David Wen-Wei Chang (Auth.) - China Under Deng Xiaoping - Political and Economic Reform-Palgrave Macmillan UK (1988)
David Wen-Wei Chang (Auth.) - China Under Deng Xiaoping - Political and Economic Reform-Palgrave Macmillan UK (1988)
Palgrave Macmillan
ISBN 978-0-333-55220-9 ISBN 978-1-349-12391-9 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-12391-9
ISBN 978-0-312-04811-2
ProLogue XIll
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Sources of Research Materials 3
1.2 New Dynamism in the Reform 4
1.3 Deng's Unique Preparation in Leadership
Succession 5
1.4 The Challenge of Economic Reform 6
1.5 The Challenge of 'One Country, Two Systems' 7
1.6 The Crisis of Ideological Void 9
1.7 The Promise of G NP Quadrupling by the Year
2000 10
1.8 The Impact of a New Open Door Policy 11
1.9 New Orientation in Historical Perspectives 13
1.10 Many Questions but No Answers 16
and never deviate from it' and, second, 'we must proceed from this
reality and not jump over this stage'. He warned those who might
disagree by saying: 'Under the specific historical conditions of
contemporary China, to believe the Chinese people cannot take the
socialist road without going through the stage of fully developed
capitalism is a mechanistic view on the question of the development
of revolution, which is the major cognitive root of right-deviationist
mistakes. On the other hand, to believe that it is possible to jump
over the primary stage of socialism in which the productive forces are
to be highly developed is a utopian view on this question, which is the
major cognitive root of leftist mistakes.' Thus the correct and basic
theory at this 'primary stage' must be for the party to lead the nation
in a united, self-reliant and pioneering struggle to convert China into
a rich, strong, democratic and modern socialist state by concentrating
on economic development as the central task without abandoning the
four cardinal principles (democratic dictatorship, the Communist
leadership, Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, and the
socialist path). In policy practice, Zhao's report accentuated the need
rapidly to advance educational, scientific-technological and economic
development through rational reforms at horne and widening the
contacts with the outside world. The 13th Congress has adopted
Zhao's theory of 'primary-stage socialism' unique to China alone,
This itself is a major revision of Marxism to add 'Chinese
Characteristics' .
On economic restructuring, Zhao emphasised socialist reforms to
incIude different types of ownership, maintenance of predominant
public ownership, and development of private sectors in the
economy. The main focus is to change the 'managerial mechanism of
enterprises' and to institute 'systems of planning' on investment,
allocation of resources, finance, currency policy and international
trade. Together these measures will enable China to establish a basic
'framework for a planned commodity economy' which should be able
to integrate planning with the market. The Premier admitted the
difference in ownership as the major variation between socialist and
capitalist commodity economies. In short, he asserted in the report
that 'the state regulates the market, and the market guides the
enterprises' .
On party-building, Zhao reported that the existing policy is correct
in making ranks of cadres 'more revolutionary, younger, better
educated and more competent' . This reform effort should be
implemented at the central level among leading bodies of the party.
xxii Prologue
D.W.-W.C.
1 Introduction
This book is an interpretation of events in China from which various
concIusions can be drawn. What has happened in China since Deng
Xiaoping's last return to power has occurred within a time span of only
a few years. There is a continuing sense of revolutionary urgency for
change, adjustments, reorganisation, decentralisation or broad
reform. The process in Deng's words is 'an experiment'. I Indeed
research into the last several years on public policy indicates that Deng
and his administrators did not at first have a blueprint for policy
changes on many fronts. They have carefully allowed minor and
regional initiatives in economic development, for example, to
experiment and to succeed before the adoption of a major policy by
the central government. This process of peaceful reform is so great in
its ultimate impact that Deng Xiaoping, the leader of the regime and
the mastermind of all major changes, has called the process 'a second
revolution,.2 This book will pinpoint and interpret some of these
changes in the current revolutionary process in China. The author fully
recognises the risk and danger involved in making this 'simplified'
description and 'preliminary' or tentative interpretation of some of the
possible or likely consequences of Deng's experimental and revolu-
tionary reforms in China today.
My interpretation will be influenced by my understanding of
changes since the Hsinhai Revolution in 1911 under Sun Yat-sen's
non-Marxian democratic leadership. J must admit also that my
understanding of Imperial China's more than 2000 years of institu-
ti on al and cultural heritage has strongly influenced my judgement.
Some of the revolutionary leaders have, in fact, exercised their
politicalleadership with only minor behavioural changes in themselves
from that of past tyrannical emperors. Furthermore, the monumental
ideological and eeonomic differenees between Sun's democratic
revolution of 1911 and Mao Zedong's Marxist revolution of 1949 have
turned out to be of no major signifieance to the broad masses of the
nation, although such an 'ideological divide' caused many battles for
deeades among Chinese intelleetuals, who themselves have gone
through many uncomfortable times in twentieth-eentury China. They
now find a new ideologieal cIimate in the nation.
My interpretation of eurrent events will foeus on the two major
revolutions of 1911 and 1949 and several other major and bitter events.
I shall not review the history of major events in detail. However, J trust
1
2 China Under Deng Xiaoping
that informed readers will easily see my views (and biases too) which
can be taken as reflections of a former citizen of that nation who
attempts to understand and interpret changes and events within the
Chinese historical and modern revolutionary context. These views
may seem somewhat out of li ne or strange to my Western colleagues,
but I simply convey the views of many other Chinese in China. I am
still affected by my past education in China some thirty years ago. In
this book, more than anything else I am more concerned about trends
of future change, ideology in politics, and the long-term consequences
of current major policies which have been relentlessly implemented
since Deng's return to power. China experts, especially policy makers
of the West in the last seventy years or so, have also frequently
changed their views about China. Often they were caught by
unexpected surprises that suddenly occurred in China contrary to their
expectations or earlier conclusions. The same is also typically true
even for some Chinese intellectuals who for forty years argued about
the corruption ofthe Nationalist government before 1949. They were
themselves soon suppressed and humiliated by Mao Zedong during
the cultural revolution. They have, today, awakened to a new reality
that truth and ideology can only come from practice. In fact the whole
Chinese population has come through a nightmare it experienced
during Mao's last decade as an 'imperial ruler' in China. My position
has been greatly influenced by research and interviews with many
simple or educated Chinese who are factory workers, farmers,
schoolteachers, party cadres, factory managers, university intellec-
tuals, merchants, and students. I have also held discussions with a few
of high-level party officials in China today. Wh at I have seen and what
they have told me during the last few years constitute the basis for my
views in this volume of interpretation. I am grateful to those who
spoke to me in plain Chinese language with such intimacy not usually
extended to a Westerner. I am equally thankful to those cadres and
officials who asked me not to quote their names and positions in the
government.
Briefly, this book will concentrate on Chinese political leadership
succession, ideological void, socialism with Chinese characteristics,
rural economic change, urban economic restructuring, and the
problems concerning Hong Kong and Taiwan. All of these issues have
been central to Deng's careful examination of policy making. These
issues are intimately related to the ideologically struggling factions
now within the communist party, or to their emotional commitment to
unify the country through a formula of 'one country, two systems'.
Introduction 3
For the first time in the history of the communist world a country's
leader has sought out individuals of different age groups to succeed
hirn in leadership before his own departure from the other scene.
Stalin and the East European Communist leaders did not do so, nor
did Sukarno of Indonesia, Nehru of India, Park Chung-hee of South
Korea and Marcos of the Philippines. It is also curious to note that all
Chinese leaders (except perhaps Sun Yat-sen), that is Chiang
Kai-shek, Lee Kuan-Yew and Mao Zedong, have each, during their
lifetime, guided their followers implicitly toward leadership succes-
sion. But none acted in the same unselfish way as Deng. Deng hirnself
refuses to occupy the official se at of power. He does so to impress upon
his fellow colleagues to do likewise within the Communist Party
(CCP). More research should be done at the appropriate future time
6 China Under Deng Xiaoping
to understand the actual inner politics of the CCP since the 3rd Session
of the 11th Central Committee (CC) in 1978 when Deng's supporters
won out against those who followed the then Premier Hua Guofeng.
Not only did Deng hirnself decline to occupy the highest position
officially, he was also able to persuade many others to retire. In
addition to those who will succeed hirn immediately after his death, he
has brought together many much younger leaders into high office to
succeed his immediate successors. This provision will be described in
detail. That Deng has done such an expert job with leadership
succession is a unique tribute to his ingenuity and ability to act within
the political system. Party reform itself has been a crucial factor in
leadership transition. Intra-party unity in many communist states was
achieved through purges, something which Deng skilfully avoided.
Deng's succession is certainly an exception to communist rule. The
transition from one-man helmsmanship under Deng to a form of
collective leadership will be tested on its workability when Deng is no
longer available to lead and arbitrate. The criteria by which Deng has
chosen younger leaders seem to assure that a substantial degree of
harmony will continue through the division of labour at the top level.
This is the most pressing area for reform in view of continuing poverty
in China as compared with Hong Kong, Taiwan and the other
surrounding countries of South Korea, Japan, Malaysia and Singa-
pore. China did follow the Soviet economic model at first and failed. It
went on to experiment in Mao's own model of the commune and the
Great Leap Forward in the late 1950s. This, too, failed. Instead of
abandoning his revolutionary radicalism, Mao put the country under
his personal domination from 1966 until his death in 1976. His
uncontrolled cultural revolution disrupted the leadership and
unleashed Lin Biao and Jiang Qing in a cruel power struggle. The
common people paid an untold price and sacrificed a great deal in their
economic well-being when production in many cities and factories was
stopped, transportation interrupted, and civil government replaced.
Economic reform today under Deng not only has replaced the 'decade
of horror', but has also set down a new realistic order of priority in
economic development: rural recovery and free marketing, urban
enterprise responsibility autonomy, expansion of light industry, and
rational planning in heavy industrial development. The story of
lntroduction 7
example, the latter will become a local government of thc PRC despite
all other favourable promises. Likewise, Hong Kong will definitely
hope to become an 'un-interfered' free port at best under a central
government which must still deal with many issues directly affecting
Hong Kong's autonomy. Tbe stationing of defence forces in Hong
Kong, for example, is an obvious serious concern and controversial
issue.
Will Beijing policy officials understand the various needs, including
self-government, of the Chinese in Hong Kong? Can the central
government help Hong Kong to be independent in its commercial
relations with the outside world? How will the free flow of Hong
Kong's experience affect the economic and political development
inside China? Will Hong Kong be an asset or a liability to the central
government in its impact after the return? Many similar questions and
concerns can be raised about the unification with Taiwan, which is in
all respects an independent state with a long working relation with
many countries of the world. The political system which has emerged
in Taiwan is a unique one. Tbrough reforms and modifications the
system is basically acceptable to the people on the island who do not
feel at all eager to join the PRC. However, pressure for unification and
from internal factors compel the government of both the PRC and the
ROC to insist on their separate stands so far taken on unification.
Chapter 7 will deal in detail with 'one country, two systems' , especially
the attached conditions of both sides on unification and the difficulties
in finding reconciliation between them. Tbe island of Taiwan is
presently a majortrading partnerofthe United States which it ranks as
number five in volume of trade. The Taiwan Relations Act of the US
Congress promises defensive arms supply to the island since the formal
diplomatic severance between Washington and Taipei. These close
relations bring Washington's measure of influence on the scene
concerning the ultimate destiny of Taiwan. On the other hand,
relations between the United States and the People's Republic of
China will never be correct, let alone friendly, as long as the United
States is angrily perceived as being interventionistic in China's internal
affairs and as being a dishonest party to the joint Shanghai Communi-
que of February of 1972, in which it pledged non-interference in the
Chinese internal affairs in clear language: 'There is but one China, and
Taiwan is apart of China ... " 'unification is for the Chinese to
describe'. US involvement will also be discussed in detail in view of
Beijing's pledge to resolve the issue of unification before the end of the
century.
Introduction 9
The entire thrust of the Chinese effort has been devoted to 'double the
GNP twice' by the year 2000, using China's GNP of 1980 as the base.
Several major policy documents will be examined and described to
provide a fresh basis for the new economic planning and reform. I shall
report on my case study of rl!ral interviews and on my visit to Shenzhen
Economic Special Zone in 1985. I have learned from several industrial
cities in Manchuria (Da Qing Oilfield, Chang Chun, Shenyang,
Dalian and Harbin, etc.) through interviewing factory leaders on
decision-making practice in their enterprises. My visit to Nanhai
county in rural China was most interesting. I discovered how local and
country cadres from 1979 onward have stimulated and promoted the
campaign for rural economic changes. The replacement of rural
communes set up at Mao's insistence in 1958 was politically too
dangerous for any cadre to advocate officially. There seemed to have
been no national policy discussion on the fate of the communes until
the peasants themselves slowly started dividing up land for more
efficient farming. Without anational policy, the pe asants had only the
half-hearted support or acquiescence of some courageous commune
cadres. The increase in working incentive for farmers suddenly
demonstrated to officials at the highest level that the 'truth has come
from practice'. Premier Zhao Ziyang and Vice-premier Wan Li in
Sichuan and Anhui provinces further demonstrated their initiatives in
policy leadership in the field of agricultural reform. Their success may
be responsible for earning them the leadership at the national level.
Today they are the two front leaders in national economic reform. The
Introduction 11
China's door has been opened and closed several times: in 1842,
1899, and 1949. Eaeh time when the door was either opened or closed,
there were major implieations. For example, after 2000 years of
self-sufficiency and voluntary isolation, she was forced to stay open in
1899 under pressure from Secretary of State John Hay, presumably for
the nation's own survival. This was a time when China had suffered
half a century of foreign invasions from the West and Japan and was
likely to be cut into 'Spheres of infIuence'. The foreign yoke of
imperialism, as guaranteed by the unequal and humiliating treaties
were not completely removed until after the Second World War. The
term 'open door' of that period carried with it a very ugly connotation.
The Chinese and Sun Yat-sen wanted to keep the door open on 'equal
12 China Under Deng Xiaoping
However, no government can res ist the cry for democratic participa-
ti on and the respect for human rights, although few non-Western
nations can fully implement them successfully. 11 This common cry for
democracy constitutes part of the essence of modernisation. The May
4th movement of 1919 in China succinctly pointed out the
long-term political orientation, namely, democracy on the one hand
and science on the other. They constituted seemingly the only
long-term way to modernise China. The same 'democracy' and
'seienee' of 1919 remained valid in 1949 and in 1976 to persistently
ehallenge both the Nationalist government and the eommunist
government for their fulfilment.
Given this historical eontext and modern revolutionary expectation,
it may not be diffieult to speeulate what Deng Xiaoping should do for
China at the end of the four modernisations, namely, to build an
independent, demoeratie, respected, modern industrial state eapable
of self-defenee and willing to contribute to international pe ace and
seeurity. Ideologieal specification of whatever artifieial brand remains
merely a teehnique, a trade mark, an artifieially devised intelleetual
meehanism to inspire unity and support at horne and to attraet foreign
followers see king a way toward the future. Deng, Mao and others have
all been Chinese patriots first. They each sought politieal power to
make strategie poliey decisions, although Mao seemed to have
pursued the vanity ofpower to satisfy his personal ego. Vanity and ego
satisfaetion usually lead to corruption of power and the downfall of the
individual. More discussion on this will be included in the last chapter.
As a matter of historical perspeetive, what have the Chinese people
and their leaders learned through their sueeessive revolutions and the
rise and fall of severalleaders? Sueh questions surely ean not be easily
and adequately answered. They ean, however, be approaehed
indireetly. One may feel that the Chinese people, including the
intelleetuals, ought to realise that, like the Japanese and the Indians,
they eannot eradieate their historieal heritage through a eultural
revolution. Any form of modernisation must reeognise a nation's past
legaey as a valuable experienee and a powerful influenee. Sun Yat-sen,
for example, eould not easily introduee into China a 'strange Western
demoeratie politieal system' at the turn of the eountry. Chiang
Kai-shek and his advisers did not know how and when to implement
Sun's 'Three Prineiples of the People'. Mao and his followers
vaeillated between their support of the Nationalist Government
betweenl923-45, and the making of a revolution of their own whieh
Mao led to vietory in 1949. But Mao unwisely destroyed his early
Introduction 15
achievement before his death. Deng today profits from these valuable
experiences as the single most powerfulleader in China who is guiding
the Chinese ship in a stormy ocean through peaceful reform. He wants
peaceful reform not violent revolution.
Still, what do the Chinese intellectuals and average people
themselves want in their national development? They honestly think
about preserving their historical heritage and enjoy fair treatment at
the hands of their own government. They do not want to be treated as
'stinking intellectuals' who desire to express views that are different
from those of their government. They want eventually a democratic
political system to channel popular and genuine participation. They
prefer the system of rule of law which Deng calls 'Socialist legality'.
They expect political equality for all citizens and individuals who shall
resist any privileged party seeking to perpetuate dass or political
power. They want certain fundamental constitutional rights which no
government or any leader in power can take away from them. It seems
these are the long-term fundamental concerns that many Chinese
today think about seriously. They have been taught a bitter lesson
since 1911 and during the cultural revolution when mad Mao Zedong
became a 'tyrannical human god' .
In short, the following chapters will deal explicitly or implicitly with
the various issues raised in this introduction. It is a study of reflection
which will inevitably hinge on my personal bias and preference. I shall
allow my former experience and recent travels in China to guide me to
formulate observations and judgements. The entire study may imply
an effort to speculate constantly about how a different China may
emerge through Deng's leadership and his policy of peaceful reform
which he calls 'a second revolution'. And finally, it will be argued,
explicitly and implicitly, that in the next thirty to fifty years China may
have a good opportunity to emerge as a relatively 'open democracy
with Chinese characteristics'. The dividing line between Sun's
democracy of the 'Three Principles of the People' and Deng's
'Socialism with Chinese Characteristics' may be much blurred, if it
does not disappear totally. Until then, the unification between Taiwan
and the mainland will not be easily advanced, although both
governments in Beijing and Taipei will continue to pledge effort for
unification on their own separate terms. Any sign ofTaiwan's moving
away from the irreversible trend toward unification will be suicidal. It
is useful for both sides of the Taiwan Strait to be reminded of the words
in the famous Shanghai Communique of 1972 that 'there is but one
China, and Taiwan is apart of China'. Non-political and non-negoti-
16 China Under Deng Xiaoping
criticism, and freedom of the press and assembly, etc. are essential
individual rights which must be enforced by the government on behalf
of every citizen. Such rights are in conformity with the human rights
charter of the United Nations. How can China avoid value conflicts of
this sort in dealing with the foreign nations whose people are coming
into individual contact with Chinese citizens in China and abroad?
Another set of unanswerable questions at this stage concerns the
prospect of how far China will be reformed politically, especially in
terms of political structure and process. For example, will there be a
constitutional separation of powers between the party, the executive,
the legislature and the judiciary? Can we assurne that China will
abandon the Soviet model of institutions and politics? Will there be
open competition in the election process, such as an open system of
nomination of candidates and campaign activities of different political
parties? Can the Chinese legislative body acquire equality in policy
making with the State Council? Can judicial process be free of political
and ideological influence to apply law and punishment on the basis of
the rule of law only? These kinds of questions have, perhaps, little
significance now. They will, however, be likely to assurne greater
significance when Chinese society becomes more open and as China
moves away from the Soviet model. Further questions can be asked.
Will the Chinese political system emerge into a non-Western consulta-
tive polity which accepts power monopoly by one strong party, with
non-adversarial participation gran ted to several minor political par-
ties? Or will 'Socialist legality' be developed along the Japanese
experience of one party dominance in the executive, with minor
parties confronting the cabinet through legislative inquisition but
unable to affect policy outcome?
Is it correct to assume that standard Western parliamentary
democracy is alien not only to China but also to many other
non-Western states? China has, in particular, a long political tradition
of its own. And there is no such Westernised political culture in favour
of standard Western democracy in China. Therefore, it is impractical
to expect China to follow Western political development. It can also be
observed that one-party government is common in East Asia in both
communist and non-communist states, Korea, Taiwan, and even in
Singapore, where single party rule remains a fact, althoughJapan has a
few minor opposition parties in the Diet. These Japanese opposition
parties have since 1947 never been able to form a single cabinet.
Perhaps it is unfair to expect China to become a two-party or
multi-party democracy. Wh at kind of democracy do Chinese people
18 China Under Deng Xiaoping
want and what kind can they get is as yet an unanswerable question.
For nearly eighty years since the revolution of 1911, Chinese
revolutionaries and intellectuals have fought for political democracy
and freedom. So far they have not succeeded. Perhaps they did not
truly understand that Western parlimentary democracy cannot be
transplanted to Chinese soil either from the USA or England.
However, Democracy as a way of life and an ideal value concept can
never die among Chinese intellectuals and revolutionaries until they
truly know wh at democracy is and until China can independently
institutionalise her own form of democracy. The Japanese, for
example, developed their own version only after the Second World
War. Perhaps, this is what Deng has in mi nd about China's 'Socialist
democracy' in the future. Deng, too, may not know as yet what is to be
the precise content and practice of his 'Socialist democracy'. Thus, it
remains to be seen how a 'democracy with Chinese characteristics' is to
be defined.
