Geotechnical Write Up - 21.05.2019
Geotechnical Write Up - 21.05.2019
0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
The soil investigation (SI) works carried out by the SI Contractor, Geospec Sdn. Bhd. include
a total of 22 nos. of Boreholes (BHs), 17 nos. of Mackintosh Probe (MP) Tests and 17 nos. of
Hand Augering (HA). In addition, 3 nos. of river boreholes (WBHs) were also sunk at the exact
position of the bridge piers.. The Soil Investigation Plan is shown in Appendix A.
In general, the project area covering from the proposed Batang Rajang bridge to the Sarikei-
Bintangor T-junction mainly is underlain by a layer of soft SILT/CLAY with average thickness
of 8.2m. There are 3 boreholes, i.e. BBH5, BBH6 and DBH6 picked up 2.5m thick, 1.2m thick
and 1.0m thick of PEAT at the uppermost layer respectively. The underlying firm to stiff
SILT/CLAY has average thickness of 5.4m . SAND is occasionally found interbedded with
SILT/CLAY. Hard CLAY or very dense SAND was encountered at varying depths, i.e.
shallowest at 8.2m and deepest at 29.5m below ground level.
From the proposed Batang Rajang bridge towards the roundabout which leads to Tanjung
Manis and Sibu, the upper layer generally shows presence of soft CLAY/SILT or/and loose
SAND with average thickness of 6.8m and 5.4m respectively. The maximum thickness
intersected for soft CLAY/SILT is 10.3m below ground level. A 1.5m thick soft PEAT was
encountered underlying the soft SILT at 3.0m below ground level as shown by DBH5. On the
other hand, two boreholes PBH4 and DBH3 show uppermost layer consisting of very soft
PEAT with thickness of 4.0m and 2.0m respectively. The underlying firm to stiff SILT/CLAY
has average thickness of 7.4m. At depth of 13.0m below ground level, borehole PBH4
intersected a 3.0m thick layer of decayed wood overlying a 3.0m thick layer of firm to stiff
SILT. Dense to very dense SAND were encountered for every borehole drilled which shows
an average thickness of 17.1m. Hard CLAY or very dense SAND was encountered at depth
16.5m to 29.5m below ground level. Some boreholes were terminated before the hard or very
dense layer was encountered, especially for boreholes near the proposed roundabout because
the maximum depth for the road borehole is 30m.
The river boreholes (WBH1, WBH2 & WBH3) in overall encountered deeper depth of
dense/hard soil underlain by weathered rocks (MUDSTONE/SHALE) in the direction heading
towards Sibu/Tanjung Manis.
WBH1 shows 7.5m loose SAND followed by 43.0m thick alternating layers of firm and stiff
SILT/CLAY and a 3.0m thick layer of medium dense GRAVEL at depth of 43.0m below
ground level. 9.9m thick dense SAND was intersected following the firm to stiff ground before
encountering weathered SHALE at depth of 63.4m below ground level.
WBH2 shows 10.0m thick loose SAND followed by 3.0m thick medium dense SAND. The
medium dense SAND is underlain by 30.0m thick firm to stiff SILT before intersecting 0.7m
thick hard SILT. Weathered SHALE was encountered at depth of 43.7m below ground level.
WBH3 shows 4.5m thick very soft SILT underlain by 5.5m thick loose SAND. This is followed
by 3.0m thick medium dense SAND and 3.0m thick stiff SILT before intersecting hard ground
consisting of SILT/CLAY at depth of 16.0m below ground level. Weathered MUDSTONE was
later encountered at depth of 31.5m below ground level.
In reference to the existing river borehole investigation conducted earlier at the proposed bridge
location at the Batang Rajang, both of the river boreholes (EBH3 & EBH4) show a 2.5m thick
layer of soft SILT from the original ground level. The underlying loose SAND is approximate
7.5m thick on average, followed by medium dense SAND of average 2.3m thick. Alternative
layers of firm CLAY and stiff CLAY were intersected before reaching hard SILT at depth of
29.5m and 19.0m below ground level for EBH3 and EBH4 respectively.
Field and laboratory testing were carried out and the properties of soil sample are summarised
in the following sub sections.
1.2.1 Strength
The strength profile as measured by SPT-N values is shown in Figure 1.1. The soil strength
generally increases with depth. Soil with SPT N-value 50 or greater (hard layer) was
encountered ranging from 8m to 48m below existing ground depending on the boreholes.
DEPTH (m) v SPT (N)
0 10 20 SPT (N) 30 40 50
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
DEPTH (m)
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
BBH1 BBH2 BBH3 BBH4 BBH5 BBH6
DBH1 DBH2 DBH3 DBH4 DBH5 DBH6
DBH7 PBH1 PBH2 PBH3 PBH4 PBH5
PBH6 PBH7 RBH1 RBH2 WBH1 WBH2
WBH3 EBH1
Based on Figure 1.2, the laboratory test results show the average moisture content for the soil
in the first 15m depth is approximately 58.82% while it is 26.49% for the soil beyond 15m.
The moisture content of the soil in the first 15m tends to be on the high side due to high
percentage of organic matter. In addition, peat sample contains moisture content as high as
699.03%, so it is excluded from the plotting.
MOISTURE CONTENT
AVERAGE MC PERCENTAGES %
0 <15m, 58.82 100 200
0
5
10
15
20
25
DEPTH, m
30
35
40
45
50
55 AVERAGE MC
60 >15m, 26.49
65
The properties of clay/silt are tabulated in Error! Reference source not found.. The plasticity
chart of the soil is shown in Figure 1.3. Majority of the soil samples fall in the silt region with
intermediate to high plasticity.
PLASTICITY CHART
80
70
CE
60
CV
50
Plasticity Index (%)
ME
40
CH
30
CI
MV
20
CL
MH
10 MI
ML
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Liquid Limit (%)
The particle size distribution plot of the soil samples is shown in Figure 1.4Error! Reference
source not found.. From the plot, the soil on site consists of a mixture of CLAY, SILT, SAND
and GRAVEL with average contents of 16.47%, 39.67%, 42.72% and 0.92% respectively.
PERCENTAGE %
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0
10
20
DEPTH, m
30
40
50
60
70
SAND GRAVEL SILT CLAY
In general, the water table logged in the borehole logs ranges from 0m to 3.4m below existing
ground level. It should be noted that BBH2 shows the water level at 10.5m which is considered
low, thus it will be ignored due to error when taking the reading.
1.2.6 Compression Index (Cc) & Recompression Index (Cr)
The plots for the compression index, Cc and recompression index, Cr are shown in Figure 1.5.
It can be seen that the compression index ranges from 0.18 to 0.74 with average value of 0.57
and the recompression index ranges from 0.02 to 0.12 with average value of 0.07.
Cc , Cr vs Depth
Cc , Cr
0 0.25 0.5 0.75
0
Cr, Average, 0.07 Cc, Average, 0.57
2.5
5 Cc
Depth
7.5
Cr
10
12.5
15
The preconsolidation stress for all boreholes is plotted and shown in Figure 1.6. It can be seen
that the Pc ranges between 67kN/m2 to 119kN/m2.
Pc vs Depth
60 70 Pc (kN/m2) 80 90
0
BBH3
2.5 BBH4
BBH5
5 BBH6
Depth
DBH1
7.5
DBH2
DBH6
10
PBH1
PBH7
12.5
RBH1
RBH1
15
1.2.8 pH Value
The pH of the ground water collected is plotted in Figure 1.7. The water samples from the
boreholes show quite consistent pH values except for WBH3 being in the river. Higher pH of
WBH3 could be taken during the high tide due to backflow of seawater.
pH VALUES
8
7.5
7
pH
6.5
6
Average pH, 6.3
5.5
5
BBH1 BBH3 BBH4 BBH5 DBH1 DBH2 DBH4 DBH5 DBH6 DBH7 PBH2 PBH3 PBH5 PBH6 PBH7 RBH1 WBH3
Borehole
Referring to Figure 1.8, it can be seen that the chloride content in the ground water is less than
0.5 g/l. Therefore, the chloride content is considered as insignificant. Reinforcement exposed
to high concentrations of chlorides may be subjected to an undesirable level of deterioration
with time. Table 1.2 below provides a correlation of the corrosion potential of steel.
Table 1.2 Corrosion Potential of Steel Reinforcement
For the durability of the concrete, long term exposure to injurious concentration of sulphates
may subject it to an undesirable level of deterioration with time. The results from the laboratory
tests indicates that the average sulphate content is 0.004 g/l for the samples. Therefore, there is
no special grade of concrete is required in the design as per Clause 5.3.4, BS5328, Part 1
(1997)- Sulphate Class 1.
However as the bridge crossing location is subjected to saline intrusion, concrete with Silica
Fume is proposed to be used in the bridge construction.
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
BBH1 BBH3 BBH4 BBH5 DBH1 DBH2 DBH4 DBH5 DBH6 DBH7 PBH2 PBH3 PBH5 PBH6 PBH7 RBH1
Water Sample
Sulphate Chloride
The different treatment types which involves unsuitable soil removal, surcharge, PVD,
geotextile reinforcement and stabilizing berm are summarized in Table 1.3 and Table 1.4.
Typical drawings for all treatment types are presented in Appendix D.
0 1225 1225 -
1m SAND REPLACEMENT
1225 1325 100 3.20 1 1 1
4887.182 4922.182 35
PILED EMBANKMENT -
6378.202 6398.202 20
The geotechnical design criteria for this project shall follow typical JKR geotechnical criteria
(rev 3, 2011) as follows:
Description Criteria
The stability of the proposed road shall be checked against the potential slip to ensure the
proposed site is stable after fill. Both drained and undrained analysis shall be carried out. The
stability due to surcharge shall also be considered even though it is not permanent.
The slope stability shall fulfill the minimum FoS of 1.2 and 1.3 for short term and long-term
stability respectively. Stability analyses were carried out using GeoStudio SLOPE/W.
A) “Code of Practice for Strengthen/Reinforced Soils and Other Fills”, BS 8006 : 1995.
B) “Guidelines for Slope Design”, Slope Engineering Branch, Public Works Department
Malaysia, 2010.
The soil profile adopted in the design is deduced from the borehole logs presented in the SI
reports. Both drained and undrained analyses shall be carried out for slope stability check. The
soil strengths to be adopted are presented below.
