0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views34 pages

Eumamu Hmputfcs,: Source of Acquisition

The document summarizes wind tunnel test results for a 0.065-scale model of the XRSSM-N-98 (Regulus II) guided missile. Key findings include: 1) Extending an antibuzz screen in front of the engine inlet caused a large positive change in pitching moment at zero lift. 2) Static directional stability was found to decrease markedly beyond 5.5 degrees angle of attack at all Mach numbers tested, with instability between 5.5 and 11 degrees. 3) Incorporation of ventral fins was predicted to maintain static directional stability to 11 degrees angle of attack.

Uploaded by

butterstick9131
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views34 pages

Eumamu Hmputfcs,: Source of Acquisition

The document summarizes wind tunnel test results for a 0.065-scale model of the XRSSM-N-98 (Regulus II) guided missile. Key findings include: 1) Extending an antibuzz screen in front of the engine inlet caused a large positive change in pitching moment at zero lift. 2) Static directional stability was found to decrease markedly beyond 5.5 degrees angle of attack at all Mach numbers tested, with instability between 5.5 and 11 degrees. 3) Incorporation of ventral fins was predicted to maintain static directional stability to 11 degrees angle of attack.

Uploaded by

butterstick9131
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Source of Acquisition

Eumamu of hmputfcs,
The @%a%%@ XongitudfnaX and l a t e r a l s%abfl.f%ycharaetefistics
of an 8.06g-sca$e model of %he XraSSM-B-9s (Regu3-us XI) sfdied abafabe
and 9 t s components have been aete-ned f o r a Web number range-of
1.6 t o 2,0 a t a Regmoltis number per foot of ~ , o x ~ Q ~ .

-
M%ssf%es Componen%sf n Coanbinat9on

M%srsfXes - Bpscff%@Types

Stability, bng5tudfnsl - Stst%@

S%abfbf%y,bte~"4%% - S%8tf~
Df rectf ona1
Cont~.o%,
for the

Bureau of Aeronautfcs, Department of t h e Navy

STATIC LOEGmmAL AND E A s STAB%L&TYCHARACTERISTICS OF AN


0,065-SCALE MODEL OF ?%iE C W C E VOUGT XRSSM-N-9a (REGuIBs 11)
MESSIm AT W H lVBlBERS FROM 1.6 TO 2.0
(TED PiO, EACA AD 3122)

An fnvestfgatfon has been conducted t o obtain the s t a t i c longitud9-


s an 0,065-scale model of
n a l and l a t e r a l s t a b f l f t y c h a r a c t e r % ~ t f cof
t h e XRSSM-N-9a ( ~ e g u l u s%I) guf ded m i ssf l e , Rudder effectiveness was
a l s o dete-ned. Data were obtafned a t Hach numbers of 1,6, 1.8, and
2.0, at a Reynolds number of 2,0~10" per foot.

Results of t h e fnvest%getPi.on $ndi@atet h a t a large positive change


i n t h e pitching moment a t zero b f f t w i l l be fncurred when an antibuzz
screen f s extended $n f r o n t of the engfne duet i n l e t . These posf%ive
moments a r e overcompensa%ed f o r by a s t n u h t e d free-floatfng canard
trimmer.

S t a t f c direc%fonal. s=pbfl.fty w a s found t o decrease markedly beyond


an angle of attack of 5,5 a t a l l Magh numbers tested, The missfle
becomes unstable between 5.5' and ll . Ineorpomtfon of v e n t r a l f i n s
w i l l mafntafn s t a t i c dfrectfonal s t a b i l % t y t o an angle of a t t a c k of llo0

The XRSSM-N-9 ( ~ e g u l u sII) gufded d s s f l e , i n t h e course of i t s


development, has been t h e subject of a number of wind-tunnel and f r e e -
f l f g h t fnvest%gat%ons, As a r e s u l t of these fnvestigatfons, a canard
trimmer w a s fncorporated ( r e f , P) t o eliminate t h e l a r g e negative
pftchfng moment a t zero l i f t whfch e f i s t e d with the o r i g i n a l conffgura-
tfon, In add%tfon, prevfous fnvestfga%%onshave considered t h e e f f e c t s
of mass-flow and boundary-layer bleed var%atfon, control effectiveness
( r e f . 21, and d p & c s t a b f l f t y ( r e f , 3),
Subsequent t o %he foregofng work t h e configuration w a s f u r t h e r
modfffed t o fneorporate a l a r. I n adajition, t h e
w%ngwas Xocated Y & r B & r k f C , 'thb" %rdi"t2cECL%a22 enlarged, ande the i n l e t
and ftasehge afterbody aodified,* The 'Batter changes were Ptlade t o
provide fnrpmved lon&tud%nal chnd directional stabfL%%ycharacteristics
and t o &ow greater flesrJlbflfty i n engine selection,

A% the reglues-bof the Bureau of Aemmutics, Departnent of the


Navy, an investimtion was conducted i n the Ames UnJttaq 9- by ?-foot
wind tunnel (ref, 4). '6he purpose of the investigation w a s t o dleterrdne
the s t a t i c longitudinal and directional s t a b i l i t y ~ h a r a ~ t e r f s t i cofs
the modf fied conf iguration QxRSSP?I-PJ-~~) of the miss% Xe, The r e s u l t s
of the investigation are reported herein. hcluded are the effects of
the canard t r, antfbuzz screen, ventral fins, rudder deflection,
and msss-flow ratfo througjh the engine duct.

Force and moment coefffcienta are referred t o the sUtabflityaxes,


with the exception of the base drag, which is referred t o the body axes,
Eiio~entsa r e taken about the point of intersection of the fuselage
reference ax%sand the projectfon of the leardfng edge of the wing mean-
geometric chord, Systems of axes and posit%ve direction of forces,
moments, and angles a r e shown i n figure 1,
Ab base area, sq f t
& i n l e t capture area, sq f t
b wing spano f t
-c mean geometric chord, f t
le%, free-stream Mesch nranber
a base presaare, lb/sq f t
p, free-stream s t a t i c pressure, l b / s q f %
pt t o t a l pressure, lb/sq f t

Q free-stream c preserupe, lb/sq f t

S t o t a l e n g area, sq f't
CL -
L i f t coefficient, MPL
sS
CD &a
drag coefff cient, 2
c-18

C~ base drag coefffclent,


gpm - %,)A,
QS
Cy sfde-force coefficient, afde force
ss
cn pitching-moment eoefffcfent,
¶=

Cn ;yaw&ng-mment coef ffcient,


¶a

Cmo pitching-moment coefffcient a t zero l f f t

m.c, aerodp@unfccenter, percent k

Cn13
r a t e of change of pwfng-moment coefficfent with efdeslfp angle,

----,
acn per deg
as
Czg
r a t e of change of rolling-moment coefffcfent wlth sfdesl%p angle,

C r a t e of change of yawing-moment coefffcfent wfth rudder de%"lection,


%R

-
m
m, duct mass-flow ratfo based on f n l e t capture area, A,
a angle of attack of fuselage reference axis, deg

