Russian Formation of Words
Russian Formation of Words
Townsend
PRINCETON UNIVERSIТY
RUSSIAN
WORD-FORMATION
ABBREVIATIONS
-т -ен -н
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
Resonants НУ (НУ) О Obstruents И All othe1·s
PAST ACТIVE
PARТICIPIAL El'П>ING:
-ший -вший
1
1 1 1 1
Obstruents (НУ) Р All others
CONSONANT
MUTATION:
и Е
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
First Past Imperfecti \·е First Past Imperfective
singular passive derivation singular passive derivation
present participle present participle (rarely)
(rarely)
RUSSIAN
WORD-FORMATION
in word formation. Section II, which deals with verbs, will Ье of the most inter-
est to linguists and is the most rigorously handled and self-contained of the sec-
tions. It first presents conjugation in terms of а one-stem system, including an
excursus on verbal stress, and gives an inventory ofverbs Ьу type which includes
almost all verbs from unproductive types; it then treats verbal (including
aspectual) derivation in detail. Section 111 treats nouns, with particular emphasis
on deverbative nouns, and Section IV deals with adjectives. The book includes
а detailed tаЫе of contents, and particular attention is invited to the ComЬined
Subject lndex and Glossary at the back ofthe book, which includes or gives text
references to many explanations of linguistic terms and notations, including
references to the general definitions given in the beginning of Section 1. Also in-
cluded in the back for ready reference are а Root List, an Index of Nominal
Suffixes, and an Index of Adjectival Suffixes. The book also contains various
taЫes and trees.
This book neither pretends to nor intends an exhaustive delineation of all
aspects of Russian derivational morphology. Description of stress, for example,
is almost exclusively limited to conjugation and verbal derivation (Section 11).
With regard to linguistic approach in general, certain simplifications and nor-
malizations have been made in the exposition and format in the interests of
making both as accessiЫe as possiЬ\e. For instance, once the spelling system and
the basics of morphophonemics have been explained in the beginning, the
Russian alphabet is used almost exclusively, and in many of the descriptions,
particularly in Sections 111 and IV, а number of details that would Ье necessary
for а full linguistic description are omitted as unnecessary for а general under-
standing. Economy of description is, of course, employed where redundancy
would undermine а principle or а rule, but in general the terseness characteristic
of many linguistic descriptions is avoided in favor of elaboration and some
repetition, where this seems in the interests of learning or emphasis. Finally, the
notation that is used is kept as simple as possiЫe and is explained both in а
separate subsection in Section I and, in many cases, as it is introduced.
The approach to derivational analysis in Section I and in the book in gen-
eral is frankly semantic, and openly semantic criteria are applied to form the
bridge between the synchronic and etymologica\ \evels in Russian. А certain
mixing of these \evels cannot, of course, Ье a\together avoided in any discussion
of derivation, nor should it Ье in all cases, but in the author's opinion certain
limits must Ье drawn, and the ,vlюlesale use of older systems and smuggled-in
etymologica\ information begs the question of а modern description. The solu-
tions and systems presented in this work are suggestive rather than final, and
PREFACE ix
there are competent persons at work in this relatively new field who will have
much to contribute. This book will have served some purpose if it сап engage
the attention of scholars and students who might otherwise limit themselves to
the more trodden paths of phonology and morphology.
А few words should Ье said about the great benefit ofteaching word-forma-
tion to students learning Russian. Though it is almost uniformly ignored in
Russian textbooks and in most descriptions, and is almost always inadequately
treated in those (mostly Soviet) grammars that do treat it (except for В. О.
Unbegaun's Russian Grammar, whose full and useful, if quite traditional, des-
cription of word formation was of great help to me), there are few languages
in which the study of word formation is more necessary and more rewarding
than Russian. For the student who has learned how to decline and conjugate,
continuing the study of Russian is largely а matter of learning vast numbers of
new words which do not become more familiar, the more sophisticated they be-
come, as, for example, in French. Rather, the task oflearning all these words ad
hoc often discourages students from going оп with Russian after one or two
years. The author has found, through several years ofteaching parts ofthis book
to second- and third-year classes at Harvard and Princeton, that the systematic
study of the structure of words and their analysis into their component parts
helps students learn vocabulary efficiently and enjoyaЫy. Word recall among
these students has been demonstrated to Ье far higher than among students who
have not studied word-formation. For the graduate student or teacher who has
studied Russian for several years, and for the native speaker of Russian who has
never studied his own language formally, the systematic study of words will also
Ье new or, if not entirely new, will help to organize information and insights he
already has about Russian words into а practical system he сап use or teach.
The classification of suffixes in Sections 111 and IV and some of the general
organization of these sections is more or less generally based оп traditional
Soviet models, specifically, Е. М. Galkina-Fedoruk, Sovremennyj russkij jazyk,
and statements оп productivity in general follow this work and the three-volume
Academy Grammar. However, the exposition and general treatment do not at all
follow these models, which are rigidiy traditional, though useful for inforшation
al purposes.
All the subsections of the book contain exercises of various types. ln Sec-
tions I and II the exercises are designed to help the user achieve mastery of the
materials in those sections. The exercises in Sections 111 and IV are mostly dic-
tionary exercises drilling various suffixes in the same order in which they are giv(:n
in the exposition. Persons who know Russian quite well тау use these exercises
Х PREFACE
as а passive check оп what they have read, while the intermediate or advanced
student of Russian will need to use the dictionary in most cases. The dictionaries
recommended for these drills are А. 1. Smirnickij, Russko-angliskij s/ovar', latest
edition availaЫe, and the four-volume Academy Dictionary, Slovar' russkogo
jazyka, 1957-1961.
This book owes а great deal to many of my friends and colleagues and to
the interest and alertness of many of my students who have used its various
parts, and it is my pleasant duty to thank all of these people for many construc-
tive suggestions. The one-stem verb system, of course, originated with my teacher
Roman Jakobson of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (in his Ьу now famous article in Word, December, 1948), but the
present version owes many of its important innovations to Alexander Lipson of
Cornell University, who was, as far as I know, the first to teach а one-stem sys-
tem successfully to students. Other friends and colleagues who read the manu-
script and offered much helpful advice were Michael Shapiro of the University
of California at Los Angeles, Charles GribЫe of Brandeis University, and
Robert Rothstein of Harvard University, who suggested а physical layout for
my description of verbal stress. Igor Berukshtis of Princeton, New Jersey, and
recently of Moscow, checked the style levels and usage of most of my examples
(usage, where indicated, generally follows the four-volume Academy Dictionary,
S/01:ar' russkogo jazyka).
In the last few months Mrs. Sophie Bargman of Princeton University
read the entire manuscript and offered many helpful comments. А great debt of
gratitude is also due Alex Zarechnak of Princeton University, who typed most
ofthe manuscript in final form, whose patience and accuracy were а constant
boon, and whose vigilance caught many errors and misprints.
Lastly, my warm thanks go to Horace G. Lunt of Harvard University, who
gave constant help and encouragement throughout the years of the book's
development and whose teachings and materials originally suggested to me the
importance of derivational morphology.
Charles Е. Townsend
CONTENTS
with links
Preface vii
BiЫiography xvii
Abbreviations xviii
SECTION I. GENERAL
xi
xii CONTENTS
D Analysis of words 26
1 Principles of division, 26
2 Analyzing words of foreign origin, 27
Н Vowel alternations 52
Church Slavonicisms 54
Alternations involving vowels in comblnation with р and л, 55; Russian pleo-
phonic vs. Church Slavonic nonpleophonic variants, 55; Russian РОТ-, ЛОТ
vs. Church Slavonic РАТ, ЛАТ in initial position, 57
2 Russian ё vs. Church Slavonic с, 57
3 Russian, ч, ж vs. Church Slavonic щ, жд alternating ,vith т, д, 58; Russian ч, ж
vs. Church Slavoпic щ, жд, and other alternations in verbs in -т11ть, -д1пь, 58;
Other ч, ж vs. щ, жд alternations, 59
4 Churcl1 Slavonic prefixes, 59
CONTENTS ХШ
PREFIXATION 149
SUFFIXATJON 151
G Nouns built with suffixes not creating new independent words 196
1 Diminutive suffixes, 196; Suffixes including к, 197; Suffixes including ц, 197;
Enlarged diminutive suffixes, 198; Diminutives which lose their force, 199
2 Augmentative suffixes, 200
COMBINATION 201
А Coordination 201
В Subordination 201
1 Elements joined directly, 201
2 Elements joined Ьу а connecting vowel, о, 202
3 Compound abbreviated words, 206
CONTENTS XV
PREПXATION 212
Dawson, Clayton Leroy, The derivationa/ suffixes of the Russian substantive; а syn-
chronic study, unpuЫished thesis, Harvard University, 1954.
Galkina-Fёdoruk, Е. М., Sovremennyj russkij jazyk, Moscow, 1958.
Isacenko, А. V., Grammaticeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s s/ovackim, Mor-
foligija 11, Bratislava, 1960.
Isacenko, А. V., Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, Halle, 1962.
Jakobson, Roman, "Russian Conjugation," Word, vol. 4, по. 5, December 1948.
Klagstad, Harold Leonard, Vowel-zero alternations in contemporary standard Russian,
unpuЫished thesis, Harvard University, 1954.
Levin, Ephraim Matthias, The derivationa/ suffixes of the Russian adjective; а syn-
chronic study, unpuЫished thesis, Harvard University, 1957.
Sanskij, N. М., Ocerki ро russkomu s/ovoobrazovaniju i leksikologii, Moscow, 1959.
Unbegaun, В. О., Russian Grammar, London, 1960.
Ward, Dennis, Тlze Russian Language Today, Chicago, 1965.
REFERENCE WORKS
Bielfeldt,Н. Н., Rйckliiujiges W orterbuch der russischen Sprache der Gegemi·art, Berlin,
1958.
Grammatika russkogo jazyka, vol. 1, Akademija nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1960.
S/ovar' russkogo jazyka, vols. 1-4, Akademija nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1957-1961.
S/ovar' sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka, vols. 1-17, Moscow-Leningrad,
1950--1965.
Smirnickij, А. 1., Russko-anglijskij s/ovar', Moscow, 1965.
Viismer, Мах, Russisc/1es Etymologisches Worterbuc/1, Heidelberg, 1953-1958.
XVII
ABBREVIA TIONS
The study of Russian, Iike that of most modern foreign Ianguages, concentrates
оп declension and conjugation; that is, оп the analysis of words into stems plus
inflectional endings. But most students of Russian will have noticed that many
stems are further analyzaЫe; that, in addition to а root, they may contain pre-
.fixes (preceding the root) and/or derivational suffixes (between root and ending).
Derivational suffixes are also called formants. 1 The study of suffixes and pre-
fixes and their comЬination with roots is called word-formation or deriL'ation.
Word-formation cannot Ье studied efficiently or correctly without some
discussion of the basic sounds of Russian and, particularly, of how the spelling
system portrays these sounds. In order to do this, and also for the purpose of
providing а first acquaintance with certain terms which will Ье used later on, we
will begin with some definitions, first general, then more specific ones pertaining
to the Russian sound system. Linguistic terms not defined here are given in the
Index and Glossary at the back of the book. The definitions here should Ье read
through now and used for later reference as well, as the terms and concepts be-
come more meaningful.
1 We wil\ use the term "suffix" to designate а derivational suffix only, not an ending.
2 SECTION 1: GENERAL
2 Sounds
In this book Russian basic sounds and words or parts of words transcribed
into basic sounds are represented Ьу Latin letters in italics (rather than enclosed
in slashes, as is customary in phonemic and morphophonemic transcription).
Phonetic transcription of Russian sounds and words is in Latin letters enclosed
in brackets. For example, "Вода 'water' begins with basic sound v and its tran-
scription in basic sounds is voda. The phonetic transcription is [vada]." 2
1 The term "morphology" is sometimes used to refer to the study of inflection only.
2 More information regarding symbols and notation is given оп рр. 5-6.
LINGUISТIC TERMINOLOGY AND NOTATION 3
BASIC SOUNDS or MORPHOPHONEMES (or MORPHONEMES) are distinctive sounds
which can independently distinguish meaning and are nonpre-
dictaЫe in terms of their environment. (Phonemes are similar to
morphophonemes, except that they are more predictaЫe in
terms of environment and give less information about the mor-
phology of Russian than morphophonemes; hence we work
with morphophonemes.) Basic sounds are divided into:
RESONANTS Not much obstruction of air stream. The Russian resonants are:
r, r', 1 /, /', п, п', т, m',j; v and v' have resonantal qualities and
act as resonants in derivation. Resonants are also distinguished
Ьу their Iack of voiced-voiceless opposition; they are always
voiced in Russian. (Note that v and v' once again play an inter-
mediate role: they are opposed to voiceless f and f', but differ
from obstruents in that consonants preceding them may Ье dis-
AND tinguished as to voiced-voiceless.)
OBSTRUENТS Quite а Ьit of obstruction of air stream. But unlike resonants,
obstruents may Ье, and most of them are, opposed as to voiced-
voiceless (see YOICED·YOICELESS below). Obstruents may Ье fur-
ther divided on the basis of type of obstruction: stop (t), frica-
tive (s), and affricate (с), but the division is not useful gram-
matically and may Ье disregarded.
Russian consonants are divided, according to their place of
articulation, into:
PALATALS Tongue touching or near middle of the roof of the mouth (hard
palate):
Obstruents: z, s, с, sc
Resonant: j
Note that it is important not to confuse palatal consonants with
palatalized consonants. The former have а single, palatal articu-
lation; the latter have а primary nonpalatal and а secondary
palatal articulation. (Cf. below under HARD-SOFТ and PAIRED-
UNPAIRED.)
The obstruent palatals (z, s, с, sc) are often grouped together and
called нusНINGS (щипящие). Hushings are important in grammar
and word-formation, because they frequently (and, historically,
almost always) imply mutation from а nonhushing consonant.
VELARS Back of the tongue touching or near the soft palate (the soft
area behind the hard palate):
Obstruents: g, (g'), k, k', х, (х')
VOICED-VOICELESS
3 Notation
Henceforth when we wish to call attention to the structure of а word, we
shall use hyphens to separate its parts: prefix(es)-root-suffix(es)-ending: рыб-ак,
стар-оват-ый, по-мбг-ут. Roots are in lowercase Cyrillic when given in words
but in uppercase when given separately; for example, the root in рыб-ак is РЫБ.
Normal Russian spelling is retained except in certain cases when the sound jot
plus а vowel may Ье expressed Ьу й plus the vowel symbol variant following hard
paired consonants (e.g. красн-ей-у, rather than красн-е-ю, мой-ут, rather than
мб-ют); cf. pages 11-12. In addition, we shall use the following symbols to denote
vowel-zero alternations at the injlectional /е1:е/ (vowel-zero alternations are dis-
cussed fully оп pages 60-80): we shall use а slash (/) to indicate the presence
of zero and enclose the (moЬile) vowel in the vowel-zero alternation within ta·o
s/ashes: 1
тетрад-/к-а тетрад-/о/к
д/е/нь д/н-я:
1 We shall use this notation consistently throughout the book for atternations in nouns,
adjectives, and pronouns; in the case of verbs we shall use it when we are considering voy,•el-
zero alternations as such, or when we list а verb as а type, but elsewhere the notation may Ье
omitted. 1.е. б/р-а-ть, б/е/р-у or бр-а-ть, бер-у.
6 SECTION 1: GENERAL
А "greater than" sign ( >) means "becomes, goes to"; for example,
д > ж before fi.rst singular present ending -и in И verbs.
А "less than" sign ( <) means "comes from"; for example, in вожу, ж < д
before first singular present ending -и in И verbs.
Finally, we shall use the asterisk (*) to designate а word or form not extant
in modern standard Russian, but whose previous existence is presumed on the
basis of modern knowledge of the history of Russian, of analogous words or
forms extant in the language, and so on. In addition, we may also use the aster-
isk to designate any hypothetical word or form. For example:
All Russian words which take а stress, including monosyllaЬic words, are
marked with the usual "acute" stress mark, with the following important ex-
ception: Russian verbal "basic forms," which are discussed in Section 11, page
82, have their own special stress notation, which is described in the Excursus
on Verbal Stress (pages 90-96) and used from that point on through the rest
of the book. The basic forms are infinitives or third plural present forms; they
may or may not contain а stress mark, may contain а stress mark over а conso-
nant, а prefix, and so on. If such forms are encountered before the system is
learned, the stress notation may simply Ье ignored.
EXERCISE Break down the following words into: prefix(es) + root + suffix(es) +
ending. Designate zero-endings Ьу #. (Write out this exercise in Russian letters,
but at boundaries involvingjot show what the actual division is.)
When one learns the Russian alphabet and how to read Russian words, one
encounters certain proЫems in the relation between Russian letters and the
sounds they represent. Not all these proЫems are satisfactorily solved or con-
fronted in basic courses. Let us reexamine some points which are particularly
important in analysis of words.
8 SECTION 1: GENERAL
or, in the case of unpaired consonants (ж, ш, ч, щ, ц, й), upon spelling rules
already known; for example,
after ш only и, never ы
after ч only а, never я
One can easily see that the endings are the same; it is simply а matter of
which letters are used after the preceding consonants. The same principle holds
for the derivational suffixes. For example:
ADJECТIVAL SUFFIX -ov-
gaz-ov-oj1 газовый adj from газ'gas'
pol'-ov-oj полевой adj from поле 'field'
boj-ov-oj боевой adj from бой 'battle'
ing is -ый or -ий outside of stress. This is one of the few examples in Russian of phonetic rather
than morphophonemic (basic sound) spelling (assuming the pronunciation [-у}]).
ТНЕ RUSSIAN SPELLING SYSTEM AND WORD-FORMATION 9
With one or two exceptions, we shall use the Russian alphabet for both
suffixes and endings. But one should Ье prepared for the vowel spelling variant
not given, if the requirements of spelling so dictate. Thus, for the adjectival
suffix just listed we give -ов-, rather than -ов- (-ев-), and expect one to recognize
that the suffix will Ье spelled ев after the appropriate consonants. Or, to give
another example, we give the adjectival suffix -ап- as -ян-, because paired con-
sonants occur soft before it, but if а final root consonant is а hushing (ж, ш, ч,
щ), the suffix is spelled -ан-:
but
кожа leather кожаный
The basic vowel о is spelled о after hard paired consonants and after hush-
ings in stressed position in grammatical endings and in some stems. Elsewhere,
it is spelled е. We already know that а spelled е in unstressed position тау
emerge as ё when it receives the stress. In word analysis it is both useful and cor-
rect to regard the е as having represented а basic о in the first place. For example,
весна has а basic о, since the stress shift in the plural gives вёсны. Стена, on the
other hand, has а basic е since the stem-stressed nominative plural accusative
singular gives стены - стену. Such an е which represents а basic о тау Ье
marked ё (вёсна, нёсут), the actual stressed ё being marked Ъу the usual diaere-
sis (вёсны, нёс).
In relatively rare instances, ~ stressed о тау alternate with а stressed е in
the same root or, very rarely, in the same paradigm:
жёна - жёны but женСЮiЙ
вёдут - вёл but ведший
From now on we shall use ё when we want to call attention to а basic о in а root,
formant, or ending. In the Root List at the back of the book roots which ever
occur with а stressed ё are marked Ё; for example, НЁС, ЖЁН.
EXERCJSE Locate basic n in the following words and clarify each case:
звезда море подстрижен
стекло знаешь переночевать
привезут музеем кусочек
Before а vowel it is rendered Ьу the same vowel letter which follows soft paired
consonants:
(е)
я е ё Ю 11
for example:
jasno ясно muz'eji музеи objezd объезд
jexat' ехать z11aju знаю podjom подъём
joi ёж brat'ja братья izja11 изъян
jug юг sud'je судье adjutant адъютант
stroja строя р'jи пью
moju мою cja чья
ТНЕ RUSSIAN SPELLING SYSTEM AND WORD-FORMATION 11
Remember that а hard sign and а nonfinal soft sign preceding а vowel symbol
always signal the presence of jot.
1-ютЕ: In а very few foreign wordsjo тау Ье spelled Ьу йо instead of Ьу ё;
e.g. N'ju-Jork Нью-Йорк 'New У ork'; jod йбд 'iodine.'
As one learns more about word-formation, the part played in it Ьу jot will
become clearer, but its role should not Ье obscured Ьу the spelling proЬ!ems
discussed above.
EXERCISE Identify jot and the role it plays in the following words:
Англия объяснить строй строёвой (они) едят
английский (он) бьёт стройный поездка повторяют
the division is стрбй-и-ть, rербй-а, etc. There is nothing whatever irregular about
jot or its use in grammar, as Iong as its spelling is understood. The necessity of
understanding the spelling of jot will Ье particularly evident when we consider
its role in vowel-zero alternations (pages 71-72).
The basic sounds of Russian and their spellings are summarized directly
below:
d t z s ь р V f
д т 3 с б п в ф
d' t' z' s' Ь' р' v' f'
l r т п g k х
л р м н r к х
SOFТ: с Ч sc щ
BASIC VOWELS
а э о у ы After hard paired consonants
а е о и i
я е ё-е ю и After soft paired consonants and j
А note оп ъ апdь
А ь after а final hushing of а noun does, however, mark the noun as а third de-
clension feminine (а noun ending in а hushing without а ь is а first declension
masculine ). Final -ь also acts as а grammatical marker in verbs in:
second singular present -s -шь знаешь
infinitive -с -чь помочь
imperative in hushing -i -жь режь (< резать)
Noninflected derivatives
Prefixes, suffixes, and roots are involved in certain noninflected categories,
but most noninflected words of derivational interest are derived from inflected
categories; for example, adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions which have be-
come fossilized from various inflected words or groups containing inflected
words:
ADVERBS
PREPOSIТIONS
CONJUNCTIONS
PARТICLES
From old tense form of а verb know ведь after all, why,
in root ВЕД you know
Noninflected Russian words which аге not derived from inflected categories are
scattered, and their derivation is of historical interest only.
For practical purposes, therefore, word-formation is concerned only with
the inflected categories: verbs, nouns, and adjectives. After our general state-
ment, we shall consider each of these in turn, in Sections 11, 111, and IV.
Any inflected Russian word consist~ of at least а root and an inflectional
ending. The ending may Ье zero. Words consisting of only root plus ending we
call nonderived (or primary) words. /па nonderived word the root is equal to the
stem; the stem is all of а word except the ending.
Nonderived words:
ROOT plus ENDING
Words which, in addition to the root and ending, have one or more deriva-
tional elements (prefixes and/or suffixes), we call derived words. In derived words
the stem is alи·ays longer than the root. 1
1 In certain nonprefixed words built with а zero-suffix the stem appears to Ье по longer
tlian the root; however, zero-suffixes must Ье counted. They are discussed оп рр. 23-25.
ТНЕ STRUCTURE OF INFLECTED RUSSIAN WORDS 15
Derived н·ords:
PREFIX(ES) ROOT SUFFIX(ES) ENDING
1 Roots
А root is an uncompounded element, tl1e part of the word which carries the
basic unextended meaning and is common to all the words of а family or 11:ord
nest (а word nest is, then, а family of all the words in а language sharing а given
root). From the standpoint of their meaning (and also of the building elements
which are used with them) roots are nominal (РЫБ 'fish '), adjectival (СТАР
'old '), or verbal (НЁС- НОС 'сапу'); the few roots which would seem to Ье
associated with other parts of speech usually function like one of the main
types; for example, ПЕРЁД - ПРЕД 'front, fore-' like nominal roots, СВОЙ
'own' like adjectival roots. However, а root Ъу itselfis neither а word nor а part
of speech; thus we distinguish the word and adjective стар (root plus zero-end-
ing) from the root СТАР, which is simply а building element of а word.
Russian roots of Slavic origin and from older borrowings always end in
consonants: 1 ХОД, РЕК, ТОПОР. 2 The typical Russian root has the structure
CVC, where С is one or more consonants and V is one vowel: БЕЛ, ХОД,
СТАН, РЕК, ВЕТ/Р. Some roots are disyllaЬic: ДОРОГ, ГОВОР, but with
very few exceptions, only non-Russian roots have more than two syllaЫes:
ГЕНЕРАЛ. А few Russian roots have the format УС; that is, begin with а
vowel: ИСК, УК.
Most roots are syllablc (contain а vowel), but there are nonsyllaЬic roots as
well, and many ofthem are important: Ж/д 'wait,' М/Р 'die,' Д/Н 'day.' Non-
1 Including Й: e.g. СТРОЙ 'build,' ЗМЕЙ 'snake.'
2 Most recent borrowings ending in vo\vels are assimilated to the Russian pattem; see
рр. 27-28 for fuller discussion of foreign roots and analysis of foreign words.
16 SECTION 1: GENERAL
syllaЬic roots тау occur in syllaЬic variants, containing а moЬile vowel. This
question is discussed in detail in the subsection on vowel-zero alternations.
There is only one nonsyllaЬic adjectival root: 3/Л 'evil.'
Most final root paired consonants are best regarded as not intrinsically hard
or soft; hardпess or softness depends on the first sound of the immediately fol-
lowing ending or suffix. In all of Russian grammar, for instance, final paired
consonants occur only soft before е. The nature of the final root paired con-
sonant тау also Ье important; for example, velars (k, g, х) occur only soft
before i (as well as before е), and / occurs only soft before the adjectival suffix
-/и-, whereas other paired consonants are only hard. Final paired consonants of
verbal roots occur only soft before endings in о, i, and а. 1 Examples:
СИЛ: сила силу силе силовой сильный
РУК: рука руку руке
СЛАБ: слабый слабую слабее
НЁС: несу несут несёт неси неся
ated with other parts of speech in fact may Ье assimilated to one of the basic
types: for example, ПЕРЁД - ПРЕД 'front, fore,' though it seems associated
with the preposition перёд and the prefix пред-, behaves like а nominal root;
e.g. it builds an adjective with the purely denominative suffix -ов-: передовой.
СВОЙ 'one's own, -prop(e)r-,' though it seems associated with the pronoun
свой, тау clearly Ье classed as an adjectival root; e.g. it builds the factitive verbs
(factitive verbs are built from adjectival roots) усвоить and освоить.
А small number of roots have undergone а type of semantic split which
causes us to assign а new part of speech to the new variant; in most cases an
older nominal (N) or adjectival (л) root becomes verbal (v). The semantic con-
nection usually remains clear:
БЕД N bad conditions БЕД v defeat, -vince (-vict)
бед-а disaster по-бед-и-ть defeat
бед-/ н-ый poor по-бед-#-а 1 victory
у-бед-и-ть convince
КЛЮЧ N key, spring КЛЮЧ v close, -clude
ключ-# key в-ключ-и-ть (in)close
за-ключ-и-ть conclude
ис-ключ-и-ть exclude
КРУТ steep
А КРУТ v turn
крут-ой steep крут-и-ть tum, twist
крут-изн-а steepness крут-/к-а 1 winding (yam)
за-крут-и-ть tum, twist
за-крут-/к-а tuming, twisting
The Root List at the back of the book, which assigns а part of speech to
each root, lists such roots as both N and v, both А and v, and so on.
The knowledge of the meaning of а root is obviously а powerful instrument
in the hands of the Iearner, but caution is advised against expecting the root to
provide an unambiguous meaning in every context. lt is true that most roots have
fairly specific or specifiaЫe meanings and that, together with correctly inter-
preted information about the rest of а word, they often provide the key to the
meaning. However, the meanings of many common roots may Ье rather elusive
in certain contexts. In many cases, particularly with verbal roots, а great deal of
experience with many words containing а given root is necessary before one
begins to acquire what is really less а concrete meaning than an idea, а set of
possiЬilities for the root.
