0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views

Geotechnical Write Up - 21.05.2019

The soil at the project site consists primarily of soft silt/clay in the upper 8 meters underlain by stiffer silt/clay to depths of around 30 meters. Peat layers between 1 to 4 meters thick were found at some locations. Deeper boreholes encountered weathered mudstone/shale bedrock from around 30 meters depth. Laboratory testing showed the soils have high moisture contents in the upper 15 meters and are predominantly low plastic silts and clays. The strength of the soils increases with depth as indicated by higher SPT N-values. The compression properties of the soils are also summarized.

Uploaded by

Wan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views

Geotechnical Write Up - 21.05.2019

The soil at the project site consists primarily of soft silt/clay in the upper 8 meters underlain by stiffer silt/clay to depths of around 30 meters. Peat layers between 1 to 4 meters thick were found at some locations. Deeper boreholes encountered weathered mudstone/shale bedrock from around 30 meters depth. Laboratory testing showed the soils have high moisture contents in the upper 15 meters and are predominantly low plastic silts and clays. The strength of the soils increases with depth as indicated by higher SPT N-values. The compression properties of the soils are also summarized.

Uploaded by

Wan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 197

1.

0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN

1.1 Ground Condition

The soil investigation (SI) works carried out by the SI Contractor, Geospec Sdn. Bhd. include
a total of 22 nos. of Boreholes (BHs), 17 nos. of Mackintosh Probe (MP) Tests and 17 nos. of
Hand Augering (HA). In addition, 3 nos. of river boreholes (WBHs) were also sunk at the exact
position of the bridge piers.. The Soil Investigation Plan is shown in Appendix A.

In general, the project area covering from the proposed Batang Rajang bridge to the Sarikei-
Bintangor T-junction mainly is underlain by a layer of soft SILT/CLAY with average thickness
of 8.2m. There are 3 boreholes, i.e. BBH5, BBH6 and DBH6 picked up 2.5m thick, 1.2m thick
and 1.0m thick of PEAT at the uppermost layer respectively. The underlying firm to stiff
SILT/CLAY has average thickness of 5.4m . SAND is occasionally found interbedded with
SILT/CLAY. Hard CLAY or very dense SAND was encountered at varying depths, i.e.
shallowest at 8.2m and deepest at 29.5m below ground level.
From the proposed Batang Rajang bridge towards the roundabout which leads to Tanjung
Manis and Sibu, the upper layer generally shows presence of soft CLAY/SILT or/and loose
SAND with average thickness of 6.8m and 5.4m respectively. The maximum thickness
intersected for soft CLAY/SILT is 10.3m below ground level. A 1.5m thick soft PEAT was
encountered underlying the soft SILT at 3.0m below ground level as shown by DBH5. On the
other hand, two boreholes PBH4 and DBH3 show uppermost layer consisting of very soft
PEAT with thickness of 4.0m and 2.0m respectively. The underlying firm to stiff SILT/CLAY
has average thickness of 7.4m. At depth of 13.0m below ground level, borehole PBH4
intersected a 3.0m thick layer of decayed wood overlying a 3.0m thick layer of firm to stiff
SILT. Dense to very dense SAND were encountered for every borehole drilled which shows
an average thickness of 17.1m. Hard CLAY or very dense SAND was encountered at depth
16.5m to 29.5m below ground level. Some boreholes were terminated before the hard or very
dense layer was encountered, especially for boreholes near the proposed roundabout because
the maximum depth for the road borehole is 30m.
The river boreholes (WBH1, WBH2 & WBH3) in overall encountered deeper depth of
dense/hard soil underlain by weathered rocks (MUDSTONE/SHALE) in the direction heading
towards Sibu/Tanjung Manis.
WBH1 shows 7.5m loose SAND followed by 43.0m thick alternating layers of firm and stiff
SILT/CLAY and a 3.0m thick layer of medium dense GRAVEL at depth of 43.0m below
ground level. 9.9m thick dense SAND was intersected following the firm to stiff ground before
encountering weathered SHALE at depth of 63.4m below ground level.
WBH2 shows 10.0m thick loose SAND followed by 3.0m thick medium dense SAND. The
medium dense SAND is underlain by 30.0m thick firm to stiff SILT before intersecting 0.7m
thick hard SILT. Weathered SHALE was encountered at depth of 43.7m below ground level.
WBH3 shows 4.5m thick very soft SILT underlain by 5.5m thick loose SAND. This is followed
by 3.0m thick medium dense SAND and 3.0m thick stiff SILT before intersecting hard ground
consisting of SILT/CLAY at depth of 16.0m below ground level. Weathered MUDSTONE was
later encountered at depth of 31.5m below ground level.
In reference to the existing river borehole investigation conducted earlier at the proposed bridge
location at the Batang Rajang, both of the river boreholes (EBH3 & EBH4) show a 2.5m thick
layer of soft SILT from the original ground level. The underlying loose SAND is approximate
7.5m thick on average, followed by medium dense SAND of average 2.3m thick. Alternative
layers of firm CLAY and stiff CLAY were intersected before reaching hard SILT at depth of
29.5m and 19.0m below ground level for EBH3 and EBH4 respectively.

1.2 Soil Properties

Field and laboratory testing were carried out and the properties of soil sample are summarised
in the following sub sections.

1.2.1 Strength

The strength profile as measured by SPT-N values is shown in Figure 1.1. The soil strength
generally increases with depth. Soil with SPT N-value 50 or greater (hard layer) was
encountered ranging from 8m to 48m below existing ground depending on the boreholes.
DEPTH (m) v SPT (N)
0 10 20 SPT (N) 30 40 50
0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0
DEPTH (m)

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0
BBH1 BBH2 BBH3 BBH4 BBH5 BBH6
DBH1 DBH2 DBH3 DBH4 DBH5 DBH6
DBH7 PBH1 PBH2 PBH3 PBH4 PBH5
PBH6 PBH7 RBH1 RBH2 WBH1 WBH2
WBH3 EBH1

Figure 1.1: Depth versus SPT-N Value

1.2.2 Moisture Content

Based on Figure 1.2, the laboratory test results show the average moisture content for the soil
in the first 15m depth is approximately 58.82% while it is 26.49% for the soil beyond 15m.
The moisture content of the soil in the first 15m tends to be on the high side due to high
percentage of organic matter. In addition, peat sample contains moisture content as high as
699.03%, so it is excluded from the plotting.

MOISTURE CONTENT
AVERAGE MC PERCENTAGES %
0 <15m, 58.82 100 200
0
5
10
15
20
25
DEPTH, m

30
35
40
45
50
55 AVERAGE MC
60 >15m, 26.49
65

Figure 1.2: Depth versus Moisture Content


1.2.3 Atterberg Limit

The properties of clay/silt are tabulated in Error! Reference source not found.. The plasticity
chart of the soil is shown in Figure 1.3. Majority of the soil samples fall in the silt region with
intermediate to high plasticity.

Table 1.1: Atterberg Limit

Atterberg Limit Range (%) Average (%)

Moisture Content 11.93 – 185.03 Refer to Figure 1.2

Liquid Limit 32.00 - 149.00 75.21

Plastic Limit 17.00 - 89.00 41.36

Plasticity Index 13.00 - 73.00 33.81

PLASTICITY CHART
80

70

CE
60

CV
50
Plasticity Index (%)

ME

40
CH

30
CI
MV
20
CL
MH
10 MI

ML
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Liquid Limit (%)

Figure 1.3: Plasticity Chart


1.2.4 Particle Size Distribution

The particle size distribution plot of the soil samples is shown in Figure 1.4Error! Reference
source not found.. From the plot, the soil on site consists of a mixture of CLAY, SILT, SAND
and GRAVEL with average contents of 16.47%, 39.67%, 42.72% and 0.92% respectively.

DEPTH vs PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

PERCENTAGE %
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0

10

20
DEPTH, m

30

40

50

60

70
SAND GRAVEL SILT CLAY

Figure 1.4 : Particle Size Distribution of Soil Samples

1.2.5 Water Table

In general, the water table logged in the borehole logs ranges from 0m to 3.4m below existing
ground level. It should be noted that BBH2 shows the water level at 10.5m which is considered
low, thus it will be ignored due to error when taking the reading.
1.2.6 Compression Index (Cc) & Recompression Index (Cr)

The plots for the compression index, Cc and recompression index, Cr are shown in Figure 1.5.
It can be seen that the compression index ranges from 0.18 to 0.74 with average value of 0.57
and the recompression index ranges from 0.02 to 0.12 with average value of 0.07.

Cc , Cr vs Depth
Cc , Cr
0 0.25 0.5 0.75
0
Cr, Average, 0.07 Cc, Average, 0.57

2.5

5 Cc
Depth

7.5
Cr
10

12.5

15

Figure 1.5 : Cc, Cr against Depth

1.2.7 Preconsolidation Stress

The preconsolidation stress for all boreholes is plotted and shown in Figure 1.6. It can be seen
that the Pc ranges between 67kN/m2 to 119kN/m2.
Pc vs Depth
60 70 Pc (kN/m2) 80 90
0
BBH3
2.5 BBH4
BBH5
5 BBH6
Depth

DBH1
7.5
DBH2
DBH6
10
PBH1
PBH7
12.5
RBH1
RBH1
15

Figure 1.6 : Preconsolidation Stress against depth

1.2.8 pH Value

The pH of the ground water collected is plotted in Figure 1.7. The water samples from the
boreholes show quite consistent pH values except for WBH3 being in the river. Higher pH of
WBH3 could be taken during the high tide due to backflow of seawater.

pH VALUES
8

7.5

7
pH

6.5

6
Average pH, 6.3

5.5

5
BBH1 BBH3 BBH4 BBH5 DBH1 DBH2 DBH4 DBH5 DBH6 DBH7 PBH2 PBH3 PBH5 PBH6 PBH7 RBH1 WBH3
Borehole

Figure 1.7 : pH Value versus Borehole


1.2.9 Water Sample Quality

Referring to Figure 1.8, it can be seen that the chloride content in the ground water is less than
0.5 g/l. Therefore, the chloride content is considered as insignificant. Reinforcement exposed
to high concentrations of chlorides may be subjected to an undesirable level of deterioration
with time. Table 1.2 below provides a correlation of the corrosion potential of steel.
Table 1.2 Corrosion Potential of Steel Reinforcement

Chloride Content (%) pH Corrosion Potential


0 – 4.5 Very High
> 0.05 4.5 – 5.5 High
< 0.05 5.5 – 6.5 Moderate
> 6.5 Mild
Note: Conversion of g/L to % is by multiplying the former with 0.1

For the durability of the concrete, long term exposure to injurious concentration of sulphates
may subject it to an undesirable level of deterioration with time. The results from the laboratory
tests indicates that the average sulphate content is 0.004 g/l for the samples. Therefore, there is
no special grade of concrete is required in the design as per Clause 5.3.4, BS5328, Part 1
(1997)- Sulphate Class 1.
However as the bridge crossing location is subjected to saline intrusion, concrete with Silica
Fume is proposed to be used in the bridge construction.

Water Sample Quality


0.008
0.007
0.006
Content (g/L)

0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
BBH1 BBH3 BBH4 BBH5 DBH1 DBH2 DBH4 DBH5 DBH6 DBH7 PBH2 PBH3 PBH5 PBH6 PBH7 RBH1
Water Sample

Sulphate Chloride

Figure 1.8 : Water Sample Quality Plot


1.3 General Description of Treatment Types

The different treatment types which involves unsuitable soil removal, surcharge, PVD,
geotextile reinforcement and stabilizing berm are summarized in Table 1.3 and Table 1.4.
Typical drawings for all treatment types are presented in Appendix D.

Table 1.3 Proposed Ground Treatment Type A

TYPE A (without surcharge)

Treatment Type Description

 Minimum 1m of soil replacement


A1  1 layer of reinforcement geotextile with short term tensile
strength of 200kN/m

Table 1.4 Proposed Ground Treatment Type B

TYPE B (with 0.5m surcharge for 9 months with PVD)

Treatment Type Description

 Minimum 1m of soil replacement


B1  8m wide stabilizing berm
 0.5m surcharge for 9 months with PVD

 Minimum 1m of soil replacement


 1 layer of reinforcement geotextile with short term tensile
B2 strength of 200kN/m
 8m wide stabilizing berm
 0.5m surcharge for 9 months with PVD

 Minimum 1m of soil replacement


 1 layer of reinforcement geotextile with short term tensile
B3 strength of 400kN/m
 8m wide stabilizing berm
 0.5m surcharge for 9 months with PVD
 Minimum 1m of soil replacement
 1 layer of reinforcement geotextile with short term tensile
strength of 200kN/m
B4  1 layer of reinforcement geotextile with short term tensile
strength of 400kN/m
 8m wide stabilizing berm
 0.5m surcharge for 9 months with PVD

 Minimum 1m of soil replacement


 2 layers of reinforcement geotextile with short term tensile
B5 strength of 400kN/m
 8m wide stabilizing berm
 0.5m surcharge for 9 months with PVD

The proposed treatment schedule is summarized in Table 1.5.


Table 1.5 : Ground Treatment Schedule

GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE FOR MAIN ROAD

CHAINAGE VIBRATING WIRE


REDUCED LEVEL FOR ROAD SETTLEMENT INCLINOMETER (IM) MAX. PVD DEPTH
TREATMENT LENGTH (m) TREATMENT TYPE PIEZOMETER (VMP) REMARKS
STABILISING BERM (m) GAUGE (RSG) (MAX. 20m) OF 'N' (m)
FROM TO (MAX. 20m)

0 1225 1225 -
1m SAND REPLACEMENT
1225 1325 100 3.20 1 1 1

NO SAND REPLACEMENT IS REQUIRED AT WHERE THE


B1
EXISTING ROAD PAVEMENT IS. 1m SAND REPLACEMENT TO
1325 1400 75 3.30 1 1 1 BE CARRIED OUT AT AREA OUTSIDE THE EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
9
EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE SCRAPPED IF PVD INSTALLATION
IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE GROUND TREATMENT
1400 1550 150 3.50 1 1 1
B3
1550 1825 275 3.60 1 1 1

1825 2075 250 B1 3.20 1 1 1 1m SAND REPLACEMENT

2075 3475 1400 - 1 -

3475 3850 375 A1 - - 1 -

3850 3975 125 B1 3.10 1 1 1


7 2m SAND REPLACEMENT
3975 4125 150 3.00 1 1 1
B2
4125 4275 150 2.80 1 1 1

4275 4400 125 B4 3.30 1 1 1


11 1m SAND REPLACEMENT
4400 4775 375 B2 2.80 1 1 1

10 REFER TO DRAWING NO. 18AD032/C674


TREATMENT FOR MAIN ROAD & SERVICE (FOR MAIN
4775 4887.182 112.182 - 1 1 1
ROAD BEFORE PILED EMBANKMENT ALIGNMENT ONLY) 1m SAND REPLACEMENT

4887.182 4922.182 35
PILED EMBANKMENT -
6378.202 6398.202 20

REFER TO DRAWING NO. 18AD032/C674


TREATMENT FOR MAIN ROAD & SERVICE
6398.202 6525 126.798 - 1 1 1 NO PVD REQUIRED
ROAD AFTER PILED EMBANKMENT
1m SAND REPLACEMENT

6525 6775 250 B1 1 1 1


3.00
6775 6900 125 B2 1 1 1 1m SAND REPLACEMENT
10
6900 7100 200 B3 3.50 1 1 1

7100 7500 400 B2 3.00 1 1 1


2m SAND REPLACEMENT
7500 7735 235 -
-
7735 8775 1040 - 1m SAND REPLACEMENT

8775 8950 175 B1 3.00 1 1 1 2m SAND REPLACEMENT


10
8950 9050 100 B2 3.00 1 1 1 3m SAND REPLACEMENT

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE (SHEET 1 OF 2)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
Table 1.5 : Ground Treatment Schedule (cont'd)

GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE FOR MAIN ROAD

CHAINAGE VIBRATING WIRE


REDUCED LEVEL FOR ROAD SETTLEMENT INCLINOMETER (IM) MAX. PVD DEPTH
TREATMENT LENGTH (m) TREATMENT TYPE PIEZOMETER (VMP) REMARKS
STABILISING BERM (m) GAUGE (RSG) (MAX. 20m) OF 'N' (m)
FROM TO (MAX. 20m)

9050 9250 200 3.50 1 1 1 3m SAND REPLACEMENT


B3
9250 9575 325 3.80 1 1 1

9575 9750 175 B2 3.30 1 1 1

9750 10275 525 A1 - - 1 - 10

10275 10400 125 B2 2.60 1 1 1 1m SAND REPLACEMENT

10400 10625 225 3.00 1 1 1


B4
10625 10850 225 3.30 1 1 1

10850 11200 350 -

11200 11550 350 -

11550 11875 325 A1 - - 1 - - 2m SAND REPLACEMENT

11875 12775 900 -

12775 13950 1175 A1 - - 3 - -

13950 14075 125 B2 1 1 1

14075 14200 125 B3 3.00 1 1 1

14200 14400 200 1 1 1


B4
14400 14650 250 2.80 1 1 1 9

14650 15000 350 B2 2.40 1 1 1


1m SAND REPLACEMENT
15000 15200 200 B4 1 1 1
2.60
15200 15625 425 B5 1 1 1

15625 15925 300 B3 2.40 1 1 1 8

15925 16525 600 B4 2.60 2 2 2 8

16525 16625 100 B3 1 1 1


2.40 16
16625 16800 175 B2 1 1 1

REFER TO DRAWING NO. 18AD032/C675


16800 17073.605 273.605 TREATMENT FOR ROUNDABOUT
1m SAND REPLACEMENT

GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE FOR ROUTE B

CHAINAGE VIBRATING WIRE


REDUCED LEVEL FOR ROAD SETTLEMENT INCLINOMETER (IM)
TREATMENT LENGTH (m) TREATMENT TYPE PIEZOMETER (VMP) PVD LENGTH (m) REMARKS
STABILISING BERM (m) GAUGE (RSG) (MAX. 20m)
FROM TO (MAX. 20m)

REFER TO DRAWING NO. 18AD032/C675


0 687.135 687.135 TREATMENT FOR ROUNDABOUT
1m SAND REPLACEMENT

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE (SHEET 1 OF 2)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
1.4 Design Criteria

The geotechnical design criteria for this project shall follow typical JKR geotechnical criteria
(rev 3, 2011) as follows:

Table 1.6 Geotechnical Design Criteria

Description Criteria

Bearing (short Term) FoS = 1.4

Slope Stability Local & global slope stability


FoS = 1.2
(embankment on (short term)
soft ground)
Local & global slope stability
FoS = 1.3
(long term)

5 years post construction settlement:

(i) Within 50m from structures <100mm Differential


approach Settlement
Ground
Settlement (ii) Within 100m from structures <150mm Differential
approach Settlement

(iii) road < 250mm Total Settlement


1.5 Slope Stability Assessment

The stability of the proposed road shall be checked against the potential slip to ensure the
proposed site is stable after fill. Both drained and undrained analysis shall be carried out. The
stability due to surcharge shall also be considered even though it is not permanent.

The slope stability shall fulfill the minimum FoS of 1.2 and 1.3 for short term and long-term
stability respectively. Stability analyses were carried out using GeoStudio SLOPE/W.

1.5.1 Codes of Practice and Guidelines

A) “Code of Practice for Strengthen/Reinforced Soils and Other Fills”, BS 8006 : 1995.
B) “Guidelines for Slope Design”, Slope Engineering Branch, Public Works Department
Malaysia, 2010.

1.5.2 Design Parameters

The soil profile adopted in the design is deduced from the borehole logs presented in the SI
reports. Both drained and undrained analyses shall be carried out for slope stability check. The
soil strengths to be adopted are presented below.

1.5.2.1 Undrained Analysis

The undrained shear strength for the checking of the slope stability is best represented by the
values obtained from the vane shear in soft layer of the project site. These values can be read
from the characteristic curve in Figure 1.9.

For the overburden, it is possible to estimate the undrained shear strength, Cu from the SPT
data as stated in many literatures. Toh et al. (1989), Leach & Thompson (1979) have found
good agreement for Cu = 5N (kPa).

