25/03/2023, 16:28 What to read to understand how economists think | The Economist

ADVERTISEMENT

Menu Subscribe CH

The Economist reads | Economics

What to read to understand how economists think

Our senior economics writer picks five books for those starting to study the subject

Aug 9th 2022

Share

E conomics has a reputation as a dry, heartless subject, full of boring equations. The reality is much more
interesting. Thinking like an economist, as I see it, comprises two main features. The first is always to
think about trade-offs. There is no such thing as a free lunch, as Milton Friedman said. When someone gets
something, they almost always give something up in return. If you go out with your friends, you won’t have
time to go to the gym. If an economy’s wages go up, dividends might go down, or inflation might go up. And
so on. The second is to try, when possible, to put numbersGetoninvaluable
things. analysis
When of weglobal events.
say that Cancel at
China’s any time. Start
lockdowns arefre
“strict” what do we actually mean? If you think “job quality is getting worse every year” how are you going to
https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2022/08/09/what-to-read-to-understand-how-economists-think?utm_medium=social-media.cont… 1/5
25/03/2023, 16:28 What to read to understand how economists think | The Economist
strict , what do we actually mean? If you think job quality is getting worse every year , how are you going to
measure that? Sometimes it is not easy to quantify ideas, but it’s always good to try. In The Economist’s
coverage we always try to remember these two lessons. Here are five books that should help you think in this
way.

Capitalism and Freedom. By Milton Friedman. University of Chicago Press; 272 pages; $18 and £15

ADVERTISEMENT

Ignore the fact that Friedman was ultra-libertarian. It does not matter. Very often his arguments were plain
wrong. That does not matter either. This book is perhaps the best way to learn to think about trade-offs,
because that was how Friedman always thought about the world. For instance, consider minimum wages.
Friedman accepts that the people who receive them take home more money. But then the trade-offs come
steaming in. What, he asks, about the people who are now priced out of the labour market? Or take regulation
of medicines. Unnecessary, he says. Yes, you may save some lives by insisting that pharmaceutical companies
jump through hoops before taking a drug to market, as fewer dangerous drugs are sold. But those reviews will
also cost lives, he says, by delaying the delivery of safe drugs to patients. (In 2006 we published this article on
Friedman and his legacy.)

The Worldly Philosophers. By Robert Heilbroner. Touchstone; 368 pages; $18.99. Simon & Schuster; £8.99

In a cheerful, conversational style, Heilbroner takes the reader through the writings of the earliest
economists, explaining why their ideas were so revolutionary. Adam Smith did not have much data to hand,
but he put numbers to his arguments when he could. So did Karl Marx, who gathered data from newspapers
and parliamentary reports. Marx was also a big believer in trade-offs—he argued, for instance, that the world
had to endure capitalism in the short term in order, eventually, to reach a socialist utopia in the long term.
David Ricardo tried to think through the trade-offs involved in economic activity—for instance, in his theory
of comparative advantage.

Africa: Why Economists Get It Wrong. By Morten Jerven. Bloomsbury Academic; 176 pages; $21.95. Zed Books;
£14.99

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2022/08/09/what-to-read-to-understand-how-economists-think?utm_medium=social-media.cont… 2/5
25/03/2023, 16:28 What to read to understand how economists think | The Economist

It is great to use numbers, but you have to be careful. This book, by a specialist in African economies, shows
how important that is. A lot of economists plug data from Africa into huge statistical models, seeking to
explain, for instance, why social trust is higher in one part of a country than another. But a lot of this research
is based on shoddy data. For instance, in 2015 the gdp of South Sudan was either unchanged from the year
before or shrank by 11%, depending on whether you believe the imf or the World Bank. One lesson from the
book (which we reviewed in 2015) is to be upfront about the limitations of your data sources. Another is to try
less fancy analysis—say, using descriptive statistics rather than attempting to tease out causality. This is less
prestigious and less impressive, but it may produce results that are likelier to stand the test of time.

Capitalism, Alone. By Branko Milanovic. Harvard University Press; 304 pages; $19.95 and £15.95

This is the book to read if you want to understand why capitalism—and economists’ way of thinking—has
triumphed the world over. By the beginning of the 1990s, it was clear that the capitalist system had defeated
the communist one. Today, however, many people yearn to move to a new system, such as “millennial
socialism”. A left-leaning scholar, Mr Milanovic sympathises with these feelings. But ultimately he finds
many radical prescriptions unconvincing. A country which tried to de-marketise on the scale envisaged by
socialists would, he says, be unstable and dissatisfied in other ways. Shifting towards a much shorter working
week, for instance, would leave it poorer than its neighbours. For how long would people put up with that?
Capitalism is far from perfect, his book shows, yet it is hard to shake the notion that it is the only system that
broadly works.

Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. By Stephen J. Dubner and
Steven Levitt. HarperCollins; 352 pages; $16.99. Penguin: £10.99

This book is so famous that it seems a cliché to choose it, but if you haven’t read it, you really should. (We
reviewed it, in 2005.) Fundamentally, it is (again) about trade-offs. It goes through lots of fun examples,
showing how policies can have unintended consequences. For example, when a nursery imposed a fine on
parents who were late to pick up their kids, more parents started turning up late. The fine had inadvertently
removed a moral disincentive for parents to be on time. They thought of it as a price. Other examples in the
book include the question of why drug-dealers live with their parents, and whether legalising abortion
reduces crime. The book is not everyone’s cup of tea. Some of the studies discussed in it have been called into
question. But the overall lesson is a useful one: incentives matter. 7
_______________

Read more of The Economist’s introduction to economics, for example this article on minimum wages, one on
government borrowing, and another on how economists think about culture. These and others are a part of our
Schools brief on economics.

More from The Economist reads:

Our Schumpeter columnist chooses the best books to understand the energy crunch
We recommend seven books on why Americans both love and loathe immigrants
Our Senior Economics writer suggests what to read on the history of capitalism
We recommend the five best books to understand AI

Share Reuse this content

https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2022/08/09/what-to-read-to-understand-how-economists-think?utm_medium=social-media.cont… 3/5
25/03/2023, 16:28 What to read to understand how economists think | The Economist

More from The Economist reads

What to read to understand banking crises

Seven books, and two films, for people curious about financial catastrophe

What to read about the Sunshine State

Six books that help put Florida’s surge in context

What to read to understand contemporary Egypt

Five recent books that help make sense of the Middle East’s most populous
country

Subscribe The Trust Project

Group subscriptions Help and contact us

Reuse our content

Keep updated

https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2022/08/09/what-to-read-to-understand-how-economists-think?utm_medium=social-media.cont… 4/5
25/03/2023, 16:28 What to read to understand how economists think | The Economist

Published since September 1843 to take part in “a severe contest

between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid
ignorance obstructing our progress.”

The Economist The Economist Group

About The Economist Group

Advertise Economist Intelligence
Press centre Economist Impact
Economist Events

Working Here
Economist Education Courses
Which MBA?
Executive Jobs

Executive Education Navigator

Terms of Use Privacy Cookie Policy Manage Cookies Accessibility Modern Slavery Statement Sitemap

California: Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2023. All rights reserved.

https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2022/08/09/what-to-read-to-understand-how-economists-think?utm_medium=social-media.cont… 5/5