As the chief architect of the current reform, Deng must take all
things into consideration. What he must insist upon includes what he
must not say. Political necessity dictates what is to come about through
experimental reform. There is a long listof major themes he always
emphasises. It is, perhaps, very appropriate to summarise what he said
at the September 1985, party conference. The highlights of his speech
there included the progress already made and the task still ahead. He
made an evaluation of the past seven years of reform achievement and
offered an agenda of issues to stress in the coming decade. They
include in summary as folIows: 12
1. Present circumstances and reform. 'Every one has seen that the last
seven years have been the best and key significant period since
1949. We did two things during the difficult period: eliminate
disorder and return to normal, and initiate the overall or
comprehensive reform. For years we were victimised by emphasis
on class struggle in neglect of production forces ... Now, on the
basis of the four cardinal principles ... our result of success has been
the struggle against leftist mistakes. Without the four cardinal
principles we could not have preserved unity in the country. Our
reform in rural areas stirred up three years of conflict since
1978 ... Since the Third Plenum of the Twelfth Congress emphasis
has been concentrated on urban reform. On the basis of agricultu-
ral success, we have now launched urban comprehensive
economic restructuring. Reforms have increased production
forces, but also brought on aseries of in-depth changes in our
Introduction 19
21
22 China Under Deng Xiaoping
up the commune lands before the central government policy was even
formulated. Deng is different from Mao who preferred to impose on
the people what he thought was absolutely right and ideologically
progressive. Deng is prepared, on the other hand, to consult and take
advice from the people so as to 'have both centralism and democracy' .
To combine discipline with flexibility under Deng today is to build
unity with diversity. If more people are able to see hirn as a modern
revolutionary with a tradition al pragmatism, Deng's socialist demo-
cracy will easily be seen as a genuine substitute' for the Communist
utopia.
Deng is a unique leader in modern China in a number of unusual
ways. For example, twice he was ousted and twice he wrote personal
letters to Mao Zedong and Hua Guofeng to get hirnself back into a
leadership position. Before he was reinstated in 1973, he had written
to Mao for an opportunity to rededicate hirnself in service to the
nation. Mao circulated his letters among top party leaders before his
reinstatement. 2 While Zhou was hospitalised in 1974-5, Deng was
effectively in charge of the military affairs (as Chief of Political
Department of the PLA) , the Party Affairs (as one of the
Vice-chairmen of the party) and as the First Vice-premier of the State
Council. He was the busiest politician and the third in the leadership
hierarchy next to Mao and Zhou. He worked diligently in new policy
orientation and in party rebuilding after Lin Biao's downfall. He was
in confrontation and in conflict with the 'Gang of Four'. 3 He
antagonised them so much as to cause his second downfall immedi-
ately after Zhou's death.
Deng wrote to Premier Hua immediately after Mao's death in
September, 1976, for an opportunity to return to the government. Hua
was cautious in handling his reply. But he wrote to Hua again. The
support for Deng's return was so overwhelming that Hua had no
choice but to reinstate hirn in 1977. The 'shared leadership' in the
decision-making process since his reinstatement lasted fifteen months
only, prior to the Third Session of the Eleventh Central Committee in
late 1978. During the session Deng's policy on new political
orientation and economic adjustment received the majority support.
Although Hua's 'little leap forward' in the economic field was
criticised and defeated, Hua hirnself remained as Premier and party
chairman.
The uniqueness in Deng's leadership might have come from the fact
that he is the only centralleader who has travelled widely abroad since
the 1920s. He has a living experience of several years in liberal-de-
Deng's Return and Reform 23
our practice has always been the party in control of the gun, not the
gun in control of the party. This tradition was interrupted by Lin
Biao as defence minister since 1959 and especially during his later
years. Now the good tradition is gone, military budget is too
large ... training for battlefield is inadequate. Chairman Mao lately
has suggested reforms in the armed forces. The size of the army must
be reduced; tradition restored. There is much work to be done in the
three headquarters of the staff division, the political division and the
logistics division. 4
Mao's death on 6 September Hua was able to get himself elected by the
Politburo to be chairman of the party to succeed Mao and Chairman
of the powerful Military Affairs Committee of the Communist party.
This was a position from which Mao dominated the armed forces. It is
the same position Deng holds today. Secondly the majority of the
members in the Politburo were still Maoist. Hua had resisted strongly
and artfully Deng's return to power. As mentioned earlier, Deng
himself wrote to Hua to indicate his wishes to serve the country and the
party. Hua did his best to postpone Deng's return in order to better
fortify his own defence. However, pressure came from many
directions demanding his return. Several strong military leaders also
urged his resumption of power, induding Deng's dose friend Xu
Shiyou of the Guangzhou military command. Vice premier Li
Xiannian, now president of the country, and defence minister Yi
Jianying, 'the king maker after Mao's death' , were the strong voices of
the moderate faction on Deng's behalf. The media and the public
eagerly expected his resumption of leadership in some major posts in
the party and in the government.
Meanwhile, the Gang of Four sat in goal. But those who had been
dose associates of Jiang Qing were still in high posts. Some of them
were members of the highest policy-making body, the politburo.
Others were in the State Council or cabinet as ministers and vice
premiers. And a few high military commanders had also been strong
supporters of Jiang Qing, induding Chen Xilian, the Beijing military
district commander. These factionalleaders had lost their chiefs since
the arrest of the Gang of Four through joint efforts of Hua and the
defence minister, Yi Jianying, and Wang Tong Xing who had been
dosest to Mao as director ofthe party central office. In short, Hua was
in a very precarious position. On the one hand, he dearly needed the
support from all anti-moderate forces against Deng. However, he had
to arrest the Gang of Four who were Deng's arch enemies. Hua could
not hold on to his leadership without the support of moderate Li
Xiannian, Yi Jianying and several military commanders. Without a
strong base of political power of his own in the party and the
government, Hua eventually gave up in 1977 and Deng came back to
power in J uly 1977.
It is easy to understand the lack of leadership stability in Beijing
when Mao died. The Gang of Four made a bid for power. They wanted
Zhang Chunqiao to be the premier. Jiang Qing hoped to become the
party chief. Even Wang Hung Wen expected to be the head ofstate. It
was rumoured that Wang Hung Wen had had his official photo made
32 China Under Deng Xiaoping
actual power over policy making of his own government. Deng won
the struggle without advancing himself into higher offices. He
remained as Vice-premier until his official retirement from govern-
ment, but not from his important post in the party as chairman of the
Military Affairs Committee. 8 Deng's success resulted from several
major steps. First of all, he speeded up the rehabilitation process to
bring back to leadership many well-known victims of the cultural
revolution. For example, Chen Yun had been chairman of state
planning commission since the early 1950s. Peng Zhen was the
powerful mayor of Bei jing before his purge in early 1960s as a elose ally
of Liu Shaoqi. General Wang Zhen and Field Marshall Luo Ruiqing
were well-known leaders of the People's Liberation Army. Other
leaders, ineluding Yang Dezhi, Keng Biao, Wan Li, and most
important of all, Hu Yaobang, were all back in power shortly after
Deng's own rehabilitation for the second time in 1977. His second
major action was to remove those who 'helicoptered' themselves to the
membership of the political bureau as benefactors of the cultural
revolution. They had been elose allies of Jiang Qing or 'unconditional
yes men' of chairman Mao. After the removal ofWu De, the mayor of
Beijing, Chen Yongqui, the hero of Dachai, Ji Dengkui, a vice-
premier and Wang Dong Xing, a party vice chairman, Hua's position
in the political bureau was drastically weakened, while Deng's suppor-
ters grew more numerous. It was, however, a zigzag struggle. Some of
the members in the political bureau did not want to be closely
identified with apower struggle. For example, General Li Desheng,
the commander of the Zhenyang military district and a benefactor of
the cultural revolution, and Deng's own early elose ally, General Xu
Shiyou, objected to campaigns against Mao. Even Li Xiannian and Yi
Jianying feit that Hua Guofeng could be preserved to join the
moderate new leadership under Deng. However, by the Fifth Plenum
of the Eleventh Congress in 1979, Hua's position in the political
bureau was much weakened. His resignation from the premiership and
party chairmanship was expected but he fought to delay it again.
On the other hand, Deng advocated party collective leadership
against Mao's era of 'deified helmsmanship' . He suggested the
abolition of party chairmanship in the new draft party consitution in
favour of restoration of the party secretariat which Mao abolished dur-
ing the cultural revolution. Deng also gained from nationwide TV
broadcasting the open trial of the Gang of Four to fully discredit the
'tyrants' of the leftist radicals. The final most critical reason for Deng's
political victory was his ability to instigate are-evaluation of Mao's
34 China Under Deng Xiaoping
land reform, and successful urban socialist construction during the first
Five-year Plan (1952-6). The document complained that Mao depar-
ted from and compromised the party's correct position on economic,
political and social development as adopted at the Eighth Congress in
1956. The nation in 1954 began its orderly constitutional practice of the
'New People's Democracy' and successfully persuaded the intellec-
tuals in the early 1950s to join in national development. However,
Mao personally initiated the 'catastrophic failure' plan of economic
development since 1957 against the loyal and patient advice of Liu
Shaoqi, Zhou Enlai, Chen Yun, Deng Xiaoping, Zhu De and others
who collectively tried to persuade Mao to agree to and to adopt, for
example, Chen Yun's proposal on economic planning on the basis of
actual reality. In the interest of the country and with a concern for the
well-being of the masses, Deng Xiaoping's proposal on reform of
industrial enterprises, improvement over enterprise management and
worker's participation in enterprise decision making was ignored by
Mao. Zhu De's suggestion on the need to diversify cottage industry
and the need for a multiple management approach toward agriculture
and Deng Zihwei's urgent recommendation for the adoption of a farm-
ing responsibility system were also rejected by Mao in the late 1950s.
All these critical proposals for adjustment and reform in the late
1950s could have been adopted had it not been for Mao's opposition in
favour of his own commune and the 'great leap' policy. Tbe document
admits that the party under Mao's leadership mistakenly classified
many loyal intellectuals within and outside the party as 'anti-regime
rightists' and subjected them to unjustifiable humiliation and purge.
Mao's radical leftist subjectivism, blindness, arrogance and the
unrealistic expectation of very high agricultural and industrial
production were indefensible. The failure of Mao after the Lu-shan
conference in July 1959 to reverse his fatal mistakes of the 'commune'
and the 'leap' was compounded by his mobilisation within the party to
oppose comrade Peng Dehuai and other so-called 'rightists'. Mao
arrogantly insisted on his subjectivism to cause political and economic
sacrifice and suffering by the masses. Fortunately, later at the party's
Central Working Conferenee in January 1962, some of Mao's
political and eeonomic poliey mistakes were adjusted or partially
eorreeted. The majority of those wrongly aeeused by Mao at the
Lu-shan eonferenee were rehabilitated. However, Mao persisted in
wrongly expanding 'the dass conflict' whieh again caused in 1964-5
many cadres to suffer. Mao's subjeetive ideological eriticism was again
intensified against intelleetuals in 1964-5. He failed to appreeiate the
36 China Under Deng Xiaoping
party's effort to bring the economy back on the right course toward
modemisation in industry and defence. The mistakes of the anti-right-
ist movement and economic catastrophe during the ten-year period,
1956-66, should mainly fall on Mao's shoulders. His personal
dictatorship seriously damaged the party's democratic centralism.
'Personality cult was not corrected ... these mistakes led eventually to
the outbreak of the cultural revolution. 10
The document correctly summarised Mao's worst behaviour which
contradicted Mao's own writing during the cultural revolution,
1966-76. He personally led the 'ten years of horror' on the false
accusation that the party, the army, the government and the cultural
sphere had been infiltrated by 'a great number of capitalist representa-
tives and anti-revolutionary revisionists'. They had penetrated, he
insisted, all levels of the government and organisation. Mao further
insisted, the document says, that there was no other way but to
mobilise the masses to 'openly and completely' uncover them in order
to regain political power by the proletarian dass. Events proved that
Mao himself violated the precepts of Marxism and misjudged the
existing reality. The document repudiates Mao's charges as follows:
(1) there were no facts to prove the takeover of the country by the
capitalists and the revisionists; (2) the cultural revolution purged
those who were actually the leading cadres of the party and in the
country; (3) only in name did the cultural revolution rely on the
masses. It, in fact, deviated from the masses and the party; (4) events
proved that the cultural revolution was not and could not in any sense
be called a revolution or social progress. It was not 'a struggle against
enemy'. It was a 'self-distortion and confusion'. The cultural
revolution itself had 'neither economie nor politieal basis. It could not
propose any constructive policies. It merely created serious disorder
and destruetion ... It brought for the party, the country and the citizens
of all nationalities internal ealamities. ,11
The document against Mao further specifies how Premier Zhou
Enlai worked to preserve order and unity and how the Lin Biao and
Jiang Qing factions plotted against Zhou and against each other. It
described how Mao vacillated and failed to support Deng after Zhou's
death and failed again after the 5 April 1976 revolutionary incident at
the Tiananmen Square. The rest of the document turns to Deng's
struggle to rehabilitate many leaders and cadres since 1977 and the
failure of Hua Guofeng to create his new leadership after Mao's death.
Instead, Hua followed dosely in almost every respect Mao's footsteps,
especially in his support for Mao's Dachai agricultural poliey and a
Deng's Return and Reform 37
investigate and suggest what the people could do best for themselves.
He also permitted urban small shop owners to open their own little
business in self-help. In only a few years between 1975-8, Zhao's new
reform policy had produced great positive results. There was no more
starvation in Sichuan. People's income increased. New jobs multiplied
and absorbed the surplus labour in both rural and urban areas.
Economic activities diversified and multiplied. There was other new
innovation and new momentum as a result of a new profit-making
incentive on the part of the people. In short, Governor Zhao created a
'Sichuan model' of economic reform. His experience became known
nationwide. In addition, Sichuan is Deng's home province. Deng
could not help he ar about the miraele-like reform success. The whole
nation should now benefit from such a success in the aftermath of the
commune's catastrophic failure.
Deng and Zhao had very little direct working experience together.
Their paths did not cross until after the cultural revolution. However,
Zhao was an expert in economic reform in the late 1970s and Deng
needed such leaders to execute his policy of four modernisations. Zhao
is a self-taught innovative leader who 'learned by doing'.
In 1976, while Deng was out of office and stayed in Guangdong,
Zhao joined Deng's cause in common opposition against the Gang of
Four who were then strong in Beijing. When the Deng-Hu group in
1978 publiely deelared their 'Truth through Practice' , some supported
it while it was opposed by others. Many remained non-committal as an
indirect expression of approval. Zhao, however, enthusiastically
advocated it, and so entered the leadership core of Deng's camp. With
his economic expertise and reform experience, Zhao is best suited
today to translate Deng's four modernisations into policy execution.
Besides, Zhao is an impressive and confident individual who handles
the media and media people expertly. He thinks fast and is good at
public relations. He is also known for his skill at reconciling conflicts in
the decision-making process and in handling personnel issues. Zhao
has been highly praised by colleagues and bureaucratic followers as an
efficient and effective administrator. He appears to have some of the
unique qualities of former premier Zhou Enlai. Therefore, Deng and
Zhao today share a division of leadership, with each enjoying an
exclusive sphere of control. For example, Deng is the final arbiter of
policy conflict and chief innovator of policy measures and directions.
Zhao remains in daily elose charge of party bureaucracy and party
control of ideology and personnel policy-making. Zhao, on the other
hand, is the supreme administrator and innovator of programme
Deng's Return and Reform 43
rural reform expert. He was one of the authors to draft the urban
economic restructuring package in 1984.
4. Wu Xueqian, age sixty-five, foreign minister since 1982, a Hu
Yaobang confidant. This year he was promoted to be a member of
the Political Bureau.
5. Qiao Shi, age sixty-three, a new face in top leadership. In 1985 he was
made a member of the Political Bureau and the Secretariat. There
is very little known about his distant or recent past. In 1987 became
a member of the Standing Committee of Politburo.
6. Yao Yilin, age seventy, has been one of the four vice-premiers
and until now an alternate member of the Political Bureau. He has
been known as an economic expert on oil development. Yao is a
confidant of President Li Xiannian of the Republic. In 1987 become
a member of the Standing Committee of Politburo.
7. Hao Jianxiu, age fifty-two, the only woman among the eight to be
promoted to the Secretariat.
8. Wang Zhaoguo, age forty-six, a former car factory manager, the
youngest among the eight. He is now a member of the Secretariat.
In short, from 1977 to 1985, Deng has fought all the way to create
and stabilise a pragmatic leadership in the party and government. It
can be said that he has succeeded weil in peacefulleadership reform.
Mao could not do this without a blood bath. Deng has done it with
popular acclamation. There lies the difference between an ideological
visionary and a pragmatic realist. One leader's failure created the
circumstances politically and ideologically for another to succeed.
Deng came back to power at the right time when the abused nation
was waiting for such aleader to emerge. Hua Guofeng was not
prepared nor experienced enough to initiate what Deng had long
prepared to do if the opportunity should come, which it finally did.
Could Deng's sucessors afford to do less than Deng? In January 1987
Deng removed Hu in order to balance off resistance from the leftists to
save his continuing reform.
Before Mao's death, Zhou and Deng had acquired their popular
approval and support throughout the country. This was repeatedly
expressed by the common citizens and those who resented Mao and his
46 China Under Deng Xiaoping
wife during the cultural revolution and during the succession struggle
immediately after Zhou's death on 8 January 1976. The people were
bitter and sad when the Gang of Four did not allow the media to be
more fully used during the mourning for Zhou. They were stunned
when Deng was not made Zhou's successor. Most citizens in China
were happy three months later when the people in Beijing expressed
their mourning for Zhou on the memorial day at the Tiananmen
Square which led to Jiang Qing's angry decision to suppress such
spontaneous shows of emotion and respect for Zhou. Thus, on 5 April
1976, violence occurred.
Zhou and Deng have shared a common cause against the Gang of
Four. Deng also inherited Zhou's legacy of popularity to add to his
own. Without this popularity throughout the country, Deng could not
easily and realistically dream of areturn to leadership. He knew weil
the country and people were on his side in the leadership struggle. He
understood, of course, that more was at stake than his personal cause.
The supporters of Jiang Qing, Lin Biao and Hua Guofeng within the
party, the army and the government knew also the outrage of the
people against them. Deng's task was to fight the Maoists, the Huaists,
and the followers of Jiang Qing and Lin Biao. He had to win the
majority support of the party, army and those who would make
political decisions. But how to win support was still a problem and a
major crisis for Deng, in addition to strengthening his own popular
support. To broaden the party's support, he declared his Four
Cardinal Principles once back in power. Furthermore, to redeem the
party Deng had to reform the party which had been radicalised and
controlled by his political enemies. He had to consolidate the armed
forces under the command of the party and within his personal control.
However, the military was dangerously divided ideologically between
those supporting Jiang Qing and those loyal to the Lin Biao faction or
devoted to the defence of Mao's legacy. Deng had worked with all
these factions and divisions at every level of government, party and the
army. As a political pragmatist, he mended their conflicts, divided his
enemies, and won them over to his point of view. This immediate
political crisis for unity under hhn required Deng to pledge his loyalty
to Marxism, party leadership, the socialist path, and proletarian
democratic centralism. In the long run, these four principles will also
help him retain all the necessary support to build a 'New Socialism with
Chinese Characteristics'. Therefore, he had to assure those in the
Deng's Return and Reform 47
party, the army and the government that he would not abandon any of
the fundamental tenets of the communist revolution.
In the realm of ideology, Deng hirnself has always been a Marxist
revolutionary. He could not possibly abandon any single one of the
four cardinal principles, especially the leadership of the party and Mao
Zedong Thought in order to silence his opponents who are still doubtful
of his ideological commitment. In the long run, his reform would no
doubt work only at the expense of his ideological rivals. Thus Deng
had to reasure them that a new capitalist China would not emerge.