The design parameters for the undrained analysis to be adopted are presented in Table 1.7.
Vane Shear Test

Undrained Shear Strength (kN/m2)

0 5 10 15 20 25
0

Cu=10kPa

4
Depth (m)

Cu=10kPa+0.2Po

10

Undisturbed Remoulded Sensitivity

0.2Po 0.15Po Design Curve

Figure 1.9 Characteristic Curve


Table 1.7 Design Parameters for Undrained Analysis

Unit Weight Undrained Parameters


Material Properties
(kN/m3) Phi (°) Cu / C (kPa)
V. Soft / Soft 1 10
16.5 -
(0m – 3.5m) (Characteristic Curve)
V. Soft / Soft 2 10 + 0.2P0
16.5 -
(3.5m – 10m) (Characteristic Curve)
Firm 17.0 - 5N

Stiff 18.0 - 5N

Very Stiff 18.0 - 5N


Medium Dense
18.5 0 30
/Dense Sand
Very Loose SAND /
18.5 0 28
Loose SAND
PEAT /
12.0 0 30
Decayed Wood
Sand Fill 18.5 0 30

Earth Bund 18.5 3 30

Stabilising Berm 15.0 0 20

Surcharge 18.5 0 30

1.5.2.2 Drained Analysis

The soil parameters adopted are based on the empirical correlation with the plasticity index of
the soil as recommended by BS 8002 or Mitchell (1993) Kulhawy and Mayne (1990) as shown
in Figure 1.. The strength to be adopted are presented in Table 1.8.
Figure 1.10 Correlation Between Drained Angle of Friction of Fine-Grained Soils and
Plasticity Index.

Table 1.8 Design Parameters for Drained Analysis

Unit Weight Drained Parameters


Material Properties
(kN/m3) Phi (°) C’ (kPa)
V. Soft / Soft 1
16.5 20 3
(0m – 3.5m)
V. Soft / Soft 2
16.5 20 3
(3.5m – 10m)
Firm 17.0 22 3

Stiff 18.0 25 3

Very Stiff 18.0 28 3


Medium Dense /
18.5 0 30
Dense
Very Loose / Loose 18.5 0 27
PEAT /
12.0 0 30
Decayed Wood
Sand Fill 18.5 0 30

Earth Bund 18.5 3 30

Stabilising Berm 15.0 0 20

Surcharge 18.5 0 30
1.5.3 Design Scenarios & Results

i. Road Embankment

The road embankment has been analysed based on different fill height for all the soil types. Different scenarios that have been analysed are
tabulated in Table 1.9.

Table 1.9 Scenarios and results for Road Embankment

Factor of safety (FoS)


Relevant
Chainages Side Undrained Undrained Drained Remarks
BH
(No Treatment) (With Treatment) (With Treatment)
0+000 - 1+225 LHS 1.334 - 1.546
No treatment required
1+825 - 2+075 RHS 1.464 - 1.464
LHS 0.952 1.201 1.355
PBH7 1+225 - 1+400 B1
RHS 1.302 1.322 1.603
LHS 0.852 1.304 1.490
1+400 - 1+825 B3
RHS 0.854 1.314 1.521
LHS 1.352 - 1.447
DBH6 2+075 - 3+475 No treatment required
RHS 1.445 - 1.445

LHS 1.137 1.333 1.624


PBH6 3+475 - 3+850 A1
RHS 1.076 1.246 1.623
LHS 0.940 1.272 1.458
3+850 - 3+975 B1
RHS 0.957 1.287 1.446
LHS 0.835 1.270 1.358
3+975 - 4+275 B2
RHS 0.825 1.309 1.337
LHS 0.807 1.309 1.442
4+275 - 4+400 B4
RHS 0.774 1.303 1.427
BBH6
LHS 0.906 1.303 1.553
4+400 - 4+775 B2
RHS 0.846 1.212 1.450
LHS 1.037 1.303 1.348
6+525 – 6+775 B1
RHS 0.995 1.252 1.330

PBH5 + LHS 0.933 1.288 1.394


6+775 – 6+900 B2
HA11 RHS 0.948 1.303 1.407
LHS 0.882 1.280 1.378
6+900 – 7+100 B3
RHS 0.897 1.268 1.389
LHS 1.085 1.287 1.403
7+100 – 7+500 B2
PBH5 + RHS 1.077 1.282 1.369
HA10 LHS 1.281 - 1.346
7+500 – 7+735
RHS 1.254 - 1.368 No treatment Required
7+735 – 8+775 LHS 1.391 - 1.410
DBH5 +
RHS 1.303 - 1.382
HA9
LHS 1.113 1.217 1.353
8+775 – 8+950 B1
RHS 1.129 1.237 1.356
LHS 1.042 1.261 1.505
PBH4 8+950 – 9+050 B2
RHS 1.051 1.277 1.458
LHS 1.000 1.297 1.420
9+050 – 9+250 B3
RHS 0.973 1.267 1.394
LHS 0.852 1.350 1.408
9+250 – 9+575 B3
RHS 0.815 1.283 1.379
LHS 0.904 1.321 1.399
9+575 – 9+750 B2
RHS 0.856 1.244 1.382

DBH4 + LHS 1.274 1.501 1.695


9+750 – 10+275 A1
HA7 RHS 1.169 1.498 1.577
LHS 0.887 1.338 1.399
10+275 – 10+400 B2
RHS 0.851 1.227 1.404
LHS 0.752 1.257 1.380
10+400 – 10+850 B4
RHS 0.735 1.300 1.414
LHS 1.447 - 1.359
PBH 3 10+850 – 11+200 No treatment is required
RHS 1.488 - 1.388
DBH3 + 11+200 – 11+550 LHS 1.338 - 1.338
HA 6 11+875 – 12+775 RHS 1.333 - 1.333

Factor of safety (FoS)


Relevant
Chainages Side Undrained Drained Drained Remarks
BH
(No Treatment) (No Treatment) (With Treatment)
DBH3 + LHS 1.283 1.283 1.422
11+550 – 11+875 A1
HA 6 RHS 1.283 1.283 1.421

Factor of safety (FoS)


Relevant
Chainages Side Undrained Undrained Drained Remarks
BH
(No Treatment) (With Treatment) (With Treatment)
LHS 1.176 1.468 1.629
12+775 – 13+950 A1
RHS 1.153 1.380 1.728
LHS 0.886 1.273 1.464
13+950 – 14+075 B2
RHS 0.887 1.282 1.503
DBH2
LHS 0.812 1.267 1.393
14+075 – 14+200 B3
RHS 0.868 1.334 1.588
LHS 0.704 1.205 1.325
14+200 – 14+650 B4
RHS 0.736 1.255 1.335
LHS 0.878 1.270 1.401
PBH1 14+650 – 15+000 B2
RHS 0.885 1.260 1.424
LHS 0.724 1.252 1.415
15+000 – 15+200 B4
RHS 0.751 1.284 1.420
LHS 0.650 1.212 1.347
15+200 – 15+625 B5
RHS 0.691 1.299 1.372

15+625 – 15+925 LHS 0.807 1.297 1.372


B3
16+525 – 16+625 RHS 0.851 1.368 1.394
DBH1 + LHS 0.716 1.253 1.312
HA2 + 15+925 – 16+525 B4
RHS 0.701 1.228 1.312
HA3
LHS 0.858 1.325 1.437
16+625 – 16+800 B2
RHS 0.894 1.283 1.449

The ground treatment is provided if the fill embankment does not meet the design criteria of FoS 1.2 for short term and 1.3 for long term. From
Table 1.9, it can be seen that the factor of safety achieved for proposed fill height with proposed treatment are greater than 1.2 and 1.3 for undrained
and undrained respectively, which have fulfilled JKR design criteria (1.2 for short and 1.3 for long term).
Please note that the design for the bridge approach, i.e. the stretch where the mainline is parallel with service road and also the piled embankment
is presented separately in the Bridge Design Calculation Report.
ii. Service Road

The stability of the service road has been assessed to make sure the road is stable after fill. Both
undrained and drained analysis has been carried out and the results are tabulated in Table 1.10.
The treatment type applies to the service road along the bridge at both Sarikei and Tanjung
Manis sides. BBH4 is selected as the worst borehole for analysing the service road along the
bridge such that the very soft soil layer is 10.10m thick. As for the treatment of road service
before piled embankment, BBH6 is adopted as it shows 10.20m soft soil layer. Although the
borehole around the piled embankment at Tanjung Manis side indicates the ground is sandy, it
is still possible that soft soil layer is present based on MP/HA11.

Table 1.10 Scenarios and Results for Service Road

Relevant Factor of Safety


Side Treatment Type Model
BH (FoS)
Service Road along the Bridge

LHS Undrained 1.239

BBH4 LHS Drained 1.337


(worst No treatment
BH) RHS Undrained 1.246

RHS Drained 1.360

Service Road before Piled Embankment

LHS No treatment Undrained 1.041

1 layer of geotextile
LHS Undrained 1.542
reinforcement with
minimum design
BBH6 LHS Drained 1.641
strength of 400kN/m
(worst
BH) RHS No treatment Undrained 1.019

1 layer of geotextile
RHS Undrained 1.524
reinforcement with
minimum design
RHS Drained 1.605
strength of 400kN/m
From Table 1.10, it can be seen that the factor of safety (FoS) achieved for Service Road along
the bridge is more than 1.2 and 1.3 for undrained and drained analysis respectively. Therefore,
no treatment is required.
For the service road before piled embankment, the factor of safety achieved for original design
is less than 1.2. Thus, a layer of geotextile reinforcement with minimum design strength of
400kN/m is proposed. The analysis with proposed ground treatment has been assessed and the
FoS achieved are greater than 1.2 and 1.3 for both undrained and drained analysis respectively.
iii. Roundabout

The slope stability assessment for the roundabout has also been carried out to make sure the
roundabout is stable after fill. The embankment is filled with gentle slope of 1V:4H.

Table 1.11 Scenarios and Results for Roundabout

Relevant Treatment Factor of


Chainages Model
BH Type Safety (FoS)

CH16+800 – No treatment Undrained 1.187


CH17+073.605
&
EBH1 Undrained 1.239
Route B Gentle slope
& gradient of 1:4
Roundabout Drained 1.860

The factor of safety (FoS) achieved for roundabout with normal fill gradient, i.e. 1V:2H is less
than 1.2. Thus, gentle slope gradient, 1V:4H is proposed to improve the stability of the
embankment in order to meet the design requirement.

iv. Bridge Approach

The stability at the bridge approach has also been analyzed to make sure the stability of both
riverbanks is taken care of. The analysis also indicates the length of piled embankment required.
The bridge approach analyses are presented in Bridge Design Calculation Report.

All the slope stability modelling are presented in Appendix B.


1.6 Ground Settlement Analysis

1.6.1 General Description of Soil Treatment

The proposed soil treatment method aims to mitigate the post construction settlement. It is
basically filling up the existing ground level to the proposed final road level with sand fill
material at construction rate of 300mm per 2 weeks.

1.6.2 Method of Consolidation Settlement Analysis

There is a total of 22 boreholes (excluding the river boreholes and existing boreholes) along
the project site. As the thickness of soft soil is very similar (average around 7m-8m) for the
relevant boreholes, to simplify the settlement analysis, two boreholes namely BBH6 and PBH4
were selected for consolidation settlement analysis because of the presence of peat and thick
layer of soft soil (approximately 10.2m). The consolidation settlements were analyzed based
on 2m, 3.5m and 5m (highest fill height) of fill to estimate the worst settlement condition along
the road.

The consolidation settlement analysis scenarios are shown in Table 1.12.


Table 1.12 Proposed scenario for consolidation settlement analysis

Case Fill Height Soil Type Treatment

1 2.0 m

2 3.5 m 10.2m very soft soil

3 5.0 m
No treatment
4 2.0 m

5 3.5 m 4.0m peat + 6m very soft soil

6 5.0 m

7 3.5 m
10.2m very soft soil
8 5.0 m PVD + 0.5m
Surcharge for 9
9 2.0 m
months with 3m
10 3.5 m 4.0m peat + 6m very soft soil peat removal

11 5.0 m
Manual calculation using Terzaghi’s one dimensional consolidation theory has been carried
out to estimate the ground settlement. Karl Terzaghi 1948 developed Equation 1 which is used
for computing the primary consolidation settlement.

𝑆 . 𝐿 . 𝑙𝑜𝑔 . 𝐿 . 𝑙𝑜𝑔 …….…… Equation 1

Where,
eo = Initial Void Ratio
Lo = Consolidation Thickness (m)
σ' p = Pre-consolidation pressure (kPa)
σ' vo = Existing Overburden Pressure (kPa)
σ' vf = Final Overburden Pressure (kPa)
Cr/(1+eo) = Compressiblity index for over consolidated soil

The typical design values adopted for the consolidation settlement analysis are shown in Table
1.13.

Table 1.13 Typical Parameters adopted for Consolidation Settlement Analysis


ɣfill ɣbulk ɣdry
Layer Cc / (1+e0) Cr / (1+e0) Cv
(kN/m3) (kN/m3) (kN/m3)
PEAT 18.5 12.00 2.00 0.583 - 6
UD1 (Soft
18.5 15.64 9.72 0.438 0.071 3
Soil)

1.6.3 Results

Table 1.14 summarises the salient features of consolidation settlement calculation results. The
detail settlement calculations are attached in Appendix C. It can be seen all the cases with no
treatment except case 1 have not fulfilled the design criteria of 5 years post construction
settlement, i.e. the total settlement >250mm, thus PVD with surcharge for 9 months is proposed.
The settlement analysis with proposed treatment has also been carried out and the results show
the post 5 years and 7 years construction have not exceeding 250mm.
Table 1.14 Consolidation Settlement Calculation Results

Post Construction Settlement (mm)


5 years post 7 years post
Case construction construction Remarks

Year 10

Year 20

Year 30

Year 40

Year 50

Year 60
Year 0

Year 1

Year 2

Year 5

Year 7
settlement (mm) settlement (mm)

1 231 202 184 145 125 101 50 24 12 6 5 86 106 < 250mm, no treatment required.

2 836 739 673 532 459 371 182 90 44 22 11 304 377

3 1250 1116 1019 807 697 563 277 136 67 33 17 443 553
> 250mm, therefore
4 2032 909 460 128 73 38 5 1 - - - 1904 1959 PVD & surcharge for 9 months is
proposed.
5 2399 1201 691 252 154 82 11 2 - - - 2147 2245

6 2505 1335 817 329 205 109 15 3 - - - 2176 2300

7 51 46 43 33 28 22 10 6 2 1 - 18 23

8 79 73 66 51 44 33 15 10 4 1 1 28 36

< 250mm
9 34 8 7 5 4 2 - - - - - 29 30
with PVD & surcharge for 9 months

10 85 44 36 19 13 9 1 - - - - 66 70

11 120 69 56 31 21 12 2 - - - - 89 99
Appendix A
SI PLAN & SOIL PROFILE
EBH1

MP/HA1

DBH1

MP/HA2

LEGEND PBH1

EBH EXISTING BOREHOLE MP/HA3

PROPOSED DBH2
PBH BOREHOLE (PED) AT
ROAD MP/HA4
PROPOSED
DBH BOREHOLE (DED) AT PBH2
ROAD
PROPOSED MP/HA5
RBH BOREHOLE (PED) AT
BRIDGE APPROACH DBH3
PROPOSED
BBH BOREHOLE (DED) AT MP/HA6 DBH4
BRIDGE APPROACH
PBH3
PROPOSED RIVER MP/HA8
WBH
BOREHOLE (DED) MP/HA7 PBH4 MP/HA9

DBH5
MACKINTOSH PROBE
MP/HA
/ HAND AUGER MP/HA10

MP/HA11
PBH5

BBH1
BBH2
BBH3
MACKINTOSH PROBE / HAND AUGER BOREHOLE (DED) AT BRIDGE RBH1
BOREHOLE (DED) AT ROAD SETTING OUT POINT
SETTING OUT POINT SETTING OUT POINT WBH1
WBH2
COORDINATES(m) COORDINATES(m) COORDINATES(m) WBH3
POINT POINT POINT RBH2
BBH4
EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) BBH5
BBH6
MP/HA1 2200820.387 5247755.723 DBH1 2200842.834 5247237.074 BBH1 2208516.335 5242514.799
MP/HA12
MP/HA2 2200980.093 5246871.665 DBH2 2201802.967 5245767.592 BBH2 2208560.948 5242403.391
EBH6
MP/HA13
MP/HA3 2201421.535 5246097.593 DBH3 2203474.387 5244567.523 BBH3 2208604.404 5242291.535
PBH6
MP/HA4 2202214.100 5245467.411 DBH4 2205388.656 5244059.480 BBH4 2208914.758 5241482.475

MP/HA5 2203084.076 5244835.573 DBH5 2207238.831 5243480.373 BBH5 2208958.183 5241370.597 MP/HA14

MP/HA6 2203919.720 5244290.476 DBH6 2208642.124 5239334.712 BBH6 2209001.508 5241258.691


DBH6
MP/HA7 2204883.469 5243966.127 DBH7 2208316.018 5237575.741
BOREHOLE (PED) AT BRIDGE
MP/HA8 2205879.728 5244096.770 SETTING OUT POINT
MP/HA15
MP/HA9 2206720.433 5243760.756 BOREHOLE (PED) AT ROAD SETTING OUT POINT COORDINATES(m)
POINT
MP/HA10 2207651.000 5243249.440 COORDINATES(m) PBH7
EASTING (E) NORTHING (N)
MP/HA11 2208300.146 5242854.755 POINT
EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) RBH1 2208644.704 5242178.918 MP/HA16
MP/HA12 2209069.610 5240628.024
PBH1 2201189.158 5246471.412 RBH2 2208870.735 5241594.353 DBH7
MP/HA13 2209060.733 5240569.961
PBH2 2202663.595 5245137.669
MP/HA14 2208816.376 5239842.557 RIVER BOREHOLE (DED) SETTING OUT POINT EBH7
PBH3 2204369.339 5244031.000
MP/HA15 2208462.405 5238804.137
COORDINATES(m) MP/HA17
PBH4 2206334.157 5243961.157
MP/HA16 2208265.212 5237904.870 POINT
PBH5 2208084.238 5243003.235 EASTING (E) NORTHING (N)
MP/HA17 2208523.723 5236735.008
PBH6 2208962.258 5240255.962 WBH1 2208687.028 5242069.350
PBH7 2208310.912 5238373.455 2208759.203 5241882.828
WBH2

WBH3 2208831.379 5241696.305

SOIL INVESTIGATION PLAN


TERMINATION CRITERIA: SCALE : N.T.S.

(a) BOREHOLE AT ROAD:


BOREHOLE SHALL BE TERMINATED WHEN THREE (3) CONSECUTIVE SPT N-VALUE ≥ 50 OR REBOUNCE (ROCK) OR MAX. 30m WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.

(b) BOREHOLE AT BRIDGE APPROACH:


BOREHOLE SHALL BE TERMINATED WHEN EIGHT (8) CONSECUTIVE SPT N-VALUE ≥ 50 OR 7m ROCK CORING OR MAX. 60m WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.

