment, judgments made by the
managements in applying aggregation criteria etc. should have been
clearly made by the company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 108 have not
been complied with.
‘ 129
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that although the company is engaged in the single reporting
segment but paragraph 32 of Ind AS 108 is applicable on single segment
entities also, however, the required disclosures were not given by the
Company.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 108 have not
been complied with.
130
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
In the note on Operating Segments it was stated that the Company does not
meet the quantitative threshold as mentioned in Ind AS 108 and hence
separate disclosure is not required. However, it was observed that the
quantitative threshold is not the only criteria, rather three
characteristics as described in paragraph 5 of Ind AS 108 should be
considered to identify operating segments.
‘ 131
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
132
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
It was noted that while giving disclosures for the segment revenue, segment
result, segment assets and segment liabilities, the following details were
omitted:
1. Reconciliations of the totals of segment revenues, reported segment
profit or loss, segment assets, segment liabilities and other material
segment items to corresponding entity amounts.
2. Reconciliations of the amounts in the balance sheet for reportable
segments to the amounts in the entity‘s balance sheet are required for
each date at which a balance sheet is presented.
Further, it was also noted from footnote given under note on Segment
Information that the merchandise trading segment facilitates the securities
trading segment. However, it was viewed that the trading segment and
securities segment were separate segments and segment results, assets and
liabilities of both segments should be separable at least to the extent of
revenue and therefore, should have been disclosed accordingly.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 108 have not
been complied with.
‘ 133
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
As per paragraph 93 (d) of Ind AS 113, the information about the valuation
technique and the inputs used for the fair value measurement are
required to be disclosed but the same was not found to be disclosed.
Therefore, the disclosure was not found to be in line with the requirement of
paragraph 93 (d) of Ind AS 113.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirement of Ind AS 113 has not been
complied with.
134
Observations related to Other Disclosures
‘ 135
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was viewed that as per the requirements of Ind AS 109, financial assets
are initially measured at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, these
should be measured at amortised cost, fair value through other
comprehensive income (FVOCI) or Fair Value through Profit and Loss
(FVTPL). Amoritsed cost classification is permissible for debt instruments
only if they meet both business model test and the contractual cash flow
characteristics test. Similarly, in Ind AS 109, there are conditions for financial
assets in case if they are valued at FVOCI or FVTPL.
However, in the given case, it was viewed that the disclosure with respect
to the fair value with regard to financial assets at amortized cost,
financial assets valued at Fair value through profit and loss and
financial assets valued at fair value through other comprehensive
income has not been provided in the financial statements. Also, the
measurement whether at cost or fair value through profit and loss or
fair value through other comprehensive income has not been defined.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 109 have not
been complied with.
136
Observations related to Other Disclosures
financial assets and the exposure to credit risk on loan commitments and
financial guarantee contracts. This information shall be provided
separately for financial instruments:
a. for which the loss allowance is measured at an amount equal to 12-
month expected credit losses;
b. for which the loss allowance is measured at an amount equal to
lifetime expected credit losses and that are:
i. financial instruments for which credit risk has increased
significantly since initial recognition but that are not credit-
impaired financial assets;
ii. financial assets that are credit-impaired at the reporting date (but
that are not purchased or originated credit impaired); and
iii. trade receivables, contract assets or lease receivables for which
the loss allowances are measured in accordance with paragraph
5.5.15 of Ind AS 109.
c. that are purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets.‖
Observation:
It was noted from the above stated disclosure on Financial Risk Management
that the trade receivables consisted of significant amount of receivable from
the Holding company, for which it was only stated that no credit risk is
involved.
It was viewed that information as required by paragraph 35M of Ind AS
107 regarding the 12-month expected credit losses or lifetime expected
credit losses have not been disclosed.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Ind AS 107 have not
been complied with.
‘ 137
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
The following discrepancies were noted with regard to disclosure of financial
risk and financial liabilities:
a) It was noted that the disclosure with regard to credit risk, liquidity risk
and market risk were made. However, while giving ―exposure to
liquidity risk‖, maturity analysis of financial assets held by
company for managing liquidity risk, was not disclosed. It is,
therefore, not in line with the requirement of paragraph B 11 E of Ind
AS 107.
b) It was further noted that under note to the financial statements on
Financial Risk Management, the company‘s financial liabilities at the
reporting date were disclosed and classified on the basis of remaining
contractual maturities of financial liabilities. However, the total of
138
Observations related to Other Disclosures
Observation:
It was noted that under Note on Financial Risk Management while giving
disclosure of liquidity risk, the Company did not disclose the interest
bearing and the average settlements days for each item of financial
liabilities as required by paragraph 39 of Ind AS 107.
