0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views2 pages

COT1 RPMS Rating Sheet MAM BUATAG

This document is a teacher observation rating sheet that was used to evaluate Teacher Marife F. Buatag's classroom performance. It contains 9 indicators that were rated on a scale from 3 to 7 based on how well the teacher performed each item during the observation. The ratings were provided by Observer Lina T. Farinas for Teacher Buatag's 4th grade English Proficiency Program class. Space was also included for additional comments. Both the observer and teacher signed at the bottom to confirm the evaluation.

Uploaded by

marife buatag
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views2 pages

COT1 RPMS Rating Sheet MAM BUATAG

This document is a teacher observation rating sheet that was used to evaluate Teacher Marife F. Buatag's classroom performance. It contains 9 indicators that were rated on a scale from 3 to 7 based on how well the teacher performed each item during the observation. The ratings were provided by Observer Lina T. Farinas for Teacher Buatag's 4th grade English Proficiency Program class. Space was also included for additional comments. Both the observer and teacher signed at the bottom to confirm the evaluation.

Uploaded by

marife buatag
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

COT-RPMS

TEACHER I-III

RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: LINA T. FARIŇAS DATE: December 5, 2022,
2022
TEACHER OBSERVED: MARIFE F. BUATAG QUARTER:1 Quarter
st

SUBJECT & GRADE LEVEL TAUGHT: 4-EPP

OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVERS:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation. Mark the
appropriate column with a (✓) symbol.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis, regardless of its relationship to other indicators.
3. For schools with only one observer, this form will serve as the final rating sheet.

INDICATORS 3 4 5 6 7 NO*

1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.

2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in


literacy and numeracy skills.

3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking,


as well as other higher-order thinking skills.
4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery, and hands-on activities within a range of physical
learning environments.
5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-
violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments.

6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to


address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests, and experiences.

7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and


learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching
contexts.
8. Selected, developed, organized and used appropriate teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to address learning goals.

9. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative


assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements.
OTHER COMMENTS:

* NO stands for Not Observed which automatically gets a rating of 3.

LINA T. FARIŇAS MARIFE F. BUATAG


Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher

This tool was developed through the Philippine National


S.Y. 2022-2023 | Proficient Teacher Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support
from the Australian Government

You might also like