The undrained shear strength for the checking of the slope stability is best represented by the
values obtained from the vane shear in soft layer of the project site. These values can be read
from the characteristic curve in Figure 1.9.
For the overburden, it is possible to estimate the undrained shear strength, Cu from the SPT
data as stated in many literatures. Toh et al. (1989), Leach & Thompson (1979) have found
good agreement for Cu = 5N (kPa).
The design parameters for the undrained analysis to be adopted are presented in Table 1.7.
Vane Shear Test
0 5 10 15 20 25
0
Cu=10kPa
4
Depth (m)
Cu=10kPa+0.2Po
10
Stiff 18.0 - 5N
Surcharge 18.5 0 30
The soil parameters adopted are based on the empirical correlation with the plasticity index of
the soil as recommended by BS 8002 or Mitchell (1993) Kulhawy and Mayne (1990) as shown
in Figure 1.. The strength to be adopted are presented in Table 1.8.
Figure 1.10 Correlation Between Drained Angle of Friction of Fine-Grained Soils and
Plasticity Index.
Stiff 18.0 25 3
Surcharge 18.5 0 30
1.5.3 Design Scenarios & Results
i. Road Embankment
The road embankment has been analysed based on different fill height for all the soil types. Different scenarios that have been analysed are
tabulated in Table 1.9.
The ground treatment is provided if the fill embankment does not meet the design criteria of FoS 1.2 for short term and 1.3 for long term. From
Table 1.9, it can be seen that the factor of safety achieved for proposed fill height with proposed treatment are greater than 1.2 and 1.3 for undrained
and undrained respectively, which have fulfilled JKR design criteria (1.2 for short and 1.3 for long term).
Please note that the design for the bridge approach, i.e. the stretch where the mainline is parallel with service road and also the piled embankment
is presented separately in the Bridge Design Calculation Report.
ii. Service Road
The stability of the service road has been assessed to make sure the road is stable after fill. Both
undrained and drained analysis has been carried out and the results are tabulated in Table 1.10.
The treatment type applies to the service road along the bridge at both Sarikei and Tanjung
Manis sides. BBH4 is selected as the worst borehole for analysing the service road along the
bridge such that the very soft soil layer is 10.10m thick. As for the treatment of road service
before piled embankment, BBH6 is adopted as it shows 10.20m soft soil layer. Although the
borehole around the piled embankment at Tanjung Manis side indicates the ground is sandy, it
is still possible that soft soil layer is present based on MP/HA11.
1 layer of geotextile
LHS Undrained 1.542
reinforcement with
minimum design
BBH6 LHS Drained 1.641
strength of 400kN/m
(worst
BH) RHS No treatment Undrained 1.019
1 layer of geotextile
RHS Undrained 1.524
reinforcement with
minimum design
RHS Drained 1.605
strength of 400kN/m
From Table 1.10, it can be seen that the factor of safety (FoS) achieved for Service Road along
the bridge is more than 1.2 and 1.3 for undrained and drained analysis respectively. Therefore,
no treatment is required.
For the service road before piled embankment, the factor of safety achieved for original design
is less than 1.2. Thus, a layer of geotextile reinforcement with minimum design strength of
400kN/m is proposed. The analysis with proposed ground treatment has been assessed and the
FoS achieved are greater than 1.2 and 1.3 for both undrained and drained analysis respectively.
iii. Roundabout
The slope stability assessment for the roundabout has also been carried out to make sure the
roundabout is stable after fill. The embankment is filled with gentle slope of 1V:4H.
The factor of safety (FoS) achieved for roundabout with normal fill gradient, i.e. 1V:2H is less
than 1.2. Thus, gentle slope gradient, 1V:4H is proposed to improve the stability of the
embankment in order to meet the design requirement.
The stability at the bridge approach has also been analyzed to make sure the stability of both
riverbanks is taken care of. The analysis also indicates the length of piled embankment required.
The bridge approach analyses are presented in Bridge Design Calculation Report.
The proposed soil treatment method aims to mitigate the post construction settlement. It is
basically filling up the existing ground level to the proposed final road level with sand fill
material at construction rate of 300mm per 2 weeks.
There is a total of 22 boreholes (excluding the river boreholes and existing boreholes) along
the project site. As the thickness of soft soil is very similar (average around 7m-8m) for the
relevant boreholes, to simplify the settlement analysis, two boreholes namely BBH6 and PBH4
were selected for consolidation settlement analysis because of the presence of peat and thick
layer of soft soil (approximately 10.2m). The consolidation settlements were analyzed based
on 2m, 3.5m and 5m (highest fill height) of fill to estimate the worst settlement condition along
the road.
1 2.0 m
3 5.0 m
No treatment
4 2.0 m
6 5.0 m
7 3.5 m
10.2m very soft soil
8 5.0 m PVD + 0.5m
Surcharge for 9
9 2.0 m
months with 3m
10 3.5 m 4.0m peat + 6m very soft soil peat removal
11 5.0 m
Manual calculation using Terzaghi’s one dimensional consolidation theory has been carried
out to estimate the ground settlement. Karl Terzaghi 1948 developed Equation 1 which is used
for computing the primary consolidation settlement.
Where,
eo = Initial Void Ratio
Lo = Consolidation Thickness (m)
σ' p = Pre-consolidation pressure (kPa)
σ' vo = Existing Overburden Pressure (kPa)
σ' vf = Final Overburden Pressure (kPa)
Cr/(1+eo) = Compressiblity index for over consolidated soil
The typical design values adopted for the consolidation settlement analysis are shown in Table
1.13.
1.6.3 Results
Table 1.14 summarises the salient features of consolidation settlement calculation results. The
detail settlement calculations are attached in Appendix C. It can be seen all the cases with no
treatment except case 1 have not fulfilled the design criteria of 5 years post construction
settlement, i.e. the total settlement >250mm, thus PVD with surcharge for 9 months is proposed.
The settlement analysis with proposed treatment has also been carried out and the results show
the post 5 years and 7 years construction have not exceeding 250mm.
Table 1.14 Consolidation Settlement Calculation Results
Year 10
Year 20
Year 30
Year 40
Year 50
Year 60
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 5
Year 7
settlement (mm) settlement (mm)
1 231 202 184 145 125 101 50 24 12 6 5 86 106 < 250mm, no treatment required.
3 1250 1116 1019 807 697 563 277 136 67 33 17 443 553
> 250mm, therefore
4 2032 909 460 128 73 38 5 1 - - - 1904 1959 PVD & surcharge for 9 months is
proposed.
5 2399 1201 691 252 154 82 11 2 - - - 2147 2245
7 51 46 43 33 28 22 10 6 2 1 - 18 23
8 79 73 66 51 44 33 15 10 4 1 1 28 36
< 250mm
9 34 8 7 5 4 2 - - - - - 29 30
with PVD & surcharge for 9 months
10 85 44 36 19 13 9 1 - - - - 66 70
11 120 69 56 31 21 12 2 - - - - 89 99
Appendix A
SI PLAN & SOIL PROFILE
EBH1
MP/HA1
DBH1
MP/HA2
LEGEND PBH1
PROPOSED DBH2
PBH BOREHOLE (PED) AT
ROAD MP/HA4
PROPOSED
DBH BOREHOLE (DED) AT PBH2
ROAD
PROPOSED MP/HA5
RBH BOREHOLE (PED) AT
BRIDGE APPROACH DBH3
PROPOSED
BBH BOREHOLE (DED) AT MP/HA6 DBH4
BRIDGE APPROACH
PBH3
PROPOSED RIVER MP/HA8
WBH
BOREHOLE (DED) MP/HA7 PBH4 MP/HA9
DBH5
MACKINTOSH PROBE
MP/HA
/ HAND AUGER MP/HA10
MP/HA11
PBH5
BBH1
BBH2
BBH3
MACKINTOSH PROBE / HAND AUGER BOREHOLE (DED) AT BRIDGE RBH1
BOREHOLE (DED) AT ROAD SETTING OUT POINT
SETTING OUT POINT SETTING OUT POINT WBH1
WBH2
COORDINATES(m) COORDINATES(m) COORDINATES(m) WBH3
POINT POINT POINT RBH2
BBH4
EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) EASTING (E) NORTHING (N) BBH5
BBH6
MP/HA1 2200820.387 5247755.723 DBH1 2200842.834 5247237.074 BBH1 2208516.335 5242514.799
MP/HA12
MP/HA2 2200980.093 5246871.665 DBH2 2201802.967 5245767.592 BBH2 2208560.948 5242403.391
EBH6
MP/HA13
MP/HA3 2201421.535 5246097.593 DBH3 2203474.387 5244567.523 BBH3 2208604.404 5242291.535
PBH6
MP/HA4 2202214.100 5245467.411 DBH4 2205388.656 5244059.480 BBH4 2208914.758 5241482.475
MP/HA5 2203084.076 5244835.573 DBH5 2207238.831 5243480.373 BBH5 2208958.183 5241370.597 MP/HA14
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? SOFT LIGHT MEDIUM GREY
CLAY
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER
? ? 0.20
0.00-0.20 NIL ? SOFT MEDIUM BROWN CLAY WITH
DECAYED MATTER AND PEAT
?
1m 1m 1m
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
2m 1.50-1.95 N=4 FIRM LIGHT SANDY CLAY 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 68 31 70.45 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 68 31 82.42 SANDY SILT WITH SOME
2.50 2.50 DECAYED MATTERS
? 3m ? MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY
? 3m 3m
3.00-3.45 N = 17 CLAYEY SAND WITH TRACES 3.00-3.45 N=1 3.00-3.45 NIL 0 1 67 32 71.11
4m 4.00 OF ROCK FRAGMENT 4m 4m VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
? VERY STIFF MEDIUM ORANGE ? VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
SANDY SILT
SANDY SILT
5m 4.50-4.95 N = 25 CLAY WITH TRACES OF ROCK 5m 4.50-4.95 N=1 0 1 66 33 74.13 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
5.50 FRAGMENT 5.50
? 6m ? HARD MEDIUM ORANGE
? 6m 6m
6.405 6.00-6.405 N = 59 6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.50 NIL
VERY SOFT LIGHT GREY
SANDY CLAY WITH SOME OF 0 24 41 35 21.71
? ROCK FRAGMENT ? 7m 7m 7.00
SLIGHTLY SANDY CLAY
12m
DENSE MEDIUM GREY SAND
? 12m ? ?
