8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.

com

U a

Types of Bots: An Overview

Learn more about all the different varieties of bots, and what they can do for
you

Introduction
There are tons of bots out there.  So many bots, with so many different reasons to exist .  And the
context that’s used to discuss them can vary wildly – some people are focused on the utopian
possibilities of bots, others are focused entirely on all the bad stuff bots can do.

With the space that bots exist in being so large, it can be challenging to get your head around all
the different things that people can mean when they refer generally to “bots”:

“I’m glad we’re all on board with the bot initiative….”

 

In this article, we’ll lay out a framework for thinking about the space:

Good Bots versus Bad Bots

How should we categorize bots?
Generalist bots vs Specialist bots
Bot Intelligence on the continuum from simple to complex
How many bots exist?

If you Google “what are bots?”, 5 of the top 10 results returned are focused on the negative
aspects.  From the security company Norton, you see the title “Cybercrime – What Are Bots?”.
 From reputable publications like Time magazine, there are alarming titles like “How Bad Bots Are
Destroying the Internet”.  You see similar results (~50% negative results) when you Google
“different types of bots”.

In fact, if you take the Google search engine results page for “what are bots” and run it through
AlchemyAPI, the keyword extraction and sentiment analysis scores show exactly how bleak the
picture is:

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 1/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Well, that’s interesting!  And it paints a pretty scary picture of the world of bots, which I don’t
think is (entirely) deserved.

Yes, there are bad people out there who create virtual mountains of spam, and even worse people
who break the law, and sometimes they use bots.  But the promise of bots as agents for good, in
the form of gained productivity and new business opportunities, is also tremendous.

So, the first lens we’ll use to look at the bot landscape is “good bots” versus “bad bots”, along with
some examples of bots in each category.

Good Bots
Chatbots
Crawlers
Transactional bots
Informational bots
Entertainment bots: Art bots, Game bots

Bad Bots
Hackers
Spammers
Scrapers
Impersonators

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 2/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Good Bots
Chatbots

My definition of chatbots is very narrow, on purpose: chatbots are bots that are designed
to carry on conversations with humans, usually just for fun, and to test the limits of the
technology.  Chatbots usually have a “personality” similar to a human, and there usually isn’t a
goal for the interaction other than to see what the chatbot says.
There’s another common usage of “chatbots” that essentially includes ALL bots, (i.e. if it’s
automated, and you carry on a conversation with it, it’s a chatbot).  I think this is confusing, and
misses the point.  Specifically, there’s a promise inherent in the word “chatbots”.  The promise is
that you will be carrying on a conversation with the bot, and understanding human language is a
really hard problem.  Therefore, we shouldn’t be setting the expectation that users are going to
be having a “chat” with a bot.  People do weird things like anthropomorphize bots and even try
to have sex with them.  When given space to ask natural language questions, people will
routinely say BIZARRE things.  For all these reasons, “chatbot” is fine in the narrow context of
human-like AI that is designed to be chatted with for fun. But we shouldn’t be setting the
expectation that the bots we’re building will have a natural language, conversational interface
by branding them as “chatbots”.
ELIZA is the godmother of all chatbots.  The bot runs a simple question-and-response script
that automatically generates responses to questions, in a style similar to a psychotherapist.
Cleverbot is a more advanced example that uses AI to learn from interactions.
Tay is a Microsoft AI chatbot that converses with people via Twitter. It got big press early in
2016 when it was launched, and people quickly began trying to break it, making it say awful
things.

Crawlers

These bots run continuously in the background, primarily fetch data from other APIs or
websites, and are “well-behaved” in that they respect directives you give them.
For example, you can “hide” your entire website from search engines by blocking search engine
spiders in your site’s robots.txt file, keeping all of your site’s content out of Google or Bing, or
Yandex, or whatever.
Search engine spiders are crawlers that extract URLs from documents, which are then passed
off to the indexing infrastructure to download the content from each URL, which is then parsed,
and built into a searchable index.
Googlebot and bingbot are the two most common examples of search engine spiders.
Other crawlers include bots that monitor other systems for change.
Pricing Assistant is bot that monitors ecommerce websites for price changes.
Alerbot monitors websites for server uptime, website errors, bugs and performance issues.

Transactional bots

Bots in this category act as agents on behalf of humans, and interact with external systems to
accomplish a specific transaction, moving data from one platform to another.
Since bots can interact with any endpoint that has an API, Transactional bots can do LOTS of
things, and lots of custom solutions are to be expected here.
Transactional bots fit into the area of robotic business process automation (BPA), which is
expected to grow from $180MM in 2013 to $5B by 2020.  
The upside of BPA is increased productivity.  The downside is losing human jobs.  Oxford
released a study in 2013 Oxford released a study estimating that 47% of current human jobs
were in jeopardy due to automation.  This tension between technological progress and human
costs is very contentious, to say the least.
Birdly is a Slackbot, which you activate via specific /slash commands, and it will go retrieve
specific data for you, e.g. a customer record from Salesforce.
x.ai has given their bot a human persona, Amy Ingram, who interacts with people via email to
automatically find meeting times for distributed teams.