Moreover, Deng hirnself might not know the long-term ideological
implication of his reform or 'peaceful revolution'. Where will China be
ideologically twenty or thirty years from now as a result of Deng's
experiment in reform? How will Deng's 'reform experiment' end in
terms of changes in the political system and a new economic entity? It
is quite possible that Deng hirnself could not tell in 1978 shortly after
his victory at the Third Plenum of the Eleventh Party Congress. It is
also possible that Deng did not wish to anticipate ideological
development. The future can be left to future generations to decide
that issue. He only needed to be sure that whatever he did was right
and necessary at the time. Therefore, ideologically in both the short
and the long run, Deng's insistence on the four cardinal principles has
been realistic and expedient. These principles summarised weIl wh at
all Marxists can agree upon and want to follow or achieve. It is within
these guiding principles that a new ideological framework can emerge
as 'truth from practice'. This stand as taken in late 1978 by Deng and
his associations has provided them with the freedom of choice to
experiment in 'Socialism with Chinese Characteristics'. Within the
scope of these four cardinal principles, they can promote also new
policies to carry out their other concrete pledges which include (1)
socialist legality; (2) collective leadership; and (3) a united front with
other political parties through the CPPCC (Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference, which has existed since 1949 but largely as
window dressing). What is the extent of practice of the rule of law as
suggested by 'socialist legality'? At what level of practice will Deng's
'collective leadership' be implemented? What are the 'characteristics'
of his 'Chinese Socialism'? There are no precise answers, but one can
speculate that this is precisely what Deng intends now in order to
provide definitive alterations in future years. It may be quite possible
that by the year 2000 AD China's economic and cultural relations
48 China Under Deng Xiaoping
with Japan, North Ameriea and West Europe will have become so
dose that ideological and politieal reform will occur with ease. A
rieher middle-dass society will emerge eventually. We can, then,
determine ideologically the new guidelines for 'Socialism with Chinese
Characteristics' .
For immediate domestic political necessity against factionalleader-
ship struggles in China today, the four cardinal principles have been
officially supported by the party through its propaganda department
and government controlled media. The public cannot compromise it at
all. Tbe official basis for political unity comes from Marxism-Leninism
and Mao Zedong Thought. In short, Deng's four cardinal principles
have performed weil satisfying the immediate or short-term needs of
the reformers. Following the official line, the four principles can be
easily summarised.
Insistence on the four cardinal principles (socialist path, people's
democratic centralism, communist party leadership, and Marxism-
-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought) is perceived politically as a
fundamental necessity to assure the success of the four modernisations
(in agriculture, industry, defence, and in science and technology). The
argument of the official party line 'on primary conditions' is to provide
a basis for politieal education to guide the whole nation toward
socialist revolution. Without unity of the party on rededication to
these 'high sounding' and 'guiding' principles, confusion, defeatism
and unexpected new conflicts may emerge within the party and
disorient the masses. Deng seems sincere in his commitment to these
four principles. His power would have been at risk if he had lost party
support and if he had suggested any strange revolutionary ideology
which none could understand. Deng had to reaffirm his dedication to
the four principles before party reform is achieved. Changes in
ideology must wait for new experience in coming decades. As a
pragmatist, Deng certainly was not prepared to decIare, for example, in
1978 that Marxism, being more than one hundred years old, cannot be
expected be solve China's problems. 17 Ideology cannot be abandoned
overnight. Any shift to new ideology is, by the same token, difficult to
accept. Deng knows only too weil the urgency to reform from past
failures. He does not need to worry about the ideology of his reform
experiment. He only needed to announce the basis and goal of his
reform poliey. The broad goal that all wanted to he ar and strive to
achieve induded, for example, better living standards for all citizens,
rural and urban economic reforms, party unity, school reform, and
Deng's Return and Reform 49
Deng Xiaoping and Chen Yun are the most senior leaders since the
retirement of Marshall Yi Jianying in 1985. Their entire life history
since the 1920s has been filled with experiments and challenges.
Success or failure in the past symbolised their party's idealism and
mistakes which brought for the Chinese People many memories
between hope and despair . As an objective observer of the communist
movement in China, one is forced to conclude that in domestic policies
the Communist party leadership seemed blind on many fronts. In the
area of land policy alone, for example, there were the following:
Autumn Harvest Uprising in 1927; Land Reform in Northwestern
China without substantial improvement of the rural living standard;
land to the tillers in 1949-52, land confiscation from the family tillers
in 1955-7, and the commune disaster of 1958-79. These zigzag
Deng's Return and Reform 55
There are also external challenges that may come from uncertain-
ties, confusions, threats and trade competition in the international
arena. The following may be illustrative of an unending list of issues:
While Deng is on the political scene, these problems may not even
exist or assurne any great significance. Looking beyond hirn and even
beyond his immediate successors, however, many unexpected difficul-
ties may occur. Deng's reform experiment has been under way only a
few years. Much remains to be institutionalised, routinised, revised or
changed. On the positive side, Deng remains physically healthy. He
has anticipated many of the problems just cited. For example, party
reform is under way and has progressed as planned. New, young and
dedicated cadres equipped with greater professional skill, better
educational background, and a vigorous revolutionary spirit are being
placed vertically at all levels of the party. The economic growth is
moving ahead better than expected, especially in rural development
where people are much more able to organise themselves with only
minor assistance from the government. Intellectuals are much
appreciated and better paid than in the past. Thus, the capacity to
sustain challenge has been more than sufficient.
For the first time since the revolution of 1911, the Chinese people
are promised a definable long period of peace in economic develop-
ment. Civil war, warlordism, and foreign aggression are all out of the
question. The government under Deng provides rational guidelines to
allow the people to work and experiment for their own material
benefit. The people welcome such an opportunity wh ich should have
come to them in the early 1950s. When the government retreats, the
people are able to take care of the interest of the country and those of
their own. In short, China is a nation on the move today. Ironically,
the greater the improvement in the people's living standard, the faster
their expectation rises. This is the common challenge for all Third
World nations. In order to build a new nation both materially and
spiritually Deng must accept the Chinese cultural heritage, not the
foreign utopian model of democratic socialism. But only a modernised
open and democratic society is capable of meeting global challenges
and the internal demand for freedom and equality in the long run.
Democracy cannot be accomplished in one or two generations.
However, faithful dedication and liberal experiment must be
maintained without any interruption. Deng appears willing and
capable of contributing to such a strong foundation. Otherwise, his
effort is but another short-term experiment in peaceful reform, which
may end with his departure.
An account of Deng's success in reform during the last several years
since his return in 1977 looks, indeed, impressive. For example, he has
58 China Under Deng Xiaoping
removed and discredited the Gang of Four, Hua Guofeng and his
associates, the major blind followers of Mao from within the party, the
army and the government. Above all, he has successfully and artfully
criticised and evaluated Mao in order to unite the party, the army and
the masses against the personality cult. A giant step was taken in
September 1985 in placing the third tier leaders at all levels in the
party.27 Rapid economic development is under way in both rural and
urban areas. In short, Deng, as an experienced fighter and shrewd
planner, has carried out his 'grand reform' step by step and stage by
stage through persuasion and with dignity for all in the process of
leadership transformation. Deng himself has provided much counsel
on the goals of his reform through speeches at different times. At the
Twelfth Party Congress in 1982, he said: 28
60
New Political Orientation and Economic Development 61
measures was for hirnself as leader not to occupy any institutional top
position either in the party or the government. Therefore, he can
easily persuade his follow colleagues to be equally unselfish and to
convince the citizens on the basis of his dedication to the future of the
nation. As a result, he has been in a much better position than Mao,
Zhou and Liu Shaoqi, to exercise personalleadership.
worked out aseries of policies and carried out many reforms with
marked success. Since April 1979, we have called for economic
readjustment, restructuring, consolidation and improvement. The
masses and cadres support these correct party policies. But they
fear these to be changed again. These will not be changed, or only
the implementation measures, not the policies, can be shifted.'
6. 'We must firmly maintain the four cardinal principles - namely,
keeping to the socialist road, upholding the people's democratic
dictatorahip, upholding leadership by the communist party and
Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought. No one should be
allowed to undermine these principles ... The core of the four
cardinal principles is upholding the leadership by the communist
party. We have said many times that without the leadership by the
party a big country like China would be torn by strife and incapable
of accomplishing anything. Whether inside or outside the party, all
tendencies towards weakening, breaking away from, opposing or
liquidating leadership by the party must be criticised ....
Leadership by the party is the key to the success of the four
modernisations and of current readjustment.'
7. 'The work style of a political party in power has a direct bearing
upon its very survival. We must strictly implement the guiding
principles for inner-party political life and strive unremittingly to
correct all bad trends. In particular, we must oppose the erroneous,
two-faced attitude of those who feign compliance with the line,
principles and policies ... while actually opposing them. Reform of
the system, of the party and of state leadership must be carried out
in an orderly fashion.
8. 'We should continue to develop socialist democracy and improve
socialist legal system ... There are still inadequacies in our
democratic system, so it is necessary to draw up a whole series of
laws, decrees and regulations to institutionalise democracy and
give it legal sanction. Socialist democracy and socialist Iegality are
inseparable. Democracy without socialist legality, without the
party's leadership and without discipline and order is definitely not
socialist democracy. On the contrary, that sort of democracy would
only plunge our country once again into anarchy and make it harder
to truly democratise the life of the country, develop the economy
and raise the people's standard of living.'
9. Democratic centralism and collective leadership 'should be
genuinely practised in inner-party life as weil as in the country's
politicallife. ,7 It is also necessary to take firm action against all
74 China Under Deng Xiaoping
1. While still vice-premier and the most likely sucessor to Zhou and
Mao, Deng spoke out on 25 January 1975, about consolidation in
the People's Liberation Army (PLA). The major policy statements
he made include: (1) 'with this army of ours, the party commands
the gun, and not vice versa ... However, it was thrown into
considerable chaos after Lin Biao was put in charge of army work in
1959, and especially in the later period under hirn ... We must
reduce the size of it, confront the problem of over staffing and
restore the army's fine traditions. The Headquarters of the General
Staff, the General Political Department and the General Logistics
Department bear major responsibility. They should be the first to
be consoIidated. We must set things right in the armed forces in
accordance with Comrade Mao Zedong's instruction on stability
and unity ... Future appointment and promotion will deal with
those heavily involved in factional activities or cling stubbornly to
factional ways; (2) Deng re-emphasised Mao's past insistence on
military discipline of the 'three main rules and eight points for
attention,;8 (3) 'There can be no mistake about the principles I have
just mentioned in terms of military consolidation, stability and
unity, and the implementation of party policies. We must restore
party spirit, eliminate factionalism and improve efficiency and
discipline.' What he mentioned as future policy guides began to be
implemented only after his third return to leadership in 1978 and in
1984 with the reduction of one million in size.
2. On 5 March 1975, Deng spoke of building up 'an independent,
comprehensive industrial and economic system by 1980' as the
first step, and as the second step by 2000 to turn China into a
'powerful socialist country with modern agriculture, industry,
national defence and science and technology'. Deng challenged
his political enemies who 'only dare to make revolution but not to
promote production'. He warned of China's weak transporta-
tion system, especially the inadequate railroad system. Again later
in this speech he attacked factionalism and said 'persons engaged
in factionaIism should be re-educated and their leaders
opposed ... If they correct their mistakes, then we will let by-gones
be by-gones, but if they refuse to mend their ways, they will be
sternly dealt with.'
78 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Given Mao's failure in his economic policy and the resultant poverty of
China vis-a-vis the relative prosperity and higher living standards of
her neighbours, new economic policy emphases were worked out by
1975 under Zhou-Deng and summarised in Zhou Enlai's January
speech on the four modernisations of his government. Seven years
later, Hu Yaobang's Report to the 12th Party Congress on 1
September 1982, gave more detailed emphases to policy priority
New Political Orientation and Economic Development 81
will be inspired to work with greater drive to usher in the new period of
vigorous economic growth.>21 It now appears that China is concen-
trating on control of inflation, economic stability, new expansion in
banking institutions, finance and eredit balance, prevention of trade
imbalance and means of long-term stability. During the past several
years, concentration on long-term goals include: (1) emphasis on key
urgent development projeets; (2) a greater effort to improve the
people's living standards; (3) upholding the dominating position of the
state owned portion of the economy while diversifying economic forms
of production; (4) proper supervision over the leading role of the
planned sector of the eeonomy while eneouraging the supplementary
role of market regulation; and (5) preservation of the basic policy of
economic self-reliance while encouraging foreign investment and
borrowing or purchasing foreign technology. These various emphases
and approaches have been maintained when the Seventh Five-Year
Plan began in 1986. So far it seems to be impossible to oontrol
economic fluctuations during this period of massive reform.
One of the most important documents on reform measures of the
economic restructuring was adopted on 20 October 1984, at the Third
Plenum of the Twelfth Party Central Committee. 22 This was a
document on poliey implementation which sought to institutionalise
the economic structural foundation to meet the greater challenge of
growth in nine basic areas - for example, the training of party cadres,
the industrial and human resouree training, and the development of a
strong and capable managerial class to man the some 40,000
enterprises currently under reform toward efficient and responsible
autonomy. Overheating of the economy in 198~, Ru Yaobang's
resignation affecting adversely foreign capital inflow in 1987, and new
erisis in declining food production in 1987-8 seem to illustrate many
inevitable problems associated with massive economic changes. There
may be future unexpected problems in the 1990s to affect adversely the
economic steady growth.
4 Broad Implementation of
the New Economic
Strategy
This chapter will focus on macro-implementation of the new economic
strategy since the Third Plenum of the Eleventh Party Congress in late
1978. The period of major readjustment is near its completion.
Restructuring, consolidation and improvement are being carried out
simultaneously during the Sixth Five-year Plan (1981-5). The
discovery of the impact from rural economic decontrol, relaxation of
politics and the fresh start toward rapid economic diversification and
expansion has generated additional optimism toward urban economic
reform both in scope and depth. In asense, pressure for rapid urban
economic reform is to acommodate the rural expansion and to bridge
the increasing mutual dependence between the rural and the urban
sectors of the growing economy. Unlike the lock-up rural policy under
Mao, Deng's poliey is to free 80 per eent of the population and let them
foHow their own destiny as being better for growth. The government
has helped them reeover from region to region, while the government
itself has fuHy concentrated on urban heavy industrial reform for
greater expansion. Today, partial economic freedom in rural China
has brought new vitality and strength to the entire eeonomy. This
chapter will touch upon a few major reform documents as a means to
implement broadly the new eeonomie strategy.
4.1 ECONOMICSTRUCTURALREFORM
92
Broad Implementation 0/the New Economic Strategy 93
1. 'Adhere to the principle of see king truth from facts and making
steady progress and resolutely guard against blindly pursuing a
higher rate of development and vying with one another to this end.'
He expressed his faith in quadrupling the nation's economic growth
value by the end of the century. The nation should see, he said,
'better results rather than too high a growth rate';
2. 'Invigorate the economy and improve management.' The premier
asserted that 'we should continue to emancipate our minds and
stress opening China to the outside world'. We should, he said,
'have control over major issues and flexibility on minor ones'.
3. 'Take overall interest into consideration and overcome selfish
departmentalisation.' He warned all 'localities and departments'
not to interfere with the unified policy decisions and plans of the
central government and damage the overall interest of the country;
4. 'Continue to follow the principle of gradually improving the
people's living standards through increased production, and of
building the country through thrift and hard work.' He feels it
wrong to seek blindly a higher level of consumption regardless of
productive capacity and actual conditions;
5. 'Continue to check all unhealthy practices and remove all
obstacles to the current reform.' He listed several malpractices as
being extremely harmful to the reform: excessive bonuses and
allowances in cash or in kind, profiteering, price raising, power
abusing in reselling goods of short supply, giving lavish dinner
parties and gifts, and offering and taking bribes.
106 China Under Deng Xiaoping
people must be 'basically balanced'. Extra plan attention for 1985 was
given to the urgent production of high quality commodities to meet
market demand, especially in areas of textile products, household
appliances, brand name bicycles and foodstuffs to 'suit people's
changing consumption patterns'. Some commodity shortages will be
supplemented by imports to meet more urgent consumption demands
in accordance with the plan. The plan for 1985 called for vigorous
development of tertiary industry, especially in the areas of repair and
service trades. The quality of service industries must improve to meet
popular needs and safety standards.
Regarding relations with the outside world, the 1985 plan called for
a total volume of two way trade at 126.5 billion yuan. Some
restructuring in foreign trade must be made to harmonise with the
regulations of the State Council to achieve greater trade expansion.
Expansion in exports through vigorous campaigns was called for the
purpose of bringing in more foreign currencies to pay for China's
import needs. The plan emphasised the following areas for fast
development: (1) the Four Special Economic Zones; (2) the newly
announced opening of fourteen coastal cities; (3) Hainan Island, the
Yangtze River delta, the Pearl River delta and Southern Fujian
Province.
In the fields of education and intellectual resources, the 1985
development plan called for rapid expansion and utilisation of known
scientific and technological achievements in China. Better economic
results depend on their rapjd transformation into industrial and
modern agricultural production. Funds were budgeted for pilot
projects, industrial experiments, and, especially for the 'transfer of
advanced technologies from the defence industry and scientific
research to civilian use'. Emphasis was also made to apply new
technology to transform the traditional cottage industries. In 1985,
one of the major reforms took place in July in the field of educational
administration. Vice premier Li Peng was put in charge of education as
the head of the Educational Committee which absorbed the existing
Department of Education of the State Council. For example, the 1985
development plan projected an enrolment of 41,000 post-graduates
and 522,000 undergraduates in higher education. More students
were encouraged to take short-term training at the college level.
Faculty improvement and field specialisation were also emphasised.
The restructuring of secondary education had begun, vocational
schools were being rapidly promoted, and in the economically
backward areas, compulsory primary education was strictly enforced.
110 China Under Deng Xiaoping
bonds 6 billion yuan; and (4) construction funds for key energy
and transport projects to be 12 billion yuan. Budget expenditure has
the following breakdown: (1) capital construction 48.363 billion yuan
(an increase of 1.1 per cent over 1984; (2) subsidies to enterprises
for technological transformation and the manufacturing of new
products, 5.26 billion (a decrease by 46.5 per cent from 1984); (3)
allocations for geological prospecting, 2.75 billion (a 5 per cent rise
over 1984); (4) aid to rural economy 9.4 (as in 1984); (5) allocation
for urban construction and maintenance project and for civil defence
5.45 billion (33.5 per cent increase); (6) expenses for culture,
education, science and public health 29.3 billion; (7) national
defence account 18.67 billion; (8) administrative account 11. 9 billion;
(9) repayment of foreign loans and interests 2.8 billion; (10) general
reserve fund 1.5 billion; and (11) meat price subsidy 2.2 billion.
The budget office is known to be determined to help maintain an
economic stability with minimum budget expansion and little deficit
if at all. Secondly, the budget office was conscious of its increased
spending relative to price and wage reforms in 1985. Wage reform in
government departments and institutions alone required 3 billion
yuan as increased expenditure.
When the budget office reported on the execution of the 1985
budget, the budget officer voiced in the new budget message of
April, 1985 several urgent guidelines which are summarised as
followsY
erate new vitality into the publicly owned enterprises'. Two key
important goals of the seventh plan are namely: (1) to greatly improve
enterprises' economic efficiency; and (2) to vastly increase exports to
gain foreign exchange. His speech went on to cover other political and
social aspects relevant to the Seventh Five-Year Plan for 1986-90. The
premier went on to report the Draft Recommendation of the Seventh
Five-year Plan. 20 A few major points of the draft recommendation to
the party national conference of September 1985 are summarised as
folIows. The conference approved it as the basis for further
micro-planning by State Council for submission to the
fourth session of the National People's Congress.
The draft recommendation reviewed the economically POOf state of
1980 when Deng's new economic strategy began. The review cited
an increase of 80 per cent in the standard of living in rural China
during the 1980-5 period. It noted the continuing problems and
weaknesses of the economy, including weak agriculture, a food and
clothing crisis in remote regions of the country, lack of information
systems, raw materials supply and human resource development.
The draft recommendation listed the following guiding principles to
be followed:
1. Reform takes the first priority to accompany construction;
2. Insistenee on balance between society's total demand and total
supply
3. High production performance and improvement in commodity
quality be seriously emphasised;
4. Strengthen socialist cultural-spiritual construction; 1986-90, as the
period to fundamentally lay the foundation for 'a new model in
socialist eeonomie system with Chinese eharacteristics';
5. Maintain an annual GNP at about 7 per cent during the plan period
to avoid other economie problems;
6. Place emphasis on policy research and policy making as 'an organic
structural part of the planning process'.
On development strategy and guiding principles, the draft recom-
mendation provides a suggestion in three major areas: (1) to meet the
people's consumption demands and changes in spending; (2) to
eoncentrate on technological transformation, internal reform and
expansion of existing enterprises in order to expand production; (3)
correctly solve relations among geographie regions in their economic
development. Six major guiding principles are suggested in the draft
plan:
Broad Implementation ofthe New Economic Strategy 119
The review of the three documents above has, perhaps, given the
reader a broad picture of economic problems and developments in
China. It is, therefore, clear that China since 1980 has been transform-
ing its economy from one of a Maoist socialist model which broke
down to one of a Dengist new model which continues to change. The
transformation of reform does not have a new economic ideology
independent from Marxist and Maoist framework. However, the
substance of reform has taken on a very new and different approach to
adapt China's economic structure and growth toward capitalist
operations. But the Chinese economy will not be capitalistic because
of the public ownership and planning in the changing economy. In
theory, it can no longer be called socialism because it follows 'from
each according to his work or worth' that 'work more gets more, work
less gets less'. This competition is found in China now to be the only
way to stimulate and revitalize the economy for rapid growth which the
country must have in order to avoid the national starvation and
poverty of the past thirty years. By 1990, if reform and restructuring
has been completed, the Chinese economy will probably be growing
much faster and will be far better managed according to Western
capitalistic criteria. If successful, the new Chinese model will attract
global attention. This will me an one quarter of mankind under one
huge bureaucracy has profi ted from an indigenous innovation to
'combine public ownership and western management' - or 'socialism
within capitalism'. If, by 1990, the continuity of reform does not reach
the original goal, which is unlikely, more readjustment and new
experiment may be required, but there will be no return to the Soviet
model or Maoist utopia.
