Disscusant Essay - Adani Ronit Rajiv
Disscusant Essay - Adani Ronit Rajiv
Group number- 1b
12222148
(Discussant for)Presenter group number- 10b
How Good Is Your Company at Change? A New System for Measuring (and
Improving) Your Ability to Adapt
Authors Michels and Murphy (2021) address the crucial issue of organizational adaptability
in their Harvard Business Review article titled "How good is your company at change: A new
system for measuring (and improving) your ability to adapt.". They contend that an
organization's capacity for adaptation is a crucial factor in determining its long-term success,
and they suggest a cutting-edge system for measuring and enhancing adaptability within
organizations.
The authors begin by highlighting the quickly changing business environment and stressing
how important it is for businesses to be adaptable and flexible. They point to a number of
unpredictability, as the reason why adaptability is becoming more and more important. Long-
term survival and success are more likely for businesses that can successfully navigate these
difficulties.
The Adaptability Quotient (AQ) model, developed by Michels and Murphy, is a thorough tool
for assessing an organization's capacity for change. AQ offers a holistic approach that
concentrate on financial indicators or market share. Four dimensions make up the AQ model:.
Cultural Adaptability: This factor evaluates how well an organization can promote a culture
that welcomes innovation, change, and learning. Open communication, a growth mindset, and
an empowered workforce that accepts new ideas and approaches are characteristics of a
Structural adaptability: This concept deals with how quickly an organization can change in
Resource adaptability measures how successfully an organization can reallocate its resources
in response to shifting conditions. Resources such as money, people, and technology are all
Strategic adaptability: Strategic adaptability is the ability of an organization to create and put
into practice efficient strategies to deal with changes in the business environment. This calls
for vision, preparation for various outcomes, and a readiness to accept calculated risks.
The authors suggest using surveys to gauge an organization's AQ. The survey gathers
management, and workers. The organization can determine its strengths and weaknesses in
each adaptability dimension and create specialized improvement strategies by analyzing the
responses.
The authors also stress the need for top-down leadership commitment in order to improve
adaptability. Leaders must set an example by encouraging a culture that values trying new
things and learning from mistakes. They must also develop an atmosphere that encourages
The article also discusses possible difficulties in assessing adaptability. One major issue is the
potential for bias in survey responses because people might be reluctant to admit their flaws
or failures. The authors propose anonymous surveying to lessen this and hiring outside
survive in a dynamic environment, according to the authors; it also produces a more engaged
Adani Ronit Rajiv
Group number- 1b
12222148
(Discussant for)Presenter group number- 10b
and motivated workforce. As their efforts to promote change are recognized and rewarded,
In conclusion, Michels and Murphy's article clarifies the crucial significance of adaptability
and pinpoint areas for improvement using the Adaptability Quotient (AQ) model they
fostering an adaptable culture, allocating resources efficiently, and creating agile strategies.
The article is a useful tool for executives and managers trying to improve their company's
(632 words)