Informational bots

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 3/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Bots in this category surface helpful information, often as push notifications, and include things
like breaking news stories.
Techcrunch has a personalized news recommendation bot that pushes content to you via
Facebook Messenger or Telegram.
Some informational bots broadcast data as it becomes available.
@MassBudgetBot tweets when Massachusetts state budget earmarks are approved.

Entertainment bot: Art bots, Game bots

Art bots are designed to be appreciated aesthetically.
Deep Drumpf uses deep learning, applied to transcripts of speeches, to learn how to speak like
Donald Trump.
RealHumanPraise takes positive movie reviews from Rotten Tomatoes, and replaces actors
with Fox News personalities, and tweets every 2 minutes.
Video game bots function as characters, often for humans to play against or to practice and
develop skills in first-person shooter games.
There are tons of video game bots.
Another category is bots you play games against.
Detective is an example of this kind of bot, which is a variation of a Turing test. You text back
and forth with another “agent” (human or bot) and attempt to figure out which it is.
Google Assistant has all kinds of games you can play, including Emoji Riddles, Emoji Detective,
etc.

Bad Bots
If you’re interested in really getting into the weeds on bad bots, I highly recommend Distil’s 2017
Bad Bots Report. It’s one of the most comprehensive and digestible summaries of bad bot activity
I’ve come across.

Hackers

Hacker bots are designed to distribute malware, deceive individual people, attack websites, and
sometimes entire networks.
These bots exploit security vulnerabilities to inject code into the victim’s site.
Hacker bots can create denial of services (DDoS) attacks by distributing their attack across
many different proxies, and are designed to have browser-like signatures.
Google has said that 180% more sites were hacked in 2015 vs 2014.
Once enough hacked computers have been taken over, they can be used for a variety of
nefarious purposes.
Individual computers that are affected are known as “zombies”
Networks of infected computers are known as “botnets”.

Scrapers

Scraper bots are designed to steal content (email addresses, images, text, etc) from other
websites.
Scraped content is often remixed and pumped back out as published pages.
Published pages are designed to capture human visitors who are searching for specific
keywords, and those visitors are monetized via advertising (AdSense is a classic example).

Spammers

Spambots are designed to post crappy promotional content around the web, and ultimately
drive traffic to the spammer’s website.
Forum and comment spambots are a classic example here. Bots post garbage content into a
forum or blog comments, with links to their spam site.
Volume of spambots has declined in recent years, due to search engines making these tactics
unprofitable.

Impersonators

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 4/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Bots in the Impersonator category are designed to mimic natural user characteristics, making
them hard to identify.
Impersonators also include propaganda bots that are designed to sway political opinion one
way or another, often by drowning dissenting opinions.
Turkey, Mexico, and other nations have used Twitter impersonator bots for these purposes.
Researchers at the University of Southern California studied the use of social bots in the 2016
U.S. Presidential election, and concluded that “the presence of social media bots can indeed
negatively affect democratic political discussion rather than improving it, which in turn can
potentially alter public opinion.”

How Should We Categorize Bots?

Bot classification is arbitrary. To be clear, we’re all just making it up. Literally.

In the examples I pointed out, above, I made five primary categories for “good bots”.  John
Borthwick, CEO of betaworks, says there are six types of bots. Others say seven, or four. What’s
the right way to categorize bots? Is it by the domain they function in? Their purpose? Who
chooses?

Inevitably, the author (me included) comes up with some model that makes sense to their mind at
that moment. The problem is that the moment changes, while the model stays the same, and
you’re left with a messy jumble of opinions.

If you look at two bot directories, BotList and Chatbottle, you can see the differences in how
personal definitions impact classification.

Botlist data shows that the Personal bot category is one of the largest categories for Facebook
Messenger bots. Chatbottle data shows that Personal bots is one of the smallest categories.
Who’s right?

Because the market is going to change, I’m going to focus on a heuristic rather than a strict
classification system.  It’s a high-level classification of bots into either “generalist bots” or
“specialist bots”.

Generalist bots vs Specialist bots

The heuristic of “generalist bots” versus “specialist bots” is helpful is that it recognizes a primary
market dynamic: Huge companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, etc, are all building bot-
like services.

On the one hand, this can seem discouraging for many bot developers. How can my dinky little bot
compete with Siri? Or Google Now? The answer is that your individual bot doesn’t have to
compete.