‘ 139
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements ofInd AS 107 have not been
complied with.
Observation:
It was noted from the financial statements that one of the directors of the
company signed the Balance Sheet, Statement Profit and Loss, Statement of
Changes in Equity and Cash Flow Statement without incorporating his full
name and DIN (Director Identification Number).
It was viewed that the director should incorporate his full name and
DIN, below his signature in order to identify his authentication.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Section 134 read with
section 158 of Companies Act, 2013 have not been complied with.
140
Observations related to Other Disclosures
‘ 141
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the above stated note that the company received advance
in earlier year from ABC Limited as part of consideration for restructuring.
However, the company did not specify under which heading the said amount
has been reported.
To enhance the readability and understanding of financial statements, it
was viewed that the company should have disclosed that under which
note the said amount has been disclosed.
142
Chapter-7
Observations related to Auditor‟s
Report
1. Going Concern
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report and Financial
Statements
An abstract of Emphasis of Matter given in the auditor‘s report was as under:
“Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to Note XX to the standalone financial statements which
more fully describe that uncertainty faced by the company in signing PPA
and various factors affecting the progress of the project resulted in stoppage
of work. However, management is confident that current situation is
temporary and does not have any going concern issue. Our opinion is not
qualified in respect of the above matters.‖
An abstract of the related note to the financial statements on Going Concern
reads as under:
“Going Concern
The company incorporated a SPV for developing Hydroelectric Power Project
on BOOT basis. The project involved the development of a Hydroelectric
Power Project on a river. Concession period for the project was 35 years
from the date of COD (Commencement of Distribution). Though the project
received all major clearances and approvals including environmental
clearances and all major contracts for the project were awarded, but Power
purchase agreement was yet to be signed. Over a period of time, the
scenario in power sector changed substantially and in absence of financial
closure funding of the project had been a major issue leading to frequent
stoppages at work. The proposed Hydro Power Policy was eagerly awaited
which will hopefully bring more opportunity in this sector. The company was
hopeful that power purchase agreement would be signed under the new
policy which will also enable the financial closure to be done. Policy
initiatives taken by Government to address key concern facing the power
sector will enable the sector to keep pace with the growing demand. The
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
management was of the view that the present situation in power business
was temporary and does not foresee any need for impairment.‖
Observation:
It was observed that the separate section on going concern was not
reported by the auditor as required by SA 570 (Revised) although there
were certain events as evident from the note on Going Concern given in
financial statements of the company, which could cast material
uncertainty about going concern.
It was further noted that the auditor did not comment as per section 143(3)(f)
of the Companies Act, 2013 in his report.
144
Observations related to Auditor‟s Report
‘ 145
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted from the introductory paragraph and opinion paragraph given in
Auditor‘s Report that the auditor has commented on the Balance Sheet, the
Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then
ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
However, it was noted that after the implementation of Ind AS in standalone
financial statements, the financial statements included the Balance sheet,
Statement of Profit and loss (including the other comprehensive income),
statement of cash flow and the statement of change in equity. However, the
phrase “including the other comprehensive income” and “statement of
change in equity” were not given by the auditor in his audit report.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the Auditor‘s Report is not in line with the
requirements of SA 700 Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial
Statements read with Annexure I of Implementation Guide on Auditor‘s
Report under Ind AS for transition phase.
146
Observations related to Auditor‟s Report
‘ 147
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
The following non-compliances were observed:
1. With regard to paragraph (a) given under EOM (Emphasis of Matter)
regarding valuation of metal, it was noted that that the value of stock is
material. It was further noted that since sufficient information is not given
under Note 1, the auditor cannot draw Emphasis of matter based on this
note. Hence, it was viewed that if the effect is material, then the auditor
should have qualified his report instead of giving EOM on the same.
2. With regard to paragraph (b) regarding the confirmation of outstanding
balances, it was noted that with regard to debit balances (including trade
receivables), the company had not recognized expected credit losses on
financial assets including trade receivables. Further, it was stated that
the balance of trade receivables which was disclosed as good was
subject to confirmation from parties. Trade receivable would have
material effect on the assets side of the balance sheet as it constituted
more than 50% of total assets size. Further, with regard to credit
balances, it was noted from another note to the financial statements that
the amount of trade payables was 85% of total liabilities. As per the
definition of trade payables, it is in respect of amount due on account of
goods purchased or services rendered in the normal course of business
and expected to be settled in the company‘s normal operating cycle or
due to be settled within twelve months from the reporting date. However,
in the given case, material items of trade receivable and credit balances
have been stated to be ―subject to confirmation of parties‖ which raises
148
Observations related to Auditor‟s Report
‘ 149
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the auditor had given reference of Note 35 for the
disclosure on SBNs.