The reform measures have been under severe ideological and
political constraints from Deng's political opponents who are half-
heartedly in favour of his reform in both approach and result. This is so
because of their Marxist-Maoist ideology which has prevented them
from seeing progress in the capitalist world. The only offer to justify
what has taken place in the economic field is that the reform is
practical. And the common masses in China like it and benefit from it.
They have no faith in Maoism. Deng offers instead pragmatism. The
masses resent Mao and what he did during the cultural revolution, so
Deng and his colleagues are politically popular. This is the positive
aspect of the political environment. The negative aspects include party
factionalism and the doubtful followers who were purged by Mao,
rehabilitated by Deng and may not ideologically go all the way with
Deng on his economic reform and new orientation. In short, Deng's
122 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Professor Xue confidently declared that the rural reform success will
continue to move toward more improvement, while determined policy
attention now direct at 'more complicated and more difficult urban
reform'. If successful, he said, 'China will be a socialist state full of
economic vitality on earth. It will, then, produce long-term global
consequences' .22 China has al ready decentralised most of the sm all
size publicly owned enterprises which are now totally responsible for
their own profit or loss after income tax to the government. Only some
6000 largest and medium-sized enterprises are being slowly guided
toward self-accountability, seIf-management over profit or loss to
avoid 'Big rice bowl dependence of the state'. These largest and
medium-sized enterprises must pay income taxes amounting to 60 per
cent of their total financial incomes. In order to maximise efficiency
and profit at the micro-enterprise level, the government must
revitalise the macro-economic control.
One of China's current more serious problems is wage reform to
avoid decades of wage equalisation practice. The fear, however, is that
wage adjustment may go over the budgeted expectation to flood the
consumer market with large sums of cash. If so, it will affect price
stability. If housing construction, for example, progresses too rapidly,
it too will create new currency problems. Such examples illustrate a
lack of economic infrastructure to handle problems and a great lack of
management knowledge in China. Academic research in this area was
not possible in the past. Foreign experience on macro-management
did not come to China until recently. Presently, Chinese economists
124 China Under Deng Xiaoping
126
Rural Economic Development 127
I could feel the changes brought about in the village by the new
economic policies immediately. These changes were shown not only
in the abstract figures of a threefold increase in average income,
from 100 yuan to over 300, but also to the smiling faces and
optimistic words of the local people ... Before the Communist
Party's Third Plenum in 1978, the village had very little sideline
production or industry. But soon after this crucial meeting, at which
new and flexible economic policies were adopted, the village's
si deli ne production developed rapidly. And this was followed by the
swift growth of its industrial enterprises. These changes altered the
Rural Economic Development 129
was less production and more poverty which was further accentuated
by natural disasters and still lower productivity. China's failure to
develop foreign trade was in itself a denial of wealth wh ich could have
easily accumulated capital gains through international trade competi-
tion in which Taiwan and Japan have done their best and become
wealthy. Wrong emphases of planning made 'better progress' in less
needed areas and 'less progress' in much needed areas. For example,
Table 5.1 shows less production in grain and clothing and more in steel
and oil. 12
workers to rural areas from which they had been recruited only two
years previously. Through drastic readjustment in 1961--63, the
economy got back on track for normal growth. It would have been
utterly impossible to restore the economy 'without correcting bad
planning'. Centralised micro-economic planning can easily go wrong
as admitted in arecent publication: 13
We failed to observe the law of value and did not adjust the prices of
agricultural and industrial products in accordance with changes in
the cost of production. We did not strictly adhere to the principle of
'to each according to his work' and did not raise the living standards
of the workers and pe asants in proportion to improvements in
labour productivity. As a result, there was an excessive concentra-
tion of revenue in the hands of the state.
Having recovered from the nightmare of her economic failure
through overly centralised micro-economic planning, China is now
moving toward more macro-economic planning to allow flexibility and
incentive in the economic operation and production: 14
The state plan should therefore deal with such things as the overall
direction of economic development; the rate of growth; the balance
between the major economic spheres; the scale and regional
distribution of capital construction, investment allocation, major
projects and the rate of improvement in living standards. In
addition, it must take care of the balance between finance, credit,
materials and foreign exchange.
Imbalance in planning until 1978 was, in short, greatly responsible
for the suffering endured by the peasants. First of all , the central plan
emphasised heavy industry over light industrial development.
Secondly, the plan locked up pe asants in their own locale as prisoners
bondaged to their commune's stagnation. Thirdly, the government
took away food and grain through purchasing at fixed low prices and in
big quotas. Farmers subsisted on whatever was left. It was, therefore,
very difficult to raise living standards by the pe asants themselves
through production. The more they produced, the more the govern-
ment took away on a quota basis with fixed low prices. Urban workers
and 'white collar' staff members appeared to have gained in per capita
income as shown in Table 5.2. 15
Rural Economic Development 135
My first visit to rural China took pi ace in 1979 after exactly thirty years
of living abroad. I went through many communes, brigades, produc-
tion teams and many visitation briefs wh ich were made available
usually to Chinese descendents of foreign nationality. Wh at I had seen
in 1979 was quite different from what I later saw in my subsequent trips
to the same cities and provinces. Rural China was about to undergo
rapid changes in 1979. My family and I visited a dozen cities and
provinces in my first trip where we had relatives and friends. We
acquired a new Japanese expensive camera with long lens for my son to
take pictures of memorable sights and events. Everywhere we went we
were given briefs by local cadres and school principles. We went to see
many schools, health clinics, factories and recreation centres, and
hospitals. I was much affected by what I saw after thirty years, and was
able to compare wh at I saw and heard of the plight of rural China with
what lieft behind before 1949. Some of the things pleased me weIl,
while others saddened me for weeks and months afterwards. We had
relatives to visit in Kuangzhou, Shanghai, Beijing, Xian, and Yanan.
Therefore, this first trip gave me a general coverage of several regions
in China for my own comparison of the differences from region to
region. My other trips to Guangxi, Yunan, Hubei, Sichuan and
Manchurian provinces gave me still a deeper and wider scope for
comparison. I can categorically declare that while in theory egalitar-
ianism and equal share of Obig rice bowl' for all was supposed to be
true, the reality of shocking differences in living standards between
different regions in China was, and still is, incredibly sharp. A
commune member in the suburbs of Shanghai or Guangzhou enjoys a
much higher living standard than his counterpart in the suburbs of
Xian or Yanan. In China, villagers are destined to accept whatever the
locality is able to provide. Comparison on the basis of the so-called
egalitarianism is simply deceiving.
136 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Chinese villagers have in general, since 1949, lived a better life free
of robbery, theft, feudallandlord exploitation, and starvation from
natural calamities and disasters. They have not, however, been fully
free from rigid government control and from the stagnated commune
system until recently. The better living today consists of electric wells,
electric mills, bicycles, and sewing machines which rural people did
not universally have until recently. Peasants have always loved the
land, and this was their major reason for accepting the communist
revolution in the first place. I found in 1979 that villagers were
generally resigned to destiny and with a sense of powerlessness to do
anything for themselves. They had no incentive to do anything for the
country or the government. Villagers did not' appear to care for
anything, nor understand what they could have read from local
newspapers. And more likely they did not agree with whatever the
newspaper said. It was a shock for me to have discovered this common
negative attitude. They knew nothing could be done to improve their
own lives. However, when I listened to the short briefs by commune
cadres I heard only glowing pictures and lovely statistics. In 1979 I saw
only communes and brigades in operation. The responsibility system had
not been implemented yet in areas where I visited. Small cities and
towns were dead places as compared with the former commerciallife
before 1949. In rural China there were only early morning roadside
'free marketing' near population centres. I suspected in 1979 that some
of the trading was bartered between goods with little currency as the
medium. In 1982, 1984 and 1985, however, all that I had seen a few
years ago had changed. Free marketing in rural China has become a
nationwide phenomenon. Cash has become the only medium of
commercial transactions. It was incredibly exciting to see the new
varieties of goods brought to rural markets. Indeed, it has become the
centre of rural economic free activities. One can see rural China has
come back to life after some thirty years. Peasants love this new
freedom, which they lost unexpectedly after rural collectivisation
during the middle 1950s. They are eager to improve their living
conditions. That is to say that with less government they can make
more improvements through self-help.
Better rural land utilisation and economic improvement have
resulted from the dismantling of the commune system entirely or
through its reform. This change has been the heart of Deng's new rural
development. The process of this change differed from region to
region. Initiatives came from a variety of sourees, either from the
peasants themselves, or local cadres, or from guided policy
Rural Economic Development 137
experiment from above. Politically the party and the central govern-
ment did not at first want to commit any risk which might touch off a
bigger political crisis within the party. Many party leaders at all levels
were ideologically frozen and stiff. They were incapable of evaluating,
through economic rationalism, what was wrong with rural economic
production and with the sad plight of rural living standards.
Ideological indoctrination had deprived most of the communist
leaders of innovative thinking. Political survival became the major
concern for most low level policy makers in China. No one can
completely undo the effects of Mao's ideological argument even
today. It was in such a fearful atmosphere that the dismantling of the
commune system took place in various parts of China. Some cadres
and peasants were bolder than their counterparts in other regions. On
the whole, even though most cadres knew the need for change, they did
not have the political courage to advocate it. Nor could they champion
the reform, on the other hand, which would inevitably reduce their
own authority as bureacratic leaders of the commune economy.
Provincialleaders of the party and the government might have wanted
central leadership to issue new policy directions. A few leaders,
however, were allowed to experiment quietly with the responsibility
system. The central government had to weigh the political conse-
quences of any contemplated commune reform. The moderate leaders
were waiting for more information about locally initiated experimen-
tal results. Only the farmers knew best that the commune land should
be privately contracted to them for more production if the government
would allow them to keep what is left after the delivery of a fixed quota
collection. This would encourage them to work hard in the field.
On the other hand, the commune reform over sideline production
was another way of encouraging peasants to produce more if they were
allowed to keep a large share of profit after fulfilment of the
contracted obligation to the commune. In short, reform at the levels of
the production team, the brigade and the commune itself was
necessary if production relations between the commune and the
production units could be arranged by contracts to profit both si des
through increased production. The following pages will describe so me
interesting accounts to illustrate the need for reform and the resulting
increase in production. 'The contracted responsibility system' has its
myriad varieties in both urban and rural production. During a
two-year period in rural China, 1979-81, agricultural productivity
increased by 18per cent. And farmers' per capita annual income
increased by 66 per cent. 16
138 China Under Deng Xiaoping
In three years (1979 to July 1982) some 70per cent of the rural
production teams had gone into the contract system. The main
reasons for this rapid transition was the desire of the peasants to work
for themselves, for more private profit, and the improvement of their
own living standards. The readjustment of production relationship
was essential for greater productivity. The leftists up to 1978 had failed
to understand the need for rural production incentives. For decades
under the leftists, the peasants had been resigned to depend on only
three things: 'Grain need depended on government's resale, liveli-
hood depended on government's welfare, and production depended
on government's credit lending.'17 The following incident led to
gradual but steady policy changes. During the planting season of the
Fall of 1978, Shan-nan district of Anhui Province suffered an
enormous drought, and the peasants themselves suddenly took
matters into their own hands. They divided up the commune land into
a 'family responsibility farming'. The higher authorities at the local,
district and provincial levels did not express either their approval or
disapproval. In March of the following year, 1979, the People's Daily
in Beijing was the first to criticise the event in an article. Local
authorities immediately decided to declare the farmers' action illegal
as so labeUed it in the People's Daily. However, the provincial party
secretary restrained the local authorities and instructed them to await
until after the spring harvest before deciding what to do, In 1979, the
spring and the fall harvests were enormously increased in volume. And
80 per cent of the farmers requested to continue the practice while, on
the other hand, the local party secretary had al ready ordered areturn
to the old commune practice. This party leader did so not because he
did not approve of what the farmers had done but he feared for his
own accountability to the higher party authority. Hemight be
condemned 'as a capitalist roader' if he remained silent. All his
subordinate cadres, however, supported the farmers against his
'perfunctory gesture of disapproval'. The farmers and the village level
cadres asked: 'Is increase in grain production a violation of law? Must
not test of truth be practiced in rural China? Why is this success in
grain production not allowed? Our nation still depends on grain
import. It embarrasses every Chinese. Why cannot we allow our own
production increase?' Farmers and low level cadres proudly advanced
their argument in this manner.
The middle level party leaders in Anhui had the same ideological
contradiction in their minds. They, too, asked: 'After twenty years of
rural work, we now produce less grain than before but still falsely claim
Rural Economic Development 139
our general policy and direction is correct. This new contradiction was
similar to an earlier precedent. When grain production was increased
in 1961 and 1961 Mr Mao said the policy was wrong. What kind of
theory is this?18 They further asked: 'What is capitalism? What is
socialism? Now everything is confused.' They both loved and feared
the new success of family farming responsibility. They loved it because
grain production doubled and peasant incentives multiplied. They
feared it because of their involvement in it: they might be possibly
accused of supporting new capitalists. Therefore, these cadres did not
offer their support in the transition. Nor did they dare draw a positive
conclusion from it. They thus did not take a clear-cut stand before
the peasants; they were simply waiting for instructions from the
higher echelons.
What is family farming responsibility? It is not giving away the
collective ownership of land, an im als and large farming equipment.
These all still remain collectively owned. The production team at first
acquired greater autonomy in decisions about production, but the
team did not gain the ownership of anything. In many cases the
production team has become the most important unit. It may give
points to the members who in turn, receive goods or cash according to
these points. As a result, each family, has more income while still
under collective ownership. The state now gains in larger purchase
quotas because of production increase. Consequently, the collectivity
accumulates more capital profit. Thus, the individual, the family, the
collectivity and the state can all benefit. The rural individual farmer
can seil his goods on the free market. This practice is of value for
everyone. It is a form of socialism; it is not a typical practice of
capitalism. This is, then, the first argument in favour of individual and
family responsibility farming. However, ideologically leftist cadres
consider the new practice a step backward in the socialist movement
without realising that it is two steps forward for the modernisation of
the country.
In 1980, a number of areas of Kansu province adopted the family
responsibility system in response to local popular desires. According
to an official investigation report, Kansu province for the thirty years
after 1949 did not make much progress at all in agricultural
production, especially in the dry drought-prone central part. Top soil
was blown away by dry wind. In remote areas and hilly regions of the
province, no progress had been made at all. Cultivation still depended
on draft animals. For example, in education some 65 per cent of the
people between the ages of sixteen and forty-five were in 1980 still
140 China Under Deng Xiaoping
illiterate. Thus many local cadres did not have the necessary ability to
manage collective production. Bookkeeping in most ofthe communes
was confusing. Some cadres often misused and misappropriated the
commune's money, while commune members suffered from starva-
tion. Too many of the cadres themselves often refused to work in the
field and became themselves a burden for the pe asants to feed and to
clothe. Up to 1978, pe asants in Kansu province received aper capita
annual income of 60yuan (ab out $US30 in 1980 exchange rate).
Thirty-five per cent of production team members received only 40
yuan. 19 When family responsibility farming came to Kansu, commune
members could directly manage their own production to avoid waste
and exploitation by privileged cadres who used to live much better at
the farmer's expense. Now the pe asants love the land they farm and
their draft animals they keep for work in the field. Production has risen
rapidly as has per capita income. With the increase in production
enthusiasm, interpersonal relations have improved between the
cadres who now work in the field themselves, and the farmers who now
have little to complain about. Most important of aIl, the policy today
is in accord with popular desire and working experience in the field.
Responsible farming is in short, the first step in rural modernisation
because of (1) dramatic production increases; (2) competition
between farmers and rural division of labour; (3) emergence of
specialisation in production and new job availability; (4) transition
from farming to other specialised non-agricultural occupations; (5)
new and greater voluntary cooperation among farmers in the future
for their own self-interest; (6) rural expansion in husbandry, auxiliary
occupations and sideline industries. And rural commerce will be
developed by the initiative of pe asants themselves with just a little or
no government assistance. Land will not be the only means of rural
prosperity. Light industry and specialised commerce will absorb much
rural manpower. Land redistribution in the future on a voluntary basis
in order to mechanise farming for more efficient production is entirely
possible and rational without coercion.
The contractual family responsibility system is a new system of
readjustment in rural management of the economy and production. It
affects not only 80 per cent of the total Chinese population living in the
countryside, but also the other 20 per cent of urban citizens who
depend on abundant labour and material supply from the countryside
to improve their lives. A complicated sequence of changes will result
from the reform and revival of rural production initiatives. This
peasant enthusiasm to work for the benefits of all as weIl as for their
Rural Economic Development 141
very start of Deng's reform, the 'model county' for emulation in 1979.
Why was this sueeess possible? Chairman Zhou spent days with me
explaining it. He was and still is totally involved in the eounty's
progress as he had been sinee 1949.
In 1949, Nanhai had an ineome of 100 million yuan. In 1979 the total
income was 810 million. As already eited, the 1984 total growth was 1870
million yuan. In the county's own statistical record, income inereased
by eight times in the thirty years between 1949 and 1979. Why was it
possible in the last five years for county ineome to inerease by 1070
million yuan? Chairman Zhou made the following summary. First,
enthusiastie exeeution of the eentral government's reform poliey of
'open the eountry up to foreign nations and revitalisation of domestie
eeonomie development'. Chairman Zhou unqualifiedly declared it the
only right poliey whieh is welcome to the people. This was a 'poliey to
make wealth'. As he said: 'Under the same sky, on the same land and
by the same people, the poliey has sueeeeded; but Mao's poliey failed.
To me the only valid answer is that this is a eorreet and welcome one,
Mao's poliey was ineorreet and without genuine support.' He said the
implementation strategy is also eorreet in terms of readjustment,
restrueturing, eonsolidating and improving. Such a strategy involves
no drastie departure or sudden change to benefit or hurt anyone. The
new poliey requires time to transform the eeonomy, to raise wages and
bonuses, to pump money into the eountryside and to allow the people
to adapt to new aims. The new poliey allows some people to prosper
sooner than others, but all will get there eventually. There is room for
all the people to improve their own personal lot if they live in rural
areas and wish to manage some sideline ineomes.
Seeondly, Chairman Zhou stated his seeond reason was that of sup-
port from the central and provineial governments. As early as Novem-
ber 1979 Beijing leadership declared 'In agrieulture, leam from Nan-
hai'. This declaration made his own leadership stronger and more
eonfident. It gave every eadre in 'the county more excited, more
dedieated push and made hirn eager to work extra hard to set the next
target of progress mueh higher and more ambitiously'. Well-known
leaders from Beijing eame to Nanhai to 'observe our progress, to
eneourage our people, to remove our fear of poliey reverse to make
themselves again the vietims of eondemnation. This pattern of
eneouragement was no different from Mao's declarations: 'In
agrieulture learn from Dachai' . The whole propaganda system and the
loealleadership then listened and followed. In the 1960s there was just
as mueh enthusiasm to learn from Daehai as in 1979 to learn from
150 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Nanhai. For Nanhai, however, the result was different. The people's
standard of living was improved instantly. On the other hand, the
provincial leaders did their utmost to support Nanhai's own progress.
Many came to Nanhai from Guangzhou. The governor, the first party
secretary and many others 'were behind us'.
Thirdly, 'the unity and cooperation among some twelve county
leadership units' were responsible locally for making the huge
economic progress possible. Chairman Zhou modestly omitted his
own leadership capacity in leading the county officers and cadres. The
people had to work day and night since 1979 at meetings, in the fields,
making plans, taking evaluations, plotting schemes and inventing new
methods in order to mobilise the peasants to believe and not to be
afraid. To become rich in the past was a violation of egalitarianism
wh ich would result in a person's being subjected to criticism of dass
struggle. No one wanted to commit that sin and to violate Mao's
ideology. After thirty years of communist rule people have learned to
share poverty in disgust, not healthy competition to become wealthy
even though they wish they could. It became the task of the county
leadership crew to convince the pe asants 'to work harder and to get
wealthy'. They must change now without fear.
How to campaign against peasant inertia of inaction or resistance?
The county leadership units worked hard to devise methods and
strategies to move the people for incentives to work. They held public
meetings and invited a few courageous people to report on how they
had been able to make more money and save more in their bank
account. The leaders went to production teams and brigades to tell the
people how to aquire greater income, how to think in terms of
becoming rich and 'why there is no limit to the growth of wealth'. They
created a variety of occasions in which to celebrate those who had
become wealthier. In 1979 the county leadership set the target of per
capita income from the average 100 yuan to 400 by the end of 1981.