(c) RIVER BOREHOLE:


Project Title : Drawing Title :
BOREHOLE SHALL BE TERMINATED WHEN TEN (10) CONSECUTIVE SPT N-VALUE ≥ 50 OR 7m ROCK CORING OR MAX. 60m WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. SOIL INVESTIGATION PLAN
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 450m APPROX. 812m

EBH7 DBH7 PBH7


MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? SOFT LIGHT MEDIUM GREY
CLAY
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER
? ? 0.20
0.00-0.20 NIL ? SOFT MEDIUM BROWN CLAY WITH
DECAYED MATTER AND PEAT
?
1m 1m 1m
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
2m 1.50-1.95 N=4 FIRM LIGHT SANDY CLAY 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 68 31 70.45 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 68 31 82.42 SANDY SILT WITH SOME
2.50 2.50 DECAYED MATTERS
? 3m ? MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY
? 3m 3m
3.00-3.45 N = 17 CLAYEY SAND WITH TRACES 3.00-3.45 N=1 3.00-3.45 NIL 0 1 67 32 71.11
4m 4.00 OF ROCK FRAGMENT 4m 4m VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
? VERY STIFF MEDIUM ORANGE ? VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
SANDY SILT
SANDY SILT
5m 4.50-4.95 N = 25 CLAY WITH TRACES OF ROCK 5m 4.50-4.95 N=1 0 1 66 33 74.13 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
5.50 FRAGMENT 5.50
? 6m ? HARD MEDIUM ORANGE
? 6m 6m
6.405 6.00-6.405 N = 59 6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.50 NIL
VERY SOFT LIGHT GREY
SANDY CLAY WITH SOME OF 0 24 41 35 21.71
? ROCK FRAGMENT ? 7m 7m 7.00
SLIGHTLY SANDY CLAY

EBH7 TERMINATED AT 6.405m


BELOW GROUND LEVEL 8m 7.50-7.95 N=0 8m 7.50-7.95 N=3 0 2 68 30 66.29
SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
8.50 SILT
? 9m ? DENSE MEDIUM GREY SLIGHTLY ? 9m 9.00
9.00-9.45 N = 49 2 95 3 23.87 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND WITH ? 9.00-9.45 N = 14 3 37 43 17 59.43 ?
10m 10.00 TRACES OF GRAVEL 10m
STIFF GREY SANDY SILTY WITH
TRACES OF GRAVEL
11m 10.50- 11m 10.50-
N = 34 N = 15
10.95 11.50 10.95

12m
DENSE MEDIUM GREY SAND
? 12m ? ?
12.00- 0 100 0 23.23 12.00- 0 99 1 23.95
N = 44 N = 63
12.45 12.39
13m 13.00 13m

14m 13.50- N = 88 14m 13.50- N = 100 VERY DENSE BROWN SLIGHTLY


13.82 13.80 CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND

15m VERY DENSE MEDIUM GREY 15m


15.00- 0 96 4 24.10 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY 15.00-
N = 128 N = 150
15.267 SAND 15.17
16m 16m

? 16.685 16.50-
? ? 16.58
16.50- ? ?
16.685
N = 250
DBH7 TERMINATED AT 16.685m ? 16.58
N = 600
PBH7 TERMINATED AT 16.58m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SOIL PROFILE 1
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)

LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :

SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT

SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 1
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 975m APPROX. 1036m

DBH6 PBH6 BBH6

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 1.00
0.00-0.20 NIL
? TOO PEATY 139.12 VERY SOFT DARK BROWN PEAT
WITH ROOTS
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL TOO PEATY 304.98 VERY SOFT BROWNISH
MEDIUM GREY PEAT WITH
? ?
1m 1m 1.00 1m 1.20 ROOTS
VERY SOFT GREYISH LIGHT
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 60 39 39.42 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0
BROWN CLAY VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN TO
2.50 VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY SANDY SILT
3m 3m CLAY 3m
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 28 50 22 43.08 3.00-3.45 N=2 0 3 44 53 39.72 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 3 65 32 85.83
4m VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY 4m 4.00 4m 4.00
SANDY SILT VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=2 0 3 50 47 36.32 SANDY CLAY 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
5.50 ? 5.20
? ?
6m 6m 6m
FIRM LIGHT GREY CLAY VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
6.00-6.50 NIL 0 0 73 27 76.93 VERY SOFT GREY SILT 6.00-6.45 N=5 0 0 58 42 44.34 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 8 67 25 61.23
SANDY CLAY
7m 7.00 7m 7.00 7m
? ? ?
7.50-7.95 N=5 0 0 69 31 41.49 FIRM LIGHT GREY CLAY 7.50-7.95 N = 12 0 0 57 43 43.54 STIFF LIGHT GREY CLAY 7.50-7.95 N=0
8m 8m 8.20 8m
8.50 ? ? ? 8.50
? 9m ? 9m 9m VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
9.00-9.45 N = 21 0 0 69 31 49.94 VERY STIFF LIGHT GREY CLAY 9.00-9.34 N = 79 9.00-9.50 NIL 2 8 66 24 62.65 SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF
10.00 HARD LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
10m 10m 10m GRAVEL
? ? SANDY CLAY
?
10.20
? ?
10.50- 0 1 67 32 20.63 10.50- 0 2 67 31 19.58 10.50- 0 1 68 31 55.26 FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
11m N = 68 11m N = 30 11m N=4
10.87 10.95 10.95 CLAY
HARD BROWN SLIGHTLY 11.50 11.50
12m SANDY CLAY 12m ? 12m ?
12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 0 66 30 4 25.82
MEDIUM DENSE GREY VERY
N = 100 N = 83 N = 14
12.30 12.33 12.45 SILTY SAND
13m 13m 13m 13.00
HARD LIGHT GREY CLAY
13.72
? 13.50-
13.72
N = 115 ? DBH6 TERMINATED AT 13.72m
? 14m 13.50-
13.81
N = 94 14m 13.50-
13.95
N = 24 8 88 4 27.99
MEDIUM DENSE GREY
BELOW GROUND LEVEL SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
15m 15m SAND WITH TRACES OF
15.285
? 15.00-
15.285
N = 111 ? ? ? 15.00-
15.45
N = 26 GRAVEL
PBH6 TERMINATED AT 15.285m 16m 16.00
BELOW GROUND LEVEL ? ? ?
17m 16.50-
N = 28
16.95 VERY STIFF MEDIUM GREY
CLAY WITH SOME SANDS
18m
18.00-
N = 27
19m 19.00 18.45
? ? ?
20m 19.50- 11 35 42 12 23.22
N = 67
19.875

21m
21.00- HARD GREY SANDY CLAY
N = 100 WITH A LITTLE OF GRAVEL
22m 21.30
(WEATHERED SILTSTONE)

23m 22.50-
N = 136
22.74

24m
13 43 31 13 18.98
24.00-
N = 100
25m 25.00 24.245

26m 25.50-
N = 125
25.74

27m
27.00- HARD GREY SANDY CLAY
N = 167
28m 27.16 WITH A LITTLE OF GRAVEL

28.50- 13 51 28 8 18.80
29m N = 214
28.64

30m 30.07
? 30.00-
N = 1500
? BBH6 TERMINATED AT 30.07m
?
30.07
BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SOIL PROFILE 2
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)

LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :

SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT

SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 2
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 1200m APPROX. 120m

BBH5 BBH4 RBH2

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER ? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT
WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL
MEDIUM BROWN SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER ?
1m 1m 1m
1.20 MATTER
VERY SOFT DARK BROWN VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 TOO PEATY 227.21 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 60 39 85.18 VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY 2m 1.50-1.95 N=2 0 0 83 17 152.83 SOME DECAYED MATTER
PEAT WITH SOME WOODS
SANDY SILT 2.40
? 3m
2.50
? 3m
2.50
3m
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 66 34 79.67 VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 64 36 64.64 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 3 65 32 64.02
SOME WOODS VERY SOFT SLIGHTLY SANDY
4m 4.00 4m VERY SOFT GREY SILT 4m SILT WITH TRACES OF
VERY SOFT MEDIUM BROWN ORGANIC MATTER
5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
CLAY
5.50 5.50 5.50
6m 6m 6m
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
6.00-6.50 NIL 0 13 63 24 53.94 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 16 50 34 59.02 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 0 72 28 86.09
SANDY SILT SANDY SILT TRACES OF ORGANIC MATTER
7m 7.00 7m 7.00 7m 7.00

8m 7.50-7.95 N=0 8m 7.50-7.95 N=1 0 26 51 23 48.52 8m 7.50-7.95 N=2 0 5 64 31 66.15


VERY SOFT TO SOFT BROWN VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY VERY SOFT TO SOFT GREY
SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT SANDY SILT SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT
9m 9m 9m
9.00-9.45 N=3 0 26 58 16 60.77 9.00-9.45 N=2 9.00-9.45 N=4 0 27 54 19 49.86

? 10m 10.00
? ? 10m 10.10
? ? 10m 10.00
?
STIFF GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
10.50- 10.50- 1 32 48 19 53.19 10.50- 0 92 8 27.93
11m N=7 11m N = 11 SILTY WITH TRACES OF 11m N=6
10.95 10.95 10.95
11.50 GRAVEL
12m FIRM BROWNISH GREY SANDY ? 12m ? ? 12m LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
12.00- 0 28 59 13 48.07 12.00- MEDIUM DENSE DARK BROWN 12.00-
N=4 SILT N = 12 N=8 / SILTY SAND
12.45 12.45 SAND WITH DECAYED WOOD 12.45
13m
?
13m 13.00
? ? 13m

13.50- 13.50- 0 28 35 37 107.83


STIFF GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY 13.50-
14m N=5 14m N = 13
SILTY WITH SOME WOOD 14m N = 10
13.95 13.95 13.95
14.50 14.50 14.50
? 15m
? ? 15m ? 15m
? ?
15.00- 1 84 15 33.84 15.00- 0 42 50 8 168.64 15.00- 0 36 45 19 43.33 STIFF GREY SANDY SILT
N = 12 N = 13 STIFF DARK BROWN SANDY N = 11
15.45 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM BROWN 15.45 15.45
16m 16m 16m 16.00
CLAYEY / SILTY SAND WITH
TRACES OF GRAVEL
SILTY WITH SOME DECAYED
WOOD ? ? ?
17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50-
N = 28 N = 14 N = 15
17.50 16.95 17.50 16.95 16.95 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
18m ? 18m ? 18m
GREY CLAYEY SAND
MEDIUM DENSE GREYISH
18.00- 18.00- DARK BROWN SILTY SAND 18.00-
N = 22 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY N = 17 N = 16
19m 18.45 19m 19.00 18.45 19m 19.00 18.45
CLAYEY SAND
MEDIUM DENSE GREY SILTY
20m 19.50- 20m 19.50- 20m 19.50- 0 88 12 24.37
N = 28 N = 17 SAND N = 16
20.50 19.95 20.50 19.95 19.95

21m ? 21m
? ? 21m
0 99 1 23.48 0 2 67 31 27.73 MEDIUM DENSE BROWN
21.00- 21.00- 21.00-
N = 21 N = 22 N = 18 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
22m 21.45 22m 21.45 22m 21.45
MEDIUM DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY VERY STIFF LIGHT GREY
CLAYEY / SILTY SAND SLIGHTLY SANDY CLAY
23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 23m 22.50-
N = 29 N = 26 N = 21
22.95 23.50 22.95 23.50 22.95
? 24m
23.50
? ? 24m ? ? ? 24m
? ?
24.00- 24.00- 9 46 38 7 22.03 24.00- 1 11 65 23 27.15
N = 30 N = 32 N = 67
25m 24.45 25m 24.45 25m 24.375 HARD LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SANDY CLAY WITH TRACES OF
SILTY SAND GRAVEL
26m 25.50- 26m 25.50- 26m 25.50- 2 19 62 17 22.08
N = 30 N = 55 N = 54
25.95 25.925 25.927
26.50
? 27m ? 27m 27m
26.80

27.00- 0 98 2 21.07 MEDIUM DENSE GREY SLGHTLY 27.00- 27.00-


N = 27 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND N = 57 N = 64
27.45 27.411 27.385
28m 28.00 28m 28m
? ?
28.50-
DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / 28.50- 28.50- 6 31 44 19 15.89
29m N = 30 29m N = 61 29m N = 77
28.95 SILTY SAND 28.895 HARD GREY SANDY CLAY 28.845
29.50
? 30m ? 30m
WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL
30m
HARD LIGHT GREY SANDY
CLAY WITH TRACES OF
30.00- MEDIUM DENSE GREY SAND 30.00- 5 39 42 14 20.35 30.00-
N = 27 N = 57 N = 88 GRAVEL (WEATHERED
30.45 30.415 30.32
? 31m 31.00
? 31m 31m SILTSTONE)

31.50- 31.50- 31.50- N = 375


32m N = 31 32m N = 61 32m
31.95 31.895 31.615
DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
33m SAND WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL 33m 33m
33.00- 3 79 18 20.63 33.00- 33.00- N = 300
N = 32 N = 64
33.45 33.385 33.11
34m 34.00 34m 34m
34.60
35m 34.50-
N = 31
DENSE GREY SAND 35m 34.50-
34.825
N = 86 ? 34.50-
34.60
N = 300 ? RBH2 TERMINATED AT 34.60m
?
34.95
? 36m
35.50
? 36m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
MEDIUM DENSE GREY CLAYEY / 36.33
36.00-
36.45
N = 29
0 91 9 23.90
SILTY SAND ? 36.00-
36.33
N = 83
? BBH4 TERMINATED AT 36.33m
?
37m 37.00
? ? BELOW GROUND LEVEL

38m 37.50-
N = 30
37.95

39m
39.00-
N = 34
40m 39.45
DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
SAND
41m 40.50-
N = 33
40.95

42m
42.00- 0 90 10 22.39
N = 33
43m 42.45

44m 43.50-
N = 34
43.95
? 45m
44.50
?
45.00-
N = 27
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :
45.95
46m

47m 46.50-
N = 29 SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT
46.95

48m
48.00- 0 94 6 24.48
N = 23 MEDIUM DENSE GREY CLAYEY /
49m 48.45
SILTY SAND SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

50m 49.50-
N = 25
49.95

51m
CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE
51.00-
N = 24
52m 51.45

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE


53m 52.50-
N = 29
52.95
? 54m
53.50
?
54.00-
N = 32
0 93 7 24.26 MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD
55m 54.45

56m 55.50-
N = 34
55.95 NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined
DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
57m
SAND Symbols. c.g.
57.00-
N = 34
58m 57.45
silty SAND
59m 58.50-
N = 37
58.95

60m
60.45 60.00-
? 60.45
N = 36
? BBH5 TERMINATED AT 60.45m ?
BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SOIL PROFILE 3 Project Title : Drawing Title :


SCALE 1 : 125 (A1) PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 3
1 : 250 (A3)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 200m APPROX. 200m

WBH3 WBH2 WBH1

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.

1m 1m 1m LOOSE GREY SLIGHTLY


CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
2m 1.50-1.95 N=1 2m 1.50-1.95 N=6 0 67 26 7 31.81 2m 1.50-1.95 N=6 0 98 2 25.92
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
SANDY SILT LOOSE BROWNISH MEDIUM 2.50
3m 3m GREY VERY SILTY SAND 3m
3.00-3.45 N=2 0 5 72 56 60.73 3.00-3.45 N=7 3.00-3.45 N=7
4m 4m 4m
4.50
? ? 5m 4.50-4.95 N=4 ? ? 5m 4.50-4.95 N=8 5m 4.50-4.95 N=7 1 90 9 23.16
LOOSE GREY CALYEY / STILY
SAND WITH TRACES OF
5.50 GRAVEL
6m 6m LOOSE BROWNISH MEDIUM 6m
6.00-6.45 N=3 0 85 15 30.64 VERY LOOSE GREY CLAYEY / 6.00-6.45 N=8 3 90 7 21.75 6.00-6.45 N = 10
GREY CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
7m SILTY SAND 7m 7.00 7m
7.50
LOOSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
8m 7.50-7.95 N=3 8m 7.50-7.95 N=8 8m 7.50-7.95 N=7
GREY CLAYEY SAND
8.50 8.50
9m 9m 9m FIRM TO STIFF FREY SILT
9.00-9.45 N=8 0 95 5 23.85 LOOSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY 9.00-9.45 N=8 LOOSE BROWNISH MEDIUM 9.00-9.45 N=4
SAND GREY SAND
10m 10.00 10m 10.00 10m 10.00
? ? ?
11m 10.50- 0 95 5 20.36 11m 10.50- 7 89 4 18.44 11m 10.50-
N = 11 N = 11 MEDIUM DENSE BROWNISH N = 23 VERY STIFF MEDIUM GREY
10.95 10.95 10.95
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY CLAY
12m CLAYEY / SILTY SAND 12m CLAYEY / SILTY SAND WITH 12m 12.00
12.00- 12.00- TRACES OF GRAVEL 12.00-
N = 13 N = 14 N = 12
12.45 12.45 12.45
13m 13.00 13m 13.00 13m
? ?
14m 13.50- N=8 0 0 61 39 100.51 14m 13.50- N =7 0 5 71 24 41.55 14m 13.50- N = 10
13.95 13.95 13.95
STIFF GREYISH SILTY WITH
15m SOME DECAYED WOOD 15m 15m
15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 0 4 73 23 45.28
N=9 N = 11 N=8
15.45 15.45 15.45
16m 16.00 16m 16m
? ? ?
17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 0 7 71 22 42.57 17m 16.50-
N = 11 N=7 N=9
16.85 16.95 16.85

18m 18m 18m


18.00- 2 13 62 23 26.29 18.00- 18.00-
N = 67 N=8 N = 10
18.375 18.45 18.45
19m 19m 19m STIFF GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
SILT
19.50- 19.50- 19.50- 0 5 79 16 38.59
20m N = 68 20m N=8 20m N=8
19.87 HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY 19.95 19.95
SANDY CLAY WITH TRACES OF
21m GRAVEL 21m 21m
21.00- 6 11 60 23 18.77 21.00- 0 8 70 22 42.89 21.00-
21.435 N =53 21.45 N=7 21.45 N=9
22m 22m 22m

23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 23m 22.50-


N = 71 N=8 N = 10
22.86 22.95 22.95

24m 24m 24m


24.00- 24.00- 24.00-
N = 73 N=9 N = 10
24.355 24.45 24.45
25m 25.00 25m 25m

25.50- 7 16 58 19 15.22 25.50- 0 3 78 19 48.75 25.50-


26m N = 73 26m N=9 FIRM TO STIFF GREY 26m N=9
25.855 25.95 25.95
SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT
27m 27m 27m
27.00- 27.00- 27.00-
N = 91 N=9 N = 12
27.315 HARD GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY 27.45 27.45
28m 28m 28m 28.00
CLAY WITH TRACES OF
GRAVEL FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
28.50- 28.50- 28.50- 0 2 72 26 40.75
29m N = 750 29m N=9 29m N=7
28.855 28.95 28.95 SILT
29.50
30m 30m 30m
30.00- 30.00- 30.00-
N = 111 N = 10 N = 10
30.285 30.45 30.45
31m 31m 31m
31.50
? 32m
? ? 32m 31.50-
N=8 0 5 76 19 53.34 32m 31.50-
N=8
31.50- 31.95 31.95
100 NIL
33.00
33m 33m 33m
33.00- 33.00- 0 0 70 30 63.86
N = 10 N=8
33.00- 33.45 33.45
34m 100 NIL 34m 34m
34.50

34.50- 34.50-
35m 35m N=9 35m N = 14
34.50- 34.95 34.95
100 NIL
36.00
36m 36m 36m STIFF GREY SILT
WEAK MEDIUM GREY 36.00- 36.00-
N = 10 N = 11
36.00- 36.45 36.45
37m 100 NIL MODERATELY WEATHERED 37m 37m
37.50
AND HIGHLY FRACTURED
MUDSTONE 37.50- 37.50-
38m 38m N=9 0 4 73 23 50.93 38m N=8
37.50- 37.95 37.95
80 NIL
39.00
39m 39m 39m
39.00- 39.00-
N=9 N=9
39.00- 39.45 39.45
40m 80 NIL 40m 40m
40.50

40.50- 40.50- 0 0 81 19 53.40


41m 40.50- 41m N=8 41m N=8
80 NIL 40.95 40.95
41.50 41.50
WBH3 TERMINATED AT 41.50m 42m 42m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL 42.00- 0 4 73 23 43.84 42.00-
N=9 N=9
42.45 42.45
43m 43.00 43m 43.00
43.70 HARD LIGHT GREY SILTY WITH
SOME GRAVEL 43.50-
44m 44m N = 12
43.95 MEDIUM DENSE GREY VERY
43.70-
100 100 SILTY GRAVEL WITH SOME
45.20
45m 45m SAND
45.00- 35 32 26 7 19.31
N = 10
45.45
46m 45.20- 46m 46.00
100 100
46.70
46.50-
47m 47m N=8
46.95
46.70-
100 NIL FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
48.20
48m 48m SILT WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL
48.00- 1 5 71 23 43.53
MODERATELY STRONG N=7
48.45
49m 48.20- MEDIUM GREY MODERATELY 49m 49.00
100 NIL
49.70 WEATHERED SHALE
49.50-
50m 50m N=9
49.95
49.70-
100 NIL
51.20
51m 51m
51.00- STIFF GREY CLAY WITH SOME
N = 10 GRAVEL
51.20- 51.45
80 NIL
52m 52.20 52m