1 The verbalization of these roots is suggested both Ьу their meaning and Ьу their capabll-
ity of being comblned with the zero-suffix and -/к- to make deverbative nouns with abstract
meaning.
18 SECTION I: GENERAL
Let us give three roots, one nominal, one adjectival, and one verbal, and list
аfew words built with each root and possessing varying degrees of association
with the central idea in the root.
МУЖ male, man
муж-# husband муж-ик-# peasant (arch)
муж-ск-бй masculine, men's муж-а-ют reach manhood
муж-чин-а man муж-(е)ств-о courage
нов new
нбв-ый new нов-изн-а novelty, newness
нбвь-#-# 1 virgin soil об-нов-и-ть renovate
нов-ость-# (а piece of) news; нов-ич-/6/к-# novice
novelty
СТУП step
ступ-и-ть - ступ-а-ют step
Verbs in -ступ-it-ть - -ступ-а-ют. Most have nouns in -ступленне, and some
have other corresponding deverbative nouns:
вь1ступ-и-ть (с inst) соте out, соте forward, appear puЫicly, perform
(with) (шЕА 'step out'); вь1ступить с песней, с докла
дом sing а song, make а report
на-ступ-и-ть step on; на-ступ-а-ют (impf only) attack, advance
о-ступ-и-ть-ся stumЬ!e; lose one's way (IDEA 'misstep ')
от-ступ-и-ть step back, recede; deviate, digress; от-ступ-а-ют (impf
only) retreat
пере-ступ-и-ть step over (Cf. пре-ступ-и-ть 'transgress. ')
по-ступ-и-ть enter, enroll (in an institution) (IDEA 'step in'); act, behave
(IDEA 'take а step ')
Cf. поступление 'enrolling, entering'; поступ/о/к-#
'act'; пбступь-#-# 1 'step' (person's).
при-ступ-и-ть к (dat) begin, get at (IDEA 'step to')
у-ступ-и-ть make place for, step out of the way of; concede
Nouns:
ступ-ень-# step (of stairs) ступ-иц-а hub (of wheel)
In the examples with al\ three of these roots the meaning of the root is less
а sure guide to the meaning of а word than an orientation point around which
one may group members of а word nest as one learns them.
1 These words have а zero-suffix as wel\ as а zero-ending. See рр. 23-25 for а discussion of
zero-suffixes.
ТНЕ STRUCTURE OF INFLECTED RUSSIAN WORDS 19
EXERCISE Using а dictionary, find а number of words built with the nominal root
КРАС. How wou\d the meaning of the root Ье characterized?
Latin roots
Russian contains а fairly large number of loan translations, also called
calques: literal translations of foreign words, especially the direct rendition of the
separate elements of prefixed or compound words into Russian equivalents.
Most calques are ultimately from Latin, either directly, or through French, Ger-
man, or English; the intermediary does not matter. If several words containing
the same root are involved, it may Ье useful to abstract the Latin root when
translating the Russian equivalent. Many such roots are verbal. Some examples
are:
вин -cuse из-вин-и-ть excuse
об-вин-и:-ть accuse
ВЛЁК -tract из-влёк-ут extract
от-влёк-ут distract, abstract
ключ -clude в-ключ-и-ть inc/ude
ис-ключ-и-ть exclude
за-ключ-и-ть conclude
КОРЕН -radic- ис-корен-и-ть eradicate
РОД -gen- вод-о-род hydrogen
род-и-тель-н-ый genitive
ТРУД -labor- со-труд-нич-ай-ут co\laborate
EXERCISE The verbal root ПИС frequently corresponds to Latin -scribe. Но\\' many
compounds in -ш1сать сап you find ,vhich have an English \'erb in -saibe as
one of their translations?
20 SECTION 1: GENERAL
2 Prefixes
Prefixes play а subordinate role in Russian compared to the root and more-
over, unlike suffixes, do not make parts of speech. There are, fundamentally,
three types of prefixes: (r) prefixes based on prepositions used in prepositional
phrases; (2) simple nominal and adjectival prefixes added to independent words;
and (3) verbal prefixes (sometimes called preverbs).
r. Many prefixed nouns and adjectives are derived from or hardly separ-
aЬ!e from prepositional phrases. They are built Ьу various suffixes and are some-
times called prejixed-suffixal nouns and adjectives. They are treated in more
detail in Sections III and IV, respectively. Here are some examples:
NOUNS
ADJECТIVES
2. Certain nominal and adjectival prefixes are not correlated with preposi-
tions (though а few may formally coincide with them) but are simply added to
independent nouns and adjectives. Except for the negative не, which combines
quite freely with adjectives, they build quite small groups ofwords. Some foreign
prefixes are included; these also build primarily small groups. Some of these
prefixes coincide formally with prepositional or verbal prefixes below, but they
must Ье co11sidered distinct from them, even if the meanings are similar. For
example, the под in подгруппа 'subgroup' is а nominal prefix which is simply
added to the 11oun; it differs fundamentally from the под/ in подполье 'under-
ТНЕ STRUCTURE OF INFLECTED RUSSIAN WORDS 21
ground' and подпольный 'underground (adj),' which аге based оп the preposi-
tional phrase под полем 'under the ground'; it also differs from the под/ in
подходйть 'approach' and in подход 'approach' (the verbal noun). Examples:
NOUNS
ADJECТIVES
3. Verbal prefixes differ fundamentally from the preceding two types. Ex-
cept for вз/ - воз, вы, низ/, пере - пре, and раз/, they have corresponding prep-
ositions with which they share а common origin. Verbal prefixes have primary
meanings of а physical, directional, or spatial nature, which may Ье close to the
meanings of the corresponding preposition (e.g. о(б/) in об/о/йдут 'go around '),
but most of them have one or more abstract meanings whose connection with
the primary sense or any corresponding preposition may vary from fairly ob-
vious to remote or unestaЫishaЫe (e.g. обслужйть 'serve, wait оп (submit to
serving),' обмерить 'give false measure (cheat),' объяснйть 'explain' (factitive
meaning 'make clear'). Verbal prefixes are very important in Russian and will
Ье considered separately in Section 11.
3 Suffixes
In nonsuffixed words the type of root involved determines the part of
speech; nominal, adjectival, and verbal roots build nouns, adjectives, and verbs,
respectively:
Nominal root РЫБ plus ending -а > рь1ба 'fish'
Adjectival root СТАР plus ending -ый > старый 'old'
Verbal root НЁС plus ending -ут > нёсут 'they сапу'
Prefix под plus nominal root ГРУПП plus ending-a > по,1грj'·ппа 'subgroup'
Prefix по plus verbal root МОГ plus ending ,ут > помогут 'they \vill help'
22 SECTION 1: GENERAL
In suffixed words the suffix assumes the role of part-of-speech maker from
the root, and we call suffixes nominal, adjectival, or verbal according to whether
they build nouns, adjectives, or verbs. In words which contain more than one
suffix, it is the last suffix which makes the part of speech; for example, in уч-it
тель-ств-ова-ть 'Ье а teacher' (suffixes italic) the verbal suffix -ова- makes the
word а verb. Suffixes may Ье comЬined with more than one type of root or
stem; for example, the nominal suffix -ств- makes nouns from nominal, adjec-
tival, and verbal roots or stems:
брат brother братство brotherliness
великий great величество greatness
производить produce производство production
or may Ье restricted to one type of root or stem; for example, the nominal
suffix -ость- makes nouns only from adjectives:
храбрый brave храбрость bravery
цен/ный valuaЫe ценность value
Some suffixes (including most verbal suffixes) are, for practical purposes,
exclusively part-of-speech makers; for example, -11- added to ГОВОР, -е- added
to СМОТР, and -ова- added to ИНТЕРЕС make verbs (говорить, смотреть,
11нтересовать); or they may delineate categories и·ithin а part of speech; for
example, -ivaj- and -aj- added to the perfective verbal stems спрос11 and по
мог create imperfective stems from them (спрашивают, помогут).
Many other suffixes (particularly nominal and adjectival suffixes), in addi-
tion to making parts of speech, also carry а general lexical meaning or restric-
tion. For example, the suffixes -ств- and -ость- discussed above build nouns
which have an abstract meaning. The suffix -тель- designates personal nouns of
agent of male sex from verbs indicating the action performed; for example,
учить 'teach,' учитель 'teacher.' The adjectival suffix -/н- makes adjectives from
inanimate nouns only; for example, кнпга 'book,' книжный 'bookish'; but -cк
makes adjectives from nouns denoting persons, places, and institutions; for
example, Ленин 'Lenin,' ленинский 'Leninist (adj),' Англ11я 'England,' анг
лпйский 'English.' Still other suffixes convey а diminutive or augmentative
meaning, often with overtones of affection or depreciation; for example, -/к
builds diminutive nouns (река 'river,' реч/ка 'little river'); -ищ- builds aug-
mentative nouns (дом' house,' до:\111ще 'Ьig house '); -оват- attenuates the force
of adjectives (зелёный 'green,' зеленоватый 'greenish ').
А given suffix may play several roles in the language; for example, the nomi-
nal suffix -/к- makes nouns of action/result from verbs (вь1став11ть 'display,'
вь1став/ка 'display(ing), exhiЬit(ion) '); nouns denoting female persons (а:\1ер11-
ка11/ка 'American (f) '); and diminutive nouns (река 'river,' реч/ка 'little river ').
ТНЕ STRUCTURE OF INFLECTED RUSSIAN WORDS 23
Many verbal roots, it will Ье noted, build only suffixed verbs; for example,
ГОВОР 'talk, say,' СМОТР 'look at,' and ПИС 'write' require the suffixes
-11-, -е-, and -а-, respectively, to make them verbs: говорйть, смотреть, and 011-
сать. In addition, а number of adjectival roots require suffixes to make them ad-
jectives; for example, ВЫС 'high' выс-ок-11й, КРЕП 'strong' креп-/к-нй, РЕД
'rare' ред-/к-11й.
Nouns built directly from such roots, 1 notaЫy nouns which are clearly
associated with suffixed verbs but do not themselves contain the verb-making
suffix, comprise а somewhat special case, since one cannot cite formal derivation
from а word. Here we тау say that the first word is correlated with the second
(in the sense that both are directly derived from the same element) rather than
derived from it. However, it is easily seen that semantically the difference is not
significant; 2 that is, that the correlated words are as closely associated as words
which are formally derived one from the other:
In these examples there is clearly no difference in the meaning ofthe root between
derivatives for the root and those for the suffixed word.
Zero-suffixes
А number of Russian words appear to Ье unsuffixed and yet, from their
meaning and the fact that they are а different part of speech from their under-
lying roots, it is clear that they have been derived Ьу something. Since endi11gs
alone cannot derive words or change the part of speech, we presume the exist-
ence of а zero-suffix between the root and the ending. А zero-suffix, just like any
Including prefix plus root in the case of prefixed verbal derivatives.
t
Nor should it Ье, since the suffixes have no meaning other than to make the correspond-
2
ing-part of speech.
24 SECТION 1: GENERAL
other suffix, makes а part of speech and has а meaning. 1 We may distinguish
three zero-suffixes: ( r) а nominal suffix which builds deverbative and deadjec-
tival nouns with abstract meaning; (2) an adjectival suffix which builds com-
pound adjectives based on phrases consistiпg of an adjective or the preposition
без plus nouns designating а part of the body; (3) а nominal suffix which builds
masculine compound nouns of agent in comblnation with а verbal root, which
is normally the second element of the compound, the first usually being а
complement of the action expressed Ьу the verb. 2 Examples:
4 Productivity
When we speak of an element or а process as productii·e, we mean that it is
alive in the language, that it is actively used in the formation of new words. For
example, Russian is still building new words Ьу adding the verbal formant -ова
tо а root {арест-ова-ть 'arrest ') and making new adjectives Ьу adding the adjec-
tival formant -/и- to а root (атои-н-ый 'atom(ic) '); hence we call -ова- and -/н
productive formants. An unproductive type cannot give rise to new words;
examples are the formant -е- in смотр-е-ть 'look at' and the formant -/б- in
судь-/б-а 'fate,' which are both totally dead. Among living types there can Ье
degrees ofvitality, and а given suffix may Ье productive for one type ofstem, but
not for another; e.g. -/ц- is productive for noun stems but not for adjective
stems (in ленин-/е/ц, but not in глуп-fе/ц).
А large percentage of common Russian words are built with formants
which are either completely dead or have lost some or most of their productivity.
For example, the verbal formants -а- and -е- are quite dead but, between them,
build more than а hundred verbs, many of them quite common (e.g. шrс-а-ть,
смотр-е-ть). Thus, while productivity suggests the lines along which new \\'ords
will Ье formed, it is obvious that we will not Ье аЫе to ignore the many dead
formants which are importantly represented in the Russian Iexicon.
The concept of productivity. is most important for formants but may Ье
applied to roots and prefixes as ,vell. Productivity of roots usually varies with the
usefulness, relevance, or generalizaЬility of the meaning; for example, ПИС is
obviously rich and generalizaЫe (though most of the words have рrоЬаЫу
already been built). РАКЕТ will рrоЬаЫу build new ,vords, ,vhile СОХ' ,vooden
plo,v' clearly has little future. Most of the important Russian prefixes are still
productive, though some have unproductive variants; for example, воз and пре,
of вз/ and пере respectively.
26 SECTION 1: GENERAL
D ANALYSIS OF WORDS
1 Principles of division
Basically, the structure of а Russian word is а rnatter of its derivational
history: of how it was built, of the elernents it was rnade frorn, and of any
changes which rnay have resulted frorn the cornbination of its elernents. Each
new unit is added to а ready whole; if the whole consists of rnore than one part,
the parts are taken together. Let us analyze three rather typical derived Russian
words:
резкость 'sharpness'
Root РЕЗ 'cut' + adjectival suffix -/к- > резк-ий 'sharp'
Adjectival stem резк- + (abstract) nominal suffix -ость- > резкость
'sharpness'
подписывают 'sign (imperfective meaning)'
Root ПИС 'write' + verbal suffix -а- > писа-ть 'write'
Verbal stem писа- + prefix под/ (meaning 'under, sub') > подписа-ть
'sign (perf)'
Perfective verbal stem подписа- + imperfectivizing suffix -ывай- > подпи
сывай-ут 'sign (impf)'
The above exarnples suffice to show that analyzing words is rnore than а
matter of sirnply breaking them down into their parts. One must know what the
parts are and rnean, as well as the implications of their comblnation (cf. sub-
section Е, pages 35-36). In the cases ofthe above three words (and, fortunately,
in thousands of other Russian words) the breakdown is straightforward. The
words are what they seem and, after having learned the basic patterns here,
one becomes аЫе to handle such analyses easily.
Many other words, however, are not quite or not at all what they seem at
first glance. Semantic shift without accompanying formal changes, popular ana-
logy, and various other factors тау have eroded or changed the correspondence
between the external makeup of а word and its present meaning or among words
within а nest. For example, the word муж 'husband' originally meant 'man'
ANAL YSIS OF WORDS 27
as well as 'husband.' The derived adjective муж-ск-бй 'male, men's' rests оп the
older meaning and does not mean 'husband's.' The connection between БЕД in
бед-/н-ый 'poor' and БЕД in по-бед-и-ть 'conquer' has become somewhat re-
mote, 1 while between буд-ут 'Ье' and за-буд-ут 'forget' there seems to Ье попе
at all. The verb создать - создавать 'create' has been assimilated Ьу analogy to
the -дать - давать type, whereas in origin it had nothing to do with 'give' but
belongs to the nonsyllaЬic type З/ Д 'build' (which makes the derivation seman-
tically more reasonaЬ\e); that is, со-зд-а-ть rather than соз-да-ть.
Or а word like стран-иц-а 'page' looks as if it should Ье derived from
стран-а 'country,' until one learns about Church Slavonicisms; specifically, that
СТРАН here is not 'country' but the Church Slavonic alternate СТРАН for
Russian СТОРОН 'side.'
There are а number of Russian words whose analysis requires special ety-
mological study. For example, ок/н-б 'window' is unanalyzaЬ\e in terms of the
modern \anguage. There is no suffix which may Ье separated out; -/н- builds
adjectives but not nouns. Yet ОК/Н seems an unlikely Russian root; most syl-
lablc roots are like ГОВОР, СИЛ, ВОД, etc.; they ordinarily do not end in un-
pronounceaЬ\e c\usters. Etymological studies reveal that the word was originally
а derivative ок-н; it is associated with ок-о, the old Russian word (still used
poetically and in other Slavic \anguages) for "еуе" (cf. а similar connection
between "еуе" and "window" in the English word "window,'' Old Norse
vindauga, i.e. "wind еуе "). 2
Certain special phonetic developments in peculiar contexts, popular ety-
mology, and certain other factors have also contributed to making а number of
Russian words unanalyzaЫe without special etymological help. For example:
This verb, which looks as if it lacks а root (prefix вы, suffix -ну-) replaced an
earlier (and etymologically correct) *вь1-н-я-ть (cf. the imperfective).
eign stems are not broken up into parts, even if they seem analyzaЫe, though
endings and Russian formants are separated; for example, през11дент, пропа
га11д-а, фра1щуз-с1~-иii (not 11ре-з11д-ент, про-паг-анд-а, франц-уз-ск-11ii). How-
ever, certain foreign suffixes have become Russianized to the point that it is use-
ful to separate them; for example, -11ст-, -11З:\1-. Such suffixes will Ье treated in
Sections III and IV.
Other words of foreign origin may Ье less or not at а\\ obviously foreign, so
that it may at first Ье difficult to tel1 that they are unanalyzaЫe. After one has had
enough practice working with roots and suffixes, relatively few foreign words
should Ье confusing. One develops а good sense for what Russian roots are like
and, having encountered most of the Russian suffixes, рrоЬаЫу does not try to
analyze older roots from non-Slavic languages like КАРАНДАШ 'pencil,'
ТОПОР' ахе,' ХУДОЖ• art.' Most older foreign roots, t\10ugh not themselves
analyzaЫe, may themselves build words:
1 Ап example of а foreign word ending in а vowel other than -а being assimilated, for
derivational purposes, to а Russian root type is the masculine кбфе ( < Dutch koffie) which
builds the adjective i,;oфeii11ыii.
2 lndcclinaЫe neuters like к~11ю may Ье used in compound words, where the о is assimi-
ln discussing fusion we are much more concerned with the many other
roots whose breakdown is to some degree meaningful; that is, where there is
some semantic connection, which may Ье quite remote or quite obvious, with
another (nonderived) root. Let us take some examples:
БОГАТ 'rich'
богат-ый • rich,' богат-ств-о • riches,' о-богат-и-ть •enrich.'
бог-ат related to БОГ 'god, divinity,' as in бог 'god,' на-бож-/н-ый 'de-
vout,' о-бож-а-ют 'adore.' But cf. у-бог-нй 'poor.'
ДОБР • good, nice'
добр-ый •good, nice,' добр-як •good fellow,' о-добр-и-ть •approve.'
ДОБ-Р related to ДОБ 'suitaЬility' as in у-доб-/н-ый 'convenient,' на
доб-/н-ый • necessary .'
КОН/Ц 'end'
кон/е/ц•end,' конеч-н-ый •final,' конч-и-ть •finish.'
КОН-Ц related to КОН, as in за-кон 'law,' нс-по-кон in испокон веков
'from time immemorial' (associated with 'beginning'; cf. Ч/Н in на
чн-ут • begin ').
ЛЁГ /К •easy'
лёг/к-ий 'easy,' лёгк-ость 'easiness,' об-лёгч-и-ть 'make easy, facilitate.'
ЛЁГ/К related to ЛЬЗ 1 in ПОЛЬ/3 'use,' as in польз-а 'use,' полез-/н-ый
•useful,' нельзя · it is impossiЫe.'
РАБОТ 'work'
работ-а •work,' работ-ник • worker ,' работ-а-ют •work.'
РАБ-ОТ related to РАБ 'slavery,' as in раб 'slave,' раб-ств-о 'slave.' Cf.
по-работ-и-ть 'enslave,' where the senses are very close.
cf. моч-11-ть '\\'et (tran),' про-:\lбк-ну-ть 'get \\'et,' :\Юч-а 'urine.' ЗЕ:\1 and
ЗЕМ/Л have the identical meaning 'earth': зе:\1:1-я 'earth'; compare зе:\1-н-бй
'earthly (referring to the Earth, the \,·orld)' \vith зе:\1.1-ян-бй 'earthen (made of
or connected \Vith earth, dirt, etc.)'; при-зе:\1.1-11-ть-ся 'Iand (in plane, etc.),'
зем.1-ян/к-а 'dugout,' назе:\1ь 'to the ground,' etc. No fusion has occurred here;
\\'е are dealing simply \\'ith а root \'ariant resulting from mutation. 1
The roots ДЕД (ДЁЖ-ДЕЖд) 'put, !ау,' ДЕН 'put, !ау,' ДЕЙ 'put,
!ау; do, act, operate,' and ДЕЛ 'do, make' are all related etymologically and
sho\\' semantic connection. The root 'give' has the variants: ДАД, ДАР, ДАЙ,
ДАН, ДАТ. Still other examples \Vith close or identical semantic association are:
Examples of the "later" type of fusion are comparatively fe\v. The adjec-
tival suffix -/н-, for example, retains its functional role in the so-called "relation-
al" adjectives, where it obviously derives а specific noun; for example, реч-н-бй -
река' river,' атом-н-ый - аТО:\1 'atom,' бр1аж-н-ый - бр1аr-а 'paper.' In а fe\\'
older adjectives in -/н-, ho\vever, the meaning has changed to the point \Vhere its
relation to the original is obscured or irrelevant; а breakdown is no Ionger
meaningful, and the -/н- has shifted to the root. For example:
крj'·п-/н-ый'large, major; coarse (as opposed to "fine"),' originally deri\'ed
from кр)-п-а•groats • (а type of coarse cracked ,,·heat); пе,,· deriYati\'e in
КРУП/Н: кр}-пнеют •become larger' (colloq)
бед-/н-ый 'poor,' originally БЕд-.'Н (cf. бе.1-а 'catastrophe'); ne,,, deriYatives
in БЕД/Н-: бе,1н-ость 'po,·erty,' бе.1н-е-ют 'become poor,' and others
The nominal diminutizing suffix -,'к- may fuse \\'ith а root if the root is no
Ionger used independently of it. For example, .16,1 к-а · boat · is originally а
diminutive of Old Russian *.10,1ь-/я, no\\' no Ionger used. Here the deri,·ative
simply replaces an older form, \vith по change in meaning. DerivatiYe \,·ords are
all built оп ЛОД/К; for example, .1б,1оч-,'н-ый 'boat (adj). • Fusion could also Ье
said to occur if the connection bet\\'een а noun and its diminuti\'e becomes alto-
gether remote. Ho\\·e,·er, though many former diminuti,·es in - к- (and other
suffixes as ,vell) have clearly lost their diminuti\'e status (i.e. do not mean "small
Х" but "regular-sized У"), the semantic connection remains close enough so
'go mad' (become with- verb prefix 'without mind' verb suffix
out mind) ('become')
-,'1.- and -/н-: The large number of adjectives in -/н- built on derivatives ш
-/1.- causes the frequent occurrence of -очи-:
в6д-/к-а в6д-оч-н-ый vodka (adj)
л6д-/к-а л6д-оч-н-ый boat (adj)
при-став-/к-а при-став-оч-н-ый prefixal
The оч/н type is emancipated from its dependence on the -/1.- suffix and is used
autonomously to build words lacking this suffix:
лент-а лент-очн-ый tape (adj)
карт-а карт-очн-ый card (adj)
-те.1ь- and -ств-: The frequent occurrence of -тельств- in words like
учитель-ств-о teaching profession (people or activity)
представитель-ств-о representation, representatives
where no *в:\lешате.ТJЬ or *доказате.1ь exists (in other words, the nouns are
built directly from the verbs в,1ешаются 'interfere' and доказать 'prove '). 1
EXERCISE Using the Root List and the dictionary, discuss the following words
and word groups in the light of the concepts of fusion treated above:
счастливый культурность - готовность
МЯГКИЙ ленивый - леность
грусть издательство - обязательство
важный принять-приятель
Our discussion ofthe emergence offused roots (bases) and enlarged suffixes
should have demonstrated the importance of semantic changes for the genera-
1 The emergence of -те.1ьств- was precipitated Ьу the following semantic change.
Words in -те.1ь-ств- originally designated only а group or body of agents; e.g. as above: уч11те
.1ьство 'teaching body,' представите.1ьство '(group/body of) representatives.' But v.·e note
that these words have acquired, in addition, abstract meanings ('teaching profession/activity,'
'representation ') which dissociate them from the agent suffix -те.1ь-. At this point we have а
new fused suffix -те.1ьств- with abstract meaning, which may build directly from verbs, whether
or not agent nouns in -те.1ь- coexist. E.g. стршiте.1ьство 'construction' is built directly on
строить • build' and not on стро1iте.1ь 'builder ,' though the latter exists.
COMBINING BUILDING ELEMENTS INTO А WORD 35
tion of new building elements and of semantic analysis for word study in general.
Though а strictly formal approach to morphology is certainly possiЫe, we be-
lieve that the application of semantic as well as formal criteria to word analysis
enaЫes us to acquire the truest and most useful insights into word structure.
feminine diminutive suffixes in #к (/-/ о/к and -/к-а). The consonant retains the
hardness or softness it has in the base noun:
вечер evening вечер /о/к- > вечер/6/к evening (dim)
вечер /к-а > вечер/ка
nузь1рь ЬuЬЫе пузырь /е/к > пузыр/ё/к ЬuЬЫе (dim)
пузырь /к-а > пузырь/ка
стена wall стен /к-а > стен/ка wall (dim)
няня nanny нянь /к-а > нянь/ка nanny (colloq) (dim form)
Preceding р, л, and н before nondiminutive suffixes in /к:
подарить give (gift) по-дар /о/к > подар/о/к present
переделают alter пере-дел /к-а > передел/ка alteration
звонить ring звон/о/к > звон/6/к bell, ring
The comЬination prefix-root is less complex than the other combinations.
Modifications and truncation do not occur when the prefix is nominal or adjec-
tival, and verbal prefixes offer only а few special proЫems, which will Ье treated
below.
Based оп the types of combination that occur and оп the types of processes
affecting the preceding vowels or consonants in the combinations, there is а
quite clear division in Russian inflection and word-formation: verbs (conjuga-
tion and verbal derivation, including imperfective derivation and conjugation-
ally derived verbal nouns in -ие) vs. nouns and adjectii·es (nominal and adjectival
declension and nominal and adjectival derivation). The basic differences may Ье
classified under four headings:
Types of comblnation (juxtaposition of sounds) involved:
Verb: AII types: CV, СС, УС, VV.
Noun/adjective: Only CV (declension and derivation) and СС (derivation).
Consonant mutation (see page 46 for tаЫе of consonant mutations):
Verb: AII mutations occur in both conjugation and verbal derivation.
Noun/adjective: Only velar mutations (plus ц > ч, к > ц) occur in nominal-
adjectival derivation. No mutation in declension.
Truncation:
Verb: Occurs, quite regularly in а number of positions.
Noun/adjective: Does not occur, except for very isolated instances.
Ot/1er modifications of preceding consonant:
Verb: Occur in specific positioпs.
Noun/adjective: Do not occur, except for very isolated instances.
COMBINING BUILDING ELEMENTS INTO А WORD 37
1 Verbal comblnation
Prefix plus root
At this boundary СС and VV, as well as VC and CV, generally result in
simple addition. There are certain proЬ!ems of spelling, however, and а few
special cases of truncation and modifications noted below:
VC: Simple addition as expected; e.g. пр11 ход > пр11хбд 'arrival,' по езд >
поезд 'train.' Note that пойду 'I will go,' зайду '1 will drop in,' etc. are regular
from по, за plus the root ЙД (ИД in initial position), but пр11дут 'they will
arrive' (пр11 йд ут; cf. пр11йтп) is irregular, as is пр11мут 'they will receive'
(from при й/м-ут).