This was a very difficult goal to attain. They worked daily to encourage
all teams and brigades to meet their separate group goal. A few devices
were employed to overcome the fear of becoming rich: (1) write 'a
letter to congratulate' those who have achieved more income; (2) 'use
astring offirecrackers to celebrate'; (3) give a free 'ticket to a movie';
(4) provide 'a head of pig for feast'; (5) deliver 'a case of wine'. This
was their method of encouraging production through their 'Five Ones'
policy. When such acelebration was in progress, pictures were taken.
The guests of honour often said: 'If the government accuses us of
becoming richer, these photos will be our evidence that you people in
Rural Economic Development 151
former citizens and their descendants living abroad. They have been
invited to return to their homeland to retire, to visit relatives, to seek
trade opportunities and to invest in local industries.
The result of such visits by Nanhai county officials abroad has paid
off handsomely. Many former inhabitants have returned to visit or to
invest. Former residents or descendants in Hong Kong have reversed
their political allegiance in National Day celebrations after 1980. They
have stopped hoisting the Nationalist Government flag on 10 October
every year. Nanhai's Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong has been
in active existence since 1910. Members of it have been eager to
contact their relatives in Nanhai. When Chairman Zhou hirnself
visited Hong Kong in 1980, they all wanted to see hirn personally. He
was kept busy for weeks meeting with them. Nanhai's total foreign
trade with Hong Kong annually accounts for more than 100 million
Hong Kong dollars. These overseas Nanhai descendants remit a large
portion of their foreign exchange to their relatives. They also donate
cash for welfare and education. Some 500,000 local citizens have
directly or indirectly been benefited by these new contacts with
relatives abroad. Nanhai now has its own foreign tourist industry.
My interview with Chairman Zhou covered other areas which have
broad similarities with other parts of China. For example, the
dismantling of commune economy, local government reorganisation,
education and technological developments, and other local problems
of nationwide significance occupied most of the remaining interview
time. I asked for his opinion on the development of democracy and
the rule of law in China. Chairman Zhou considers this as one of
the central parts of the reform under Deng in terms of long-term
implications. In conversation he demonstrated his total ignorance of
democratic freedoms and rights. He was unaware of local autonomy
and practice in democratic decision making, or of the importance of
political election with multiple candidates to choose from or of the
expression in public affairs or the freedom of the press. However, what
he avoided mentioning or did not know about non-communist practice
of political democracy was itself most important to me. I suddenly
realised with greater depth that no nation can practice any form of
democracy which is alien to itself and is not in demand by its citizens,
especially its rank and file political and administrative leaders.
Chairman Zhou is not just anybody else. He is a gentle, thoughtful,
experienced, and dedicated communist who is open-minded and
genuinely loved by most of Nanhai's citizens. I believe, that by
comparison, most of his counterparts elsewhere in the nation as
154 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Toward the end of our interview, I simply wanted to hear from hirn
'what will the majority of people want in the next ten or fifteen
years?' Chairman Zhou's answer emphasised familiar issues. How-
ever, he daimed to speak from the common people's point of view.
'Energy supply, transportation and education are important to the
average person in China, today and in the next fifteen years.' 'People
do not have energy to cook food in the kitchen.' Coal, wood and
electricity are in very short supply for daily use by the people. He cited
popular complaints: 'Under the Kuomintang government before 1949
we had fuel but no rice to cook; under the communist government
since 1949 we had rice but no fuel to cook.' He explained that, during
the cultural revolution, the 'rebel slogan was to open up the mountains
to make rice field because rice production was the key policy'. Since
Deng, the key policy emphasis is to dose the mountains to make forest
because reafforestation is indispensable for energy and raw material
supply.' On education, he said 92per cent of Nanhai's primary
school-age children are in school today. The county is rushing to build
more schools for students of junior high school which is now
compulsory. Senior high school education, polytechnic occupational
education and university opportunities are extremely limited every-
where, especially in remote and border regions of the country. Nanhai
is one of the best places for educational opportunities. A grave crisis,
however, has been 'teacher shortage everywhere'. During the cultural
revolution, Mao simply dosed schools at all levels for many years,
Nanhai county is rich. It has been able to build thirty-three new junior
high schools. The entrance examinations for senior high school and
university are too difficult to pass. No more than a dozen or so lucky
candidates out of one hundred are admitted into good universities and
colleges. The other top 20 per cent find other post-high school
training opportunities for jobs. The rest are wasted annually.
Qualified professors are also in short supply everywhere. The people
today are fond of comparing educational opportunities before and
after 1949. He said, that before 1949 'there were books and schools,
but parents did not have the money; now parents have the money but
there are no books and no schools'. Nanhai county has only four senior
high schools for 33 per cent of the senior school age. One of the crisis
158 China Under Deng Xiaoping
5.4 CONCLUSION
161
162 China Under Deng Xiaoping
In the socialist state, politics and economics are much more combined
into an integrated whole. Polities and policy from the political arena
dominate the economic development not through the science of
economics but through the dogma of Karl Marx, Engels and Lenin.
Records show that all communist states are doing poorly in terms of
economie growth as compared with non-communist states. Political
economy in the communist world has an entirely different emphasis,
such as the theory of class exploitation. Thus the operational,
organisational and structural aspects of the economy are sacrifieed to
the ideological pre-eminence. As a result, political rulers remain
powerful as decision makers and the citizens are powerless victims
without opportunities to take initiatives to maximise their own private
income potential. Thus, the Soviet economic model has failed in
Russia, East Europe, North Korea and in a few other socialist states as
weil. In the capitalist countries, greater productivity does bring about
a greater enjoyment of material life by all citizens who bave a far
higher standard of living than citizens in most of the socialist states.
Politicians, and policy makers in capitalist states are much less able to
dominate production and competition among the common citizens,
who are also able to reduce economic inequalities. China has learned
about economic wastefulness and the disadvantages of the Soviet model
of socialism. It has learned also from its Russian big brother the painful
experience of Soviet economic aid cut off in 1960 and the withdrawal of
the 1000 technicians, aid materials and project blueprints. In short, as
a loyal socialist member in the Soviet orbit, China paid dearly since
1949, especially in its sacrifices during the Korean War years. Chinese
leaders found, to their surprise, the Soviet leadership never intended
to treat China either as an equal partner or with trust and confidence.
This fact led to mutual distrust between the two nations in the late
1950s and was a critical factor in Mao's radieal economic policy. Mao
was a restless leader, eager for quick results. Moderate and more
rational colleagues failed to restrain him from his radiealleftist polieies
because they, too, were shocked by their treatment at the Soviet
hands, whether under Stalin or Khrushchev. These reasons were part
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 165
A defence industry was built up from nothing. Many new in dust ries
were built in China's hinterland which accounted for 36 per cent of the
annual industrial output. In agriculture, large-scale irrigation projects
were undertaken to make possible 20 million more hectares of land
under irrigation. Flood control measures were undertaken to improve
waterflow in the Yangtze River, Yellow River, Huaihe, and the Pearl
River regions. Grain output by 1980 reached approximately 318
million tons which almost doubled the production figure in 1952. In
rural China, the means of production were drastically improved as
shown in Table 6.2. 6
Although the nation's population nearly doubled between 1949 and
1982, China is today able to feed and dothe its people. The progress
in education and road construction in rural China must be counted as a
major achievement to overcome so me physical isolation in the
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 167
ment allocation. China after 1949 never placed people above heavy
industry and capital construction.
Secondly, a new policy of faster growth of agriculture and light
industry has increased and enriched the supply of consumption in rural
life. This was areversal ofthe practice ofthe previous thirty years. The
implementation measures were: (1) ensuring the policy independence
of rural communes, production brigades and teams in their production
decisions through a system of contractual obligations and for long-term
contract duration; (2) diversification of production specialization and
sideline production through encouragement for rural free market
commercial exchange; (3) subsidies for rural sideline production
through price supports. These policies induced more peasant enthusiasm
to produce for their own assured greater income, for example, grain
production reached an all time high of over 332 million tons in 1979.
Even terrible floods and droughts in both north and south China did not
prevent grain production from reaching approximately 318 million
tons, in 1980, the second highest since 1949. Gross agricultural output
value was augmented by an average of5.5 per cent in 1979-81. The same
high rate of growth was true for cotton, oil-bearing crops, forestry,
animal husbandry and fishery. Light industry received in the 1979-81
period larger sums of government loans for expansion. For the first time
since 1949, light industry grew faster than heavy industry. Thus, market
commodity supplies s\,lddenly increased. Annual retail sales rose by
several times in 1979, greater than for any single previous years and
more than the entire decade of 196Os. The growth rate of heavy industry
was purposely reduced through control of resource allocations. A
comparison between light and heavy industry is shown in Table 6.4. 8
Ouring 1979-80, because policy emphasis was on improving the living
condition, tax exemptions and financial subsidies reduced government
revenues. Oue to practical difficulties involved in reducing capital
170 China Under Deng Xiaoping
value of 25 per cent and 120 per cent profits and turned over to the
state 100 per cent more profits. Upon further analysis, in 5422
enterprises which participated in the experiments, decision-making
decentralisation did not have a significant impact on production. 12
Another experiment in enterprise production and profit making was
tried in 1980 in Shanghai, Sichuan and Guangxi. This time the
experiment was on the introduction of income tax to replace profit to
be delivered to the government. The enterprise was made solely
responsible for either profits or losses. The State Economic Commis-
sion asked every province to select an enterprise to experiment in 1980
with the new tax appproach in place ofprofits. In total, 191 enterprises
throughout the country participated in this experiment. Toward the
end ofthe year, the State Council issued 'ten provisional' regulations
to promote and protect socialist competition throughout the nation
against local barriers. In short, urban economic reform had five years
of quiet experiment throughout the country before its official
inauguration in October 1984.
Among recent reform experiments has been the government's effort
to recreate an individual economy of craftsmanship, for example. As it
may be recalled, the government in 1955 compelled all peddlers, small
shop owners and craftsmen to join cooperatives. More that 96 per cent
of them did, that is except those in far remote areas of the country. In
1962 there were still 2 million individual handicraft people and
traders within the cooperatives. By 1978, only 150,000 were left.
However, between 1978 and 1980, under a new policy of rehabilitation
and expansion, the number grew to 810,000 in 1980. More jobs and
competition will probably develop as the individual economy is
encouraged by the state. In short, competition and growth are related
closely to the expansion of the free market. The reform policy is using
the market mechanism as an auxiliary regulator of the economy which
is basically controlled by state planners. Today in China consumer
goods through market channels, as opposed to those handled by the
government, account for 20 per cent of industrial production and 25
per cent of total retail sales. One-third of total rural produce is being
purchased by the government. The prospect appears that more a
market-oriented economy in China is most likely. Rural population
will revolve around this free sector of the economy.
Proper handling of the relations between government planning and
market mechanisms will always be crucial to managerial reform. The
free market as a supplementary regulator of the socialist economy has
alerted experts to call for 'four different forms of management'. They
174 China Under Deng Xiaoping
are :13
1966 1976
Total national income: 100 100
Industry 38.2 43.3
Agriculture 43.6 41.0
Building 3.7 4.9
Transport 4.2 3.8
Commerce 10.3 7.0
Proportion in net industrial output values:
Light industry 47.2 40.4
Heavy industry 52.8 59.6
in 1979 and had cost an amount of $US 824 million by 1983. In the
Shekou industrial area of Shenzhen, transportation, electricity supply,
water system, postal and telecommunications have been more fully
completed (the industrial sector of Shekou is only 1.3 square
kilometres). A larger area of 20 square kilometres, in addition to the
presently used 17.4 square kilometres, is being rapidly developed as
the site of a future industrial-commercial complex. Chinese industrial
and construction workers in Shenzhen's development today are the
best prepared or trained human resources. The city of Shenzhen
(which is adjacent to the Shenzhen economictone) itselfhas a working
force of 100,000. The other 100,000 selected workers came from other
parts of the country. These 200,000 construction people have
generally completed their high school education. In addition, they
now receive on-the-job training for occupational specialisation
provided by various factories themselves. For technologically advan-
ced future development in human resources, the central government
in Beijing approved in 1982 the establishment of Shenzhen Univer-
sity which is totally financed by Shenzhen itself, and is providing
students with a Western curriculum in content and in depth (of which
more will be said later). The university promotes basic research in
Shenzhen's future technological development. Another major under-
taking is the construction of a nuclear power station to supply a fully
expected future industrial-commercial use.
Both the land and the water transportation systems between
Shenzhen and the rest of the country, and the world at large, are being
improved. The special zone will be fully linked with the national
network of railroads and highways. Future harbour development for
world trade and for Nanhai oil exploration is also under way. Presently
3000-tonnage ships are navigating between Hong Kong and Shekou.
Future harbours are planned to handle 10,000 and 100,000 tonnage of
ships for an annual total weight of 20 million tonnage of business.
This will be especially useful to oil refining for crude oil from the South
China sea. The Shenzhen Navigation Company is presently in charge
of water transport with most major cities reachable by water in heavy
tonnage.
It has been just four years since the experiments began in 1981.
Shenzhen has become an attractive centre to people of many interests:
tourists, merchants, industrialists, academic experts, China specialists
and economists in particular. They have come to Shenzhen from all
over the world to learn about recent Chinese economic development
through the example of Shenzhen. For example, for economic
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 179
cial and residential, thirty to sixty years; tourist, sixty to one hundred
years, and agricultural-dairy subject to contract negotiation. Those
enterprises having ente red contracts on land use prior to 1985 have
built into their contracts a reduction of fee in land use by a percentage
rate of 30 to 50 because of previous inadequate development in land
quality or incompleteness in land development itself. Those enter-
prises having undeveloped land, or slope, hills, or swamp areas, may
receive a fee reduction between one to five years at the initial stage.
However, the land usage fee is subject to readjustment every three
years to future users. Such fee readjustment each time will not be more
than 30 per cent of the existing amount. For investment in the fields
of education, cultural affairs, science-technology, medicine-health
and other social welfare , fees for land use will be substantially reduced.
Any investment in the most advanced technology and in non-profit-
making fields will pay no fees for land use.
On the control of foreign exchange, all foreign enterprises must
open their accounts with the Bank of China in the special zone or with
such other foreign banks as are approved and certified to do business
by the Chinese authorities. Foreign investors and businessmen,
workers or Chinese from Hong Kong and Macao may remit their
properly earned profits after having paid their income taxes. Such
remittances must be handled by the Bank of China or such other
designated foreign banks in the special zone. Foreign enterprises
seeking terminations of their business before normal expiration of the
contracted period may transfer their capital to other companies, or
remit it abroad after having applied for termination as regulated after
they have paid all financial debts.
On sales of products manufactured in the special zone, Chinese law
requires that such products be exported unless otherwise entered into
the contract in advance. If such manufactured articles are those which
China imports, they are permitted to enter the Chinese domestic market
on a fixed ratio as determined by domestic demands. On the whole, in
any dispute or misunderstanding arising from the contract in a joint
venture between the guest investor and the Chinese investor, both
si des may negotiate for solution on the basis of equality and mutual
benefit. After failing to do so, such disputes may then be submitted to
the Chinese arbitration authority for mediation and arbitration. And
finally, for the convenience of entry to and exit from Shenzhen Special
zone by all foreign investors and those having residence in Shenzhen as
merchants or alien residents, the Shenzhen authority provides them
with special permits issued by Shenzhen Special Economic Zone
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 181
of 9200 million Hong Kong dollars. The company itself has been
divided into thirty-three specialised branches to pursue their separate
division of labour. It will likely sub-divide into more functional speci-
alisations according to future demands, as Mr Chen told me du ring
my interview with hirn on 14 July 1985. For example, some of its branch
companies are doing the following: (1) to manage real-estate services
together with guest investors to build 100 or more offices or residential
buildings of no less than eighteen stories high and several hundreds
of luxurious villas; (2) to develop and manage Wen Jin Du Industrial
district and Houhai Bay New District's cultural and residential area
and to prepare to create an Asian university in this new district; (3) to
improve and develop into a new commercial and tourist city, the old
city of Huacheng with Chinese cultural-national characteristics; (4) to
develop and manage Futian New Town of thirty square kilometres in
size; (5) to develop a cement enterprise through a joint venture with
Japanese investors to reach 200,000 tons of annual production in
cement; (6) to develop and manage Honey Lake Holiday Resort; (7)
to develop a science and technology exchange centre, and (8) such
other developments for a total of some thirty-three projects under
thirty-three subsidiary companies of Shenzhen Special Economic
Zone Development Company.15 In short, this special zone develop-
me nt company is the official vehicle for both the Guangdong
Provincial Government and the Beijing Government for devising,
developing and coordinating many services in competition with other
non-official companies. The creation of so me thirty-three subsidiary
companies is clearly for the purpose of avoiding a mushrooming
growth of the head company bureaucracy. As subunits, each branch
company is competitively responsible for its own separate finance and
accountability. Many of the Beijing Government policy guidelines are
transmitted directly or indirectly through the head office of this giant
semi-independent company. The company itself is producing many
advance technology-intensive articles, such as orbital satellite ground
television reception equipment and micro-computers. Together with
the expansion of South China Sea oil exploration, Shenzhen is
becoming one of the future oil refining and distributing centres.
Petrochernical industrial development will be another potential area for
development. At present, to invest in Shenzhen requires following
certain steps in contract negotiation as folIows: (1) all prospective
foreign investors must contact and discuss with the foreign investment
negotiation department or its branch offices in Hong Kong or the
Hong Kong office of Shekou Industrial Zone. Prospective foreign
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 183
known as SKIZ). This bold action ofboth CMSN and the State Council
opened up a new chapter in CMSN's history . During the last six busy
years, CMSN has brought to SKIZ advanced technology, foreign
capital, and management experience from Hong Kong, Macao and
foreign states. Shekou is a small industrial port. It has completed its first
stage of development. Its total area is 10 square kilometres, of which
half is now usable land. SKIZ is administered by CMSN, which has
converted a 'desolate beach and barren hills' into a small city-port. As
a matter of fact, SKIZ is only one of many subsidiary operations and
sub-companies buHt up in recent years by CMSN which has a total
capital amounting to 8 billion Hong Kong dollars. Although it is a
government agency under the Ministry of Communication with its
board of directors sitting in Beijing, CMSN is operating out of its
Hong Kong head office relatively free of any interference from the
central government. Its business expertise is far advanced and beyond
the government's ability to participate effectively or constructively. In
the development of SKIZ, CMSN has been able to bring to Shekou
many foreign investors in a variety of fields through its Planning and
Development Division. Thus SKIZ's success under CMSN is a source
of Chinese pride. This success has brought Deng Xiaoping (1984),
Hu Yaobang (1983), Zhao Ziyang (1981) and Yi Jianying (1980) to
SKIZ to observe its progress.
In July 1984, the People's Guangdong Provincial Government
ratified a plan to establish the Administrative Bureau of Shekou
District. Although legally under the Shenzhen People's Government,
the Bureau exercises its functions quite autonomously as a local
administrative body in charge of SKIZ, Chiwan Bay and Shekou town
for a total land area of 14 square kilometres. The Shenzhen People's
Government has relinquished a large number of its rights to the
Shekou bureau, including those relating to the ratification of
investment agreements and contracts, import of materials, application
for household registration by aliens and by overseas Chinese, and the
right to set up its own public security, tax units and postal services.
Under the Administration Committee, SKIZ is governed directly by
many subunits as functional service branches. SKIZ also has a Nanhai
Oil Service office to act as a liaison organ to provide logistic services
for oil exploration in the South China Sea and to 'render consulting
service to oil companies and contractors'. Like Shenzhen Special
Zone, SKIZ has a large volume of joint ventures and sole foreign
investment ventures, or other cooperative enterprises. Forty-five per
cent of the joint ventures involve investment of 21 per cent from the
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 185
United States, 17 per cent from Thailand, 6 per cent from Japan, 5.4
per cent from West Europe and 4 per cent from Singapore. The
categories of investment are as folIows: 17 industry 77.5 per cent, real
estate and construction 10 per cent, commerce and service 8.2 per
cent, tourism 2.2 per cent and communication and transport 1.6 per
cent.
SKIZ had a population of 12,000 in 1985 and is projected to re ach
100,000 in the year 1990. Its future seems closely related to the
development of transport of the Pearl River Delta and South China
Sea oil resources. Since 1983, China National Off-shore Oil Corpora-
tion has concluded eighteen contracts with foreign oil companies, of
which twelve are related to the Shekou basin. The second feature of
Shekou is its emphasis on industrial production as opposed to the
multiplicity of investments in Shezhen or Chuhai. 18 The third feature
about Shekou is the fact that it is developed by a Chinese company
without any sharing of authority with other domestic or foreign
agencies, unlike the situation in Shezhen. It is quite possible that
Shekou will always be more efficient in management and easily
adaptable to domestic and international market realities or changes.
