ESTEEM
ESTEEM
0 Project Briefing
For our project, we choose a one storey houses. This project will be located at
Lot 2109-2011, Jalan Parit Bengkok, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor.
With the built area this house is big and it has some ground for any activities
such as gardening. This house have car porch that can fit 2 cars. At the ground
floor this house was built with living room for the family to gather. It also has
some dining room for the family to have their meal in the ground floor. This
house has a kitchen and also the bath. The best part of this house is it has two
types of kitchen that is wet kitchen and the dry kitchen.
At the 1st floor, when we climb the stairs, the first thing that we can see is the
family hall. Then, there was a master room. Some houses got their bathroom
in their room but this house got a unique design where it separate between the
master room and the bathroom. At this first floor also have a bedroom 1 and
bedroom 2 and balcony.
For our project that build a one storey houses that located at Lot 2109-2011,
Jalan Parit Bengkok, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor. The contractor and
architecture is from a same company that under a Group 2 Sdn Bhd.
The Group 2 Sdn Bhd was established in 20 September 2015 and is registered
(JM0228574-K) with the founding director, Juliza binti Abu Bakar. The
company is based in No 73, Wisma G2, Jalan Flora 1, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu
Pahat, Johor.
Regarding to the relevant standard codes and guidance our company using will
use references as below:
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Maximum Concrete Strain, Ecc = 0.0035
Average Concrete Stress above Neutral Axis, k1 = 12.12 N/mm²
Concrete Lever Arm Factor, k2 = 0.4518
Limiting Effective Depth Factor, cb = 0.50
k2 / k1 Factor, kkk = 0.0373
Limiting Concrete Moment Capacity Factor, kk1 = cb × k1 × (1 - cb * k2) = 0.50 × 12.12 × (1 - 0.50 ×
0.4518) = 4.6911 N/mm²
No tension force within span from 3D analysis, tension reinforcement for beam is not required
New Deflection Ratio = (Br × MFt × MFc) / Ar = (26.0 × 2.00 × 1.09) / 7.2 = 7.88
Ratio >= 1.0 : Deflection Checked PASSED
No tension force within span from 3D analysis, tension reinforcement for beam is not required
New Deflection Ratio = (Br × MFt × MFc) / Ar = (26.0 × 2.00 × 1.09) / 4.6 = 12.39
Ratio >= 1.0 : Deflection Checked PASSED
No tension force within span from 3D analysis, tension reinforcement for beam is not required
Shear Link Area / Spacing Ratio, SAsv_Sv = (vd × b) / (fyy × fy) = (0.40 × 250) / (0.95 × 460) = 0.228
mm²/mm
New Deflection Ratio = (Br × MFt × MFc) / Ar = (26.0 × 1.92 × 1.09) / 7.9 = 6.90
Ratio >= 1.0 : Deflection Checked PASSED
ii. Slab
Average Concrete Stress above Neutral Axis, k1 = 0.40 × 30.0 = 12.12 N/mm²
Concrete Lever Arm Factor, k2 = 0.4518
Limiting Effective Depth Factor, cb = 0.50
Limiting Concrete Moment Capacity Factor, kk1 = cb × k1 × (1 - cb × k2)
= 0.50 × 12.12 × (1 - 0.50 × 0.4518) = 4.691N/mm²
k2 / k1 Factor, kkk = 0.037
iii. Column
FLOOR f1 COLUMN C7:(2A,C)
Sample Calculation for Nominal Moment using Beam f1B2(250x500)
Back Calculate Beam End Moment from the Top Rebar of Beam
Mu / bd² = p × fyd (1 - k2 × p × fyd / k1)
Design Moment due to Beam Top Bar, Mu = 1.2328 × 250 × 459² / 1000000 = 64.9 kNm
Moment Muy = -64.9 × Cos(0.00°) = -64.9 kNm
Moment Muz = 64.9 × Sin(0.00°) = 0.0 kNm
SLENDERNESS RESULT
Clause 3.8.1.6 : Effective Height of a column
Clause 3.8.3 : Deflection induced moments in solid slender columns
Column Dimension in Plane of Bending (About Y-Y Axis), Hyy = 400.0 mm
Column Dimension in Plane of Bending (About Z-Z Axis), Hzz = 400.0 mm
Section Data
Code of Practice : BS8110 : 1997
General Data
Concrete Area = 160000.0 mm²
Steel Bar Area = 904.8 mm²
