TBL Lin 2009
TBL Lin 2009
Paper Advisor
TASK-BASED APPROACH IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING IN CHINA
__________________
Presented to
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
__________________
Master of Science
in
Education
by
Zhu Lin
(Julia)
ii
ABSTRACT
Task-based approach is a foreign language teaching method which has been used since
teachers. It’s also a foreign language teaching method recommended by the Ministry of
Education in China.
Traditional teaching ideas and teaching modes once promoted in teaching foreign
language in China. They reflected a kind of restrictive, formalistic and passive teaching
mode. They emphasized the teachers’ leading role while ignoring learners’ motives and
purposes. Using the task-based approach, the teaching process is conducted with real life
carrying out the task. They exert their cognitive ability and use their existing target
language resource to perceive and practice the target language. They learn the target
The approach presented in this paper, which embodies advanced teaching idea, is an
task-based approach and its theoretical basis was conducted. A second review of
iii
was conducted. A third review on its advantages over traditional teaching methods was
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1
Statement of the Problem
Purpose of the Research
Significant of the Study
Assumptions
Delimitation of the Research
Methodology
Link to Theory
v
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Task-based approach is a teaching technique that involves classroom activities and the
understanding and application of the target language and interaction among learners. It
focuses on the meaning rather than the form of language and the task itself should be a
complete unit which can be related to fulfilling an independent social activity. The
use language in which they will get many opportunities to communicate in the target
language when they are trying to complete the task so as to acquire those language skills.
Task-based approach has been widely applied since the 1980s. It profits from theories
like Krashen’s second language acquisition, Vygotsky’s constructivism theory and many
advocates learning and training language knowledge and skills when completing tasks.
Teachers are no longer just initiators but guides, nor are learners just receivers but
principal agents. Through this approach, learners will learn how to make full use of their
provides an opportunity for them to learn together and mobilizes their potential abilities
Those real and natural tasks will undoubtedly stimulate learners’ knowledge acquired
before, and activate their cognitive pattern. Learners are constantly active and positive in
their learning during the task, thus they together form a favorable environment for
this way, learners naturally acquire the knowledge of English language and cultures and
Statement of Problem
The research addressed two essential problems related to the task-based approach to
(ii) what is the relationship between task and learners’ learning achievements.
There is much evidence to show that task-based approach plays a very important role in
foreign language teaching and learning. The objective in this paper is to find out its
theoretical basis. The other objective is to explain how it works in foreign language
Experts and scholars have been looking for an effective teaching approach, which can
make learners learn during communication in foreign language classrooms for years,
even for centuries. Task-based approach seems to satisfy this need to the greatest extent
possible. The purpose of this paper is to give foreign language teachers a vivid picture by
explaining what task-based approach is, how it works and its benefits.
Educators believe that using appropriate teaching approaches is the best way to convey
knowledge. People have dedicated time, money and energy to seek better ways to make
language learning more interesting and more efficient. Task-based approach was
researched and reported in this paper to inform people of a better way to teach and learn
foreign languages.
Assumptions
For the purpose of this paper, it is assumed that all research and review of the current
literature of task-based approach was accurately reported. It is also assumed that the
literature of task-based approach will make recommendations on how best to use the
research available.
4
The research was conducted at the YWICC Library in Yiwu Industrial and Commercial
sixty (60) days. Primary searches were conducted using the Internet and EBSCO host
with ERIC and Academic Search Elite as the primary sources. Searches were also
conducted using the Internet through Googlescholar. Key search topics were “task-based
Method of Approach
A brief review of the literature on task-based approach and its theoretical basis was
Language (ESL) classrooms was conducted. A third review on its advantages over
traditional teaching methods was conducted. A discussion on how to design a good task
was developed. The findings were summarized and recommendations were made.