12.00- 0 100 0 23.23 12.00- 0 99 1 23.95
N = 44 N = 63
12.45 12.39
13m 13.00 13m
? 16.685 16.50-
? ? 16.58
16.50- ? ?
16.685
N = 250
DBH7 TERMINATED AT 16.685m ? 16.58
N = 600
PBH7 TERMINATED AT 16.58m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL
SOIL PROFILE 1
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 1.00
0.00-0.20 NIL
? TOO PEATY 139.12 VERY SOFT DARK BROWN PEAT
WITH ROOTS
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL TOO PEATY 304.98 VERY SOFT BROWNISH
MEDIUM GREY PEAT WITH
? ?
1m 1m 1.00 1m 1.20 ROOTS
VERY SOFT GREYISH LIGHT
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 60 39 39.42 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0
BROWN CLAY VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN TO
2.50 VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY SANDY SILT
3m 3m CLAY 3m
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 28 50 22 43.08 3.00-3.45 N=2 0 3 44 53 39.72 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 3 65 32 85.83
4m VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY 4m 4.00 4m 4.00
SANDY SILT VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=2 0 3 50 47 36.32 SANDY CLAY 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
5.50 ? 5.20
? ?
6m 6m 6m
FIRM LIGHT GREY CLAY VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
6.00-6.50 NIL 0 0 73 27 76.93 VERY SOFT GREY SILT 6.00-6.45 N=5 0 0 58 42 44.34 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 8 67 25 61.23
SANDY CLAY
7m 7.00 7m 7.00 7m
? ? ?
7.50-7.95 N=5 0 0 69 31 41.49 FIRM LIGHT GREY CLAY 7.50-7.95 N = 12 0 0 57 43 43.54 STIFF LIGHT GREY CLAY 7.50-7.95 N=0
8m 8m 8.20 8m
8.50 ? ? ? 8.50
? 9m ? 9m 9m VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY
9.00-9.45 N = 21 0 0 69 31 49.94 VERY STIFF LIGHT GREY CLAY 9.00-9.34 N = 79 9.00-9.50 NIL 2 8 66 24 62.65 SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF
10.00 HARD LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
10m 10m 10m GRAVEL
? ? SANDY CLAY
?
10.20
? ?
10.50- 0 1 67 32 20.63 10.50- 0 2 67 31 19.58 10.50- 0 1 68 31 55.26 FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
11m N = 68 11m N = 30 11m N=4
10.87 10.95 10.95 CLAY
HARD BROWN SLIGHTLY 11.50 11.50
12m SANDY CLAY 12m ? 12m ?
12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 0 66 30 4 25.82
MEDIUM DENSE GREY VERY
N = 100 N = 83 N = 14
12.30 12.33 12.45 SILTY SAND
13m 13m 13m 13.00
HARD LIGHT GREY CLAY
13.72
? 13.50-
13.72
N = 115 ? DBH6 TERMINATED AT 13.72m
? 14m 13.50-
13.81
N = 94 14m 13.50-
13.95
N = 24 8 88 4 27.99
MEDIUM DENSE GREY
BELOW GROUND LEVEL SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
15m 15m SAND WITH TRACES OF
15.285
? 15.00-
15.285
N = 111 ? ? ? 15.00-
15.45
N = 26 GRAVEL
PBH6 TERMINATED AT 15.285m 16m 16.00
BELOW GROUND LEVEL ? ? ?
17m 16.50-
N = 28
16.95 VERY STIFF MEDIUM GREY
CLAY WITH SOME SANDS
18m
18.00-
N = 27
19m 19.00 18.45
? ? ?
20m 19.50- 11 35 42 12 23.22
N = 67
19.875
21m
21.00- HARD GREY SANDY CLAY
N = 100 WITH A LITTLE OF GRAVEL
22m 21.30
(WEATHERED SILTSTONE)
23m 22.50-
N = 136
22.74
24m
13 43 31 13 18.98
24.00-
N = 100
25m 25.00 24.245
26m 25.50-
N = 125
25.74
27m
27.00- HARD GREY SANDY CLAY
N = 167
28m 27.16 WITH A LITTLE OF GRAVEL
28.50- 13 51 28 8 18.80
29m N = 214
28.64
30m 30.07
? 30.00-
N = 1500
? BBH6 TERMINATED AT 30.07m
?
30.07
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
SOIL PROFILE 2
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER ? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? DARK BROWN PEATY SILT
WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL
MEDIUM BROWN SILT WITH
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER ?
1m 1m 1m
1.20 MATTER
VERY SOFT DARK BROWN VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 TOO PEATY 227.21 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 1 60 39 85.18 VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY 2m 1.50-1.95 N=2 0 0 83 17 152.83 SOME DECAYED MATTER
PEAT WITH SOME WOODS
SANDY SILT 2.40
? 3m
2.50
? 3m
2.50
3m
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 66 34 79.67 VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 64 36 64.64 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 3 65 32 64.02
SOME WOODS VERY SOFT SLIGHTLY SANDY
4m 4.00 4m VERY SOFT GREY SILT 4m SILT WITH TRACES OF
VERY SOFT MEDIUM BROWN ORGANIC MATTER
5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0
CLAY
5.50 5.50 5.50
6m 6m 6m
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
6.00-6.50 NIL 0 13 63 24 53.94 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 16 50 34 59.02 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 0 72 28 86.09
SANDY SILT SANDY SILT TRACES OF ORGANIC MATTER
7m 7.00 7m 7.00 7m 7.00
? 10m 10.00
? ? 10m 10.10
? ? 10m 10.00
?
STIFF GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
10.50- 10.50- 1 32 48 19 53.19 10.50- 0 92 8 27.93
11m N=7 11m N = 11 SILTY WITH TRACES OF 11m N=6
10.95 10.95 10.95
11.50 GRAVEL
12m FIRM BROWNISH GREY SANDY ? 12m ? ? 12m LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
12.00- 0 28 59 13 48.07 12.00- MEDIUM DENSE DARK BROWN 12.00-
N=4 SILT N = 12 N=8 / SILTY SAND
12.45 12.45 SAND WITH DECAYED WOOD 12.45
13m
?
13m 13.00
? ? 13m
21m ? 21m
? ? 21m
0 99 1 23.48 0 2 67 31 27.73 MEDIUM DENSE BROWN
21.00- 21.00- 21.00-
N = 21 N = 22 N = 18 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
22m 21.45 22m 21.45 22m 21.45
MEDIUM DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY VERY STIFF LIGHT GREY
CLAYEY / SILTY SAND SLIGHTLY SANDY CLAY
23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 23m 22.50-
N = 29 N = 26 N = 21
22.95 23.50 22.95 23.50 22.95
? 24m
23.50
? ? 24m ? ? ? 24m
? ?
24.00- 24.00- 9 46 38 7 22.03 24.00- 1 11 65 23 27.15
N = 30 N = 32 N = 67
25m 24.45 25m 24.45 25m 24.375 HARD LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
DENSE GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SANDY CLAY WITH TRACES OF
SILTY SAND GRAVEL
26m 25.50- 26m 25.50- 26m 25.50- 2 19 62 17 22.08
N = 30 N = 55 N = 54
25.95 25.925 25.927
26.50
? 27m ? 27m 27m
26.80
38m 37.50-
N = 30
37.95
39m
39.00-
N = 34
40m 39.45
DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
SAND
41m 40.50-
N = 33
40.95
42m
42.00- 0 90 10 22.39
N = 33
43m 42.45
44m 43.50-
N = 34
43.95
? 45m
44.50
?
45.00-
N = 27
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :
45.95
46m
47m 46.50-
N = 29 SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT
46.95
48m
48.00- 0 94 6 24.48
N = 23 MEDIUM DENSE GREY CLAYEY /
49m 48.45
SILTY SAND SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE
50m 49.50-
N = 25
49.95
51m
CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE
51.00-
N = 24
52m 51.45
56m 55.50-
N = 34
55.95 NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined
DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
57m
SAND Symbols. c.g.
57.00-
N = 34
58m 57.45
silty SAND
59m 58.50-
N = 37
58.95
60m
60.45 60.00-
? 60.45
N = 36
? BBH5 TERMINATED AT 60.45m ?
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
34.50- 34.50-
35m 35m N=9 35m N = 14
34.50- 34.95 34.95
100 NIL
36.00
36m 36m 36m STIFF GREY SILT
WEAK MEDIUM GREY 36.00- 36.00-
N = 10 N = 11
36.00- 36.45 36.45
37m 100 NIL MODERATELY WEATHERED 37m 37m
37.50
AND HIGHLY FRACTURED
MUDSTONE 37.50- 37.50-
38m 38m N=9 0 4 73 23 50.93 38m N=8
37.50- 37.95 37.95
80 NIL
39.00
39m 39m 39m
39.00- 39.00-
N=9 N=9
39.00- 39.45 39.45
40m 80 NIL 40m 40m
40.50
57m 57.00
57.00-
N = 34
57.45
58m
59m
1 : 300 (A3)
62m
SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT
63m 63.00
63.40 VERY DENSE MEDIUM GREY
64m SILTY FINE SAND WITH
63.40- TRACES OF GRAVEL
30 NIL
64.90
SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE 65m
64.90-
100 NIL
66m 66.40
WEAK MEDIUM GREY HIGHLY
WEATHERED HIGHLY
CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE 67m 66.40-
NIL NIL FRACTURED SHALE
67.90
68m
67.90-
100 NIL
68.40
SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE 68.40
WBH1 TERMINATED AT 68.40m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN
PEATY CLAY WITH SOME
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? 0 0 77 23 83.94
DARK BROWN SILT WITH ? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL MEDIUM BROWN PEAT ?
1m 1.20 1m TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER 1m
DECAYED MATTER 0.70
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 0 80 20 77.61 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 0 66 34 93.82
VERY SOFT GREY SILT DECAYED WOODS
2.50 VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY 2.50
SANDY SILT WITH SOME
3m 3m DECAYED MATTER 3m
3.00-3.45 N=0
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 6 68 26 67.76 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 1 67 32 78.71 0 0 69 31 71.53
ORGANIC MATTER
4m 4m 4.00 4m 4.00
37.50- 37.50-
38m N = 86 38m N = 27
37.825 37.95
38.50
39m 39m
39.27
? 39.00-
39.27
N = 100 ? BBH3 TERMINATED AT 39.27m
? 39.00-
39.45
N = 26
0 96 4 27.33
40m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
41m 40.50- SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
N = 26
40.95 SAND
42m
42.00-
N = 28
42.45
43.00
? 43m
?
DENSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
44m 43.50-
N = 31 SAND
43.95
? 45m
44.50
?
45.00- 0 96 4 25.44
N = 28
45.95 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
46m
GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
? 47m 46.50-
N = 27
SILTY FINE SAND
?
46.95
47.50
48m
48.00-
N = 30
48.45
49m
DENSE MEDIUM GREY
50m 49.50- 0 96 4 26.19 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
N = 30
49.95
SAND
51m
51.00-
N = 32
51.45
52m
52.50
? 53m 52.50- 0 94 6 26.94
?
N = 24
52.95
54m
54.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
N = 27
54.45 GREY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
55m
SAND
56m 55.50-
N = 29
56.50 55.95
? 57m
? ?
57.00-
N = 34
57.45 DENSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
58m
SAND
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE : 59m 58.50-
SOIL PROFILE 5 ? 60m
59.50
60.00
58.95
N = 30
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL DARK BROWN PEAT
? ? 0.20
0.00-0.20 NIL MEDIUM BROWN FINE SAND
WITH SOME WOOD
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL DARK BROWN PEAT
?
1m SOFT BROWN SLIGHTLY 1m 1m
SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF SOFT LIGHT GREY SANDY
1.50-1.95 N=4 0 20 60 20 50.76 DECAYED WOOD 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 61 0 135.69 1.50-1.95 N=4 6 48 41 5 29.45 SILT WITH TRACES OF
? 2m
2.00 ? 2m
VERY LOOSE LIGHT BROWN
2m
GRAVEL
FINE SAND WITH ROOTS AND
3m 3m DECAYED MATTER 3m 3.00
LOOSE MEDIUM GREY FINE
3.00-3.45 N=8 3.00-3.45 N=0 3.00-3.45 N=0 TOO PEATY 299.65
SAND
4.00 VERY SOFT DARK BROWN
4m 4m 4.00 4m
? ? ? ? ? PEAT
7m 7m 7.00 7m 7.00
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
? ? ?
8m 7.50-7.95 N = 19 GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / 8m 7.50-7.95 N=0 0 60 27 13 19.97 8m 7.50-7.95 N=2 0 19 58 23 63.47
SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
SILTY FINE SAND WITH VERY SOFT LIGHT GREY SAND SILT
TRACES OF GRAVEL SILT 9.00
9m 9m 9m
9.00-9.45 N = 22 2 95 3 28.18 9.00-9.45 N=0 ? 9.00-9.45 N=6 ?
10m
? 10m 10.00
? ? 10m
15m
GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
SILTY SAND ? 15m
14.50
? ? 15m
15.00- 15.00- 0 100 0 18.63 15.00-
N = 26 N = 11 N=5
15.45 15.45 15.45
16.00 16.00
? 16m
? LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
16m
? 16m
?
17m 16.50- 0 98 2 27.96 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /SILTY FINE 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 0 74 21 5 24.74
N=7 N = 15 N=0
17.50 16.95 SAND 16.95 16.95
? 18m
? 18m MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY 18m
VERY LOOSE LIGHT GREY
VERY SILTY FINE SAND
18.00- 18.00- FINE SAND 18.00-
N = 10 N = 17 N=0
19m 18.45 19m 18.45 19m 18.45
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 19.50
20m 19.50-
N = 10
0 80 20 28.69 20m 19.50-
N = 23
0 100 0 22.14 ? 20m 19.50-
N = 16
0 98 2 25.33 ?
19.95 19.95 19.95
31.00
30.00-
30.45
N = 22 ? 30.45 30.00-
30.45
N = 28 ? DBH5 TERMINATED AT 30.45m
?
31m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
32m 31.50- 0 97 3 25.18
N = 24
31.95
35m 34.50-
N = 27
34.95
36m 36.00
? 36.00-
N = 34
?
36.45 DENSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
37m
GREY CLAYEY FINE SAND
37.50
? 38m 37.50- 0 94 6 30.42 ?
N = 28 MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
37.95
CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND
39.00
? 39m
39.00-
N = 31
?
39.45
40m
42m
42.00-
N = 31
42.45
? 43m 43.00
? MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM
44m 43.50-
43.95
N = 27
0 96 4 28.07 GREY SLIGHTLY CLAYEY /
SILTY FINE SAND
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :
44.50
? 45m
?
45.00-
DENSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
N = 30 FINE SAND
46m 46.00
45.45 SAND SILTSTONE TOP SOIL PEAT
47m 46.50- DENSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
N = 36
46.95 GREY CLAYEY SAND
? 48m 48.00
48.00- 0 40 40 20 31.83 ? HARD GREY SANDY SILT ? SILT DECAYED WOOD VERY SOFT - SOFT VERY LOOSE - LOOSE
N = 51
48.445
49m 49.00
? ?
50m 49.50-
N = 55
49.925 CLAY SHALE FIRM - STIFF MEDIUM DENSE
VERY DENSE BROWNISH
51m MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY SAND
51.00-
N = 63
51.39
52m
52.50-
SANDSTONE PEAT VERY STIFF DENSE - VERY DENSE
53m N = 71
52.86
54m 54.00
54.00- 0 97 3 24.44
N = 32
55m
54.45 MUDSTONE GRAVEL HARD
56m 55.50- DENSE MEDIUM GREY
N = 35
55.95 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY FINE
SAND
57m
57.00-
NOTE : Composite soil types will be signified by combined
N = 37
58m 58.00
57.45
Symbols. c.g.
59m 58.50- 0 95 5 24.39 DENSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY
N = 37
59.50
58.95 FINE SAND
silty SAND
60m DENSE BROWNISH MEDIUM
60.45 GREY CLAYEY FINE SAND
? 60.00-
60.45
N = 42 ? BBH1 TERMINATED AT 60.45m ?
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
SOIL PROFILE 6
SCALE 1 : 150 (A1)
1 : 300 (A3)
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
RQD % DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20
0.00-0.20 NIL ? DARK BROWN CLAY WITH
DECAYED WOOD
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL
? DARK BROWN PEAT ? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL
DARK BROWN CLAY WITH
DECAYED WOOD
?
1m 1m 1m
FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 TOO PEATY 340.99 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 0 66 34 111.28 2m 1.50-1.95 N=5 0 6 79 15 54.32
SILT
VERY SOFT DARK BROWN VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH
3m
PEAT
3m
ORGANIC MATTER ? 3m
2.50
? ?
3.00-3.45 N=0 3.00-3.45 N=0 3.00-3.45 N=6 0 66 23 11 34.74 LOOSE MEDIUM GREY VERY
SILTY SAND
4m 4.00 4m 4.00 4m 4.00
? ?
STIFF LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 0 0 82 18 140.00 5m 4.50-4.95 N=0 0 0 73 27 68.46 5m 4.50-4.95 N=8 0 11 64 25 62.55
VERY SOFT LIGHT BROWN SANDY SILT
6m 6m
CLAY WITH ORGANIC MATTER
? 6m
5.50
? ?
6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.45 N=0 6.00-6.45 N=7
VERY SOFT BROWN SILT WITH
7m 7m 7.00 7m
DECAYED WOODS
N=0 N=4
SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY N=7
8m 7.50-7.95 0 0 79 21 67.15 8m 7.50-7.95 0 1 76 23 76.46 8m 7.50-7.95 0 90 10 27.98
SILT WITH DECAYED WOODS
8.50 LOOSE MEDIUM GREY CLAYEY
9m 9m 9m / SILTY SAND
9.00-9.45 N=0 9.00-9.45 N=0
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH 9.00-9.45 N=9
0 0 88 12 74.87
ORGANIC MATTER
10.00 10.00
?
10m
? ?
10m
? ? 10m
12m
STIFF GREY SILT WITH
DECAYED WOODS 12m
FIRM GREY SILT WITH
DECAYED WOOD ? 12m
11.50
?
12.00- 12.00- 12.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
N=8 0 0 72 28 82.57 N=6 N = 11 0 90 10 23.99
12.45 12.45 12.45 CLAYEY / SILTY SAND
13m 13.00 13m 13.00 13m 13.00
? ? ? LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
?
14m 13.50- N=0 14m 13.50- N=7 14m 13.50- N=8 0 90 3 24.94 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
13.95 13.95 13.95 SAND
14.50
15m
DECAYED WOODS
15m ? 15m
?
15.00- 15.00- 0 23 50 27 29.53
FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY 15.00-
N=0 N=5 SILT N = 10
15.45 15.45 15.45
16m 16.00 16m 16m
? ? ? STIFF TO VERY STIFF GREY
17m 16.50-
N=7
0 0 61 39 58.73 17m 16.50-
N=7
? 17m 16.50-
N = 16
3 22 62 13 44.02 SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT WITH ?
16.95 FIRM TO STIFF MEDIUM GREY 17.50 16.95 16.95 TRACES OF GRAVEL
18m CLAY WITH DECAYED WOODS 18m 18m
0 25 55 20 30.19
FIRM LIGHT BROWN SLIGHTLY
18.00- 18.00- 18.00-
N=9 N=6 SANDY CLAY N = 19
19m 19.00 18.45 19m 19.00 18.45 19m 19.00 18.45
? ? ? ?
FIRM LIGHTLY GREY SANDY STIFF GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
20m 19.50- 0 79 18 3 19.28 20m 19.50- 1 55 25 19 31.72 20m 19.50- 0 7 69 24 53.51
N = 10 N=7 SILT WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL N=9 SILT
19.95 MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY 20.50 19.95 20.50 19.95
21m
VERY SILTY SAND ? 21m
? ? 21m ?
MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT GREY
21.00- 21.00- FINE SAND 21.00-
N = 13 N = 18 N = 17
22m 22.00 21.45 22m 22.00 21.45 22m 21.45
? ?
23m 22.50- 0 4 65 31 18.34 23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- 0 97 3 25.93
N = 53 N = 54 N = 10
22.935 22.93 HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTY 22.95
HARD LIGHT GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF
24m 24m 24m
24.00-
SANDY CLAY 4 15 47 34 19.46 GRAVEL
24.00- 24.00- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
24.395 N = 77 N = 51 N = 15
25m 25m 24.445 25m 24.45 SLIGHTLY CLAYEY / SILTY
SAND
?
