Unit 7
Unit 7
Semantics:
Semantic roles
and lexical relations
Table of contents
Scheme 3
Key ideas 4
7.1. How to study this unit? 4
7.2. Introduction to semantics 4
7.3. Semantic meaning 6
7.4. Semantic features 9
7.5. Semantic roles 10
7.6. Lexical relations: Synonymy, antonymy,
homophones and homonyms, polysemy, word play,
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
metonymy, collocation 12
7.7. Bibliographical references 20
7.8. Master class 21
In Depth 22
Test 255
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Semantic meaning
Semantic features
Semantic roles
Syntax Semantic roles
and lexical relations
Clause combination
Unit 7. Scheme
3
Key ideas
Kreidler, C. W. (2002). Introducing English Semantics. London & New York: Routledge.
(pp. 100-110). Available at the virtual campus under the art. 32.4 of the Spanish
Intellectual Property Law.
I
n this unit we will define and describe the concepts of semantic features and
semantic roles and the way they can be used in the process of semantic analysis.
Particular attention will be given to lexical relations.
T
he origins of formal semantics are widely related to the works in the field of
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
1. Capture for any language the nature of the meaning of words, phrases and sentences
and explain the nature of the relation between them.
2. Be able to predict the ambiguities in the expressions of a language.
3. Characterise and explain the systematic meaning relations between the words, the
phrases and the sentences of a language.
4. Provide an account of the relation between linguistic expressions and the things they
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
I
n general terms, three disciplines are concerned with the study of meaning:
philosophy, psychology, and linguistics. Diverse approaches to meaning have
been developed within the field of logic and philosophy of language. One of the
main aims of semantics is to analyse word meaning and explain how words and their
meanings combine to make sentences and how the meanings of these words
influence the sentential meaning. The interpretation of complex combinations might
eventually lead to the need to involve also discourse and discourse analysis.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
In his influential work The Study of Language (1985, fourth edition 2010), George Yule
provides the following definition of semantics and its focus on meaning:
Yule distinguishes between conceptual meaning and associative meaning. For him,
“conceptual meaning covers those basic, essential components of meaning that are
conveyed by the literal use of a word” (2010, p. 113). He gives the word needle as an
example.
Needle: a small thin piece of steel that you use for sewing, with a point at one end
and a hole for the thread at the other.
The word needle can also be associated to “pain”, “illness”, “blood”, “drugs”, “hard
to find”, etc., which are examples of the term associative meaning (Yule, 2010, p.
113).
knowledge. Murfee.
Andy Murfee knows how to drive an
automobile.
Table 1. Aspects of speaker’s semantic knowledge. Source: adapted from Kreidler, 1998, p. 9-12.
L
inguists are interested in the speaker’s knowledge of the meaning of words
and sentences. Semantic studies are also interested in our ability to explain
the meaning of words and hence the meaning of every utterance we produce.
To understand the essence of the concept of semantic feature, we should turn to the
aspects of speaker’s semantic knowledge, as described in Table 1, and in particular
to the sixth aspect. Kreidler claims that “the common element of meaning, shared by
all but one word [. . .] is a semantic feature” (1998, p. 11, bold in original).
For Yule “the study of basic conceptual meaning might be helpful [. . . ] as a means
of accounting for the ‘oddness’ we experience when we read sentences such as the
following
The hamburger ate the boy.
The table listens to the radio.” (2010, p. 113).
These sentences are syntactically correct, but semantically wrong. The components
of the conceptual meaning of the word hamburger prevent the word from being the
subject of the verb eat. Yule describes part of the meaning of the words in these
sentences as either having (+) or not having (-) a particular feature.
animate - + - -
human - + - -
adult - - - -
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
T
here is an ongoing debate on the extent to which there is a direct
correspondence between syntactic structures and semantic meaning and
role. For instance, the sentences A cat is driving a Ferrari or A Ferrari is
driving a cat are syntactically correct, but semantically wrong. If we analyse the
correspondence between syntactic functions and semantic roles, we will see that the
assumed correspondence between subject (syntactic function) and agent (semantic
role) does not always apply. For example, in Peter wrote a letter, Peter is the subject
(syntactic function) and the agent (semantic role). If we passivise the direct object
letter, the resulting sentence will be: A letter was written by Peter. In it, A letter is the
subject (syntactic function) and Peter is the agent (semantic role), i.e. the syntactic
function subject does not correspond to the semantic role agent like in the first
version of the sentence.
There isn’t a universal agreement among linguists on the definition of semantic roles.
The number of semantic roles and the terminology used vary depending on the
school of thought. In this section, we draw on Yule’s definition of semantic role as
“the part played by a noun phrase, such as agent, in the event described by the
sentence” (2010, p. 294) and his classification and understanding of the different
types of semantic roles.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Examples:
L
anguage is a complex system of signs that people use to communicate. It was
Ferdinand de Saussure in his Course in General Linguistics, based on the notes
taken from his lectures and published posthumously in 1916 by his students
Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, who first discussed the sign character of the
language. Saussure’s theory of the sign is based on a two-part model: a signifier and
the signified. Daniel Chandler gives the following example to illustrate Saussure’s
theory: “the word ‘open’ (when it is invested with meaning by someone who
encounters it on a shop doorway) is a sign consisting of:
• a signifier: the word ‘open’;
• a signified concept: that the shop is open for business” (2007, p. 15)
The signifier is often used to mean “standing for” the signified. The arbitrariness of
the relation between the linguistic sign and the object it “stands for” can be proved
by the fact that there are different strings of sounds (words) for the same extra-
linguistic object: escuela (Spanish), school (English), schule (German), école (French).