53m 52.20- 53m


70 45
53.70 53.50
53.70
54m
WBH3 TERMINATED AT 41.50m 54.00-
N = 21 30 38 24 8 11.93
BELOW GROUND LEVEL 54.45
55m MEDIUM DENSE GREY SILTY
SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL
56m

57m 57.00
57.00-
N = 34
57.45
58m

59m

SOIL PROFILE 4 60m


60.00-
DENSE MEDIUM GREY VERY
SILTY SAND WITH A LITTLE
GRAVEL
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE : SCALE 1 : 150 (A1) 61m
60.45
N = 36 11 65 32 3 18.10

1 : 300 (A3)
62m
SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT
63m 63.00
63.40 VERY DENSE MEDIUM GREY
64m SILTY FINE SAND WITH
63.40- TRACES OF GRAVEL
30 NIL
64.90
SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE 65m
64.90-
100 NIL
66m 66.40
WEAK MEDIUM GREY HIGHLY
WEATHERED HIGHLY
CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE 67m 66.40-
NIL NIL FRACTURED SHALE
67.90
68m
67.90-
100 NIL
68.40
SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE 68.40
WBH1 TERMINATED AT 68.40m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 4
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 120m APPROX. 120m

RBH1 BBH3 BBH2

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN
PEATY CLAY WITH SOME
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? 0 0 77 23 83.94
DARK BROWN SILT WITH ? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL MEDIUM BROWN PEAT ?
1m 1.20 1m TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER 1m
DECAYED MATTER 0.70
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 0 80 20 77.61 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 0 66 34 93.82
VERY SOFT GREY SILT DECAYED WOODS
2.50 VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY 2.50
SANDY SILT WITH SOME
3m 3m DECAYED MATTER 3m
3.00-3.45 N=0
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 6 68 26 67.76 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 1 67 32 78.71 0 0 69 31 71.53
ORGANIC MATTER
4m 4m 4.00 4m 4.00

VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN


5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=3 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
CLAY
SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY 5.50
6m VERY SOFT TO SOFT GREY 6m SILT ? 6m ?
NIL 0 2 71 27 78.80 NIL 0 2 60 38 60.05 6.00-6.45 N = 10 0 33 52 15 42.86
STIFF BROWN SLIGHTLY
6.00-6.50 SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT 6.00-6.50
SANDY SILT
7m 7m 7.00 7m 7.00
? ? ? ?
7.50-7.95 N=2 7.50-7.95 N=5 0 95 5 24.69 LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY 7.50-7.95 N = 23
8m 8m / SILTY SAND 8m
8.50
9m 9m 9m
9.00-9.45 N=4 9.00-9.45 N = 10 LOOSE MEDIUM GREY SAND 9.00-9.45 N = 24
10m
10.30 ? 10m 10.00
? ? 10m
? 11m 10.50- 0 82 18 33.17
? 11m 10.50- N = 13 0 94 6 24.10 11m 10.50-
10.95 N=5 10.95 10.95 N = 24 MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE
CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
12m 12m 12m
12.00- LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY 12.00- 12.00-
N=9 / SILTY FINE SAND N = 17 N = 23
12.45 12.45 12.45
13m 13m 13m

14m 13.50- N = 10 14m 13.50- N = 18 14m 13.50- N = 21 0 95 5 24.77


13.95 13.95
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM 13.95
14.50
? 15m
? ? 15m
GREY CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
15m
15.00- 0 98 2 27.06 15.00- 0 95 5 21.50 15.00-
N = 13 N = 21 N = 32
15.45 15.45 15.45
16m 16m 16m 16.00

17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50-


N = 15 N = 23 N = 26
16.95 16.95 16.95

18m MEDIUM DENSE GREY 18m 18m


18.00- 0 98 2 24.31 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY 18.00- 18.00-
N = 19 N = 28 N = 25
18.45 SAND 19.00 18.45 18.45
19m
? 19m
? ? 19m
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
0 95 5 25.82 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
20m 19.50- 20m 19.50- 20m 19.50-
N = 22 N = 36 N = 24
19.95 19.95 19.95

21m 21m 21m


21.00- 21.00- 21.00-
N = 25 N = 37 N = 29
22m 22.00 21.45 22m 21.45 22m 21.45
? ?
0 99 1 26.81 DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY 1 93 6 22.82
23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 23m 22.50-
N = 33 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND N = 33 N = 29
23.50 22.95 22.95 DENSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY 23.50 22.95

24m 24m / SILTY SAND WITH TRACES OF ? 24m


?
24.00- 24.00-
GRAVEL 24.00-
N = 79 N = 38 N = 30
24.34 24.45 24.45
25m 25m 25m

25.50- 0 96 4 24.06 DENSE MEDIUM GREY


26m N = 91 26m 25.50- 26m 25.50-
25.815 N = 37 N = 30 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
25.95 25.95
SAND
27m 27m 27m
27.00- 27.00- 27.00-
N = 120 N = 38 N = 33
27.275 27.45 27.45
28m
VERY DENSE GREY CLAYEY /
28m 28.00
? 28m 28.00
? ?
29m 28.50- SILTY SAND 29m 28.50- 0 96 4 24.99 29m 28.50- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
N = 88 N = 57 N = 29
28.82 28.95 28.95 SAND
29.50
30m 30m
? 30m ?
30.00- 0 97 3 25.95 30.00- DENSE MEDIUM GREY SAND
N = 130 N = 61 VERY DENSE MEDIUM GREY 30.00-
30.265 30.395 N = 32
31m 31m 31m 31.00 30.45
SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
SAND ? ? ?
32m 31.50- 32m 31.50- 32m 31.50- 0 86 14 24.02
N = 88 N = 63 N = 22
31.82 31.89 31.95

33m 33m 33m


33.00- 33.00- 33.00-
N = 143 N = 88 N = 24
33.255 33.32 33.45
34m 34m 34.00 34m
34.755 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
? 34.50-
34.755
N = 125 ?
0 96 4 26.05
RBH1 TERMINATED AT 34.755m
? 35m 34.50-
34.87
N = 68
0 93 7 23.05 35m 34.50-
34.95
N = 26 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND

BELOW GROUND LEVEL


36m 36m
36.00- VERY DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY 36.00-
N = 68 N = 28
36.37 CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 36.45
37m 37m

37.50- 37.50-
38m N = 86 38m N = 27
37.825 37.95
38.50
39m 39m
39.27
? 39.00-
39.27
N = 100 ? BBH3 TERMINATED AT 39.27m
? 39.00-
39.45
N = 26
0 96 4 27.33
40m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
41m 40.50- SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
N = 26
40.95 SAND
42m
42.00-
N = 28
42.45
43.00
? 43m
?
DENSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
44m 43.50-
N = 31 SAND
43.95
? 45m
44.50
?
45.00- 0 96 4 25.44
N = 28
45.95 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
46m
GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
? 47m 46.50-
N = 27
SILTY FINE SAND
?
46.95
47.50
48m
48.00-
N = 30
48.45
49m
DENSE MEDIUM GREY
50m 49.50- 0 96 4 26.19 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
N = 30
49.95
SAND
51m
51.00-
N = 32
51.45
52m
52.50
? 53m 52.50- 0 94 6 26.94
?
N = 24
52.95

54m
54.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
N = 27
54.45 GREY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
55m
SAND

56m 55.50-
N = 29
56.50 55.95
? 57m
? ?
57.00-
N = 34
57.45 DENSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
58m
SAND
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE : 59m 58.50-
SOIL PROFILE 5 ? 60m
59.50
60.00
58.95
N = 30

MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM


?
SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT SCALE 1 : 150 (A1)
?
60.45 60.00-
60.45
N = 29 ? 0 97 3 36.94 GREY FINE SAND
?
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
1 : 300 (A3) GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
SILTY FINE SAND
BBH2 TERMINATED AT 60.45m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 5
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 673m APPROX. 971m

BBH1 PBH5 DBH5

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL DARK BROWN PEAT
? ? 0.20
0.00-0.20 NIL MEDIUM BROWN FINE SAND
WITH SOME WOOD
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL DARK BROWN PEAT
?
1m SOFT BROWN SLIGHTLY 1m 1m
SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF SOFT LIGHT GREY SANDY
1.50-1.95 N=4 0 20 60 20 50.76 DECAYED WOOD 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 61 0 135.69 1.50-1.95 N=4 6 48 41 5 29.45 SILT WITH TRACES OF
? 2m
2.00 ? 2m
VERY LOOSE LIGHT BROWN
2m
GRAVEL
FINE SAND WITH ROOTS AND
3m 3m DECAYED MATTER 3m 3.00
LOOSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
3.00-3.45 N=8 3.00-3.45 N=0 3.00-3.45 N=0 TOO PEATY 299.65
SAND
4.00 VERY SOFT DARK BROWN
4m 4m 4.00 4m
? ? ? ? ? PEAT

5m 4.50-4.95 N = 10 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 0 12 65 23 121.21


? 5m
4.50
4.50-4.95 N=0 ?
VERY SOFT SLIGHTLY SANDY
SILT WITH SOME DECAYED
6m 6m MATTERS 6m VERY LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
6.00-6.45 N = 18 6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.45 N=2 CLAYEY SAND

7m 7m 7.00 7m 7.00
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
? ? ?
8m 7.50-7.95 N = 19 GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / 8m 7.50-7.95 N=0 0 60 27 13 19.97 8m 7.50-7.95 N=2 0 19 58 23 63.47
SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
SILTY FINE SAND WITH VERY SOFT LIGHT GREY SAND SILT
TRACES OF GRAVEL SILT 9.00
9m 9m 9m
9.00-9.45 N = 22 2 95 3 28.18 9.00-9.45 N=0 ? 9.00-9.45 N=6 ?
10m
? 10m 10.00
? ? 10m

10.50- 10.50- 8 90 2 20.57 10.50-


11m N = 22 11m N=4 11m N=6
10.95 10.95 10.95

12m 12m LOOSE LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY 12m


12.00- 12.00- CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 12.00- FIRM DARK GREY SILT WITH
N = 29 N=5 N=5 0 0 69 31 69.66
12.45 12.45 WITH TRACE OF GRAVEL 12.45 TRACES OF DECAYED
13m 13.00 13m 13m MATTERS

14m 13.50- N = 23 0 99 1 28.27 14m 13.50- N=7 14m 13.50- N=6


13.95 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM 13.95 13.95

15m
GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
SILTY SAND ? 15m
14.50
? ? 15m
15.00- 15.00- 0 100 0 18.63 15.00-
N = 26 N = 11 N=5
15.45 15.45 15.45
16.00 16.00
? 16m
? LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
16m
? 16m
?
17m 16.50- 0 98 2 27.96 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /SILTY FINE 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 0 74 21 5 24.74
N=7 N = 15 N=0
17.50 16.95 SAND 16.95 16.95
? 18m
? 18m MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY 18m
VERY LOOSE LIGHT GREY
VERY SILTY FINE SAND
18.00- 18.00- FINE SAND 18.00-
N = 10 N = 17 N=0
19m 18.45 19m 18.45 19m 18.45
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 19.50
20m 19.50-
N = 10
0 80 20 28.69 20m 19.50-
N = 23
0 100 0 22.14 ? 20m 19.50-
N = 16
0 98 2 25.33 ?
19.95 19.95 19.95

21m 21.00 21m 21m


? 21.00- 0 36 40 24 48.25 ? 21.00- 21.00-
N=5 FIRM GREY SANDY SILT N = 28 N = 20
21.45 21.45 21.45
?
22m 22.00
? ? ? 22m 22.00
?
22m
MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY
23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 2 23 57 18 22.80 23m 22.50- 0 97 3 25.27
N = 18 N = 33 N = 19 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
22.95 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 22.95 HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY 22.95
SAND
FINE SAND SANDY CLAY WITH TRACES
24m 24m 24m
OF GRAVEL
24.00- 24.00- 24.00-
N = 21 N = 81 N = 22
25m 25.00 24.45 25m 25.00 24.335 25m 24.45
? ?
25.50- 5 25 49 21 45.86 25.50- 3 24 49 24 15.95 HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY 25.50-
26m N = 10 26m N = 111 26m N = 24
25.95 STIFF BROWN SLIGHTLY 25.785 SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF 26.50 25.95
SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL
27m GRAVEL 27m 27m
27.245
27.00-
27.45
N = 12 ? 27.00-
27.245
N = 120 ? PBH5 TERMINATED AT 27.245m ? 27.00-
27.45
N = 23
0 94 6 23.89
28.00
?
28m
? ? BELOW GROUND LEVEL 28m
MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY
29m 28.50- 0 70 20 10 23.95 29m 28.50- CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
N = 18 N = 25
28.95 MEDIUM DENSE GREY VERY 28.95

30m SILTY SAND 30m

31.00
30.00-
30.45
N = 22 ? 30.45 30.00-
30.45
N = 28 ? DBH5 TERMINATED AT 30.45m
?
31m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
32m 31.50- 0 97 3 25.18
N = 24
31.95

33m MEDIUM DENSE GREY


33.00- SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
N = 26
33.45 SAND
34m

35m 34.50-
N = 27
34.95

36m 36.00
? 36.00-
N = 34
?
36.45 DENSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
37m
GREY CLAYEY FINE SAND
37.50
? 38m 37.50- 0 94 6 30.42 ?
N = 28 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
37.95
CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND
39.00
? 39m
39.00-
N = 31
?
39.45
40m

40.50- DENSE MEDIUM GREY FINE


41m N = 31
40.95 SAND

42m
42.00-
N = 31
42.45
? 43m 43.00
? MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
44m 43.50-
43.95
N = 27
0 96 4 28.07 GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
SILTY FINE SAND
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :
44.50
? 45m
?
45.00-
DENSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
N = 30 FINE SAND
46m 46.00
45.45 SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT
47m 46.50- DENSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
N = 36
46.95 GREY CLAYEY SAND

? 48m 48.00
48.00- 0 40 40 20 31.83 ? HARD GREY SANDY SILT ? SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE
N = 51
48.445
49m 49.00
? ?
50m 49.50-
N = 55
49.925 CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE
VERY DENSE BROWNISH
51m MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY SAND
51.00-
N = 63
51.39
52m

52.50-
SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE
53m N = 71
52.86

54m 54.00
54.00- 0 97 3 24.44
N = 32
55m
54.45 MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD
56m 55.50- DENSE MEDIUM GREY
N = 35
55.95 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
SAND
57m
57.00-
NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined
N = 37
58m 58.00
57.45
Symbols. c.g.
59m 58.50- 0 95 5 24.39 DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
N = 37
59.50
58.95 FINE SAND
silty SAND
60m DENSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
60.45 GREY CLAYEY FINE SAND
? 60.00-
60.45
N = 42 ? BBH1 TERMINATED AT 60.45m ?
BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SOIL PROFILE 6
SCALE 1 : 150 (A1)
1 : 300 (A3)

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 6
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 971m APPROX. 1558m

PBH4 DBH4 PBH3

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
RQD % DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20
0.00-0.20 NIL ? DARK BROWN CLAY WITH
DECAYED WOOD
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL
? DARK BROWN PEAT ? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL
DARK BROWN CLAY WITH
DECAYED WOOD
?
1m 1m 1m
FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 TOO PEATY 340.99 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 0 66 34 111.28 2m 1.50-1.95 N=5 0 6 79 15 54.32
SILT
VERY SOFT DARK BROWN VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
3m
PEAT
3m
ORGANIC MATTER ? 3m
2.50
? ?
3.00-3.45 N=0 3.00-3.45 N=0 3.00-3.45 N=6 0 66 23 11 34.74 LOOSE MEDIUM GREY VERY
SILTY SAND
4m 4.00 4m 4.00 4m 4.00
? ?
STIFF LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 0 0 82 18 140.00 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 0 0 73 27 68.46 5m 4.50-4.95 N=8 0 11 64 25 62.55
VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN SANDY SILT

6m 6m
CLAY WITH ORGANIC MATTER
? 6m
5.50
? ?
6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.45 N=7
VERY SOFT BROWN SILT WITH
7m 7m 7.00 7m
DECAYED WOODS

N=0 N=4
SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY N=7
8m 7.50-7.95 0 0 79 21 67.15 8m 7.50-7.95 0 1 76 23 76.46 8m 7.50-7.95 0 90 10 27.98
SILT WITH DECAYED WOODS
8.50 LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
9m 9m 9m / SILTY SAND
9.00-9.45 N=0 9.00-9.45 N=0
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH 9.00-9.45 N=9
0 0 88 12 74.87
ORGANIC MATTER
10.00 10.00
?
10m
? ?
10m
? ? 10m

11m 10.50- 11m 10.50- 0 0 71 29 124.96 11m 10.50-


10.95 N = 10 N=5 N=7
10.95 10.95

12m
STIFF GREY SILT WITH
DECAYED WOODS 12m
FIRM GREY SILT WITH
DECAYED WOOD ? 12m
11.50
?
12.00- 12.00- 12.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
N=8 0 0 72 28 82.57 N=6 N = 11 0 90 10 23.99
12.45 12.45 12.45 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
13m 13.00 13m 13.00 13m 13.00
? ? ? LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
?
14m 13.50- N=0 14m 13.50- N=7 14m 13.50- N=8 0 90 3 24.94 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
13.95 13.95 13.95 SAND
14.50
15m
DECAYED WOODS
15m ? 15m
?
15.00- 15.00- 0 23 50 27 29.53
FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY 15.00-
N=0 N=5 SILT N = 10
15.45 15.45 15.45
16m 16.00 16m 16m
? ? ? STIFF TO VERY STIFF GREY
17m 16.50-
N=7
0 0 61 39 58.73 17m 16.50-
N=7
? 17m 16.50-
N = 16
3 22 62 13 44.02 SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT WITH ?
16.95 FIRM TO STIFF MEDIUM GREY 17.50 16.95 16.95 TRACES OF GRAVEL
18m CLAY WITH DECAYED WOODS 18m 18m
0 25 55 20 30.19
FIRM LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
18.00- 18.00- 18.00-
N=9 N=6 SANDY CLAY N = 19
19m 19.00 18.45 19m 19.00 18.45 19m 19.00 18.45

? ? ? ?
FIRM LIGHTLY GREY SANDY STIFF GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
20m 19.50- 0 79 18 3 19.28 20m 19.50- 1 55 25 19 31.72 20m 19.50- 0 7 69 24 53.51
N = 10 N=7 SILT WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL N=9 SILT
19.95 MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY 20.50 19.95 20.50 19.95

21m
VERY SILTY SAND ? 21m
? ? 21m ?
MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY
21.00- 21.00- FINE SAND 21.00-
N = 13 N = 18 N = 17
22m 22.00 21.45 22m 22.00 21.45 22m 21.45

? ?
23m 22.50- 0 4 65 31 18.34 23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 0 97 3 25.93
N = 53 N = 54 N = 10
22.935 22.93 HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTY 22.95
HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF
24m 24m 24m
24.00-
SANDY CLAY 4 15 47 34 19.46 GRAVEL
24.00- 24.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
24.395 N = 77 N = 51 N = 15
25m 25m 24.445 25m 24.45 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
SAND

?
25.845 25.50-
25.845 N = 56 ? DBH4 TERMINATED AT 25.92m ? ? 25.92 25.50-
25.92
N = 56 ? ? 26m 25.50-
25.95
N = 20
DBH4 TERMINATED AT 25.92m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL 27m
27.00-
N = 17
28m 27.45

29m 28.50- 0 98 2 26.31


N = 17
28.95

30m

?
30.45 30.00-
30.45
N = 18 ? ?
PBH3 TERMINATED AT 30.45m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SOIL PROFILE 7
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :

SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT

SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 7
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 991m APPROX. 1068m

DBH3 PBH2 DBH2

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL DARK BROWN PEAT
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? 0 1 85 14 184.73
DARK BROWN SILT WITH
SOME ROOTS
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? 0 1 80 19 185.03
VERY SOFT BROWN SLIGHTLY ?
1m 1m 1m SANDY SILT WITH DECAYED
VERY SOFT DARK BROWN 1.20
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY MATTER
PEAT WITH DECAYED WOOD
1.50-1.95 N=5 TOO PEATY 699.03 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 25 63 12 63.48 SANDY SILT WITH SOME 1.50-1.95 N=0
?
2m 2.00
? 2m
2.50 DECAYED MATTERS
2m

