MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employe: JESSA BETH R. MANGALLAY Name of Rater: ANGELINE A. BALANTIS

Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED TABUK CITY Date of Review: FEBRUARY 7, 2023
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
observer agreement forms done
Services and content within
through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
Pedagogy and across person classroom observation.
curriculum
teaching areas. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classes are not implemented,

• through observation of Efficiency

synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.
Timeliness
2. Used a range 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
of teaching (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
strategies that observer agreement forms
done through on-site/ face-to-
enhance learner
face/ in-person classroom
achievement in
observation.
literacy and
numeracy skills. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classes are not implemented, Efficiency

• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
 demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
session.

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
3. Applied a 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
range of (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
teaching observer agreement forms
done through on-site/ face-to-
strategies to
face/ in-person classroom
develop critical
observation.
and creative
thinking, as well If onsite/face-to-face/in-person Efficiency
as other higher- classes are not implemented,
order thinking
skills. • through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a Timeliness

demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
Services and structure to observer agreement forms
done through on-site/ face-to-
Diversity of engage
face/ in-person classroom
Learners learners,
observation.
individually or in
groups, in If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
meaningful classes are not implemented,
exploration, Efficiency
• through observation of
discovery and synchronous/asynchronous
hands-on teaching in other modalities; or
activities within
a range of • through observation of a
physical demonstration teaching* via
LAC session. Timeliness
learning
environments.

5. Managed 1. Classroom Observation Quality

 learner behavior Tool (COT) rating sheets or
constructively Inter-observer agreement
by applying forms done through on-site/
positive and face-to-face/ in-person
non-violent classroom observation. Efficiency
discipline to
ensure learning- If onsite/face-to-face/in-
focused person classes are not
environments. implemented,

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
• through observation of Timeliness
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.

6. Used 1. Classroom Observation Quality

differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheets or
developmentally Inter-observer agreement
appropriate forms done through on-site/
learning face-to-face/ in-person
experiences to classroom observation.
address If onsite/face-to-face/in-
learners’ person classes are not
gender, needs, implemented, Efficiency
strengths,
interests and • through observation of Timeliness
experiences. synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities;
or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 21% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Curriculum managed and Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services and implemented Inter-observer agreement
forms done through on-site/
Planning developmentally
face-to-face/ in-person
sequenced classroom observation.
teaching and
learning If onsite/face-to-face/in-
processes to person classes are not Efficiency
meet curriculum implemented,
requirements
and varied • through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching teaching in other modalities;
contexts. or

• though observation of a Timeliness

demonstration teaching* via
LAC

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
8. Participated 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
in collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner 2. Minutes of LAC sessions/
feedback to FGDs/ meetings/ other
enrich teaching collegial discussions on use
of teacher and learner
practice.
feedback to enrich teaching
practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their Efficiency
demonstration of teaching
practices following
participation from LAC Timeliness
sessions/ FGDs/ meetings/
other collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
 practice, with proofs of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
the objective

9. Selected, 1. Classroom Observation Quality

developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets or
organized and Inter-observer agreement
used forms done through on-site/
appropriate face-to-face/ in-person
teaching and classroom observation.
learning
resources, If onsite/face-to-face/in-
including ICT, to person classes are not Efficiency
address implemented,
learning goals. • through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities;
or

• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC
Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 21% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Assessment selected, Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services and Reporting organized and Inter-observer agreement
forms done through on-
used diagnostic,
site/ face-to-face/ in-person
formative and
classroom observation.
summative
assessment If onsite/face-to-face/in-
strategies person classes are not
consistent with implemented, Efficiency
curriculum
requirements. • through observation of
 synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or

• though observation of a
demonstration teaching*
Timeliness
via LAC
11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner following:
progress and
• Individual Learning
achievement using
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
learner attainment
data. • Peer assessment data
• Sample of learners’
outputs with reflection/ self-
assessment
• Progress charts/
anecdotal records
Efficiency
• Class/ e-class record/
grading sheets Timeliness
• Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
• Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills

• Any equivalent ALS form/

document that highlights
the

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
objective (e.g. Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)

• Others (please specify

and provide annotation)
 12. Communicated Any one (1) of the Quality
promptly and following:
clearly the • A sample of corrected
learners’ needs, test paper of a learner in a
progress and learning area with parent’s
achievement to or guardian’s signature and
key stakeholders, date of receipt
including
• Minutes of meetings with
parents/guardians. key stakeholders (e.g.
PTA, SGC, SPT, CPC)
with proof of attendance

• Report card with parent’s

or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by
minutes of meeting

• Communication with key Efficiency

stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co- Timeliness
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities

• Anecdotal records
showing entries per quarter

• Any equivalent ALS form/

document that highlights
the objective (e.g.
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)

• Other documents
showing learners’ needs,
progress and achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification

per Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Review
 Results
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 14% A reflection/ journal Quality
Education Growth and personal entry that highlights
Services Professional philosophy of the application of a Efficiency
Development teaching that is learner-centered
learner-centered. teaching philosophy in Timeliness
the lesson plan or
community work.
14. Set 1. Certification from Quality
professional the ICT Coordinator/
development School Head/ Focal
goals based on Person in charge of
the Philippine e-SAT Efficiency
Professional 2. IPCRF-DP
Standards for 3. Midyear Review
Teachers. Form (MRF) Timeliness
4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related
Services works/ activities • Committee
that contribute to involvement
the teaching- • Involvement as
learning process. module/ learning
material writer/
validator

• Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
facilitator in the RO/
SDO/ school-initiated Efficiency
TV/Radio-based
instruction

• Book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/
contributorship
 • Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
Performance
KRA Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Results
• Participation in
demonstration Timeliness
teaching

• Participation as
research presenter in
a forum/ conference

• Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers

• Conducted research
within the rating period

with annotation on
how it contributed to
the teaching-learning
process.

ANGELINE A. BALANTIS JESSA BETH R. MANGALLAY MELCHOR B. LANGBISAN

Rater Ratee Approving Authority