FILTRATION Slides
FILTRATION Slides
FILTRATION
Filtration involves the removal of
suspended and colloidal particles from
the water by passing it through a layer or
bed of a porous granular material, such as
sand.
BITS PILANI 2
3/27/2023
CLASSIFICATION OF FILTERS
Based on the filter media
Sand filters, e.g. natural silica sand
Anthracite filters, e.g. crushed anthracitic
coal
Diatomaceous earth filters, e.g.
diatomaceous earth
Metal fabric filters (microstrainers), e.g.
stainless
Steel fabric filter.
}
various biological, physical and chemical processes.
Biological processes
Physical
Chemical
Polluted water
Microorganisms
Sand
Gravel Drinking-water
Advantages
Simple to construct and supervise
Suitable where sand is readily available
Effective in bacterial removal
Preferable for uniform quality of treated
water
Disadvantages
Large area is required
Unsuitable for treating highly turbid waters
Less flexibility in operation due to seasonal
variations in raw water quality
3/27/2023 BITS PILANI 21
DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SSF
Parameter Recommended level
Design life 10-15 year
Period of operation 24 h/day
Filtration rate 0.1 – 0.2 m/h
Filter bed area 5-200 m2/filter (minimum of two filters)
Height of filter bed
Initial 0.8-0.9 m
Minimum 0.5-0.6 m
Effective size 0.15-0.3 mm
Uniformity coefficient <3
Height of underdrains + gravel layer 0.3-0.5 m
Height of supernatant water 1m
Advantages
Turbid water may be treated
Land required is less compared to slow sand
filter
Operation is continuous.
Disadvantages
Requires skilled personnel for operation and
maintenance
Less effective in bacteria removal
Operational troubles
Biological action
Electrolytic action
Filter Media :-
Sand:-
Uniformity Coefficient Cu=D60/D10
D60= Size in mm, such that 60% of the particles are finer
than this size.
(Effective size or diameter)
D10= Size in mm, such that 10% of the particles are finer
than this size.
Effective size shall be
0.2 to 0.3 for slow sand filters
0.45 to 0.7 for rapid sand filters
Cu 3 to 5 for slow sand filters
1.3 < Cu <1.7 for rapid sand filters
Anthracite:-
More costly than sand but greater volume per unit
weight, transportation cost vary be cheap.
Garnet Sand:-
High specific gravity = 4.2, dense, Very
high cost and may be used as constituent
in mixed media filter.
Other Materials:-
Such as coconut husks, burned rice husks,
crushed glass, slag metallic ores etc have
been used as filter material.
Classification Of Filters
1. Slow Sand Filter
2. Rapid Sand Filter
A.Gravity Type
B. Pressure Type
Filter Media
i. Sand
ii. Anthracite
iii. Garnet sand or ilmenite
iv. Other locally available materials
SLOW SAND FILTER
Essential Features:
1. Enclosure Tank
2. Filter Media
3. Base Material
4. Under Drainage System
SLOW SAND FILTER
GUIDE LINES FOR DESIGN OF SLOW SAND FILTER
DIAGRAMATIC SECTION OF RAPID SAND FILTER
DIAGRAMATIC SECTION OF RAPID SAND FILTER
COMPARISON BETWEEN SLOW AND RAPID SAND FILTER
DIAGRAMATIC SECTIONS OF PRESSURE
FILTERS
UPFLOW FILTER WITH RESTRAINING GRID
DUAL MEDIA BIFLOW FILTER
FLOW DIAGRAM OF A SMALL DIATOMITE
FILTER
TYPES OF RSF
RSF based on filter material, three types:
Single‐media filters: these have one
type of media, usually sand or crushed
anthracite coal
Dual‐media filters: these have two
types of media, usually crushed anthracite
coal and sand.
Multi‐media filters: these have three
types of media, usually crushed anthracite
coal, sand, and garnet.