It was observed that the disclosure of SBNs was given under Note 36, hence,
reference to Note 36 of the financial statements should be drawn in the
auditor‘s report as against the currently drawn reference to Note 35. The
references to the financial statements and the related information should be
drawn appropriately so as to enable the reader of the financial statements
understand the contents in an appropriate manner.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the reference in the auditor‟s report was
incorrect, such mistakes should be avoided.
150
Chapter-8
Observations related to CARO, 2016
1. Reporting under CARO
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report
Abstract of paragraph (ii) and (iii) given under Annexure I to the Auditor‘s
Report read as below:
―(ii)… As informed, no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification carried out during the year.
(iii) As informed, the company….‖
Observation:
It was observed that while reporting in pursuance to the requirements of
paragraph (ii) and (iii) of CARO, 2016, the auditor appears to have reported
based on information received from management only. As per the above
stated guidance under CARO, 2016, the auditor should exercise his
professional judgement and experience on various matters to be
reported under CARO. However, from the given reporting it appears that
the same has not been done by the auditor.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 read with
Guidance Note on the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2016 have not
been complied with.
2. Immovable Properties
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report
Abstract of Auditor‘s report under CARO read as follows:
According to the information and explanations given to us and the records
examined by us, in case of properties earlier held by merged entity we report
that the title deeds of immovable properties are yet to be transferred in t he
name of the reporting company. In respect of few land pieces procedure for
transfer in the name of the company are yet to be completed. The company
has clear title in respect of other immovable properties.
152
Observations related to CARO, 2016
Observation:
The auditor reported that the title deeds of immovable properties of merged
entity are yet to be transferred in the name of the reporting company, and in
respect of few land pieces, procedure for transfer in the name of the
company are yet to be completed.
It was observed that the auditor has not reported the details of
immovable properties where the title deeds are not in the name of the
reporting company, i.e. total number of cases, whether leasehold /
freehold, gross block and net block, (as at Balance Sheet date), and
remarks, if any which is required as per the above stated requirement.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 read with
Guidance Note on the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2016 have not
been complied with.
3. Loans Granted
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report and Financial
Statements
Paragraph (iii) and (viii) of auditors report under CARO read with Disclosure
of Loans to Subsidiaries, Associates and Others, abstract of Balance Sheet
and Note on Current Loans stated as follows:
―(iii) The Company has granted unsecured loans, to companies, firms,
Limited Liability Partnership or other parties covered in the register
maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. These loans are
Interest free and there is no stipulation as to repayment of the loan. In our
opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the
terms and conditions of the loans given by company are prima facie not
prejudicial to the interest of the company for the reasons fully explained in
relevant notes to the standalone Ind AS financial statements.
―(viii) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanation given to us by the management, during the year there has been
delay in timely repayment of its dues to banks for ECB and to financial
institution for debentures. In respect of working capital facilities from Banks
there has been over drawings in the accounts during the year as well as at
year end. Accounts were overdrawn as at end of the reporting year.‖
‘ 153
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
154
Observations related to CARO, 2016
given at a rate of interest lower than the prevailing yield of one year,
three year, five year or ten year government security closest to the tenor
of the loan.‖
Paragraph 5.5.1 of Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments - Impairment
―.. An entity shall recognise a loss allowance for expected credit losses
on a financial asset that is measured in accordance with paragraphs
4.1.2 or 4.1.2A, a lease receivable, a contract asset or a loan
commitment and a financial guarantee contract to which the impairment
requirements apply in accordance with paragraphs 2.1(g), 4.2.1(c) or
4.2.1(d).‖
Paragraph 3 of SA 580, Written Representation
―Although written representations provide necessary audit evidence, they
do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence on their own abou t
any of the matters with which they deal. Furthermore, the fact that
management has provided reliable written representations does not affect
the nature or extent of other audit evidence that the auditor obtains about
the fulfillment of management‘s responsibilities, or about specific
assertions.‖
Observation:
The following discrepancies were noted with regard to auditor‘s reporting
under the paragraph3 (iii) (a):
i) As per the Guidance Note on CARO, 2016, the auditor while providing
his opinion about whether the terms and conditions of the loans are
prejudicial or not to the interest of the Company, has to consider many
factors such as borrower‘s financial standing, nature of the security,
rate of interest rate etc.