Link of Theory
Task-based approach benefits from theories like Krashen’s second language acquisition,
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Task-based approach is a teaching approach which uses tasks as its core programs to
organize language teaching. Its advocate presented the idea that task-based approach is
the logical extension of Communication Linguistics because they share similar principles
in teaching. For example, they both agree that activities for real communication are of
most importance in language learning; they both agree that using language to complete
meaningful tasks can promote language learning; they both agree that the language which
language knowledge and training skills in the process of completing tasks. Teachers are
no longer just instructors but also guides, nor are learners just receivers but also principal
agents. Through this approach, learners will learn how to make full use of their own
provides an opportunity for them to learn together and mobilizes their potential abilities
Task-based approach in second language teaching was first carried out by Prabhu, who
published the Bangolore research report in 1982 and developed the concept of task-based
from language research, the research of language learning and the research of foreign
language acquisition, and it is becoming more and more mature together with them. Its
developing learners’ ability to use the target language and solve communicative problems
were highly appreciated and recognized by experts and scholars in the field of language
teaching.
Since the 1980s, task-based approach has attracted more and more attention in the foreign
language both in speaking and writing through learning activities which are designed to
engage learners in the authentic, practical and functional use of language for meaningful
purpose.
Brown (1994) referred to task-based approach as a series of tasks which directly serve
and connect with teaching purpose transcending merely practicing language for language.
It is the core of task-based approach to complete a real and meaningful task through the
common effort of both teachers and learners (Willis, 1996). Therefore, learners learn the
language skills naturally rather than take language as fragments and practice some
communicative approach is that they both give top priority to fostering learners’
Traditional foreign language teaching approaches in China place too much emphasis on
instruction; pay too much attention to explaining language forms. All the practices focus
consists of only one task; all the classroom activities center on the task and serve the task.
As a teaching approach, it is not persuasive when it only stops at the theoretical level; the
key issue is the way teachers put it into practice. So far, the research of practicing
task-based approach has been best represented by Skehan (1998) and Willis (1996) who
both agreed on the key issue and fully suggest the idea of using task-based approach in
teaching. Now, I am going to take Willis’s framework as an example to talk about the
Generally speaking, Willis’s (1996) teaching framework can be divided into the
following three stages: pre-task, task cycle and language focus. Willis put language focus
in the last stage, which is totally different from traditional language teaching process.
Communicative tasks which involve the four basic language skills of listening, speaking,
reading and writing are the center of the whole teaching framework. Learners start with
experiencing the practice of language, and end with reviewing the rules of language.
1. Pre-task: Topics and tasks are introduced in pre-task stage. Teachers introduce tasks to
learners (Willis, 1996). They present necessary knowledge, explain the requirements and
procedures of the task in details and help familiarize them with the topic, vocabulary and
expressions. In this stage, teachers should take the individual differences among learners
into account.
2. Task cycle: Task cycle can be divided into three parts: task, planning and report
(Willis, 1996).
i) Task. In this part, learners are given plenty of chances to express their ideas in target
groups. Teachers supervise the process without interrupting their speech and correcting
their errors so that the learners feel safe to express themselves freely. Teachers should
9
help learners gain confidence in language learning. Emphasis lays on communication not
accuracy of language.
ii) Planning. This part is the preparation for report. Each group is getting ready to show
classmates their process and achievements of the task. Since learners have to report
publicly, emphasis of language naturally transfers from fluency to accuracy. In this part,
iii) Report. Several learners report to the class while other learners should listen carefully
and compare those reports. In this way, all the learners are involved. At last, teachers
Learners master the language by using it communicatively in the classroom, and they still
have to learn grammar and memorize vocabulary. Teachers lead learners’ attention to
language forms. Some exercises are necessary to consolidate the learnt knowledge and
i) Analysis. The purpose in this part is to help learners explore the usage of language,
become aware of syntax, phrase arrangements and vocabulary etc.; and help them to
systemize the language features they observed in learning process, so as to discover new
language knowledge.
10
ii) Practice. It is necessary for learners to do some exercises under the guide of teachers.