3m FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY


? 3m ? ? 3m VERY SOFT GREY SILT
3.00-3.45 N=7 0 12 61 27 66.01 CLAY 3.00-3.45 N=2 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 69 31 87.41
VERY LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
4m 4.00 4m 4m 4.00
? ? ? VERY SILTY FINE SAND WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED
5m 4.50-4.95 N=5 0 80 16 4 35.85 5m 4.50-4.95 N=2 0 72 18 10 33.82 MATTERS 5m 4.50-4.95 N=4

LOOSE MEDIUM GREY VREY 5.50


6m SILTY FINE SAND 6m 6m
6.00-6.45 N=6 6.00-6.45 N=8 6.00-6.45 N=3 0 0 78 22 113.25 SOFT DARK GREY SILT

7m 7.00 7m LOOSE MEDIUM GREY FINE 7m


CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND
LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
8m 7.50-7.95 N=4 0 96 4 26.24 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE 8m 7.50-7.95 N=7 0 94 6 29.42 8m 7.50-7.95 N=4
8.50 SAND 8.50 ? 8.20
? ?
9m 9m LOOSE MEDIUM GREY FINE 9m
LOOSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
9.00-9.45 N=5 9.00-9.45 N=6 SAND WITH TRACES OF 9.00-9.45 N=5
SAND FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
DECAYED MATTERS
? 10m 10.00
? ?
10m 10.00 10m SILT WITH SOME DECAYED
MATTER
10.50- 0 71 19 10 26.73 10.50- LOOSE MEDIUM GREY FINE 10.50- 0 2 68 30 62.32
11m N = 16 11m N=7 11m N=5
10.95 10.95 SAND 10.95
11.50
12m ? 12m ? ? ? 12m
11.70
? ?
12.00- N = 22 12.00- N = 11 1 80 19 26.05 12.00- N=6
12.45 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 12.45 12.45
13m VERY SILTY FINE SAND 13m 13m
LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
14m 13.50- N = 16 14m 13.50- N = 12 14m 13.50- N=8 / SILTY SAND
13.95 13.95 13.95
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
15m 15m GREY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE 15m
15.00- 15.00- SAND WITH TRACES OF 15.00- 0 91 9 28.11
N = 19 N = 15 N=7
15.45 15.45 15.45
GRAVEL
16m 16.00 16m
? 16m 16.00
? ?
0 93 7 26.92
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50-
N = 20 N = 19 N = 11 SILTY FINE SAND
16.95 17.50 16.95 17.50 16.95

18m 18m 18m


18.00- MEDIUM DENSE GREY CLAYEY 18.00- 0 95 5 25.82 18.00-
N = 22 N = 14 N = 13
19m 18.45 / SILTY SAND 19m 18.45 19m 18.45

20m 19.50- 20m 19.50- 20m 19.50-


N = 23 N = 15 N = 14
20.50 19.95 19.95 19.95
? 21m ? 21m 21m MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
0 94 6 26.52 DENSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
21.00- 21.00- 21.00-
N = 30 / SILTY FINE SAND N = 16 N = 18
21.45 21.45 21.45
?
22m 22.00 ? 22m 22m

23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- MEDIUM DENSE GREY CLAYEY 23m 22.50- 0 94 6 23.63
N = 29 N = 18 / SILTY FINE SAND N = 12
22.95 22.95 22.95
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
24m CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 24m 24m
24.00- 24.00- 24.00-
N = 24 N = 19 N = 14
24.45 24.45 24.45
? 25m 25.00
? 25m 25m 25.00

DENSE MEDIUM GREY FINE 0 92 8 26.79 0 96 4 25.52


26m 25.50- 26m 25.50- 26m 25.50-
N = 39 SAND N = 14 N = 16
25.95 25.95 25.95 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
? 27m
26.50
? 27m 27m
SLIGHTLY CLAYEY FINE SAND
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
27.00- 27.00- 27.00-
N = 29 FINE SAND N = 16 N = 18
27.45 27.45 27.45
? 28m 28.00
? ? 28m 28.00
? ? ?
28m 28.00
? ?
VERY STIFF MEDIUM GREY
29m 28.50- 0 94 6 26.04 29m 28.50- 4 51 32 13 32.74 29m 28.50-
N = 33 DENSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY N = 15 VERY STIFF GREY SAND SILT N = 20 CLAY WITH FINE SAND
28.95 28.95 29.50 28.95

30m
/ SILTY FINE SAND
30m
WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL
? 30m HARD GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY ?
30.45 30.45 30.45 0 17 65 18 43.46 SILT
? 30.00-
30.45
N = 32 ? DBH3 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ? ?
30.00-
30.45
N = 19 ? PBH2 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ? ? 30.00-
30.45
N = 36 ? DBH2 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ?
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SOIL PROFILE 8
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)

LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :

SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT

SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 8
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
APPROX. 940m APPROX. 1010m

PBH1 DBH1 EBH1

MOISTURE

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
SAMPLING

SAMPLING

SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)

CONTENT

CONTENT

CONTENT
DEPTH

DEPTH

DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH

(MPa)

(MPa)

(MPa)
GRAVEL

GRAVEL

GRAVEL
UCS

UCS

UCS
LOG LOG LOG

(%)

(%)

(%)
(m)

(m)

(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

RQD %

RQD %

RQD %
TCR %

TCR %

TCR %
SAND

SAND

SAND
CLAY

CLAY

CLAY
(m) (m) (m)

SILT

SILT

SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? MEDIUM BROWN CLAY WITH
SOME OF DECAYED MATTER
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
?
0 2 83 15 115.98 GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT
WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
?
1m 1.00 1m 1.00 1m
MATTER VERY LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
CLAYEY SAND
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 3 62 35 97.46 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 2m 1.50-1.95 N=4
VERY SOFT DARK GREY 2.50
3m SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT WITH 3m 3m
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH VERY LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 1 67 32 70.96 SOME DECAYED MATTER 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 74 26 78.86 3.00-3.50 N=0
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER SAND
4m 4m 4m 4.00
? ? VERY SOFT GREY SANDY
?
5.00 4.50-4.95 N=0 4.50-4.95 N=0 4.50-4.95 N=3 CLAY WITH TRACES OF
?
5m
? ?
5m
5.50
5m
5.50 DECAYED MATTER AND WOOD
6m 6m 6m
6.00-6.50 NIL LOOSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 28 61 11 53.08 VERY SOFT SLIGHTLY SANDY 6.00-6.45 N=3
FINE SAND SILT SOFT MEDIUM GREY CLAY
7m 7m 7m
7.50 WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
7.50
? 8m 7.50-7.95 N=0 ? VERY SOFT MEDIUM GREY
? ? 8m 7.50-7.95 N=5 ? ? 8m 7.50-7.95 N=2
MATTER

8.50 SANDY CLAY


? 9m ? ? 9m 9m
8.50

9.00-9.45 N = 14 9.00-9.45 N=6 0 32 56 12 55.35 9.00-9.45 N=3 SOFT MEDIUM GREY SANDY
FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
10m MEDIUM DENSE GREY VERY 10m 10m CLAY WITH TRACES OF
SILT
SILTY SAND DECAYED MATTER
10.50- 0 79 18 3 42.99 10.50- 10.50-
11m N = 14 11m N=8 11m 11.00 N=3
10.95 10.95 10.95
11.50 11.50
12m 12m 12m
12.00- 12.00- 1 49 42 8 46.40 STIFF GREY SANDY SILT WITH 12.00-
N = 16 N = 10 N=3
12.45 12.45 TRACES OF GRAVEL 12.45
13m MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 13m 13.00 13m
CLAYEY SAND ? ? ? SOFT MEDIUM GREY CLAY
13.50- 13.50- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 13.50-
14m N = 17 14m N = 18 14m N=2
13.95 13.95 SILTY FINE SAND 13.95
14.50 14.50
? 15m VERY STIFF DARK GREY ? 15m 15m
15.00- 1 36 52 11 42.64 SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF 15.00- 15.00-
N = 18 N = 26 N=2
15.45 GRAVEL AND DECAYED 15.45 15.45
? 16m 16.00
? MATTER ? 16m
?
16m 16.00
? ?
17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50-
N = 20 N = 22 N=5
16.95 16.95 16.95

18m 18m 18m


18.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM 18.00- 0 83 17 28.28 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 18.00-
N = 22 N = 17 N=5
18.45 GREY CLAYEY SAND 18.45 CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 18.45
19m 19m 19m

20m 19.50- 20m 19.50- 20m 19.50-


N = 26 N = 17 N=5
20.50 19.95 19.95 19.95

21m 21m 21m FIRM MEDIUM GREY CLAY


21.00- 0 99 1 24.49 21.00- 21.00-
N = 24 N = 10 N=5
22m 21.45 22m 21.45 22m 21.45
MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT TO 22.50
23m 22.50-
MEDIUM GREY SLIGHTLY ? 23m 22.50-
? ? 23m 22.50-
N = 26 CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND N = 12 N=5
22.95 22.95 22.95
LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
24m 24m / SILTY FINE SAND 24m
24.00- 24.00- 0 86 14 25.12 24.00-
N = 27 N=9 N=5
25.00 24.45 25.00 24.45 24.45
? 25m
? ? ? 25m
?
25m

26m 25.50- 0 94 6 26.74 26m 25.50- 26m 25.50-


N = 33 N = 11 N=8
25.95 25.95 26.50 25.95

27m 27m 27m STIFF MEDIUM GREY CLAY


27.00- DENSE LIGHT TO MEDIUM 27.00- 27.00- WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
N = 33 N = 11 N = 11
28m 27.45 GREY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE 28m 27.45 28m 28.00 27.45 MATTER AND WOOD
STIFF MEDIUM GREY SAND
SAND
SILT ? ? ?
29m 28.50- 29m 28.50- 0 10 71 19 42.08 29m 28.50-
N = 36 N = 10 N=1
28.95 28.95 28.95

30m 30m 30m VERY LOOSE LIGHT BROWN


? 30.45 30.00-
N = 38 ? ?
30.45 30.00-
N = 12
? ?
30.00-
N=4 CLAYEY SAND
30.45 PBH1 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ? 30.45 DBH1 TERMINATED AT 30.45m 31m 30.45
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL
32m

? 33m
32.50
? ?
33.00-
N = 13
34m 33.45
STIFF MEDIUM GREY CLAY

35m
35.50
36m
36.00-
N = 14 STIFF MEDIUM GREY CLAY
37m 36.45
WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
MATTER AND WOOD
38m
38.50
SOIL PROFILE 9 ? 39m
? ?
39.00-
N = 23 MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1) 40m 39.45
ORANGE SAND
1 : 250 (A3)
41m
41.50
? 42m VERY DENSE LIGHT ORANGE
42.40 SAND
? 42.00-
42.40
N = 60
? EBH1 TERMINATED AT 42.40m
?
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE : BELOW GROUND LEVEL

SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT

SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE

CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE

SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE

MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD

NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined


Project Title : Drawing Title :
Symbols. c.g.
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION SOIL PROFILE 9
silty SAND OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
Appendix B
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
MAIN ROAD
CH0+000 - CH16+800
/
SERVICE ROAD
SERVICE ROAD UNDER BRIDGE
ROUNDABOUT/ ROUTE B / MAIN ROAD
(CH 16+800 - CH17+073.605)
ROUNDABOUT/ ROUTE B/ MAIN ROAD (CH 16+800 - CH17+073.605)

5 10kPa .---
1.187 -
5

--S --S
SAND FILL D

IT
0 0

- -·
V. LOOSE/ LOOS
��
....�· . ,-, ...
C:
-5 - ":: ::o- i;? - -5
C:
0 ;r
c,p "'"'" "'""'" .,.,,..,..., 0
� ,.,.
Chll'lg,, ,..., n -ca:;:!::;;� �
co co
{loNlln') ((kNhn')"n)

> -10 D ENID-IIJJMl '" , -


-10 >
'"" " "
00
- V.SOFT / SOFT 2
Q) D Q)
[iJ '" ' [iJ

-
D """"'- 00

D "--""""GE '" ' - -15


"
00

-15 - '
D
.•
Y.LOOS::ll.OOSE1!!.5

D Y,SOFT/SCFT'2 "' JO ,
FIRM

-20 I I I I I I I -20
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

Distance (m)

SLOPE/W Analysis
Undrained Analysis_Roundabout.gsz
15/05/2019 1:350

5
.,
10kPa .---
1.239
- 5

SAND FILL

- i�
-
0 I
0

IW
E
- .... _,,_, -,-, ..... - ..... E
V.LOOSE I LOOSE

-5
,..., ""-"" "iii�.:;:::..._ ... -5
- -

;:;;;��
C: "" ;
Top C:
0 Cha,g• M
;:; 0
� !!l(lllm'JlmJ
�:.:. .:,;: �
co ' co
> -10 - D >
ENID-111.JMl 11!.5 00
- -10
D '"" " " V.SOFT I SOFT 2
Q) Q)
[iJ D """"'- '" ' 00
[iJ
D � 18.5 ' 00

-15 - D '"""""'
\l.lOOSEI 1a5 ' " - -15

D V.SOFT/sa=T 111.5 JO ,..


RRM

-20 I I I I I I I -20
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

Distance (m)

SLOPE/W Analysis
Undrained Analysis_Roundabout_GENTLE SLOPE GRADIENT.gsz
15/05/2019 1:350
Appendix C
CONSOLIDATION
SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 1
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 2.00 m fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

U1 5 10.20 10.20 2.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 37.00 67 2.30 66.15 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.256 29.41 0.0084 10.34 0.026 10.21

10.20 0.256

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

U1 5 10.2 10.2 2.04 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 37.68 67 2.30 66.83 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.259 29.41 0.0082 10.21 0.03 10.21

0.259

2) 0.036 m topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

U1 5 10.2 10.2 2.04 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 37.68 67 2.30 66.83 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.259 29.41

0.259
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 1

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT


Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

2 m fill

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.50 th 0.29 0.0084 10.34 0.03 10.21

Topping up to Finished Platform Level

4.00 th 0.33 0.0094 10.94 0.03 10.94

Post Construction

Year 1 1.33 0.0382 22.07 0.06 22.07

Year 2 2.33 0.0671 29.23 0.08 29.23

Year 3 3.33 0.0959 34.95 0.09 34.95

Year 5 5.33 0.1536 44.23 0.11 44.23

Year 7 7.33 0.2112 51.91 0.13 51.91

Year 10 10.33 0.2978 61.08 0.16 61.08

Year 20 20.33 0.5861 80.91 0.21 80.91

Year 30 30.33 0.8745 90.62 0.24 90.62

Year 40 40.33 1.1628 95.38 0.25 95.38

Year 50 50.33 1.4512 97.70 0.25 97.70

Year 60 60.33 1.7395 98.85 0.26 98.85

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.259 m


PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 1

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 2.00 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 0.26 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction Height* (m)
2 m fill
3.50 th 0.03 2.00 2.00 1.97 1.97 10.21

Topping up to Finished Platform Level


4.00 th 0.03 0.04 ** 2.04 2.01 2.01 10.94

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 0.03 10.94 231 0

Year 1 0.06 22.07 202 29

Year 2 0.08 29.23 184 47

Year 3 0.09 34.95 169 62

Year 5 0.11 44.23 145 86

Year 7 0.13 51.91 125 106

Year 10 0.16 61.08 101 130

Year 20 0.21 80.91 50 182

Year 30 0.24 90.62 24 207

Year 40 0.25 95.38 12 219

Year 50 0.25 97.70 6 225

Year 60 0.26 98.85 3 228

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 2
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 3.50 m fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

U1 5 10.20 10.20 3.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 64.75 67 2.30 93.90 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.915 29.41 0.0144 13.53 0.124 12.82

10.20 0.915

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

U1 5 10.2 10.2 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 67.22 67 2.30 96.37 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.965 29.41 0.0129 12.82 0.12 12.82

0.965

2) 0.134 m topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

U1 5 10.2 10.2 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 67.22 67 2.30 96.37 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.965 29.41

0.965
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 2

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT


Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

3.5 m fill

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

6.00 th 0.50 0.0144 13.53 0.12 12.82

Topping up to Finished Platform Level

6.50 th 0.49 0.0142 13.41 0.13 13.41

Post Construction

Year 1 1.49 0.0430 23.40 0.23 23.40

Year 2 2.49 0.0718 30.24 0.29 30.24

Year 3 3.49 0.1007 35.77 0.35 35.77

Year 5 5.49 0.1583 44.90 0.43 44.90

Year 7 7.49 0.2160 52.44 0.51 52.44

Year 10 10.49 0.3025 61.55 0.59 61.55

Year 20 20.49 0.5909 81.13 0.78 81.13

Year 30 30.49 0.8792 90.73 0.88 90.73

Year 40 40.49 1.1676 95.43 0.92 95.43

Year 50 50.49 1.4559 97.73 0.94 97.73

Year 60 60.49 1.7443 98.87 0.95 98.87

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.965 m


PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 2

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 3.50 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 0.97 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction Height* (m)
3.5 m fill
6.00 th 0.12 3.50 3.50 3.38 3.38 12.82

Topping up to Finished Platform Level


6.50 th 0.13 0.13 ** 3.63 3.50 3.50 13.41

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 0.13 13.41 836 0

Year 1 0.23 23.40 739 96

Year 2 0.29 30.24 673 162

Year 3 0.35 35.77 620 216

Year 5 0.43 44.90 532 304

Year 7 0.51 52.44 459 377

Year 10 0.59 61.55 371 465

Year 20 0.78 81.13 182 654

Year 30 0.88 90.73 90 746

Year 40 0.92 95.43 44 792

Year 50 0.94 97.73 22 814

Year 60 0.95 98.87 11 825

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 3
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 5.00 m fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

U1 5 10.20 10.20 5.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 92.50 67 2.30 121.65 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.417 29.41 0.0204 16.12 0.228 15.38

10.20 1.417

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

U1 5 10.2 10.2 5.24 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 96.91 67 2.30 126.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.486 29.41 0.0186 15.38 0.23 15.38

1.486

2) 0.238 m topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

U1 5 10.2 10.2 5.24 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 96.91 67 2.30 126.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.486 29.41

1.486
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 3

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT


Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

5 m fill

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

8.50 th 0.71 0.0204 16.12 0.23 15.38

Topping up to Finished Platform Level

9.00 th 0.69 0.0198 15.88 0.24 15.88

Post Construction

Year 1 1.69 0.0486 24.88 0.37 24.88

Year 2 2.69 0.0775 31.42 0.47 31.42

Year 3 3.69 0.1063 36.86 0.55 36.86

Year 5 5.69 0.1640 45.71 0.68 45.71

Year 7 7.69 0.2216 53.07 0.79 53.07

Year 10 10.69 0.3082 62.10 0.92 62.10

Year 20 20.69 0.5965 81.39 1.21 81.39

Year 30 30.69 0.8849 90.86 1.35 90.86

Year 40 40.69 1.1732 95.49 1.42 95.49

Year 50 50.69 1.4616 97.77 1.45 97.77

Year 60 60.69 1.7499 98.89 1.47 98.89

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.486 m


PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 3

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 5.00 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 1.49 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction Height* (m)
5 m fill
8.50 th 0.23 5.00 5.00 4.77 4.77 15.38

Topping up to Finished Platform Level


9.00 th 0.24 0.24 ** 5.24 5.00 5.00 15.88

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 0.24 15.88 1250 0

Year 1 0.37 24.88 1116 134

Year 2 0.47 31.42 1019 231

Year 3 0.55 36.86 938 312

Year 5 0.68 45.71 807 443

Year 7 0.79 53.07 697 553

Year 10 0.92 62.10 563 687

Year 20 1.21 81.39 277 973

Year 30 1.35 90.86 136 1114

Year 40 1.42 95.49 67 1183

Year 50 1.45 97.77 33 1217

Year 60 1.47 98.89 17 1233

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 4
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 2.00 m fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 2.00 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 37.00 28 6.30 41.38 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.276 2.26 0.1094 37.40 0.851 32.46
U1 7 6.00 6.00 2.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 37.00 67 2.55 63.25 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.162 10.18 0.0243 17.59 0.028 7.58

