Computer System Validation A Review
Computer System Validation A Review
Volume 7 Issue 2, March-April 2023 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
INTRODUCTION
Computer System Validation and provides an manufacturing facilities spending more time
overview of CSV methodologies and a road map of documenting than testing. Traditional CSV
the deliverables used in the CSV process on methodologies can see manufacturers spending up to
pharmaceutical IT Companies. As computer systems 80% of their time documenting processes, and only
are diverse, depending upon size of management 20% of time testing the efficacy of the solutions.
system, novelty, complexibility and business impact,
Computer System Validation:
the deliverables may be scaled up or down Validations of computer systems that manage
accordingly. The CSV process discussed in this
processes, organize systems, collect analytical data,
whitepaper is based on the GAMP 5 framework, as it and carry out analytical test procedures. Computer
provides an excellent and rapid approach for CSV
system validation includes the qualification of all
which, when followed, they ensure your software & hardware of quality management system,
computerized systems are fit for purpose, will meet
which has impact (Directly/Indirect) on the quality of
the needs of your business, and are compliant with a product. The purpose of the validation process is to
current regulations. The Life Science industry has a
provide a high degree of assurance that a specific
strong legacy of Validating Computer Systems process will consistently produce a product (control
thoroughly. However, the traditional ‘test everything information or data) which meets predetermined
approach’ has become outdated and leaves GMP specifications and quality attributes.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD55108 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 2 | March-April 2023 Page 711
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD55108 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 2 | March-April 2023 Page 712
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Computer System Validation Process:
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD55108 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 2 | March-April 2023 Page 713
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD55108 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 2 | March-April 2023 Page 714
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Cares About Computer System Validation: [2] CFR, 21 CFR, Part 211: Current Good
Resources involved in any way with IT, computer Manufacturing Practice for Finished
or automated systems is affected: Pharmaceuticals, sections 21 I. 22: Proposed
Developers Rules, vol. 61.Federal Register, pp., 1996;
Maintainers 20104-20115.
Users [3] Sharon Strause ―Computer System
Regulatory Authorities Validation—Definition and Requirementsǁ
QA
Originally published in the spring 2009 issue of
Future of Computer System Validation: Journal of Validation Technology, pp-1-5
These regulatory agencies require CSV processes to
[4] Products, Document PH 1/97 (Rev. 3), PIC/S
confirm the accuracy and integrity of data in
Secretariat, 9-11 Rue de Varem be, CH-1211
computerized systems in order to ensure product
Geneva 20
safety and effectiveness.
[5] Dr. Sohan S. Chitlange, Dr. pravin D.
1. Develop Clear and Precise Functional and Chaudhari, Mr. ajinath E. Shirsath, Dr.
User Requirements - One of the biggest
Jaiprakash N. Sangshetti, ―pharmaceutical
mistakes companies make when starting an
validationǁ first edition, suyog publication and
informatics project is to not do the strategic distributors pvt.Ltd. 8.1-8.11
planning necessary to ensure success.
[6] Kaner, Cem, Falk, Jack, Nguyen, Hung Quoc,
2. Perform risk-based CSV - CSV takes a lot of
Testing Computer Software, New York: John
time and IT resources to accomplish, so it is wise Wiley & Sons; 1999.
to follow a flexible approach that utilizes a risk-
based assessment on the system to determine [7] Potdar M.A, cGMP for Pharmaceuticals,
required test cases and the optimal level of testing Pharmaceutical Validation, 3rd edition, Nirali
for each. prakashan, Pune, 437 – 450.
3. Good Validation Plan - Like any technical [8] FDA, draft of Guidance for the Industry: 21
endeavor, CSV processes should be guided by a CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic
good plan that is created before the project starts. Signatures: Glossary of Terms, August 2001.
CONCLUSION [9] FDA CDRH, General Principles of Software
Computer system validation is an important part of Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and
confirming the accuracy and integrity of your data, FDA Staff, January 2002.
along with ensuring product safety and effectiveness. [10] Giridhar A, Hamdan I, Joglekar G,
Effective, risk-based validation of computerized Venkatasubramanian V, Reklaitis GV, Real-
systems is also an important part of maintaining time process management in particulate and
regulatory compliance. Inefficient or ineffective CSV pharmaceutical systems, Computer Aided
processes prevents projects from being delivered on Chemical Engineering, 2011; 29:1035–1039.
time and within budget and may also result in
regulatory action that can be legally and financially [11] Ludwig Huber,’ Analytical Instrument
devastating to an organization. Validation Master Qualification and System Validation’, Agilent
Plan defines computerized system validation strategy. Technologies, 2009, Publication Number 5990-
System Assessment represents the actual 3288EN, pp-40-44.
documentation quality status of the system. [12] Bedson P, Sargent M, The development and
REFERENCES application of guidance on equipment
[1] Andreas Hoffmann, Jacqueline IGihny- qualification of analytical instruments,
Simonius, Marcel Plattner, Vanja Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 1996;
SchmidliVckovski, Christian Kronseder, 1(6):265-274.
―Computer system validation: An overview of [13] Robert Nash and Alfred Wachter, Marcel
official requirements and standardsǁ, Decker, Pharmaceutical Process Validation, 3rd
Pharmaceutics Acta Helvetiae., 1998; 72: 317- Ed. Edited by, 2003, pp.507-509
325.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD55108 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 2 | March-April 2023 Page 715