$ angle of sfdeslip of fuselage refereace axfs, deg


6~ rudder deflection, deg

The model tested was an 0.065-scale model of the XRSSM-N-98


( ~ e g u ~ uIE)
s gufded d s s f l e furnf shed by the manufacturer, Chance Vou&t
Afrcraft, Xncorporated, Geometrfc charactePistfcs of the model are
l%eLed f n %able I, Pkbotograpkes of varr%orrst e s t conf$ga%ratfoassm e
shown i n ffgure 2, &ta%ls of the model and cornponerats arc, shown 3.n
ffgures 3 and 4,
The model was equgpped wf%h an %fa%s% and e n a n e duct* syc3Lem
$0 emb1e saubatfori of en@ne a i r f1ow through both a ma%n dact and
boundary-layer bleed duct, b t e m a l lfnes of the mafn duct were % m e
scale f o r a p p r o x m t e l y %hree dfetaneters behfnd the dwL l i p , m e
boundapkgp-layer bleed due$ was true scale except %ha%the center bleed
ebmnel, n o m X Q used f o r afr-@ond%%fo&ng purposes, was bled fnto
the main dluc$,

TEST PBOC

Pitch runs were made thmugP1 an angle-of-attack range f m ~ o m


-12' %o 4-12' a t zero angle of sfdeslPp. zaw javs were made through
an anglg-of-sidesL&p w e f f r m +2O t o -8 a t nomind an&. of" attack
of -5.5 OOs 4-5.5 and +LEO, Test data were taken a%Baeaclh ntlmbere
of' Lo$0, f ,80, and 2.00 a% a Reynolds number per foe% of' 2 0x9@,
Forces and mmen%swere measured by use of $ntemaXIy mounted,
six-eomponen%, slratn-gage! balance, Base etat%c preesme, balance-
ehmber sta%fc pressure, ~maslfn-duet s%&%&~ preeoure, and mfn-duet \

t o t a l pressure were o b t a h e d fmrn preeeure taps,


Corree%fons were a~~~,ll.%ed
t o both angle of" attack and angle of
s%desl%p%o tales acco'~~1-tof stream angle and stfng and balance deflee-
t%onunder lo&, mdder deflec%fon due t o load was not known; eaecor&nay,
no comec%fons were appL%ed, bng%%ud%ml-fommeasmemente were
@omec%edf o r base and balaee-ekambm drag by adgustfrq tihe local.
s%a%iepressure t o free-strekzaa s t a t f e pressure, and f o r buoyancy,
Precfefon of %he t e & rerauSbLs 2s fndfeated by %he nmber of
sfgflff%ewt fPga%raet o wbieh %he basic &&%aa r e presented f n table8 XI
and %$I,

Results of the prase& f e v e s % f ~ % f omn e shown fn the %om of


graphs, and %a%les, Plot8 of %he Xo~tuiefaaab-etabf1fty parme%ers%,
Cm Snd a.c., and the l a t e r a l ~ t s b f l i t yand s o n t m l parme%era, CPi
@ 2 g a and CxR, Ewe presen%ed f o r d%s@p%ss%on and $n%espre%a%%on,
few basfe-&&%apxots a r e fne1uaed only f o r %he purpose of % l f u s t r a t f ~
typ%esl varfetions of the Bongltudfnal ehnd l a t e r a l chwacterie%fca of
t h e basfe eonffgusatfon. The foregofng graphs and p l o t s a r e presented
f n ffgcares 5 "c&aroosghIl. The basic date. a r e presented i n t a b a l a r fom,
t h e pftch characterfstfcs i n t a b l e I% and t h e s i d e s l i p c h a r a c t e r f ~ t i c s
f n t a b l e I$$,

Basic mode%,- Typfcal L.ongftuiE%nalc h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the bas3e


cornfiguration a r e presented f n figure 5. The variations %naca%eda r e
representative of those obtained f o r t h e basic configuration ea$ a l l
three t e s t Mach numbers, X t all be noted t h a t the pitchhg-moment
curve f s nonXnear. CorresponCkingly, t h e a e r o d p w f c center would
undergo a s b f f t of approxhateby 0,2 percent of t h e man geometrfc
chord over the range of Xfft coefficients tested, Also shown f a f i g -
ure 5 a r e t h e r e s u l t s obtained f n reference 1 f o r a configwa%fon
s%anilwt o t h a t of the present t e s t , It should be noted t h a t t h e
model of reference 1 utfbized a more forward wing locatfon and had a
smaller trSmmer mounted a t a hf@er angle of incidencex than dfd the
present model,
.-
The variations with Mach
number of % and a.c, f o r t h e configurations t e s t e d a r e presented
%n ffgure 6 , A s u m a q of t h e r e s u l t s a t Mach number 2,O i s e v e n i n
t h e followfng tg;rbulat%on:

Basic
Bomdaq-layer bZesd closet3 .002 .1%
Tpfamner off
Trfmmer off, antibuzz screen extended
--,OX0
, 030
-24
Ventral f f n s on 0004 .%2

The tr$nrmer i s intended t o be free-floating during the $ e W r a l


maneuvey, 331 these t e s t s 2% w a s not f e a s i b l e t o f l o a t the tr&umer,
Accordfngly, the free-floating condfLion was simulated by removing %be
tr3amer e n t i r e l y . Furthemore, during t h e tePna%nal maneuver of the
Pnfssile the engine i s shut off a d the antPbuzz screen i s ex%snd.ed
( t o elbninate PLOWf nstabf l f t y w3thSn the engine duct) .
As fncUcated
by the preceding tabulation wndi figure 6, t h e removal of t h e tr-er
overcompensates f o r the positfve C,o s h i f t t h a t r e s u l t s when the

"We trfmmer of reference 1was mounted a t an a n g k of incic9ence


.> '
antibuzz sereen f s extended. This, jcoibined %;i t h ' a s u b s t a n t i a l rear-
ward s h i f t of t h e a,@, w i ll give"qufte l a r g e negative pitching momenta
during the terminal maneuver,

.-
The v a r i a t i o n with Reynolds number of
Cga, and a , @ . a r e shown f n f i g a r e 7, Reynolds number e f f e c t s a r e small
i n both cases.

Effect of mass flow,- The e f f e c t of mass-flow-ratio v a r i a t i o n


n -m
os% @ figure 8, X t Is evf dent t h a t changes f n mss-
flow rat90 cause s u b s t m t i a l changes in pftchfng moments, These changes
must be considered when analysis 9s made of t h e f U & t @ h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
of t h e missile dur%ng the various phases of i t s mission.

Basic model,- Ffdfuse 9 presents t y p i c a l l a t e r a l charact;erfstfcs


of t h e basic conffguration, The variatfons shown a r e representative
of" those occurrfng a t a l l three test Mach numbers f o r t h e basic
configuration,

-. The variatfon with Mach


t f o n s t e s t e d a r e presented
t /Mach number 2.0 a& a t an
angle of a t t a c k of 0' i s given i n t h e folMwfng tabulation:

Basic
V e r t % c d t a il o f f
Ventral f i n s on
Trimner o f f

As i n a c a t e d 'by t h e precedBng t;abu%at+on and figure 110, addition


of v e n t r a l f i n s t o t h e basic conffgwatioq r e s u l t s i n a large increase
i n CnS and a decrease f n C Z g e Tr3mxeri removal has negl9gible e f f e c t
an both Cng and C z g a t zero angle of atqack,

f o r t h e basic and trinrmer-off


.- B~dnfnat.fonof figure 10 b d f c a t e s t h a t
configurations, Cng decreases markedly
beyond an angle of attack of 5.5'. With -the cen-ker of g ~ a v i t ylocated
a t t h e leading edge of t h e mean a e r o d p W e chord, t h e missfle w i l l
become dfrectfomlXy unstable between ~LI angle of attack of 5.5' and 11°,
Addition of v e n t r a l f i n 8 s u b s t a n t i a l l y increases Cng9 maintaining
d i r e c t i o n a l s%abfa$tgr up through an angle of a t t a c k of l3.O,
Rudder effectiveness.- The varia%fon wfth Mach amber of f2
%373
- n
is presented i n figure 11. The basic t e s t data indieate that C, is
a linear flmctfon of &R over the range of Pudder deflectlorn tested.
1, Robinson, Ross I3,, and Driver, ComeLius: Effects of Various
Mod%fications on t h e S t a t i c b n g i t u d i n a l S t a b i l i t y and Control
Characteristics of a 0,065-Scale Mo61el of the Chance Vought
Regulus I1 B:ssi 1e a t a Mach Number of 2.01. !TED Eo, MACA
AD 398, NAQ! fib?[ SL55115, 1955.
2, Robinson, Rose B,, Drfver, Cornelius, and Spearman, M, Leroy:
Sta-kic b n g l t u d i n a l Elnd Lateral S t a b i l i t y and Control Charac-
t e r i s t f c s of an 0.065-sca1e Model of t h e Chance Vought R e p l u s
I1 Missile a t h c h EBwmbers of 1,41, lo61, and 2,01. TH)
No, NACA AD 398, NACA RM SL55E31, 1955,

30 Wineraan, Andrew Re: Some Flfght Data f o r the Chance %ugh$


Regulus 99 B : s TED fJb, NACA AD 398, M A RM SL36IX)2,
1956.
4. Bufiteberger, Ralph F o pand Parsons, John F, : The &sf gn oP
Large High-speed Wind Tunnele. A m , Fourth General Assembly
WWd-Tunnel Panel, Schevenf ngen, Netherlands, May 4, 1954.
Span. in. 15~63
.......................
. . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . O PO.00

Aspectratfo 2. 77
.....................O.
Taper r a t f o 0,60
Sweepback of quarter chord, deg
JXhedraP, deg
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.5
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .O. ........ . 00
Xncfdenceg deg
M r f o i l section, def f ned by:
-tc = 0.122496-0 .oa168$b0a8768($)~-? o r~33~96(h)+~.~15~~52 .

Root chord ( a t center i%ne). i n . . . . . . . . . . . . .


L

Tfpehord9 f n D . . . . . . . 4.27
Nem geometr%c &orit9 f n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 "18

.
Fuselage
Length. %no ....................... 44.53
Wfdtb (maf%mm basic d f m e t e r ) i n 3. 25
I ) e p t h P ~ h m fn.
Frontal area. sq in.
3 . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
5.05
$1.00
. . . . . . O . . O . .

.....................
FPnenessratio
Tertf c a l t a f l'
Total area ( t o center lfne) sq 3,n.
Exposed area. sg in.
Span ( t o center ~ n e ) .in.
ld.7Q

. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
27.08
15. 12
4. 48
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aspect r a a o
Taperrat20
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
1.53
0. 32
Sweepback of quarter chord. deg
M r f o f l section. same a s wfng
............. 45 * O
Root chord (at center l%ne)gin.
Tip chord. fn. . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
6027
2,10
Mean geomeLrf c chord. fn
Rudder
................. 4.53
&ea a f t of lhfnge Ifne. s q %no
Trmer
3. 22 .............
Total area ( t o Center Line). sq fn ............ 'j.40
Area exposed. sq in.
Span. fn .
. . . . . . ............ 2-h3
d087
......................
. . O O O . O O Q 1 . O O O . . O O O O O .

Plan form Trapezoid.ab


. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
A i r f o i l sectfon
Root chord (at center l%ne). $no
5-percent mod%fiedbfcoravex
2. 00
Tip cho~d. $no
Bciaenee. deg
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............. .. .. .. ~. .... .
0-85
6.o
Ventral ffns
&eae.xpossdjeach~sqfn. . 3.07
Span exposed. fn. .................... 1021
Angle wfth respect t o vertfco$ tga9.l. deg ........23. 0
Sweep of leezdfng e&ge9 deg ...............60.0
Due%
I n l e t area. sg fn.
&dtareap 1 9 ~ f n . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.
2-62
. . %*8l zG A
NACA RM S A 5 T 0 6
> ) , i ,
. ,
, . ,
> > '
>
'.?
, "
"
.
.
,
I
,
i
I
' .
') . $ ,
, ,,) .?.. > ,,

T A B U 11.- P I T C H CHARACTERISTICS; P: O.zO, €jR 0'