25.845 25.50-
25.845 N = 56 ? DBH4 TERMINATED AT 25.92m ? ? 25.92 25.50-
25.92
N = 56 ? ? 26m 25.50-
25.95
N = 20
DBH4 TERMINATED AT 25.92m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL 27m
27.00-
N = 17
28m 27.45
30m
?
30.45 30.00-
30.45
N = 18 ? ?
PBH3 TERMINATED AT 30.45m
BELOW GROUND LEVEL
SOIL PROFILE 7
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE :
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL DARK BROWN PEAT
? ? 0.20 0.00-0.20 NIL ? 0 1 85 14 184.73
DARK BROWN SILT WITH
SOME ROOTS
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? 0 1 80 19 185.03
VERY SOFT BROWN SLIGHTLY ?
1m 1m 1m SANDY SILT WITH DECAYED
VERY SOFT DARK BROWN 1.20
VERY SOFT GREY SLIGHTLY MATTER
PEAT WITH DECAYED WOOD
1.50-1.95 N=5 TOO PEATY 699.03 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 25 63 12 63.48 SANDY SILT WITH SOME 1.50-1.95 N=0
?
2m 2.00
? 2m
2.50 DECAYED MATTERS
2m
23m 22.50- 23m 22.50- MEDIUM DENSE GREY CLAYEY 23m 22.50- 0 94 6 23.63
N = 29 N = 18 / SILTY FINE SAND N = 12
22.95 22.95 22.95
MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY
24m CLAYEY / SILTY FINE SAND 24m 24m
24.00- 24.00- 24.00-
N = 24 N = 19 N = 14
24.45 24.45 24.45
? 25m 25.00
? 25m 25m 25.00
30m
/ SILTY FINE SAND
30m
WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL
? 30m HARD GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY ?
30.45 30.45 30.45 0 17 65 18 43.46 SILT
? 30.00-
30.45
N = 32 ? DBH3 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ? ?
30.00-
30.45
N = 19 ? PBH2 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ? ? 30.00-
30.45
N = 36 ? DBH2 TERMINATED AT 30.45m ?
BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL BELOW GROUND LEVEL
SOIL PROFILE 8
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
MOISTURE
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
SAMPLING
N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%) N-VALUE PSD (%)
CONTENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
UCS
UCS
UCS
LOG LOG LOG
(%)
(%)
(%)
(m)
(m)
(m)
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
RQD %
RQD %
RQD %
TCR %
TCR %
TCR %
SAND
SAND
SAND
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
(m) (m) (m)
SILT
SILT
SILT
Reduced level : Reduced level : Reduced level :
O.G.L. O.G.L. O.G.L.
? 0.00-0.20 NIL
? MEDIUM BROWN CLAY WITH
SOME OF DECAYED MATTER
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
?
0 2 83 15 115.98 GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT
WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
? ? 0.00-0.20 NIL
?
1m 1.00 1m 1.00 1m
MATTER VERY LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
CLAYEY SAND
2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 0 3 62 35 97.46 2m 1.50-1.95 N=0 2m 1.50-1.95 N=4
VERY SOFT DARK GREY 2.50
3m SLIGHTLY SANDY SILT WITH 3m 3m
VERY SOFT GREY SILT WITH VERY LOOSE MEDIUM GREY
3.00-3.50 NIL 0 1 67 32 70.96 SOME DECAYED MATTER 3.00-3.50 NIL 0 0 74 26 78.86 3.00-3.50 N=0
TRACES OF DECAYED MATTER SAND
4m 4m 4m 4.00
? ? VERY SOFT GREY SANDY
?
5.00 4.50-4.95 N=0 4.50-4.95 N=0 4.50-4.95 N=3 CLAY WITH TRACES OF
?
5m
? ?
5m
5.50
5m
5.50 DECAYED MATTER AND WOOD
6m 6m 6m
6.00-6.50 NIL LOOSE GREY CLAYEY / SILTY 6.00-6.50 NIL 0 28 61 11 53.08 VERY SOFT SLIGHTLY SANDY 6.00-6.45 N=3
FINE SAND SILT SOFT MEDIUM GREY CLAY
7m 7m 7m
7.50 WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
7.50
? 8m 7.50-7.95 N=0 ? VERY SOFT MEDIUM GREY
? ? 8m 7.50-7.95 N=5 ? ? 8m 7.50-7.95 N=2
MATTER
9.00-9.45 N = 14 9.00-9.45 N=6 0 32 56 12 55.35 9.00-9.45 N=3 SOFT MEDIUM GREY SANDY
FIRM GREY SLIGHTLY SANDY
10m MEDIUM DENSE GREY VERY 10m 10m CLAY WITH TRACES OF
SILT
SILTY SAND DECAYED MATTER
10.50- 0 79 18 3 42.99 10.50- 10.50-
11m N = 14 11m N=8 11m 11.00 N=3
10.95 10.95 10.95
11.50 11.50
12m 12m 12m
12.00- 12.00- 1 49 42 8 46.40 STIFF GREY SANDY SILT WITH 12.00-
N = 16 N = 10 N=3
12.45 12.45 TRACES OF GRAVEL 12.45
13m MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 13m 13.00 13m
CLAYEY SAND ? ? ? SOFT MEDIUM GREY CLAY
13.50- 13.50- MEDIUM DENSE MEDIUM GREY 13.50-
14m N = 17 14m N = 18 14m N=2
13.95 13.95 SILTY FINE SAND 13.95
14.50 14.50
? 15m VERY STIFF DARK GREY ? 15m 15m
15.00- 1 36 52 11 42.64 SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF 15.00- 15.00-
N = 18 N = 26 N=2
15.45 GRAVEL AND DECAYED 15.45 15.45
? 16m 16.00
? MATTER ? 16m
?
16m 16.00
? ?
17m 16.50- 17m 16.50- 17m 16.50-
N = 20 N = 22 N=5
16.95 16.95 16.95
? 33m
32.50
? ?
33.00-
N = 13
34m 33.45
STIFF MEDIUM GREY CLAY
35m
35.50
36m
36.00-
N = 14 STIFF MEDIUM GREY CLAY
37m 36.45
WITH TRACES OF DECAYED
MATTER AND WOOD
38m
38.50
SOIL PROFILE 9 ? 39m
? ?
39.00-
N = 23 MEDIUM DENSE LIGHT
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1) 40m 39.45
ORANGE SAND
1 : 250 (A3)
41m
41.50
? 42m VERY DENSE LIGHT ORANGE
42.40 SAND
? 42.00-
42.40
N = 60
? EBH1 TERMINATED AT 42.40m
?
LEGEND : COHESIVE : NON COHESIVE : BELOW GROUND LEVEL
5 10kPa .---
1.187 -
5
--S --S
SAND FILL D
IT
0 0
- -·
V. LOOSE/ LOOS
��
....�· . ,-, ...
C:
-5 - ":: ::o- i;? - -5
C:
0 ;r
c,p "'"'" "'""'" .,.,,..,..., 0
� ,.,.
Chll'lg,, ,..., n -ca:;:!::;;� �
co co
{loNlln') ((kNhn')"n)
-
D """"'- 00
-15 - '
D
.•
Y.LOOS::ll.OOSE1!!.5
D Y,SOFT/SCFT'2 "' JO ,
FIRM
-20 I I I I I I I -20
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Distance (m)
SLOPE/W Analysis
Undrained Analysis_Roundabout.gsz
15/05/2019 1:350
5
.,
10kPa .---
1.239
- 5
SAND FILL
- i�
-
0 I
0
IW
E
- .... _,,_, -,-, ..... - ..... E
V.LOOSE I LOOSE
-5
,..., ""-"" "iii�.:;:::..._ ... -5
- -
;:;;;��
C: "" ;
Top C:
0 Cha,g• M
;:; 0
� !!l(lllm'JlmJ
�:.:. .:,;: �
co ' co
> -10 - D >
ENID-111.JMl 11!.5 00
- -10
D '"" " " V.SOFT I SOFT 2
Q) Q)
[iJ D """"'- '" ' 00
[iJ
D � 18.5 ' 00
-15 - D '"""""'
\l.lOOSEI 1a5 ' " - -15
-20 I I I I I I I -20
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Distance (m)
SLOPE/W Analysis
Undrained Analysis_Roundabout_GENTLE SLOPE GRADIENT.gsz
15/05/2019 1:350
Appendix C
CONSOLIDATION
SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 1
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
U1 5 10.20 10.20 2.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 37.00 67 2.30 66.15 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.256 29.41 0.0084 10.34 0.026 10.21
10.20 0.256
U1 5 10.2 10.2 2.04 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 37.68 67 2.30 66.83 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.259 29.41 0.0082 10.21 0.03 10.21
0.259
U1 5 10.2 10.2 2.04 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 37.68 67 2.30 66.83 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.259 29.41
0.259
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
2 m fill
Post Construction
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 2
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
U1 5 10.20 10.20 3.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 64.75 67 2.30 93.90 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.915 29.41 0.0144 13.53 0.124 12.82
10.20 0.915
U1 5 10.2 10.2 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 67.22 67 2.30 96.37 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.965 29.41 0.0129 12.82 0.12 12.82
0.965
U1 5 10.2 10.2 3.63 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 67.22 67 2.30 96.37 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 0.965 29.41
0.965
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
3.5 m fill
Post Construction
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 3
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
U1 5 10.20 10.20 5.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 92.50 67 2.30 121.65 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.417 29.41 0.0204 16.12 0.228 15.38
10.20 1.417
U1 5 10.2 10.2 5.24 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 96.91 67 2.30 126.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.486 29.41 0.0186 15.38 0.23 15.38
1.486
U1 5 10.2 10.2 5.24 18.5 15.64 9.72 29.15 96.91 67 2.30 126.06 3.000 3.00 0.700 0.744 0.120 0.438 0.071 1.486 29.41
1.486
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
5 m fill
Post Construction
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 4
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 2.00 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 37.00 28 6.30 41.38 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.276 2.26 0.1094 37.40 0.851 32.46
U1 7 6.00 6.00 2.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 37.00 67 2.55 63.25 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.162 10.18 0.0243 17.59 0.028 7.58
2.437
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 2.91 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 53.83 28 6.30 58.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.621 2.26 0.0827 32.46 0.85 32.46
U1 7 6.00 6.00 2.91 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 53.83 67 2.55 80.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.376 10.18 0.0045 7.58 0.03 7.58
2.997
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 2.91 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 53.83 28 6.30 58.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.621 2.26
U1 7 6.00 6.00 2.91 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 53.83 67 2.55 80.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.376 10.18
2.997
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
2 m fill 2 m fill
0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.50 th 0.29 0.0243 17.59 0.03 7.58 3.50 th 0.29 0.1094 37.40 0.851 32.46
4.00 th 0.10 0.0080 10.09 0.04 10.09 4.00 th 0.26 0.0983 35.37 0.93 35.37
Year 1 1.10 0.0913 34.11 0.13 34.11 Year 1 1.26 0.4733 74.77 1.96 74.77
