Save Endangered Language
Save Endangered Language
Ten years ago Michael Krauss sent a shudder through the discipline of linguistics with his
prediction that half the 6,000 or so languages spoken in the world would cease to be
uttered within a century. Unless scientists and community leaders directed a worldwide
effort to stabilize the decline of local languages, he warned, nine-tenths of the linguistic
diversity of humankind would probably be doomed to extinction. Krauss’s prediction was
little more than an educated guess, but other respected linguists had been clanging out
similar alarms. Keneth L. Hale of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology noted in the
same journal issue that eight languages on which he had done fieldwork had since passed
into extinction. A 1990 survey in Australia found that 70 of the 90 surviving Aboriginal
languages were no longer used regularly by all age groups. The same was true for all but
20 of the 175 Native American languages spoken or remembered in the US., Krauss told a
congressional panel in 1992.
Many experts in the field mourn the loss of rare languages, for several reasons. To start,
there is scientific self-interest: some of the most basic questions in linguistics have to do
with the limits of human speech, which are far from fully explored. Many researchers would
like to know which structural elements of grammar and vocabulary – if any – are truly
universal and probably, therefore, hardwired into the human brain. Other scientists try to
reconstruct ancient migration patterns by comparing borrowed words that appear in
otherwise unrelated languages. In each of these cases, the wider the portfolio of languages
you study, the more likely you are to get the right answers.
Despite the near-constant buzz in linguistics about endangered languages over the past 10
years, the field has accomplished depressingly little. “You would think that there would be
some organized response to this dire situation,” some attempt to determine which language
can be saved and which should be documented before they disappear, says Sarah G.
Thomason, a linguist at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. “But there isn’t any such
effort organized in the profession. It is only recently that it has become fashionable enough
to work on endangered languages.” Six years ago, recalls Douglas H. Whalen of Yale
University, “when I asked linguists who were raising money to deal with these problems, I
mostly got blank stares.” So Whalen and a few other linguists founded the Endangered
Languages Fund. In the five years to 2001, they were able to collect only $80,000 for
research grants. A similar foundation in England, directed by Nicholas Ostler, has raised
just $8,000 since 1995.
But there are encouraging signs that the field has turned a corner. The Volkswagen
But the master-apprentice approach hasn’t caught on outside the U.S., and Hinton’s effort
is a drop in the sea. At least 440 languages have been reduced to a mere handful of
elders, according to the Ethnologue, a catalogue of languages produced by the Dallas-
based group SIL International that comes closest to global coverage. For the vast majority
of these languages, there is little or no record of their grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation
or use in daily life. Even if a language has been fully documented, all that remains once it
vanishes from active use is a fossil skeleton, a scattering of features that the scientist was
lucky and astute enough to capture. Linguists may be able to sketch an outline of the
forgotten language and fix its place on the evolutionary tree, but little more. “How did
people start conversations and talk to babies? How dis husbands and wives converse?”
Hinton asks. “Those are the first things you want to learn when you want to revitalize the
language.”
But there is as yet no discipline of “conservation linguistics,” as there is for biology. Almost
every strategy tried so far has succeeded in some places but failed in others, and there
seems to be no way to predict with certainty what will work where. Twenty years ago in
New Zealand, Maori speakers set up “language nests,” in which preschoolers were
immersed in the native language. Additional Maori-only classes were added as the children
progressed through elementary and secondary school. A similar approach was tried in
Hawaii, with some success – the number of native speakers has stabilized at 1,000 or so,
reports Joseph E. Grimes of SIL International, who is working on Oahu. Students can now
get instruction in Hawaiian all the way through university.
One factor that always seems to occur in the demise of a language is that the speakers
begin to have collective doubts about the usefulness of language loyalty. Once they start
regarding their own language as inferior to the majority language, people stop using it in all
situations. Kids pick up on the attitude and prefer the dominant language. In many cases,
Linguists agree that ultimately, the answer to the problem of language extinction is
multilingualism. Even uneducated people can learn several languages, as long as they
start as children. Indeed, most people in the world speak more than one tongue, and in
places such as Cameroon (279 languages), Papua New Guinea (823) and India (387) it is
common to speak three of four distinct languages and a dialect or two as well. Most
Americans and Canadians, to the west of Quebec, have a gut reaction that anyone
speaking another language in front of them is committing an immoral act. You get the same
reaction in Australia and Russia. It is no coincidence that these are the areas where
languages are disappearing the fastest. The first step in saving dying languages is to
persuade the world’s majorities to allow the minorities among them to speak with their own
voices.
Choose the correct heading for paragraphs A-H from the list below.
Write the correct number, i-xi, in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.
List of headings
1..................... Paragraph A
2..................... Paragraph B
Example: Paragraph C vi
3..................... Paragraph D
4..................... Paragraph E
5..................... Paragraph F
6..................... Paragraph G
7..................... Paragraph H
Questions 8-12
Use the information in the passage to match the people (listed A-F) with opinions or deeds
below.
Write the appropriate letters A-F in boxes 8-12 on your answer sheet.
Questions 13-14
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
13. What is the real result of a master-apprentice program sponsored by The Ford
Foundation?
14. What should the majority language speakers do according to the last paragraph?