This part makes the whole teaching procedure be accepted by learners more easily. It also
Compare to traditional teaching methods, task-based approach can give learners better
initiative and make them more active in class. In traditional English teaching process, the
contents and outcomes of teaching are completely controlled by teachers. There is no real
language environment and meaningful communication. Learners can just passively learn
some isolated grammar rules or expressions and can’t use the target language to
communicate and express their feelings and thoughts freely. On the contrary, in
task-based approach, teachers design some familiar activities in everyday life to create
real or relatively real language environment to stimulate learners’ interests and teach
highlights its feature of the Chinese saying “learning is to use”. It is an effective teaching
method whose tasks can improve the structure of classroom teaching, propel learners to
learn and to utilize English in activities and help learners get together to cooperate and
experience the success and joy in English learning. Its advantages are as follows:
1. Task-based approach shortens the distance between teaching contents and everyday
life. The ultimate goal of language teaching is to make learners fulfill the communicative
11
purposes in the target language in everyday life. Traditional English teaching seldom
involves itself in daily practice in the real society. Thus learners are trained to be “dumb”
English learners, who has been learning English for years but can’t communicate in
everyday life. While task-based approach is exactly designed for this ultimate goal. It
emphasizes the combination of language learning in class and activities out of class so as
learners are inspired to apply and share their existing experience together. Meanwhile, it
transfers the teacher-centered teaching mode to a mode which emphasizes the input of
CHAPTER 3
DISCUSSION
There are a lot of definitions for the word “task”. First of all, according to the Modern
Chinese Dictionary, “tasks” are the assignments one gets, or the responsibilities one has
to do. Long (1985, p89) defines “tasks” as “a piece of work undertaken for oneself or for
others, freely or for some reward. Thus, examples of tasks including painting a fence,
dressing a child, filling out a form, buying a pair of shoes, making an airline reservation,
borrowing a library book, taking a driving test, typing a letter, weighing a patient, sorting
letters, taking a hotel reservation, writing a check, finding a street destination and helping
someone across a road. In other words, by ‘task’ we mean the hundred and one things
people do in everyday life, at work, at play and in between. Tasks are things that people
will tell you they do if you ask them and they are not linguists.” Prabhu (1987, p24) said
that a task is “an activity which require[s] learners to arrive at an outcome from given
information through some process of thought, and which allow[s] teachers to control and
regulate that process.” But in foreign language teaching, especially when we refer to
task-based approach, “tasks” always mean activities which make reference to real life and
can form language meanings. In Nunan’s (1989, p15) opinion, a “task” is “a piece of
interacting in the target language; while their attention is principally focused on the
meaning rather than the form. The task should have a sense of completeness, being also
to stand alone as a communicative act in its own right.” Breen (1987, p23) thought that a
“task” is “… any structured language learning endeavor which has a particular objective,
appropriate content, a specified working procedure, and a range of outcomes for those
who undertake the task.” He considered all the classroom activities that are helpful to
achieve the language learning goals as tasks, including those small grammar exercises or
complicated time-consuming activities. Richards et al (2000, p468) hold the opinion that
a task is “…an activity which is designed to help achieve a particular goal.” Their
definition also mentioned that a number of dimensions of tasks influence their use in
language teaching, such as goals, procedures, pacing, learning strategy and many others.
which lays much importance on language learning behaviors and language meanings.
Breen’s definition gives prominence to the goal, content, procedures and result of tasks.
Richards et al put the goal of a task in the first place, and endue the task with features of
communicative tasks in the real world. Many definitions can be summarized from the
above review. Tasks are a series of correlative and purposeful activities in which learners
achieving goals with the target language as they do in the real world. “Task” in
activities. It can not be used and combined at random. “Task” is an essential part of the
14
whole course that leads to fluency in speaking the target language. It is also the process in
which learners solve simulative or real-world problems with the target language. It can
help learners acquire language knowledge and develop their comprehensive abilities in
solving problems.
The tasks in task-based approach are similar to the tasks in real life in many aspects.
According to the differences or the similarities of the tasks, Nunan divides tasks into two
categories: “real-world tasks or target tasks” and “pedagogical tasks” (1989, p40-41). As
you can see from these names, the tasks in real world are designed for daily life usage
that aim to improve the learners’ abilities to fulfill similar tasks in real life while the
teaching tasks do not always directly reflect the concert tasks in daily life. They involve
the theories and practices of second language acquisition and are applied in certain
teaching situations only. Pedagogical tasks are derived from the tasks in real life; and
could be sub-tasks in real life. They also involve exercises in language skills. Pedagogical
tasks are not apparently similar to the real life and mainly apply to class teaching.
Teachers should select real life tasks subject to learners’ practical needs concerning the
purpose for which learners use the target language. The design of the pedagogical tasks
During the process of task-based approach to learning the design of a task is very
important. Nunan (1989) describes the task as a piece of classroom work which involves
convey meaning rather than to manipulate form. When designing a task, teachers should
consider learners’ cognitive abilities, age, psychological features, interests and cultural
should be considered. Just as Eva Lai (2003) concluded that a good task should have:
iii) learners’ participation. All learners will think and participate in the whole
teaching process;
iv) well-defined outcomes. This makes learners complete tasks with certain purposes
v) require some background knowledge and basic language skills. It is a process that
learners have to constantly use their acquired background knowledge and skills.