2.437

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 2.91 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 53.83 28 6.30 58.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.621 2.26 0.0827 32.46 0.85 32.46
U1 7 6.00 6.00 2.91 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 53.83 67 2.55 80.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.376 10.18 0.0045 7.58 0.03 7.58

2.997

3) 0.909 m topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 2.91 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 53.83 28 6.30 58.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.621 2.26
U1 7 6.00 6.00 2.91 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 53.83 67 2.55 80.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.376 10.18

2.997
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 4

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT PEAT


Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

2 m fill 2 m fill

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.50 th 0.29 0.0243 17.59 0.03 7.58 3.50 th 0.29 0.1094 37.40 0.851 32.46

Topping up to Finished Platform Level Topping up to Finished Platform Level

4.00 th 0.10 0.0080 10.09 0.04 10.09 4.00 th 0.26 0.0983 35.37 0.93 35.37

Post Construction Post Construction

Year 1 1.10 0.0913 34.11 0.13 34.11 Year 1 1.26 0.4733 74.77 1.96 74.77

Year 2 2.10 0.1747 47.21 0.18 47.21 Year 2 2.26 0.8483 90.01 2.36 90.01

Year 3 3.10 0.2580 57.10 0.21 57.10 Year 3 3.26 1.2233 96.04 2.52 96.04

Year 5 5.10 0.4247 71.55 0.27 71.55 Year 5 5.26 1.9733 99.19 2.60 99.19

Year 7 7.10 0.5913 81.15 0.30 81.15 Year 7 7.26 2.7233 99.90 2.62 99.90

Year 10 10.10 0.8413 89.83 0.34 89.83 Year 10 10.26 3.8483 100 2.62 100.00

Year 20 20.10 1.6747 98.62 0.37 98.62 Year 20 20.26 7.5983 100 2.62 100.00

Year 30 30.10 2.5080 99.70 0.37 99.70 Year 30 30.26 11.3483 100 2.62 100.00

Year 40 40.10 3.3413 99.96 0.38 99.96 Year 40 40.26 15.0983 100 2.62 100.00

Year 50 50.10 4.1747 100 0.38 100.00 Year 50 50.26 18.8483 100 2.62 100.00

Year 60 60.10 5.0080 100 0.38 100.00 Year 60 60.26 22.5983 100 2.62 100.00

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.376 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 2.621 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 4


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 3.50 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 3.00 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction Height* (m)
2 m fill
3.50 th 0.88 2.00 2.00 1.12 1.12 29.34

Topping up to Finished Platform Level


4.00 th 0.97 0.91 ** 2.91 1.94 1.94 32.20

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 0.97 32.20 2032 0

Year 1 2.09 69.68 909 1123

Year 2 2.54 84.64 460 1572

Year 3 2.73 91.16 265 1767

Year 5 2.87 95.72 128 1904

Year 7 2.92 97.55 73 1959

Year 10 2.96 98.73 38 1994

Year 20 2.99 99.83 5 2027

Year 30 3.00 99.96 1 2031

Year 40 3.00 100.00 0 2032

Year 50 3.00 100.00 0 2032

Year 60 3.00 100.00 0 2032

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 5
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 3.50 m fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 3.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 64.75 28 6.30 69.13 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.796 2.26 0.1875 48.93 1.368 43.55
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 64.75 67 2.55 91.00 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.522 10.18 0.0417 23.05 0.120 14.51

3.317

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 5.02 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 92.84 28 6.30 97.22 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.141 2.26 0.1488 43.55 1.37 43.55
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.02 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 92.84 67 2.55 119.09 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.828 10.18 0.0166 14.51 0.12 14.51

3.970

3) 1.518 m topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 5.02 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 92.84 28 6.30 97.22 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.141 2.26
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.02 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 92.84 67 2.55 119.09 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.828 10.18

3.970
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 5

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT PEAT


Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

3.5 m fill 3.5 m fill

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

6.00 th 0.50 0.0417 23.05 0.12 14.51 6.00 th 0.50 0.1875 48.93 1.368 43.55

Topping up to Finished Platform Level Topping up to Finished Platform Level

6.50 th 0.24 0.0200 15.98 0.13 15.98 6.50 th 0.44 0.1645 45.78 1.44 45.78

Post Construction Post Construction

Year 1 1.24 0.1034 36.28 0.30 36.28 Year 1 1.44 0.5395 78.58 2.47 78.58

Year 2 2.24 0.1867 48.82 0.40 48.82 Year 2 2.44 0.9145 91.50 2.87 91.50

Year 3 3.24 0.2700 58.34 0.48 58.34 Year 3 3.44 1.2895 96.60 3.03 96.60

Year 5 5.24 0.4367 72.38 0.60 72.38 Year 5 5.44 2.0395 99.25 3.12 99.25

Year 7 7.24 0.6034 81.70 0.68 81.70 Year 7 7.44 2.7895 99.91 3.14 99.91

Year 10 10.24 0.8534 90.13 0.75 90.13 Year 10 10.44 3.9145 100 3.14 100.00

Year 20 20.24 1.6867 98.66 0.82 98.66 Year 20 20.44 7.6645 100 3.14 100.00

Year 30 30.24 2.5200 99.71 0.83 99.71 Year 30 30.44 11.4145 100 3.14 100.00

Year 40 40.24 3.3534 99.96 0.83 99.96 Year 40 40.44 15.1645 100 3.14 100.00

Year 50 50.24 4.1867 100 0.83 100.00 Year 50 50.44 18.9145 100 3.14 100.00

Year 60 60.24 5.0200 100 0.83 100.00 Year 60 60.44 22.6645 100 3.14 100.00

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.828 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 3.141 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 5


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 3.50 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 3.97 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction Height* (m)
3.5 m fill
6.00 th 1.49 3.50 3.50 2.01 2.01 37.49

Topping up to Finished Platform Level


6.50 th 1.57 1.52 ** 5.02 3.45 3.45 39.56

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 1.57 39.56 2399 0

Year 1 2.77 69.75 1201 1199

Year 2 3.28 82.59 691 1708

Year 3 3.52 88.62 452 1947

Year 5 3.72 93.64 252 2147

Year 7 3.82 96.11 154 2245

Year 10 3.89 97.94 82 2317

Year 20 3.96 99.72 11 2388

Year 30 3.97 99.94 2 2397

Year 40 3.97 99.99 0 2399

Year 50 3.97 100.00 0 2399

Year 60 3.97 100.00 0 2399

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 6
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 5.00 m fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 5.00 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 92.50 28 6.30 96.88 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.138 2.26 0.2656 57.86 1.816 52.24
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 92.50 67 2.55 118.75 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.825 10.18 0.0590 27.43 0.226 19.78

3.963

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 7.07 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 130.83 28 6.30 135.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.476 2.26 0.2141 52.24 1.82 52.24
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.07 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 130.83 67 2.55 157.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.144 10.18 0.0307 19.78 0.23 19.78

4.620

3) 2.072 m topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 7.07 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 130.83 28 6.30 135.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.476 2.26
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.07 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 130.83 67 2.55 157.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.144 10.18

4.620
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 6

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT PEAT


Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

5 m fill 5 m fill

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

8.50 th 0.71 0.0590 27.43 0.23 19.78 8.50 th 0.71 0.2656 57.86 1.816 52.24

Topping up to Finished Platform Level Topping up to Finished Platform Level

9.00 th 0.41 0.0342 20.87 0.24 20.87 9.00 th 0.61 0.2298 53.97 1.88 53.97

Post Construction Post Construction

Year 1 1.41 0.1175 38.75 0.44 38.75 Year 1 1.61 0.6048 81.76 2.84 81.76

Year 2 2.41 0.2009 50.55 0.58 50.55 Year 2 2.61 0.9798 92.76 3.22 92.76

Year 3 3.41 0.2842 59.82 0.68 59.82 Year 3 3.61 1.3548 97.11 3.38 97.11

Year 5 5.41 0.4509 73.32 0.84 73.32 Year 5 5.61 2.1048 99.31 3.45 99.31

Year 7 7.41 0.6175 82.33 0.94 82.33 Year 7 7.61 2.8548 99.91 3.47 99.91

Year 10 10.41 0.8675 90.45 1.03 90.45 Year 10 10.61 3.9798 100 3.48 100.00

Year 20 20.41 1.7009 98.71 1.13 98.71 Year 20 20.61 7.7298 100 3.48 100.00

Year 30 30.41 2.5342 99.73 1.14 99.73 Year 30 30.61 11.4798 100 3.48 100.00

Year 40 40.41 3.3675 99.96 1.14 99.96 Year 40 40.61 15.2298 100 3.48 100.00

Year 50 50.41 4.2009 100 1.14 100.00 Year 50 50.61 18.9798 100 3.48 100.00

Year 60 60.41 5.0342 100 1.14 100.00 Year 60 60.61 22.7298 100 3.48 100.00

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.144 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 3.476 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 6


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 3.50 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 4.62 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction Height* (m)
5 m fill
8.50 th 2.04 5.00 5.00 2.96 2.96 44.20

Topping up to Finished Platform Level


9.00 th 2.11 2.07 ** 7.07 4.96 4.96 45.78

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 2.11 45.78 2505 0

Year 1 3.29 71.11 1335 1170

Year 2 3.80 82.31 817 1688

Year 3 4.06 87.88 560 1945

Year 5 4.29 92.88 329 2176

Year 7 4.41 95.56 205 2300

Year 10 4.51 97.64 109 2396

Year 20 4.60 99.68 15 2490

Year 30 4.62 99.93 3 2502

Year 40 4.62 99.99 0 2505

Year 50 4.62 100.00 0 2505

Year 60 4.62 100.00 0 2505

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 4.00 m of fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 4.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 74.00 67 2.55 100.24 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.969 23.92 0.0207 16.22 0.157 13.63

10.20 0.969

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 4.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 74.00 67 2.55 100.24 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.969 23.92 0.0207 16.2215 0.16 13.63

0.969

2) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 4.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 74.00 67 2.55 100.24 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.969 23.92 0.0222 16.79 0.163 14.11

0.969

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.46 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 4.46 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 82.51 67 2.55 108.75 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.111 23.92 0.1344 41.40 0.46 39.90

1.111

2) 0.46 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.46 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.46 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 82.51 67 2.55 108.75 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.111 23.92 0.1359 41.64 0.463 40.13

1.111

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.85 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.85 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 89.78 67 2.55 116.02 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.224 23.92 0.3986 69.66 0.94 81.51

1.224

3) 0.39 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.85 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.85 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 89.78 67 2.55 116.02 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.224 23.92 0.4045 70.11 0.858 74.45

1.224

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.85 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.85 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 89.78 67 2.55 116.02 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.224 23.92 0.8480 90.00 1.10 95.57

1.224
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

4) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.85 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.85 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 89.78 67 2.55 116.02 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.224 23.92 0.8539 90.14 1.104 95.72

1.224

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.60 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.60 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 85.14 67 2.55 111.37 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.153 23.92 1.1807 95.57 1.10 95.57

1.153

5) -0.251 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.60 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 4.60 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 85.14 67 2.55 111.37 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.153 23.92

1.153
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT


Month t Tv U(%) Uh (%) Uavg (%) Sp (m) % consol

3.5m fill+0.5m surcharge

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

7.00 th 0.58 0.0207 16.22 0.16 13.63

9 months rest period

7.50 th 0.63 0.0222 16.79 36.89 47.48 0.46 39.90

8.00 th 3.83 0.1359 41.64 60.17 76.76 0.85 73.98

10.00 th 11.41 0.4045 70.11 93.68 90.00 1.10 95.57

12.00 th 24.09 0.8539 90.14 99.00 90.00 1.10 95.57

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level

16.50 th 33.35 1.1822 95.59 1.10 95.59

Post Construction

Year 1 34.35 1.2176 95.98 1.11 95.98

Year 2 35.35 1.2531 96.29 1.11 96.29

Year 3 36.35 1.2885 96.59 1.11 96.59

Year 5 38.35 1.3594 97.14 1.12 97.14

Year 7 40.35 1.4303 97.57 1.13 97.57

Year 10 43.35 1.5366 98.13 1.13 98.13

Year 20 53.35 1.8911 99.11 1.14 99.11

Year 30 63.35 2.2455 99.45 1.15 99.45

Year 40 73.35 2.5999 99.79 1.15 99.79

Year 50 83.35 2.9544 99.92 1.15 99.92

Year 60 93.35 3.3088 99.96 1.15 99.96

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.153 m


PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 3.50 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 1.15 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill Height*


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction (m)

3.5m fill+0.5m surcharge


7.00 rd 0.16 4.00 4.00 3.84 3.84 13.63

9 months rest period


7.50 th 0.46 0.00 4.00 3.54 3.54 39.90

8.00 th 0.85 0.46 4.46 3.61 3.61 73.98

10.00 th 1.10 0.39 4.85 3.75 3.75 95.57

12.00 th 1.10 0.00 4.85 3.75 3.75 95.57

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level


16.50 th 1.10 -0.25 ** 4.60 3.50 3.50 95.59

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 1.10 95.59 51 0

Year 1 1.11 95.98 46 5

Year 2 1.11 96.29 43 8

Year 3 1.11 96.59 39 12

Year 5 1.12 97.14 33 18

Year 7 1.13 97.57 28 23

Year 10 1.13 98.13 22 29

Year 20 1.14 99.11 10 41

Year 30 1.15 99.45 6 44

Year 40 1.15 99.79 2 48

Year 50 1.15 99.92 1 50

Year 60 1.15 99.96 0 50

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level - soil replacement + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 8
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 5.50 m of fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 101.75 67 2.55 127.99 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.396 23.92 0.0281 18.92 0.264 16.04

10.20 1.396

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 101.75 67 2.55 127.99 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.396 23.92 0.0281 18.9172 0.26 16.04

1.396

2) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 101.75 67 2.55 127.99 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.396 23.92 0.0295 19.40 0.271 16.44

1.396

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.19 18.5 2.86


U1 4.50 9.20 9.20 6.19 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 114.44 67 2.55 140.68 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.561 23.92 0.1515 43.93 0.69 41.65

1.561

2) 0.69 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.19 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 6.19 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 114.44 67 2.55 140.68 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.561 23.92 0.1530 44.14 0.689 41.85

1.561

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.71 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 6.71 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 124.21 67 2.55 150.45 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.679 23.92 0.4357 72.31 1.31 79.25

1.679

3) 0.53 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.71 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 6.71 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 124.21 67 2.55 150.45 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.679 23.92 0.4416 72.71 1.221 74.11

1.679

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.01 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 7.01 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 129.70 67 2.55 155.94 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.742 23.92 0.7348 86.76 1.51 91.74

1.742
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 8
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

4) 0.30 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.01 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 7.01 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 129.70 67 2.55 155.94 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.742 23.92 0.7407 86.96 1.514 91.95

1.742

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.57 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 6.57 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 121.50 67 2.55 147.73 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.647 23.92 1.1439 95.17 1.57 95.17

1.647

5) -0.444 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

SF 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.57 18.5 2.86


U1 4.5 9.20 9.20 6.57 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.24 121.50 67 2.55 147.73 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.647 23.92

1.647
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 8

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT


Month t Tv U(%) Uh (%) Uavg (%) Sp (m) % consol

5m fill+0.5m surcharge

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

9.50 th 0.79 0.0281 18.92 0.26 16.04

9 months rest period

10.00 th 0.83 0.0295 19.40 36.89 49.13 0.69 41.65

10.50 th 4.32 0.1530 44.14 60.17 77.75 1.21 73.71

12.50 th 12.46 0.4416 72.71 93.68 90.00 1.51 91.74

14.50 th 20.90 0.7407 86.96 99.00 90.00 1.57 95.17

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level

19.00 th 32.31 1.1453 95.18 1.57 95.18

Post Construction

Year 1 33.31 1.1808 95.58 1.57 95.58

Year 2 34.31 1.2162 95.97 1.58 95.97

Year 3 35.31 1.2517 96.28 1.59 96.28

Year 5 37.31 1.3226 96.89 1.60 96.89

Year 7 39.31 1.3934 97.35 1.60 97.35

Year 10 42.31 1.4998 98.00 1.61 98.00

Year 20 52.31 1.8542 99.07 1.63 99.07

Year 30 62.31 2.2087 99.41 1.64 99.41

Year 40 72.31 2.5631 99.75 1.64 99.75

Year 50 82.31 2.9175 99.92 1.65 99.92

Year 60 92.31 3.2720 99.95 1.65 99.95

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.647 m


PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 8


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 5.00 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 1.65 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill Height*


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction (m)

5m fill+0.5m surcharge
9.50 rd 0.26 5.50 5.50 5.24 5.24 16.04

9 months rest period


10.00 th 0.69 0.00 5.50 4.81 4.81 41.65

10.50 th 1.21 0.69 6.19 4.97 4.97 73.71

12.50 th 1.51 0.53 6.71 5.20 5.20 91.74

14.50 th 1.57 0.30 7.01 5.44 5.44 95.17

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level


19.00 th 1.57 -0.44 ** 6.57 5.00 5.00 95.18

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 1.57 95.18 79 0

Year 1 1.57 95.58 73 6

Year 2 1.58 95.97 66 13

Year 3 1.59 96.28 61 18

Year 5 1.60 96.89 51 28

Year 7 1.60 97.35 44 36

Year 10 1.61 98.00 33 46

Year 20 1.63 99.07 15 64

Year 30 1.64 99.41 10 70

Year 40 1.64 99.75 4 75

Year 50 1.65 99.92 1 78

Year 60 1.65 99.95 1 79

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level - soil replacement + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 9
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 2.50 m of fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 65.75 28 1.00 73.42 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.572 0.14 1.7500 98.89 0.566 91.59
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 2.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 65.75 67 2.55 92.00 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.534 10.18 0.0243 17.59 0.094 13.41

10.00 1.106

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.16 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 3.16 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 77.96 28 1.00 85.63 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.611 0.14 0.9702 92.59 0.57 91.59
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 3.16 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 77.96 67 2.55 104.21 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.676 10.18 0.0152 13.8962 0.09 13.41

1.287

2) 0.66 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.16 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 3.16 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 77.96 28 1.00 85.63 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.611 0.14 1.2202 96.01 0.587 94.97
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 3.16 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 77.96 67 2.55 104.21 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.676 10.18 0.0187 15.40 0.104 14.85

1.287

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.16 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 3.16 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 77.96 28 1.00 85.63 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.611 0.14 1.2202 96.01 0.59 94.97
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 3.16 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 77.96 67 2.55 104.21 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.676 10.18 0.1702 46.61 0.32 44.96

1.287

3) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.16 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.16 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 77.96 28 1.00 85.63 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.611 0.14 1.4702 97.82 0.598 96.76
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.16 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 77.96 67 2.55 104.21 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.676 10.18 0.1737 47.09 0.318 45.43

1.287

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.63 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.63 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 86.69 28 1.00 94.35 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.636 0.14 1.0577 94.04 0.60 96.76
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 86.69 67 2.55 112.94 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.768 10.18 0.3965 69.50 0.61 86.47

1.404

4) 0.47 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.63 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.63 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 86.69 28 1.00 94.35 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.636 0.14 1.3077 96.76 0.615 99.56
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 86.69 67 2.55 112.94 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.768 10.18 0.4000 69.77 0.536 76.44

1.404
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 9
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.63 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.63 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 86.69 28 1.00 94.35 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.636 0.14 1.3077 96.76 0.62 99.56
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 86.69 67 2.55 112.94 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.768 10.18 0.8480 90.00 0.69 98.60

1.404

5) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.63 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.63 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 86.69 28 1.00 94.35 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.636 0.14 2.3077 99.51 0.633 102.39
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 86.69 67 2.55 112.94 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.768 10.18 0.8619 90.32 0.693 98.96

1.404

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.28 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.28 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 80.24 28 1.00 87.91 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.618 0.14 0.9715 92.61 0.57 92.61
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.28 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 80.24 67 2.55 106.49 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.701 10.18 1.6695 98.60 0.69 98.60

1.319

6) -0.348 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.28 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 3.28 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 80.24 28 1.00 87.91 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.618 0.14
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.28 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 80.24 67 2.55 106.49 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.701 10.18

1.319
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 2m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 9