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 5/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Big companies seem to be focusing on the “generalist” aspect of bots. Take for example this
statement from Google’s Hal Varian on predicting what to build:

One easy way to forecast the future is to predict that what rich people have now, middle class people
will have in five years, and poor people will have in ten years. It worked for radio, TV, dishwashers,
mobile phones, flat screen TV, and many other pieces of technology.
What do rich people have now? Chauffeurs? In a few more years, we’ll all have access to driverless
cars. Maids? We will soon be able to get housecleaning robots. Personal assistants? That’s Google
Now. This area will be an intensely competitive environment: Apple already has Siri and Microsoft is
hard at work at developing their own digital assistant.

Most of the big companies seem to be focusing on “generalist” bots, while many companies and
individual bot developers are building “specialist” bots.

These “generalist” bots will have an important role to play, in that they may often be the first step
in a multi-step process to complete a task.

I may start my interaction by saying “OK Google”, but where I go from there will depend on what
job I need done.  Google can route my request, but if I need to fight a parking ticket, I need a very
specialized bot like DoNotPay.

In this model, individual “specialist bots” will be the last mile of connection between the customer
and the job-to-be-done.

Generalist bots can understand what you’re asking, but they don’t have the specific domain
expertise to follow through with action. This is especially true in the enterprise, where solutions
are hard to generalize. Specialist bots will provide the domain-specific knowledge necessary to
accomplish many valuable tasks.

This dynamic of generalists-vs-specialist bots is one of the most helpful heuristics I’ve come
across in thinking about how to classify bots.

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 6/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Image credit

The thing I like about this heuristic is that it recognizes the massive size of the space we’re in, and
points out the potential there is in building highly specialized bots. DoNotPay is not only an
amazing, practical and useful service, but it was built by a single 18-year-old. Think about that.

Bot Intelligence
The next lens we’ll use to think about bots is related to intelligence of the bot.  Some bots use
elements of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in order to understand language,
process complex requests, and manage dynamic outputs.  And while it’s true that some bots are
heavily reliant on AI & ML, other bots are far simpler.

The media seems to spend a fair amount of time talking about bots in the context of AI.  As a
result, my suspicion is that many people are conflating the two concepts (bots + AI = all bots are
intelligent agents).  That’s not the case at all.

Bots exist along a continuum.  At the simple end there are Script Bots, and at the complex end are
Intelligent Agents (called “Cutting edge bots” in the graphic):

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 7/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Image credit

Script Bots
The simplest bots are script bots.  The entire interaction is based off of a pre-determined model
(the “script”) that determines what the bot can and cannot do.  The “script” is a decision tree
where responding to one question takes you down a specific path, which opens up a new, pre-
determined set of possibilities.  It’s basically like a Choose Your Own Adventure (for those old
enough to remember Choose Your Own Adventure, or books).

The important thing to recognize with a script bot is that the bot’s domain is necessarily limited.  If
a customer service bot allows you to select from red, blue, or green, and you try to select
magenta, the interaction fails.  Limiting the interaction with a bot by defining a narrow set of
acceptable inputs might feel restrictive, but there are strong arguments for it.  By being very
explicit about the limits of the bot’s domain (and grammar of acceptable responses), you keep the
interaction very directed, and the quality of the user experience stays very high.

Sometimes a script bot may use natural language processing (NLP) on the front end of the
interaction, to parse out words that may match an answer in their script.  This is enticing, but
kinda dangerous from a user experience perspective.  Language is a really hard problem.  If you
give people the impression that they can talk with the bot the way they would talk with a human,
the bot may have a hard time understanding the inputs.  This leads to aggravating error-recovery
behavior in this example with the Poncho weather bot:

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 8/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

Script bots that want to use NLP as a “chatty” front end need to think very carefully about this.
 People will be people, and they will go off script.  How does your bot handle these unplanned-for
interactions?

One method is to fail over to a human customer service agent, which brings us up the Bot
Intelligence Continuum to Smart Bots.

Smart Bots
Much of the excitement around bots focuses around the *possibilities* of bots, given the massive
advances in ML and AI in recent years.  And some of this excitement is well-founded.  Many bots
have a heavy server-side processing component, which allows them access to massive computing
power in understanding and responding to queries.  Couple that with the open-sourcing of AI
software libraries like Theano and TensorFlow, and you have the ingredients for some amazing
human-bot interactions.

Many of the bots getting the most media coverage leverage AI for the first response mechanism.
 If the interaction takes a turn that the AI can’t handle, the system falls back on a human agent to
sort things out.  Examples of this are Clara, Fin and Facebook M.