The economic and managerial resources and experience of CMSN is
totally behind the development in Shekou, in competition with other
economic zones, which are larger but less efficient.
6.7 SPECIALZONESBENEFITBOTHCHINAAND
FOREIGN INVESTORS
Many questions can be raised about this new venture which began in
1981. In fact, this scheme to stabilise long-term economic relations
between a socialist nation and aB or any capitalist investors has never
been attempted before by a socialist state. Why does China have to
choose this path? Is this a stop-gap approach or a serious experiment
on China's part? What will be the political effects if it faiIs? How weIl
have the experiments been accepted by the leftist elements in the
Communist Party? How can one reIate this experiment to democrat-
isation in China and the government's goal to quadrupie the national
income by the year 2oo0? Special zone experiments conform to
Deng's two revolutionary goals: (1) to keep China open to the outside
worId, and (2) to revitalise the economy. The commitment to these
twin goals since 1979 has been so strong and so weIl accepted that it
seems impossible for any future leadership to abandon it without
unpredictable consequences. Even if set backs and corruptions should
occur in the special zones, they would not be likely to reverse China's
policy to remain open to the outside worid. On the other hand, foreign
investors have made their long-term investment decisions when they
came to invest here. They will not be able to withdraw easily under any
adverse changes in Chinese politics. After a eIoser observation of this
economic experiment the special zones can be related to four
long-term benefits: (1) foreign investment security and guaranteed
profits; (2) assurance in foreign capital retrieval; (3) gateway to
technology and capital inflow; and (4) internal need for continuity.
These four 'preliminary observations' are based on a long-term
Urban Economic Reform and the Case of Shenzhen 191
tax or reduces it by 50 per cent if a joint venture starts with a pledge 'to
operate for aperiod of ten years or more'. In such a case, the
enterprise must apply for its tax exemption or its 50 per cent deduction
for the first three years. If investment is made in a low profit region, it
may gain an additional tax deduction by 15 to 30 per cent for aperiod
of ten years after the first three years of tax exemption. 26 These are
enough examples to illustrate how China is eager to have joint
ventures with foreign investment partners even if their share is only
25 per cent, with their taxes being reduced or exempted. In short, due
to its interest in acquiring advanced technology and in exporting
manufactured goods, China has established this unique special
economic zone to benefit both sides fairly. Investment security and
guaranteed profits are assured both in the existing law and also by
contracts.
Investment laws clearly speIl out the retrieval procedure from China of
the original capital, profits made from such investment, and the wages
of foreign staff members and workers. All of these incomes can be
remitted from China as described by the laws. The best details in each
case come technically from the contract itself of each joint venture,
wh ich can include any conditions for details du ring the negotiation.
The Chinese tax system is cIearly designed to induce foreign investors
to reinvest their net profits in more profitable new ventures. For
Ion ger periods of investment commitment, more tax benefit is still
available. In short, China is prepared to tie down capital forces as long
as it can. If such a successful trend continues, foreign capital,
equipment, and national gross income will increase with accelerating
speed. Domestic employment, internal market development, foreign
trade expansion and new technological gains will be such that China
will eventually be deeply dependent on international economic
networks and trade transactions. On the other hand, without such
unique special economic zones and investment tax benefits under
law, foreigners will not be so easily attracted to China, and her
four modernisations will not be able confidently to count on such
foreign participation. Given all these factors and their critical conse-
quences, it is easy to appreciate why China is institutionalising in the
direction of a long-term opening up of the country to the outside
world. To provide strong confidence to foreign investors, China must
allow easy retrieval of capital from the country by any investor.
194 China Under Deng Xiaoping
From a barren village island in 1842 to the 1980s Hong Kong has never
been fully separated from China. It is almost entirely populated by the
Chinese. Of its 5.5 million population 98 per cent are Chinese,
196
'One Country, Two Systems' 197
induding since 1898 that of the leased New Territories. It has a total of
5075 square kilometres. It is the most urbanised city adjacent to China
proper. The majority ofpeople speak both Cantonese and English.lts
economy is modern, with some 75 per cent in industrial production and
24 per cent in tertiary service. Without a rural countryside for
agriculture and natural resource supplies, Hong Kong depends totally
on China as its hinterland for raw materials and as its market. Most of
the citizens in Hong Kong have dose relatives in Guangdong Province.
In 1949 when the Chinese Communist Party took over the mainland,
Hong Kong had a sm all population of less than half a million. Over the
last thirty years, refugees from China have aided in its rapid population
growth. Security border control has remained tight against the inflow of
refugees by both water and by land. Cheap labour supply from refugees
has been the major cause of rapid light industrial growth and
commercial expansion. It is, however, necessary to prevent illegal entry
of new refugees to protect the high standard of living. The economy is
heavily dependent on foreign markets, investment, and tourism.
Oue to its geographie propinquity and lack of resouces, Hong Kong is
inseparable from the PRC. Water, meat, vegetables and food grains are
all imported from China. The major reason for Hong Kong's prosperity
is primarily attributable to its colonial status under the British. The
British authority in Hong Kong, like Burma on China's southwestern
border , has maintained a friendly neutrality toward a politically chaotic
country over the last several decades. The PRC, for its part, has been
too weak to take over Hong Kong militarily. It could not abrogate the
treaties of 1842, which formally ceded the Island of Hong Kong to the
British. In 1860 the Kowloon peninsula was also ceded to the British
after the Anglo-French War of 1860. The New Territories, wh ich is the
largest segment of the three, was rented to the British in 1898 for a
period of ninety-nine years. Together, these three treaties constituted
the basis for the British to make Hong Kong into adependent colony
free of Chinese intervention. However, the PRC government since
1949 has maintained a position of not legally recognising the validity of
these treaties which were unilaterally imposed on China by the use of
force. The Beijing regime has always made dear that in due course it
would take proper measures to recover all Chinese territories taken by
force by foreign imperialism du ring the nineteenth century, including
those lost to Tsarist Russia.
What has made Hong Kong prosperity tenable was the anti-Com-
munist sentiment among the millions of refugees from China and other
local Chinese who do not wish to lose their free commercial society with
198 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Beijing was eager to discuss the future of Hong Kong. For example,
Premier Zhao Ziyang announced on 6 January 1982, that China
would respect Hong Kong's status as a free port and a weIl recognised
centre for international commerce in spite of China's future sovereign-
ty over the colony. He urged others not to draw any damaging
conclusions that might affect Hong Kong's economic prosperity while
Sino-British negotiation were still underway. Three months later,
Deng reaffirmed the applicability to Hong Kong of the conditions for
Taiwan's unification in his meeting with British former Prime Minister
Edward Heath on 6 April 1982. Heath later revealed the possibility of
a 'government by Hong Kong residents themselves' as a special
administrative region (hereafter, SAR). This approach was to be
arranged through the PRC constitution. Everything in Hong Kong
should remain unchanged, including local passports for travel abroad.
Up to April 1982, the 5.5 million residents had not had any formal or
informal contacts with the Beijing government regarding their own
views about the future transfer of sovereignty. The Chinese stand
appeared firm and consistent.
Repeatedly, reaffirmation of future conditions was made to Hong
Kong officials and citizens as they came to Beijing. For example, Deng
in April received President L. S. Huang of Hong Kong University and
twelve other notable local residents from Hong Kong and Macao on
their views of the future. Article 31 of PRC's 1982 draft constitu-
tion provided the way to introduce the establishment of SAR for both
Taiwan and Hong Kong. On the British side, officially guarded opt-
imism was detectable by the middle of 1982 when the late Sir Edward
Youde, Governor of Hong Kong, described at London Airport the fu-
ture transfer of sovereignty as a 'routine matter'. 2 Members of the
British Parliament began to recognise the government's responsibil-
ity to negotiate an acceptable agreement for the people of Hong Kong.
Everything remained secret regarding other obstacles to be resolved
through negotiation. On 22 September 1982, British Prime
Minister Margaret Thatcher arrived in Beijing. At the welcome
banquet, Premier Zhao Ziyang voiced the need to discuss long-term
future mutual interests between Britain and China after the transfer of
Hong Kong. He eagerly cited China's much quoted five principles of
peaceful coexistence as a basis for friendship among states. The next
day Zhao expressed to Hong Kong correspondents China's determina-
tion to regain sovereignty and to guarantee prosperity in Hong Kong.
In the critical meeting between Prime Minister Thatcher and Deng
Xiaoping, they each stated their separate stands and principles
'One Country, Two Systems' 201
1. There is a need for clear and firm stipulation through the PRC
constitution on a set of special administrative laws which should
204 China Under Deng Xiaoping
prohibit any change within several decades after 1997. This would
remove the fear for the local residents of future administrative
discretion which may cause uncertainties;
2. To protect Hong Kong's capitalist economy and its free port
status, the Communist Party should declare publicly that party
organs will not participate in the SAR administration and no
municipal communist secretariat will be established in Hong
Kong;
3. The Communist Party should declare that its 'four cardinal
principles' (Marxism-Maoism, the socialist path, Communist
Party leadership, and democratic dictatorship ) are not applicable
to Hong Kong;
4. Hong Kong's own modernised educational system, professional
people and their social status and high personal income must not
be downgraded in order to keep such modernity replenished for
good performance;
5. Local customs and practices must be respected;
6. Residents of Hong Kong should continue to enjoy rights to travel
abroad, to emigrate and study abroad. The PRC government
should negotiate with other governments to maintain free port
privileges for Hong Kong;
7. The Beijing government should declare a general policy toward
residents from Taiwan about their rights, press and publication
freedoms, and other enterprises so long as they do not carry out
'two China' activities, or violate Hong Kong's laws and public
security, or use Hong Kong to carry out underground counter-
revolutionary activities. They should come and go freely and carry
out their activities openly;
8. TheBritish system oflaws should remain in practice after 1997 and
recognition and protection of all legal contracts and obligations
and interests made legally before 1997 should be maintained;
9. Hong Kong's foreign exchange should remain uncontrolled;
favourable balance of payments should be kept in Hong Kong and
not be reported to Beijing. Hong Kong should have no obligation
to purchase PRC bonds and treasury certificates. This policy
concerns the protection of local prosperity. (Britain only requires
Hong Kong to reimburse it for the expenditure incurred from
defence protection); and
10. Unless in a war emergency, Chinese military forces should not be
dispatched to Hong Kong. With prior consent of the PRC
government, Hong Kong should be able to welcome friendly visits
'One Country, Two Systems' 205
by foreign warships.
Mirrow Monthly emphatically declared that if the PRC can practice
these ten policies, the 'crisis of confidence' would be likely to
disappear for the people.
If this ten-point recommendation can, in fact, be put into practice
after 1997, Deng Xiaoping's doctrine of 'one country, two systems' will
truly be revolutionary. It seems that the Joint Declaration of 1984 can
accommodate all these points except the dispatch of Chinese troops.
When the British government gave up the sovereignty argument,
the second round of negotiation quickly convened in Beijing in July
1983. Negotiation moved forward smoothly. The Joint Declaration
was consummated on 26 September 1984. It is a good document and
weil received everywhere, including Western Europe, Japan and
the United States. The government of the Republic of China on
Taiwan denounced the Declaration as invalid and not binding. The
Declaration consists of PRC requirements; it feit the 'so-called
appropriate future time had come' for China not to reject its own
territory. The deadline for transfer from the British to the PRC is 1
July 1997. All of British Hong Kong, with a total area of 404 square
miles, will be returned. China could not just take back the New
Territories without also taking over the Hong Kong Island and lower
Kowloon, nor could domestic politics in China allow this logical
inconsistency. On the other hand, the British government could not
administer Hong Kong under Chinese sovereignty without full control
of the New Territories. Thus, the PRC government accepted
favourable opportunities for future British trade and investment in
China and a special guest role to assist Hong Kong after 1997. China
has secured long-term cooperation for, perhaps, the entire fifty years
which the Joint Declaration has granted to Hong Kong as a special
administrative region of China.
The major stipulations of the Declaration appear to be satisfactory
to the residents of Hong Kong, many of whom had established in
1983-4 a high degree of mutual understanding with the Beijing
government. Many Hong Kong delegations, personal visits to the PRC
and official statements by the Chinese government were made in 1983
and 1984 be fore the real negotiation began in July 1983. The Chinese
government meanwhile bought properties and opened business firms
in Hong Kong. It acted to stimulate and restore activities of the local
stock market. The Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, across the
border from Hong Kong, received large investments from Hong Kong
businessmen. Gradually but steadily, the Hong Kong residents
206 China Under Deng Xiaoping
of China's professed aim to make Hong Kong 'A Show Model' cannot
be doubted. From the PRC point of view, any failure to win the
confidence of resident citizens in Hong Kong will have a disastrous
result for her attempt to unite with Taiwan.
It has been four and a half years since the consummation of the Joint
Declaration. Hong Kong proves to be achallenge to the British to
implement and interpret the Declaration up to 1997 to prepare for the
reversion. To discharge Britain's self-imposed moral obligation to the
residents of five and a half million is not easy. They are divided among
themselves in interests and in expectations. The next ni ne years of
British effort is to be made under watchful scrutiny of the PRC
agencies and personnel already in Hong Kong. So far all things seem to
remain rosy for all concerned. Hong Kong has an open and free press
and freedom of speech to guide the development and to facilitate the
exchange of ideas. The local residents are likely to support the British
authority to accomplish as much as it can before 1997, while all will
look beyond 1997 with reservations.
The PRC has begun to work on the drafting of the basic law and on
the organisation of the advisory group to voice their opinions and
recommendations from the local residents. For the next four years this
task itself will not be easy. Theresidents, as groups of divergent or
conflicting interests, may have difficulties cooperating easily. Each
group or dass wants to have a basic law that can best guarantee its
future interests. All will look for assurance and safe devices to protect
future autonomy. The PRC government, on the other hand, is not
willing to see too many changes occur before and after 1997. However,
Beijing wants to expand its influence among the population now in
order to be able to steer future development to its own liking. Thus,
the challenge of the implementation of the Dedaration will increase in
its momentum as 1997 approaches.
A different challenge of implementation will come after the
reversion in 1997. This is when self-government begins. The Beijing
government will exercise supervision over the execution of the
Declaration and the basic law. There will be no 'buffer authority' when
the British administration disappears to prevent direct conflicts,
should any arise between the local autonomous regime and the PRC
authority. Hong Kong has been a very different society in itself. Its
social, cultural, economic and political realities manifest essentially
'One Country, Two Systems' 209
1. The British government has taken its part quite seriously in its new
annual undertaking. The government agrees 'to produce an annual
report on Hong Kong for presentation to Parliament between now
and 1997'.6 Community leaders in Hong Kong 'reacted favourably
to the move of keeping the UK up to date on Hong Kong';
2. The British government has worked to provide new passport
privileges to residents of Hong Kong as British Nationals
(overseas) without requiring the carrier to produce an identity
card. Discussions on the matter with the Chinese authorities have
been under way since 1985;
3. To continue trade expansion since the Joint Declaration, financial
cooperation between the Bank of China in Hong Kong and local
banking committee has become close. Hong Kong's membership in
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATI) after 1997 is
getting support for its continuation from many trade partners;
4. Since January 1985, the new British political adviser has been
building contacts to implement the Sino-British Agreement on the
future of Hong Kong. His role involves contacts and cooperation
with the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, the Guangzhou
provincial authority and the Chinese Xinhua News Agency in Hong
Kong. The late Governor Sir Edward Youde said: 'not much hard
work will have to be done in implementing the Sino-British
Agreement on the future of Hong Kong; preparatory work has
al ready begun,7 For example, in the field of legal reform, some 300
multilateral treaties and agreements and 160 bilateral agreements
that apply to Hong Kong have been gathered together for review by
the Hong Kong Attorney General's office in order to clarify Hong
Kong's rights or obligations under such existing agreements. The
study result will be turned over to the future Joint Liaison Group
which has the task of reviewing and deciding which and how each
agreement can best serve Hong Kong's interests after 1997;
5. A significant step was taken to hold elections for the Legislative
Council on 26 September 1985 in furthering the development of
representative government. The elected twenty-four seats for the
first time has joined the twenty-two nominated members and ten
'One Country, Two Systems' 211
7.2 THETAIWANTANGLE
Ever since the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950, Taiwan's legal
status and political position have emerged to complicate the Cold War
216 China Under Deng Xiaoping
eonfliet in Asia and in the United Nations. Mueh of the eonfliet has
resulted from ehanges in the United States toward the two govern-
ments of China. The position of the United States toward Taiwan has
affeeted the policies and diplomatie dynamies of many Asian states,
including Japan. Other than eommereial and eultural relations with
the Republie of China (hereafter ROq, most nations in reeent years
have terminated their formal diplomatie reeognition of the ROC.
There are eurrently twenty-two states with embassies in Taiwan.
However, the United States alone is more deeply involved in Taiwan's
seeurity and defenee even without formal diplomatie relations. Given
its regional defenee leadership in the superpower eontest and in her
direet relations with the PRC, poliey options for the United States are
very limited at the present time. It may be helpful to highlight the
reeent developments over the status evolution of Taiwan before the
diseussions of the PRC overtures of peaeeful unifieation, Taiwan's
internal politieo-eeonomie transformation and the ehallenge of its
independenee movement.
under General Chase came to re-arm and train the Nationalist troops.
In 1954, a mutual defence treaty was signed between Washington and
Taiwan. The United States began thus to insist diplomatically in the
Uni ted Nations that the ROC was the only legal government of all
China. The PRC, for the next 20 years could not receive a two-thirds
majority of votes in the United Nations to be admitted to that body.
The frozen attitude of the UN towards the PRC had worsened the
relations for all Asian states. Suddenly again the Uni ted States under
President Richard M. Nixon decided on secret talks with Beijing to
change the US policy. Still the Taiwan tangle remained one of the most
difficult issues in the US policy and in international politics. Much of
this has remained from the superpower conflicts.
What is at the heart of the Taiwan tangle? How complicated has the
crisis been in both domestic and international dimensions? Because of
lack of space, only a few aspects will be discussed below.
When President Truman decided to defend Taiwan in 1950, he also
unjustifiably raised a question over Taiwan's sovereignty or legal
status. One of his arguments was that Taiwan's position had not been
c1early defined at the Cairo Conference. It was decided only that Japan
would relinquish Taiwan without specifically suggesting which Chi-
nese government should take over from Japan. Taiwan's position
remained to be decided internationally. This line of argument was
repudiated immediately by both Taipei and Beijing. Suggestions were
then aired in the United Nations as to whether a UN supervised pIebi-
seite should be held in Taiwan to determine whether the majority of the
people would wish to become part of China. This foolish sugges-
tion was again immediately dismissed by Taiwan and Communist
China. War in Korea between the US forces and those of the PRC was
fought and areal possibility of another war emerged in 1958 when the
communists launched their heaviest attack on the island of Quemoy
which was China's own territory but under the control of the
Nationalist troops. To avoid such danger of war with the Chinese
communist regime, a 'two China theory' came into existence. If
acceptable to both Taipei and Beijing, US relations with both of them
would have been quickly transformed. This proposal was unacceptable
to either one. The Nationalist government insisted on its legality, as
elected in 1948 by the people on the mainlartd, to govern the entire
country once it could achieve a victory on the mainland. The
communist government, on the other hand, vowed to complete its war
of liberation against Taiwan. Neither government can be blamed by
the Chinese citizens for their common claim that 'Taiwan is apart of
218 China Under Deng Xiaoping
China'. In any case, the United States could not untie the Taiwan
tangle, Iegally, politically or militarily. The majority of nations
continued in the 1960s to retain diplomatie relations with the
Nationalist Government and supported the US position for nearly
twenty years. The Cold War certainly was a major cause for nations
taking sides. The United States, as the leader of the free world,
commanded this position of prestige to retain the support from other
nations. However, the 'two China approach' in the early 1960s
remained condemned by both the ROC and the PRC.
The PRC's conflict with the Soviet Union and its military inability to
confront the Uni ted States was one of the major reasons for Beijing's
giving up the search for a military solution in Taiwan's liberation
problem. China's mad plunge into cultural revolution and power
struggle deprived the PRC of the ability to reclaim Taiwan. On the
other hand, the ROC be ca me gradually far more powerful after having
the armed forces well-equipped and trained by the United States.
However, the US would not allow the launehing of offensive action
along the China co ast. Thus, Washington effectively froze the Taiwan
Strait against any military action by either side in the 1960s. The
Nationalists' hope of returning to the mainland militarily or of
negotiating a settlement was thus totally frustrated. The government
under President Chiang Kai-shek was not intended to be retained in
Taiwan forever. However, he had no choice, given his defence alliance
with the United States. Beijing, on the other hand, was kept out of the
United Nations and the diplomatie community. I ts concentration on its
own domestic cultural revolution further isolated it from the outside
world, which was watehing US defeat and retreat from Vietnam. In
essen ce , both Chinas were powerless to make their own decision about
the unification. The superpower contest in Asia did not leave room for
any nation to manoeuvre. Thus, two Chinas have existed in practice,
but not in mutual recognition and have been at war since 1947.