(a) Basic model (b) Boundary-layerbleed closed


M, = 1.60; R/ft = 2.0~10~ M, = 1.60; R/ft = 2.0xI08

2 CL Cm CD CY cn CZ + hb lt,zz CI, Cm
E, 9 Cn CZ m/% Cxb lP
$
=
-0.1 -0.02 0.012 0.032 -0.01 0.003 -0.031 0-@ 0.005 989 -0.1 -0.03 0.0180.031 -0.01 0.003 -0.001 0.
-.1
-el
-.02
-.03
.014
.016
.034
-033
-.01 .004 -.001 .85
0 .003 -.001 -71
.004
.005
984
986
-.1 -.03 .018 .033 -.01 .003 -.Om
-.1 -.& .020 -037 -.01 -003 -.001 .73 ,004 992
0.W
.004
9
w? .8
-.1 -.04 -021 .&3 0 .003 -.001 .58 .005 967 -.I -.& .023 -042 -.01 .003 -.W1 .57 .004 91
-12.9 -.68 .125 -165 -.Ol .003 -86 .006 992 -el -.03 -017 -030 -.01 -003 -.001 .86 .004 991
-10.7 -.57 .U .121 0 .002 0 .88 .M)6 993 -12.5 -.66 .124 .I60 0 .Wl 0 .83 .005 991
-8.8 -.47 .098 ,089 o .002 o .88 .W5 991 -12.5 -.66 .I24 .159 -.Ol .001 0 .83 .W5 991
-6.6 -.36 .077 .062 0 .002 -.ool .89 .005 991 -10.3 -.56 .11Jc .117 0 .001 0 .85 .006 991
-4.4 -.25 -0% .043 0 .002 -.001 .89 .005 992 -8.1 -.45 .099 ,082 0 .OOl -.003. -86 .W5 990
-2.2 -a13 -027 -033 0 -003 -.001 -89 .005 991 -5.9 -.34 -075 -057 -so1 .001 -.Wl -87 .005 990
-1.1 -a07 -017 -032 0 -003 -.001 -90 .005 991 -4.4 -26 -057 -043 "-01 -002 -a001 -86 -005 991
-a1 -so2 -012 .032 -.01 -003 -.001 .90 -005 991 -2.2 -A4 -034 .032 -a01 .003 -.001 .86 -005 992
1.0
2.1
4.3
-04
so9
-20
.007
.OM
-.010
-035 -.01 .004 -.001 .9l
.039 0
-056 0
-003 -.001 .90
-003 -.031 -91
.004
.004
-004
991
991
991
-1.2 -.08 .024 -030 -sol -003 -.031
0
1.0
-so3 -017 -031 -sol -003 -.Wl -87
.02 sol0 -033 -sol -003 -.Wl -88 -034 991
-67 -005 991
991 .&
6.5 -32 -.025 -082 0 -003 -.001 -93 LO4 991 2.1 -08 -005 -038 -so1 -003 -.001 -88 .CC4 991
8.7 .42 -.041 .ll5 0 -003 -.W1 -91 -004 991 4.3 -20 -.010 -055 0 .W2 -.001 .88 .004 991
10.9 -53 -.054 .I54 0 .002 0 -91 .005 991 7.2 -34 -.O3l .091 0 -002 -.001 .88 .004 991
19.1 -62 -.C56 -197 0 .001 0 -90 .005 991 9.4 -45 -.046 -127 0 -002 -.001 .87 .004 991
k = 1.80; R/ft = 2.0xl08 11.6 -55 -.057 A69 0 .001 -.001 -67 .004 991
13.8 -65 -so59 .a4 0 0 0 .86 .a5 990
0 0 .009 .026 -.01 -002 -.Om .98 .003 1057
0 -.01 -013 .M7 -.01 ~ 0 0 2 -.002 .93 1062 k = 1.80; R/ft = 2.OX1O8
.003
0 -.02 ,022 -034 -so1 -002 -.002 .77 -003 1059 0 -42 -019 .028 -.a' -001 -.001 .93 .002 1058
-10.8 -.51 .095 .U0 -.Ol -004 0 -93 .004 1057 0 -.02 -021 -029 0 -001 -.GO1 -89 -003 1057
-8.7 -a40 -072 .078 -.Ol -003 -.00l -94 -004 1057 -.1 -.03 ~024 -034 0 -.Wl -77 -003 1057
-6.5 -.29 ,055 .054 -.ox .002 -.om .95 .004 1057 -.l -.03 .028 .040 -.ol .ml -.@a .62 .003 1057
-4.3 -a19 -042 -037 -.01 -002 -.W1 .95 .004 1057 -12.4 -.59 .lo4 .I45 0 .002 0 .87 .003 1058
-2.2 -.lo .028 -029 -.01 .002 -.001 .95 .003 1057 -10.2 -A9 .092 .lo4 0 .003 0 -90 .004 1058
-1.1 -so5 -020 a028 -.01 -001 -.002 .97 .CO3 1057 -8.0 -a38 so74 -073 0 ,003 0 .92 .004 1058
0
1.1
2.2
0
-05
.lo 0
.011
.004
~029 -.01 -002 -.002 -98
-032 -.OX .001 -.We -97
.036 -.01 .002 -.002 -98
.003
-003
-003
1057
1057
1058
-5.8 -28 .060 -050 -so1 -002 -.001 -91 -004 1058
-2.2 -A2 .039 -028 -.01 -001 -.001 -91
-1.1 -.07 -029 -027 -sol -001 -.MI1 .92 -004 1058
1059 .&
4.3 -20 -.OX? ~053 -sol -002 -.Om -97 -003 1058 0 -so2 -020 -027 0 .001 -.W1 -93 .003 1058
6.5 .31 -a026 .077 -so1 .001 -.002 .98 -003 1059 1.2 -03 -031 -030 0 0 -.001 .94 .M)3 1058
8.7 -41 -a038 .lo9 -a01 0 -.002 -95 -003 1058 2.2 -08 -006 -034 0 0 -.a1 -93 -003 1058
10.9 -51 -.045 -145 -.Ol 0 -.002 -95 -003 1057 4.3 -18 -.006 -050 -sol .001 -.001 -95 -003 1058
131 -60 -.046 el85 0 -.Wl -.001 .95 .003 1057 7.2 -32 -.021r .083 0 0 -.001 .94 .003 1058
9.3 .42 -.036 -116 0 0 -.001 -93 -003 1058
M, = 2.00; it = 2.0~lo~
0 -01 -.005 ,032 0
-~~~~.002
ll.5
13.7
-51 -.a5 .154 0
.60 -.044 ~195 0 0
-001 -.001 .93 .003 1058
0
'
.92 .003 1058
0 .01 -.GO1 -032 0 -003 -.001 -99 -002 ll49 k = 2.00; R/ft = 2.0~10~
0 -.01 a009 .035 -.01 -003 -.Wl .81. .002 U49
0 -SO1 ,032 -041 0 .003 -.001 -63 .003 1149 0 0 -002 -031 -a01 so02 -.Wl .99 -003 1149
0 -01 -.005 .033 0 -002 -.001 1.00 -002 ll49 0 0 .004 -033 -a01 -003 -.I201 -97 -002 1149
0 0 -006 .034 0 .003 -.001 .9l -002 1148 0 -.01 -010 -037 -sol -003 -.001 .82 .002 U49
-13.0 -.59 ,092 .147 0 .oOl .95 .003 1.149 -.1 -.01 -012 .043 -SO1 -003 -.001 -66 .002 U49
-10.8 -.49 .079 .lo7 0 .002 .001 .99 .003 ll49 0 0 .001 -031 -.01 -003 -.001 1.00 -003 U49
-8.6 -.39 .064 .076 o .002 o 1.00 .w3 1149 -32.5 -.57 .091 .I42 0 .001 .001 .92 .we U51
-6.5 -.29 ,043 .054 0 .002 -.001 1.01 .a3 1149 -10.4 -.47 .077 -103 0 .002 0 .97 .002 1149
-4.3 -.l9 .022 .039 0 .002 -.001 1.00 .003 1149 -10.4 -.47 .076 -103 0 .002 0 .96 .002 ll48
-2.2 -.09 .006 .033 0 .002 -.Wl 1.00 .002 ll49 -8.2 -.37 .062 .072 0 .002 0 .97 .003 1148
-1.1 -.04 0 .032 0 .002 -.w1 1.00 .a2 u49 -6.0 -.27 .043 .052 0 .002 -.001 .97 .003 1149
0 .01 -.006 .033 0 .W2 -.001 1.01 .002 ll49 -4.3 -.l9 .029 -040 0 -002 -.Wl .97 -003 1149
.036 0 .002 -.001 1.00 .002 ll49 -2.2 -.09 .OX3 -032 -.01 .W2 -.001 .96 -003 U49
.041 0 .003 -.001 -99 .002 1149 -1.1 -.& -031 -.01 -002 -.001 -98 .002 ll49
.057 -.01 -003 -.001 .97 .W2 ll49 0 0 -002 -032 0 -002 -.001 .98 -002 ll49
.079 0 .a4 -.W1 .95 .002 ll48 1.1 .05 -.003 .033 -.01 .003 -.001 .99 -002 ll49
.lo7 0 .004 -.001 .96 .002 1148 2.2 .09 -.GO7 a038 -.01 .003 -a001 1.00 .OCe 1149
,139 0 .004 0 .95 .002 1148 4.3 .I9 -.Ol3 .051 0 .003 -.OOl -98 .002 1149
.I79 0 .a4 0 .96 .002 1148 6.9 .30 -.022 .074 -sol .W4 -.001 -98 -002 1149
.O32 0 .002 -.001 1.00
M, = 2.00; R/ft = 1.2~10~
.W2 ll49 - 9.1
11.3
.39 -.030 .lo2 0
.47 -.038 - .I38 0
-004 -.001 .99 .002 ll49
-004 -.001 .99 .002 1149
-
-002 -.001 1.01 .001 704 (c) Trimmer off
-002 -.001 1.00 -001 699
-002 -.001 1.00 .001 695 ha, = 1.60; R/ft = 2.0x10e
-003 -.OOl 1.02 -002 695
.oo3 - . ~ l 1.00 .002 697 -13.0 -.67 .184 .156 0 0 .OOl .8l .005 991
.oo3 o
& = 2.00; R/ft = 3.0x106
.99 .002 702 - -10.9
-8.7
-.57
-.47
.I56
-128
.ll6
-083
0
0
0
-001 0
0 .84
.86
.oo5
-005
988
993
* -6.5 -.36 -092 .059 0 -001 -SO01 -91 -005 995
1724 -4.4 -24 -052 -043 0 .W2 - . ~ 1 -90 -005 991
1727 -2.3 -.13 -014 .036 0 .002 -.Wl .go .005 991
1727 -1.2 -a08 -.002 -038 0 .002 -.W1 .90 .005 991
1726 -.I -.02 -.015 .&O 0 ,003 -.001 .90 .004 992
1725 1.0 .03 -.M7 -045 0 a003 -.C01 .93 -004 989

