Written Report
Written Report
1. Non-recording gauges
A rain gauge that uses a pair of buckets to measure rainfall. When one
bucket fills with 0.01 inches of rain, it tips, and the other bucket takes its
place. The time of each tip is recorded, which allows the amount of rain to be
calculated over variable or fixed intervals of time.
Figure 1.4. Ex. wind-shield installed to reduce wind effect on rain gauge measurements
Evaporation and Wetting Losses
Rain gauges with small orifices, non-recording gauges, and gauges that
record at long intervals can lose water due to evaporation. The amount of
evaporation depends on temperature, humidity, and time between rain and
collection. These errors are usually small and can be neglected except for low-
intensity rainfall events.
Calibration Errors
Tipping bucket rain gauges can underestimate rainfall at high rain rates
because the buckets cannot keep up with the rain. This can be corrected with rain
rate-dependent calibration, but this is time-consuming and not always done. Users
of tipping bucket rain gauges should be aware of this potential underestimation at
high rainfall intensities (>50 mm/h).
There are two main methods for estimating missing rainfall data:
Method of weightage or normal ratio method: This method is more complex than
the simple arithmetic average method, but it is also more accurate. In this
method, the normal annual precipitation at each of the selected stations is used
to calculate a weight for that station. The weights are then used to calculate a
weighted average of the rainfall at the 3 stations, which is then used as the
estimate of the missing value.
In addition to these two methods, there are a number of other methods that can be
used to estimate missing rainfall data. These methods include:
Use as many nearby stations as possible. The more stations that are available,
the more accurate the estimate will be.
Select stations that are evenly spaced around the station with the missing
record. This will help to ensure that the estimate is not biased towards any one
station.
Use stations that have similar climatic conditions. This will help to ensure that
the estimate is more accurate.
Use a method that is appropriate for the type of data that is missing. For
example, if the missing data is monthly rainfall, then a method that is designed
for monthly data should be used.
Estimating missing rainfall data can be a complex task, but it is an important
one. By using the right methods and techniques, you can get accurate estimates
that can be used for a variety of purposes.
Double-Mass Analysis
Changes in gage location, exposure, instrumentation, or observational procedure
may cause a relative change in the precipitation catch. Frequently these changes are
not disclosed in the published records. Current U.S. Environmental Data Service practice
calls for a new station identification whenever the gage location is changed by as much
as 5 mi (8 km) and/or 100 ft (30 m) in elevation. Double-mass analysis tests the
consistency of the record at a station by comparing its accumulated annual or seasonal
precipitation with the concurrent accumulated values of mean precipitation for a group
of surrounding stations. In Fig. 3-10, for example, a change in slope about 1961
indicates a change in the precipitation regime at Dillon, Colo. A change due to
meteorological causes would not cause a change in slope, as all base stations would be
similarly affected. The station history for Dillon discloses a change in gage location in
June 1961. To make the record prior to 1961 comparable with that for the more recent
location, it should be adjusted by the ratio of the slopes of the two segments of the
double-mass curve (0.74/1.19). The consistency of the record for each of the base
stations should be tested, and those showing inconsistent records should be dropped
before other stations are tested or adjusted. Considerable caution should be exercised
in applying the double-mass technique. The plotted points always deviate about a mean
line, and changes in slope should be accepted only when marked or substantiated by
other evi-dence. The double-mass analysis can be made on a computer.
Figure 3-10.
QUESTIONNAIRRES:
What are the different methods that can be used to estimate missing rainfall data?
What are the factors that affect the accuracy of missing rainfall data estimation?
What are the best practices for estimating missing rainfall data?
How can missing rainfall data be used to improve hydrological models?
What are the challenges of estimating missing rainfall data in remote areas?
Here are some specific questions that you could ask about each method:
What are the limitations of using the simple arithmetic average method?
When is the simple arithmetic average method most appropriate?
Method of weightage or normal ratio method:
How are the weights calculated in the method of weightage or normal ratio method?
What are the advantages of using the method of weightage or normal ratio method?
Regression analysis:
What type of mathematical model is typically used in regression analysis?
What are the challenges of using regression analysis to estimate missing rainfall data?
Geostatistical methods:
What are the different types of geostatistical methods that can be used to estimate
missing rainfall data?
What are the advantages of using geostatistical methods?
4. A __________ collects the amount of falling rain into a vessel that sits on a scale
and measures the weight of accumulated water. The measurements are traced
out on a chart which can be used to determine rainfall depth and intensity.
Answer: Weighing rain gauge
6. Rain gauges that are elevated above the ground can be affected by wind eddies,
which can cause the gauge to under-catch small raindrops.
Answer: Wind-induced errors
9. This type of rain gauges is relatively expensive and has been mainly used for
research purposes.
Answer: Optical rain gauge