In the given case, it was noted that the company has provided loans to
subsidiaries and associates without interest. Further, it was noted that
under Note on Disclosure of Loans to Subsidiaries, Associates and
Others, the Company had stated about financial weakness in few of its
subsidiaries and that the company was exploring various options to
regularize the said loans. It was also observed from the balance sheet
that the company had borrowings towards which interest is being paid.
‘ 155
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Further, it was noted from Paragraph (viii) of CARO 2016 that the
company had defaulted in repayment of principal and interest in
respect of the borrowings.
It was viewed that providing interests free loans without repayment
period read together with the facts stated in note on Disclosure of
Loans to Subsidiaries, Associates and Others, it can reasonably be
concluded that such loans are prejudicial to the interest of the
company. Considering such facts and circumstances, it was also
viewed that since section 186 of Companies Act, 2013 has not been
complied with, it is incorrect to state that loans given by the company
are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
ii) Further, as stated in note on Disclosure of Loans to Subsidiaries,
Associates and Others, the financial condition of some of the
subsidiaries is weak, which indicates that under Ind AS 109, loans to
those entities are impaired and an expected credit loss should have
been made in the books. However, no provision was made for
expected credit loss on these financial assets. It was not in line with
the requirement of paragraph 5.5.1 of Ind AS 109, Financial
Instruments.‖
iii) It was noted that under note on Disclosure of Loans to Subsidiaries,
Associates and Others, it was stated that ‗the auditors have relied on
the Management‘s representation‘. It appears from this statement that
the information reported under this note has been reported on the
basis of the information provided by the company only and that the
same have been relied upon by the auditor viz. name of subsidiaries
and associates to whom the interest free loans have been provided,
that the terms and conditions of these loans are not prejudicial to the
interest of the company, these loans are in compliant with the
provisions of Section 185 of the Companies Act 2013, the efforts are
being made to recover the loans from subsidiaries and that the
company is looking at various options to regularize the loans etc.
It was viewed that usage of the phrase ‗Auditors have relied on the
Management‘s representation‘ may lead the users of financial
statements to believe that the auditor has merely relied on the
information provided by the management without applying appropriate
audit procedures to verify the information with regard to loans given to
subsidiary and associate companies. It was not in line with the
requirements of SA 580.
156
Observations related to CARO, 2016
iv) Further, it was noted that under the note on ‗Current loans‘; loans
have been classified as considered good even though as per note on
Disclosure of Loans to Subsidiaries, Associates and Others, some
loans were not recoverable. Accordingly, it was viewed that classifying
all the current loans as ‗considered good‘ was not correct.
Accordingly, it was viewed that requirements of CARO 2016, Ind AS 109,
Standards on Auditing and Companies Act, 2013 have not been
complied with.
4. Loans Granted
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report
Abstract of Auditor‘s Report under CARO read as follows:
―(iii) The company has granted loans to 3 (Three nos.) parties covered in the
register maintained under section 189 for some part of the year:
a....
b. There are no overdue more than rupees one lakh in respect of the loan
granted to the bodies corporate listed in the register maintained under
section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013.‖
‘ 157
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
c) If the amount is overdue, state the total amount overdue for more
than 90days, and whether reasonable steps have been taken by the
company for recovery of the principal and interest.‖
Observation:
It was noted that the auditor reported as ―there is no overdue for more
than rupees one lakh in respect of the loan granted to the bodies
corporate listed in the register maintained u/s 189 of the Act.” However,
as per the above stated requirement, it was viewed that the auditor is
required to report on the amount overdue over 90 days. It was viewed
that there is no monetary limit that has been stipulated under requirements of
CARO, 2016.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 have not
been complied with.
5. Loans Granted
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report
Abstract of CARO of a company read as follows:
―In our opinion and according to information and explanation given to us, the
company has complied with the provision of Section 186 of the Act with
respect to its Investments. The company has given guarantees and security
in compliance with section 185 and 186 of the Act. The company has granted
Loans and advances u/s. 185 and 186 of the Act which as per the information
and explanations given by the company to us and as described in the
financial statements are interest free and given to promote the interest of the
company are not in conformity of the provision of Section 186 of the
Companies Act 2013. We are informed that, due to bad financial position,
some of these subsidiaries are unable to regularize the advances given
earlier as described in the note to the standalone Ind AS financial
statements.‖
Principle: Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2016
Paragraph 3 (iv)
―In respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security whether
provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been
complied with. If not, provide the details thereof.‖
158
Observations related to CARO, 2016
Observation:
It was noted that the auditor has reported that section 186 of
Companies Act, 2013 has not been complied with, however, the details
of non-compliance of section 186 were not given which is not in line with
the requirement of paragraph 39 (B) (c) of Guidance Note on CARO, 2016.
