Ultrasonic Inspection of Weldolets, Weldoflanges and Sweepolets
Ultrasonic Inspection of Weldolets, Weldoflanges and Sweepolets
SPC ECHOPLUS
Andrey Bazulin,
Deputy commercial director, PhD
WELD DESIGN
WELD-O-LET, WELD-O-FLANGE
2
SWEEP-O-LET (INSERT WELDOLET)
3
UT CONSTRAINTS
• Access from the side of the nozzle is limited or absent: the
inspection technique from the side of the base pipe is not
described in GOST R 55724 and ISO 17640
• Inspection from the base pipe side with a large pipe thickness is
difficult (a large thickness and a decrease in signal amplitude
when reflected from the inner surface)
• With a small pipe diameter, it is possible to use a probe with
only a small shoe
• The changing geometry of the bevel greatly complicates the
interpretation of the results
• Inspection of welded joints from austenitic materials introduces
additional difficulties
4
PROPOSED TECHNIQUE
Produce the reference blocks made from each pipe type (with SDH or FBH)
and full scale blocks with hole for weldoled
5
Phased array inspections
6
FLEXIBILITY of Phased arrays
7
EXAMPLES
8
SWEEP-O-LET at 426 mm pipe
9
WELD-O-LET at 426 mm pipe
10
WELD-O-LET at 426 mm pipe
11
WELD-O-LET at 219 mm pipe
12
WELD-O-LET at pipe 826 mm
13
WELD-O-LET на трубе диаметром 826 мм
14
WELD-O-LET 1” на трубе диаметром 6” (150 мм)
15
PROBES AND WEDGES
16
ACOUSTIC COUPLING
17
SCANNERS
18
SUMMARY
It is possible to provide UT inspection of
weldolets, weldoflanges and sweepolets with use
of phased array (TFM) imaging for pipe diameter
6”+ (150+ mm), WT 10+ mm and nozzle thickness
10+ mm
Reliability of inspection is provided with
Visualization of object cross sections and
proper chose of the scan plan
Permanent record of the UT data
Building the 3D model and adjustment of the
UT data to the model, this assist to evaluate
indications
19
NEXT ACTIONS
20
Thank you for your attention