Year 2 2.10 0.1747 47.21 0.18 47.21 Year 2 2.26 0.8483 90.01 2.36 90.01
Year 3 3.10 0.2580 57.10 0.21 57.10 Year 3 3.26 1.2233 96.04 2.52 96.04
Year 5 5.10 0.4247 71.55 0.27 71.55 Year 5 5.26 1.9733 99.19 2.60 99.19
Year 7 7.10 0.5913 81.15 0.30 81.15 Year 7 7.26 2.7233 99.90 2.62 99.90
Year 10 10.10 0.8413 89.83 0.34 89.83 Year 10 10.26 3.8483 100 2.62 100.00
Year 20 20.10 1.6747 98.62 0.37 98.62 Year 20 20.26 7.5983 100 2.62 100.00
Year 30 30.10 2.5080 99.70 0.37 99.70 Year 30 30.26 11.3483 100 2.62 100.00
Year 40 40.10 3.3413 99.96 0.38 99.96 Year 40 40.26 15.0983 100 2.62 100.00
Year 50 50.10 4.1747 100 0.38 100.00 Year 50 50.26 18.8483 100 2.62 100.00
Year 60 60.10 5.0080 100 0.38 100.00 Year 60 60.26 22.5983 100 2.62 100.00
Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.376 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 2.621 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 5
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 3.50 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 64.75 28 6.30 69.13 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 2.796 2.26 0.1875 48.93 1.368 43.55
U1 7 6.00 6.00 3.50 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 64.75 67 2.55 91.00 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.522 10.18 0.0417 23.05 0.120 14.51
3.317
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 5.02 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 92.84 28 6.30 97.22 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.141 2.26 0.1488 43.55 1.37 43.55
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.02 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 92.84 67 2.55 119.09 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.828 10.18 0.0166 14.51 0.12 14.51
3.970
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 5.02 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 92.84 28 6.30 97.22 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.141 2.26
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.02 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 92.84 67 2.55 119.09 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.828 10.18
3.970
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.00 th 0.50 0.0417 23.05 0.12 14.51 6.00 th 0.50 0.1875 48.93 1.368 43.55
6.50 th 0.24 0.0200 15.98 0.13 15.98 6.50 th 0.44 0.1645 45.78 1.44 45.78
Year 1 1.24 0.1034 36.28 0.30 36.28 Year 1 1.44 0.5395 78.58 2.47 78.58
Year 2 2.24 0.1867 48.82 0.40 48.82 Year 2 2.44 0.9145 91.50 2.87 91.50
Year 3 3.24 0.2700 58.34 0.48 58.34 Year 3 3.44 1.2895 96.60 3.03 96.60
Year 5 5.24 0.4367 72.38 0.60 72.38 Year 5 5.44 2.0395 99.25 3.12 99.25
Year 7 7.24 0.6034 81.70 0.68 81.70 Year 7 7.44 2.7895 99.91 3.14 99.91
Year 10 10.24 0.8534 90.13 0.75 90.13 Year 10 10.44 3.9145 100 3.14 100.00
Year 20 20.24 1.6867 98.66 0.82 98.66 Year 20 20.44 7.6645 100 3.14 100.00
Year 30 30.24 2.5200 99.71 0.83 99.71 Year 30 30.44 11.4145 100 3.14 100.00
Year 40 40.24 3.3534 99.96 0.83 99.96 Year 40 40.44 15.1645 100 3.14 100.00
Year 50 50.24 4.1867 100 0.83 100.00 Year 50 50.44 18.9145 100 3.14 100.00
Year 60 60.24 5.0200 100 0.83 100.00 Year 60 60.44 22.6645 100 3.14 100.00
Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.828 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 3.141 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5 m fill_No treatment_ CASE 6
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 5.00 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 92.50 28 6.30 96.88 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.138 2.26 0.2656 57.86 1.816 52.24
U1 7 6.00 6.00 5.00 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 92.50 67 2.55 118.75 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 0.825 10.18 0.0590 27.43 0.226 19.78
3.963
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 7.07 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 130.83 28 6.30 135.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.476 2.26 0.2141 52.24 1.82 52.24
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.07 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 130.83 67 2.55 157.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.144 10.18 0.0307 19.78 0.23 19.78
4.620
PEAT 2 4.00 4.00 7.07 18.5 12.00 2.00 4.38 130.83 28 6.30 135.21 6.000 6.00 11.000 7.000 - 0.583 - 3.476 2.26
U1 7 6.00 6.00 7.07 18.5 15.64 9.72 26.25 130.83 67 2.55 157.08 3.000 3.00 0.7 0.744 0.12 0.438 0.071 1.144 10.18
4.620
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
5 m fill 5 m fill
0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
8.50 th 0.71 0.0590 27.43 0.23 19.78 8.50 th 0.71 0.2656 57.86 1.816 52.24
9.00 th 0.41 0.0342 20.87 0.24 20.87 9.00 th 0.61 0.2298 53.97 1.88 53.97
Year 1 1.41 0.1175 38.75 0.44 38.75 Year 1 1.61 0.6048 81.76 2.84 81.76
Year 2 2.41 0.2009 50.55 0.58 50.55 Year 2 2.61 0.9798 92.76 3.22 92.76
Year 3 3.41 0.2842 59.82 0.68 59.82 Year 3 3.61 1.3548 97.11 3.38 97.11
Year 5 5.41 0.4509 73.32 0.84 73.32 Year 5 5.61 2.1048 99.31 3.45 99.31
Year 7 7.41 0.6175 82.33 0.94 82.33 Year 7 7.61 2.8548 99.91 3.47 99.91
Year 10 10.41 0.8675 90.45 1.03 90.45 Year 10 10.61 3.9798 100 3.48 100.00
Year 20 20.41 1.7009 98.71 1.13 98.71 Year 20 20.61 7.7298 100 3.48 100.00
Year 30 30.41 2.5342 99.73 1.14 99.73 Year 30 30.61 11.4798 100 3.48 100.00
Year 40 40.41 3.3675 99.96 1.14 99.96 Year 40 40.61 15.2298 100 3.48 100.00
Year 50 50.41 4.2009 100 1.14 100.00 Year 50 50.61 18.9798 100 3.48 100.00
Year 60 60.41 5.0342 100 1.14 100.00 Year 60 60.61 22.7298 100 3.48 100.00
Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.144 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 3.476 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during construction period
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
10.20 0.969
0.969
0.969
1.111
1.111
1.224
1.224
1.224
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
1.224
1.153
5) -0.251 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90
1.153
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
Post Construction
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 7
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 8
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
10.20 1.396
1.396
1.396
1.561
1.561
1.679
1.679
1.742
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 0.5m Surcharge for 9 months + 1m soil removal - Case 8
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
1.742
1.647
5) -0.444 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90
1.647
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
5m fill+0.5m surcharge
Post Construction
5m fill+0.5m surcharge
9.50 rd 0.26 5.50 5.50 5.24 5.24 16.04
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 9
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
10.00 1.106
1.287
1.287
1.287
1.287
1.404
1.404
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 2m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 9
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
1.404
1.404
1.319
6) -0.348 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90
1.319
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.50 th 0.29 0.0243 17.59 0.09 13.41 3.50 th 0.29 1.7500 98.89 0.566 91.59
4.00 th 0.22 0.0187 15.40 36.89 46.61 0.32 44.96 4.00 th 0.20 1.2202 96.01 0.59 94.97
4.50 th 2.08 0.1737 47.09 60.17 78.93 0.53 76.14 4.50 th 0.25 1.4702 97.82 0.60 96.76
5.00 th 4.80 0.4000 69.77 74.86 90.00 0.69 98.60 5.00 th 0.22 1.3077 96.76 0.62 99.56
7.00 th 10.34 0.8619 90.32 96.01 90.00 0.69 98.60 7.00 th 0.38 2.3077 90.00 0.57 92.61
Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level
13.00 th 20.08 1.6730 98.62 0.69 98.62 13.00 th 0.20 1.2215 96.02 0.59 96.02
Year 1 21.08 1.7563 98.91 0.69 98.91 Year 1 1.20 7.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 2 22.08 1.8396 99.06 0.69 99.06 Year 2 2.20 13.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 3 23.08 1.9230 99.14 0.69 99.14 Year 3 3.20 19.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 5 25.08 2.0896 99.30 0.70 99.30 Year 5 5.20 31.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 7 27.08 2.2563 99.46 0.70 99.46 Year 7 7.20 43.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 10 30.08 2.5063 99.70 0.70 99.70 Year 10 10.20 61.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 20 40.08 3.3396 99.96 0.70 99.96 Year 20 20.20 121.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 30 50.08 4.1730 100 0.70 100.00 Year 30 30.20 181.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 40 60.08 5.0063 100 0.70 100.00 Year 40 40.20 241.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 50 70.08 5.8396 100 0.70 100.00 Year 50 50.20 301.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Year 60 80.08 6.6730 100 0.70 100.00 Year 60 60.20 361.2215 100 0.62 100.00
Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.701 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.618 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
2m fill+1m surcharge
3.50 th 0.66 2.50 2.50 1.84 1.84 50.04
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 10
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
10.00 1.488
1.668
1.668
1.727
1.727
1.788
1.788
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 3.5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 10
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
1.788
1.788
1.721
6) -0.363 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90
1.721
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
7.00 th 0.58 0.0486 24.87 0.21 20.36 7.00 th 0.58 3.5000 100 0.654 93.17