Steel Ratio = 0.5655 %
Material Data
Concrete Test Specimen Type : Cube
Concrete Cube Strength, fcu = 30.0 N/mm²
Steel Yield Strength, fy = 460.0 N/mm²
Ultimate Strain of Concrete, εcu = 0.0035
Elastic Modulus of Concrete, Ec = 24597.0 N/mm²
Elastic Modulus of Steel, Es = 200000.0 N/mm ²
Partial Safety Factor of Material for Concrete, γc = 1.50
Partial Safety Factor of Material for Steel, γs = 1.05
Loading Data
Mx and My is taken with respect to the geometrical centroid of the section
Applied Axial Load = 210.0 kN
Applied Bending Moment about X-X Axis = -40.3 kNm
Applied Bending Moment about Y-Y Axis = 35.1 kNm
Design Status
Moment is taken at the plastic centroid
Axial Force(F) Applied = 210.04 kN
Axial Force(F) Capacity = 474.87 kN
Design Passed
Reinforcement provided: 8T12 (0.57%)
k value = 0.426
Note:
k value = √ ((AsReq) / (AsProv))
AsReq = Area of steel required (mm²)
AsProv = Area of steel provided (mm²)
Concrete contribution
Verification
Verification of the output results for the Axial Load Capacity
Contribution from concrete = 42934.69*0.447*30.0/1000 = 575.9 kN
Contribution from displaced concrete force = (113.1+113.1+113.1)*0.447*30.00/1000 =
4.55kN
Contribution from reinforcement bars = -96.10kN
Contribution from composite steel = 0.00kN
Total Axial load = 1.00*(575.89-4.55-96.10+0.00) = 475.23kN
Not all load cases within the limit specified in BS8110:Part1 Clause 3.8.4.6, Check for shear
and torsion is needed
Main Bar Diameter, diaMain = 12.0 mm, Link Diameter, diaLink = 10.0 mm, Link Spacing,
SvLink = 125.0 mm
Cover for Shear and Torsion Design from Concrete Surface to Main Bar Surface = 35 mm
Maximum Shear Stress Allowed, νMax = Min (0.8 × √30, 5) = 4.38 N/mm² - Clause 3.4.5.2
Shear Stress, νss = V × 1000 / (b × d) = 0.6 × 1000 / (400.0 × 359.0) = 0.00 N/mm² ≤ νMax
(4.38 N/mm²)
Checking for Maximum Shear Stress Allowed Pass
Maximum Shear Stress Allowed, νMax = Min (0.8 × √30, 5) = 4.38 N/mm² - Clause 3.4.5.2
Shear Stress, νss = V × 1000 / (b × d) = 15.7 × 1000 / (400.0 × 359.0) = 0.11 N/mm² ≤ νMax
(4.38 N/mm²)
Checking for Maximum Shear Stress Allowed Pass
iv. Pad
DESIGN RESULT
Pad Footing
Pad Footing self-weight Load = 1.82kN
Pad Footing self-weight moment X = 0.00kNm
Pad Footing self-weight moment Y = 0.00kNm
Total Loadings
Total load applied = 14.49kN
Total moment X applied =0.00kNm
Total moment Y applied =0.00kNm
Status:
Design Passed
Moment Checking
Clause 3.4.4.4 singly R.C. design(Reinforced Concrete Design, Mosley second edition, pp 62-
66)
Mx<=fcu*B*d²k'
My<=fcu*L*d²k'
k'=kk1/fcu
kk1=cb*k1*(1-cb*k2)
cb=limiting effective depth factor = 0.5
Mx and My are ultimate limit state moment
k1 = (0.45-0.15√fcu/17.86)fcu
k1 = [0.45-0.15*√30.00/17.86] 30.00 = 12.12
k2=1-0.45*fcu*(0.5-fcu/3828)/k1
k2=1-0.45*30.00*(0.5-30.00/3828)/12.12 = 0.45
kk1 = cb*k1*(1-cb*k2)
kk1 = 0.50*12.12*(1- 0.50*0.45) = 4.69
k'=kk1/fcu
k' = 4.69/30.00 = 0.156
fcu = min(40, max (25, fcu)) = min (40, max (25, 30)) = 30
Cut Area X = 550*176=96800mm²
Cut Area Y = 550*188=103400mm²
Average steel % = 100*(Steel Area X + Steel Area Y)/(Cut Area X+Cut Area
Y)=100*(452+452)/(96800+103400)=0.45
Effective steel percentage = Min(Average steel %, 3) = 0.45%
thickness = (176+188)/2=182
Inverted thickness = max(0.67,(400/thickness^(1/4)))
Inverted thickness = max(0.67, (400/(182))^(1/4) )= 1.22
Shearing capacity, vc = 0.79*0.45^(1/3)*1.22*(30/25.0)^(1/3)/1.25 = 0.63 N/mm^2
k = 0.20
The dimension of the critical section
B' = B + 2 × k × d
B' = 400 + 2 × 0.20 × 182.0 = 473 mm
L' = L + 2 × k × d
L' = 400 + 2 ×0.20 × 182.0 = 473 mm
Punching Shear Force = ρ × (total pad area - area inside critical perimeter)
Punching Shear Force = 58.6 × (0.303 - 0.473*0.473) = 4.631 kN
punching shear stress = 10^3 × 5/((2 × 473 + 2 × 473)*182)= 0.01 <= vc = 4.76 N/mm²
Punching Shear Pass!