CV: Simple addition as expected; e.g. 1в/ уч-11-ть > 11зучпть 'study.' In roots
beginning with i- (always spelled II in initial position) the variant after con-
sonantal prefixes is (ы), as we would expect after а hard consonant:
об/ иск-а-ть > обыскать search
с/ игр-а ют > сыграют play
пред ид-ущ-ий > предыдущий preceding
VV: Simple addition rather than truncation; for example:
на имен-ова-ть > наименовать name
при уч-и-ть > приучить train
СС: Simple addition rather than truncation; for example:
в/ ход > вход entrance
от/ дых > отдых rest
But note:
1. Prefixes ending in з are written with с before voiceless consonants; for
example:
вз/ ход-и-ть > всходить go up
из/ чез-ну ть > исчезнуть disappear
раз/ сказ > рассказ story
2. Prefixes ending in а consonant insert ъ before roots beginning v✓ith j; for
example:
в/ езд > въезд entrance
об/ ясн-и-ть > объяснить explain
3. Prefixes ending in а consonant insert о before almost all nonsyllabic
verbal roots and sometimes before initial clusters in syllabic verbal roots; for
eчmple:
38 SECTION I: GENERAL
But note обведут 'lead around,' обв11нить 'accuse,' and обвязать 'tie around'
(cf. обязать above).
The final root consonant if deleted is deleted in all forms of the verb, whether in
-ну- or in truncated -н-, but it appears in related verbs or other words in which
the suffix -ну- is not present:
-ну-: вз-гляjt ну-ть > взглянуть Cf. вз-rляд-ывай-ут > взгля- glance
дывают
And note the abstract nouns взгляд 'glance' and протяжение 'extent.'
Note that the final consonant is retained before -ну- in numerous other
verbs; for example:
от-прыг ну-ть > отпрь1гнуть jump back
риск ну-ть > рискнуть risk
NОТЕ: We will henceforth list verbs like взг.1януть and протянуть with а
slash through the trunca ted consonan t: взглярнуть, протяf нуть.
EXERCISES Combine the following e\ements into words, carrying out any changes
which seem indicated:
став и-ть брос ай-ут плак а-ть о стан вай-ут-ся
CV: Simple addition, except that а final root ve/ar mutates before any ending
beginning with о. 1 Examples:
нёс ёте > несёте you сапу стан ет > станет he will become
нёс и> нёси сапу! берег и > берёги guard!
нёс я> нёся carrying (pres
ger)
тек ут > тёкут they flow тек ёт > тёчёт it flows
могём > м6жём we сап с берёг ён > has been saved
сберёжён
у сек ён > усёчён has been нёс у> несу I carry
chopped off
СС: This comЬination produces а high percentage of the irregularities which
cause trouЫe in conjugation. Simple addition is rather rare:
мог ла > могла she could нёс ти > нёсти to сапу
adding а suffix -ть to а root in д - т: влад-ть > власть 'power,' страд-ть > страсть 'pas-
sion.' Cf. влад-е-ют 'own, possess' and страд-а-ют 'suffer' (Christ's passion). Note also из
вестия 'news' from вед-т; ест 'he eats' from ед-т; among others.
COMBINING BUILDING ELEMENTS INTO А WORD 41
EXE]JCISES ComЬine the following elements into words, carrying out any changes
which seem indicated:
берёг у вёз-ут
берёг ёт вёз ём
берег и по вёз ён
с берег ён
ComЬine the following elements into words, performing the necessary trunca-
tion and carrying out other changes that seem indicated:
плыв ть за-крой в
дуйл вы-пий т
вёз ла
ComЬine the following elements into words, carrying out any changes which
seem indicated:
плёт ти стриг ть на-чн ть блюд ти
1 The imperative ending is -и, replaced Ьу а zero (#) under certain stress conditions, but
always acting like the vowel ending -и; i.e. truncation and other modifications occur before it,
an,!1 final root paired consonants soften before it. Cf. Section 11, р. 96.
42 SECTION 1: GENERAL
2 Nominal-adjectival comblnation
Nomiпal-adjectival comЬinatioп, restricted as it is to CV, СС (except at the
uпproЫematical prefix-root bouпdary), lacking truпcatioп, апd limited essen-
tially to velar mutations, is far simpler thaп verbal comЬiпatioп.
old oldish
стар ый > старый nom sg стар-оват ый > староватый nom sg
стар oro > староrо gen sg стар-оват oro > староватого gen sg
стар ым > старым dat pl стар-оват ым > староватым dat pl
horse summer (adj)
конь-# > конь nom sg лет-и ий > летний nom sg
кон я > коня gen sg лет-и ёrо > летнёrо gen sg
кон ям > коням dat pl лет-и им > летним dat pl
CV: Simple addition. А final root velar, ц or ск, however, normally mutates
before an initial II of а suffix (cf. page 38):
рыб ак-# > рыбак fisherman
стар ость-# > старость old age
бел изн-а > белизна whiteness
бой ёв-ой > боёвбй warlike
блох ин-ый > блошиный flea (adj) (блоха flea)
1 The only exceptions аге the third declension instruшental singular ending -/ju (-ью), the
only consonantal ending in declension, and the zero-ending. The significance of these endings
fог con1Ьination, howcvcr, is li111ited to the role they play in vowel-zero alternations, to Ье dis-
cussed in subsection J below.
COMBINING BUILDING ELEMENTS INTO А WORD 45
волк иц-а > волчиц-а wolf (f) (волк wolf)
от/ц изн-а > отчизна fatherland (от/е/ц father)
СС: Most often simple addition. But final root velars and ц mutate, and the
hard-soft opposition in final root paired consonants is neutralized bet·ore most
suffixes in favor of the hard. А notaЬ\e exception is final root л, which occurs
only soft before consonants other than к, before which it occurs only hard.
This comЬination figures importantly in vowel-zero alternation at the inflectional
\evel (see pages 65-66):
гор /к-а > гор/ка little moun- месяц /н-ый > месяч- monthly
tain НЫЙ
рыб /н-ый > рь1бный fish (adj) мыл /к-ий > мь~лкий sudsy
рек /к-а > реч/ка little river суд /б-а > судь/ба fate
рек /н-ой > речной river (adj) дет ск-ий > детский children
город /к-# > горо little city дет ств-о > детство childhood
до/к коз /й-# > коз/и/й goat's
друг /к-# > друж/о/к friend (affec) собак /й-# > соба- dog's
ч/и/й
1 ТаЫе of mutations
CONJUGATION AND VERBAL DERIVATION NOMINAL AND ADJECТIV AL
AND COMPARISON OF ADJECТIVES DERIVATION
ц > ч т > щ
1 These are the so-called velar mutations, which are the most widespread in the lan-
guage.
2 When these consonants occur in their soft variants in the first singular present, past
passive participles in -ён, and imperfective derivation, they are historically mutations, and it is
useful to consider them as such. E.g. говорю, приговорён, and приговаривают show mutation
just as спрошу, спрошен, and спрашивают do, but the soft р in говор,iт is not а mutation (cf.
спросит). It is soft Ьecause all paired consonants occur only soft before verbal endings in i (cf.
р. 39).
3 The two Church Slavonic mutations are discussed on р. 58-59.
CONSONANT MUTATION AND ALTERNATION 47
2 Occurrence of mutations
Consonant mutation, as we have mentioned, does not occur in declension.
The positions in which it occurs in conjugation are well known and predictaЬ!e
to anyone who has learned to conjugate; they are given in the Verb ТаЫеs,
pages 86-87. Mutations in imperfective derivation are described in Section 11,
and those in verbal nouns in -11ё are inferaЫe from the conjugational pattern
(real or hypothetical past passive participle). Consonant mutations in nominal
and adjectival derivation (which is to say, for practical purposes, the velar mu-
tations, ц > ч, and ск > щ) are less obvious to anyone who has not studied this
derivation systematically and seem more or less scattered throughout the sys-
tem. In fact mutations in nominal and adjectival derivation may, for general
purposes, Ье said to occur in two contexts: ( 1) root or suffixal velar or ц preced-
ing а suffix beginning in а consonant: 1
слуг /б-а > служба service
рек /к-а > речка river (dim)
собак /й-# > собач/и/й dog (adj)
от/ц ск-ий > отеческий fatherly, paternal
куn-/е/ц /ств-о > купечество merchantry
вод-/о/к > водочный vodka (adj)
and (2) а final root suffixal velar, ц, or ск preceding и 2 or е (е or ё). Cases of mu-
tation before II are much more numerous and important than those of mutation
before е.
1 In both nominal and adjectival derivation suffixes beginning in consonants are sub-
stantially fewer than suffixes beginning in а vowel. Mutation does not take place before а num-
ber of the consonantal suffixes, simply because velars, ц, and ск happen not to occur before
them. As а result the number of suffixes before which these mutations occur is limited.
Velars do not mutate before the adjectival suffix -л- and mutate inconsistently before the
adjectival suffix -лив-:
круг л-ый > круглый round
блёк л-ый > блёклый faded
пуг лив-ый > пугливый fearful
but
берег лив-ый > бережливый thrifty
2 When а final root or suffixal velar does appear before an initial orthographic и of а
suffix, the basic suffix is in fact in -ы-, before which velars do not mutate but may occur only
soft; hence the spellings кн, ги, хн instead of *кы, гы, хы. E.g.
раб ын-я рабь1ня slave (f)
but
_ бог ын-я богиня goddess
48 SECTION 1; GENERAL
Mutation of velars, ск, and ц before the verbal su.fjixes -11- and -e-
Final root velars, ск, and ц in all forms of verbs built with the verbal for-
mant и mutated, and there are no verbs in 11 preceded Ьу а velar; all the forms
of all such verbs are in the corresponding hushing. Hence there is no alternation
within the paradigm. The velar may coexist in other words, related in one way or
another to the verb in the hushing, or there тау Ье no such word. Some ex-
amples:
служ-и-ть serve уч-и-ть teach суш-и-ть dry (tran)
у-слуг-а service на-ук-а science сух-бй dry
лощ-й-ть polish кбнч-и-ть end (tran)
лбск luster кон/е/ц end
But note по-луч-11-ть and реш-11-ть, which have no related words in *ЛУК and
*РЕХ; here we would simply write the root with the hushing.
In addition, final root velars in all forms of verbs built with the formant е
mutated, and the vowel shifted to а; 2 these verbs belong to the ЖА (hushing or
1 Before the possessive adjectival suffix -1111 (as opposed to the relational possessive suffix
-u11-, before which velars do mutate: блох 11u-ый > блош,iuый) velars do not normally mutate:
бабуш/к-1111 > бабушюш 'grandnюther's.'
2 That is, historically, *дерг-е- > держ-а-, *кр11к-е- > кр11ч-а-, etc.
CONSONANT MUTATION AND ALTERNATION 49
й plus а) type (see the Verb ТаЫе, page 87). Historically these verbs are identi-
cal to the modern verbs ofthe Е type (see the Verb ТаЫе), which were those with
roots not ending in а velar; e.g. смотр-е-ть, юш-е-ть 1 (it is thus no accident that
both types take the same second conjugational endings and have mostly in-
transitive meaning). Like the hushing-11 verbs just discussed, the hushing-a verbs
also have hushings throughout the paradigm, but here also the velar frequently
appears in related words. Examples:
держ-а-ть hold крич-а-ть shout (impf)
дёрг-а-ют pull крик-ну-ть shout (perf)
сль1ш-а-ть hear пищ-а-ть squeak
слых-а-ть hear (colloq) писк реер
VERBS
} Cf. р. 219.
50 SECTION 1: GENERAL
or consonant groups which have mutated from final root consonants and alter-
nate with these consonants occurring i11 other words. Words are denominative
and deverbative; in the latter case we have а zero-suffix (page 164). Examples:
ЗЕМ N earth: земл-я earth Cf. зем-н-6й earthly
ЛОВ v catch: лбвл-#-я catching Cf. лов-и-ть catch
про-ДАД v sell: про-даж-#-а sale Cf. про-дад-ут they will sell
НОС v сапу: нбш-#-а burden Cf. нос-и-ть сапу
ВС(Т)РЕТ v meet: встреч-#-а meeting Cf. встрет-и-ть meet
ТЁСТ N in-law: тёщ-а mother-in- Cf. тесть-# father-in-law
law
(cf. pages 40-41) may Ье noted with the relevant verb types (see Verb ТаЫе,
page 86).
Verb roots ending in -Й may have а root variant in -В, which is usually used
to make nouns. This alternation is essentially limited to three verb types (Й,
ОЙ, and ИЙ; cf. Verb ТаЫе, page 86, and lnventory, page 98) but affects
many of the verbs within those types. Most of these types exhiЬit vowel alterna-
tions as well (cf. page 53) :
ДУЙ-ДУВ Ыоw КРЫЙ - КРОЙ - КРОВ cover
БИЙ - БЬЙ - БИВ beat ЛИЙ - ЛЬЙ - ЛИВ pour
вь,-дуй-ут - вь,-дув-/к-а по-крбй-ут - по-кров
Ыоw out Ыowing cover cover
МЫЙ - МОЙ - МЫВ - МОВ wash
ШИЙ- ШЬЙ - ШИВ sew
на-ший-т - на-шив-/к-а
sew оп stripe, tab
CONSONANT MUTATION AND ALTERNATION 51
Verbs in ова and their derivatives comprise а special group in which root
-0В before consonant alternates with -УЙ before vowel:
ков-а-тъ forge куи-ут they forge
плёв-а-ть spit плюй-ут they spit
EXERCISES Сопsопапt mutatioп occurs before the first siпgular ending of verbs in
-и-; before the adjectival suffix -/н- анd before the пominal suffix -/о/к-#, опlу
velars апd ц mutate. Build the followiпg words, makiпg mutatioпs where
appropriate:
rлади -и rраф и -и век /н-ый ваг /н-ый город /о/к-#
о-слаб и -и в-ступ и -и с-нос /н-ый ноч /н-ой грех /о/к-#
чист и -и вь1-раз И -и дух /н-ый роскош /н-ый знак /о/к-#
спори -и брос и -и чест /н-ый овощ /н-ой лес /о/к-#
из-ум и -и цени -и рук /н-ой ног /н-ой друг /о/к-#
трат и -и ЛОВ И -и месяц /н-ый пар /н-ый глаз /о/к-#
жали -и таски -11
скок и -и об-наг и-и
конечный
порча купля
52 SECTION I: GENERAL
We have already seen (in the case of по-луч-и-ть and реш-и-ть) that not all
final root hushings are correlated with nonvelars in other words in the language.
In addition, hushings in foreign roots obviously do not rest оп nonhus'1ings; e.g.
in карандаш-н-ый 'pencil (adj)' and двух-этаж-н-ый 'two-storied,' the ш and ж
rest оп the original hushings in карандаш 'pencil' and этаж 'floor.' Finally, of
course, we must consider the total derivation of а word in analyzing hushings (or
other products of mutation); i.e. we must bear in mind the principles discussed
in D, "Analysis of Words," above. For example, the ч in встреч-н-ый 'meeting
(adj)' and the ж in про-даж-н-ый 'sale (adj)' differ fundamentally from the same
hushings in ручной 'hand (adj)' and книжный 'book (adj), bookish.' In the lat-
ter two cases, the hushing results directly from mutation of а velar before the
-/н- suffix; in the former two the hushing is due not to the -/н- (т and д do not
mutate before -/н-) but to а somewhat unusua\ case of mutation of the final root
consonants Т and Д (cf. page 50). The resulting встреч-а 'meeting' and
про-даж-а 'sale' now build adjectives in -/н-. That is:
but
встреч-Н-ЫЙ < встреч /н ЫЙ
про-даж-н-ый < про-даж /н ый
н VOWEL ALTERNATIONS
Except for the change о > а before the imperfectivizing suffix ivaj there are
по regu!ar vowel alternations in Russian grammar and derivation. Various his-
torica\ developments have left а number of unsystematic vowel alternations in-
volving certain (often verba\) roots, which at first seem quite random and
isolated. After enough examples have been encountered, however, certain corres-
pondences within very small groups ofwords become clear. Many ofthe alterna-
tions involve "irregularities" which are learned in the conjugation of certain
verbs or verb types, but they may at the same time affect isolated words as well.
It is useful to Ье at least passively aware ofthese alternations, while realizing that
they are vestiges of very old alternations which are по longer active in the
language.
The most important alternation is е (ё) - о. If the root consonant following
the vowel is а resonant, а nonsyllaЬic root variant may exist (i.e. zero a\ternates
wit\1 е and о, or eit\1er ofthe two). А final rootjot after one ofthe vowel variants
тау Ье truncated. Examples:
VOWEL ALTERNATIONS 53
е (ё) о #
нёсут they сапу носить сапу (nondet)
(det)
вёдут they lead водить lead (nondet)
(det)
вёзут they convey возить convey (nondet)
(det)
тёкут they flow тбк current
разберут they will analyze разббр analysis разобрать analyze
стерёгут they watch стброж watchman
стелют they spread стбл tаЫе стлать spread
пефть sing пой-ут they sing
рей-а-ть hover рбй swarm (as of bees)
Otheг alternations аге less important numerically. Some тау alternate with
а root variant in zero as above, and а final root jot тау Ье truncated. А few are:
о-ы-#: збв call бтзыв opinion звать call
у-ы-о: дух breath бтдых rest вздбх sigh
ой-ый: мбй-ут they wash МЬIТЬ wash
ой-ий-#й: ббй fight бить beat бьй-ут beat
ей-ий: брей-ут they shave брить shave
о-е(ё)-я: ложиться lie down лечь lie down лёг he lay down
лягут they will lie
down
а-е-я: садиться sit down сесть sit down сел he sat down
We have already mentioned (see page 50 above) certain cases in which
final root consonants as well as root vowels alternate (МОЙ - МЫЙ - МЫВ -
МОВ, КОВ - КУЙ). In а few cases involving nonsyllabic roots ending in -М or
-Н, the vowel я (а) before а consonant alternates with zero М or zero Н before
а vowel:
These cases will Ье noted again in the sections on verbal conjugation and
vowel-zero alternations.
In subsection В3 on page 9 we mentioned that stressed ё and е тау alter-
nate in the same root (жён-ы - жен-ск-11й), or even within the same paradigm
(вё-л - вед-ший). For historical reasons which are no longer always obvious in
modern Russian, stressed е came to Ье pronounced ё in certain positions, 1 while
it remained е in other positions. Some more examples:
1 Generally speaking, before hard paired consonants and i and i.
54 SECTION I: GENERAL
not "come from ") Old Church Slavonic; rather both languages derive from an earlier "Com-
mon Slavic."
CHURCH SLAVONICISMS 55
sophisticated stage of investigation the various different levels of vocabulary
which have been created Ьу the fusion of the Church Slavonic and Russian lexi-
cal stocks also deserve the attention of the student.
Let us now examine some of the most important alternations. It may Ье
noted that when Iexical items are involved, the Church Slavonic (ChS) variant
often has the more abstract or ethereal sense, the Russian (R) variant the more
specific or mundane meaning, alt/10ugh this is not alit·ays so.
(Below we shall let Р stand for both р and л; e.g. ТОРОТ means ТОРОТ or
ТОЛОТ, ТРЕТ means ТРЕТ or Т ЛЕТ, etc.)
Pleophonic alternations usually involve roots; i.e. ТОРОТ/ТРАТ, ТЕРЕТ/
ТРЕТ are variants of а root. Let us examine four cases covering all possibili-
ties:
СТОРОН/СТРАН side ГОЛОВ/ГЛАВ head
СЕР Ед/СРЕД middle МОЛОК/МЛЕК milk
RUSSIAN CHURCH SLA VONIC
сторон-а side стран-а country
серед-ин-а middle сред-а medium; Wednesday
голов-а head глав-а head (chief); chapter
молок-6 milk млек-о-пит-а-ющ-ее mammal (ПИТ 'feed ')
Both the Russian and Church Slavonic variants are used to build а variety
of derived and compound words. Once again, in cases where the R vs. ChS root
is the only or almost the only element distinguishing two words, the distinction
mentioned above frequently, but not always, applies. Some examples:
по-сторбн-н-ий outside, extraneous стран-/н-ый strange
сторон-и-ть-ся step aside, shun у-стран-и-ть remove, move
aside
EXERCISE Give the meaning ofthe following words (using dictionary, if necessary)
and discuss the relationships:
хорон-и-ть - хран-и-ть порох-прах
корот-к-ий - крат-к-ий город - Ленин-град
дорог-ой - драr-о-цен-н-ый береж-н-ый - не-бреж-н-ый
холод-н-ый - хлад-н-о-кров-н-ый голос - воз-глас
здоров-ый - здрав-ый
Russian РОТ-, 1 ЛОТ vs. Church Slavonic РАТ, ЛАТ in initial position
These alternations are not nearly so frequent as those involving pleophony
described above:
рбв/ный even рав/ный equal
рбб/кий timid раб slave
рбзниuа retail разница difference
In at least two cases Church Slavonic influence has caused orthographic
рот- > рат- outside of stress:
а. Prefix роз- (раз-):
And note:
нёс нёсший сапу вё;1 but велший lead
~,ё:1 :чётший S\\'eep uвё.'1 but uветший Ыооm
And compare:
совершённый (ррр) completed but совершен/ный (adj) perfect
The Church Slavonic mutations т > щ and ;i > ж;~ characterize а number
of verbs of Church Slavonic origin in -и- \\·ith а final root consonant in -т or -;i.
The first singular present, the past passive participle (and the verbal noun in -ие
if there is one), and the derived imperfecti,·e are affected.
In addition to these alternations, Church Slavonic stems may exhiЬit other
characteristics ,,,hich mark them as such. А root ,vill al,vays Ье in ра 1.'Ia · - ре .'Ie
rather than in оро-о.-10 - epe-e.'Ie. Church Slavonic prefixes пре-, воз-, and co-
will Ье used instead of Russian пере-, вз ·-, and с -. The imperfecti,·izing suffix for
ChS И ,·erbs is aj, never ii·aj (R verbs may ha,·e either). Any verb stem having
one of the features just mentioned ,,·ill
ha,·e them all if possiЫe. The follo,,·ing
sets of verbs illustrate and compare the alternations:
EXERCISE ldentify the following verbs not already so designated as R or ChS and
give the first singular present, past passive participle, and derived imperfective
(use ii-aj if the stem is R) of all verbs:
пре-врат-и-ть о-хлад-и-ть за-род-и-ть (ChS)
за-ворот-и-ть пред-о-хран-и-ть у-трат-и-ть (R)
воз-мут-и-ть у-сад-и-ть (R) посет-и-ть (ChS)
There are а few iso\ated cases of ч vs. щ alternating with an original root
final г or к plus ть:
the prefixes пред- and чрез- (cf. the Russian prepositions перед and через), the
rare низ/-, and ю/-, which corresponds to the Russian prefix вы- (the two have
basically the same meaning, but have developed their own distinct spheres of
usage in the Ianguage, and из/- cannot Ье regarded as an exclusively Church
Slavonic prefix). 1 Verbs built with Church Slavonic prefixes often have mean-
ings which are abstract or bookish, particularly in comparison to а correspond-
ing Russian-prefixed verb. Examples (,л,·ith corresponding R types, if they exist):
See the Prefix ТаЫе, pages 124-126, for а more complete discussion of вы - and ю/-.
2 The complex question of the vowel-zero a\ternation in prepositions is omitted here
to other forms of the same word or other words of the family. Learning when to
expect or suspect the existence of these alternations helps one to associate such
visually dissimilar words as:
мбх moss with its genitive singular мха moss
вошь louse with the adjective ВШИВЫЙ lousy
семья family with the noun семейство family
сослать exile with its imperfective ссылают exile
However, the question of vowel-zero alternations in Russian is а very com-
plex one, and we will have to investigate it in some detail. Not the least of the
proЫems it poses is that of а proper and consistent notation-clear and un-
amЬiguous designation of zero and vowels in the various building elements in-
volved in the alternations, both in words and when the elements are listed
separately.
крас/н-ый крас/е/н-#
62 SECTION I: GENERAL
а number of factors: the nature of the preceding consonant; the nature of the following con-
sonant; the stress pattcrn of the word; whether the word is foreign or Russian; whether the
conditioning element is derivational or inflectional (see below). However, rather than attempt
to memorize а very complex set of rules and exceptions, in practice it is best simply to Ье on the
lookout for vowel-zero altemations when dealing with any given consonant group.
It may Ье noted, in addition, that а vowel-zero alternation may exist in an individual's
pronunciation, though it is not reflected in spelling; e.g. мь1сль, кругл may Ье pronounced
[mys'il'], [krug:il] rather than [mys'l'], [krugl].
VOWEL-ZERO ALTERNATIONS IN PREFIXES, ROOTS, AND SUFFIXES 63
3. Consonantal or zero-suffixes
The following nonsyllaЬic suffixes condition а preceding moЬile vowel and
themselves participate in vowel-zero alternations at both the inflectional and
derivational levels:
-/к- -/u- -/н- -/н'- -/й- -/6-
The following suffixes condition а preceding moЬile vowel but do not themselves
participate in vowel-zero alternations:
-ств- 1 -ск- 1 -#-
SyllaЬic consonantal suffixes may condition а preceding moЬile vowel; for
example:
-щик- -ник- -чив- -лив- -чат-
ZERO·ENDINGS
DECLENSION
Masculine pronouns:
в/е/сь-# - в/с-я ч/е/й-# - чь/-я од/и/н-# - од/н-а
The numeral 8:
в6с/е/~rь-# - вось/м-и
1 After а final root hushing these suffixes are normally preceded Ьу е, but this cannot Ье
regarded as а normal vowel-zero alternation, since the vowel is not conditioned Ьу а follow-
ing nonvocalic element. -еск- and -еств- are simply vocalic variants of -ск- and -ств- after а
hushing consonant. Examples are given оп р. 69; cf. also the suffixes -ств- and -ск- in Sections
III and IV (рр. 167 and 218), respectively. ·
2 Most of the examples below are given in pairs consisting of: а boldface form which has
а zero-ending or consonantal ending conditioning а preceding mobile vo\\·el and а form (not
boldface) which has а vocalic ending conditioning а preceding zero.
64 SECТION I: GENERAL
Neuter nouns:
ок/н-6 - ок/о/н-# жить/-ё - жнт/е/й-#
с/т-6 - с/6/т-#
CONJUGATION
CONSONANTAL ENDINGS
DECLENSION
Inst sg: Feminine nouns (third declension):
-ью (-jи)
(this is the only consonantal ending in declension):
л/6/жь-#- л/ж-и - л/6/жь-ю
церк/о/вь-# - церк/в-и - церк/о/вь-ю
CONJUGATION
Infinitive -ть: 2
2 In the case of these two verbs the masculine past tense ending (i.e. only the nonsyllaЬic
ending) conditions а preceding moЬile vowel.
66 SECTION 1: GENERAL
Prefix под/- + root variant Б/Р + suffix -а- + ending -ть > под/о/6/рать
'choose (inf)'
but Prefix под/- + root variant Б/Е/Р + ending -ут > под/6/е/рут 'choose (З pl)'
Prefix из/- + root БЬ/Й + ending -ут > из/о/бь/ют • beat up (з pl)'
but Prefix из/- + root variant Б/И/Й + ending -ть > из/6/и/ть 'beat up (inf)'
Prefix от/- + root 3/В + suffix -а- + ending -ть > от/о/з/вать 'call back (inf)'
but Prefix от/-+ root variant 3/0/В + ending -ут > от/з/о/вут 'call back (з pl)'
Prefix с/-+ root variant С/Л + suffix -а- + ending -ть > сослать 'exile (perf)'
but Prefix с/- + root variant С/Ы/Л + suffix -ай- + ending -ут > ссылают 'exile
(impf)'
Prefix из/-+ root variant БЬ/Й + ending -ут > из/о/бь/ют 'beat up (perf)'
but Prefix из/- + root variant Б/И/ В + suffix -вай- + ending -ут > избивают
'beat up (impf)'
Prefix под/- + root variant Б/ Р + suffix -а- + ending -ть > под/ о/б/рать
'choose (perf)'
but Prefix под/- + root variant Б/И/ Р + suffix -ай- + ending -ут > подбирают
'choose (impf)'
More attention is given these types in the discussion of verbs, pages 75-76.
