Study Slides Example
Study Slides Example
• Foundational principles
are altruistic in nature.
• Focus on leaders’ self awareness.
• Responds to followers’ needs.
• Embodies practices that emphasize caring, nurturing and
enrichment of the individual lives of followers.
• Focuses on consensus of all.
• Timelines not crucial.
• Not effective for today’s healthcare environment.
• More appropriate for stable environment, in which evolutionary
development can take place.
Transformational Leadership:
• Meets internal and external demands of fast paced healthcare
environment.
• Used by ANCC to achieve excellence in healthcare services.
• Concerns regarding critical review of the model & assessment of
instruments commonly used to measure TL (MLQ, Global Inventory,
Kouzes, and Posners LPI).
Personal Altruism
Transparency
Integrity
Moral Shared
Self Relational
Ethical Decision Caring
Awareness Integrality
Courage Making
Work Life/Engagement
• Intrinsically motivated
• Personal insight
• Self regulating from belief system.
• Have a vision
• Listens to inner compass even
when under pressure.
• Passionate
• Know what the right thing is to do.
• Resilience
• Confidence
Relational Integrality Shared Decision Making
• Open communications.
• Open to ideas of others.
• Share experiences acknowledge
weaknesses and strengths. • Makes informed decisions based on
input from others and with an ethical
• Honest consideration for self and others.
• Trustworthy
• Respectful
Caring
• Compassionate
• Empathetic
• Participant sample:
Expert Panel included19 Masters/Doctoral RNs with nurse executive experience.
Pilot (n=20).
Full Scale testing (n=309) included RNs providing ≥ 50% patient care.
Instruments:
• Demographic Form.
• Authentic Nurse Leadership Questionnaire (ANLQ)
• Area Work-life Scale (AWS)
• Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ)
• Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES)
Data Analysis: Descriptive, inferential, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling.
Sample Demographics:
• Mean age = 47.4 (2.6 years younger than ANA survey and slightly
older than HRSA analysis of Nursing workforce).
• Female gender = 95.4% Male gender = 4.6% males
(9% lower that RN population according to ANA)
• 31.4% worked in Magnet®-designated hospital.
• 6% board certified.
• (No significant findings regarding demographics, other than board
certification in surgery and pediatrics was identified.)
Educational Degrees
12%
22% Assoc.
BSN
MSN
57%
Methodology:
• Process used in Instrument Development:
• Polit & Beck’s Steps of Developing Multi-Item Scale.
• COSMIN Study Taxonomy of Measurement Properties
for Evaluating Health Instruments (Mokkink, et al., 2010)
Steps:
Conceptualizing the construct.
Developing item pool.
Deciding scaling/scoring methods.
Evaluating wording features, readability.
Expert review of content validity.
Pilot Testing
Full Scale testing
Test-retest reliability week 3 after baseline data completion
Study Aim One:
• Examine content validity through panel of experts.
• 6 questions dropped.
• Final questionnaire had 29 items.
Study Aim Two:
• Evaluate internal consistency and test-retest.
• Reliability of the developed questionnaire measuring perceived
authentic leadership in staff nurses.
• Full Study:
• Positive correlation between the initial ANLQ and
• re-test ANLQ (r =.888, p < .001)
• Significant positive relationship between all subscales
• (all p < .05)
• Cronbach's alpha coefficients were .984 for the 29-item scale
(n=185) and ICC for test-retest reliability is .937 (n=129) Power = .99
• Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranged from .87 to .99 for all
subscales, and ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from .874 to
.926, power > .88
Study Aim Three:
• Evaluate construct validity through exploratory factor
analysis and confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis
testing.
• Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA):
• Analysis of 29 item ANLQ.
• 185 completed questionnaires (no missing data identified).
• Principle Axis Factoring with Promax rotation used to analyze the
first order structure of 3 factor and 5 factor solution.
(The rotated factor loading matrix supported the theoretical item pf
questionnaire.)
● Looked at percentage of variance explained by each model.
● Examined how well EFA matched conceptual framework.
● Looked at overlap (decide whether to keep or move).
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA):
• Model comparison determined that the first order 3 factor and
first order 5 factor model were not the best fit.
• The second order structure model was the best of the
three models.
• Examined different type of model fit, indices include: absolute,
relative and parsimony fit. The values met indicated good
model fit.
• Examined relationship among subscales and entire scale.
(Research Questions # 2-3)
• Results show co-variance among subscales and three domains
indicate they are complex and not independent.
• Looked at weight and co-efficient and the contribution of each subscale.
Subscale of self-awareness is a little lower than .9 in comparison to
all other subscales. Future studies needed to explore if consistent.
CFA: Estimated Model for Second Order
Structure
Findings:
• Significant relationship between perceived authentic
leadership and nurse engagement, as measured by UWES.
• In particular, the moral-ethical courage subscale.
• ANLQ was significant predictor of nurse engagement as
measured by the UWES (12.5% variance).
• Engage in authentic presence and listen carefully to foster follower trust, which
leads to engagement.
Recommendations:
• Include Authentic Leadership in Nursing Education at all
levels of Nursing curriculum and demonstrate in daily
Nursing Practice from bedside to boardroom.
• Contact Information:
• [email protected]