1 1 1 1 1 1 iii 1 1
2.1 .08 -.039 .051 -.01 -003 -.001 -91 .004 991
= 2.00; ~ / f t= 3.6~10~ 4.3 .19 -.063 .070 0 .002-,-.W1 .93 .004 991
-2.3 -.lo .on .031 o .COP -.oo1 099 .002 2108- 6.4 .087 O .OO1 O .92 .004 990
8.6 .37 -.072 .lo9 0 .002 0 .9l .005 992
-1.2 ::-06 --.008 : : 1.034 : :1
.002 -.001 -002 aO7
10.7
12.9
-46
.55
-.075
-.079
-138
.I71
0
0
-001 0
.002 0
-90
.g0
.004
.004
993
991
-.1 '-02 m.016 .040 -.01 .W3 -.001 -90 -005 991
2.3 .ll -.013 -040 -002 -.001
:%
-002 2106
NACA RM ~A57F06

TABLE 11. - PITCH c - Concluded

(d) Trimmer o f f , antibuzz screen. extended


M, ;= 1.60; ~ / f t= 2.0x106

Cm Cn m/nbo ptm
CL CD Cy C2 C ~ b lb/ft2
-0.1 -0.03 -0.003 0.052 -0.01 0.003 -0.001 0.70 0 1020
-.1 -.03 -.003 -051 -.01 -003 -SO01 -67 0 1024
-.1 -.03 0 .045 -.01 .003 -.001 -48 .004 1024
-.1 -.04 -001 -046 0 -003 -.001 .38 .003 1025
-6.6 -.36 -104 .070 0 .002 -.001 .39 .002 1026
-4.4 -.25 -069 ,052 0 .002 -.001 .39 ,002 1026
-2.3 -.14 .032 .044 o -002 -.oo1 .38 -002 1026
-1.2 -.09 -015 -044 0 .003 -.001 .38 .002 1026
-.1 -.04 0 .047 0 . a 3 -.001 .37 .001 1026
1.0 .02 -.012 .051 0 -003 -.Wl .38 .002 1026
2.1 .07 -.025 ,058 0 -003 -.W1 .38 .001 1027
4.2 .17 -.052 .077 0 .002 - . ~ 1.38 .mi 1027
6.4 .27 -.O64 -097 0 .W2 0 .40 .001 1027
10.7 .44 -.071 .149 o ,002 0 39 .oo1 1027
M, = 1.80; R/ft = 2 . 0 ~ 1 0 ~
-.1 -.02 0 .O44 0 .oO1 -.OO1 .59 -002 1058
-.1 -.03 .003 .043 0 .001 -.001 -49 -003 1058
- a 1 -.03 a007 -043 0 -001 -.001 .39 -003 1058
-10.7 -.48 -125 . U 8 0 .OO2 0 -39 -003 1057
-6.5 -.29 -078 ,064 O .OO2 0 .4O ,003 1057
-4.3 -.21 -061 ,048 0 .002 -.001 .40 .003 1058
-2.2 -.12 SO38 -040 O -001 - a 0 0 1 -41 -003 1057
-1.2 -.08 a023 -040 0 -001 -.001 -39 -003 1058
-.1 -.03 -009 -042 0 0 -.001 .39 .003 1057
1.0 .Ol -.004 .047 0 0 -.001 .39 .002 1058
2.0 -05 -a017 SO52 0 0 -.OOl .39 -002 1058
4.2 .14 -.045 .071 0 0 -.001 -38 .OW 1057
6.3 .23 -.064 -093 0 0 -a001 -37 -002 1057
10.7 -40 -.072 -143 0 ,001 0 37 .002 1058
& = 2.00; ri/ft = 2.0x106
0 0 -.013 .045 o .003 -.ml .56 .oo3 u49
0 0 -.013 .045 0 .003 -.001 .56 .003 U-48
0 0 -.011 .047 0 .003 .49 .003 1148
0 -.01 -.a9 .049 0 .003 - . ~ 1.40 ,003 1149
-10.7 -.44 -094 .u4 0 .OO1 -.001 .42 ,003 1150
-6.5 -.26 a052 -065 0 .002 0 .42 -004 ll50
-4.3 -.17 -029 ,052 0 .OW -.001 .42 -004 1149
-2.2 -.09 .011 .046 0 .OO2 -.OO1 .42 .004 U.49
-1.1 -.05 -002 -045 0 .002 -.001 .41 .004 ll49
-.1 -.ol -.a9 ,049 0 .003 - a n .40 .004 11.4.9
1.0 .03 -.019 -053 0 .003 -.001 .41 .004 1149
2.1 -07 -.028 -058 0 -003 -.001 -40 -003 ll49
4.2 .15 -.048 -073 0 .a3 -.Wl -38 -003 U49
6.3 .23 -.064 .093 0 .003 -.m1 .38 -003 U49
10.6 .38 -.O72 .I39 0 .003 -.001 .39 .003 ll49
( e ) Ventral f i n s on

M, = 2.00; ~ / f t= 2 . 0 ~ 1 0 ~
-10.8 -.49 .O88 .lo7 -.01 .003 0 101 .003 11.5.9
-6.5 -.29 .054 .053 -.ol .003 -.ool 1.02 .003 u59
-4.3 -.I9 -034 ,038 -a01 -003 -.OOl 1-01 .003 1159
-2.2 -.09 -016 -030 -so1 .003 -.001 1.00 -002 ll59
-1.1 -.04 .009 .030 -.01 .004 -.001 1.01 .002 1159
0 .01 .002 .031 -.01 .004 -.of11 1.01 .002 ll59
1.1 .05 -.003 -034 -so1 .004 -.001 1-00 -002 ll59
2.2 .10 -.010 .039 -a01 ,004 -99 -002 U59
4.3 .20 -.021 ,054 1 -005 -.001 .98 .002 ll59
6.5 .29 -.031 .076 -.ol .a05 -.ml .97 .002 1159
10.8 .46 -.054 ,137 -.01 .005 -.001 -96 -002 ll59
o .01 -.002 .031 -.01 .004 -.a1 1.00 .002 1159
NACA RM S A 5 7 F 0 6

( a ) Basic model; SR 20'

hb, = 1.60; a = 0" hb, = 1.80; a = -5.5'