Alternations in suffixes are also conditioned Ьу the presence or nonpresence
of а following consonantal (syllaЬic or nonsyllaЬic) suffix:
Root КУС + suffix -/к- + suffix -/к- + ending -# > кусоч/ё/к 'little piece'
Cf кусковой 'cut in pieces, slices'
Root СЛУГ + suffix -/6- + suffix -ник + ending -# > служебник 'church
book' (book for church service)
Cf службист-# 'zealous but unimaginative worker'
Root + suffix -/ц-
МОЛОД + suffix -ск- + ending -ий > молодецкий
(ц-ск
'valiant'
> цк)
Cf молодцёватый 'dashing'
Root КУП + suffix -/ц- + suffix -ств- + ending -о > купечество 'merchantry
Cf купч (< ц)йха 'merchant's wife'
Note that the suffixes -ств- and -ск-, though they condition preceding vowel-
zero alternations, are not themselves conditioned Ьу following alternations.
1 That is, there is по phonetic reason for the nюЬile vowel in -б11р- and -сь1.1-, since -aй
is а vocalic suffix.
VOWEL-ZERO ALTERNATIONS IN PREFIXES, ROOTS, AND SUFFIXES 69
but
VELAR PRECEDES MOBILE VOWEL VELAR FOLLOWS MOBILE VOWEL
Nouns
Noun forms in nonsyllaЬic stems like льдом, рву, вшах, ржи, ста require
the analyst to posit а moЬile vowel for forms of these words which occur in а
zero-ending. The vowel is a\ways spelled'either е or о, and when the zero-ending
form is the nominative singular (as is the case with most masculine and all
feminine "third declension nouns," the dictionary form containing the vowel can
Ье found with little effort: лёд, ров, вошь, рожь; the zero-ending (genitive
plural) form сот would not Ье in most dictionaries. Conversely, the analyst con-
fronted with forms like лёд, ров, вошь, рожь cannot tel1 whether the vowels are
moЬile, nor will the ordinary dictionary give him this information, unless it hap-
pens to include other forms under the entry.
Noun forms in syllaЬic stems involving а final consonant cluster which does
not clearly indicate а suffix containing zero are тоге proЫematica\, and for per-
sons not very well acquainted with the zero-containing suffixes, words in these
elements would also Ье trouЫesome. For example, Russian feminine nouns in
-ска normally contain а mobile о between the с and the к. Words in -/к- like
запuс/ка 'note,' колбас/ка 'sausage (dim),' and матрос/ка 'chi\d's sailor jacket'
clearly contain а zero. The analyst then needs to discover that most words in
which the к is not suffixal, including foreign borrowings in -ска, 1 have been as-
similated to the vowel-zero pattern:
дос/ка - дос/6/к board мае/к-а - мае/о/к mask
мис/ка - мис/о/к basin фрес/к-а - фрес/о/к fresco
1 Foreign words in [-sk] borrowed into Russian as masculines соте in as -ск, without а
vowe\-zero alternation: риск - риска •risk,' моллюск - молшоска •mollusk.'
VOWEL-ZERO ALTERNATIONS IN PREFIXES, ROOTS, AND SUFFIXES 71
However, at Ieast one word, даска - ласк 'caress' does not show the a\terna-
tions (but cf. лас/ка - .1ас/о,'к 'weasel,' which does).
Most proЬ\ematica\ are final stem c\usters whose second e\ement is а reso-
nant, and analysis of all the clusters involved is so complex that we cannot go
into it here. Diverse historical factors, both phonological and morphological,
and a\ternations in both phonological and morphological patterns as а result of
foreign borrowings, influences from various dialects and \evels of style and usage
have complicated the question enorrnously. Clusters involving а stem final р
present а particularly diversified picture; compare:
DO NOT CONTAIN ALTERNATION CONTAIN ALTERNATION
As сап Ье seen from the above examples, spelling of the basic moЬile о is com-
plicated Ьу the fact that paired consonants occur soft as well as hard before it
(spelling е (or stressed ё) as wel\ as о) and Ьу various other spelling ru\es; for
example, after hushings the spelling is е if unstressed and о if stressed.1 А num-
ber of rather cumbersome rules for the spelling variants о and е cou\d Ье given
in addition, but their specification Iies beyond our purposes and scope.
The moblle i-o11·e/ and jot. The facts concerning vowel-zero alternations are
basical\y no different when jot is involved in the consonant group, though the
facts of spelling discussed on pages 10-11 must Ье kept in mind. In certain cases,
- 1 E.g. че.1овеч,1 ё/к, but знач/б,'к; горбш/ё/к, but греш,'б/к.
72 SECTION 1: GENERAL
however, and regularly in the genitive plurals of nouns in -ья and -ьё, the moЬile
vowel precedingjot is spelled 11 if unstressed. Elsewhere, and always when it is
stressed, the moЬile vowel precedingjot is е. 1 In either case jot now appears as й
(since it follows а vowel), whereas it was represented orthographically Ъу ь plus
the "soft" vowel symbol in the form without the mobile vowel. Examples:
семь/я gen pl сем/е/й family
стать/я gen pl стат/е/й article
жить/ё gen pl жит/е/й life
мужь/я (nom pl) gen pl муж/е/й husband
but, with unstressed moЬile vowel:
гость/я gen pl гост/и/й guest (f)
воскресень/ё gen pl воскресен/и/й Sunday
копь/ё gen pl коп/11/й spear
NОТЕ: There is a\so а group ofmasculine nouns in consonant plusjot, whose mo-
Ъile vowel е, a\ways stressed, is in the dictionary form; e.g. руч/е/й, genitive
singular ручь/я 'brook'; вороб/е/й, genitive singular воробь/я 'sparrow.'
If the moЬile vowel Jollmvs rather than precedes jot, the spelling situation is
different; the jot is represented together ,vith the moЬile vowel Ъу а single letter
(е, ё, 11, я). We may note that ю is never involved in the vowel-zero alternation,
and и and я each only in one word: яй/цб, genitive plural я/ir/ц 'egg'; and
за/я/ц, genitive singular зай/ца 'hare.' In the forms without the moЬile vowel, й
precedes the consonant. This type of alternation is the rule when jot precedes
а suffix or а similar internal element containing а zero. Examples:
EXERCISE Find the dictionary form of the following genitive singular (masculine
or feminine third declension) and genitive plural feminine and neuter words:
льна пня дёгтя ржи австрийца стрелка
рта ремня вши угля пайка дельца
1 А single exception to this rule is the genitive plural of ружь/ё 'gun,' which is руж/е/й.
See р. 74 for discussion of the sаше phenoшenon with respect to certain adjectives and the
pronoun ч/e/ii.
VOWEL-ZERO ALTERNATIONS IN PREFIXES, ROOTS, AND SUFFIXES 73
Alternations in syllaЬic stems almost always involve the final stem consonants н
and, much less often, к (these elements are usually analyzaЫe as suffixes, but
where they have lost their suffixal status, as in блед/ный-whеrе БЛЕД/Н is а
new "fused" root rneaning 'pale '-this fact does not change their effect оп pre-
ceding vowel-zero alternations). Before -/н- the moЬile vowel is spelled е if un-
stressed; if stressed it is ё, except after а hushing, in which case it is о. Before
-/к- the vowel is usually о, unless it is preceded Ьу а soft paired consonant,
or jot; for example:
-/н -/к-
интерес/ный - интерес/ё/н креп/кий - креп/о/к
яс/ный- яс/ё/н г6рь/кий - r6р/ё/к
ум/ный - умён бой/кий - б6/ё/к
смеш/н6й - смеш/6/н
1 Ordinary short forms of long-form adjectives (крас/е/н - крас/ный), of course, are case-
less; restricted as they are to predicate usage, they distinguish only gender (in the singular) and
number. We include "nominative" in parentheses here to cover cases of mixed declension, in
which the short forms, which may Ье used attributively or predicatively, are case forms (со
бач/н!й nominative singular masculine vs. собачь/ю accusative singular feminine or собачь/ёго
geoitive singular masculine neuter, etc.
74 SECTION 1: GENERAL
Occasionally а douЫet exists; for example, бст/р-ый 'sharp': бстр and ост/ё/р.
There may Ье some lexical or stylistic differentiation; for example, остёр, but not
бстр, means 'sharp-witted, quick.'
The moЬile vowel orthographic и exists in one isolated case, достб/11/н from
достбii/ный 'worthy' (cf. спокб/ё/н from спокбй/ный 'calm ') and in relational-
possessive adjectives built with the suffix -/й-, which have а zero-ending in the
nominative accusative masculine singular. The ordinal numeral трет/11/й also
follows this pattern:
коз/и/й - козь/я козь/и козь/ёго козь/ёму goat's
рь16/и/й- рь1бь/я рь1бь/и рь1бь/ёго рь1бь/ёму fish's
трет/и/й - треть/я треть/и треть/ёrо треть/ёму third
Pronouns. The interrogative pronoun ч/е/й, чь/я, чь/ёгб, etc. has the same
declension as these adjectives, but the moЬile vowel, since it is stressed, is е
rather than и 1 (cf. the same е - и alternation with stress in genitive plurals of
nouns in -ья and -ьё, discussed above).
The pronoun в/е/сь - в/ся, в/сёгб exhiЬits а normal vowel-zero alternation
(moЬile vowel basic е before soft paired consonant). The pronoun од/п/н - од/на,
од/ногб, however, is unusual in having а moЬile basic (i.e. stressed) i alternating
with zero.
Build and decline а relational-possessive adjective in -/й- from the word баран
'ram.'
Verbal derivation
In verbal derivation there is one important vowel-zero alternation which in-
volves the aspectual opposition in а large number of nonsyllaЬic 1 verb stems of
prefixed perfective (zero alternant) vs. prefixed imperfective (vmt·el alternant) de-
1 Most nonsyllablc stems in -и- do not have any moblle vowel before the imperfectivizing
suffix -aj-: -льстить and -мстить; e.g. обольстить-обольщают 'seduce'; отомстить
отомщ:iют (imperfective is obsolete) 'revenge oneself.' But note the group -пб~ш,1ть - -по~111-
н1iют 'remember.'
76 SECTION 1: GENERAL
Such variation makes it difficult to give precise distributional rules for all pre-
fixes and all clusters.
The prefix с/- occurs in со- with particular frequency, notaЫy in the follow-
ing contexts.
The prefix с/- always occurs with о if the first consonant of an initial root
consonant is с or з, or before any initial root cluster щ:
состригут - состригают shear off
созреют - созревают ripen
сощипать - сощипывают pinch off
In а number of words of Church Slavonic origin со- occurs with roots
beginning with а single consonant:
сочинить - сочиняют compose сожалеют (impf only) regret
содержать (impf only) contain совершить - совершают finish
And со- is autonomous in а number of words in which it corresponds to
Western European со- (cf. page 132):
сосуществовать (impf only) coexist
сонаследовать (perf and impf) coinherit
The prefix в/- occurs in the variant во- when it precedes а root or base be-
ginning with а vowel:
вообразить - воображают imagine
воодушевить - воодушевляют inspire
Many nonsyllaЬic verbal roots build one or more abstract nouns of action/
result, usually with а zero-suffix or -/к- (cf. page 68 above) or other element
,..hich conditions а moЬile vowel in the root. The Yowel is usually basic о (spelled
78 SECTION 1: GENERAL
о or ё) or i (spelled II or ы). Here are some examples of such nouns together with
the verbs with which they are associated:
вь1бор choice вь1б/рать choose
разбор analysis раз/о/брать analyze
отрьш/о/к fragment оторвать tear off
зов call з/вать call
призь1в appeal приз/вать summon
поимка catching поймают catching
уборка harvest уб/рать harvest
счёт calculation с/о/ч/тут calculate
ПОДЖОГ arson под/о/ж/гут set fire to
нажим pressure наж/мут press
напор pressure нап/рут press
In а very few cases the vowel alternates with the zero at the inflectional Ievel
as well as at the derivational; for example:
Ш/д has the vocalic variants Ш/Ё/д and Ш/Е/д. Ш/Ё/д occurs before the non-
syllabic past tense ending -л before which д is truncated, 2 and ШЕД before all
endings beginning with -ш- (past gerunds and past active participles):
нашёл (*нашёрл) Cf. нашла (*нашрла)
нашедши, нашедший, etc.
Consonantal prefixes occur with moЬile vowel before both Ш/Ё/д and Ш/Е/д,
even though they are syllaЬic:
1 Root initial Й- becomes И- when it occurs in initial position: cf. ,щу '1 go,' пойду '1
will go'; имеют 'have,' займут 'occupy.'
2 Truncation of root final д before the past tense endings in -л- is general in Russian:
вёд-л > вёл, мi!т-ла > мела, etc.
VOWEL-ZERO AL TERNA TIONS IN PREFIXES, ROOTS, AND SUFFIXES 79
отошёл (as well as отошла)
отошедши, отошедший, etc.
The root ХОД, etymologically related to Ш/Е/д and Ш/д, serves to build
the nondetermined verb and imperfective compounds, and is the variant used in
most of the deverbative nouns and adjectives:
ходить go ХОД movement
находить find наход/ка find
отходить step away отход departure
ход/к-ий marketaЫe
The root variant ШЕСТ ( < Ш/Е/д - Т) comЬines with the suffix -вий- to
form а handful of nouns; e.g. шествие 'procession,' нашествие 'incursion.'
The nonsyllaЬic root Й/М has several syllabic root variants containing
various vowels: 1 ИМ, ЕМ, ЁМ, Я{Т), НЯ(Т), НИМ. Й/М, НИМ, and НЯ
alternate in an important family of prefixed verbs (the И/М - НИМ type in the
Verb ТаЫе, page 86). Before vocalic endings Й/М is used regularly before the
imperfectivizing suffix aj. Nouns associated with these verbs are built with
various of the root variants. Examples (with root variants boldface):
займут occupy, lend занятие occupation
занять за/ё/м loan
ЗаНаVIаЮТ заимствовать borrow
ПОДНИ:\-1ут raise поднятие raising
поднять подъём rise
поднимают
проймут penetrate пройма armhole (in а dress, etc.)
пронять
пронимают проём aperture; embrasure
снимут take off/down; снятие taking off, taking down
снять photograph спим/о/к photograph
снимают съём/ка survey; shootiпg (film)
съём output (as of steel)
and "replaced" the initial jot. ln the case of НЯ the root final М is truncated before the con-
sonantal endings; i.e. -н-ям-ть > -пять, etc. AII the vowels are properly regarded as mobile, but
for purposes of simpler notation we do not enclose them in slashes; i.e. НЯ, ЁМ, rather than
Н/Я/;/Ё/М (Й/O/М), etc.
80 SECTION 1: GENERAL
EXERCISE Discuss and account for the vowel-zero alternations in the following
groups of words:
житьё - житейский нашьют - нашивают - нашивка
служба, служб - служебный примут, принять - принимать - приём
Литва - литовский бьют, бить - бой
огонь, огня - оrонёк, огонька стлать, стелют - СТОЛ
разорвать- разрывают- разрь1в разомнут, размять - разминают
II
VERBS
а single or basic stem, which is equivalent to or includes the basic root of the
verb. This basic stem enaЫes us to predict the conjugational forms of а given
verb and also allows us to approach efficiently certain important proЫems of
word-formation.
The basic stem is easy to obtain. Practically speaking, it is simply whichever
ofthe two stems, the present or the infinitive, is the longer. 1 For example, ofthe
third plural present говор-ят and infinitive говори-ть, the latter stem is basic,
while of жив-ут and жи-ть the former is basic. 1f the two stems are of the same
length, the third plural present stem is basic: вед-ут not вес-ти. This will mean
in practice that consonanta/ 2 basic stems will always Ье derived from the third
plural and vocalic basic stems from the infinitive, simply Ьу subtracting either -ut
or -t' as appropriate. Henceforth, therefore, we shall give only the third plural
for consonant stems and the infinitive for vowel stems, and we shall call each the
basic form for its type of verb. The other forms are then obtained from the basic
form Ьу subtracting -ut or -t' to obtain the basic stem, апd theп adding the de-
sired ending and applying the rules of combination (Verb ТаЫе, pages 86-
87).
EXERCJSE Obtain the basic stem and mark it "С" if consonantal, "V" if vocalic.
деть-денут шагнуть - шагнут спрятать - спрячут
редеть - редеют читать - читают понять - поймут
звучать - звучат рвать-рвут пасти - пасут
стричь - стригут жать-жнут колоть - колют
спорить - спорят вьпь-воют тереть - трутЗ
кипеть - кипят ПЛЬIТЬ - плывут требовать - требуют
свергнуть - свергнут
few n/sA steшs which have а шоЬilе vowel in the present steш also violate the rule; e.g. б/ра-ть
бср-ут 'take.'
2 А "consonantal" basic steш ends in а consonant; а "voca\ic" steш ends in а vowel.
we give по-й/м-ут as the example for the type), but this fact in itself has по bear-
ing оп its classification or conjugation.
What is important i11 classification and conjugation is whether or not the
stem has а suffix, and we divide all basic stems into two types: nonsuffixed (with-
out а suffix) and suffixed. А nonsuffixed (nonprefixed) stem is equivalent to the
root and, since all Russian roots end in consonants, all nonsuffixed stems are
consonantal: нёс, жив, стан. Suffixed stems consist of а root plus а suffix:
люб-11, ш1с-а, интерес-она. AII ofthe suffixes (and hence the resulting stems) are
vocalic except two: АЙ (дел-ай) and ЕЙ (у~1-ей) are consonantal.
Nonsuffixed stems are further divided into resonant stems and obstruent
stems, according to their final consonant. Resonants differ phonetically from
obstruents (they are less consonantal), but it may Ье simpler merely to memo-
rize the groups; note that the six obstruents comprise three voiced-voiceless
pairs: Д- Т, З - С, Г - К. The resonants (Й, Р, М, Н, В) are поt paired as to
voici11g. (с, though it is paired with/ pho11etically, fu11ctions as а reso11ant i11
co11jugatio11.)
The great majority of 11011suffixed stems are syllabic: нёс, ж11в, стан. No11-
syllabic 11011suffixed stems comprise reso11a11ts i11 /Р, 1 /М - /Н, a11d Й/М - НИМ
(НИМ is а syllaЬic varia11t of Й/М) and 011\у two obstrue11ts: ж/г 'bur11,' ч/т
'regard.' There are а 11umber of suffixed stems in no11syllaЬic roots, about fiftee11
ofwhich are built with the suffix -а-, formi11g а type which we designate "n/sA":
ж/д-а-ть 'wait' (see Verb ТаЫе, page 87). There are а few others as well; e.g.
мст-11-ть 'reve11ge 011eself,' т/к-ну-ть 'jab.'
EXERCISE ldentify the stems from the exercise 011 page 82 as suffixed or no11suffixed.
Mark а11у 11011syllabic stem "11s."
2 Conjugation
The Verb ТаЫе 011 pages 86-87 lists all the stem types into which we
divide 11011suffixed and suffixed verbs. Nonsuffixed verb types are 11ormally
designated Ьу the last sound of the root, and suffixed verb types Ьу the suffix, in
uppercase Cyrillic letters. With each type we give an example, where possiЫe а
verb already familiar, which we call а "head verb.'' F or example, the head verb
for the А type is ш1с-а-ть: а11 А verb acts like ш1с-а-ть; i.e. conjugates the same
way and works the same way i11 derivatio11. Иск-а-ть 'seek' has mutation in the
prese11t te11se a11d imperative, builds imperfectives with ii·aj, and acts i11 other
ways like ш1с-а-ть; it is, therefore, an А or писать verb. ·
1А slash used with а stem type designator indicates the presence of zero in Yerbs of that
type;_ e.g. /Р (т/р 'rub'), n/sA (ж/д-а-ть '\vait').
84 SECTION 11: VERBS
А head verb shows all the major features common to its type but it cannot, of
course, portray variations и·ithin а type. For example, пис-а-ть, as the head verb
of а type comprehending more than one stress pattern, cannot serve as а stress
model for all А verbs; it has shifting stress (as does иск-а-ть), but the А verb
маз-а-ть 'smear' has stem stress; i.e.
ln the tаЫе the process of simple addition and the process of truncation of
а preceding alike are taken as normal, as is the automatic softening о/ апу paired
consonant before апу ending in о, i, or а (cf. Section 1, page 39), but all
other modifications within а stem are specified. The tаЫе also contains some
general statements about stress. The stress of Russian verbs is rather complex,
and а detailed description of it is given below in an excursus beginning оп page
90. The basic forms in the Verb Inventory (pages 98-100) are accented (or not
accented) according to the system described there. The head verbs, however,
bear no information as to stress (since тапу stem types have more than one
stress pattern among their verbs, and а single verb could exemplify only one
pattern); instead, if а stem type has а single stress pattern for all verbs, this in-
formation is given in the tаЫе.
VERBAL ENDINGS
CONSONANTAL: 1. Infinitive -t' (-t' i)
2.Past tense -/ -!а -!о -/'./
3. Past gerund -vf-vsoj/-si
4. Past active participle -vsoj/-soj
5. Past passive participle -t/-n
VOCALIC; 6. Present tense:
First singular -11
First conjugation -os -ot -от -ot'e -111
Second conjugation -is -it -im -it'e -at
7. Imperative -i(-#) (-t'e)
8. Present gerund -а
PAST PASSIVE
PARТICIPIALENDING:
-ён -н
1
1 1 1 1
Resonants Obstruents И АН others
PAST ACТIVE
PARТICIPIAL ENDING:
-ший -вший
1
1 1 1 1
Obstruents (НУ) Р All others
CONSONANT
MUTATION:
и Е
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
First Past Imperfecti ve First Past Imperfective
singular passive derivation singular passive derivation
present participle present participle (rarely)
(rarely)
жив-ут live в
ден-ут put Н Stem stress.
дуй-ут Ыоw й
мой-ут wash ОЙ о > ы before С. Stem stress.
пий-ут drink ИЙ 1 ий > ьй before V. 1
т/р-ут rub /Р2 /р > ере before -ть and ёр before other С.
Masc past -л drops.
ж/м-ут press /М-/Н /м - /н > я (а after hushings) before С.
по-й/м-ут understand Й/М (After У prefix) й/м > ня before С.
с-ним-ут take off НИМ 3 (After С prefix) им > я before С. Shifting
prefixal stress in past. Shifting stress in
pres (НИМ type only).
1 ий > ьй before а stressed vowel is а general rule in Russian; cf. verbal nouns in '11ё
alternating with -ь/ё (решеm1е vs. ж11тьё). In the Ий type all verbal endings are stressed;
hence basic form ш1й-ут gives third plural пыот (а nonsyllaЬic present stem).
2 For past gerund and past active participle add -ш11(й), not -вш11(й), to stem.
3 й/м is а nonsyllaЬic verbal root with the meaning 'take, have'; ним is а syllaЬic variant
of it.
4 Have end stress in the past and infi11itive in -ти except for а few stems in Д and З, which
CONSONANT STEMS
impf deriv.
ум-ей-ут know how ЕЙ
EXCEPTIONAL ТУРЕ
да-вай- give АВАЙ авай > ай in pres tense 011(1·, and pres
tense endings are stressed.·
Below we conjugate the twenty-five head verbs, giving as many ofthe above
forms as exist for each type. Note that the past active participle stands a\so for
the past gerund, if one exists, and that of the present tense only the first and
second singular and third plura\ are given:
NONSUFFIXED STEMS
в н й ОЙ
/ / / /
жить деть дуть мыть
/ / / /
жил дел дул мыл
ИЙ /Р /М-/Н Й/М
I ,,
пить тереть .жать понять
/ ,,
пил тёр жал пбнял
пила пили тёрла жала поняла пбняли
пивший тёрший жавший понявший
-пит -а -ы -тёрт -жат пбнят -а -ы
/ ,,
пью тру жму пойму
пьёшь трёшь жмёшь поймёшь
/ /
пьют трут жмут поймут
/ /
пей три жми пойми
ведомый 1 (везомый)
SUFFIXED STEMS
и Е ЖА А n/sA
,,
просить смотреть держать писать ждать
просимый
1 Present passive participles in -0~1ый from some obstruents are occa~ionally found but,
practically speaking, are rarely used.
2 Present gerunds are very rare for А verbs but do exist; e.g. п:1акать - п:1ача. Пиша was
used_ in earlier Russian, notaЫy Ьу Pushkin.
90 SECTION II: VERBS
ОБА о НУ (НУ)а
(НУ)Ь АЙ ЕЙ АВАЙ
as opposed to patterns with stress shifting from the ending (in the first singular)
to the last syllaЫe of the stem (in the other forms):
люблю любишь любят
CONJUGATION 91
as opposed to verbs with ending stress only in the feminine and stem stress in all
other forms:
жил жила жило жили
Some prefixed resonant stems and some irregular verbs (notaЫy быть and
дать) have shifting stress between the prejix of past tense and past passi1:e pш
ticiple nonfeminine forms and the ending of the corresponding feminine forms.
А few of the same types of stems when unprefixed may stress не with nonfemi-
nine past tense forms. We call this type of stress prefixal and designate it Ьу plac-
ing а "greater than" sign ( >) over the prefix vowel receiving the stress.
>
проживут прожил прожила прожило прожили 1
прйбыть прибыл прибыла прибыло прибыли
2. Two generalizations сап immediately Ье made. First, the shifts just illus-
trated are the only ones that occur in conjugation. Second, the present tense
shift occurs only in suffixed verbs, the past tense shift only in nonsuffixed verbs.
Stated in another way: nonsuffixed verbs have fixed stress in the present and тау
have shift in the past; suffixed verbs have constant stress in the past and тау
have shift in the present. Notice the following exceptions:
а. The single nonsuffixed stem моtут and the НИМ subgroup of the
Й/М - НИМ nonsuffixed stem type have shifting stress in the present:
могу можешь могут; сниму снимешь снимут
мог(у~ has ending stress in the past (designated Ьу (,> over the ending.
Ь. Certain n/sA (suffixed) stems have shifting stress in the past tense and op-
tional shifting stress in the past passive participle. For n/sA i·erbs alone of suf-
fixed verbs, presence or absence of а stress mark indicates, respectively, fixed or
shifting stress in the past (and past passive participle, if the optional shifting
stress is used) rather than the present, whose stress is, in any case; unproЫemati
cal (always оп the ending):
1 Note corresponding past passive participle forms: прожит прожита прожито
прожиты. Cf. paragraph 10, pages 94-95.
92 SECТION 11: VERBS
Thus, with suffixed stems, the presence or absence of а stress mark refers
to the present tense; past tense stress is then inferaЫe therefrom.
5. In describing the stress of nonsuffixed stems, we сап use the same con-
vention: stress mark indicates fixed stress; absence of stress mark indicates
1 То save space, we shal\ henceforth omit neuter past and past passive participle forms,
which are a\ways the same as the corresponding masculine and plura\ forms.
2 The stress оп the prefixes in these past passive participle forms is not the "prefixal"
stress described above (for verbs like nрож11вут) but merely fixed or shifting, as the case may
Ье, and falls оп the prefix simply because of the rule described in paragraph 10, рр. 94-95.
