Scribd
Upload
21 views1 page

评分标准

1. The document outlines grading criteria for an assessment task involving formative and reflective work. 2. It provides five criteria: demonstration of understanding, quality of communication, application of theories, use of given information, and coverage of the question. 3. For each criterion, grades are defined on a scale from Fail to A, describing the expected level of performance for the criteria at each grade level.

Uploaded by

Zhang Grace
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views1 page

评分标准

1. The document outlines grading criteria for an assessment task involving formative and reflective work. 2. It provides five criteria: demonstration of understanding, quality of communication, application of theories, use of given information, and coverage of the question. 3. For each criterion, grades are defined on a scale from Fail to A, describing the expected level of performance for the criteria at each grade level.

Uploaded by

Zhang Grace
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Detailed Grading Criteria

Assessment Task 1: Formative and reflective tasks


Assessment Fail: less than 50% D: 50-59% C: 60-69% B: 70-79% A: 80-100%
criteria/grade
1. (KEY) Mostly Mostly Showing a fair Largely critical and Critical and
Demonstration of demonstrating only demonstrating only amount of deeper evaluative thinking, evaluative thinking
deeper surface knowledge surface knowledge understanding but but at times lacking throughout, creative
understanding of and rote learning. and rote learning. some surface necessary depth. and reflective
the material (incl. Not using own knowledge and rote Predominantly using processing of the
critical thinking and words. learning clearly own words. material. Using own
logical reasoning) visible, often using words.
own words.
2. Quality of Not sufficient to Good enough to Logical and relatively Logical with Logical with
communicating this make sense. make sense, but easy to follow most connections connections, good
understanding (incl. often lacking focus of the time. between different combination of big
structure and or coherence. themes made most picture and detail.
organisation) of the time.
3. Appropriate Largely lacking or Rather limited, some Relevant concepts Largely accurate, Accurate and
application of incorrectly applied. misunderstanding usually applied in an with little thorough.
theories & concepts present, and major appropriate way, but misunderstanding
(incl. problem omissions. still some omissions. and few omissions.
solving)
4. Use of given Mostly incorrect. Roughly equal spilt Correct in terms of Correct in terms of Correct in terms of
information between correct and most key and almost all key and all key issues and
incorrect. peripheral issues. most peripheral almost all peripheral
issues. issues.
5. The ‘coverage’ of Very few issues are More than half of Most issues are (Almost) all issues (Almost) all issues
the question addressed. the issues are at addressed, some are addressed, but are fully addressed
least partly fully and some some not fully.
addressed. partly.

You might also like