B, CL Cm Cg CY Cn Pt" ' 1 CL Cm CD CY en CL m/%
Pt,
g
, cxb lb,rte
2.1 -0.02 0.015 0.032 -0.04 0.013 -0.010 0.93 0.004 992 212 -0.25 0.053 0.046 -0.04 0.009 -0.009 0.94 0.003 1057
1.1 -.02 .0I2 .033 -.02 .008 -.005 .@ .W4 991 1.2 -.25 .050 .045 -.M .005 -.005 .94 .GO3 1057
0 -.02 .0l2 .033 0 -002 0 -25 .049 .045 -.01 .W2 -.001 .94 -003 1057
-1.0 -.M .014 ,032 .02 -.003 .004 -25 -051 -045 .01 -.OOl .003 .95 .003 1057
-2.0 -.02 .017 .031 .04 -.008 .009 -25 .055 .045 .03 -.005 .007 .95 .003 1057
-4.0 -.03 .033 .028 .07 -.Ole .018 - .26 .068 .043 .07 - .013 .014 .93 .003 1057
-6.1 - .03 .056 .024 .I2 - .031 .026 -27 .090 .a0 .lo -.025 .022 .92 .003 1057
-8.1 -.Oh -088 -019 .16 -.043 -034 -28 .115 .037 .15 -.038 .029 .90 .004 1057
I& = 1.60; a = 5.5' M, = 1.80; a = -11'
2-2 -26 -.015 .068 -.04 -013 -.Oil .9l -004 991 2.3 -.51 .097 .113 -.03 .014 -.007 .90 ,004 1058
1.2 -26 -a018 -067 -.M .008 -.006 .91 .004 991 1.2 -.51 .095 .D -.02 .009 -.W3 .91 .W4 1058
.2 -26 -.019 .067 0 .003 -.W1 -91 .C04 991 .2 -.51 .095 .U2 0 .003 0 .92 .004 1057
-.8 2 6 -.Ole .067 -02 -.Wl -004 .9l .004 991 -.8 -.51 .097 .iU .02 -.W4 .003 .93 .004'1057
-1.8 -26 -.014 .066 .03 -.W5 .004
-38
-7.8
-26 0
-26 .054
.062
.051
-07 -.014
-16 -.037
.W9
.018
.032
.9l
.91
-90
.GO4
.005
991
991
991
-1.8
-3.9
-5.9
-.51
-.52
-.53
. l ~
.110
,117
.iU
.iU
.03 -.o10
.06 -.021
.D .11 -.036
\ 12: .MO
-91
.89
.83
.W4
.W4
.004
1057
1057
1057
-5.8, - 2 6 , .O2l, .057, .11,-.024 , .025, - 9 1 , .005, 991 -7.9, -.55, ,135, .iU. . 1 4 , - - 0 3 9 , . @ 4 , .79, .W5 , 1057
hb, = 1.60; a = 11' M, = 2.00; a = 0'
-2 .53 -.054 -154 -.Ol -002 -.Wl -91 .GO5 991 2.0 .02 ,001 .032 -.04 .007 -.WE 1.00 .002 1149
2.1 -53 -.Om -153 -.03 -.001 -.On -90 .W5 991 2.0 0 .004 .03i -.04 -007 -.008 1.00 -002 1149
1.1 -53 -.051 el53 -.02 -.003 -.007 -91 .005 991 1.0 0 0 .032 -.02 .004 -.004 1.00 .002 ll49
-.7 -53 -.054 a154 .Ol .007 .004 .9l .W5 991 0 0 -.OM .032 0 .OW 0 1.00 .002 11%
-1.6 .53 -.052 .I53 -02 .Oil a009 -91 .005 991 -1.0 0 -.OOl .032 .02 -.001 .004 1.00 .OW 1149
-3.6 -53 -.039 -150 -06 -.002 .016 .90 .005 991 -2.0 0 -003 .0+1 .03 -.W4 .007 .99 -002 1149
-5.6 -53 -.015 -143 -11 -a011 .M2 -93 .005 991 -4.1 -.a .02l ,027 .08 -.OlO .015 .99 .OM 1149
-7.6 .53 .O2l .134 .16* -026 .89 .005 -991 -6.2
-8.3
-.OX
-.02
.043
,070
.W
.OW
.12
.17
-.020
-.035
.OW
.028
.95
.93
.OM
.OM
1149
1149
M, = 1.60; a = -5.5'
-
.063
-
.052
- -.04
- .010
- -.010
--- = 2.00; a = 5.5'
.@ .w5 991
1.2 -.30 .061 .051 -.02 .006 -.006 .89 .006 991 2.0 .24 -.018 .062 -.04 .m8 -.009 .97 .002 1149
-2 -.30 -060 -052 0 .002 -.W1 .93 .005 991 1.0 .24 -.022 .062 -.02 .006 -.005 .97 .003 1149
-.8 -.30 -061 .052 .01 -.001 a003 -89 .005 991 0 .24 -.023 .063 0 .003 0 .97 -002 1149

$1
-1.8 -.31 -065 -052 .03 -.005 .007 -89 a005 991 -1.0 -24 -.021 .062 -02 -001 .004 .97 -002 1149
-3.8 -.31 -076 .049 .06 -.015 .016 -88 -005 991 - 1 .24 -.016 -060 .03 -.OW .008 .OM 1149
-5.9 -.32 -096 -047 .lO -.mi .M5 -67 .005 991 -3.9 .23 .OOl .On .07 -.W5 .016 1149
-5.9 .23 .029 .048 .12 -.017 -023 .W2
.OM 1149
hb, = 1.60; a = -11'
-7.9 -22 .062 -042 .18 -.M8 .028 .94 .OM 1149
2.2 -.58 .116 -125 -.03 .On -.GO7 .85 .005 9% = 2.00; a = 11'
1.2 -.58 .113 .l25 -.02 .007 -.W3 .67 .W5 991
.2 -.57 .113 .I24 0 .OM 0 -87 a005 993 1.9 .46 -.035 .I31 -.03 -002 -.008 .96 -003 U49
-.8 -.57 .U5 .I24 .01 -.003 .004 .% .005 993 1.0 .46 -.037 .131 -.02 .m -.m4 .97 .w3 1149
-1.8 -.58 .Ll8 -124 -02 -.007 so05
-3.9
-5.9
- .58
- .60
.l28
.I36
2 4
.125
.06
.lo
-
-
.020
.036
.007
.Ol5
.023
..&I
.87
& .w5
.006
993
991
990
-
.1
.g
-1.8
.46
.46
.46
-.038
- .036
-.034
.131
.131
.130
0
.02
.Od+
.oo7
.007
0
.005
.96
.96
.003
.003
.003
1149
1149
.03 .w9 .95 1149
-7.9 -.61 .150 .I23 -13 -.040 .028 .77 .006 993 -3.8 .46 -.016 .126 .08 o .016 .96 .w3 1149
-3.9 -.58 .127 -123 .05 -.019 -015 -84 .006 991 -5.7 -46 .Oil -118 .13 -.W6 .020 .94 .003 1149
-7.6 .46 .044 .ill .l9 -.013 .M2 .94 .003 1149
Mm = 1.80; a = 0' .1 -46 -.038 -131 0 .005 0 .96 -003 ll49
2.2 0 .016 -028 -.04 .009 -.OM. .97 .a3 1057 = 2.00; a = -5.5'
1.2 0 -012 -.02 -.W6 -003 N,,
.029 .W5 -97 1057
.2 0 .0U .029 -.01 .MI1 -.W2 .98 .W3 1057 2.0 -.24 -041 ' -043 -.04 .W9 -.W6 .99 .003 1150
-.8 0 .012 .029 .a -.m1 .oo3 .98 .w3 1057 2.0 -24 -041 .043 -.04 .OW -.w6 .98 .W2 1148
-1.8 0 .016 .028 .03 -.XI> .007 .97 .W3 1057 1.0 -.24 .038 .&3 -.M .005 -.003 1.00 .002 1148
-3.8 -.Ol .031 .025 .07 -.013 .016 .98 .003 1057 0 -.24 .038 .043 0 .W1 0 1.00 .002 1148
-5.8 -.02 .O52 .021 .ll -.023 .024 .96 .003 1057 -1.0 -.24 -040 -043 -02 -.003 -003 1.01 .003 1149
-7.9 -.M .078 .016 .16 -.038 .031 .94 .003 1057 -2.0 -24 .045 .043 .04 -.007 .006 .99 .002 1149
-4.0 -.25 .059 .041 .07 -.016 .OX .95 .003 ll49
I& = 1.80; a = 5.5' -6.0 -26 .080 .039 .12 -.M6 .018 .93 .003 1149
2.2 .o& -.04 .008 -.ou .003 1058 -8-1 -.28 ,102 -036 -16 -.037 -024 -91 -003 1149
.Z5
1.2
.2
-.8
25
-25
.25
-.016
-.Ole
-.016
.063
-063
-062
-.02
-.01
.005
.OOl
-01 -.002
-.006
-.001
-003
.97
-97
.98
.003
.003
.003
1058
1058
1057
;1;: 12 :zi o'16