3 Optional stress is indicated Ьу stress marks over each vowel involved.
4 Note that -овать implies -j·ют: арестовать, арестуют. The few primary ОВА verbs
6. In some verbs with nonsyllabic present tense stems we must place а stress
mark on the consonant preceding the ending to indicate the stem stress:
жмут implies жал жала жали
as opposed to
nий-ут implies пил пила пили
(Marking the basic form бий-ут would imply бил била били.)
1 А small group of anomalous verbs has stem stress in the past but ending stress in the
present. \Ve indicate this pattern Ьу placing а stress mark оп the consonant preceding the ending:
кладут: клал клала клали - кладу кладёшь ... кладут
стригут: стриг стригла стригли - стригу стрижёшь ... стригут
9. For both suffixed and nonsuffixed verbs, stress in the imperative and
present gerund is generally on the ending 1 unless marked on а stem vowel. Thus
вёдут implies ведя веди
but
мой-ут implies моя мой (и > zero when unstressed and not
помнить implies помня помни following two consonants; cf. р. 96.)
ставить implies ставя ставь
Similarly, stress in the past gerund and past active participle is on the final stem
vowel unless marked elsewhere. Thus
вёзут implies вёзши(й)
живут implies жив(ши(й))
мой-ут implies мьш(ши(й))
10. Stress in the past passive participle for nonsuffixed verbs follows the
past tense, including shift to а prefix if this happens in the past; for example:
на-денут implies надет надета надеты
про-вёдут implies проведён проведена проведень1
на-бий-ут implies набит набита набиты
> -
за-лии-ут залил залила залили implies залит залита залиты
>
по-йм-ут понял поняла поняли implies понят понята поняты
The past passive participle in suffixed stems has ending stress if the present has
ending stress and stem stress if the present tense has stem or shifting stress. 2 If
1 In general, in verbs with shifting stress, an ending consisting of а single vowe\ (-а, -i, -и)
is stressed (e.g. с,1отря, с,ютрп, смотрю).
2 However, quite а few stems with shifting stress violate this rule Ьу having ending-
the infinitive is in а(я)ть, 1 -еть, -путь, or -бть however, the stress is always on the
second vowel before any -н or -т. Thus
по-ставить implies поставлен поставлена -ы
and
при-говорить implies приговорён приговорена -Ьl
but
про-читай-ут прочитать
implies прочитан -а -ы
про-сидеть просидеть
implies просижен -а -ы
раз-вёрfнуть развернуть imp!ies развёрнут -а -ы
за-колоть заколоть implies заколот -а -ы
1 1. AII forms of any perfective verb in the prefix вы- are stressed on the
prefix, regardless of any other rules. For example:
вь1брать: вь1берут вь1бери вь1брал вь1брала вь1бран вь1брана
вь1говорить: вь1говорят вь1говори вь1говорил вь1говорила
вь1говорен вь1говорена
However, we shall see (page 97, paragraph 2) that it is important to know the in-
trinsic stress of the nonprefixed stem, even when dealing with а вы-prefixed per-
fective. For this reason, we not only place а stress mark on the вы- but also а
stress mark in parentheses <,> on whatever Ietter in the nonprefixed stem it would
naturally fall. We omit this second mark in the case of shifting stress, of course.
For example:
( ,)
if ставить then вь1ставить
(,)
if говорить then вь1говорить
if давить then вьщавить
if брать then вь1брать
(,)
if слать then вь1слать
1 Feminine past passive participle forms of n/sA stems with shifting stress do not, of
course, follow this rule, but as we have seen (р. 91), shifting stress is optional in the past pas-
sive participle, though mandatory in the past; hence, if we assume fixed stress in the past passive
participle, the rule is not broken. n/sA verbs with nonshifting stress, of course, follow the rule as
expected:
Fixed n/sA: послать: послан послана посланы
Shifting n/sA: собрать: собран собрана собраны (собрал собрала)
Note that this shifting stress is not prefixal, but merely shifting stress with nonfeminine forms
stressing the prefixal о in observance of the rule in paragraph 10 above. Cf. от/о/брать: отобран
отобрана отобраны with stress following the rule in paragraph 10.
96 SECTION 11: VERBS
Note that:
I. Verbs \Vhose present tense stem ends in j \ose -i (and have stem stress in
the imperative as а result) even when they are ending-stressed, except for ending-
stressed И verbs:
а. Primary stems in ОВА, which are ending-stressed:
ковать (куют)- куй (not *куй)
1 \Vhere ending stress is considered standard, \\·е п1ау mark the basic form ,vith stress in
parentheses оп -~я: Normal shifting stress is denoted, as usual, Ьу absence of а stress mark.
VERB INVENTOR У 97
2. The fact that the prefix вы- in perfectii-e verbs is always stressed does not
affect these rules; that is, if а stem normally keeps the ending -i, it will keep it
even when prefixed with вы. Thus
, ( ,) ,
выговорить - выговори since говорить - говори
вьщавить - вьщави since давить - дави
but
, ( ,) ,
выставить - выставь since ставить - ставь
3 Verb inventory
From а numerical standpoint, Russian verbs are not evenly distributed
over the twenty-three types in the taЫes. AII nonsuffixed stem types have ceased
to Ье productive, and the total number of nonsuffixed verbs (not counting pre-
fixed verbs) in ordinary use in modern Russian is well under one hundred. The
majority of the suffixed stem types have also ceased to Ье productive, although
they are somewhat better represented statistically. In contrast to the unproduc-
tive types are the И and ОВА types, each highly productive and including
thousands of verbs; the somewhat less productive but numerous НУ and ЕЙ
types; and the АЙ type, which has built, and is still building, thousands of de-
rived imperfectives.
The Verb lnventory оп pages 98-110 lists almost all common, unprefixed
stems within the unproductive types and representative examples from all the
productive types. Any subgroups within types are noted, and slight irregularities
are pointed out, but more drastically irregular verbs are listed separately at the
end of the Inventory.
Stems are given in unprefixed form whenever possiЫe. If а stem is never
used without а prefix, it is preceded Ьу а hyphen, and if it always or almost
always occurs with one prefix, this prefixed stem is given, together with its mean-
ing. The meanings we assign to unprefixed stems are as general as possiЫe and
are usually evident in prefixed stems as well; however, the student must learn to
anticipate various extensions and differentiations of meanings when he encount-
ers·prefixed examples later оп.
98 SECТION II: VERBS
The student should read through the lnventory now, \ooking at the informa-
tion given with the types, if any is given, but not attempt to memorize the verbs
or their meanings. The Inventory may Ье used frequently henceforth as а refer-
ence against which to check new stems that are encountered. This will Ье par-
ticularly important in analysis of prefixed stems, since а great many of these are
built with unproductive stems, almost all of which are in the Inventory.
After reading through it, the student should proceed to the exercises follow-
ing the Inventory, which will give some experience in using it.
VERBINVENTORY
NONSUFFIXED STEMS
SYLLABIC RESONANTS
в н
/Р /М-/Н Й/М-НИМ
м/р-ут die ж/м-ут press -йм-ут - -ним-ут The general
п/р-ут push ж/н-ут reap meaning is "take"; cf. the
за-п/р-ут lock м/н-ут crumple irregular stem в/о/зь-/ м-ут -
от/о/-п/р-ут uпlock рас-п/н-ут 2 crucify в/з-я-ть.
т/р-ут rub на-ч/н-ут begin
рас-про-ст /р-ут stretch
д т
з с
г к
NONSYLLABIC OBSTRUENTS
1 Basic root vowel о > е in the past active participle and past gerund.
- 2 Past active participle and past gerund are in -вш11й rather than -ш11ii; д is truncated.
100 SECTION 11 : VERBS
VERB INVENTORY
SUFFIXED STEMS
About fifty. Mostly intransitive. А number of them denote sounds. Among the com-
moner are:
блест-е-ть shine (intr) гляд-е-ть look at
бол-е-ть hurt (intr) гор-е-ть burn (intr)
Do not confuse with бол-ей-ут 'Ье звен-е-ть ring (intr)
sick.' кип-е-ть boil (intr)
вел-е-ть order лёт-е-ть fly (intr)
(command) свист-е-ть whistle
верт-е-ть turn (intr) сид-е-ть sit
вид-е-ть see скрип-е-т1, squeak
не-на-вид-е-ть hate смотр-е-ть look at
об-ид-е-ть (об-fид) insult терп-е-ть bear, endure
вис-е-ть hang (intr) храп-е-ть snore
за-вис-е-ть depend (NB шум-е-ть make noise
stress)
1 Mutation of а nonfinal stem consonant occurs in а few cases:
у-мертв-и-ть 'kill' ChS I sg pres умерщвлю, past perfective participle умерщ
влён, impf deriv умерщвляют
certain stems in -мь1сл-и-ть I sg pres -мь1слю but past perfective participle -мь1-
111лен, impf deriv -мышляют
2 -ч-11-ть < *-ц-11-ть exists in verbs like к611ч-и-ть 'end.'
VERB INVENTORY 101
ЖА
About thirty. Like the Е type above, to which they are historically related (see page 48),
жа verbs are mostly intransitive and include many verbs denoting sounds. Among the
commoner are:
визж-а-ть squeak сль1ш-а-ть hear
ворч-а-ть grumЫe стуч-а-ть knock
держ-а-ть ho\d торч-а-ть protrude
дрож-а-ть tremЫe трещ-а-ть crackle
дыш-а-ть breathe лёж-а-ть lie
звуч-а-ть sound молч-а-ть Ье silent
крич-а-ть cry, shout мч-а-ть rush (along)
пищ-а-ть squeak
Two stems in ЙА 1
бой-а-ть-ся fear стой-а-ть stand (intr)
About sixty with mutation and two small subgroups without mutation. Among the
commonest are:2
WIТH MUTATION
NO MUTATIO!',
А VERBS IN Я (Й-а)
About fifteen. Many of these stems have irregularities \\'hich we will mention (see foot-
notes 1-7, р. 103) rather than listing the stems as irregular (see р. 87). Absence of
stress mark sigпifies shifting stress in the past; present stress is on eпding (cf. р. 91).
б/р-а-ть 1 take д/р-а-ть 1 flay
в/р-а-ть (tell) lie ж/д-а-ть wait
1 е inserted before voca\ic ending.
VERБ INVENTORY 103
FOREJGN 1
бор-о-ть-ся fight
кол-о-ть thrust, stab
мол-о-ть grind (See irregular stems, р. 112.)
пол-о-ть weed
пор-о-ть flog, rip
НУ (Productive)
The НУ suffix is the only Russian verbal suffix that begins in а consonant, and а
final root consonant, in older verbs, may Ье lost Ьefore it, so that the root appears to
end in а vowel; the consonant usually appears in related and derived imperfectives
which do not contain ну (see below and cf. Section 1, page 39).
The НУ type is also unique among Russian verbs in that the suffix, with four ex-
ceptions, builds perfective verbs. However, the ну not only has perfective meaning but
in most cases 2 gives the verb an additional "semelfactive " 3 meaning (expressing action
as instantaneous or single in occurrence, without repetition or continuation). Semel-
factive НУ verbs are unprefixed; the addition of а prefix normally voids semelfactive
meaning.
Within semelfactive НУ verbs we may isolate two types: an older unproductive
type and а newer productive type. Generally speaking, the older type (1) may have
either stem or ending stress; (2) may have а consonant disappearing before ну; and (3)
has one or more prefixed НУ verbs corresponding to it (i.e. in the same root):
1 А large number of verbs in -11рова- correspond to French verbs in -er or -ir and/or
German verbs in -ieren. These verbs include а fairly large group in -11311рова- based on French
-iser, German -isieren, or English -ize, and with the same meaning.
2 For example, вёрf-11у-ть 'return,' кос-11у-ть-ся 'touch,' and а few others may Ье re-
(по for а short time, эа beginning of action) into а category we designate as suЬ!exical (see
р. 118).
VERBINVENTORY 105
I Soviet dictionaries vary consid&aЬly, both among themselves and within а given dic-
tionary, in assigning semelfactive status (Russ однократный глагол) to verbs of the older type
and list many of them simply as perfective partners of related imperfectives. Yet most of them
are clearly more than simply perfectives, and all semelfactives are properly regarded as а separ-
ate suЫexical class. Space forЬids а more detailed treatment here.
2 Except for а special group with "acoustic" meanings, which usually have stem stress:
UNPREFIXED IMPERFECТIVES
The four unprefixed imperfective НУ verbs in the modern, standard language are:
r/ф-ну-ть bend
ль/f!-Н)'-ТЬcling to
тор-ну-ть drown (intr)
Cf. топ-и-ть 'drown' (tran).
тяf-ну-ть pull
PREFIXED PERFECТIVES
We have already mentioned that prefixed НУ verbs do not normally have semel-
factive meaning. Most of them correspond to existing unprefixed НУ verbs of the older
type descriЬed above. Below we give examples corresponding to the unprefixed ex-
amples of that type. Derived imperfectives are listed in parentheses (note that conso-
nants lost before the ну are "recovered "):
за-вёрf-ну-ть за-вёрт-ывай-ут wrap
за-г/ф-ну-ть за-гиб-ай-ут bend up (or down)
вз-гляJ-ну-ть вз-гляд-ывай-ут glance
с-дви(-ну-ть с-двиг-ай-ут shift
от-дёрf-ну-ть от-дёрг-ивай-ут pull back
вз-дрог-ну-ть вз-драг-ивай-ут start
по-киj-ну-ть по-кид-ай-ут leave (tran)
при-кос-ну-ть-ся при-кос-ай-ут-ся touch
вс-крик-ну-ть вс-крик-ивай-ут shriek
при-ль/ф-ну-ть при-лип-ай-ут cling to
, (,)i
вы-плю -ну-ть вы-плёв-ывай-утl spit out
в-суf-ну-ть в-сов-ывай-ут 1 thrust in
на-т/к-ну-ть-ся на-тык-ай-ут-ся stumЫe on
от-толк-ну-ть от-талк-ивай-ут push away
за-троf-ну-ть за-траг-ивай-ут broach, touch on
за-тяf-ну-ть за-тяг-ивай-ут tighten
пере-шаr-ну-ть пере-шаr-ивай-ут step over
1 плюй > 1~лёв and cyii > сов before vowel (cf. discussion under ОВА verbs, р. 103).
VERB INVENTORY 107
Disappearing (НУ)
Mostly intransitive. The approximately sixty (НУ) verbs share two formal charac-
teristics: stress fixed on the root and the loss of ну in the past tense, past gerund, and
past active participle, though forms with ну are occasionally found in all ofthese forms;
e.g. сбх-(ну)-ть 'become dry' сбх сбхла сбхшн(й) are normal, but сохнул may also
Ье found. There are two types of (НУ) verbs:
r. U nprefixed imperfectives denoting some sort of changing state or becoming.
Such stems may Ье nonsemanticallyperfectivized Ьу prefixation, often with по- or о-;
in such cases, ну is a/ways dropped; i.e. ослеп, never ослепнул. The unprefixed stems
are somewhat rare in the past:
1 See р. 27.
2 It may Ье noted that when а (НУ) verb loses the ну, it in effect becomes an obstruent
stem and acts like one; e.g. loses the -л in the masculine past, except after а final root д or т,
which are truncated before endings in л; takes -ши(й) rather than -вши(й) in the past active
participle and past gerund; takes aj in imperfective derivation; builds verbal nouns in -ениё
with mutation of velars. Compare the following stems-a Г/К obstruent with а (НУ) vowel
stem:
GERUND VERBAL
PAST INFINПIVE PARТICIPLE IMPERFECТIVE NOUN
по-стриr-ут постриг постричь постригши(й) постригают пострижение
consecrate а постригла
monk/nun
до-стиr-(ну)-ть ДОСТИГ достичь достиrши(й) достигают достижение
achieve достигла (alt inf)
NOTE: Some stems, however, may form the past active participle Ьу adding -вший to ну; e.g.
ИС-ЧеЗ-( НУ )•ТЬ - ИСЧеЗН)'ВШIIЙ.
108 SECТION 11: VERBS
2. Stems which rarely occur in unprefixed form. Many of these verbs are of
Church Slavonic origin. Only а few of them have the "becoming" meaning of the
verbs in paragraph I above. Past tense, past active participle, and past gerund usually
drop ну but may retain it iг.. some forms. In imperfective derivation the ну is dropped
and the suffix aj is added. Here are some of the more common examples:
The great majority of АЙ stems, however, are imperfectives derived Ьу one of the
three suffixes: aj, vaj, or ivaj (for а full treatment of imperfective derivation see page
134):
по-втор-яй-ут derived from perfective по-втор-и-ть
о-де-вай-ут derived from perfective о-ден-ут
с-праш-ивай-ут derived from perfective с-прос-и-ть
The productivity of АЙ extends itself to at least one other category: the -н-ич-ай verbs
deri ved f rom -ей- ; see page 146.
ЕЙ
АВАЙ
There are only three stems, but all of them have many compounds. All three form
imperfective verbs when prefixed; they are, in fact, in origin imperfectives built with
vaj from the corresponding stems which form the prefixed perfectives:
дай - дад - -да-вай: про-да-ть - про-да-ва-ть sell
> ,
по-да-ть - по-да-ва-ть serve
-стан - -ста-вай: у-стан-ут - у-ста-ва-ть get tired
пере-стан-ут - пере-ста-ва-ть stop
-знай - -зна-вай: у-знай-ут - у-зна-ва-ть find out
при-знай-ут - при-зна-ва-ть recognize
Irregular stems
The verbs listed here deviate in some way from the patterns in the Verb ТаЫе;
i.e. some oftheir forms are unpredictaЫe from the rules given there or exhiblt other un-
predictaЫe changes affecting more than one form. In almost all cases, however, we can
treat them as belonging to one of our types; we will note the discrepancies, and every-
thing else is regular in terms of the type to which we assign the irregular stem. For
example, клян-ут Н: infinitive клясть, shifting stress, imperfective derivation -клина
ют; but in every other way it is like Н: кляну, клянут, кляни, клял, кляла, кляш1,
клявший, -клят; or сяд-ут Д- Т: я > е before С: сесть, сел, села, past active parti-
ciple севший (not *сядший), but in every other way it is а regular (stem-stressed) ob-
struent in Д - Т: сяду, сядут, сядь, past stress сел, села, etc. Only two verbs, дад-ут -
дать 'give' and ед-ят - ес-ть 'eat,' are regarded as completely anomalous.
Verbs with only isolated irregularities (а single form deviating in some way) are
not included here; such irregularities have in most cases been listed with the individual
verb in the Inventory. Nor do we list here the several rather irregular n/sA stems; the
divergences in those types were noted in that section. In addition, the two nonsyllablc
obstruents ж/г-ут - жечь 'burn' and -ч/т-ут - -честь •consider' are considered regu-
Iar and are given with the obstruents; the third nonsyllablc obstruent йд-ут 'go' has
several irregularities and is given below.
YERB INYENTORY 111
RESONANTS
клян-ут н curse: inf клясть, shifting stress, impf deriv -клина.ют
брей-ут й shave: е > и before С: брить, брил, брила, бривший,
-брит; impf deriv -бривают
пой-ут й sing: о > е before С: петь, пел, пела, певший, -пет;
impf deriv -певают
возь-м-ут Й/М-НИМ take: возьм > в/зя before С: взять, взял, взяла,
взяли, взявший, взят
при-м-ут Й/М-НИМ receive: (при-йм-ут) shifting stress in pres приму, при
мут
OBSTRUENTS
буд-ут Д-Т Ье: буд > бы
before С: бьпь, бьш, была, бьшо, бь1-
вший, -быт; stem stress in pres буду, будут, impv
будь, pres ger будучи, impf deriv -бывают
ед-ут Д-Т ride: ед > еха before С: ехать, ехал, ехала, ехавший,
impv поезжай, pres ger поезжая, prefixed impf in
-езжают (based on ездить)
йд-ут Д-Т go: (й > и in initial position) inf идти (instead of
*исти), шёл, шла, etc., шедший, ррр prefixal or
ending stress; e.g. найден, найдена, найдены ог
обойдён, обойдена, обойдень1
Note при-д-ут соте: (при-йд-ут) inf прийти; other prefixed perfective
in -йд, have inf also in -ити, and prefixed impf in
-ходить
сяд-ут Д-Т sit down: я > е before С: сесть, сел, села; рар севший
(not *седший); impf deriv -седа.ют
раст-ут Д-Т grow: раст > рос before all С except > рас before
-ти: рос, росла, росший, but расти
лягSj/тl Г-К Jie down: я > ё before С: лечь, лёг, легла, легли, stem
stress in pres лягу, лягут; impf deriv -легают
толк-ут Г-К pound: ол > ол6 before all С except -ла, -ло, -ли:
тол6чь,тол6к,толкла,толкл6,толкли,тол6кший
VOWEL STEMS
род-и-ть И give Ьirth: perf родил, родила, родило, родили (vs.
impf normal stress on ил throughout) .
род-и-ть-ся И Ье born: perf родился, родилась, родилось, родиш'tсь
(vs. impf normal stress on ил throughout)
1 See Excursus, р. 91, for discussion of stress mark on -Yt.
112 SECTION 11 : VERBS
ANOMALOUS
дад-ут give: дам, дашь, даст, дадим, дадите, дадут; дай; дать, дал, дала, дало,
давший, дан, дана, дань,, impf deriv АВАЙ (see Verb Inventory)
ед-ят eat: ем, ешь, ест, едим, едите, едят; ешь; есть, ел, ела, евший, -еден, impf
deriv -едают
EXERCISES
Classification and conjugation drilf.l For the following sixty basic forms (pre-
fixes boldface):
1. Classify as to general type (as given in the Verb ТаЫе) and specific type (e.g.
кроют is а syllabic resonant, ОЙ (or мбй-ут) type).
2. For verbs marked "I" give the infinitive and masculine, feminine, and
plural of past tense.
3. For verbs marked "2" give the first and second singular and the third
plural of the present tense.
4. Give the imperative.
1 This exercise may Ье handled in various ways, depending оп how thoroughly the teacher
plans to do the verbs. For recognition and classification of type only, he may restrict himself to
assigning instruction 1, although it is recommended that, in addition, he ask for the infinitive or
third plura\ (disregarding stress), whichever the form isn't, so that the student сап make the
most important associations, even if he does not learn how to conjugate fully in terms of this
system. For complete mastery of the system, he assigns all instructions (1 to 6).
For testing how wel\ persons who already know Russian have mastered these systems, it
may Ье best to use hypothetical (nonextant) basic forms: e.g. *пр1шрёкут, *налузать, *от/о/
брут, etc. The same procedure may Ье followed in subsequent exercises as well.
EXERCISES 113
5. For verbs given with а prefix give the masculine, feminine, and plural short
forms of the past passive participle. Omit this instruction for the items
marked t.
6. Give the past active participle. Omit this instruction for the item marked t.
зароют I 2 сдавить 2 отскрёбут r 2
nриплётут r 2 приший-ут 1 2 молчать 2
оплакать I 2 натягнуть 1 2 вспороть I 2
затро/нуть r 2 стёсать 2 роптать 2 ChS
, (,)
выдумают r сковать 2 передавай- r 2 t
глупеют I нагреют 1 жалеют 1
продиктовать 2 терпеть 2 начнут 1 2
остерёrут r 2 замрут 1 2 t отыграют 1
утратить 2 отвлёкут r 2 обма1нуть 1 2
с/о/жнут r 2 крадут I 2 t сознавай- 1 2 t
лететь 2 6бнимут I 2 охладить 2 ChS
, (,}
потрясут r 2 высмеять 1 2 запретить 2 ChS
дышать r 2 горёвать 2 загородить 2
об/лий-ут r 2 1 займут креп(ну)ть 1 2
залезут I 2 t прополоскать 2 порвать I 2
заслужить r 2 приставай- 1 2 t от/о/слать r 2
разгрызут I 2 расстроить 2 плывут 1 2
проник(ну)ть 1 2 ОЧИСТИТЬ 2 отдавай- I 2 t
врать 1 2 простоять 1 2 раз/вий-ут I 2
от/о/прут 1 2 вь1рубить 2 с/о/драть 1 2
ldentijication and recovery dri/1. The following words are forms of nonderived
imperfective and prefixed (prefixes boldface) perfective verbs. For each form
try to identify the verb type and recover the basic form (ignoring stress unless
it is inferaЫe from the form) as best you сап without resorting to the Inven-
tory, then check the Inventory for the correct basic form (Ье sure to suЬtract the
prefix when looking for а basic form) of all but the examples marked with the
symbol t, which belong to productive types and are not in the Inventory. Do
not forget to take into acc~unt vowel-zero alternations, particularly in pre-
fixes, when recovering the basic forms.
мести inf сшей impv измят ррр
торгуют З pl ньш m past пльпь inf
стеречь inf дерём r pl осуждён ррр t
пляшут З pl ограблен ррр t соблюли pl past
1 The actual third plural form here contains а moЬile о, since ий > ьй before the always
stressed vocalic endings of ИЙ verbs: раз/о/бьют. Cf. Verb ТаЫе, р. 86.
114 SECTION 11: VERBS
1 We have already observed (р. 104) that most simplex perfective НУ verbs should not Ье
regarded as forming true aspectual pairs with the correlated imperfectives, since they have an
additional, semelfactive meaning. The semelfactive ну suffix forms а separate suЫexical cate•
gory (cf. р. 118).
2 These simplex stems are unusual among И verbs in that their imperfectives do not show
mutation before the aj suffix. Those same stems, when prefixed, fail to mutate before the ivaj
suffix (where all other И stems mutate). For а more complete statement оп this phenomenon
see р. 136.
SIMPLEX STEMS 115
and three verbs with imperfectives built from the same stem:
дадут (дать)- давать give
денут - девают put
падут - падают fall (perf often упадут)
This group includes а very small number of stems in ОВА (mostly of Church
Slavonic origin):
даровать give, present образовать form
and а large number of foreign stems in ОВА:
2 Verbal prefixes
I. Prefixation and the question of aspect pairs
With certain limited 2 exceptions the addition of а prefix to а simplex im-
perfective stem perfectivizes that stem. In traditional analysis and most grammar
books а prefix is either "nonsemantic" or "semantic": if the former, it merely
perfectivizes the stem and is regarded as the perfective "partner" of the imper-
fective verb:
строить построить build писать написать write
(imperfective)," but the seventeen-volume Academy dictionary says that the present tense
forms are not used.
2 А prefix added to а nondetermined verb stem does not, of course, ordinarily perfectivize
it; e.g. проходить 'go through.' А number of other verbs, many of them of Church Slavonic
origin (note prefixes) or calques from Western European Ianguages a\so remain imperfective;
e.g. состоять 'consist,' содержать 'contain,' nредв11деть 'foresee,' вь1г,1яАеtь 'look like,'
зав11сеть 'depend,' исследовать 'investigate,' содействовать 'assist,' принадлежать 'be-
long.' The prefix со-, а calque from the Latin со- 'со- (with),' also does not perfectivize а stem:
существовать 'exist' and сосуществовать •coexist' are both imperfective.
VERBAL PREFIXES ll7
if the \atter, it not only perfectivizes but also alters the meaning of the stem and
does not have it as а partner. lfit is to have an imperfective, it must build its own
with an imperfectivizing suffix:
А given prefix тау Ье nonsemantic for one stem but semantic for another:
делают do сделают do
просить ask (request) спросить ask (information) (спрашивают)
Most dictionaries and grammars also list verbs like читают and прочитают and
пий-ут and вьший-ут as aspectual pairs, even when noting the existence of derived
"second" imperfectives like прочитывают and выпивают. That verbs like
строить and построить and писать and написать are "perfective" pairs is taken
for granted, and the natural aspectual "pairedness" of Russian verbs in general
is assumed.