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT PEAT


Month t Tv U(%) Uh (%) Uavg (%) Sp (m) % consol Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

2m fill+1m surcharge 2m fill+1m surcharge

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.50 th 0.29 0.0243 17.59 0.09 13.41 3.50 th 0.29 1.7500 98.89 0.566 91.59

9 months rest period 9 months rest period

4.00 th 0.22 0.0187 15.40 36.89 46.61 0.32 44.96 4.00 th 0.20 1.2202 96.01 0.59 94.97

4.50 th 2.08 0.1737 47.09 60.17 78.93 0.53 76.14 4.50 th 0.25 1.4702 97.82 0.60 96.76

5.00 th 4.80 0.4000 69.77 74.86 90.00 0.69 98.60 5.00 th 0.22 1.3077 96.76 0.62 99.56

7.00 th 10.34 0.8619 90.32 96.01 90.00 0.69 98.60 7.00 th 0.38 2.3077 90.00 0.57 92.61

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level

13.00 th 20.08 1.6730 98.62 0.69 98.62 13.00 th 0.20 1.2215 96.02 0.59 96.02

Post Construction Post Construction

Year 1 21.08 1.7563 98.91 0.69 98.91 Year 1 1.20 7.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 2 22.08 1.8396 99.06 0.69 99.06 Year 2 2.20 13.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 3 23.08 1.9230 99.14 0.69 99.14 Year 3 3.20 19.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 5 25.08 2.0896 99.30 0.70 99.30 Year 5 5.20 31.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 7 27.08 2.2563 99.46 0.70 99.46 Year 7 7.20 43.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 10 30.08 2.5063 99.70 0.70 99.70 Year 10 10.20 61.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 20 40.08 3.3396 99.96 0.70 99.96 Year 20 20.20 121.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 30 50.08 4.1730 100 0.70 100.00 Year 30 30.20 181.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 40 60.08 5.0063 100 0.70 100.00 Year 40 40.20 241.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 50 70.08 5.8396 100 0.70 100.00 Year 50 50.20 301.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Year 60 80.08 6.6730 100 0.70 100.00 Year 60 60.20 361.2215 100 0.62 100.00

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.701 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.618 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 2m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 9


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 2.00 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 1.32 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill Height*


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction (m)

2m fill+1m surcharge
3.50 th 0.66 2.50 2.50 1.84 1.84 50.04

9 months rest period


4.00 th 0.90 0.66 3.16 2.26 2.26 68.40

4.50 th 1.13 0.00 3.16 2.03 2.03 85.81

5.00 th 1.31 0.47 3.63 2.33 2.33 99.05

7.00 th 1.26 0.00 3.63 2.37 2.37 95.79

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level


13.00 th 1.28 -0.35 ** 3.28 2.00 2.00 97.40

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 1.28 97.40 34 0

Year 1 1.31 99.42 8 27

Year 2 1.31 99.50 7 28

Year 3 1.31 99.54 6 28

Year 5 1.31 99.63 5 29

Year 7 1.32 99.71 4 30

Year 10 1.32 99.84 2 32

Year 20 1.32 99.98 0 34

Year 30 1.32 100.00 0 34

Year 40 1.32 100.00 0 34

Year 50 1.32 100.00 0 34

Year 60 1.32 100.00 0 34

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level - soil replacement + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 10
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 4.00 m of fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 4.00 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 93.50 28 1.00 101.17 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.654 0.14 3.5000 99.98 0.653 93.15
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 93.50 67 2.55 119.75 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.835 10.18 0.0486 24.87 0.208 20.36

10.00 1.488

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.86 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 4.86 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 109.43 28 1.00 117.10 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.691 0.14 1.1020 94.64 0.65 93.17
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 4.86 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 109.43 67 2.55 135.68 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.977 10.18 0.0354 21.2480 0.21 20.36

1.668

2) 0.86 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.86 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 4.86 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 109.43 28 1.00 117.10 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.691 0.14 1.3520 97.10 0.671 95.59
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 4.86 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 109.43 67 2.55 135.68 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.977 10.18 0.0389 22.26 0.218 21.34

1.668

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.17 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 5.17 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 115.11 28 1.00 122.78 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.703 0.14 1.1685 95.44 0.67 95.59
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.17 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 115.11 67 2.55 141.36 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.024 10.18 0.1853 48.61 0.50 48.82

1.727

3) 0.31 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.17 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.17 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 115.11 28 1.00 122.78 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.703 0.14 1.4185 97.50 0.685 97.66
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.17 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 115.11 67 2.55 141.36 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.024 10.18 0.1887 49.08 0.503 49.30

1.727

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.50 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 121.27 28 1.00 128.94 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.715 0.14 1.2021 95.81 0.69 97.66
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 121.27 67 2.55 147.52 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.072 10.18 0.4949 76.10 0.85 83.87

1.788

4) 0.33 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.50 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 121.27 28 1.00 128.94 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.715 0.14 1.4521 97.71 0.699 99.59
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 121.27 67 2.55 147.52 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.072 10.18 0.4983 76.30 0.818 80.27

1.788
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 10
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.50 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 121.27 28 1.00 128.94 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.715 0.14 1.4521 97.71 0.70 99.59
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 121.27 67 2.55 147.52 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.072 10.18 0.8480 90.00 0.97 94.68

1.788

5) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.50 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 121.27 28 1.00 128.94 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.715 0.14 2.4521 99.65 0.713 101.57
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 121.27 67 2.55 147.52 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.072 10.18 0.8619 90.32 0.969 95.02

1.788

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.14 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.14 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 114.57 28 1.00 122.23 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.702 0.14 0.9256 91.74 0.64 91.74
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.14 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 114.57 67 2.55 140.82 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.019 10.18 1.1056 94.68 0.97 94.68

1.721

6) -0.363 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.14 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 5.14 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 114.57 28 1.00 122.23 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.702 0.14
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.14 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 114.57 67 2.55 140.82 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.019 10.18

1.721
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 10

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT PEAT


Month t Tv U(%) Uh (%) Uavg (%) Sp (m) % consol Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

3.5m fill+1m surcharge 3.5m fill+1m surcharge

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

7.00 th 0.58 0.0486 24.87 0.21 20.36 7.00 th 0.58 3.5000 100 0.654 93.17

9 months rest period 9 months rest period

7.50 th 0.47 0.0389 22.26 36.89 50.94 0.50 48.82 7.50 th 0.23 1.3520 97.10 0.67 95.59

8.00 th 2.26 0.1887 49.08 60.17 79.72 0.82 80.06 8.00 th 0.24 1.4185 97.50 0.69 97.66

8.50 th 5.98 0.4983 76.30 74.86 90.00 0.97 94.68 8.50 th 0.24 1.4521 97.71 0.70 99.59

10.50 th 10.34 0.8619 90.32 96.01 90.00 0.97 94.68 10.50 th 0.41 2.4521 90.00 0.64 91.74

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level

16.50 th 13.31 1.1091 94.73 0.97 94.73 16.50 th 0.20 1.1756 95.52 0.67 95.52

Post Construction Post Construction

Year 1 14.31 1.1925 95.71 0.98 95.71 Year 1 1.20 7.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 2 15.31 1.2758 96.49 0.98 96.49 Year 2 2.20 13.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 3 16.31 1.3591 97.14 0.99 97.14 Year 3 3.20 19.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 5 18.31 1.5258 98.09 1.00 98.09 Year 5 5.20 31.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 7 20.31 1.6925 98.68 1.01 98.68 Year 7 7.20 43.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 10 23.31 1.9425 99.16 1.01 99.16 Year 10 10.20 61.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 20 33.31 2.7758 99.91 1.02 99.91 Year 20 20.20 121.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 30 43.31 3.6091 99.99 1.02 99.99 Year 30 30.20 181.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 40 53.31 4.4425 100 1.02 100.00 Year 40 40.20 241.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 50 63.31 5.2758 100 1.02 100.00 Year 50 50.20 301.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Year 60 73.31 6.1091 100 1.02 100.00 Year 60 60.20 361.1756 100 0.70 100.00

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.019 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.702 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 10


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 3.50 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 1.72 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill Height*


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction (m)

3.5m fill+1m surcharge


7.00 th 0.86 4.00 4.00 3.14 3.14 50.04

9 months rest period


7.50 th 1.17 0.86 4.86 3.69 3.69 67.89

8.00 th 1.50 0.31 5.17 3.67 3.67 87.24

8.50 th 1.66 0.33 5.50 3.84 3.84 96.69

10.50 th 1.61 0.00 5.50 3.89 3.89 93.48

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level


16.50 th 1.64 -0.36 ** 5.14 3.50 3.50 95.05

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 1.64 95.05 85 0

Year 1 1.68 97.46 44 41

Year 2 1.69 97.92 36 49

Year 3 1.69 98.31 29 56

Year 5 1.70 98.87 19 66

Year 7 1.71 99.22 13 72

Year 10 1.71 99.50 9 77

Year 20 1.72 99.94 1 84

Year 30 1.72 99.99 0 85

Year 40 1.72 100.00 0 85

Year 50 1.72 100.00 0 85

Year 60 1.72 100.00 0 85

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level - soil replacement + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 11
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

1) 5.50 m of fill Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.50 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 5.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 121.25 28 1.00 128.92 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.715 0.14 4.7500 130.21 0.931 122.35
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 121.25 67 2.55 147.50 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.072 10.18 0.0660 28.99 0.311 24.77

10.00 1.787

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.53 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 6.53 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 140.23 28 1.00 147.89 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.750 0.14 1.1614 95.36 0.72 93.97
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.53 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 140.23 67 2.55 166.48 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.210 10.18 0.0518 25.6870 0.31 24.77

1.960

2) 1.03 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.53 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 6.53 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 140.23 28 1.00 147.89 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.750 0.14 1.4114 97.46 0.731 96.04
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.53 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 140.23 67 2.55 166.48 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.210 10.18 0.0553 26.54 0.321 25.60

1.960

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.88 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.50 1.00 1.00 6.88 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 146.78 28 1.00 154.45 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.761 0.14 1.2252 96.05 0.73 96.04
U1 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.88 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 146.78 67 2.55 173.03 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.254 10.18 0.2101 51.76 0.65 51.73

2.015

3) 0.35 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.88 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 6.88 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 146.78 28 1.00 154.45 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.761 0.14 1.4752 97.85 0.744 97.83
U1 7 6.00 6.00 6.88 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 146.78 67 2.55 173.03 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.254 10.18 0.2135 52.17 0.654 52.15

2.015

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 7.26 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 7.26 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 153.81 28 1.00 161.47 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.772 0.14 1.2682 96.42 0.74 97.83
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.26 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 153.81 67 2.55 180.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.300 10.18 0.5312 78.12 1.05 83.84

2.072

4) 0.38 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 7.26 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 7.26 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 153.81 28 1.00 161.47 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.772 0.14 1.5182 98.06 0.757 99.50
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.26 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 153.81 67 2.55 180.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.300 10.18 0.5347 78.31 1.018 81.11

2.072
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 11
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 7.26 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 7.26 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 153.81 28 1.00 161.47 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.772 0.14 1.5182 98.06 0.76 99.50
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.26 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 153.81 67 2.55 180.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.300 10.18 0.8480 90.00 1.17 93.22

2.072

5) 0.00 m of fill topping up Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 7.26 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 7.26 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 153.81 28 1.00 161.47 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.772 0.14 2.5182 99.71 0.770 101.17
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.26 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 153.81 67 2.55 180.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.300 10.18 0.8619 90.32 1.174 93.55

2.072

Ground water level: 0.00


m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ 0 kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years % m %
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90 Tv U Sp consol

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.88 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 6.88 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 146.87 28 1.00 154.53 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.761 0.14 0.9059 91.32 0.69 91.32
U1 7 6.00 6.00 6.88 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 146.87 67 2.55 173.12 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.255 10.18 1.0063 93.22 1.17 93.22

2.016

6) -0.375 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90

SF 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.88 18.5 19.50


PEAT 3.5 1.00 1.00 6.88 18.5 12.00 2.00 7.67 146.87 28 1.00 154.53 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 0.761 0.14
U1 7 6.00 6.00 6.88 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 146.87 67 2.55 173.12 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.255 10.18

2.016
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 11

CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

VERY SOFT/SOFT CLAY/SILT PEAT


Month t Tv U(%) Uh (%) Uavg (%) Sp (m) % consol Month t Tv U(%) Sp (m) % consol

5m fill+1m surcharge 5m fill+1m surcharge

0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

9.50 th 0.79 0.0660 28.99 0.31 24.77 9.50 th 0.79 4.7500 100 0.715 93.97

9 months rest period 9 months rest period

10.00 th 0.66 0.0553 26.54 36.89 53.64 0.65 51.73 10.00 th 0.24 1.4114 97.46 0.73 96.04

10.50 th 2.56 0.2135 52.17 60.17 80.95 1.02 80.91 10.50 th 0.25 1.4752 97.85 0.74 97.83

11.00 th 6.42 0.5347 78.31 74.86 90.00 1.17 93.22 11.00 th 0.25 1.5182 98.06 0.76 99.50

13.00 th 10.34 0.8619 90.32 96.01 90.00 1.17 93.22 13.00 th 0.42 2.5182 90.00 0.69 91.32

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level

19.00 th 12.12 1.0098 93.27 1.17 93.27 19.00 th 0.19 1.1559 95.30 0.73 95.30

Post Construction Post Construction

Year 1 13.12 1.0931 94.52 1.19 94.52 Year 1 1.19 7.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 2 14.12 1.1765 95.53 1.20 95.53 Year 2 2.19 13.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 3 15.12 1.2598 96.35 1.21 96.35 Year 3 3.19 19.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 5 17.12 1.4265 97.55 1.22 97.55 Year 5 5.19 31.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 7 19.12 1.5931 98.33 1.23 98.33 Year 7 7.19 43.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 10 22.12 1.8431 99.06 1.24 99.06 Year 10 10.19 61.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 20 32.12 2.6765 99.86 1.25 99.86 Year 20 20.19 121.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 30 42.12 3.5098 99.98 1.25 99.98 Year 30 30.19 181.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 40 52.12 4.3431 100 1.25 100.00 Year 40 40.19 241.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 50 62.12 5.1765 100 1.25 100.00 Year 50 50.19 301.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Year 60 72.12 6.0098 100 1.25 100.00 Year 60 60.19 361.1559 100 0.76 100.00

Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.255 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.761 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI

SCENARIO: 5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 11


CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS

Existing Ground Level = 0.00 m (Assummed)


Proposed Platform Level= 5.00 m
Ultimate settlement (Primary) = 2.02 m

Emb.Fill Cumulative Emb Total Fill Height*


Time (month) Settlement (m) RL* %Consol
Construction* Fill Construction (m)

5m fill+1m surcharge
9.50 th 1.03 5.50 5.50 4.47 4.47 50.89

9 months rest period


10.00 th 1.38 1.03 6.53 5.15 5.15 68.46

10.50 th 1.76 0.35 6.88 5.12 5.12 87.30

11.00 th 1.93 0.38 7.26 5.33 5.33 95.59

13.00 th 1.86 0.00 7.26 5.40 5.40 92.50

Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level


19.00 th 1.90 -0.38 ** 6.88 4.99 4.99 94.04

Post Construction

Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)

Year 0 1.90 94.04 120 0

Year 1 1.95 96.59 69 51

Year 2 1.96 97.22 56 64

Year 3 1.97 97.73 46 74

Year 5 1.99 98.48 31 89

Year 7 1.99 98.96 21 99

Year 10 2.00 99.41 12 108

Year 20 2.01 99.91 2 119

Year 30 2.02 99.99 0 120

Year 40 2.02 100.00 0 120

Year 50 2.02 100.00 0 120

Year 60 2.02 100.00 0 120

* Note:

Emb. Fill Construction = Fill height + previous fill settlement

Total Fill height = Cummulattive Emb. Construction - settlement

RL = Existing ground level - soil replacement + total fill height

**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
Appendix D
GROUND TREATMENT
DRAWINGS
27500 27500

5000

℄ OF ROAD
MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION

O.G.L

X
1 1
1 1

PROPOSED EARTH TOE 2000 500mm SCRUBBING BELOW EXISTING "X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT GEOTEXTILE 2000 PROPOSED EARTH TOE
DRAIN TO DETAIL DRAIN IS REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED STAGE 1 (REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND SEPARATOR DRAIN TO DETAIL
ROAD IS RUNNING ACROSS THE TREATMENT SCHEDULE)
EXISTING DRAINAGE

2000
℄ OF ROAD 2000

0.5m COMPACTED SAND FILL LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE


2 2
1 1

STAGE 2 GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR

600 600

℄ OF ROAD
EARTH FILL TO FORM COMPACTED EARTH FILL TO FORM
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. SAND FILL EARTH BUND WITH MIN.

500
15% CLAY CONTENT 15% CLAY CONTENT
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1

LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE


STAGE 3 GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR

REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION

SPOT SPOT
TURFING COMPACTED TURFING
CLOSED F.R.L SAND FILL CLOSED
TURFING TURFING

2 2
1 1
1000

1000
0.5m THICK LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE 0.5m THICK
CAPPING LAYER
STAGE 4 GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR CAPPING LAYER

PROPOSED GROUND TREATMENT TYPE A (SHEET 1 OF 2)


SCALE 1 : 100 (A1)
1 : 200 (A3)

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PROPOSED GROUND TREATMENT TYPE A
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION (SHEET 1 OF 2)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
SPECIAL EMBANKMENT

NOTES: E. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE

A. GENERAL STAGE 1
1. THE DRAWING SHALL APPLY TO SPECIAL EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTED ON SOFT CLAY OR 1. EXCAVATE DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD AS PER THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE
PEATY GROUND. DRAWINGS.

2. THE EMBANKMENT DETAILS SUCH AS THE REQUIRED COUNTER BERM, FILLING RATE AND 2. REMOVE PEAT / SOFT SOIL TO THE DEPTH INDICATED AT THE GROUND TREATMENT
GEOSYNTHETIC DETAILS ETC SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN TABLE A. SCHEDULE.

3. O.G.L. IS THE GROUND BEFORE GROUND PREPARATION STAGE. 3. LAYING ONE LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR AS PER SPECIFICATION AT THE BASE AS
SHOWN. ALLOWANCE SHALL BE GIVEN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF GROUND.
4. F.R.L. IS THE FINISHED ROAD LEVEL AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE PROFILE DRAWINGS.
4. REPLACE THE EXCAVATED PEAT / SOFT SOIL WITH SAND FILL TO O.G.L.
5. THE DRAWING AND NOTES SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATION.
5. INSTALL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION (INCLINOMETER WHEN APPLICABLE) AS PER
6. REFER TO THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR THE EXTENT AND TYPE OF SPECIAL SPECIFICATION AT THE LOCATION INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O..
EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION.

STAGE 2
B. SETTING OUT

1. ALL SURVEY SETTING OUT SHALL BE DONE BY LICENSED SURVEYOR. 1. LAY A LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF THE SAND FILL ABOVE O.G.L AS
SHOWN.
2. ALL DRAINS AND ROAD ALIGNMENT SHALL BE SET OUT BEFORE EXCAVATION / GROUND
WORK COMMENCE. 2. CONSTRUCT 0.5m OF SAND AND WRAP THE REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AROUND IT AS
SHOWN.

C. GROUND PREPARATION
STAGE 3
1. ALL CLEARINGS WITHIN THE ROAD RESERVE LIMITS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED
BEFORE FILLING OF EMBANKMENT. 1. FORMING EARTH BUND OF 500mm HEIGHT USING APPROVED CLAYEY MATERIAL (MIN. 15%
CLAY CONTENT) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE EMBANKMENT.
2. GRUBBING OF TREES AND OTHER VEGETATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SPECIFICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED. 2. CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENT USING COMPACTED SAND FILL MATERIAL WITHIN THE EARTH
BUND WITH THE FILLING RATE AS SHOWN IN TABLE A.
3. ALL TREES AND VEGETATION GRUBBED SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SPECIFICATION.