Another example of the same phenomenon is polysemy. For example:
hand: the part of the body at the end of the arm, including the fingers and thumb.
hand: a person who does physical work on a farm or in a factory (Oxford Dictionary
online).
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
The relational aspect of a word is important as its meaning depends on its association
with other words. In what follows, we examine a number of phenomena that show
Synonymy
To start with, we should bear in mind that synonyms are not words that have the
same meaning. There may be some exceptions of words that mean exactly the same,
but these cases are rare. Synonyms are words that have different shades of the same
basic meaning.
smell scent
A property of a
thing that makes it
perceptible to the
olfactory sense
odour aroma
Figure 2. Synonyms.
Examples:
Antonyms are words that belong to the same grammatical category (nouns, verbs,
adjectives, etc.) and are opposed in meaning.
Examples:
big - small
old - new
in - out
here - there
As a word can have several meanings, it can also have several antonyms, i.e. each
meaning has its own antonyms.
Example:
Homonyms are words which are different in meaning, but identical in form.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Table 4. Homophones.
Homographs are words that have the same spelling, but different pronunciation.
Perfect homonyms are those that coincide in both spelling and pronunciation, but
differ in meaning.
1. going or being a long way down from the top or surface, or being of a particular
distance from the top to the bottom.
2. very strongly felt or experienced and usually lasting a long time.
3. (of a sound) low.
4. showing or needing serious thought, or not easy to understand.
5. If something is deep, it has a large distance between its edges, especially between
its front and back edges.
6. (of a colour) strong and dark.
Kreidler explores some difficulties related to polysemy and homonymy and claims
that “lexicographers and semanticists sometimes have to decide whether a form with
a wide range of meanings is an instance of polysemy or of homonymy” and adds that
dictionaries recognize the distinction between the two “by making a polysemous item
in a single dictionary entry and making homophonous lexemes two or more separate
entries” (1998, p. 52). His examples for this way of distinguishing between the two
phenomena in dictionaries are the words head – one entry and bank – two entries.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Figure 3. The word head in Diccionario manual Vox-Harrap’s (1991), Barcelona: Bibliograf SA.
The figure below shows how a number of connotations stick to the basic meaning,
for instance, of the word head, and some connotations are themselves the centre
(basic meaning) for other connotations, thus forming another cluster.
2a 2
3
1
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
5 4
5a
The basis of metonymy is the contiguity of two entities. Unlike the relationship of
similarity that motivates metaphor, metonymy does not imply inherent association
between the entities. From a linguistic perspective, in metonymy one word stands
for another or one word is substituted by another on the basis of association.
Collocations are word combinations that occur frequently. They are readily available
expressions and learners of English as a foreign language often find them difficult to
use.
a heavy schedule
to hit a record
to make a decision
salt and pepper
bang on time
break a habit
catch a cold
a chilly reception
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics. The Basics. London & New York: Routledge.
The master class defines basic concepts and ideas in the field of semantics. It starts
with a brief overview of what semantics studies and its relation to syntax within the
field of linguistics. It also provides definitions of semantic meaning, semantic
features, and semantic roles and a variety of examples to illustrate how they relate.
The last part of the master class focuses on lexical relations in the system of language
and how they reflect the cultural and cognitive diversity of the world we live in.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Agustín Vicente and Ingrid Falkum describe the main characteristics of polysemy.
They argue that although polysemy is relevant for compositional semantics and for
the semantics-pragmatics divide, it hasn’t received enough attention. They examine
some of the questions that linguists have been concerned with and provide a brief
history of theories related to polysemy. The authors also define and delimit the
different types of polysemy.
Access to the document through the virtual campus or following this link:
http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/a
crefore-9780199384655-e-325
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Guan, J. (2009). The Cognitive Nature of Metonymy and its Implication for English
Vocabulary Teaching. English Language Teaching 2 (4), 179-183.
In this article, Jialing Guan focuses on the cognitive nature of metonymy. The author
explores the meaning extension and lexical conversion of vocabulary from the
perspective of metonymy. Understanding the metonymic motivation of a word opens
up new possibilities for teaching vocabulary creatively.
This short video looks at “meaning”, and in particular the meaning of words. It also
shows how semantics, semiotics, and logic deal with this issue. The video provides
simple definitions of some basic concepts, such as: sign, context, and nonverbal
communication, and points to the importance of studying semantics.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Access to the video through the virtual campus or the following website address:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZDkp8dUWyw
Access to the article through the virtual campus under the article 32.4 of the
Spanish Intellectual Property Law
This website provides definitions of some basic concepts semantics deals with. The
authors give examples of “semantic features” and explore several ways in which
words are semantically related to other words. The authors also give some essential
information about pragmatics and discourse analysis. To sum up, it is a short
introduction to basic semantics.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
Access to the webpage through the virtual campus or following this link:
http://www.linguisticsnetwork.com/more-on-semantics/
2. If we assume that in the pair of sentences: (a). Victoria is Jim’s teacher and (b). Jim
is Victoria’s student the first sentence is true, the second sentence is:
A. True.
B. False.
C. The truth of the first sentence does not determine the truth of the second.
4. Choose the correct answer. Box in box of matches and box in He has boxed against
the world boxing champion
A. are homonyms.
B. are two different meanings of the same word (synonymy).
C. Both A and B are correct.
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
5. Indentify the semantic roles in the sentence I saw Turner’s “The Slave Ship” in
Boston.
A. Turner’s “The Slave Ship” is the theme.
B. Boston is the goal.
C. Both A and B are correct.
9. In the sentence I am going by the 8.30, i.e. by the train which leaves at 8.30, the
use of the hour for the train is
A. Collocation.
B. Metonymy.
C. Synonymy.
10. Choose the correct answer. The expressions hard-earned money, make
© Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)