2.00;
-::g -:g: l:E
a = -11'
:z: Ez:
hb, =
-1.8 -25 -.013 -061 .03 -.006 -008 -97 .003 1057
-3.8 .24 .004 .056 .07 - .012 .017 .97 .003 1058 2.1 -.49 .083 .lo7 -.04 .015 - .006 .97 .w3 1149'
-5.8 .24 .a8 .050 .11 -.022 .024 .95 .w3 1.057 1.1 -.48 .082 .lo6 -.02 .008 -.002 1.00 ,003 1149
-7.8 .24 .062 .044 .16 -.034 .031 .94 .003 1057 -1.0 -.49 -084 .lo5 -02 -.007 -005 -99 '.003 1149
-2.0 -.49 .087 .lo5 -04 -.014 .W8 .99 .W3 Ll49
I& = 1 . 8 ; a = 11' -4.1 -.49 .094 -106 -08 -.M6 .013 .91 .003 1149
'018 '%
2.1
1.1
.50
.50
-.038
-.040
.I42
.I42
-.04 0
-.02 -.003 -.a6
-.OlO .94
.94
.003
-003
1057
1057
1;:
O
1;:
-'49
?:: :%: O'I2
'lo4
.16 -.040
'Oo2
.021 .81
'Ool '99
'003
.003
'O03
1149
1149
1149
.2 .50 -,042 -,01 0 -.002 -94 1057 O -'49 'Io5 'w2 '001 "01 'Oo3
-.7 .50 -.042 .142 .01 .004 .003 .95 .003 1057
"@ 1149
-1.7 -50 -.040 .I41 .02 -007 -008 -94 -003 1057
-3.6 .50 -.027 .I38 .07 -.m3 .014 .94 .003 1057
-5.6 -50 -.004 -132 .11 -.Oil .020 -94 .003 1057
-7.5 .50 -032 .124 .17 -.a -024 -93 -003 1057
NACA RM SA57~06

-
TABLE 111. SIDESLIP CHARACTERISTICS; R/FT = -
2 . 0 ~ 1 0 ~Continued
- .
* , >

TABU3 111.- SIDESLIP CHARACTERISTICS; R/FT = 2 . 0 ~ 1 0 ~ Concluded -


( e ) Rudder deflected; a = 0'

& = 1.60; 6, = -4O M, = 1.80; 6~ = -8'

L D' * .C m/% C ~ b l:%t2


@>

dcg
CL C, CD CY Cn ct m/obo cxb Pt,
lb/ft2
2.3 -0.02 0.013 0.033 -0.05 0 . a - 0 . m 0.90 0.004 993 2.1 -0.01 0.018 0.029 -0.04 0.018 -0.010 0.98 0.003 1055
1.3 -.M -012 .034 -.03 .015 -.W6 .90 -004 984 - 3 -.01 .014 .029 -.Ol .OU -.002 .98 .003 1056
.3 -.02 .010 -033 -.01 .010 -so02 -90 .005 989 -.9 -.01 .016 -029 .Ol .006 .003 .98 .003 1057
-.7 -.02 .012 -033 .Ol .004 -003 .90 -004 989 -1.9 -.Ol .020 .028 -03 .003 .008 .97 .003 1057
-I.@ -.02 .015 -032 -03 -.001 -008 -90 -005 991 -3.9 -.02 -037 a024 .07 -.005 .016 .97 .003 1057
-3.8 -.02 -029 .029 .07 -.010 .016 -90 -004 992 -6.0 -.02 -059 .020 -11 -.016 .024 .95 .003 1057
-5.8 -.03 .OX, .024 -11 -.OU .025 .90 -005 991 -8.0 -.03 .086 .016 .16 -.030 .031 .94 .003 1057
-7.9 -.09 .078 -020 -15 -.035 -032 -90 .W5 992 % = 1.80; 6~ = -12'
& = 1.60; 6~ = -8' . 2.2 -.01 -018 -031 -.05 ,024 -.Oil .003 1087
.99
2.2 -.02 .014 .034 -.05 .025 -.010 .gO .005 9% 1.2 -.Ol .OX6 -030 -.03 .020 -.OO6 -97 .003 1092
1.2 -.02 .OX? .035 -.03 -019 -.006 .90 -004 9% -4 -.01 .014 .030 -.01 dl7 -.002 -98 .003 1087
-3 -.02 .0U -035 -.Ol .014 -.002 -90 -004 990 -.8 -.01 .017 .030 .Ol :0Z -003 .98 .003 1090
-.9 -.02 .014 -834 -01 -008 .004 -90 -004 991 -1.9 -.Ol -022 a029 .03 .009 .008 -98 ,003 1090
-1.9 -.02 -017 .033 -03 .003 -008 -90 -004 991 -3.9 -.02 ,039 -025 .07 .001 .016 -97 .003 1090
-3.9 -.02 .033 .030 .07 -.007 .017 -90 -004 991 -5.9 -.02 -061 -02l e l l -.On a024 -96 .003 1088
-6.0 -.03 .054 .025 11 0 .025 .gO .004 991 -8.0 -.03 .087 .016 .16 -.024 ,031 .94 .003 1088
----
-8.0- -.03 .083, .On J.6-.031 .032 -90 -004 991 .4 -.Ol -014 .029 -.Ol .018 -.003 -97 .003 1091
% = 1.60; 6, = -12" M, = 2.00; SR = -4O
-.02 .020 .034 -.05 .O32 -.OU .004 loo0 0 .001
--
2.3 .90 2.3 0
-31- .013 ll48
1.2 -.02 -017 -034 -.03 -027 -.007 -90 -004 1006 1.3 0 -.003 .031 -.03 .OlO -.005 1-00 -002 U47
-4 -so2 .016 .034 -.Ol -022 -.a .90 .004 993 .3 0 -.005 .032 -.Ol .007 -.001 1.00 .OOZ 1143
-.8 -.02 .Ol9 .033 -01 .016 .003 -90 -004 992 -.8 0 -.003 -031 -01 .003 -003 1.00 .OW 1149
-1.8 -.02 .@3 .032 -03 .010 .008 -90 ,004 992 -1.7 0 .001 -031 .03 ,001 .006 1.01 .002 ll51
-3.9 -.03 .039 -029 -07 -.W1 -017 .90 .W4 991 -3.7 -a01 -016 -026 .07 -.005 .013 .99 -002 1150
-5.9 -.03 .062 -025 -.012 -025 -90 -004 991 -5.7 -.Ol -036 .022 .lo -.OX? -019 -96 -002 1150
-8.0 -.04 -090 -019 el5 -.025 -032 .90 -004 991 -7.8 -.02 -063 -016 -16 -.026 .026 .94 .OM 1149
& = 1.80; 6, = -4' M, = 2.00; 611 = -8'