Besides the five essential elements for a good task Eva Lai mentions above, difficulty is
difficulty as a precondition for any task work (Skehan, 1998, p134).” If a task is so
difficult that learners will lose confidence and motivation in the communicative process,
they will fail to achieve the teaching objective. Equally, a good task should not be too
easy. Learners will be bored when performing a task that is too easy and not challenging.
They will not be seriously engaged in performing the task. Therefore, they will learn
nothing in such a teaching process. Just as Skehan (1996) said, we should give learners
In the teaching process of task-based approach, it is necessary for teachers to have a clear
idea of the elements that influence the difficulty of tasks, which enable them to design
and learners’ abilities. If the task is too hard, the learners will be intimidated and lose
interest in the learning and self-confidence. This will result in failure and the teaching
objectives will not be met. If the task is too easy, it will not be challenging and may not
fully attract the learners’ attention in carrying out the task, which means inferior outcome
in teaching and the possibility of learners’ getting bored in class. From a good teaching
point of view, the factors that have a close link with the difficulty of the tasks are
teaching objectives, teaching materials, teaching activities, teachers’ role and the class
environment.
17
teachers are designing the tasks, they must make sure that the tasks are intended to help
the learners acquire certain knowledge or language skills. There are two main objectives
learning is to perform the task; the other purpose of the teaching using the task-approach
is to learn the skills and knowledge involved in carrying out the task. For example, when
we are designing a task for learning telephone dialogues, the objective of the task is to
learn how to leave a message while making the telephone call. The teaching objective is
to help the learner make use of the communication in the course of fulfilling the task to
strengthen the awareness of the language, improve communication ability and use
expressions in the target language such as: May I speak to… or Hold on, please. Teachers
pay more attention to finding out if the teaching objective has been met because it is
2. Learning materials. Learners directly use a variety of learning materials. The content
and types of the materials attract learners’ attention and demand various learning or
performance efforts from the learners. Different materials will result in different amount
of effort that the learner will make or make the task become more difficult or easier. It is
much better to provide instructions, accompanied by news reports or pictures and graphs
3. Teaching activities. Teaching activities refer to the way in which learners become
involve with the learning materials. They must be designed in line with the teaching
purpose and simulate real life problems that the learners might come across. They must
have an authentic context that can provoke students’ interests. If the activities are not so
real, learners may lose initiative and concentration. Teaching activities should be selected
4. Teachers’ role. In the course of fulfilling the task, teachers should not only be
supervisors and instructors but also be participants who provide learners with
decrease the difficulty of the tasks. If teachers only show up as observers or judges, the
difficulty of the tasks maybe more frustrating for the learners. The designer of tasks could
also assign teachers and learners specific roles to help them to fulfill the tasks more
which the tasks are originated and fulfilled. Teaching tasks are mainly carried out in the
classrooms. Familiar environment could help learners focus on the tasks. If teachers use
multi-media facilities to set the context or background related to the tasks, the difficulty
19
could be reduced. If the learners are in a strange environment without any auxiliary
All factors mentioned above can affect the difficulty of the tasks directly or indirectly.
Teachers should have a clear idea about how these factors work so as to manipulate the
factors to adjust the difficulty of the tasks to fit different learners’ levels of language
abilities.