More recent and closer analysis suggests, however, that the actua\ relation-
s\1ip governing verbal aspect may Ье quite different and certainly more complex
than the above structure implies. For one thing, а strong argument against the
basic aspectual pairedness of all Russian verbs is the very large number of Rus-
sian verbs which are clearly unpaired impe1·fectives: лёжать, стоять, работают,
имеют, спать, курить, to say nothing of many verbs from Church Slavonic or
foreign origin (\oan translations) which are unpaired imperfectives even though
they consist of prefix plus а stem which does not end in an imperfectivizing
suffix: предвидеть, содержать, состоять, сосуществовать. For another,
statistically speaking, prefixation as а means of creating perfectives comЬining
to form pairs such as стро1пь - построить, писать - написать, and so оп, is
dwarfed Ъу imperfective derivation (устроить - устраивать, записать - записы
вают), and the number of prefixes which тау serve as nonsemantic perfectiviz-
ers is very limited; по and с/ are the only prefixes which appear in what seems to
Ье а nonsemantic role with any regularity. Recent studies in fact have voiced
doubt as to whether even cases like строить - построить and делают - сделают
comprise true aspectual pairs, assigning to the prefixes in these cases "resu\ta-
tive" rather than purely perfective meaning. 1 This type of analysis considers that
prefixation never results in mere perfectivization but a\ways changes or modifies
the meaning and considers suffixal imperfective derivation to Ье the only process
producing true aspectua\ pairs.
1 ln particular, А. Isacenko, Die mssiscl1e Sprac/1e der Gegenwart, Halle, 1962, р. 363.
Isacenko's views оп aspect in general and оп Aktionsarteп are discussed оп рр. 347-418.
118 SECTION 11: VERBS
PREFIXAL PERFECTIVIZAПON
Do not build derived Some types may bui\d Do build derived im-
imperfective derived imperfectives perfectives
1 lsacenko, ор. cit., р. 359 and elsewhere.
VERBAL PREFIXES 119
Note that certain prefixed perfectives may exist in both aspectual and sub-
/exical meanings:
, ,,,.Ahink (perf of думают) (aspectual)
подумают
плакать weep
заплакать start to weep
за BEGINNING OF ACTION (INCEPПVE)
писать \Vrite
пописать write for а while
по АСПОN FOR А (SHORT) ПМЕ
сидеть sit
просидеть sit for (through) а specific period
про ACTION FOR А SPECIFIC PERIOD OF ПМЕ
говорить talk
разrовориться warm to one's topic
раз+ -ся GROWTH OF ACTION (INТENSПY)
The question of suЫexical categories is а very complex one 1 and space for-
Ьids а more detailed discussion here. It may Ье added that suffixation, as well as
prefixation, plays а role in creating suЫexical categories: we have already men-
tioned one of the most important types, the semelfactive ну suffix, under НУ
verbs in the Verb Inventory and we may note, in addition, the iterative suffix ivaj
"action now and then (used mostly in the past tense)" and ivaj used with the
prefix по also with iterative meaning, but with а slight deintensification of the
action, often with а connotation of leisure or casualness.
in colloquial speech or at certain style levels than in standard or stylistically neutral language.
VERBAL PREFIXES 121
In cases where the prefix introduces а change which is felt as lexical, а de-
rived imperfective may Ье built to correspond to the perfective. One might then
build the verbal "triangles":
вь1учить раз/бий-ут
Note, however, that the real aspectual pairs are вь1учить - выучивают and
раз/бий-ут - разбивают. The вы added to учить is а lexical category (successful
conclusion: "learn" instead of "study "), and раз/ adds the lexical meaning of
dispersion, dis- (" break into pieces "). Hence one might better diagram the verbs
as follows:
учить ........ вь1учить бий-ут ........ раз/бий-ут
1 1
выучивают разбивают
where solid lines connect aspectual partners and dotted lines connect imperfec-
tives with lexical or suЫexical perfectives.
The perfectives научить and побий-ут may Ье regarded as "true perfectives"
(only, of course, for those particular meanings of учить and бий-ут) or as be-
longing to а "resultative" suЫexical category. Пробий-ут тау Ье considered
suЫexical prefixation if the action is regarded in terms of а specific time period
covered, or as lexical to the extent that the general meaning "through" is dis-
associated from time (notaЫy, in its purely spatial sense 'break through ').
Indeed, it is frequently diffi.cult to decide whether а given prefixed perfective
should Ье characterized as lexical or suЫexical. The possiЬility of formation of а
derived imperfective, which is sometimes adduced to prove the presence of а
new "independent" meaning is an unreliaЫe criterion, for many о bviously sub-
lexical types are сараЫе of forming derived imperfectives, whether or not dic-
tionaries list all of them. 1 In the case of many prefixes, suЫexical and lexical
meanings will seem to overlap, and one тау argue over whether а lexical change
has taken place or whether the action has merely been modified in some way
with respect to time or intensity. In the Prefix ТаЫе on pages 123-133 it will Ье
noted, however, that the English words given (like the Russian prefixes to which
they correspond) often include both lexical and suЫexical senses; for example:
1 In the case of suЬ\exical про-, for instance, dictionaries differ greatly as to whether they
list derived imperfectives and which ones they list. Native speakers readily accept derived im-
perfectives of про- types. The process of imperfective derivation is, in fact, so productive, that
speakers may easily create many types which might Ье regarded as theoretically "impossiЫe"
and not included in dictionaries.
122 SECTION II : VERBS
LEXICAL SUBLEXICAL
Here the lexical and suЬ\exica\ meanings are closely re\ated. When this is true,
we list both meanings together in the Prefix ТаЬ\е. In any case, pending а more
exact and convincing definition ofwhat \exica\ and suЬ\exical categories are, and
for pedagogical reasons as well, it seems best to emphasize the connections
between the various meanings of а prefix rather than iпsist on rigid distinc-
tions.
3. Latin prefixes
The meaning of а prefixed verb is sometimes brought into c\earer focus Ьу
translating the prefix into Latin. For example, it is often more useful to approach
а Russian verb prefixed with раз/ with dis- or de- in mind than with the English
ип- or with various words such as "disperse" or "divide" which attempt to sum
up the meaning. Observe:
рас-по-лож-и-ть dispose раз-дад-ут distribute
рас-крбй-ут disclose рас-стрбй-и-ть disturb
Similarly, one often gets c\oser to the meaning with trans- for пере or е-/ех- for
вы or 11з/ than with the English equivalents. Sometimes the Latin prefix may
suggest the meaning, even if the ultimate rendition does not actually contain
it:
пере-вёд-ут translate
пере-став-и-ть "trans-place" rearrange, transpose
из-вин-и-ть excuse
вь1-брать elect
раз-знакбм-и-ть-ся "dis-acquaint" break off with
раз-уч-и-ть-ся "de-learn" forget how to do
Translation ofthe prefix into Latin works particularly well, of course, in the
case of Latin ca/ques (discussed on page 19) consisting of root plus prefix. Such
words are ultimately from Latin, often through the medium of German, French,
etc. Examples:
в-вёд-ут introduce, (Fr) introd11i1·e, (Ger) einfii/,ren
в-ключ-и-ть include, (Fr) inclure, (Ger) einschliessen
со-в-пад-ут coincide, (Fr) coincider, (Ger) Zufa/1 'coincidence'
VERBAL PREFIXES 123
4. Prefix tаЬ!е
Most verbal prefixes have primary meanings of а physical, directional, or
spatial nature, often close to the meanings of the prepositions, to which they are
historically related (except for вз/(воз), вы, низ/, пере (пре), and раз/, all the
verbal prefixes have corresponding prepositions). Besides these primary mean-
ings, however, many prefixes have one or, in some cases, several abstract mean-
ings, whose connection with the primary sense may vary from obvious or remote
to unestaЫishaЫe. The prefix на has а physical-spatial meaning in на-йд-j"т
•соте on/upon; (somewhat more abstract) find,' an abstract meaning in
на-стой-а-ть 'insist (stand оп)' and а sense quite remote from "оп" in на
дед-ай-ут 'do (something) in quantity.'
The following pages give the most important meanings of the prefixes, to-
gether with examples. The primary meaning is given first (usually а verb in йд)
and then the more abstract meanings. Meanings which may Ье regarded as sub-
lexical, at least in the case of certain verbs, are so designated, but individual
verbs are not thus specified. Where appropriate, Latin meanings are given and
italicized, and in the English definitions of the examples, adverbs corresponding
to Russian prepositions are also italicized.
PREFIX Т ABLE
В/
вы
, .... (,)
r. out, ех вы-ид-ут go out, exit
,
вы-вед-ут
. (,)
lead out; deduce
вь1-пис-а-ть write out; extract
вь1-сказ-а-ть say out, express
вь1-бр-а-ть choose, elect
2. do or finish successfully вь1-игр~~й-ут win (out)
(idea "out" may Ье
, ( ,)
вы-дум-аи-ут
- invent
present) вь1-уч-и-ть learn Ьу heart
3. finish (suЬ!exical (also вьший-ут drink up
вь1 . .. ся) (idea "out" вьrкур-и-ть finish smoking
may Ье present)) вь1-сп-а-ть-ся sleep oneself out
ДО
ЗА
За is рrоЬаЫу the most versatile and difficult of the prefixes. Exhaustive analysis
results in а great many categories with greatly divergent meanings impossiЫe to group
under one or two broad but unifying concepts, as may Ье done with the other prefixes.
Here are some of the most common meanings, with examples:
1. with verbs of motion: за-йд-ут drop in (on the way)
alter course за-нёс-ут drop off (on the way)
за-ступ-и-ть-ся intercede, step in
за-йд-ут go far; go Ьeyond
(limits)
за-беж-а-ть run far, run ahead
2. fix or make permanent за-креп-и-ть fasten
Ьу some action за-нёс-ут record, enter
за-пис-а-ть write down
за-яв-и-ть declare, state
за-лож-и-ть found
VERBAL PREFIXES 125
3. acquisition за-раб6т-ай-ут earn
за-служ-и-ть deserve
> -
за-им-ут take, occu ру
Cf. 4 below.
за-вой-ова-ть acquire/win Ьу conquest
за-хват-и-ть take, seize
4. close, Ыосk, fill за-кр6й-ут close
> -
за-им-ут occupy, take
Cf. З above.
за-дел-ай-ут stop up, close off
за-п6лн-и-ть fill up, fill out (as forms)
за-ключ-и-ть imprison; conclude
5. subject to extreme or за-дар-и-ть Ioad or overload with
excessive action gifts
за-корм-и-ть overfeed
за-хвал-и-ть praise excessively
за-цел-ова-ть cover with (too many)
kisses
6. за ... ся do very intense- за-дум-ай-ут-ся become Iost in thought
!у; overdo (suЫexical) за-уч-и-ть-ся study too much
за-сид-е-ть-ся sit for (over) long time
за-чит-ай-ут-ся get engrossed in reading
7. begin to (suЫexical) за-плак-а-ть begin to cry
за-rовор-и-ть begin to speak
за-пой-ут(-пе-ть) begin to sing
ИЗ/ (ChS) 1
I. out, ех ис-ход-и-ть originate, proceed from
(impf only)
из-беж-а-ть avoid
>
из-дад-ут puЫish
ис-п6лн-и-ть carry out, execute
2. do to an extreme, to из-бий-ут beat unmercifully
exhaustion (out) (sub- из-нос-и-ть wear out (clothes)
lexical) из-муч-и-ть torture, .exhaust
1 нз/ is the Church Slavonic equivalent of the Russian вы. This accounts for the near
identity of the meanings of the two prefixes and for the somewhat more abstract character of
verbs in из/.
126 SECTION 11 : VERBS
НА
НАД
НЕДО (не-до)
ОБ/-0
об/ - о is one of the two most common factitive prefixes and is a\so used to perfectiv-
ize certain verbs of "becoming" in the suffix ej. Both questions are treated in subsection
В 5 -Ье\оw.
128 SECTION II : VERBS
ОТ/
по
под
ПРЕД (ChS)
before, for(e); pre пред-вид-е-ть /oresee (impf only)
пред-лож-и-ть put forward, propose
пред-став-и-ть present, represent
пред-по-чт-ут prefer
пред is added to а number пред-о-предел-и-ть predetermine
of prefixed perfectives and пред-у-rад-ай-ут guess beforehand
has the same denotation.
ПРИ
ПРО
РАЗ/t
С/- СО (ChS)
1. down с/о/-йд-ут go down, descend
с-лож-и-ть ]ау down, put down
с-пуст-и-ть-(ся) lower (descend)
с-раз-и-ть strike down, kill
2. away, off (from) с-ним-ут take off
с-нёс-ут carry away/off
с-мест-и-ть displace
с-пуст-и-ть release, let away
3. together, соп (сот, со/, с/о/-йд-ут-ся 1 соте together
etc.) There are many с-нёс-ут bring together
verbs of ChS origin and с-лож-и-ть put/lay toкether, сот-
Western European loan pose
translations in со- со-бр-а-ть gather, co/lect
rather than с/. This со- со-зв-а-ть call together, convoke
often does not perfec- со-глас-и-ть-ся 1 agree, consent
tivize а stem but is со-в-мест-и-ть comblne
simply added to verbs со-в-пад-ут coincide
of either aspect. (Note со-стой-а-ть consist
also с . .. ся reciprocal: со-держ-а-ть contain
с/о/йд-ут-ся 'соте to- со-чув-ств-ова-ть sympathize
gether,' and others.) со-от-вет-ств-ова-ть correspond
со-сущ-е-ств-ова-ть coexist
4. Semelfactive meaning: Imperfective stems denoting actions or characteristics com-
posed of many single actions; the single action or manifestation of а characteristic
through а single action is then expressed Ьу semelfactive с/, just as а single shout is
expressed Ьу semelfactive -11у-: кр11к-11у-ть •shout once' vs. кр11ч-а-ть 'shout'
(general meaning or characteristic). Two verb types which frequently take semel-
factive с/ are:
а. -н-ичай-ут2 Ье,act the, play the (designating а frequent action or
characteristic-often pejorative)
1 The derived imperfectives of some of those verbs (and of а few verbs in other prefixes
suggesting successful completion, as вы, до) may, in addition to their normal imperfective
meaning, i.e. "do successfully ," also have the sense "try to do successfully":
/persuade
уговорить persuade уговаривают
"-....try to persuade
/prove
доказать prove доказывают"-....
try to prove
Compare, for example, осмотреть 'examine fsubmit to looking)' with
2 усмотреть 'per-
ceive. (submit to looking successfully).'
134 SECTION II: VERBS
of the meanings given; e.g. вс-крик-ну-ть 'shriek' both "up" and "intensity of
action "; вь1-прос-и-ть 'wheedle' both "out" and "successful"; под-сказ-а-ть
'prompt' at least two or three of the meanings listed under под. As with certain
roots, the student gains with experience а certain intuitive grasp of the meanings
of the prefixes which aids him more than verbalization of" the meanings.
Many prefixed verbs are not worth analyzing, either because the prefix
defies categorization entirely, or because its categorization would make it neces-
sary to set up а prohiЬitively large number of meanings for the prefix (the prob-
lem we noted with за). Analysts тау differ as to whether а prefix in а given stem
is meaningful or not. Here are some verbs which are not worth analyzing in
terms of the above system:
изменить change заставить force
>
нальют pour покроют cover
>
продадут sell рассказать tell
приказать order показать show
(,)
спросить ask помогут help
забудут forget устанут get tired
3 lmperfective derivation
The addition of а prefix which alters а stem lexically raises the obvious
question of how to obtain а new imperfective to go with the new perfective. А
similar proЫem arises when we add а prefix other than по to the stem of а deter-
mined motion verb, in which case the new imperfective is obtained Ьу adding the
prefix to the stem of the corresponding nondetermined verb; e.g. вёдут - при
вёдут - приводить. Here а different stem is used to make the imperfective. For
the overwhelming majority of stems other than determined motion verb stems,
however, Russian makes imperfectives from the same stem, extended Ьу one of
three imperfectivizing formants:
The spelling of the initial vowel in cij and 'ivaj depends, of course, on the nature
of the precediпg consonant, which itself usually depends on whether or not mu-
IMPERFECТIVE DERIVATION 135
tation has taken place (see paragraph I below). Note that all three formants
define the stress of the imperfectives they derive:
остави djut > оставляют
спроси 'ivaj-ut > спрашивают
оден vdj-ut > одевают
except that with АЙ, НУ, and (НУ) stems, the entire verbal formant is truncated,
and any imperfectivizing formant is added directly to the root; for example:
передел# 'ivaj-ut > переделывают 1 redo
вздрогМ 'ivaj-ut > вздрагивают shudder
привь1к(,i) aj-111 > привыкают get used to
1 Note that if the perfective basic form is in -яют rather than -ают, the derived imperfec-
tive is -ивают rather than -ывают:
разменяют разменивают change
2The -ивают (rather than -ывают) in imperfectives derived from verbs in -рить, -.111ть,
аnd--н11ть shows that mutation has occurred (cf. р. 46).
136 SECTION П: VERBS
but
записать- записывать write down
(,) ,
помогут - помогают help
отпороть - отпарывают rip off
А number оfИ stems do not mutate before 'ii·aj; notaЫy compounds ofthe five
simplex stems which did not mutate before tij (footnote 2, р. 114) but also а few
other И stems which build 'ivaj stems based оп nonmutated related simplex
verbs, usually in АЙ:
сбросить - сбрасывают throw down бросают throw
схватить - схватывают grasp хватают grasp
закусить - закусывают have а snack кусают Ьite
переломить - переламывают break in two ломают break
отскочить - отскакивают jump away скакать jump
вьпащить - вытаскивают pull out таскают pull
А handful of verbs built with tij also fail to observe mutation:
разрубить - разрубают cut, chop
Conversely, consonant mutation is very occasionally observed outside of И
stems:
просидеть - просиживают sit through
рассмотреть - рассматривают examine
2. Vон·е/ shift о > а. А final root vowel о shifts to а before the formant
'ivaj, but not before other formants:
спросить - спрашивают ask
вздрогнуть - вздрагивают shudder
переломают - переламывают break in two
but
( ,) ,
помогут - помогают help
умножить - умножают multiply
А few verbs, most of them rather bookish in character, resist this shift:
сосредоточить - сосредоточивают concentrate
обусловить - обусловливают stipulate; cause
обуславливают also exists.
This vowel shift does not take place in ОВА verbs:
арестовать - арестовывают arrest
сковать - сковывают forge
IMPERFECТIVE DERIVATION 137
3. Vои·е/
insertion. Nonsyllabic stems insert i between consonants. Non-
syllaЬic resonants always have 11, and n/sA and nonsyllaЬic НУ stems have II or
ы (in this book we assume 11, unless ы is specified):
умрут - умирают die
пожмут - пожимают press
вь1брать - выбирают elect
назвать(ы} - называют name
прильфнуть - прилипают cling
замкнуть(ы) - замыкают lock
4. Stems in й/м - ним add tij to ним for both types; for example:
OBSTRUENT STEMS: aj
И dj or 'ivaj
оставить - оставляют leave
спросить - спрашивают ask
(НУ) dj
угас(ну)ть - угасают go out
привь1к(ну)ть - привыкают get used to
ЕЙ vaj
успеют - успевают have time
заболеют - заболевают fall ill
NONSYLLABIC STEMS: dj
n/sA
вь1брать - выбирают choose
назвать(ы)- называют name
НУ
1 Most prefixed perfective НУ verbs are built on simplex perfective (mostly semelfactive)
НУ verbs, like prefixed perfective И verbs built on simplex perfectives (сбросить built оп бро
сить). Many corresponding imperfectives of these НУ verbs, like those of many И verbs, are
built оп correlated simplex imperfectives (like сбрасывают оп бросают, accounting for ab-
sence of mutation, cf. р. 136):
отдёрfнуть - отдёрrивают pull back (дёрrают 'pull ')
вьшАfdjiнуть - выплёвывают spit out (плёвать 'spit ')
прикоснуться - прикасаются touch (касаются 'touch ')
(note а instead of о)
See НУverbs in the Inventory for more examples.
In а few cases the presence of а simplex is necessary to explain а seeming deviation in the
derivational pattern (unexpected softening):
вь1швырн<g1гь - вышвиривают fling out (швыряют "fling")
NonsyllaЬic НУ stems, of course, build imperfectives in dj rather than 'ivaj (see under
NONSYLLABIC sтЕмs). But а few syllaЬic НУ stems are also (exceptionally) in dj:
сдвиfнуть - сдвигают shift
- улыбнуться - улыбаются smile
140 SECTION II : VERBS
IMPERFECТIVE DERIVAТION
vaj aj 'ii·aj
1 1 1
Sy~labic ЕIЙ 1
Obstruents (НУ)
1 1
NonsyllaЬic
11
И
1
All others ex-
resonants 1 1 cept Е, which
i inserted Consonant
has all three
in root mutation
1
root CoC-ivaj >
root CaC-ivaj
'ivaj aj
уговорить упростить
оценить удалить
устроить оформить
окрасить исправить
накопить заключить
утратить возбудить ChS
обслужить прекратить ChS
Stem recoi·ery. Recovery of the underlying stem from а derived imperfective is
not always automatic, but knowledge of the rules of formation enaЫes the
student, after some experience, to obtain the correct stem or to make an excel-
Ient guess at it. From the following imperfective verbs try to estimate the
underlying perfective (you may use the lnventory to check stems of unproduc-
tive types, after you have attempted to recover them):
SUPPLEТION AND OTHER IRREGULARIТIES IN ASPECTUAL PAIRS 141
Other cases where the prefixed imperfective stem appears to differ irregular-
Iy from the prefixed perfective stem may Ье explained Ьу the fact that the pre-
fixed imperfective was bui\t on the corresponding simplex imperfective; for
OTHER VERBAL SUFFIXES 143
examples of this in derivation from prefixed perfective И verbs see page 136; for
examples from prefixed perfective НУ verbs see page 139.
3. -н-ич-ай
The suffix ей when added to stems in the agent suffix н11к produces а type
in н11чай-ут (*ник-ей > н11чай; cf. *дерг-е > держа, footnote 1, page 48) with
the meaning "Ье а, perform an activity" associated with the word in ник:
плотнич-ай-ут · Ье а carpenter, do плотник carpenter
carpentry
сплетнич-ай-ут gossip, Ье а gossip сплетник gossip
вз.я:точнич-ай-ут take bribes взяточник bribetaker
разбойнич-ай-ут rob, plunder разбойник robber, brigand
Two enlarged suffixes have developed from the н11ч-ай type: (н)-11чай built
on adjectives in /н with the meaning "Ье" the adjective; the connotation 1s
usually pejorative (often the sense is "play at being something"):
(н)-ичай
EXERCISES
Verbal prefixes and suffixes and review of imperfective derivation. 1. Examine
the structure of the boldface verbs and, using the context of the sentences
(translating them orally), try to guess at the meanings of the verbs. Show how
you arrive at what you think the meaning is Ьу estimating the basic form and
the meaning of the root (including its Latin meaning, if it has one) and ex-
plaining prefixes (mention Latin and/or English counterparts, if appropriate)
and suffixes, if meaningful, and mentioning any other relevant points of con-
struction.
2. Give the corresponding imperfective, unless the symbol t appears after the
verb.
EXAMPLES
А large number of Russian nouns are nonderived, that is, consist only of root
or base plus ending; for example:
дбм house мбре sea
книга book окнб window
А great many other Russian nouns are derived Ьу prefixation, suffixation,
or comЬination.
PREFIXA TION
149
150 SECTION 111 : NOUNS
анти- anti-:
антивирус antivirus антифашист anti-Fascist
не- поп-, ип- (opposite):
незнание ignorance несчастье unhappiness
под- sub-:
подгруппа subgroup подпочва subsoil
со- со-:
For purposes of the modern language, па- and су- are по longer separaЫe as
prefix-noun.
The suffix -и-ё (-ь/-ё) is the most frequent suffix in the formation of these
nouns. Among the preposition-prefixes без- is especially productive. Examples:
без смерти without death бессмертие immortality
без силы without strength бессилие feeЫeness,
impotence
без работы without work безработица unemployment
без дела without something безделье inactivity
to do
за рекой beyond the river заречье land оп the other
side of the river
на персти оп the finger напёрст/о/к thimЫe
(персть 'finger'
poet)
на лицо, налицо present, on hand наличие presence
по береrу along the shore побережье coast
под полем under the field подполье underground
против яда against poison противоядие 1 antidote
EXERCISE Give the meanings of the following nouns and recover the prepositional
phrases from which they are derived:
бессмь1слие безумие безобразие бессонница
застенок Забайкалье полесье междурядье
предгорье 2 подлесок приморье согласие
SUFFIXA TION
А great many more Russian nouns, however, are derived Ьу suffixation. А
great many different suffixes participate in making nouns, and we may organize
these suffixes into the following general semantic classes: (а) abstract nouns,
{Ь) nouns denoting persons, (с) nouns denoting animals, {d) nouns denoting ob-
jects, (е) nouns denoting places, and (f) nouns with collective meaning.
1 Против acquires а connecting vowel о when comblned with another element.
2 When (Russian) перед becomes а prefix, it automatically becomes (Church Slavonic)
пред-.
152 SECTION III: NOUNS
These six categories must Ье distinguished from nouns built with suffixes
which modify or add а shade to the meaning already present but do not create а
new meaning, e.g. augmentatives, diminutives, pejoratives, etc. We will consider
these nouns separately under (g) nouns built with suffixes not creating new inde-
pendent words.
А ABSTRACT NOUNS
Abstract nouns are generally distinguishaЫe from nouns designating con-
crete objects, although there may Ье cases where classification would Ье difficult.
Rather than worrying about such cases, however, it is more useful to recognize
that, just as а concrete noun сап acquire an abstract meaning-e.g. дом' house,'
but also 'home' (with approximately the same connotation as the English
word), 'household,' and 'dynasty' (e.g. Дом Романовых 'House of Romanovs ')
-abstract nouns сап acquire quite specific or concrete meanings. Since we will
Ье referring to this process of concretization fairly often in this section, we will
give it а name: hypostasis (verb: hypostasize). For example:
ABSTRACT HYPOSTASIZED
вход going in, entrance (action) entrance (place)
покуп/ка buying, purchasing (action) purchase (thing)
редкость rarity (quality) rarity, curiosity (thing)
крепость strength (quality) stronghold, fortress
In the case of deverbative abstract nouns hypostasis most frequently entails а
generalization of the action to the result of the action, which тау or тау not Ье
а concrete physical object, often depending on the meaning of the verb:
Many suffixes build abstract nouns, but only а few are really productive.
These are -11-ё (-ь/-ё) for deverbatives, -/к-а for deverbatives, -ств-о for de-
nominatives, -ость for deadjectivals, to some extent -щ1ша and the foreign
suffixes -юм and -ац11-я. Other suffixes are either unproductive or only slightly
productive. However, as we saw in the case ofverbs, an unproductive suffix тау
build а fairly large number of important nouns.
The most important abstract nouns are the dei·erbatii·es: nouns of action
and/or (Ьу hypostasis) resu/t or product of action. Of these the most important
are nouпs in -11-ё (-ь/-ё), -#-# (zero-suffix buildiпg masculine nouпs), and -/к-а.
Tl1e less importaпt types апd, to а certaiп exteпt, nouns in -#-# апd -/к-а tend
ABSTRACT NOUNS 153
toward hypostasis; i.e. may have as one or as their only meaning а result or pro-
duct of the action, rather than the action itself.
'stitch' (pricking pain in side or chest), and the НУ stems mentioned in the footnote above.
Note also the ecclesiastical term успение' Assumption,' а loan translation based on усfшуть 'go
to-sleep.'