2.3 -.01 .016 -027 -.05 a015 -.Oil .97 a003 1054 -3 .01 -.003 -033 -.Ol .OU -.002 1.01 .002 1149
1.3 -.01 .a3 .028 -.03 .on
-.006 .98 .003 1052 -.9 .01 -.ow .033 .ol .oo7 .003 1.01 .ow 1149
-3 0 -0ll -028 -.Ol -007 -.001 -98 -003 1055 -1.9 -01 .003 .031 .03 .004 .006 1.01 .002 1149
-.8 -.01 -013 -027 .Ol ~004 -003 .003 1056 0 a019 .027
-1.8
-3.8
-.01
-so1
.017
-033
.027
-025
.03
.07
0
-.007
.W7
.016
-98
.97
-97
.003
.003
1054
1054
-3.9
-5.9
-7.9
-sol
-.02
.041
.067
-023
.017
.
-07 -.002
0
.16 -.024
.013
.020
.026
.99
.97
.98
-002
.002
.002
1149
ll49
1149
-5.8 -.02 .054 .020 .U -.018 .024 .95 .003 1055
-7.9 -.02 .Om .015 -16 -a032 -031 .94 .003 1055 = 2.00; 6~ = -12O
2.2 -.01 .003 -034 -.05 .022 -.010 1.01 .001 ll55
1.2 -.01 0 -033 -a03 .Ol9 -.006 1.01 .a1 1157
-3 0 -em2 .033 -.01 .016 -.OW 1-01 .OW ll43
-a9 0 -001 .033 -01 .OX? -002 1.01 .001 1141
-1.9 -.01 .005 -031 .03 -009 -006 1.02 -002 ll47
-3.9 -.01 .a .027 .07 .002 -013 1.00 .002 1149
-5.9 -a02 -043 a023 -11 -a007 .WO 1.01 .002 1151
-7.9 -.03 .070 -017 -16 -.020 -026 .95 .002 ll52
Ffpz-e 1,- Systems of mces am3 poeitfve dfrectfon of forces, momentss,
and angles,
-
Ff@re 2, Node1 photographs,
, t i o n with v e n t r a l firas,
(a) &sic eonf igura%ion. (b) CoaPff gura-

F%gaare 2,- Conclutied, (e) 3hXe-t wf* espptibaazz screen esgteniied,


(d) h l e t wi%h b o u u d e a ~ - h p rbleed closed,
Figure -
3. Model and model eomonent d e t a i l s (dkaensions i n incpes).
(a) Three vfewe of b8sf c conff guratfon,

Figure 3,

Hmpe
- C O ~ % ~ Y ~ Z P (b)
3,- Gonc1uded.
B ? ~ Tr3xme.r
. and
an t r d detaiabs.
( c ) Amt%bnzz s c m e n i m d rudder d e t a f l s ,

Figure Xdet conff g ~ ~ r a t f o n e ,(a) Bssf c i n l e t , (b) Inlet at41


b o a n d q - h y e r bleed closed, ( c ) I n l e t wf%h antibuzz screen
exten&d,
Figure 5,- bnng%tudfnaleharacterfs%fcs of t h e basic configures$fon;
& = 2,0, ~ / f =
t 2,0xi0',

Figure 6.- VarfatSon with Mach nlrmber of pitching moment a t zero lif"g,
aand s e r o d p m fc center f o r %]he conf igurettions tested; ~ / f t = 2 , 0 ~ 1 0

Figure 7,- 'Varfatfon w%th Reyao3.a~number of pitching moment a t zero


%if%,and aero e center; %=2,0,
-
Ffgux-e 8 , Effect of maes-i10w-ratio varf a,%$on on pf %chirag momen%;
~/ft=2,0~10', @]e~O,
Figrare 9,- Lateral ehmaetePgstSes of the basfe configuration;
,
%=2,0, ~ / f t = 2 , 0 ~ 1 0 ' cr;;Q ,
Figure 10.= V'ax%k%i,on wlth Mach rimer of' mlling-moment and gawlng-
moment derf vatf ves f o r %be eonf f guz-at5ons tezs%ed; ~/9%=2,
Oxlod,
(a) cxrClO.

Figure 10, - CsneWed, (d) ~r.=-5,5~,


Ffgure U,-TBP8rfaLiora. with Mach amber of" rudder effeetfveness;
,
R/f%=2,o x w a=oO, p=oO,
Relative Wind

Figure 1.- Systems of axes and positive direction of forces, moments, and angles.
NACA RM SA37~06

(a) Basic configuration.

(b) Configuration with ventral fins. A-21874

Figure 2.- Model photographs.


NACA RM ~ ~ 3 ~ 0 6

( c ) I n l e t with antibuzz s c r e e n extended. A-21885

( d ) I n l e t with boundary-layer bleed c l o s e d . A-21881

Figure 2.- Concluded.


NACA RM ~ ~ 5 7 ~ 0 6 C0 ~BFIIIFJV
IATY
2 ' i.
NACA RM SA57F06
NACA RM ~ A 5 7 ~ 0 6
I I

NACA RM SA57~06 CG~TFI~IW!PU,L


-

L~

( a ) Basic i n l e t .

( b ) I n l e t with boundary-layer b l e e d closed.

( c ) I n l e t with antibuzz screen extended.

Figure 4.- I n l e t c o n f i g u r a t i o n s .
Figure 5.- Longitudinal c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the b a s i c c a n f i g u r a t i m ; MCO=2.0,
~/ft=2. 0>(106.
NACA RM ~ ~ 5 7 ~ 0 6 33RTDSNT LKL
,___C- Basic configuration
~
-0
- Boundary -layer bleed closed
,
-
G
- Trimmer off, antibuzz screen extended
Ventral f i n s on
( p o i n t s taken from f a i r e d curves)

cmo

Figure 6.- Variation with Mach number of pitching moment a t zero l i f t ,


and aerodynamic center f o r ons t e s t e d ; ~ / f t = 2 . 0 ~ 1 0 ~ .
Figure 7.- Variation with Reynolds nmber of pitching moment a t zero l i f t , and aerodynamic
center; Mp2.0.
Figure 8. - E f f e c t of mass -flow-ratio v a r i a t i o n on p i t c h i n g moment ; ~ / f t = 20Klo6,
. CLz 0.
B
Figure 9.- Lateral characteristics of the basic configuration; &=2.0,
~ / f
M,
(a) a=oO
Figure 10.- Variation with Mach number of rolling-moment and yawing-
moment ddrivatives for the configurations tested; ~/ft=2.0xlO6.
%
( c ) a;ll1°
Firmre 1 0 . - Concluded.
NACA RM

You might also like