Tang 1972
Tang 1972
- $CHj Lif
I11 IV
i 11
duction would demand not only a preferred direction
(10) Obtained from young (90 day) C. acuminata plants by Dr. G. of hydride attack (axis a or b) but also a single enone
Sheriha. These plants were grown from seeds kindly provided by
Mr. R. L. Smith and Dr. R. Perdue of the U. S . Department of Agricul- conformation. Therefore, it is not sufficient merely to
ture. choose a group R of sufficient steric bulk to block ap-
Cyril Tang, Henry Rapoport*
proach along axis b, but it is also necessary to control
Department of Chemistry, Unicersity of California
the enone conformation as s-cis in order to direct the
Berkeley, California 94720 formation of 1 5 s alcohol.
In an earlier phase of this work1a the derivatives I
Receiued August 30, 1972 and I1 were prepared in which R = p-phenylbenzoyl,
and it was found that this protecting group was ad-
vantageous since (1) the intermediates in the synthesis
Efficient Generation of the 1 5 s Configuration in were nicely crystalline, (2) the 1 5 s and 15R forms of I1
Prostaglandin Synthesis. Attractive Interactions in were readily separable by chromatography, and (3) the
Stereochemical Control of Carbonyl Reduction ultraviolet chromophore simplified analytical and
Sir: chromatographic work. It was subsequently dis-
covered la that the reduction of I, p-phenylbenzoyl,
One of the most fascinating problems in the area of favored formation of 1 5 s alcohol to a larger degree
prostaglandin synthesis has been the development of than was observed with screening groups at C-11, e.g.,
synthetic approaches which control stereochemistry, R = CH,(CH?),CO. Using the reagent IV'" in tetra-
particularly at C-15. We have been interested for hydrofuran-ether-pentane at - 120 to - 130", it was
some time in devising a method to effect the conversion possible to convert I, R = p-C6HjC6H4C0,to a mix-
of I to I1 (15S), with high stereoselectivity. This com- ture of 15.5 and 15R alcohols in a ratio of 82:18.1a14,5
munication reports a rational attack on this problem.
(3) See K. Noack and R . N. Jones, Can. J . Chem., 39,2225 (1961).
( 1 ) See, for example: (a) E. J. Corey, S . M. Albonico, U. Koelliker, (4) The reagent IV is superior to all other trialkylborohydrides which
T. I<. Schaaf, and R. I(. Varma, J . Amer. Chem. Soc., 93, 1491 (1971); have been tested so far for the selective formation of (15S)-II. The
(b) C. J. Sih, R. Price, R . Sood, R. G. Salomon, G. Peruzzotti, and M. following reagents of the type R1R?R3BH-Li+have been found to give
Casey, ibid., 94, 3643 (1972); (c) E. J. Corey and T. Ravindranathan, the l5Sjl5R ratios indicated: dicyclohexyl-tert-butyl (59,'41); dlcyclo-
ibid., 94, 4013 (1972); (d) E. J. Corey and P. L. Fuchs, ibid., 94, 4014 hexyltrityl (64,'36); diisopinocamphenenylmethyl (68,'32); triphenyl
(1972); (e) J. Fried, J. C. Sih, C. H. Lin, and P. Dalven, ibid., 94, 4343 (67133); tri-exo-2-norbornyl (59/41); diisobutyl-tert-butyl (74!26);
(1972); (f) R. Pappo and P. W. Collins, TefrahedronL e u . , 2627 (1972). di-sec-butyIthexyl(80:20); tri-see-butyl(78 22). In addition, IV yielded
(2) Prostanoic acid numbering. considerably higher ratios of 15S,'15R I1 than did various cvclic boro-