154 SECTION Ш: NOUNS
Stress
The stress generally falls оп the vowel i11 the syllaЫe directly preceding
-11-ё, except for derivatives from stem-stressed verbs with infinitives i11
-at', where
stem stress does not coincide with this vowel авуwау, as i11 де:1ают - де:1ан11е.
Examples:
представить (re)present представление (re)presentation
займут occupy занятие occupation
откроют open открьпие opening
ввёдут introduce введение introduction
but
прь1rают jump прь1rание jumping
требовать demand тр~бование demand
ABSTRACT NOUNS 155
Types in -ь/-ё
Uпp,-efixed 1·esonant and most n/sA stems build verbal nouns in а special
end-stressed type: -ь/-ё. Such nouns may have а some\vhat colloquial flavor.
Examples:
живут Iive жить/ё life
пьют driпk питьё drinking
мбют wash мытьё washing
врать lie враньё lying (telling of lies)
ткать weave тканьё Y,eaving
Sometimes certaiп verbal nouns are spelled -ье iпstead of -ие, sigпifyiпg а
shortened proпuпciatioп characteristic of colloquial speech. For example, the
verbal nouns in the sayings Повторенье-мать ученья· Repetition is the mother
of learning' and Сиденье:\1 города не берj·т 'You can't take а city Ьу sitting'
would Ье in -ие in normal literary usage. In an earlier period the two spellings
alternated without any real significance, except for poets, for whom the differ-
ence could Ье important metrically: знание (three syllaЫes) vs. знанье (two
syllaЫes). Lexical douЫets, for example, воскресение 'resurrection' vs. вос
кресенье 'Sunday,' are rare. The proпunciation distinctioп between -нье and
-ние is in any case slight. and in rapid speech -111,е usually emerges as mono-
syllaЬic [-n'::i].
Umitations оп formation
For а\1 their abundance, verbal nouns iп -и-ё (-ь,1-ё), as noted above, are
very rarely formed from at least two verbal types (О stems, НУ stems) and are
not formed from а great number of other verbs as well. For practical purposes
it is best to state that one cannot assume formation of such а noun from а given
stem, but that one should have а high degree of expectancy for their formation; 1
that is, know how to recognize them and make them, at least theoretically. Pre-
fixed perfective И stems and obstruents are quite likely to form nouns in -11-ё; so
are derived imperfectives in ii·aj and i-aj, but not, however, derived imperfectives
in aj. Certain other generalizations may suggest themselves as one encounters
more and more examples.
1 Ordinary dictionaries often do not list all the nouns which may actually Ье in use. E.g.
чнтаm1е and говорен11е are recorded only in the very largest dictionaries, though one finds
examples like К че~•У бь,.'lо всё это ч1паm1е, писание, говорен11е 'What was the use of all this
reading, writing, and talking?' (Note that the English word "reading" is usually not ч1паm1е
but чтение.) Verbal nouns, like derived imperfectives, are readily created Ьу Russian speakers,
w!iether or not the dictionary happens to list them.
156 SECTION 111: NOUNS
А small number of (НУ) stems and prefixed НУ stems add -новение rather
than -е1111еto the truncated stem:
исчез(ну)ть disappear исчезновение disappearance
возник(ну)ть emerge возникновение emergence
столкнуться col\ide столкновение collision
прикоснуться touch прикосновение touch
Note the exceptional пение 'singing'; despite (c)noii-yт, past passive parti-
ciple спет, and восстание 'revolt, uprisiпg' < восстанут 'revolt, rise up.'
The meaning of the verbal noun in -11-ё is usually the name of the actioп,
process, or state denoted Ьу the verbal stem (here an English word in -ing often
corresponds) and/or the result or product of the action (in which case another
English word is often used). Thus реше1111е means both the "process of decid-
i ng" and the "result of deciding"; that is, "decision." Note:
tinct, and often not predictaЫe, from the meaning of the verb. Note the follow-
ing examples:
писание act/process ofwriting
написание spelling, manner in which something has been written
EXERCJSES Form verbal nouns in -и-ё (-ь/-ё) from the following stems. Mark stress
and try to give the meaning, without using the dictionary.
спасут save слушают Iisten
пёкут bake надевают put оп
лёжать lie посетить ChS visit
значить mean увеличить increase
с/о/жмут press снимут take off
очистить clean рассмотреть examine
роют dig уставай- get tired
укроют cover пользоваться use
ший-ут sew высказывают express
приобрётут acquire стеснить restrain
приспособить adapt вторr(ну)ться invade
переживают experience просветить ChS enlighten
ликвидировать Iiquidate родить(ся) ChS give Ьirth (Ье born)
входить ChS enter
Try to estimate the underlying basic form for the following. Disregard stress.
позволение удивление имение предпочтение
поднятие пролитие обсуждение опровержение
замечание плавание регулирование расходование
158 SECTION 111: NOUNS
General
Other nouns of action/result are made Ьу adding various nominal suffixes
to а prefixed or unprefixed verbal root. The most important suffixes are -#-#
(zero-suffix building masculine nouns) and -/к-а. The existence of these nouns is
less "predictaЬ!e" than in the case of the verbal nouns treated above, but they
represent the verb in the same sense. For example:
Sometimes one (and rarely more) ofthese other types ofnoun coexists with
а verbal noun in -и-ё; in such cases the meanings are usually distinct. The verbal
noun in -и-ё тау designate the action, while the other deverbatives, in conform-
ity with а tendency toward hypostasis, тау have а more concrete meaning,
designating а result or product of the action. Or each noun тау represent а
different meaning of the verb. Here are some examples:
Examples in which the meanings differ less sharply (the nouns are not
altogether synonymous but may Ье more or less interchangeaЫe in certain
cases):
возвратить - возвращают ChS: return
возвращение return } (almost no difference in mean-
возврат return ing)
растворить - растворяют: dissolve
растворение (dis)solution (action emphasized)
раствор solution (product emphasized)
::-;оп: Verbs in ОВА add -. 1.-а to the root plus ов from the ,·erbal suffix:
.:mктовать dictate ,:mктбв 'ка dictation
(за)бастовать (go on) strike забаст6в .t...i strike
ко:1.1ан;:шрова ть send on а business trip ко:1.1ан.:шр6в ка business tri р
This type is Yery producti,·e. particularly for Yerbs in -ировать. In addition, а
number of ,·erbs in -ставввитъ haYe correlated nouns in -станбв1.а:
остановить - останав.;швают stop останов 'ка stop
установить - устанав:швают place; establish vстан6в ка placing
NOTE: А very few feminine zero-suffixed nouns show mutation in the final root
consonant. Among nouns in -#-а, the (-)дача - -дажа nouns mentioned on page
161 have mutated from root variants ДАТ - ДАД; for example:
Neuters in -11-ё:
-ац11-я: This suffix offoreign origin is somewhat productive for nouns ofaction/
result from verbs in (11з)11ровать; for example:
конкретизировать make concrete конкретизация makiпg concrete,
"concretization"
советизировать sovietize советизация sovietization
военизировать militarize военизация militarization
The remaining types are totally unproductive and have very few examples
each:
-/о/к:
(по)звонить ring звон/6/к ring bell
поступить - поступают act (take а step) поступ/о/к act
прь1rнуть jump (perf semel)} /, /
. С прыжок jump
прь1rают Jump 1mpf)
1 Учительство also has the collective meaning 'body of teachers' (cf. р. 194), but here we
have the collective -ств-added to the noun учитель.
166 SECTTON 111 : NOUNS
-ёж:
EXERCISE Look up and comment on and/or compare the following v.·ords and
groups of words:
вздор расстройство развод - разводка
совет обстановка отступ - отступлениё
стук оркестровка роспись - расписка - расписание
оборот сволочь пример - примерка
обоз боязнь объём - объятие - обнимка
нажим дар - подарок произношение - произнесение
помощь плата - платёж согласие - соглашение
опора клад-кладь просьба - прошение
народ шов-шитьё описание - опись
ABSTRACT NOUNS 167
DENOMINATIVES
Note also some nouns formed Ьу adding -ств-о to compound agent пouns coп
sistiпg of а пominal root, а connecting vowel, а verbal root, апd а zero-suffi.x
(cf. pages 204-205):
коновод horse breeder коноводство horse breeding
людоед cannibal людоедство cannibalism
DEADJECТIV ALS
-1111-а: This suffix is joined to relationaJl adjectives in -ск- (ск > щ before 11) to
form nouns designating а system, а collectivity of customs and haЬits, а culture,
or, sometimes, the people involved, often with а negative connotation:
-изн-а:
Enlarged -ов11з11-а:
-от-а:
1 "Relational" and "qualitative" adjectives will Ье discussed in Section IV, рр. 209-211.
2 А character in Russian literature whose name became а symbol for inertia and good-
nat-ured sloth.
170 SECTION 111: NOUNS
-ин-а:
-и-ё (-ь/-ё):
-ын-я:
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the following пouns are derived and ideп
tify the suffixes and their meanings. Discuss апу special proЫems pertaiпing to
the derivation.
соседство свежесть аристократизм
дурачество щекотливость расизм
равенство разборчивость славянизм
овцеводство поверхностность белогвардейщина
издательство узость маниловщина
миссионерство проходимость прямизна
мастерство пассивность прямота
свинство живность простота
франтовство откровенность старина
грубость
NOUNS DENOТING PERSONS \ 71
Such nouns are treated оп pages 187-188. Note also enlarged suffix -11тель:
-/е/ц:
This suffix builds nouns from nominal, adjectival, and verbal stems. For
example:
DENOMINAТIVES
DEADJECТIV ALS
DEVERBATIVES
-ов/е/ц:
man.' The alternation of stressed е with unstressed н before jot is not uncommon in Russian
(cf. р. 72). The difference is purely orthographical; *гвардея would have the same pronuncia-
tion as rвар,111я, but Russian spelling rules exclude -ея after stress.
2 In certain nouns in which the zero alternate produces а difficult or impossiЫe consonant
cluster, thc "nюbile" е is retained throughout the paradigm; i.e. жнец, жнеца; храбрец,
храбреца.
NOUNS DENOТING PERSONS 173
-е/е/ц:
-ин/е/ц:
Suffixes in -11к
-ик: -ик Ьу itself is а productive element in the formation of nouns from adjec-
tives in -/н- and -ов-:
родственный related родственник relative (noun)
глазной еуе(adj) глазник еуе specialist
фронтовой frontline (adj) фронтовик 1 frontline soldier
передовой foremost передовик 1 foremost (leading)
горловой throat (adj) горловик throa t specialist
Elsewhere -ик is mostly unproductive and builds only а few isolated words; for
example:
старый old старик old man
поручить entrust with а task поручик lieutenant (obs)
А less productive type designates persons with respect to some action; such
nouns are correlated with verbs or deverbative nouns. For example:
работают работа work работник worker
защитить защита defend, defense защитник defender
изменить измена betray, treachery изменник traitor
-щик (variant -чик after stems ending in т, 1 д, с, з). This suffix builds nouns
from nouns and verbs and is extremely productive for both types:
DENOМINATIVES
whether а noun in -щик is derived from this noun or from the verb; e.g. вкщiдчик from вктiд
or вкшiдывают, рассказчик from рассказ or рассказать.
3 Cf. the same \•;ord designating an object ('meter') rather than а person (р. 191).
NOUNS DENOТING PERSONS 175
bers of ethnic or sociological groups. The plural stem lacks the ин, 1 and the
nominative and genitive endings are special (nominative plural -е, genitive plural
-#). Consonants preceding the suffix are frequently, but not a\ways, palatalized,
and consonant mutation occurs sporadically:
север north северянин northerner
юr south южанин southerner
Лютер Luther лютерянин Lutheran
Mohican могиканин Mohican
Киев Kiev киевлянин Kievan
город city горожанин city dweller
Cf. ChS град city гражданин citizen
СЛАВ Slav славянин Slav
Егиn/е/т Egypt египтянин Egyptian
Армения Armenia армянин Aгmenian
двор court дворянин noЫeman
priately, disappears in the plural); see -1111, р. 179, -ин-а and -ин/к-а, рр. 189-190.
2 -ск and certain other suffixes building place-names are omitted before -чаm,н and certain
-атор correlated with French -ateur and (less often) English -ator in words like
реформатор Fr 'reformateur'
организатор Fr •organisateur'
администратор Fr 'administrateur' Eng 'administrator'
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the following nouns are derived and iden-
tify the suffixes and their meanings. Discuss any special proЫems pertaining
to derivation.
житель младенец угольщик германист
водитель вузовец вь1борщик уклонист
воспитатель армеец натурщик фрейдист
завоеватель батареец оценщик правдист
получатель массовик лётчик адресант
создатель тыловик раздатчик докторант
держатель народник переводчик коммерсант
искатель пожарник зимовщик магометанин
хитрец западник расшифровщик лютеранин
делец ЛЬ\ЖНИК газовщик тарусянин
боец взяточник подавальщик кировчанин
македонец дачник чистильщик бракёр
178 SECTION III: NOUNS
-ак: Nominal, adjectival, and verbal stems. А final stem paired consonant
frequently appears soft:
море sea моряк sailor
Сибирь Siberia сибиряк SiЬerian
ТОЛСТЫЙ fat толстяк fat man
добрый good, kind добряк good, kind fellow
простой simp]e простак simp]eton
резать cut резак slaughterhouse worker
ВОДИТЬ \ead вожак \eader
(note mutation)
-ун: Makes primarily nouns of agent from verbal stems. The nouns often have
an "expressive" meaning:
-ыш: Adjectival and verbal stems. Many have "expressive" meaning and а col-
loquial flavor:
Unproductive types
-ан: Nominal and adjectival stems and verbal stems (variants -яьн and -11ян).
The nouns often have "expressive" meaning and а colloquial or popular flavor:
брюхо ЬеПу брюхан person with а large belly
великий big, great великан giant
смутить trouЫe, confuse смутьян trouЫe maker
грубить Ье rude грубиян rude fellow, boor
-ин: This suffix has "singulative" meaning and builds primarily nouns designat-
ing а single member of а geographical, ethnic, or sociologica\ group. The suffix
is usually, but not always, lost in the plural (cf. the productive sнffix -ан11н with
а singular meaning, pages 175-176).
NOTE: the о in this suffix is not moЬile; the genitive singular is -ока. Do not con-
fщ;e -ок with -/о/к as in плат/6/к, genitive singular плат/ка.
) 80 SECTION III: NOUNS
The enlarged suffix -ович (-евич) builds patronymics of а very few nouns:
поп priest попович son of а priest
король king королевич prince (son of а king)
This suffix is productive and much more important for building patronymics
from first names. For example:
Иван Ivan Иванович son of Ivan
Самсон Samson Самсонович son of Samson
-ён/о/к: This suffix builds а few nouns designating young human beings, though
it is commoner with nouns denoting animals. For example:
EXERCJSE Recover the words from which the following nouns are derived and
identify the suffixes and their meanings. Discuss any special proЬ!ems
pertaining to derivation.
слухач левак горлан магометанин
рифмач крикун лекарь едок
холостяк ГОЛЬIШ вратарь дьяволёнок
1 Not all masculine nouns denoting persons have feminine counterparts. The probability
for the existence of а feminine counterpart is lower in some types than in others, or existence
of а feminine may Ье precluded Ьу semantic considerations:
юбочник skirt chaser no corresponding *юбочница
бородач bearded man no corresponding *бородач/ка
1 The suffix -/к/ builds at least one noun designating the wife of а шаlе in а profession:
со.цат 'soldier,' со.1датка 'soldier's \\·ife.' But сошраrе м11.1шюнер 'шillionaire,' м11.1.111онер/
ка 'шillionairess' with м11.1:111онерша 'шillionaire·s• \\·ife' (or, colloquially, 'шillionairess');
i.e. :ша, not -/к-а, ordinarily builds the noun designating the wife.
184 SECTION III: NOUNS
EXERCISE Discuss the formation ofthe following feminine nouns denoting persons
and give the corresponding masculine noun, if one exists.
еврейка землячка автоматчица парикмахерша
шведка католичка разведчица кассирша
испанка бесстьщн иuа оценщица врунья
террористка наследница болельщица боярыня
машинистка приятельница султанша ткачиха
аспирантка посетительница премьерша певица
девка
NOUNS DENOT~G ANIMALS 185
The suffix -ён/о/к (nominative plural -ят-а, genitive -ят, etc.), designates
young animals. Final paired consonants are soft before this suffix. Formation
is from the masculine stem, if а pair exists, but many stems do not build these
types. Examples:
гусь goose гусён/о/к gosling
коз/ё/л goat козлён/о/к kid
волк wolf волчон/о/к wolf cub
медведь (m) bear медвежон/о/к 1 bear cub
медвежата
Much less common is the suffix -ёныш. lt designates the young, often with
an affectionate connotation, and has а colloquial flavor:
ут/ка duck утёныш 2 little duck
гусь (m) goose гусёныш little goose
The general word is детёныш 'young (of any) animal.'
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the following nouns are derived and give
the suffixes. Discuss any special proЫems pertaining to derivation.
тигрица ежиха зайчонок змеёныш
соловьиха котёнок бобрёнок
1 д also mutates in this example and верблюд 'camel,' верблюжон/о/к, but cf. .JJебедь
'swan,' .1ебедё11/о/к.
2 Suffix is added to an abbreviated stem ут-.
NOUNS DENOТir-.-G OBJECTS 187
-те.1ь (m):
указать indicate указатель indicator, index
проигрывают (-ать) play through проигрыватель record player
двигают (двигать) move двигатель motor, engine
растворить disso!Ye растворитель so!Yent
(,)
вьшрячить rectify выпря:-.1итель rectifier
(electricity) (electricity)
глушить silence. muffie глушитель silencer, muffier
-.1ьн11к:
-.1/к-а:
This suffix builds а large number of nouns designating а carrier or container 1 for
the thing named in the stem:
игла (gen pl игл, needle but игольник needle holder
not иг/о/л2)
вопрос question вопросник questionnaire
задача proЫem задачник proЬ!em book
слово word словник glossary
слив/ки cream сливочник cream pot
киш/ка intestine кишечник intestines
сбор collection сборник collection (of songs, poems,
etc. in а book)
1 The suffix -ник in this n,eaning includes а nun,ber of nouns which may Ье regarded as
3 Tl1cre аге а fairly large nun,bcr of plural only (pluralia tantum) nouns which designate
leavings ог rcfusc of some k ind. Gender is usually masculine (gen pl -ков) but may Ье feminine
(gen pl -/о 'к):
объсдю1, объедков leavings (fron, eating)
оч11стки, очtiстков peelings (vegetaЬle, etc.)
оп11в/ки, опt"tвок leavings (fron, drinking)
NOUNS DENOТING OВJECTS 189
3. Concretization of meaning:
верх top вершина summit
кон/е/ц end кончина decease, demise
СЕРЕД-СРЕД root 'middle' середина middle
дол dale (poet) долина valley
With verb stems the noun тау Ье the result of the process, sometimes а mark or
аspot:
развалиться collapse развалина ruin (of а person), (pl) ruins
царапают scratch царапина scratch
отметить note, mark отметина mark (on animal, etc.)
А few nouns denoting trees or bushes and/or their fruits:
МАЛ root 'small' малина raspberry bush, raspbe,ries
масло oil маслина olive tree, olive
-л-о: Added to infinitive stem or, with а very few consonant stems, to the basic
stem. Normally denotes instrument performing the action described Ьу the verb:
моют (мьпь) wash мьшо soap
дуют (-уть) Ыоw дуло muzzle
NOUNS DENOТING OBJECTS l9l
поддувают (-ать) Ыоw from поддувало ashpit
underneath
покрывают (-ать) cover покрывало shawl, bedspread
точить sharpen точило whetstone
н~чнут (начать) begin начало beginning
пёкут bake пекло scorching heat, hell
СЕД - СЯД - СИД sit седло saddle
(root)
-щик (variant -чик after stems ending in т, д, с, з):
-арь (m):
слово word словарь dictionary
буква letter букварь АВС book
-/е/нь (m):
лий-у pour лив/е/нь cloudburst
ров/ный РОВ even уров/е/нь level
грёбут row, rake греб/е/нь comb
192 SECTION III : NOUNS
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the following nouns are derived and give
the suffixes. Discuss any special proЫems pertaining to derivation.
делитель бумажник безрукавка rрь1зло
показатель багажник пятирублёвка тяrло
переключатель песенник восковка дневник
светильник справочник веснушка капельница
доильник свёрток снежинка сухарь
сушилка цветок телятина трояк
сажалка обрезок лучина перст/е/нь
цедилка пилотка ныряло месиво
разрядник жестянка мерило отыгрыш
NOUNS DENOТING PLACES 193
1 Productive suffixes
-ль/и-я: Added to infinitive stem:
раздеваются (-аться) take off coat раздеваль/ня cloakroom
читают (-ать) read читаль/ня reading room
сушить dry сушиль/ня drying room
купают(ся) (ать(ся)) bathe (self) купаль/ня bathhouse
А more colloquial suffix building the same type of noun is -л/к-а. Added to
infinitive stem:
раздеваются (аться) take off coat раздевал/ка cloakroom (colloq)
читают (-ать) read читал/ка reading room (colloq)
сушить dry сушил/ка drying room (colloq)
-бищ-ё:
-овь/-ё:
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the following nouns are derived and give
the suffixes. Discuss any special proЫems pertaining to derivation.
красильня караулка глинище колокольня
спальня цыплятник чистилище
-ь-ё: The meaning is usually pejorative, and the words are usually colloquial:
баба woman (pej) бабьё women (pej, рор)
зверь (wild) beast, brute зверьё (wild) beasts, brutes (also fig,
(also fig) colloq)
офицер officer офицерьё officers (pej, рор)
сырой raw сырьё raw material(s)
старый old старьё old things, junk (colloq); old
people (pej, рор)
Other suffixes are:
-няк: дуб oak tree дубняк oak grove
-ник: берёза Ьirch tree березник (or березняк) Ьirchwood
-тв-а: лист leaf листва foliage
-ур-а: This suffix, added to foreign stems, mostly in -ант or -ент is similar to
-ств-о in making nouns that designate а profession or activity and also the col-
lective body engaged in the profession or activity:
аспирант graduate student аспирантура graduate students (co\lec);
graduate course
агент agent агентура agents (collec); secret service
адвокат lawyer адвокатура the bar (collec); Iegal
profession
The suffix -ур-а is distinct from the element -ур-а in boпowings from Western
European words in -ura/-ure; for example, литература 'literature,' архитектура
'architecture,' etc. from which the suffix is derived.
Finally, there are а few words in -/н-я denoting small groups of more than
one:
ЧЕТВЕР four (collec) четверня quadruplets
ДВОЙ two (collec) двойня twins
двор court дворня domestics, servants; petty bureaucrats
(obs)
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the fo\lowing nouns are derived and give
the suffixes. Discuss any special proЫems pertaining to derivation.
рьщарство дурачьё клиентура
тряпьё липняк аппаратура
196 SECTION III: NOUNS
1 Diminutive suffixes
Diminutive suffixes comprise а much larger and more diversified group than
augmentatives. The chief suffixes are: (а) suffixes iпcluding the consonant к, pro-
ductive for masculine and feminine nouns but uпproductive for neuter; and (Ь)
suffixes including the consonant ц, productive for neuter nouns but less usual and
less productive for masculine and feminine nouns.
Suffixes including к
:l,IASCULISE
Suffixes including 11
SEUТER
-/ц-о: Variants -ец-б (ending stressed) and -1щ-е (ending unstressed) if the
noun ends in а consonant cluster:
ВИНО wine винцо v.'ine (dim)
пись/мо letter пись~1еuо letter (dim)
платье dress платьице dress (dim)
дело business дель/це business (dim)
слово \vord слов/цо \vord (dim)
мнение opinion мненьице opinion (dim)
(мненье)
MASCULI:-.'E
FEMININE
The types above represent the first gradation of diminution and may Ье
called diminutives of the first degree. The suffixes may express diminution, but
often the emphasis is on the emotional connotation of affection or humor. ln
diminutives of the second degree the emotional connotation almost entirely
supplants the diminutive meaning, which is subordinate or totally absent.
Diminutives of the second degree are formed Ьу adding а second diminutive
suffix (-/к-) to а diminutive ofthe first degree. In the frequent cases that the pre-
ceding suffix also contains а vowel-zero alternation so that the vowel-zero-con-
taining elements are juxtaposed, it acquires а vowel before it (cf. page 68) in the
resulting compound suffix, as may Ье noted in the first two examples below:
-/к- plus -/о/к > -оч/ё/к: друж/о/к дружбч/ё/к friend (dim affec)
-/к- plus -/к-а > -оч/к-а: книж/ка книжёч/ка book (dim affec)
-иц- plus -/к-а > -ич/к-а: водица водичка water (dim affec)
-иш/к- (used \\'ith nouns of all genders): Ending is -а for all feminines and for
masculines designating persons or animals and -о for neuters and masculines
designating objects. Syntactic gender is that of base noun (cf. page 196):
квартира apartment квартириш/ка apartment (dim pej)
петух rooster петушиш/ка rooster (dim pej)
город city городиш/ко city (dim pej)
куп/е/ц merchant купчиш/ка merchant (dim pej)
зем/ля land зеыmiш/ка land (dim pej)
молоко milk молочишко milk (dim pej)
здоровье health здоровьишко health (dim pej)
-ён~'к-а:
2 Augmentative suffixes
There is only one important augmentative suffix:
-11щ-ё - -11щ-а:The ending is -а for feminine and -ё for masculine and neuter
nouns. This suffix is sometimes pejorative. Examples:
нос nose носище nose (aug)
друг friend дружище friend (aug)
борода beard бородища beard (aug)
дом house домище house (aug)
вино wine винище wine (aug)
рука hand ручища hand (aug)
COMBINA TION
Though less important than suffixation, combination plays an important
role in nominal word-formation, and compound words (the resu1t of comЬination)
comprise а number of numerous and productive types.
There are two relationships possiЫe between the two stems which make up
а compound word: coordination and subordination. Coordination involves the
simple addition of independent elements, which are ordinarily joined Ьу а
hyphen. This type of compound forms а small but productive group:
А COORDINAТION
диван-кровать couch bed
язьrк-основа language base
пила-рьrба sawfish
мать-героиня hero-mother
самолёт-снаряд flying bomb
В SUBORDINAТION
Much more often some kind of subordination is involved. А hyphen is
ordinarily not used. Elements may Ье joined directly or linked Ьу а connecting
vowel, normally -о- (-е-). The latter type of formation is much more important
than the former.
These nouns comprise only а few isolated types: cities in -град, полу- 'half,'
and аtype with various foreign words as the first element:
Ленинrрад Leningrad
Волгоrрад Volgograd
полубог demigod
полусон half-asleep
кинотеатр movie theater
псевдонаука pseudoscience
1 The connecting vowel о is, of course, spelled е after soft paired consonants and hushings.
If а final paired consonant of the first word is soft when the word stands alone, it is normally
soft in the compound as well, though there are exceptions:
крбвь Ыооd пролитие spilling кровопролитие Ыoodshed
But cf. кровебоязнь 'fear of Ыооd.'
COMВINATION 203
свой own образ form своеобразие originality
разный various образ form разнообразие diversity
чёрное Ыасk море sea черномор/е/ц sailor of the Вlack Sea
fleet
ред/кий sparse лес forest редколесье sparse growth of trees
The numerals 100 and 1,000 are joined to noun stems Ьу the connecting
vowel о, but most other numerals occur in the genitive form in these compounds.