However, the matter of highest order is to find Taipei and Beijing in
perfeet agreement in their undivided claim and devotion to the
unification of Taiwan to form 'One Single China'. No international
conspiracy can shake that determination to unite Chinese territories
and citizens some day under one single government.
When President Nixon wisely and correctly reviewed US policies
toward the PRC, Vietnam, and the Soviet Union, the Taiwan tangle
again became a painful reality. For example, the United States could
not simply cast away a loyal ally of two decades. Japan and South
Korea and the defence of Western Pacific Ocean required Taiwan to
'One Country, Two Systems' 219
associated with the poliey ehanges of the United States toward the
PRC. And the ROC has been either a benefieiary or a vietim of the
ehanges. Stability and peaee in the Taiwan region, and eeonomic
prosperity in Taiwan are, however, the two most positive and direet
benefits of US poliey. This very sueeess has further eomplieations for
Taiwan, the PRC, and the prospeet of Deng Xiaoping's 'One Country,
Two Systems' as a formula for peaeeful unifieation. The 'ball game' of
the future, however, will see the PRC and the ROC to rise above
selfish partisanship or not in their negotiation.
that agreements with them were never kept. Both during the war
against Japan and in the 1949 examples of negotiation they found
the Communists did not keep their promises - the promise to fight
Japan turned out to be a devotion to expanding the Red Army
rather than meeting the enemy on the battlefield, and the reason-
able peace offer in 1949 turned out to be a demand for uncondition-
al surrender and insistence on punishing the ROC 'war criminals';
3. The PRC's pressure to isolate and destroy ROC internationally has
been increased in recent years while tal king deceptively about
agreement for unification. For example, it tried to prevent the
ROC from purchasing arms abroad and establishing commercial
relations in friendly countries;
4. The ROC is in a process of political integration in party leadership
to include local Taiwan representatives in central government.
Democracy in Taiwan must be met with the introduction of genuine
democracy on the Communist side. The 'four cardinal principles:
(especially proletarian democratic dictatorship under communist
leadership ) cannot be accepted as a suitable political and economic
system for China. Sun Yat-sen's doctrine is the only basis for the
unification of China in the future;
5. The lack of political stability in the PRC makes any negotiation and
agreement undependable as a solution. Intra-party faction al
conflicts form a serious cause of political instability. The PRC has
not yet succeeded in an institutionalised transfer of leadership
through elections;
6. The nine-point peaceful unification proposal would be, in practice,
adegradation of the ROC to a provincial level position, not a
guarantee of equal footing during the period of the 'Special
Administrative Region'. This is really a surrender call. At the same
time, the ROC leadership can not fail to note that Beijing has not
relinquished the use of force on Taiwan. Once the ROC has
accepted the pe ace proposal, she could not remain independent in
foreign trade and in purchase of arms abroad because the laws of
the National People's Congress will be applied in Taiwan according
to Article 31 of the 1982 Constitution. Even without any direct
contact on future unification, the PRC has already strongly
opposed the ROC's purchase of arms from the United States. In
essence, the ROC does not trust the communist offer for unifica-
tion. Much can be at stake on ce the offer is entertained as a basis for
negotiation.
'One Country, Two Systems' 223
by the 1960s, although many had come to Japan before 1945. They
were, however, split by factionalism. Wen Y. Liao, a well-known
leader of them, once said; 'Factionalism? Everyone has a different
explanation and they are all partly right'. 40 Those in the United States
organised themselves as Uni ted Formosans in America for Independ-
ence (UFAI) who had their own publications. Others were scattered in
Canada and Western Europe. While in Europe, they, too, created
their own organisation, Union for Formosa's independence in Europe
(UFIE). Their headquarters was in Paris in the middle 1960s.
Eventually, after most countries recognised communist China in the
1970s, these anti-government Taiwanese gradually moved to the
Uni ted States. Factionalism among them seems to be growing worse.
Another type of younger and better educated Taiwanese emerged in
the forefront in the late 1970s calling themselves members of
'revolutionarynational liberation movement'. They attempted to
adopt the Marxist-Maoist strategy in their Taiwan Independence
Movement (TIM) to terrorise and destroy so as to interrupt normal
urban life. Both in Taiwan and abroad, they spread false propaganda
to embarrass the Chiang regime which, they asserted, 'had pillaged the
land and the people' and was unable to m::tke economic progress. By
the late 1970s these 'radical revolutionary' groups increasingly relied
on terrorist actions to accomplish Taiwan Independence through an
'urban guerrilla' strategy. Altogether some twenty-six incidents of
violence were committed between 1970 and 1983 as documented by A.
James Gregor. 41 The most widely reported violence was the attempted
assassination ofVice-premier Chiang Ching-Kuo in New York City on
24 April 1970 by two members of TIM (Chiang Tsu-tsai and Huang
Wen-hsuing). They tried to bomb power installations (January 1976),
to assassinate Governor Hsieh Tung-ming (October 1976), and to
destroy dams, bus, and newspaper buildings between 1980 and 1983 in
Taiwan. In foreign countries, they killed ROC government diplomats
(Paris, 1983), burned the KMT news department (New York 1979),
damaged China Airline Office (Chicago 1980) or planned arson.
However, such violence did not stir the people and did not achieve
their political purpose. The violent movement itself collapsed. As the
KMT govemment under late President Chiang Ching-Kuo has stead-
ily moved forward to achieve economic miracles, he became more and
more popular among the native people throughout the island. Per
capita income and GNP rose and political violence declined. The
independence movement lost its appeal for the Taiwanese people both
on the island and abroad. Rather it was the struggle to open up the
political system for pluralism in participatory democracy that has
'One Country, Two Systems' 235
7.2.4 Conclusion
Hong Kong and Taiwan are too different to be treated in the same
manner. It is much easier to obtain a joint dedaration from the British.
Hong Kong is much within the PRC's re ach politically and commer-
cially. There is an inevitable continuity of mutual dependence between
Hong Kong and the PRC. None as such exists between the PRC and
the ROC as yet. There is a third superpower, the United States, acting
on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to exercise a balancing influence as it
sees fit. This tri angular relation will not change until the PRC is ready
or is powerful enough to risk a diplomatie showdown with Washing-
ton. Secondly, Taiwan's independent-minded population exerts only
strong but negative influence on the ROC government in the latter's
attitude toward reunification. Thirdly, the open agreement of 'one
236 China Under Deng Xiaoping
237
238 China Under Deng Xiaoping
to provoke the least resistance and to maxi mise support from with-
in the policy-making machinery and the population at large. His life-
time experience now became his best inner guiding voice for action
or silence. He needed the 'Four Cardinal Principles' to assure his
opponents - the socialist path, the Communist Party leadership,
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, and democratic dictatorship. On the
other hand, he insisted on 'practice as the sole test for truth' as a
justification to free his hand for experiment with his 'black-and-white
cat' theory.
As the confident grand reformer sitting on top of a gigantic
bureaucracy, Deng had by tale 1978, finally found a new team of
leaders to set his reform in motion. They did the work, and he guided
their pace for reform and the critical thinking for the next right move:
from the countryside to urban centre, from the party to the
government, and from the undoing of the Maoist cultural revolution to
his four modernisations. Detailed policy planning, policy implementa-
tion and programme supervision and evaluation were the tasks
assigned to others. Deng shared his leadership and decision-making
power with chief supporters. As a former bureaucratic chief adminis-
trator, Deng knew the importance of respecting the organisational
division of responsibility and role assignment. Thus, he could keep
hirnself free from less important decision-making. He had to see far
ahead to discover solutions for new problems. For example, on the
reversion ofHong Kong and the re-unification with Taiwan, he offered
a long-term solution: 'One Country, Two Systems'. To attract foreign
technology and investment, he adopted the practice of the special
economic zone as a non-socialist sector of economic experiment.
These issues required careful judgement in an effort to keep all
conflicting political factions and ideological forces in balance.
To depict Deng's role in the PRC we are forced to view hirn and his
responsibility in historical perspective in order to judge whether or not
he can meet history's approval. The same applied to Chiang
Ching-Kuo in the ROC. There are three major political cultures or
ideologies which have interacted with each other since the turn of the
century. These three political traditions have never ceased to compete
with one another as China struggled to modernise itself to meet the
standard in global revolutionary development. They are the indige-
nous cultural tradition, the new democratic tradition of the revolution
of 1911, and the Marxist Sovietised revolution of 1949. The indigenous
Confucian political tradition is the most prominent and well-inte-
grated institutional system with which China has been totally and
Conclusion: Revolution, Continuity and Synthesis 239
proudly identified for more than 2000 years. The entire treasury of
Chinese civilisation is the substance of this tradition. But without
change in some parts of this indigenous tradition, China could not
bring itself into the modern world. It was inappropriate to resist the
challenge of foreign science, industry, liberty, equality, and political
democracy. If there was no way to peacefully change the old or
traditional China, a revolution to overthrow the old political system
was the only approach to revitalise China in order to resist foreign
imperialist encroachment which began in the 1890s. So there must be
revolution for a new China.
But how to bring about a new China? What new ideology has been
introduced into China in the last ninety years has resulted in an
excruciating, bitter experience in modern Chinese history . What
kind of a future did the revolution of 1911 accomplish for the people?
Why did that revolution abort? Certainly many Chinese in gen-
eral can emphatically agree that the meaning of liberty, equality,
popular democracy, and constitutional system of government that
they have learned before 1949 are attributable to the revolution
of 1911.
Why was there a need for a Marxist revolution in China shortly after
the October victory in 1917 in Russia? Unfortunately, lack of space
does not permit a lengthy discussion here. However, a simple
overview on each of all three traditions is necessary in order to
appreciate that aH revolutions create changes. Continuity of parts of
the indigenous tradition always remains visible. What is changed and
what remains visible must be synthesised for the new order to integrate
after a major revolution. This is now the task of Deng Xiaoping, to
understand correctly historical continuity. Every major revolution,
including the American and the French revolutions of 1776 and 1789,
has its own ideological tenets to justify the revolt and to bring about a
new way of life. What should be Deng's new ideological tenets after
having seen the failure of Sovietised Marxism in China and the
bankruptcy of radicalleftist Maoism in the aftermath of the cultural
revolution? The new measuring formula that 'practice is the sole test of
truth' is itself not an ideological truth but a working tool in
policy-making choice. It is not an ideological system in itself that can
be used to debate and defeat Marxism, or to repudiate the doctrine of
the revolution of 1911. To meet this ideological vacuum or void, one
must carefully identify, first of all, the three major ideological, or
political traditions. All three have had their supporters and antagon-
ists in twentieth-century China. As a value system in political culture,
240 China Under Deng Xiaoping
what do the one billion Chinese like or dislike after having lived under
all three - the indigenous Confucian tradition up to 1911, the tradition
of the Revolution of 1911, and the Marxist tradition since 1949? I shall
focus below on an over-simplified summary of the political culture of
each of the three.
man and civilliberties, individualism and equality, and, above all, the
doctrines of three-way separation of power and constitutional
government slowly but steadily found their way to imperial China. So
the Chinese societal integrity and political system became bankrupt
before the turn of the century. When constitutional reform under Kang
Yu-wei and Liang Chi' -chiao failed in 1898,2 the only way out to rescue
the nation was through Sun Yat-sen's revolution to establish a
democratic system of government.
What were other aspects of the political culture in the Confucian
system of society? Are any of the tradition al values still strongly
adhered to by the average Chinese people? How much of the traditional
heritage was adopted in the behavioural pattern of many leaders of the
Nationalist party and the Communist Party? Any responses to these
questions cannot be adequate without knowing the nature of the
Confucian society - its structure in human relations, dass stratification
or mobility and the philosophy of life. To begin with, the Confucian
philosophy rests on the belief that every person must play his or her role
in a structured relationship of authority to maintain a balance and
harmony. Any good government must enforce the well-prescribed code
of ethics that is required of each person. For example, filial piety and the
extended family of complex human relationships were expected to
demonstrate the cardinal virtues in human nature. Agentieman of the
society earns his title through learning and his demonstration of dassical
virtues. He occupies a socially elevated position of prestige. He is
entitled thus to enter government service through passing various
imperial examinations. Such a scholar-gentry came into existence in the
Han Dynasty. The learned men, as bureaucratsor aristocrats, governed
continuously while emperors and dynasties came and went. Confucian
precepts of etiquette and rituals were sources of law that was
enforceable by the state authority. The traditional political system in
China was derived from the Confucian concepts of a hierarchical
authority structure. Since the Han dynasty, Confucian teaching became
the official ideology of the imperial state at the expense of others,
induding legalism, Taoism and Yin-yang theory. Or rather, other
ancient schools of learning were gradually incorporated into 'official
Confucian religion of state' under the 'Son of Heaven' as emperor. His
authority was unlimited. The people had little to say against the
emperor, contrary to modern constitutional heads of state.
The Confucian social-hierarchical code of ethical conduct was
fully implemented through education and social organisations to such
an extent that individuals, families, villages, towns, counties, as self-
Conclusion: Revolution, Continuity and Synthesis 243
ary Chinese people, Mao stands a condemned tyrant who was worse
than the First Emperor or the Chin Dynasty, in his radical uprooting of
indigenous tradition in favour of an outlandish, inapplicable and
bankrupt application of Marxist political ideology.
It is now up to Deng Xiaoping to reverse Mao's ignorance and his
leftist radicalism. The revival of Confucian learning in China in recent
years is a good sign of constructive attitude toward the nation's cultural
past. Restoration of Confucian temples and documentation of his life
through movie pictures represent a proper shift in cultural develop-
ment. Deng's 'Socialism with Chinese Characteristics' will in time
demonstrate what characteristics will be discovered and preserved.
Compared with the 'bourgeois revolution' of 1911 and the policy on
cultural development, Taiwan's attitude toward indigenous cultural
tradition is much more in harmony with the goals of life in the past.
Individualism and personal rights of the bourgeois revolution of 1911
are in deep conflict with the proletarian revolution of 1949. They both
must in time find proper reconciliation if the two parts of China are to
be unified peacefully. In short, Deng should be seriously concerned
about China's Confucian cultural tradition and its way of life. Every
nation values its heritage. Chinese civilisation and cultural values are
deeply respected everywhere in the world outside ofthe PRC. Foreign
scholars, for example, admire the Chinese family system and concept
of friendship. Chinese arts, poetry, and ancient cIassics. seem more
valued elswhere than in China. Recent tourism in China should
encourage many Chinese to realise that their cultural heritage and
traditional philosophy of life have attracted millions of foreigners.
Any revolutionary excess and the blind condemnation of the past tend
to misjudge the past cultural achievement. Creativity in arts and
literature should be insulated from any revolutionary condemnation
for its immediate political purposes, such as the wholesale condem-
nation of the past during Mao's cultural revolution of 1966--76.
Future Chinese leaders must realise the need for cultural pluralism.
There must be some cultural independence from political persecution
for the sake of preserving the culture itself. The Chinese people will
continue to love their past culture and will protect the cultural values
as part oftheir reallife. Politics must not be in command of everything.
Modernisation itself will inevitably lead to cultural pluralism. Deng's
reform policies in politics and economics will still come into conflict
with indigenous tradition, unless the leadership realises the need for
cultural independence.
Conclusion: Revolution, Continuity and Synthesis 245
Sun Yat-sen was the first Westernised Chinese leader who devoted his
entire life to change imperial China through political revolution, or the
overthrow of the Manchu dynasty. In its place, a republic of China was
to be established to achieve modernity for the nation. This task
included, among other things, the following:
1. Development of anational self-consciousness to resist foreign
aggression and to abolish the 'une qual treaties'. This policy would
bring China to a level to be treated with equality among nations
under internationallaw;
2. To create a democratic political system to allow the citizens, for
the first time in history , to elect their leaders in government at all
levels. This would have made government responsible to the
average citizens. Failing in their Constitutional duties, the elected
officials could be recalled from offices;
3. To introduce a peaceful system of land reform to divide land
equally among the tillers. This would have stopped rural exploita-
tion by landlords. His revolution proposed a mechanism to regulate
industrial capital to prevent the evils of Western unregulated
capitalism which had occurred in the nineteenth century;
4. To attract international investment and technology to help develop
Chinese industries. This would have kept China open to the outside
world and also would have enable China to contribute to
international peace and security.
In short Sun Yat-sen's doctrines of nationalism, democracy and the
livelihood of the people were three tools to achieve modernisation for
China. But, for a variety of reasons beyond his control, his revolution
failed. Sun himself listed so me reasons as folIows: (1) Foreign
imperialists intervened on behalf of their existing special privileges
and interest in China as guaranteed by the 'unequal treaties' which
they had imposed on China unilaterally; (2) many foreign states
supported Yuan Shih-Kai, the traitor of the revolution, and other
regional warlords who succeeded Yuan upon his death in 1916; and
most important of all, (3) his followers as revolutionary leaders failed
to understand the task of the revolution and to reconstruct a new nation
of democracy, industrial development and national unity through new
nationalism. Thus, his followers were divided aimlessly, factionalised
over minor disagreements, and disappointed with the consequences of
246 China Under Deng Xiaoping
Despite the peace overtures from the PRC, and so me US$700 million
of indirect trade through Hong Kong, President Chiang Ching-Kuo's
policy toward the PRC was still the 'three nos approach: 'No
compromise. No contact and No negotiation'. He was prepared to wait
252 China Under Deng Xiaoping
This issue legally found its constitutional answer in the 1984 presi-
dential election. President Chiang chose Li Teng-hui as vice-president
of the ROC. Li had a strong academic background before becoming
the mayor of Taipei and the governor of Taiwan. He is a native-
254 China Under Deng Xiaoping
8.3.4 Conclusion
after 1925, and to resist and defeat Japan in the end to regain Chinese
sovereignty over Taiwan. During the 1930s, China regained sovereign
control over her lost rights through renegotiation to abolish the
'un-equal treaties'. These included customs rights and foreign conces-
sions in many coastal cities. He expanded education, built transporta-
tion, and made preparation against foreign aggression.
Due to its own corruption and other factors, the ROC government
was defeated in 1949 on mainland China. But Sun's legacy has
continued in Taiwan. The ROC government succeeded in peaceful
land reform and in economic development. Now the experience of
success should be taken as positive reference in China's modernisation
under the communist leadership. Taiwan's success has already become
a model example for many developing countries in the world. It must
not be sacrificed after reunification in some future time. Taiwan is part
of China; so is the legacy apart of Chinese experience in modernisa-
tion. Sun's doctrine of revolution has brought prosperity to the people
in Taiwan. It should be of aid and reference to Deng's 'Socialism with
Chinese Characteristics'.
Today in China, the people have more purchasing power. Stores are
full of consumer goods. Demands for consumption remain higher
than the market can supply. Prices of rare articles rise faster because
there are more consumers who want them. The trend is toward market-
isation and privatisation on daily goods and services. There is much less
regulation in this daily service economy. Food grain growth and cotton
production both are so greatly increased that a rationing system is no
Ion ger used. Statistics show great success in many production fields.
1986, for example, registered an overall steady growth. There was
good harvest in the rural economy. Total grain output was reported at
390 million tons, an increase of 10 million tons over the previous year.
Livestock breeding, aquaculture and fishery and many other con-
sumer goods all registered satisfactory growth. 14 The total agricultural
output was expected to reach 303.8 billion yuan, a 4.4 per cent growth
over 1985. Rural industry grew in 1986 by 21 per cent more than in
1985, reaching a total of330 billion yuan. In industry, 'overheating', as
in the previous two years, was arrested. The total industrial output was
expected to reach 980 billion yuan with an 8.7 per cent gain over 1985.
Production of major raw materials, steel, copper , cement and iron, for
example, all recorded a 10 per cent increase. There was a dear
satisfaction over the balance between heavy and light industry.
Gradually, but not satisfactorily, the PRC has achieved better control
over capital investment. Some 194 billion yuan went into investment of
'fixed assets in state-owned' areas in 1986. It represented 15 per cent
more than in 1985 which had reached a 41.8 per cent of 1984 growth.
So me 200 export-oriented light industrial and textile projects were
completed in 1985. They could earn an annual income of $US400
million in foreign currencies. In 1986, some ninety production centres
were organised to produce electrical machines for export. Exports
rose 14.7 per cent over previous year, while imports were kept at the
Conclusion: Revolution, Continuity and Synthesis 259
level as planned. Trade deficit, thus, was $US4 billion less in 1986
than in the previous year. A drop in oil prices on the international
market adversely affected the trade deficit. Sources of credit in bank
deposits in the year rose to 56 billion yuan more for a total of 218
billion yuan which were available for industrial and agricultural
production and construction. In short, some years are better than
others because of luck; other years may suffer from greater inter-
national trade or other financial difficulties, in addition to natural
disasters or droughts and floods in the agricultural sector . The
economy is now much better managed since Deng's reforms of 1978.
Improved methods in statistical collection and interpretation has
represented a giant step forward in the management field.
