0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views1 page

Group Report Evaluation Rubric

The group report evaluation rubric assesses presentations on four criteria: content, organization, presentation, and collaboration. An excellent presentation contains valuable material that benefits the class. It is well organized and easy to follow. Presenters are very confident and engage the class. The group members contributed equally and built off each other's ideas.

Uploaded by

Lae Dee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views1 page

Group Report Evaluation Rubric

The group report evaluation rubric assesses presentations on four criteria: content, organization, presentation, and collaboration. An excellent presentation contains valuable material that benefits the class. It is well organized and easy to follow. Presenters are very confident and engage the class. The group members contributed equally and built off each other's ideas.

Uploaded by

Lae Dee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

GROUP REPORT EVALUATION RUBRIC

CRITERIA EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR


9-10 pts 7-8 pts 5-6 pts 4 pts
Content Presentation had Presentation had a Presentation had Presentation
an exceptional good amount of moments where contained little to
amount of material and valuable material no valuable
valuable material benefited the was present but as material.
and was extremely class. a whole content
beneficial to the was lacking.
class.
Organization The presentation The presentation There were The presentation
was well shows organization; IMs minimal signs of lacked
organized; well could organization or IM organization and
prepared and easy have been much preparation. had little evidence
to follow IMs. better with of IM preparation.
preparation.
Presentation Presenters were all Presenters seemed Presenters were Presenters were
very confident in confident with not consistent with unconfident and
delivery and they their presentation the level of demonstrated little
did an excellent however the confidence/ evidence of
job of engaging presentation was preparedness they planning prior to
the class. not as engaging as showed the presentation.
it could have been classroom but had
for the class. some strong
moments.
Collaboration The group mates The group mates The group mates The teammates
always worked worked from sometimes worked never worked
from others’ ideas. others’ ideas most from others’ ideas. from others’ ideas.
It was evident that of the time. And However, it seems It seems as though
all of the group it seems like everybody as though certain only a few people
members did some work, people did not do worked on the
contributed but some people as much work as presentation.
equally to the are carrying the others.
presentation. presentation.

You might also like