For the numeral 2 the genitive двух- is often reduced to дву-. For 2 to 4 the col-
lectives двой-, трой-, четвер- with the connecting vowel о тау Ье used instead
of the genitives:
сто лет years
100 столетие 100 years (anniversary)
ть1сяча лет 1,000 years тысячелетие 1,000 years (anniversary)
шестьдесят лет 60 years шестидесятилетие 60 years (anniversary)
сорок лет 40 years сорокалетие 40 years (anniversary)
десять лет 10 years десятилетие 10 years (anniversary)
два, три, 2, 3, 4 years двух (трёх-, четы- 2, 3, 4 years (anniversary)
четь1ре рёх-) -летие
4. Noun or pronoun or adjectil:e stem connected to 1.:erb root plus suffix. The
suffix -11-ё (-ь-ё) is common with abstract nouns:
зем/ля land ДЕЛ do, make земледелие agriculture
труд work ЛЮБ love трудолюбие industry, diligence
себя self ЛЮБ love себялюбие self-love
лёг/кий easy ВЕР believe лекговерие credulity
nись/мо letter нос carry письмонос/е/ц letter carrier
яс/ный clear вид see ясновид/е/ц clairvoyant
закон law ДАЙ give законодатель legislator
А number of types in -и-ё (-ь/-ё) and а few types in other suffixes тау achieve а
certain autonomy and build families of words:
-мыслие: свободомь1слие легкомь1слие разномь1слие единомь1слие
-душие: бездушие слабодушие равнодушие добродушие
простодушие
-лесье: подлесье перелесье безлесье малолесье чернолесье
-нос/е/ц: броненос/е/ц рогонос/е/ц орденонос/е/ц
-вид/е/ц: очевид/е/ц сновид/е/ц
_ -датель: работодатель залогодатель
204 SECTIO::\' III: KOUNS
5. ;\fasculine 11ou11s of agent 11·it/1 а zero suffix. These nouns may designate
persons or objects. The most important type consists of а noun stem connected
to а ,·erb stem ,,·ith the noun а direct object or other component ofthe verb. IfX
is the noun and У the Yerb, the resulting component has the general format
"X-Y-er":
лю.:щ people едят-есть eat :1юдоед cannibal (people
eater)
л/ё/д ice колоть stab .1е.1окол icebreaker
ПЬ!ЛЬ dust сосать suck пылесос vacuum cleaner
рь1ба fish ловить catch рыбопов fisherman
ЯЗЬIК language ведают (obs) kno,v языковед linguist
вода ,,·ater проводить conduct водопровод ,,·ater pipe
пар steam хо,:ппь go пароход steamer
пуля bullet :-.1етать thrO\\' пуле:-.1ёт machine-gun
вода ,,·ater лазить cra,vl во.:юлаз diver
In а Yery fe,v cases the order is reYersed; the Yerb precedes the noun:
шёлкают click перо pen шепкопёр (obs) pen-pusher
лизать lick б:1юдо plate лизоблюд (рор) lickspittle
Cf. archaic блюдолиз.
Nouns denoting the field or activity associated ,vith the agent are built Ьу
adding а bstract suffixes to the nouns: 1
1 These nouns in themsel,·es, considered as activities performed Ьу the agent compound
nouns, are not compound; i.e. they ha,·e the structure с~-отовб.:1-ств-о, язы~.ове.:1-ени-е. Ho,,·-
e,er, the acti,·ities (raising, kno,,·ing) may easily become associated directly ,,·ith the noun, by-
passing the agent stage, and this semantic change produces the enlarged "suffixes" -во.:1ств-о,
-ве.1еm1-е.
COMBINAТION 205
-вод-ств-о: скотовод са ttleraiser СКОТОВОДСТВО cattle raising
-лов-ств-о: птицелов Ьirdcatcher птицеловство Ьird catching
вед-ени-ё: языковед linguist языковедение linguistics
-дел-и-ё: винодел wine maker виноделие wine making
Foreign agent ,vords in -граф, -.1ог, -скоп, -фи.1, -фоб, etc. are analogous
to the Russian type. In these ,vords the first element is subordinated to the second
(often verbal idea from the Greek) element, and the nonsuffixed agent stem
noun has а corresponding noun built with а suffix (often -11-я or -ств-о) which
denotes the field or activity associated with the agent (corresponding English
words should Ье clear):
-rраф- -rрафия: reorpaф - rеоrрафия библиограф - библиография
-лоr- -лоrия: биолог - биология диалектолог - диалектология
-фил - -филъство: англофйл - англофйлъство
славянофйл - славянофйлъство
-фоб - -фобство: англофоб - англофобство
rерманофоб - германофобство
-скоп: спектроскоп термоскоп микроскоп
The urge toward metaphor, however, сап cause еvеп а fundamentally rela-
tional adjective to Ье used figuratively. Hence:
However, when the meaning has to do with the substance of si\ver, only серебря
ный may Ье used.
А qualitative adjective, of course, is not necessarily metaphorical, but it
always deals with the quality of а noun, rather than its direct re\ationship to
something:
EXERCISE Using а dictionary, give and compare meanings of the following qualita-
tive and re\ationa\ adjectives. It may Ье useful to find or construct expressions
or sentences in which they are used.
звучный - звуковой трудный- трудовой сильный - силовой
вечный- вековой кровный - кровяной плодовитый - плодовый
водный - водяной
В NONDERIVED ADJECТIVES
There are between two and three hundred adjectives in Russian which from
the point of view of the modern \anguage are nonderived. The hard core of these
are qualitative adjectives with simple descriptive meanings:
молодой young пустой empty плохой bad белый white
2] 2 SECTION IV: ADJECТIVES
Many of these nonsuffixed types are historically derivatives; i.e. they are fused
adjectival roots. -/и- and -/к- are frequently the elements fused. For example:
добрый good, nice доб-р root ДОБ convenience
богатый rich бог-ат root БОГ god; rich
разный various раз-и verb prefix раз- dis-, distribute
блед/ный pale блед-н cf. блiдий pale (Ukrainian)
яр/кий bright яр-к cf. ярый ardent; violent
Cf. page 29 for other examples and discussion of fusion.
The majority of Russian adjectives, however, are derived Ьу suffixation,
prefixation, or comЬination, or Ьу more than one of these three processes.
PREFIXA TION
Still other prefixes which are simply added to adjectives merely intensify the
meaning and do not create new words. Included are both native and foreign
prefixes:
пре-: добрый kind, nice предобрый extremely kind/nice
раз-: весёлый merry, gay развесёлый extremely merry/gay
сверх-: бь1стрый fast сверхбь1стрый extremely fast
наи- (used with comparative adjectives):
ВЬIСШИЙ higher наивь1сший highest
архи-: нелепый absurd архинелепый utterly absurd
ультра-: правый right ультраправый ultraright
EXERC/SE Give the meanings of the following adjectives and recover the preposi-
tional phrases from which they are derived:
бессильный досрочный посильный приозёрный
закавказский межрайонный надклассовый подзащитный
бездонный наземный подворный безногий
внебрачный отымённый посмертный противолихо-
SUFFIXA TION
Suffixation plays Ьу far the most important role in the formation of adjec-
tives. While the number of adjectival suffixes is not so great as that of nominal
suffixes, the more important adjectival types build substantially more words
than the important nominal types.
We shall treat adjectival suffixes under the following five headings: (а) the
suffix -/11-; (Ь) suffixes ,vhich build relational adjectives; (с) suffixes which build
qualitative adjectives; (d) suffixes of participial origin; and (е) diminutive and aug-
mentative adjectival suffixes.
ТНЕ SUFFIX -/Н- 215
1 -ск- (-еск-)
А final stem ц may mutate, giving -ческий but sometimes does not mutate,
giving -цкий (the с of the suffix is lost in the spelling):
от/е/ц father отеческий fatherly, paternal
младен/е/ц infant младенческий infantile
нем/е/ц German немецский German (adj)
молод/е/ц valiant, brave молодецкий valiant, brave
young man
In relatively recent foreign stems, velars may Ье retained:
Нью-Йорк New York нью-иоркский New York (adj)
Страсбург Strasbourg страсбургский Strasbourg (adj)
казах Kazakh казахский Kazakh (adj)
The comЬination -к-ск- results in -цк- in а number of adjectives derived
from nouns denoting persons (particularly in the suffixes -ак and -11к); for
example:
дурак fool дурацкий foolish
казак Cossack казацский Cossack (adj)
холостяк bachelor холостяцкий bachelor's
мужик peasant (obs) мужицкий peasant (adj) (obs)
покойник dead, deceased покбйниuкий dead, lifeless, like а dead
person person
220 SECTION IV: ADJECТIVES
3. NonsyllaЬic -ск- (and also syllaЬic variant -еск-; see page 218) condi-
tions а moЬile vowel in а preceding element which contains а vowel-zero alter-
nation at the derivational level (whether or not the element contains а vowel-
zero alternation at the inflectional \evel:
судь/я (gen pl суд/е/й) judge судейский judge's; judicial
жить/ё (gen pl жит/е/й) life житейский life's, of life
Москва (no pl, but at Moscow московский Moscow (adj),
derivational level: моск/в) Muscovite
Литва (no pl, but at Lithuania литовский Lithuanian
derivational level: лит/в)
4. Place-names in -пи may add • ск- directly to the whole stem :1
Анrлия England анrлийский English
Австрия Austria австрийский Austrian
or to the stem minus -ий; for example:
Албания Albania албанский Albanian
Финляндия Finland финляндский Finnish
5. Stress on the ending is less common than stem stress in adjectives in
-ск-, and adjectives in -ской, like those in -ной, tend to Ъе relational:
море sea морской maritime, naval
rород city городской city (adj), municipal
Дон Don донской Don (adj)
-ическ-: This is the most important enlarged suffix. Based on the type логик(а)/
логичесю1й, ф11з11к(а)/ф11зичесю1й, etc., -ическ- is autonomous in words like:
герой hero rероический 2 heroic, а hero's
сцена stage сценический stage (adj)
биология Ьiology биологический biological
биолог Ьiologist
фотография photography фотографический photographic
фотограф photographer
1 Note that а nun1ber of nouns in -11я
build adjectives in -ейск11й rather than in -ийскнй;
e.g. ар:ш1я/ар:wейсю1й, 11ол1щ11я/11отщейск11й,etc. Cf. Инд11я: 11ндийск11й '(East) lndian,'
11ндсйск11й '(American) lndian.' The alternation of stressed ей with unstressed нй was dis-
cussed оп р. 72; see also р. 172, footnote 1.
2 Cf. the adjective in unenlarged -ск-: геройск11й, with essentially the same meaning:
rсрбiiск11й or героичссю1й 11бдв11r 'heroic exploit.'
SUFFIXES WНICH BUILD RELA TIONAL ADJECТIVES 221
and foreign: -11ст (extremely productive), -ант, -ент, -ор, -ер, ёр:
However, even in these examples the relation to the noun remains clear. The
essential "relationality" of -ск- may Ье illustrated Ьу comparing certain adjec-
tives in -ск- with the corresponding adjectives in -/н-. Though such adjectives
are sometimes very close or identical in meaning, often the type in -ск- has а
relational or relational-qualitative meaning, while the corresponding type in
-/11- normally has а qualitative meaning and does not normally have relational
meaning. For example:
изобретатель inventor изобретательский inventor's; inventive
изобретатель/ный inventive, resourceful
воспитатель educator воспитательский educator's
воспитательный educational, educative
проситель petitioner просительский petitioner's
просительный pleading (adj) (glance, etc.)
поэтика poetics поэтический poetic (pertaining to poetry)
or poetic (fig)
поэтич/ный poetic (fig)
EXERCISES Using а dictionary, give the meaning of and compare, where appropri-
ate, the following adjectives:
теоретический- теоретичный симпатический - симпатичный
этический - этичный дипломатический - дипломатичный
Estimate the nouns from which the following adjectives in -ск- are derived:
норвежский повстанческий калмьщкий
библейский исландский австралийский
орфографический банковский пророческий
педагогический писарской пастушеский
нигилистский посольский баскский
словацкий олимпийский
2 -ов-
-ов- is the other major and productive relational suffix. Unlike -ск-, it does
not build adjectives from nouns denoting persons but is very common with
nouns \Vith а concrete or physical meaning:
бензин gasoline бензиновый gasoline (adj)
666 bean бобовый bean (adj)
мёд honey медовый honey (adj)
SUFFIXES WНICH BUILD RELA TIONAL ADJECТIYES 223
двор/е/ц palace дворцовый palace (adj)
слон elephant слоновый elephant (adj)
сода soda содовый soda (adj)
кит whale китовый whale (adj)
берёза birch берёзовый Ьirch (adj)
consistent (лих/лишний, but верх/верхю1й), and note that з and с mutate before
this suffix. Meanings are strictly relational except in а very few examples which
may have or acquire а qualitative meaning; e.g. крайний, средний, искренний:
вечер evening вечерний evening (adj)
лето summer летний summer (adj)
сосед neighbor соседний neighboring (adj)
край edge крайний extreme, last
СЕРЕд/СРЕД middle, as in средний middle (adj), cen-
середина, tral; average
среда
rод year -rодний: ежеrодний yearly
прошлогодний last year (adj)
новогодний New Year (adj)
позд late, as in поздний late
опоздают 'Ье
late'
вые high, as in вы- вь1шний higher
сокий 'high'
низ low, as in нижний lower
низ/кий 'low'
здесь here здешний from here, local
перед front передний front (adj)
Cf. isolated mutation of д in:
ПРЕД front прежний previous
вес/на spring весенний spring (adj)
Cf. вешний spring (adj) (poet)
ДАВ ago, as in давеча давний long ago (adj)
'recently' (colloq)
The enlarged suffix -шн'- builds а number of adjectives directly from adverbs, 1
including some older variants no Ionger current:
сеrодня today сегодняшний today's
вчера yesterday вчерашний yesterday's
тогда then тогдашний of that time
тамо (old form) there тамошний of that place
нь1не now ньrнешний present (of now)
дома at home домашний house, home (adj)
теnсре (old form) now теперешний present, of now
1 Since nюst of these adverbs end in vowels, а situation is created which is very unusual
1 Except that the type in -ов (and in older usage the type in -11н) has the short form in the
masculine neuter genitive singular and dati\'e singular also.
226 SECTION IV : ADJECТIVES
The type in -1111 is still in some use; the type in -ов is definitely archaic. Both
would Ье normally avoided Ьу Russian speakers in favor ofthe genitive; that is,
Sasha's son сын Саши rather than Сашин СЫН
Oleg's wife жена Олега rather than Олеrова жена
Persons (types built from nouns in the suffixes -ак, -11к, -н11к, -щ11к are somewhat
productive):
Ббг God Ббж/и/й God's
рыбак fisherman рыбач/и/й fisherman's
мужик peasant мужич/и/й peasant's
разбойник robber разббйнич/и/й robber's
помещик landowпer помещич/и/й landowner's
Note that the interrogative possessive pronoun ч/е/й is of the same type (in-
tcrrogative root element к plus suffix -/й-) and declension (ч/е/й, чь-я, чь-ю,
чь-ёгб, чь-их; e.g. чь/й-а, чь/й-у, чь/й-огб, чь/й-ь1х).
The suffix -1111- forms adjectives from masculine and feminine substantives
SUFFIXES WНICH BUILD QUALIТAТIVE ADJECТIVES 227
EXERCISE Recover the words from which the following adjectives are derived.
Try to estimate the words and then check your results in the dictionary.
образцовый паевой льняной тётин чиновничий
вишнёвый сырьевой сторонний крь1сий крысиный
гвоздевой нефтяной завтрашний девичий орлиный
Used with chemical elements, -11ст- sometimes designates -ous (vs. -и- for
-ic) in the chemical terminology:
азот nitrogen: азотистый nitrous азотный nitric
хлор chlorine: хлористый chlorous хлорный chloric
From adjectives derived from nouns are:
вода водяной water (adj) водянистый watery (fig), insipid
кровь кровяной Ыооd (adj) кровянистый Ыооdу, rich in Ыооd (as
meat)
мука мучной meal (adj) мучнистый mealy
-лив-: This suffix forms adjectives from verbal or deverbative (nominal) stems
denoting а tendency to the kind of action suggested Ьу the stem:
rоворить talk rоворливый talkative, loquacious
кричать (крик) shout крикливый loud, garish,
clamorous
берёrут save бережливый thrifty, economical
надоедят (надоесть) bore надоедливый boring
(по )слушаются оЬеу послушливый obedient
расчёт (раз/о/чтут) calculation расчётливый prudent, calculating
(calcula te)
шекотать tickle щекотливый ticklish, delicate
In а handful of cases -ш1в- is added to the infinitive stem rather than the
stem final consonant:
молчать Ье silent молчаливый silent, taciturn
терпеть bear, endure терпеливый patient
Adjectives in -лив- are also built from nominal stems; they have the mean-
ing of possession, often in а substantial quantity, of the noun involved:
талант talent талантливый talented
дождь rain дожливый rainy
SUFFIXES WНICH BUILD QUALIТAТIVE ADJECТIVES 229
слеза tear слезливый tearful, lachrymose
совесть conscience совестливый conscientious
or of the quality implied Ьу the noun if the noun denotes а person:
трус coward трусливый cowardly
урод freak, monster уродливый hideous, deformed
-чив-: Unlike adjectives in -лив-, adjectives in -ч11В- are derived only from verbal
and deverbative stems. They denote а tendency toward the action expressed in
the stem:
обма~frнуть deceive обманчивый deceitful
находить find находчивый resourceful
задумаются fall into (deep) задумчивый thoughtful, pensive
thought
настоять insist, persist настойчивый persistent
изменить change изменчивый changeaЫe
ДОХОДИТЬ get to, arrive доходчивый intelligiЫe, clear
уклониться deviate, avoid уклончивый evasive
сговориться соте to agreement сговорчивый compliant, tractaЬ!e
-оват-: This suffi.x, added to nominal stems, makes adjectives with the sense of
possessing some characteristics of the noun involved or reminding one of it in
some way:
ноздря nostril ноздреватый porous, spongy
уг/о/л angle, corner угловатый angular, awkward
плут rogue плутоватый roguish
замыс/е/л project, scheme замысловатый intricate, complicated
виноватый 'guilty' (вина 'guilt ') stands apart from this group.
-оват- is more important and productive as а suffix added to adjectives and
attenuating their force, much like the English suffix -ish:
крас/ный red красноватый reddish
дорогой expensive дороговатый rather expensive
старый old староватый oldish
плохой bad плоховатый sort of bad
-ат-: This suffix is usually added to nouns denoting parts of the body of human
beings or animals. The denotation is possession, sometimes to an enlarged or
exaggerated degree, of the part of the body involved:
волос(ы) hair волосатый hairy
борода beard бородатый bearded
рог horn роrатый horned
крыло wing крылатый winged
чрево maw,womb чреватый fraught (pregnant) (with
(obs) (последствиями) consequences, etc.)
Женатый 'married' does not follow the pattern of this group.
Аrather different suffix -ат- is comЬined with а number of nouns with а
stem ending in а suffixal -/к- or -/ц-, which mutates to ч before the -ат-. These
nouns have nothing to do with parts ofthe body, and the adjectives formed from
them Ьу this -ат- simply denote possession ofthe noun involved or ofthe quality
it suggests:
клет/ка check (design); cell клетчатый checked; cellular
пал/е/ц finger пальчатый digitated (botany)
створ/ка leaf, fold створчатый folding
верёв/ка rope верё~чатый ropelike
Enlarged suffix -чат-: This suffix, enlarged from the second (and not the first)
-ат-type above, forms adjectives denoting possession ofthe noun, often in great
quantity, or of а quality it suggests. For example:
узор pattern узорчатый patterned, figured
брев/но log бревенчатый timbered, of logs
половина half половинчатый indecisive, halfway (policy, etc.)
The suffix also forms а few adjectives from verbs with the denotation of а tend-
ency toward the action described in the verb:
расплывутся run together, diffuse распльшчатый diffuse(d), dim
вз/о/рваться explode взрь1вчатый explosive
-аст-: This suffix is parallel to the first -ат- suffix; it builds adjectives from nouns
denoting parts of the body of humans or animals. However, it emphasizes the
size of the part of the body much more and has а colloquial flavor:
рог horn рогастый having large horns (colloq)
борода beard бородастый with а large beard (рор)
глаз еуе глазастый big-eyed; popeyed (colloq)
горло throat горластый loud-voiced; vociferous (рор)
-
232 SECТION IV: ADJECТIVES
-ив-: This suffix, which gave rise to the productive types -шlВ- and -чив-, is it-
self unproductive. It builds а few adjectives from nominal stems:
краса (arch) Ьeauty красивый beautiful
правда truth правдивый truthful
в/о/шь louse вшивь~й lousy
An example of formation from an adjectival root is
ЛЕН lazy ленивый lazy
Enlarged suffix -овит-: This suffix has little or no productivity but builds а
somewhat greater number of adjectives than -ит-:
дар gift даровитый gifted
яд poison ядовитый poisonous
плод fruit плодовитый fruitful
EXERCISES Recover the words from which the following adjectives are derived.
Try to estimate the words and then check your results in the dictionary.
ВОЛОКНИСТЬIЙ торопливый сучковатый пластинчатый
шетинистый прихотливый грязноватый грудастый
мшистый завистливый клейкий полосатый
травянистый забь1вчивый ёмкий губчатый
углеродистый обидчивый далёкий иrривый
прижимистый переменчивый редкий льстивый
услужливый разборчивый ржавый мозговитый
Using а dictionary, give the meanings of and compare the following adjectives:
шерстяной - шерстистый стеклянный - стеклянистый
зубчатый - зубастый волосатый - волосастый
земляной - землистый железный - железистый
мускульный - мускулистый
кровяной - кровавый - кровянистый - кровный
SUFFIXES OF PARТICIPIAL ORIGIN 233
The suffixes building adjectives of participial origin belong to the five fol-
lowing groups.
1 An actual (long-form) participle must have the meaning "which ... " (i.e. Ье replaceaЫe
Ьу а-"который clause") and must satisfy certain formal requirements (see Ье\оw).
234 SECTION IV : ADJECТIVES
-ущ -ящ-
EXERCISE Using а dictionary if necessary, give the meanings of and compare the
following words:
rорящий - горячий - горючий
шипящий - шипучий
висящий - висячий
undergoing the action. The English equivalent of the \atter type is often an
adjective built with the suffix -аЬ/е/-iЬ/е.
-им-
-ём- -ом-
-вш- •Ш·
-ин- -н-
-ён -ённ-
-т-
развитой developed
открьпый open
- раздутый inflated; exaggerated
236 SECTION IV: ADJECТIVES
Finally, an older past participial suffix -л-, which became generalized for the
modern past tense and no longer operates participially, builds а fairly large num-
ber of adjectives from intransitive verbs. The formation of these adjectives is the
same as that of the past tense fonns, since the origin is the same. The denotation
is the state or condition resulting from the action of the verb. In most cases the
connection between the adjective and the verb from which it is derived remains
clear, though in а few it may become somewhat obscure (e.g. пошлый 'banal,
trite,' пойдут 'go '). Two important groups of adjectives are derived from ЕЙ
and (НУ) verbs with the intransitive sense "become":
устареют become obsolete устарелый obsolete
окаменеют petrify, become окаменелый petrified
like stone
спеют ripen спелый ripe
смеют dare смелый bold, daring
очерствеют become calloused, очерствелый calloused, hardened
hardened
блёк(ну)ть fade блёклый faded
мёрз(ну)ть freeze (intr) мёрзлый frozen
обрюзr(ну)ть grow fat and flabby обрюзглый fat апd flabby
тух(ну)ть become rotten тухлый rotten
кис(ну)ть turn sour кис/лый sour
The suffi.x has lost its diminutizing force in at least two common words:
малый small маленький small
хорош (short forms only) good-looking хорошенький good-looking
COMBINA TION
А COORDINAТION
Compound adjectives, like compound nouns, join together two stems,
directly or Ъу а connecting vowel (usually о (ё)). The relationship between the
two stems may Ье coordination, in which case а hyphen is usually found between
the cgnnecting vowel and the second stem; for example:
238 SECTION IV: ADJECТIYES
В SUBORDINA ТION
1 Noun preceded Ьу а modifier
Adjectives are built from nouns preceded Ьу adjectival or pronominal
modifiers Ьу adding а suffix (often -/н-). The stems are linked Ьу а connecting
vowel:
сельское хозяйство agriculture сельскохозяйственный agricultural
равные права equal rights равноправный having equal
rights
железная дороrа railroad железнодорожный railroad
МИЛЫЙ вид good (nice) МИЛОВИДНЫЙ good-looking
Iook
своё время its own своевременный opportune
time
бьrстрый ход fast speed быстроходный high-speed,
fast
широкий экран wide screen широкоэкранный wide-screen
(adj)
длинная волна Jong wave длинноволновый long-wave
(adj)
простая душа simple soul простодушный 1 simple-hearted
великая душа great soul великодушный I magnanimous
красная речь beautiful красноречивый 1 eloquent
speech
разные образы various разнообразный 1 diverse
forms
1А number of these nouns are correlated with paralle\ compound nouns in -иё; cf.
11ростодуш11е, великодушие, 11рот11вореч11е, разнообразие,
etc., рр. 202-203.
SUBORDINA TION 239
1 In any or all of the compound words below usage тау vary as to presence or absence
of secondary full or half stress.
2 Compounds containing а numeral as their first element do not ordinarily contain а con-
necting vowel; the first element is usually the genitive form of the numeral; e.g. двухэтажный,
трехэтажный, пятиэтажный, сорокаэтажный, nятндссятнэтажный. But note the normal con-
necting vowel in стоэтажный, тысячёлетннй. Most of the discussion of numerals as the first
element of compound nouns on р. 203 applies to compound adjectives with numerals as the
first .element.
240 SECTION IV : ADJECТIVES
EXERCISE Give the meanings of the following compound adjectives and recover the
word groups frrm which they are derived:
малодушный великодержавный вышеуказанный
своевольный широкоплечий пятиминутный
ROOT LIST
This Root List is а working list for practical use; it is neither exhaustive, nor
does it pretend to solve all the proЫems raised Ъу analysis of individual roots.
The considerations and criteria discussed in Section I on roots in general apply.
А final root paired consonant is regarded as neither hard nor soft. All roots are
designated as nominal, adjectival, or verbal (N, А, or v); the decision is usually
clear, though in certain cases opinions may vary as to the status assigned а root.
We recall (cf. page 15) that our categorization ofa root Ъу part ofspeech is based
not only on meaning but on how the root acts in the modern language (cf. page
16), rather than exclusively in terms of its origin. In а few cases, а root has split
into two parts of speech; often an older nominal root has become verbalized; for
example, БЕД, РЯД, ГОЛОС (nominal) but ГЛАС (the ChS variant: verbal).
See page 17 for а more detailed discussion.
The list contains about 650 common roots, not including variants. Most
of the important adjectival and verbal roots are included; nominal roots are
given in most cases only if they build words not directly related to their con-
crete meaning; for example, РУК and ГОЛОВ- ГЛАВ are given because they
build words like вь1руч11ть 'rescue,' поруч11ть 'entrust а task' as well as рука
243
244 ROOT LIST
260
INDEX OF ADJECТIVAL SUFFIXES 261
Below is а subject index designed to provide quick reference to both general and
specific headings and also to provide general definitions and explanations of
some of the concepts and terms encountered in the book. In most cases the first
(or only) page cited in an entry will provide а definition, if one is needed, but the
index also contains certain definitions and explanations when the book may not
contain а handy or explicit summation; these are given after co/ons. 1n this sense
the index serves as а glossary and it fulfills this function also in that it cross-
references alphabetically the linguistic terms defined in the unalphabetized
"glossary" with which Section I begins. These items are given, in capital letters
along with the pages on which they are defined; e.g.
VELARS, defined, 4
Cross references to terms listed in the index itself are printed in sma/1 capita/s;
e.g.
compound nouns See сомв1NдТЮN