When you think about the AI + Human Agent model, it seems like a natural for customer service
applications.  Maybe you just want to know how much your next bill is, or when it’s due, which
would be easy enough for a bot to handle.  If the query gets much more complex (“Why didn’t I get
the bill credit I expected?”) then the interaction is transferred to a human agent.

Intelligent Agents
Intelligent Agents is a deliberate kludge of all the other customer-facing AI technology.  They
range from DeepMind’s AlphaGo to Tesla developing self-driving cars.  This is a very diverse,
rapidly accelerating space.

The main differentiator between Intelligent Agents and Smart Bots is that Intelligent Agents they
are designed to be autonomous.  If operating correctly, they should require no human
intervention in order to perform their tasks correctly.  Google’s self-driving cars are designed
without steering wheels for humans, because they shouldn’t be necessary.  x.ai has a bot that
schedules meetings for you, Amy Ingram, and she manages all the back-and-forth with zero
oversight.

Because research in artificial intelligence and machine learning is accelerating so rapidly, this area
is the most difficult to make predictions about, and the most difficult to encapsulate.  But the
public also needs to have their expectations set correctly.  We’re still at least 50 years from being
able to expect something that is true Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).  So we can marvel at
self-driving cars, at the same time we realize it’ll be 2066 before we get to fall in love with Her.

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 9/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

How Many Bots Exist?

Coming up with credible numbers around how many bots exist is very difficult. Each bot platform
(messenger app) has a vested interest in making their ecosystem look healthy, and so they’re
inclined to inflate their numbers.  As of spring 2017, the claims are as follows:

Facebook claims “over 100,000 bots” on Messenger 

Twitter may have 48 million bot accounts
Kik claims 20,000 bots on its platform
Microsoft Bot Framework claims “more than 20,000 developers have signed up and gotten
started.”
There are only a handful of Skype bots 
Wit.ai claims 21,500 developers

Topline numbers like this from technology companies should be looked at with a jaundiced eye.
 Tech companies want to give the impression of critical mass and momentum, so they tell us how
many people signed up.  Along this line, the number I’m most inclined to believe is Microsoft, who
says developers have “signed up and gotten started.”  The topline “signed up” numbers are going
to be WAY larger than the number of developers who actually create things, much less launch
them.

On the side of Good Bots, we tend to have platform operators who will inflate numbers to make
their platform ecosystem look healthy. On the Bad Bots side, we have developers who are
deliberately trying to obfuscate themselves.

If we want to narrow our focus to Good bots that live and work in messaging platforms, one of my
favorite services for surveying the landscape is Chatbottle. They rely on users submitting their
bots, which means that these bots are intended to be used (as opposed to a developer tinkering
on the weekend) and they’re at least somewhat production-ready.  Chatbottle’s counts are:

860 bots for Facebook Messenger

85 bots for Skype
206 bots for Telegram
176 bots for Slack

If we expand our focus beyond bots that live in messaging apps, on the Good bots side, Udger has
been documenting known internet bots that interact with websites (which ends up being a mix of
Crawlers, Transactional and Informational bots according to our framework).  It counts 868
known bots – some active, some inactive.  And these are just the bots that interact with websites!
 It doesn’t even begin to count how many bots exist inside other platforms (e.g. Slackbots,
Telegram bots, WeChat bots, Twitter bots, etc).

On the Bad bots side, there is a list called the Register Of Known Spam Operators (ROKSO) that is
maintained by SpamHaus.  This list provides very detailed information on individual spam
operators, including their names, addresses, shell companies they’ve created, examples of their
spam, etc.

It’s impossible to know exactly how many bots of each category and kind there are.  And it’s
probably not hugely important what the exact numbers are.  What’s more interesting is trying to
understand the market dynamics relative to where the market is moving.

The market is developing quickly.  I think with the launch of major bot platforms including the
Microsoft Bot Framework and bots for Facebook Messenger, we’re about to see an explosion in
Transactional and Informational bots that are focused on B2C audiences.  People will be building
bots that allow you to make some sort of commercial transaction or get a tidbit of information just
to capitalize on the huge audience of Messenger.

On the B2B side, I also think we’ll see an explosion of Transactional bots, but the transactions will
likely be exchanging data between platforms, rather than buying stuff.  The classic examples here
are Slackbots that people build to help them accomplish specific tasks at work.  Slackbotlist
counts 121, and there are probably many more than that.

botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 10/11
8/3/22, 5:52 PM Types of Bots: An Overview of Chatbot Diversity | botnerds.com

I certainly think that some standouts will appear early on (e.g. Birdly for filing expense reports,
Statsbot which surfaces Google Analytics data and was acquired by Google, etc).  But the market
is still in its infancy, and I think that more and more companies will look to develop their own bots
for their own specific needs as they realize just how powerful these bots can be for
communication and productivity.

Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions




botnerds.com/types-of-bots/ 11/11