Task-based approach has changed traditional ways of language learning and teaching
from direct presentation and explanation of language rules turning out passive learners
into more task-oriented and active learners. It creates a favorable environment for
learners to think about how and why the task should be done in this way and to analyze
and summarize what they have in the course of fulfilling the task. When applying
teaching based on real tasks, teachers should design effective tasks according to learners’
approach differs from other teaching modes. In task-based activities, teachers should be
organizers and instructors who provide learners methods and skills of learning, plenty of
opportunities and time to practice by themselves and who also organize and control the
class or learning environment. Only when learners are involved in the task and think
20
actively, can they have the opportunities to use the target language in different situations,
to enhance their understanding of the language. They also recognize the nature of the
language and know better how to use the target language in real life. Learners will be
active learners only when they are the center of all teaching circumstances and endowed
with chances to perform and improve their communication skills. Also, active learners
2. Design real tasks. Tasks should be realistic in three aspects: first, the designer of the
task should choose language and expressions used in daily life communication, selecting
the plot and background of the task from real life. Secondly, the circumstances involving
the task should enable learners to experience and practice real language skills. Thirdly,
Tasks could be relatively real but teachers should try to create tasks as real as possible to
provide learners with substantial unrefined language and information so as to get them
3. Design tasks of proper difficulty level. It must be noted that the tasks should not be too
easy or too hard. If the tasks are too easy, learners will lose interest because of the lack of
challenge; if they are too hard, the learners will be intimidated and lose interest and
confidence, which will result in learners’ negative attitude in the learning process.
21
Teachers should design tasks of proper difficulty level according to learners’ language
Mechanical and repetitive tasks would deprive learners of their interest to participate in
performing the task and will result in the lost of learners’ initiatives. Teachers should
design varying, interesting and challenging tasks that stimulate the learners’ desire to
learn.
22
CHAPTER 4
Many instructional methods are available in second language teaching and each of them
has its strengths and weaknesses. In China, for over 200 years of second language
teaching, people have been using receptive methods. These methods are teacher-centered,
and stress on language grammar and vocabulary, as main objectives of language learning.
The main objectives of learning a language should not be that of just learning the rules
The task-based approach, which is not widely used in all levels of English teaching in
China, especially in junior and senior high schools, overcomes the weakness mentioned
reference for current foreign language teaching in China, educators still need to think
about how to integrate this approach into the practical situation in China so as to give full
The task-based approach embodies a new concept in language teaching. The purpose of
teaching is not to help learners reach scheduled targets but to offer them the environment
and conditions in which language acquisition can take place. The teachers’ roles have
23
supervisors, and supporters of the learning activities. Learners are the subjects in the
class, which means they are the main players in the learning process. They are no longer
empty vessels to be filled by the teachers but torches to be lit through providing good
Task-based approach has closed the distance between class and real life and has changed
teaching from real life. Task-based approach helps learners spontaneously acquire
language skills and trains learners’ ability to solve problems in real life.
But the task-based approach also has limits in some aspects if not properly used. Firstly,
some tasks are randomly selected. The way of choosing tasks should be clearly stated in
task-based syllabus, but so far all examples we have are those applied in Prabhu’s
“Bangolore experiment” in 1980s, which is too old to be instructive and cannot achieve
the anticipated teaching goals. Secondly, in most schools in China, learners cannot get
learners’ experiences are too limited to put to effects the concept of helping learners
master the language systematically through their experiences of the language. Thirdly,
language teaching in China is carried out in classes with over 30, and sometimes, even 40
learners, which makes it very difficult to organize activities of good quality. The
24
learners, teachers should design the class from the learners’ points of view and deal with
the learners’ problems when they come across in fulfilling the tasks. These approaches
set up higher standards for the teachers’ language levels and abilities to deal with
emergencies and to keep the class on task. At present, the proficiency level of language
teachers in China has been improved but most of them have not received specific training
for implementing task-based approach, which will extensively affect the quality of
In reference to authority in language teaching, Richard and Rogers (2001) expressed that
there are still many aspects of task-based approach to be verified. Such as task model,
task assessment and others. The point of view that task-based approach is better than
other methods is still an assumption and not a fact. The introduction of task-based
approach has brought more reference to traditional foreign language teaching methods,
but educators must note that there are many more differences in the environment and
conditions of language teaching and learning between the east and the west. Educators in
China should not imitate the form of the task-based approach but focus on its essence,
REFERENCES
Brown, H. D. (1994) Teaching by Principles. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Regents.
Breen, M.P. (1987) Learner Contributions to Task Design. In Candlin, Christopher, and
Long, M. (1985a) Input and Second Language Acquisition Theory. In Gass and Madden.
Prabhu, N.S. (1982) The Communicational Project, South India. Madras: The British
Council (mimeograph)
Richards & Rogers (2001) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge
University Press
University Publisher.
Willis, J. (1996) Flexible Framework for Task-based Language Learning in Wills, J. &
Limited, UK.