4. OPEN DRAIN EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ALIGNMENT, STAGE 4
THE DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. OPEN DRAIN MAY
NEED TO BE CLEANSE AND DEEPEN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO 1. CONTINUE TO CONSTRUCT EARTH BUND ON BOTH SIDES WHILE FILLING THE EMBANKMENT
ENSURE EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE. WITH COMPACTED SAND FILL UP TO THE FORMATION LEVEL USING THE FILLING RATES
SHOWN IN TABLE A.
5. DURING FILLING WORKS FOR THE EMBANKMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL
THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENT AT LOCATION AND TIME INTERVALS TO BE
2. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE WITH
DIRECTED BY THE S.O.. THESE RECORD SHALL BE USED BY THE S.O. TO MONITOR THE
CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.
SUITABLE RATES OF FILLING FOR EACH LIFT.
3. SUITABLE MATERIAL AS THE ONE USED FOR STABILITY BERM CONSTRUCTION (MAX. 50%
ORGANIC CONTENT) SHALL BE SPREAD ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE COUNTER BERM AS
D. INSTRUMENTATION SHOWN (CAPPING LAYER).

1. INSTRUMENTATION READINGS SHALL BE TAKEN ON WEEKLY BASIS UNTIL THE END OF 4. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT AND TURF ACCORDINGLY.
TREATMENT PERIOD OR AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O..

2. THE SUSPENSION LEVEL FOR INCLINOMETER MONITORING SHALL BE

LATERAL DISPLACEMENT
= 0.3
VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT

3. THE ALERT LEVEL FOR INCLINOMETER SHALL BE 0.7 x SUSPENSION LEVEL.

TABLE A

A1

TYPE OF EMBANKMENT
FOR EMBANKMENT FOUNDED ON SOFT
CLAY OR PEATY GROUND

SAND REPLACEMENT (X) REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE

GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (AVG) 22kN/m

SHORT TERM TENSILE STRENGTH 200kN/m


LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
120 YEARS LONG TERM TEXTILE STRENGTH 97kN/m

SHORT TERM TENSILE STRENGTH NONE


UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
120 YEARS LONG TERM TEXTILE STRENGTH NONE

RATE OF FILLING 300mm PER 2 WEEKS

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PROPOSED GROUND TREATMENT TYPE A
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION (SHEET 2 OF 2)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
27500 27500
5000

℄ OF ROAD
2000 2000
500mm SCRUBBING BELOW EXISTING
"X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT DRAIN IS REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
(REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND ROAD IS RUNNING ACROSS THE
TREATMENT SCHEDULE) EXISTING DRAINAGE GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR
O.G.L

X
1 1
1 1

PROPOSED EARTH TOE PVD AT 1.5m c/c PROPOSED EARTH TOE


GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR
DRAIN TO DETAIL TRIANGULAR GRIDS DRAIN TO DETAIL

STAGE 1
℄ OF ROAD
2000 2000 2000 2000

0.5m COMPACTED SAND FILL LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE

2 2
1 1

GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR

STAGE 2
(FOR TREATMENT TYPE B2 & B3)

℄ OF ROAD
2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
0.5m COMPACTED SAND FILL LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE

2 2
1 1

GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR

STAGE 2
(FOR TREATMENT TYPE B4 & B5)

8000 600 600 8000


STABILISING BERM STABILISING BERM
APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED SPOT
℄ OF ROAD SPOT APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED
EARTH FILL TO FORM COMPACTED EARTH FILL TO FORM
FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS TURFING TURFING FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
500

500
SAND FILL
CLOSED 15% CLAY CONTENT 15% CLAY CONTENT CLOSED
TURFING R.L R.L TURFING
1 1
2 1 1 2
1 1

LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE


GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR
UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE

STAGE 3

8000 8000
0.5m SURCHARGE ℄ OF ROAD COMPACTED
STABILISING BERM FOR 9 MONTHS SAND FILL STABILISING BERM

SURCHARGE LEVEL
APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED SPOT SPOT APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED
2 2
FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS TURFING TURFING FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS
1 1
CLOSED CLOSED
TURFING R.L R.L TURFING

2 2
1 1

LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE


GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR
UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE

STAGE 4

PROPOSED GROUND TREATMENT TYPE B (SHEET 1 OF 2)


SCALE 1 : 100 (A1)
1 : 200 (A3)

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PROPOSED GROUND TREATMENT TYPE B
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION (SHEET 1 OF 2)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION
8000 8000
STABILISING BERM COMPACTED STABILISING BERM
SPOT SPOT
TURFING SAND FILL TURFING
F.R.L
APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED SPOT APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED
2 2 SPOT
FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS TURFING FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS
1 1 TURFING
CLOSED CLOSED
TURFING R.L R.L TURFING
2 2
1 1

1000

1000
0.5m THICK LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE 0.5m THICK
CAPPING LAYER GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR CAPPING LAYER
UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE

STAGE 5

SPECIAL EMBANKMENT E. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE STAGE 4

STAGE 1 1. CONTINUE TO CONSTRUCT EARTH BUND ON BOTH SIDES WHILE FILLING THE EMBANKMENT
NOTES: WITH COMPACTED SAND FILL UP TO THE FORMATION LEVEL USING THE FILLING RATES
SHOWN IN TABLE B.
1. EXCAVATE DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD AS PER THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE
DRAWINGS. 2. CONTINUE TO FILL UP TO SURCHARGE LEVEL BY USING APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL.
A. GENERAL
2. REMOVE PEAT / SOFT SOIL TO THE DEPTH INDICATED AT THE GROUND TREATMENT
1. THE DRAWING SHALL APPLY TO SPECIAL EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTED ON SOFT CLAY OR SCHEDULE. 3. WAITING FOR SURCHARGE PERIOD AS SHOWN IN TABLE B.
PEATY GROUND.
3. LAYING ONE LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR AT THE BASE AS SHOWN. ALLOWANCE 4. PERIODIC TOPPING UP OF THE FILL TO THE SURCHARGE LEVEL SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS
2. THE EMBANKMENT DETAILS SUCH AS THE REQUIRED SURCHARGE LEVEL, STABILISING SHALL BE GIVEN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF GROUND. REQUIRED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O. OR WHEN THE FILL HAS SETTLED MORE THAN
BERM, WAITING PERIODS, FILLING RATE AND GEOSYNTHETIC DETAILS ETC SHALL BE AS 0.3m.
SHOWN IN TABLE B. 4. REPLACE THE EXCAVATED PEAT / SOFT SOIL WITH SAND FILL TO O.G.L..

3. O.G.L. IS THE GROUND BEFORE GROUND PREPARATION STAGE.


STAGE 5
5. INSTALL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION (PIEZOMETER, INCLINOMETER & SETTLEMENT
GAUGE WHEN APPLICABLE) AS PER SPECIFICATION AT THE LOCATION INSTRUCTED BY THE
4. F.R.L. IS THE FINISHED ROAD LEVEL AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE PROFILE DRAWINGS. S.O. 1. UPON MATURITY OF THE WAITING PERIOD OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O. TRIM THE
EMBANKMENT TO THE FORMATION LEVEL. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL
5. THE DRAWING AND NOTES SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATION. 6. INSTALL VERTICAL DRAINS "S" m CENTRES IN TRIANGULAR GRIDS PATTERN. SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE WITH CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.

6. REFER TO THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR THE EXTENT AND TYPE OF SPECIAL S S 2. SUITABLE MATERIAL AS THE ONE USED FOR STABILITY BERM CONSTRUCTION (MAX. 50%
EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION. ORGANIC CONTENT) SHALL BE SPREAD ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE STABILISING BERM AS
S S 0.87'S'
S SHOWN (CAPPING LAYER).

B. SETTING OUT 0.87'S' 3. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT AND TURF ACCORDINGLY.

SPACING 'S' REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE


1. ALL SURVEY SETTING OUT SHALL BE DONE BY LICENSED SURVEYOR. TABLE B
SAND FILL
2. ALL DRAINS AND ROAD ALIGNMENT SHALL BE SET OUT BEFORE EXCAVATION / GROUND
O.G.L B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
WORK COMMENCE.

SAND REPLACEMENT
C. GROUND PREPARATION TYPE OF EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT
PVD AT 'S' m c/c
GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT
1. ALL CLEARINGS WITHIN THE ROAD RESERVE LIMITS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED TRIANGULAR GRIDS CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT
BEFORE FILLING OF EMBANKMENT. PVD DETAIL GROUND GROUND GROUND GROUND GROUND
2. GRUBBING OF TREES AND OTHER VEGETATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SPECIFICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED.
STAGE 2
SAND REPLACEMENT (X) REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE
3. ALL TREES AND VEGETATION GRUBBED SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1. LAY A LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF THE SAND FILL ABOVE O.G.L AS
SPECIFICATION. SHOWN (EXCEPT TREATMENT TYPE B1).
GEOTEXTILE ULTIMATE TENSILE
22kN/m 22kN/m 22kN/m 22kN/m 22kN/m
4. OPEN DRAIN EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ALIGNMENT, 2. CONSTRUCT 0.5m OF SAND AND WRAP THE REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AROUND IT AS SEPARATOR STRENGTH (AVG)
THE DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. OPEN DRAIN MAY SHOWN. (FOR TREATMENT TYPE B2, B3, B4 & B5).
NEED TO BE CLEANSE AND DEEPEN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO
3. FOR TREATMENT TYPE B4 & B5, ADDITIONAL LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE IS SHORT TERM TENSILE
ENSURE EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE. NONE 200kN/m 400kN/m 400kN/m 400kN/m
REQUIRED AFTER THE 1ST 500mm SAND FILL. STRENGTH
LOWER REINFORCING
5. DURING FILLING WORKS FOR THE EMBANKMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL
4. nd
CONSTRUCT 0.5m OF SAND ON TOP OF THE 2 LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AND
GEOTEXTILE
THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENT AT LOCATION AND TIME INTERVALS TO BE 120 YEARS LONG TERM
DIRECTED BY THE S.O.. THESE RECORD SHALL BE USED BY THE S.O. TO MONITOR THE WRAP THE REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AROUND IT AS SHOWN. (FOR TREATMENT TYPE B4 & NONE 97kN/m 190kN/m 190kN/m 190kN/m
TEXTILE STRENGTH
SUITABLE RATES OF FILLING FOR EACH LIFT. B5).

SHORT TERM TENSILE


NONE NONE NONE 200kN/m 400kN/m
D. INSTRUMENTATION STAGE 3 STRENGTH
UPPER REINFORCING
GEOTEXTILE
1. INSTRUMENTATION READINGS SHALL BE TAKEN ON WEEKLY BASIS UNTIL THE END OF
1. FORMING EARTH BUND OF 500mm HEIGHT USING APPROVED CLAYEY MATERIAL (MIN. 15% 120 YEARS LONG TERM
CLAY CONTENT) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE EMBANKMENT. NONE NONE NONE 97kN/m 190kN/m
TREATMENT PERIOD OR AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O.. TEXTILE STRENGTH
2. CONSTRUCT THE STABILISING BERM WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL (MAX. 50%
2. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WAITING PERIOD OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O., THE
ORGANIC CONTENT AND COMPACT BY EXCAVATOR BUCKET TO MINIMUM BULK DENSITY OF RATE OF FILLING 300mm PER 2 WEEKS 300mm PER 2 WEEKS 300mm PER 2 WEEKS 300mm PER 2 WEEKS 300mm PER 2 WEEKS
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM SETTLEMENT HAS REACHED THE REQUIRED DEGREE BY
15kN/m³) TO THE SAME HEIGHT AS THE EARTH BUND AS SHOWN IN THE DRAWING.
ASAOKA METHOD OR OTHER METHOD ACCEPTABLE BY THE S.O BEFORE SURCHARGE
REMOVAL IS PERMITTED.
3. CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENT USING COMPACTED SAND FILL MATERIAL WITHIN THE EARTH
BUND WITH THE FILLING RATE AS SHOWN IN TABLE B. STABILISING BERM REDUCED LEVEL (R.L) (m) REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE
3. THE SUSPENSION LEVEL FOR INCLINOMETER MONITORING SHALL BE
4. REPEAT ITEM (1) TO (3) TO THE HEIGHT OF DESIGNATED STABILISING BERM AS SHOWN IN
LATERAL DISPLACEMENT
= 0.3 TABLE B.
VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT SURCHARGE HEIGHT 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L
5. TURF ACCORDINGLY.
THE ALERT LEVEL FOR INCLINOMETER SHALL BE 0.7 x SUSPENSION LEVEL.
WAITING PERIOD 9 MONTHS 9 MONTHS 9 MONTHS 9 MONTHS 9 MONTHS

PVD SPACING 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m

PVD MINIMUM DISCHARGE CAPACITY (KINKED) 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s

PVD LENGTH SET OR MAX. PVD DEPTH OF 'N' ('N' REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE)

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PROPOSED GROUND TREATMENT TYPE B
PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION (SHEET 2 OF 2)
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
TABLE C NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY DRAINAGE ACROSS EMBANKMENT FILL WHERE
NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION.

TYPE OF EMBANKMENT FOR SERVICE ROAD 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AND / OR TRAFFIC DIVERSION
WORKS FOR TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION.

3. REFER TO ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR FINISHED ROAD LEVELS.

4. UPON MATURITY OF THE WAITING PERIOD OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O. TRIM THE EMBANKMENT TO THE
SAND REPLACEMENT (X) REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE FORMATION LEVEL. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE
WITH CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.

GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (AVG) 22kN/m 5. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT AND TURF ACCORDINGLY.

6. THE SERVICE ROAD MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PARALLEL WITH THE MAIN ROAD.

SHORT TERM TENSILE STRENGTH 400kN/m


REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
120 YEARS LONG TERM TEXTILE STRENGTH 190kN/m

RATE OF FILLING 300mm PER 2 WEEKS

SURCHARGE HEIGHT 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L

WAITING PERIOD 9 MONTHS

PVD SPACING 1.5m

PVD MINIMUM DISCHARGE CAPACITY (KINKED) 90 x 10-6 m3/s

SET OR MAX. PVD DEPTH OF 'N' ('N' REFER TO GROUND


PVD LENGTH
TREATMENT SCHEDULE)

SERVICE ROAD SERVICE ROAD


(REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD MAIN ROAD (REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD
MIN. 3000 MIN. 3000
CROSS SECTION) VARIES (REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION) CROSS SECTION)

℄ OF ROAD

COMPACTED 0.5m SURCHARGE EARTH FILL TO FORM


SAND FILL FOR 9 MONTHS EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
EARTH FILL TO FORM SURCHARGE LEVEL 15% CLAY CONTENT
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. F.R.L
EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM
15% CLAY CONTENT 2
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. PROPOSED 600mm 2 SPOT PROPOSED 600mm EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
SPOT 1
15% CLAY CONTENT WIDE RC DRAIN 2.5% 1 2.5% TURFING WIDE RC DRAIN 15% CLAY CONTENT
TURFING 1 1
F.R.L F.R.L

500

500
CLOSED TURFING 2 1 1 2
1 1 CLOSED TURFING
600 600
1000

1000
1 1
1 1
"X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT 2000
2000
(REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND 0.5m THICK CAPPING LAYER PROPOSED EARTH TOE
PROPOSED EARTH TOE 0.5m THICK CAPPING GEOTEXTILE REINFORCING PVD AT 1.5m c/c TREATMENT SCHEDULE) TO BE APPLIED AFTER THE DRAIN TO DETAIL
DRAIN TO DETAIL LAYER TO BE APPLIED SEPARATOR GEOTEXTILE TRIANGULAR GRIDS GROUND TREATMENT OF
AFTER THE GROUND MAIN ROAD
TREATMENT OF MAIN
ROAD
TREATMENT FOR MAIN ROAD & SERVICE ROAD BEFORE OR AFTER BRIDGE APPROACH SPAN
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)

℄ OF ROAD

SERVICE ROAD SERVICE ROAD


(REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD (REFER TO TYPICAL ROAD
MIN. 6000 CROSS SECTION) MIN. 8000 MIN. 8000 CROSS SECTION) MIN. 6000
2000 2000 2000

EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
15% CLAY CONTENT F.R.L 15% CLAY CONTENT 15% CLAY CONTENT F.R.L 15% CLAY CONTENT
2 2 2 2
CLOSED CLOSED
1 1 CLOSED CLOSED 1 1
TURFING TURFING
TURFING TURFING

1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
2000 2000 2000 2000
PROPOSED EARTH TOE GEOTEXTILE "X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT "X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED EARTH TOE
SEPARATOR (REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE (REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND SEPARATOR
DRAIN TO DETAIL LINED DRAIN TO DETAIL DRAIN TO DETAIL
TREATMENT SCHEDULE) LINED DRAIN TO DETAIL TREATMENT SCHEDULE)

TREATMENT FOR SERVICE ROAD ALONG BRIDGE APPROACH SPAN


SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION TREATMENT FOR SERVICE ROAD
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0
TABLE D NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY DRAINAGE ACROSS EMBANKMENT FILL WHERE
NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
TYPE OF EMBANKMENT FOR ROUNDABOUT
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AND / OR TRAFFIC DIVERSION
WORKS FOR TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION.

3. REFER TO ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR FINISHED ROAD LEVELS.

SAND REPLACEMENT (X) 1m SAND REPLACEMENT 4. PERIODIC TOPPING UP OF THE FILL TO THE SURCHARGE LEVEL SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS REQUIRED OR
AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O. OR WHEN THE FILL HAS SETTLED MORE THAN 0.3m.

5. UPON MATURITY OF THE WAITING PERIOD OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O. TRIM THE EMBANKMENT TO THE
GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (AVG) 22kN/m FORMATION LEVEL. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE
WITH CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.

SHORT TERM TENSILE STRENGTH NONE


REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
120 YEARS LONG TERM TEXTILE STRENGTH NONE

RATE OF FILLING 300mm PER 2 WEEKS

SURCHARGE HEIGHT 0.5m ABOVE F.R.L

WAITING PERIOD 9 MONTHS

PVD SPACING 1.5m

PVD MINIMUM DISCHARGE CAPACITY (KINKED) 90 x 10-6 m3/s

SET OR MAX. PVD DEPTH OF 'N' ('N' REFER


PVD LENGTH
TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE)

ROUNDABOUT
INNER ISLAND (REFER TO TYPICAL ROUNDABOUT CROSS SECTION) MIN. 2500
5000

℄ OF ROAD
MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
COMPACTED 0.5m SURCHARGE
SPOT PROPOSED 600mm FOR 9 MONTHS SPOT
SAND FILL EARTH FILL TO FORM
TURFING WIDE RC DRAIN SURCHARGE LEVEL TURFING EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
F.R.L 600 15% CLAY CONTENT
4
1

500
CLOSED TURFING
2
1

2000
PROPOSED EARTH TOE
GEOTEXTILE 1m SAND REPLACEMENT PVD AT 1.5m c/c
DRAIN TO DETAIL
SEPARATOR TRIANGULAR GRIDS

ROUNDABOUT
(REFER TO TYPICAL ROUNDABOUT CROSS SECTION)

7500

℄ OF ROAD MIN. 2500

0.5m SURCHARGE MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION


SPOT FOR 9 MONTHS SURCHARGE LEVEL SPOT
600 600
EARTH FILL TO FORM TURFING TURFING
F.R.L
EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
15% CLAY CONTENT 4 4 EARTH FILL TO FORM
EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
1 1
EXISTING PAVEMENT 15% CLAY CONTENT
CLOSED TURFING 2000 TO BE SCRAPPED 2000 CLOSED TURFING
500

500
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
MAX.

2 2
500

1 1
2000 2000
EXISTING EARTH DRAIN
PVD AT 1.5m c/c
TRIANGULAR GRIDS EXISTING EARTH DRAIN
GEOTEXTILE 1m SAND REPLACEMENT BENCHES TO FORM STABLE KEY 1m SAND REPLACEMENT GEOTEXTILE
SEPARATOR SEPARATOR

TREATMENT FOR ROUNDABOUT


SCALE 1 : 100 (A1)
1 : 200 (A3)

Project Title : Drawing Title :


PACKAGE 01 : PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION TREATMENT FOR ROUNDABOUT
OF PASI ROAD TO SIBU / TANJUNG MANIS ROAD INCLUDING Drawing No. : Rev.
BATANG RAJANG BRIDGE, SARIKEI DIVISION - 0

You might also like