With
As is the minimum steel ratio in the two directions, x and y
100*As/(b*d) should not be taken as greater than 3
(400/d)^1/4 should not be taken as less than 0.67
fcu should not be taken as greater than 40 or less than 25
The flexural shear is checked at 0.40d from column face at left portion of the cap
Enhanced shear multiplier, esm = 1.50
Enhanced shear factor = Max(esm/k,1) = Max(1.50/0.40,1) = 3.75
Enhanced shear capacity, vc' = 0.64 × 3.75 = 2.40 N/mm²
Flexural shear stress = 0 × 10³/(550*176) = 0.00 ≤ vc' = 2.40 N/mm²
Flexural Shear Checking Pass!
The flexural shear is checked at 0.40d from column face at right portion of the cap
Enhanced shear multiplier, esm = 1.50
Enhanced shear factor = Max(esm/k,1) = Max(1.50/0.40,1) = 3.75
Enhanced shear capacity, vc' = 0.64 × 3.75 = 2.40 N/mm²
Flexural shear stress = 0 × 10³/(550*176) = 0.00 ≤ vc' = 2.40 N/mm²
Flexural Shear Checking Pass!
The flexural shear is checked at 0.35d from column face at upper portion of the cap
Enhanced shear multiplier, esm = 1.50
Enhanced shear factor = Max(esm/k,1) = Max(1.50/0.35,1) = 4.29
Enhanced shear capacity, vc' = 0.62 × 4.29 = 2.64 N/mm²
Flexural shear stress = 0 × 10³/(550*188) = 0.00 ≤ vc' = 2.64 N/mm²
Flexural Shear Checking Pass!
The flexural shear is checked at 0.35d from column face at lower portion of the cap
Enhanced shear multiplier, esm = 1.50
Enhanced shear factor = Max(esm/k,1) = Max(1.50/0.35,1) = 4.29
Enhanced shear capacity, vc' = 0.62 × 4.29 = 2.64 N/mm²
Flexural shear stress = 0 × 10³/(550*188) = 0.00 ≤ vc' = 2.64 N/mm²
Flexural Shear Checking Pass!
6.0 Manual Calculation
Based on esteem outcomes, the design status of all beam are pass. We had decided G9
to verify. The size of beam at G9 is 250 x 500 mm. A few beams design has a provided
with warning an unstable or cantilever beam and need check by visual inspection of the
key plan and use own good engineering judgment.
7.0 Detailing
8.0 Conclusion
A beam calculation is made by manually to be compared with the result and analysis
gain from esteem 10 software. A continuous beam is selected to be calculated
manually. Based on the architectural drawing of the double story house, ground beam
9 was been chosen. In esteem 10 software, it found that the area reinforcement
required for each span of the beam is lower compared to the manual calculation. It
states that for span 1 with 3.3m length, it needs only 203 mm² meanwhile in manual
calculation it needs 212.03 mm². It found that it is same goes to the others span. Value
obtain from esteem 10 is lower compared to the value get from manual calculation. It
can conclude that by using esteem 10, the result gain more accurate compared to the
manual calculation. The accuracy is 99.56 % correct.
9.0 References
BOOK