7.50 th 0.47 0.0389 22.26 36.89 50.94 0.50 48.82 7.50 th 0.23 1.3520 97.10 0.67 95.59
8.00 th 2.26 0.1887 49.08 60.17 79.72 0.82 80.06 8.00 th 0.24 1.4185 97.50 0.69 97.66
8.50 th 5.98 0.4983 76.30 74.86 90.00 0.97 94.68 8.50 th 0.24 1.4521 97.71 0.70 99.59
10.50 th 10.34 0.8619 90.32 96.01 90.00 0.97 94.68 10.50 th 0.41 2.4521 90.00 0.64 91.74
Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level
16.50 th 13.31 1.1091 94.73 0.97 94.73 16.50 th 0.20 1.1756 95.52 0.67 95.52
Year 1 14.31 1.1925 95.71 0.98 95.71 Year 1 1.20 7.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 2 15.31 1.2758 96.49 0.98 96.49 Year 2 2.20 13.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 3 16.31 1.3591 97.14 0.99 97.14 Year 3 3.20 19.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 5 18.31 1.5258 98.09 1.00 98.09 Year 5 5.20 31.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 7 20.31 1.6925 98.68 1.01 98.68 Year 7 7.20 43.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 10 23.31 1.9425 99.16 1.01 99.16 Year 10 10.20 61.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 20 33.31 2.7758 99.91 1.02 99.91 Year 20 20.20 121.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 30 43.31 3.6091 99.99 1.02 99.99 Year 30 30.20 181.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 40 53.31 4.4425 100 1.02 100.00 Year 40 40.20 241.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 50 63.31 5.2758 100 1.02 100.00 Year 50 50.20 301.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Year 60 73.31 6.1091 100 1.02 100.00 Year 60 60.20 361.1756 100 0.70 100.00
Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.019 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.702 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 11
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
10.00 1.787
1.960
1.960
2.015
2.015
2.072
2.072
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
SCENARIO: 5m fill + 1m Surcharge for 9 months + 3m peat removal - Case 11
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
2.072
2.072
2.016
6) -0.375 m surcharge removal/ topping up to Finished Platform Level Ground water level: 0.00
m m m m kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ kN/m³ m² / yr m² / yr Cc Cr m years
z Hc Hd hf γfill γwet γdry Po ∆P Pc OCR ∆P + Po Cv Avg Cv eo Cc Cr 1+eo 1+eo Sp t90
2.016
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 th 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.50 th 0.79 0.0660 28.99 0.31 24.77 9.50 th 0.79 4.7500 100 0.715 93.97
10.00 th 0.66 0.0553 26.54 36.89 53.64 0.65 51.73 10.00 th 0.24 1.4114 97.46 0.73 96.04
10.50 th 2.56 0.2135 52.17 60.17 80.95 1.02 80.91 10.50 th 0.25 1.4752 97.85 0.74 97.83
11.00 th 6.42 0.5347 78.31 74.86 90.00 1.17 93.22 11.00 th 0.25 1.5182 98.06 0.76 99.50
13.00 th 10.34 0.8619 90.32 96.01 90.00 1.17 93.22 13.00 th 0.42 2.5182 90.00 0.69 91.32
Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level Surcharge Removal/ Topping up to Finished Platform Level
19.00 th 12.12 1.0098 93.27 1.17 93.27 19.00 th 0.19 1.1559 95.30 0.73 95.30
Year 1 13.12 1.0931 94.52 1.19 94.52 Year 1 1.19 7.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 2 14.12 1.1765 95.53 1.20 95.53 Year 2 2.19 13.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 3 15.12 1.2598 96.35 1.21 96.35 Year 3 3.19 19.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 5 17.12 1.4265 97.55 1.22 97.55 Year 5 5.19 31.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 7 19.12 1.5931 98.33 1.23 98.33 Year 7 7.19 43.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 10 22.12 1.8431 99.06 1.24 99.06 Year 10 10.19 61.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 20 32.12 2.6765 99.86 1.25 99.86 Year 20 20.19 121.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 30 42.12 3.5098 99.98 1.25 99.98 Year 30 30.19 181.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 40 52.12 4.3431 100 1.25 100.00 Year 40 40.19 241.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 50 62.12 5.1765 100 1.25 100.00 Year 50 50.19 301.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Year 60 72.12 6.0098 100 1.25 100.00 Year 60 60.19 361.1559 100 0.76 100.00
Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 1.255 m Ultimate settlement for very soft/soft clay/silt = 0.761 m
PROJECT: PROPOSED PASI ROAD TO SIBU/ TG MANIS ROAD, SARIKEI
5m fill+1m surcharge
9.50 th 1.03 5.50 5.50 4.47 4.47 50.89
Post Construction
Time (month) Settlement (m) %Consol Estimated Settlement (mm) Cummulative Settlement (mm)
* Note:
**Emb. Fill Construction (surcharge removal / topping up) = Total settlement during treatment period - surcharge
Appendix D
GROUND TREATMENT
DRAWINGS
27500 27500
5000
℄ OF ROAD
MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
O.G.L
X
1 1
1 1
PROPOSED EARTH TOE 2000 500mm SCRUBBING BELOW EXISTING "X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT GEOTEXTILE 2000 PROPOSED EARTH TOE
DRAIN TO DETAIL DRAIN IS REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED STAGE 1 (REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND SEPARATOR DRAIN TO DETAIL
ROAD IS RUNNING ACROSS THE TREATMENT SCHEDULE)
EXISTING DRAINAGE
2000
℄ OF ROAD 2000
600 600
℄ OF ROAD
EARTH FILL TO FORM COMPACTED EARTH FILL TO FORM
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. SAND FILL EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
500
15% CLAY CONTENT 15% CLAY CONTENT
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
SPOT SPOT
TURFING COMPACTED TURFING
CLOSED F.R.L SAND FILL CLOSED
TURFING TURFING
2 2
1 1
1000
1000
0.5m THICK LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE 0.5m THICK
CAPPING LAYER
STAGE 4 GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR CAPPING LAYER
A. GENERAL STAGE 1
1. THE DRAWING SHALL APPLY TO SPECIAL EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTED ON SOFT CLAY OR 1. EXCAVATE DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD AS PER THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE
PEATY GROUND. DRAWINGS.
2. THE EMBANKMENT DETAILS SUCH AS THE REQUIRED COUNTER BERM, FILLING RATE AND 2. REMOVE PEAT / SOFT SOIL TO THE DEPTH INDICATED AT THE GROUND TREATMENT
GEOSYNTHETIC DETAILS ETC SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN TABLE A. SCHEDULE.
3. O.G.L. IS THE GROUND BEFORE GROUND PREPARATION STAGE. 3. LAYING ONE LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR AS PER SPECIFICATION AT THE BASE AS
SHOWN. ALLOWANCE SHALL BE GIVEN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF GROUND.
4. F.R.L. IS THE FINISHED ROAD LEVEL AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE PROFILE DRAWINGS.
4. REPLACE THE EXCAVATED PEAT / SOFT SOIL WITH SAND FILL TO O.G.L.
5. THE DRAWING AND NOTES SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATION.
5. INSTALL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION (INCLINOMETER WHEN APPLICABLE) AS PER
6. REFER TO THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR THE EXTENT AND TYPE OF SPECIAL SPECIFICATION AT THE LOCATION INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O..
EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION.
STAGE 2
B. SETTING OUT
1. ALL SURVEY SETTING OUT SHALL BE DONE BY LICENSED SURVEYOR. 1. LAY A LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF THE SAND FILL ABOVE O.G.L AS
SHOWN.
2. ALL DRAINS AND ROAD ALIGNMENT SHALL BE SET OUT BEFORE EXCAVATION / GROUND
WORK COMMENCE. 2. CONSTRUCT 0.5m OF SAND AND WRAP THE REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AROUND IT AS
SHOWN.
C. GROUND PREPARATION
STAGE 3
1. ALL CLEARINGS WITHIN THE ROAD RESERVE LIMITS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED
BEFORE FILLING OF EMBANKMENT. 1. FORMING EARTH BUND OF 500mm HEIGHT USING APPROVED CLAYEY MATERIAL (MIN. 15%
CLAY CONTENT) ON BOTH SIDES OF THE EMBANKMENT.
2. GRUBBING OF TREES AND OTHER VEGETATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SPECIFICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED. 2. CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENT USING COMPACTED SAND FILL MATERIAL WITHIN THE EARTH
BUND WITH THE FILLING RATE AS SHOWN IN TABLE A.
3. ALL TREES AND VEGETATION GRUBBED SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SPECIFICATION.
4. OPEN DRAIN EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ALIGNMENT, STAGE 4
THE DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. OPEN DRAIN MAY
NEED TO BE CLEANSE AND DEEPEN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO 1. CONTINUE TO CONSTRUCT EARTH BUND ON BOTH SIDES WHILE FILLING THE EMBANKMENT
ENSURE EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE. WITH COMPACTED SAND FILL UP TO THE FORMATION LEVEL USING THE FILLING RATES
SHOWN IN TABLE A.
5. DURING FILLING WORKS FOR THE EMBANKMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL
THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENT AT LOCATION AND TIME INTERVALS TO BE
2. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE WITH
DIRECTED BY THE S.O.. THESE RECORD SHALL BE USED BY THE S.O. TO MONITOR THE
CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.
SUITABLE RATES OF FILLING FOR EACH LIFT.
3. SUITABLE MATERIAL AS THE ONE USED FOR STABILITY BERM CONSTRUCTION (MAX. 50%
ORGANIC CONTENT) SHALL BE SPREAD ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE COUNTER BERM AS
D. INSTRUMENTATION SHOWN (CAPPING LAYER).
1. INSTRUMENTATION READINGS SHALL BE TAKEN ON WEEKLY BASIS UNTIL THE END OF 4. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT AND TURF ACCORDINGLY.
TREATMENT PERIOD OR AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O..