‘ 159
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 have not
been complied with.
6. Statutory Dues
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report
Abstract of Auditor‘s report under CARO read as follows:
…
vii (a) The company is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities
undisputed statutory dues including investor education protection fund
,income tax ,sales tax, wealth tax ,service tax & custom duty and other
material statutory dues applicable to it. According to the information and
explanations given to us , no undisputed amounts payable in respect of
provident fund , income tax ,sales tax, wealth tax, custom duty, VAT, Cess
and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31st March 20XX for
a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) As the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of the
verification of the records of the company, the details of statutory dues which
have not been deposited on account of disputes are given in Annexure
hereto.
…
160
Observations related to CARO, 2016
Observation:
It was noted that the auditor did not report whether the company is
regular in depositing dues of provident fund, employees state
insurance, duties of excise, value added tax and cess. Further reporting
included investor education and protection fund and wealth tax whi ch was
not in line with the requirements given under paragraph 3 (vii) (a) CARO
2016.
Further, it was noted that the annexure as stated above was not provided for
reporting under paragraph 3 (vii) (b) with this report.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 have
not been complied with.
‘ 161
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
Observation:
It was noted that the auditor reported about the regularity of undisputed dues
namely Provident Fund, employee‘s state insurance fund, wealth tax, custom
duty, excise duty and cess. However, the auditor did not comment with
respect to sales tax, service tax and value added tax while reporting in
pursuance to the above stated requirement of CARO, 2016.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 have not
been complied with.
Observation:
It was noted from Paragraph (vii) of CARO, 2016 wherein the auditor
reported that there were no dues of Sales Tax, Service Tax/GST and Value
162
Observations related to CARO, 2016
added tax which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on
account of any dispute ―except for the following dues of Income Tax‖.
However, it was observed that no further details were reported by the auditor
on income tax related disputes as per the above stated requirements of
CARO 2016.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 have
not been complied with.
9. Contingent Liabilities
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report and Financial
Statements
The Contingent Liabilities included a disputed income tax demand which
remained the same for the last three years and same amount was reported
by the auditor while reporting under paragraph 3(vii) (a) of CARO, 2016.
Observation:
It was noted from note on the Contingent Liabilities that there is a disputed
income tax demand which remained same for the last three years. The same
amount was reported by the auditor while reporting under paragraph 3(vii) (a)
of CARO, 2016 which implies that interest component on the said amount
was ignored.
As per the above stated requirements of Guidance Note on CARO 2016,
penalty and/or interest levied under the respective laws gets covered
within the term “amounts payable”.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of Guidance Note on CARO
2016 have not been complied with.
‘ 163
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
10. Fraud
Matter contained in the Auditor‟s Report
Abstract of the Auditor‘s Report stated as follows:
―During the course of our examination of the books and records of the
Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
practices in India, and according to the information and explanations given to
us, we have neither come across any instance of material fraud by the
Company or on the Company by its officers or employees, noticed or
reported during the year, nor have we been informed of any such case by the
Management.‖
Observation:
It was noted that the nomenclature “Material Fraud” has been used by
the Company instead of “any frauds”. It was viewed that the auditor has
to report on all frauds whether material or not as required by paragraph
(x) of CARO, 2016.
Accordingly, it was viewed that the requirements of CARO, 2016 have not
been complied with.
164
Observations related to CARO, 2016
Observation:
It was noted that in pursuance to the aforesaid requirement the auditor has
reported that the company has paid/provided Managerial remuneration
during the year as per the Board resolution which is subject to approval by
the shareholders in the forthcoming meeting.
It was viewed that the auditor did not explicitly report as to whether the
managerial remuneration is paid in accordance with the provision of
section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act, 2013. The
auditor only gave reference to the Note explaining the managerial
remuneration, without commenting about the compliance with the aforesaid
provisions.
‘ 165
Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements
166
Observations related to CARO, 2016
Observation:
It was noted that even though the auditor reported that preferential
allotment of preference shares and debentures was made by the
company yet he omitted to comment on compliance of section 42 of the
Companies Act, 2013 as well as the utilization of amount raised for the
purpose for which funds were raised.
Accordingly, it was viewed that incomplete reporting has been done by the
auditor under paragraph (xiv) of CARO, 2016.
‘ 167