The PRC's economy before 1979 was influenced by two basic factors:
the Soviet pattern of structure and Mao Zedong's radical mistakes.
The setbacks resulted from Mao's mistakes in the great leap, rural
262 China Under Deng Xiaoping
deliberative body in the same building, the people's hall, where the
National People's Congress (NPC) meets. However, the CPPCC does
not have constitutional power. It has, on the contrary, only an advisory
capacity. Deng's socialist democracy has meant tolerance toward
direct and constructive popular criticism. Anyone who visits China
and mingles among inteUectuals, students, and in rural areas will detect
a relaxed atmosphere and open exchange of policy evaluatiot:t. There
has been repeated assurance of the new liberal policy toward writers,
artists, religious leaders, church organisations, teachers, and there is
now a greater degree of academic freedom for discussion. In many
respects, Deng's 'socialist legality' implies also a new reform policy
toward judicial exercise of power, support for a new legal profession,
restoration of law schools and legislation of new criminal and civil
procedural codes, and so on. The trend appears to be in the direction
of institutionalisation of political and legal stability. In time, the rule of
law may replace the rule of man. However, there is a long way toward
a system of democracy and a system of legal, and objective justice
guaranteed by the state. For example, a democratic constitution must
be approved by a majority of the people directly. Political decision
should not replace legal judgement. No individual or party should be
above the laws of the state. The court system and judicial decisions
must not serve as instruments of any political party. These are some
obvious aspects of 'the rule of law' in any democractic country.
Furthermore, the rule of law, or socialist legality, is inseparable from a
genuine political democracy which itself must recognise and protect
basic civil liberties and universal human rights as enshrined in the
Declaration of Human Rights Charter of 1948. There are, of course,
special obstacles in China to the realisation of both political democracy
and judicial independence. For example, the ancient Confucian state
disregarded positive law in favour of morality. Today Marxist ideology
places the morality represented by the Communist Party above
positive law as the 'guardian of the revolution'. In the ancient Chinese
tradition, collectivism of family, clan, and village identity was far more
important for protection than the recognition of the individual person
and his 'inalienable rights'. But the revolution of 1911 and the
contemporary universal demands for liberties and equality seem to
have forged in China an irreconcilable and irreversible requirement for
such constitutional rights. As people's living standards rise, demands
for rights and equality will be likely to grow stronger, although the
realisation of such rights may take a very long time to achieve. When
that day comes, China will have acquired a new tradition. It is in this
Conclusion: Revolution, Continuity and Synthesis 269
and his own leadership position in the party. 44 In any case, even after
Deng, demands for democratic reforms will not end but may suffer
from many small sacrifices. In my judgment, theoretically, economic
and political reform must proceed together. Ideally, political reform
should lead the way.
On 31 July 1986, four months before the recent student demonstra-
tion, Vice-premier Wan Li and Deng's friend and also a member of the
powerful Political Bureau of the Party, made a speech entitled
'Making Policies Democratically and Scientifically - An Important
Problem of Political Restructuring'. He made many major points in
that much-quoted speech, including the following: 45
of self reform. They both must, in the interest of the nation, put aside
their mutual antagonism. It seems hopeful lately that both appear
moving toward each other. For example, exchange of visits and
indirect trade are welcome beginnings in 1987, and can generate new
opportunities for mutual accommodations in the interests of eventual
reunification. The ROC under President T. H. Li must not move
toward separatism to avoid the PRC's decision to unite both by
military means. The PRC must consolidate its leadership under Chao
Ziyang to reduce dependency on Mr Deng as crisis arbiter and to
subdue the conservative-Ieftists in the interest of accelerating political
reform, wh ich is a necessary precondition in ultimate economic reform
success. On the other hand, short-run economic success does breed
new needs in political reform. Preference is for politics to lead
economics to maximise efficiency in reform progress.
N otes and References
1 Introduction
1. Beijing Review, 8 April 1985, p. 6 (also ibid., 15 July 1985, pp. 6-11).
2. Ibid., p. 7.
3. These trips brought me and my visiting party to Guangzhou, Guilin,
Kunning, Zhengdu, Chongqing, Xian, Taiyuan, Beijing, Tiangin,
DaQing Oilfield, Harbin, Changchun, Zhenyang, Anshan, Dalian
Shanghai, Hangzhou, Suzhou Wuxi, Changsha, Wuhan and Yanan. At
each place I had both escorted and unescorted interviews of my own
choosing.
4. See Toward the Year 1997: (Hong Kong's Future, Hong Kong: Qiong
Pao Cultural Enterprise, 1983).
5. Hungda Chiu and others (eds.) China's Unification and the Question of
Negotiation, (Rushing, NY.; World Journal Books, 1982).
6. Beijing Review, 24 September 1984, p. 6, and pp. 20-21.
7 Ibid., 17 June 1985, p. 8.
8. See the government document announced on 20 October 1984 on
'Enterprise Management Decision-making'. People's Daily, Beijing,
25 October 1984.
9. Robert A. Scalapino, paper read at the Symposium on the East
Asia-Pacific Base Area Economic Development, 9 and 10 September
(Berkeley: University of California, 1985).
10. For greater understanding, see Dorothy J. Salinger Three Visions of
Chinese Socialism (Boulder, Col.: Westview) and also Frederick C.
Teiwes (1984) Leadership, Legitimacy and Conflict in China: From a
Characteristic Mao to the Politics of Succession (London: Macmillan,
1984).
11. See James L. Watson (ed.) Class and Social Stratification in Post-Mao
China (London: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
12. 18 September 1985, People's Daily, Beijing.
279
280 Notes and References
September 1984, pp. 17-18. See also People's Daily, 22 August 1984.
The English version is a shorter summary of the Chinese language
version in The People's Daily.
7. David W. Chang, Chinese Leadership Succession Crisis ch. 4, pp.
197-206.
8. Ibid., pp. 209-27.
9. The Resolution of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist
Party on some Historical Problems Since 1949 (Beijing: Hsinhau
Bookstore, The People's Press, 1981, in Chinese).
10. Ibid., pp. 21-2.
11. Ibid., p. 25.
12. David W. Chang, Chinese Leadership Succession Crisis, pp. 218-
20.
13. Fang Shei-chun, Hu Yaobang and Chinese Communist Politics (Taipei:
Liu Hsueh Press, 1983, pp. 11-49).
14. San Francisco Examiner, 18 September 1985.
15. Ibid., 29 September 1985. See also China Daily, 29 September 1985.
(English edition published in the USA).
16. The People's Daily, 30 September 1985.
17. The People's Daily, 14 December 1984.
18. Workers Daily, 4, March 1984.
19. Ibid., 11 March 1981.
20. Editorial office, Worker's Press, Persistence on the Four Cardinal
Principles, (Beijing: Workers Press) 1 May 1981 (Chinese).
21. Hsinhua Book Store, Deng Xiaoping Wenxuam, 1975-1982 (Beijing;
The People's Press, 1983) pp. 35-6.
22. Ibid., pp. 131-43.
23. Ibid., p. 151.
24. Beijing Review, 23 September 1985, p. 4
25. Editorial office, Beijing Review, China After Mao: A Collection of 80
Essays, 1984, p. 54. See also: Learning From the Constitution of the
12th Party Congress, by the Research Centre of the CCP Secretariat,
December 1981 (Beijing: Hsinhua Press, 1981).
26. Chen Yun, Guang Ming Ribao, 18 September 1982 (an influential daily
newspaper in Shanghai)
27. Beijing Review, 30 September 1985.
28. Deng Xiaoping, Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, 1975-1982
(Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1984), pp. 394--7.
22. The People's Daily, Beijing, 21 October 1984. Also see the first half of
Chapter 6 of this book.
1. See Ma Hung, New Strategy for China's Economy, esp. eh. 2, pp.
31-82 (Beijing: New World Press, 1983).
2. Xue Muqiao, China's Sodalist Economy, eh. 9, pp. 234--65. (Beijing:
Foreign Language Press, 1981). See also Beijing Review, no. 14, p. 8,
April 1985.
3. The China Handbook Editorial Committee, Economy, (Beijing:
Foreign Language Press, 1984). (translated into English by Hu
GengKang, Liu Bingwen and others). p. 3.
4. Peasant households in mutual aid teams of early private cooperatives by
growth percentages between 1950 and 1956 as folIows: 1950 (10.7),1951
(19.2), 1952 (40.0), 1953 (39.5). 1954 (60.3), 1955 (64.9), and 1956
(97.2). See the handbook series title Economy, p. 19, 1984. Point
system was adapted to local circumstances.
5. The China Handbook Editorial Committee, Economy, p. 40.
6. Ibid., p. 42.
7. Ibid., p. 52; see also Beijing Review, no. 5, p. 4, February 1985.
8. Ibid., p. 54.
9. Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on
Reform of the Economic Structure, adopted by the Twelfth Central
Notes and References 285
22. Fang Sheng, 'Is Chinese Special Economic Zone a Capitalist Develop-
ment? - Answer to the Question of a Foreign Friend'. This was given to
me to read during the interview. I am not aware of its publication
outside China anywhere yet. See p. 7. (Fang is a well-known
economist.) The essay advoeates a mixed or pluralistie eeonomy for
China.
23. China's Foreign Economic Legislation (CFEL), vol. 1, no. 1, published
by Foreign Language Press, Beijing, 1982 and 1984 (seeond printing).
It includes some twenty-two different laws, regulations, and procedures
governing foreigners, their investment, ineome, profit, wh ether in joint
venture or individually.
24. CFEL, vol. I, no. 1, p. 2, articles 3 and 4.
25. Ibid., p. 7.
26. CFEL, p. 3fr-7.
1. Mirrow Monthly, Toward the year 1997: the Future problems of Hong
Kong, A special Issue, (Hong Kong: The Mirrow Cultural Enterprise
Co., July, 1983), p. 173.
2. Ibid.,174.
3. Hungdah Chiu (ed.), 'The 1984 Sino-British Settlement on Hong Kong:
Problems and Analysis', in Symposium on Hong Kong: 1997, Occas-
ional Papers/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, no. 3,
1985, pp. 1-13; and the Joint Declaration itself of26 September 1984.
4. See the Joint Declaration and Article 31 of the PRC constitution.
5. Ibid., p. 13.
6. Hong Kong Government Information Services Publication, No.
6/1985, February 4--10, p. 1.
7. Ibid., no. 10/85, 11-17 March 1985, p. 2.
8. Ibid., no. 39/85,30 September-6 Oetober 1985, p. 1.
9. Ibid., no 44/85, 4--10 November 1985, p. 1.
10. Hsing Kuo-ehiang, 'The Drafting of aBasie Law for Hong Kong', Issues
and Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, June 1986, pp. 1-4.
11. International Daily News, San Franciseo (Chinese language), 25
Deeember 1985.
12. Editorial essay, Ibid., 27 Deeember 1985, p. 2.
13. Ibid., 17 Deeember 1986.
14. See also Ambrose Y. C. King, 'The Hong Kong Talks and Hong Kong
Polities', Issues and Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, 1986, pp. 52-75.
15. Ibid., p. 74; and also Kuan Hsin-Chi and Lau Siu-Kai, 'Hong Kong in
Seareh of a Consensus', Occasional Paper, The Centre for Hong Kong
Studies, (Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong,
November 1985), p. 23.
16. Harry Harding, 'The Future of Hong Kong', China Business Review,
vol. 12, no. 5, September-Oetober 1985, pp. 30-7.
17. Beijing Review, vol. 29, no. 49,8 Deeember 1986, p. 5.
18. See I-Ching Tsou, 'The CCP's 'One Country, Two Systems', Studies in
Notes and References 287
Communism, vol. 12, no. 7, 15 July, 1986, pp. 1-9. This is a negative
view representing Taiwan's position.
19. Beijing Review, 5 October, 1981, p. 10, 'Chairman Yi Jianying's
Elaboration on Policy Concerning Return ofTaiwan to Motherland and
Peaceful Reunification'.
20. Beijing Review, vol. 21, no.l, 5 January, 1979.
21. Hungdah Chiu, 'Prospect for the Vnification of China: an Analysis of
the Views of the Republic of China', Occasional Papers/Reprint Series
in Contemporary Asia, Law School ofthe University of Maryland, no. 3,
1985, pp. 81-92.
22. Ibid., p. 88.
23. Sun Yun-suan, United Daily News (international edn), 12 June 1982,
p.3.
24. Li Shenzhi and Zi Zhongjun, 'Taiwan in the Next Ten Years'. Speech
given at the Seminar of the Council of Atlantic Organization, New
York, 1985. The chief author is the Vice-president of the Chinese
Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China. He was an expert and
participant in foreign policy of the PRC since Zhou Enlai's time. This
long paper represents the PRC spectrum on the Taiwan tangle.
25. Ibid., p. 7 (of the original Chinese version)
26. Ibid., p. 8.
27. Huan Xiang, foreign diplomat and former Vice-president of the
Chinese Academy of Social Science. Presently he is the advisor of the
Foreign Policy Research Group of the State Council. Our interview
took place on 12 July 1985.
28. The author of this policy paper, Li Shenzhi gran ted me an interview on
10 July, 1985, in Beijing. He gave me a copy ofhis paper to the Seminar
of the 1985 Atlantic Organization in the United States. My interview
lasted for three hours and focused on this paper. I did not see the second
author, Zi Zhongun, ofthe same artide. (See Ibid., p. 17.)
29. Zhang Hongzeng, 'V.S. Taiwan Relations Act Viewed Against
International Law', in Selected Articles from Chinese Yearbook of
International Law, (Beijing: China Translation & Publishing Corpora-
tion, 1983), p. 189. See also two statements made by a V.S. State
Department spokesman on 6 and 10 February 1981.
30. Ibid., p. 191.
31. Taiwan: Hearings, Spring, 1978,2979, Congressional Record pp. 48-9.
32. Hungdah Chiu, James C. Hsiung and Ying-Mao Kau (eds.), Anthology
on Reunification and Negotiation between the PRC and the ROC,
135-16, 39th Ave. (Flushing, New York: World Daily Journal, Book
Division, 1982), pp. 1-4.
33. This five-point condusion is the summary of a conference held in
Washington, DC on 17 April 1982. Some nine main speakers were
heard. The views of the participants have long been known to
intellectual Chinese in the United States through their own personal
publications.
34. John F. Copper and George P. Chen, 'Taiwan's Elections: Political
Development and Democratisation in the Republic of China, Occas-
ional papers/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies. no. 5,
288 Notes and Relerences
1984, School ofLaw, University ofMaryland, chs 1 and 4, esp. pp. 57-8
on election statistics.
35. Ramon H. Myers, 'Political Change and Democracy in the Republic of
China, 1986', unpublished paper. Hoover Institution of War, Revolu-
tion and Peace, Stanford University, p. 4. This paper provides a good
evaluation of changes in 1986 and other details on the formation of the
Democratic Progressive Party.
36. Ibid., p. 12.
37. A. James Gregor and Maria Hsia Chang, 'The Taiwan Independence
Movement', in Political Communication and Persuasion, vol. 2, no, 4,
1985, pp. 363-91.
38. Douglas Mendel, The Politics 01 Formosan Nationalism (Berkeley and
Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970), p. 249.
39. Ibid., p. 147.
40. Ibid.,p.149.
41. A. James Gregor and Maria Hsia Chang, 'The Taiwan Independence
Movement', pp. 371-75.
42. Peter Kien-hong Yu. 'The Taipei-Washington-Peking Triangle: the
Taiwan Experience as a Catalyst for China's Reunification', Asian
Outlook, vol. 21, no. 8, August 1986, pp. 17-19.
291
292 Index
78,80,237,257,268,269,276 7-8,15,16,28,57,143,186,
'socialist path' 28,30,47,48,50 215-36,251-5; PRC conditions
soil erosion 132,139 for unification 199-201 , 206,
Song Ping 106 228; links with China 79, 152,
South-East Asia 179, 181, 225 156,187,216,252; tieswith
Special Economic Zones 65,75, West 13; defence treaty with
98,109,113,120,160,163,176, USA 217-19; supply of arms
177,194-5,209,238. See also to 218,219,222,225,228,229,
Shenzhen 252; armed forces 252,253;
specialisation and specialists 53, diplomatie relations 216-20,
72,107,140,142,145,169,178 224-8,233; standard of
speech, freedom of 56,80,206, living 229,234,250; land
208,215 reform and industrial
spiritual civilisation 16,19,28,75, modernisation 127,128,141,
118 144,165,230,266,267,277;
Stalin 60, 161, 164 educational expansion 230;
State Council 17,69, 106, 116, 124, National University 185-6;
173, 183,207 development of democracy
Statistical Bureau 100,260 in 9,13,17,222-5,229-33,
statistics: falsification of 87; 235,236,244,247,249-55;
improved methods 259 refugees from 228,231,233;
steeloutput 133, 165, 166,258 martiallaw 230-2,249,251-3;
steel, rolled, imports 107 effect of Hong Kong's
strike, right to 206,215 relationship with PRC 205,
students: increase in numbers 107, 208,209,225;sovereignty 217,
109, 120; agricultural 131; in 229; Taiwan Independence
Nanhai 158-9; at Movement 232-5
Shenzhen 186-7; Taiwan Relations Act 8,219,
demonstrations 40,223,236, 224-8
257,265,266,269-76 Taoism 242
subsidies 111, 114, 168, 169 taxation: in control of
Sun Yat-sen: revolution of 1911 1, economy 104,110,114,117,
11-12,20,34,60,198,238,239, 260; percentage of revenue 94,
241-9,255,266,268-9; 'Three 111-13;changesin 28,64,81,
Principles ofthe People' 9, 14, 85,96,101,115, 123, 173,264;
15,64,222-3, 236; open door Sun Yat-sen's proposals
policy 11-12; land policy 64, for 248; exemptions
126,245,248; democratic from 168, 169, 179; in Special
policies 15,20, 161; respect Economic Zones 113, 179,
for tradition al culture 247, 180,184,191-3; administration
255-6; plans for of 111,114,260
industrialisation 161; and teachers, shortage of 157-8
capitalism 50 technology: development and
Sun Yan-Suan 223 modernisation of 11, 12,48,
Sung dynasty 126 71,77,90,109,116,120,262;
Sweden 181 transformation of
enterprises 106-8, 111,
Taiwan: problem of independence of 113-15,118-20,160,164;
unification with China 3-4, import from West and
Index 303
Japan 12,27,34,49,63,65, tyrannicide, right of 67,240,241
75,89,91,97,98,107,125,176,
190-1,224,245; in Union for Formosa's Independence
Nanhai 146,147, 153; in in Europe 234
Shenzhen 178, 180, 182, 191-2 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics:
telecommunications 106, 178 involvement with Taiwan 7,
television courses 107, 11 0 218,226; relations with
television sets 101, 182 China 12,30,85, 161, 164,
tertiary industry see service 201,218,262; Soviet economic
enterprises model adopted by China 6,12,
textile industry 100, 109,258 13,17,55,60,85,127,162,164,
Thailand 185 167,239,243,261,266
Thatcher, Margaret 200-3 United Formosans in America for
'thought liberation' 51-2, 122, 147 Independence 234
Tian Jiyun 44,45 Uni ted Front 39
Tiananmen Square riot 24,30,32, Uni ted Nations 17, 23, 216-19
36,46,51,272 Uni ted States of America: Sun
Tibet 221 Yat-sen's model of
timber imports 107 democracy 161; links with
tourist industry 153, 177, 178, China 8,23,45,113,152,154;
180-2,185,186,197,250 interest in Shenzhen 79,181,
tractors 131, 167 185; and Hong Kong
trade, international 11, 12,56,65, passport 211; involvement
89,91,98,107,109,113,120, with Taiwan 8,196,216-20,
125, 197. See also exports; 222,224-8,233-5
imports urban economic restructuring: plans
traders, small 166,173 for 45, 161-3, 165; defects in
transport: improvements 5,11,71, structure 93; complications
77,89,90,119,262;needfor of 102,117,123,168; reform
system to link rural measures 92-9, 170, 176;
regions 159; key decentralisation and enterprise
projects 111; pe asant responsibility 6, 7, 11, 28, 30,
initiatives to finance 34,96-7,102,170,237;
projects 143; responsibility of restoration of township
government 96; contribution government 7; relation to
to national income 175; rural reforms 11, 18,89,93,
bottlenecks 101; in 140,143,159,162,265;
Nanhai 147, 157; in incomes 100, 134-5; budget
Shenzhen 178,181,185,188, allocation for
189; urban enterprises 94. See construction 114; regional
also railways; roads; waterways centres 119; in Nanhai 145-7
treasury bonds 111, 113-4
treaties: unequal, imposed by Vietnam 194,218
West 11,197,201-3,245,246, village committees 159
255; multilateral, relating to
Hong Kong 210 wages: reforms in system 102-3,
trials, televised, of Gang of 105,108,114,123,141,171,
Four 26,33 175,195,264; differentials 28,
Truman,HarryS. 216,217 84-6,93,97,103,121,134,170,
304 Index