LATERAL DISPLACEMENT
= 0.3
VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT
TABLE A
A1
TYPE OF EMBANKMENT
FOR EMBANKMENT FOUNDED ON SOFT
CLAY OR PEATY GROUND
℄ OF ROAD
2000 2000
500mm SCRUBBING BELOW EXISTING
"X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT DRAIN IS REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
(REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND ROAD IS RUNNING ACROSS THE
TREATMENT SCHEDULE) EXISTING DRAINAGE GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR
O.G.L
X
1 1
1 1
STAGE 1
℄ OF ROAD
2000 2000 2000 2000
2 2
1 1
STAGE 2
(FOR TREATMENT TYPE B2 & B3)
℄ OF ROAD
2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
0.5m COMPACTED SAND FILL LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
2 2
1 1
GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR
STAGE 2
(FOR TREATMENT TYPE B4 & B5)
500
SAND FILL
CLOSED 15% CLAY CONTENT 15% CLAY CONTENT CLOSED
TURFING R.L R.L TURFING
1 1
2 1 1 2
1 1
STAGE 3
8000 8000
0.5m SURCHARGE ℄ OF ROAD COMPACTED
STABILISING BERM FOR 9 MONTHS SAND FILL STABILISING BERM
SURCHARGE LEVEL
APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED SPOT SPOT APPROVED MATERIAL EXCAVATED
2 2
FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS TURFING TURFING FROM DRAIN OR ANY OTHERS
1 1
CLOSED CLOSED
TURFING R.L R.L TURFING
2 2
1 1
STAGE 4
1000
1000
0.5m THICK LOWER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE 0.5m THICK
CAPPING LAYER GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR CAPPING LAYER
UPPER REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE
STAGE 5
STAGE 1 1. CONTINUE TO CONSTRUCT EARTH BUND ON BOTH SIDES WHILE FILLING THE EMBANKMENT
NOTES: WITH COMPACTED SAND FILL UP TO THE FORMATION LEVEL USING THE FILLING RATES
SHOWN IN TABLE B.
1. EXCAVATE DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD AS PER THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE
DRAWINGS. 2. CONTINUE TO FILL UP TO SURCHARGE LEVEL BY USING APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL.
A. GENERAL
2. REMOVE PEAT / SOFT SOIL TO THE DEPTH INDICATED AT THE GROUND TREATMENT
1. THE DRAWING SHALL APPLY TO SPECIAL EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTED ON SOFT CLAY OR SCHEDULE. 3. WAITING FOR SURCHARGE PERIOD AS SHOWN IN TABLE B.
PEATY GROUND.
3. LAYING ONE LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR AT THE BASE AS SHOWN. ALLOWANCE 4. PERIODIC TOPPING UP OF THE FILL TO THE SURCHARGE LEVEL SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS
2. THE EMBANKMENT DETAILS SUCH AS THE REQUIRED SURCHARGE LEVEL, STABILISING SHALL BE GIVEN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF GROUND. REQUIRED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O. OR WHEN THE FILL HAS SETTLED MORE THAN
BERM, WAITING PERIODS, FILLING RATE AND GEOSYNTHETIC DETAILS ETC SHALL BE AS 0.3m.
SHOWN IN TABLE B. 4. REPLACE THE EXCAVATED PEAT / SOFT SOIL WITH SAND FILL TO O.G.L..
6. REFER TO THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR THE EXTENT AND TYPE OF SPECIAL S S 2. SUITABLE MATERIAL AS THE ONE USED FOR STABILITY BERM CONSTRUCTION (MAX. 50%
EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION. ORGANIC CONTENT) SHALL BE SPREAD ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE STABILISING BERM AS
S S 0.87'S'
S SHOWN (CAPPING LAYER).
SAND REPLACEMENT
C. GROUND PREPARATION TYPE OF EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT FOR EMBANKMENT
PVD AT 'S' m c/c
GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT FOUNDED ON SOFT
1. ALL CLEARINGS WITHIN THE ROAD RESERVE LIMITS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED TRIANGULAR GRIDS CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT CLAY OR PEAT
BEFORE FILLING OF EMBANKMENT. PVD DETAIL GROUND GROUND GROUND GROUND GROUND
2. GRUBBING OF TREES AND OTHER VEGETATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SPECIFICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED.
STAGE 2
SAND REPLACEMENT (X) REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE
3. ALL TREES AND VEGETATION GRUBBED SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1. LAY A LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF THE SAND FILL ABOVE O.G.L AS
SPECIFICATION. SHOWN (EXCEPT TREATMENT TYPE B1).
GEOTEXTILE ULTIMATE TENSILE
22kN/m 22kN/m 22kN/m 22kN/m 22kN/m
4. OPEN DRAIN EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ALIGNMENT, 2. CONSTRUCT 0.5m OF SAND AND WRAP THE REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AROUND IT AS SEPARATOR STRENGTH (AVG)
THE DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. OPEN DRAIN MAY SHOWN. (FOR TREATMENT TYPE B2, B3, B4 & B5).
NEED TO BE CLEANSE AND DEEPEN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO
3. FOR TREATMENT TYPE B4 & B5, ADDITIONAL LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE IS SHORT TERM TENSILE
ENSURE EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE. NONE 200kN/m 400kN/m 400kN/m 400kN/m
REQUIRED AFTER THE 1ST 500mm SAND FILL. STRENGTH
LOWER REINFORCING
5. DURING FILLING WORKS FOR THE EMBANKMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL
4. nd
CONSTRUCT 0.5m OF SAND ON TOP OF THE 2 LAYER OF REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AND
GEOTEXTILE
THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENT AT LOCATION AND TIME INTERVALS TO BE 120 YEARS LONG TERM
DIRECTED BY THE S.O.. THESE RECORD SHALL BE USED BY THE S.O. TO MONITOR THE WRAP THE REINFORCING GEOTEXTILE AROUND IT AS SHOWN. (FOR TREATMENT TYPE B4 & NONE 97kN/m 190kN/m 190kN/m 190kN/m
TEXTILE STRENGTH
SUITABLE RATES OF FILLING FOR EACH LIFT. B5).
PVD MINIMUM DISCHARGE CAPACITY (KINKED) 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s 90 x 10-6 m3/s
PVD LENGTH SET OR MAX. PVD DEPTH OF 'N' ('N' REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE)
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY DRAINAGE ACROSS EMBANKMENT FILL WHERE
NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
TYPE OF EMBANKMENT FOR SERVICE ROAD 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AND / OR TRAFFIC DIVERSION
WORKS FOR TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION.
3. REFER TO ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR FINISHED ROAD LEVELS.
4. UPON MATURITY OF THE WAITING PERIOD OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O. TRIM THE EMBANKMENT TO THE
SAND REPLACEMENT (X) REFER TO GROUND TREATMENT SCHEDULE FORMATION LEVEL. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE
WITH CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.
GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (AVG) 22kN/m 5. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT AND TURF ACCORDINGLY.
6. THE SERVICE ROAD MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PARALLEL WITH THE MAIN ROAD.
℄ OF ROAD
500
500
CLOSED TURFING 2 1 1 2
1 1 CLOSED TURFING
600 600
1000
1000
1 1
1 1
"X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT 2000
2000
(REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND 0.5m THICK CAPPING LAYER PROPOSED EARTH TOE
PROPOSED EARTH TOE 0.5m THICK CAPPING GEOTEXTILE REINFORCING PVD AT 1.5m c/c TREATMENT SCHEDULE) TO BE APPLIED AFTER THE DRAIN TO DETAIL
DRAIN TO DETAIL LAYER TO BE APPLIED SEPARATOR GEOTEXTILE TRIANGULAR GRIDS GROUND TREATMENT OF
AFTER THE GROUND MAIN ROAD
TREATMENT OF MAIN
ROAD
TREATMENT FOR MAIN ROAD & SERVICE ROAD BEFORE OR AFTER BRIDGE APPROACH SPAN
SCALE 1 : 125 (A1)
1 : 250 (A3)
℄ OF ROAD
EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM EARTH FILL TO FORM
EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN. EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
15% CLAY CONTENT F.R.L 15% CLAY CONTENT 15% CLAY CONTENT F.R.L 15% CLAY CONTENT
2 2 2 2
CLOSED CLOSED
1 1 CLOSED CLOSED 1 1
TURFING TURFING
TURFING TURFING
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
2000 2000 2000 2000
PROPOSED EARTH TOE GEOTEXTILE "X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT "X"m OF SAND REPLACEMENT GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED EARTH TOE
SEPARATOR (REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE (REFER TO REMARKS AT GROUND SEPARATOR
DRAIN TO DETAIL LINED DRAIN TO DETAIL DRAIN TO DETAIL
TREATMENT SCHEDULE) LINED DRAIN TO DETAIL TREATMENT SCHEDULE)
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY DRAINAGE ACROSS EMBANKMENT FILL WHERE
NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
TYPE OF EMBANKMENT FOR ROUNDABOUT
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AND / OR TRAFFIC DIVERSION
WORKS FOR TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION.
3. REFER TO ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWINGS FOR FINISHED ROAD LEVELS.
SAND REPLACEMENT (X) 1m SAND REPLACEMENT 4. PERIODIC TOPPING UP OF THE FILL TO THE SURCHARGE LEVEL SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS REQUIRED OR
AS DIRECTED BY THE S.O. OR WHEN THE FILL HAS SETTLED MORE THAN 0.3m.
5. UPON MATURITY OF THE WAITING PERIOD OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE S.O. TRIM THE EMBANKMENT TO THE
GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (AVG) 22kN/m FORMATION LEVEL. THE TOP 300mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDANCE
WITH CLAUSE 2.2.7 OF SSRW.
ROUNDABOUT
INNER ISLAND (REFER TO TYPICAL ROUNDABOUT CROSS SECTION) MIN. 2500
5000
℄ OF ROAD
MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
COMPACTED 0.5m SURCHARGE
SPOT PROPOSED 600mm FOR 9 MONTHS SPOT
SAND FILL EARTH FILL TO FORM
TURFING WIDE RC DRAIN SURCHARGE LEVEL TURFING EARTH BUND WITH MIN.
F.R.L 600 15% CLAY CONTENT
4
1
500
CLOSED TURFING
2
1
2000
PROPOSED EARTH TOE
GEOTEXTILE 1m SAND REPLACEMENT PVD AT 1.5m c/c
DRAIN TO DETAIL
SEPARATOR TRIANGULAR GRIDS
ROUNDABOUT
(REFER TO TYPICAL ROUNDABOUT CROSS SECTION)
7500
500
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
MAX.
2 2
500
1 1
2000 2000
EXISTING EARTH DRAIN
PVD AT 1.5m c/c
TRIANGULAR GRIDS EXISTING EARTH DRAIN
GEOTEXTILE 1m SAND REPLACEMENT BENCHES TO FORM STABLE KEY 1m SAND REPLACEMENT GEOTEXTILE
SEPARATOR SEPARATOR