FINSL
FINSL
B Dead Load:
The dead to as of various members of the bridge for the design of superstructure, substructure and
foundation have been adopted as per the relevant IRC codes and Indian Standards.
Sr. No. Material Unit weight KN/m3
a Reinforced Concrete 24
b Plain Concrete 22
c Structural Steel 785
d Dry Density of Soil 18
e Saturated Density of Soil 20
C Superimposed Loads :
Wearing Coat : Provision for 75 mm bituminous wearing Coat
Crash Barrier : 2.8 KN/m on each side
D Live Loads:
Design Load (CL 207.4 IRC 6)
One lane of Class A considered to occupy 2.3 m.The remaining width of carriageway shall be loaded
with 500.00 Kg/Sqm
E Longitudinal Forces:
Following effect is considered in the design:
a Breaking forces as per the provision of Cl.214 of IRC: 6. -2000
Distribution of longitudinal forces due to horizontal deformation of bearings/ frictional resistance
b
offered to the movement of free bearings as per Cl.214.5 of IRC: 6-2000.
F Horizontal Forces due to water currents:
Portion of bridge which may be submerged in running water is designed to sustain safely the
horizontal pressure due to force of current as per the stipulations of Cl.213 of IRC: 6-2000
G Earth Pressure Forces:
Earth pressure forces are calculated as per the provision of Clause 217 of IRC: 6 assuming the following
soil properties:
Type of soil assumed for backfilling: As per Appendix 6 of IRC: 78 with dry density of 18 KN/m3 and
submerged density of 20 KN/m3.
Where Ø is the base angle of internal friction of substrata under the foundations. Live load surcharge is
considered as per the provisions of Clause 217.1 of IRC: 6 i.e. equivalent of 1.2m height of earth fill in
case of abutments and equivalent of 1.2m height of earth fill in case of return/wing walls.
H Seismic Effect:
As per Clause 222 IRC: 6-2000
Proposed Bridge is Seismic zones IV
I Temperature Effect:
The bridge structure / components i.e. bearings and expansion joints are designed for a temperature
variation of + 250 C considering moderate climate condition.
J Load Combination:
All members were designed to sustain safely the most critical combination of various loads and forces
that can coexist. Various load combinations as relevant with increase in permissible stresses are
considered in the design as per Clause 202 of IRC: 6-2000 and Clause 706 of IRC: 78.
The concrete parts are designed by working stress method. In addition, the stability of bridge resting
on tarpaper bearings is checked under on span dislodged condition. The load case relates to
seismic/wind load combinations.
Design moments, shear forces and joint displacements are worked out using Staad Pro 2007, based on
which structural design of various elements and checking of adequacy of different section is done.
The span arrangement consists of 1X25m centers to center of the abutment. The proposed bridge is a
two-lane bridge. A clear carriageway width of 4.5 m for single lanes without footpath an outer to
outer width of 5.5 m. A cross fall of 2.5% on the carriageway is provided for proper drainage.
i) Superstructure
RCC girder with the deck slab. The overall depth of the RCC girder is 2.4m depth.
ii) Substructure and Foundation
Open foundations are proposed for the bridge. The depth of the foundation shall be minimum 1.5m
below the rock line level subject to confirmation of soil investigation report. The Safe Bearing Capacity
at the founding level is taken as 300 KN/sq.m. The minimum embedment of foundation in the rock
shall be as per IRC.
iii) Bearings
Elastomeric bearings are proposed.
iv) Expansion Joint
Elastomeric slab seal joints are proposed for bridges with RCC T beam superstructures. These types of
joints shall conform to Clause 1207.2.5 of MORT&H Specification for Road & Bridge Works
(4thRevision).
v) Drainage Spout
Gl drainage spouts with Cl MS grating and PVC down take pipes at each pier locations proposed.
vi) Return wall
Return wall are proposed with length satisfying criteria of gradient 1: 1.50 with ground level.
vii) Wearing Coat
Bituminous wearing coat comprising of 50 mm thick bituminous macadam overlaid by 20 mm thick
premix carpet with 5 mm thick seal coat Type B
SUMMARY OF COST FOR BRIDGE OVER GHATEY KHOLA
Sr. No. Description Amount (Rs)
Span Arrangement = 1x25
1 Foundation and Sub-structure 3,902,475.01
2 Sub Structure 10,128,926.26
3 Super Structure 23,894,768.39
4 Carriage cost 973,648.22
5 River Training work 841,371.00
6 Others 178,417.00
7 Grand Total 39,919,605.87
Say 39,919,606.00
39,919,606.00
683290489.xls 1 5
COST ESTIMATE
SOR
Item Rate Quantity
referen Description Unit Abutment
No. (Rs)
ce
A Foundation
1.0 11.1 Earthwork in excavation for structures as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including
setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and
disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with excavated
suitable material.
I. Ordinary soil
(i) Upto 3 m depth cum 192.92 1725.36 1725.36
(ii) 3 m to 6 m depth cum 248.04 228.10 228.10
II. Ordinary rock (not requiring blasting) Upto 3 m depth cum 275.60 342.14 342.14
III. Hard rock (blasting prohibited) cum 672.84 106.22 106.22
IV. Hard rock (blasting prohibited) cum 672.86 106.22 106.22
2.0 11.3 Filling annular space around footing in rock as per technical specification Clause 1203.4.3.
P.C.C grade M 15 (Nominal mix 1:2.5:5) cum 5370.74 11.60 11.60
3.0 11.4 Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundations complete as per drawings and
technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203
iii) Granular Surface Treated with Primer sqm 19.18 146.52 146.52
13.0 5.60 Dense Graded Bituminous Macadam (Providing and laying dense bituminous macadam with 100-120
TPH batch type HMP producing an average output of 75 tonnes per hour using crushed aggregates of
specified grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.0 to 4.5% by weight of total mix of mix and filler,
transporting the hot mix to work site, laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor control to the
required grade, level and alignment, rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to achieve
the desired compaction as per MoRTH specification clause No. 507 complete in all respects.)
332856.45
56576.93
94294.89
71465.70
71467.82
62300.58
91161.39
924336.62
2198014.62
3902475.01
Amount
(Rs)
2440768.68
5404750.74
1215948.00
703123.62
113660.01
250675.20
10128926.26
Amount
(Rs)
350872.04
21548800.00
690462.60
327119.25
20588.00
43127.24
557070.35
155772.32
1817.37
57694.23
Amount
(Rs)
28391.40
4679.85
2810.25
62498.93
43064.57
23894768.39
Carriage of Materials
SOR Unit of Total Unit Carriage
Description Unit Quantity Rate in Rs Amount in Rs
reference requirement quantity weight distance
3
SOR Unit of Total Unit Carriage
Description Unit Quantity Rate in Rs Amount in Rs
reference requirement quantity weight distance
Dense Graded Bituminous Macadam (Bitumen) MT 0.098 5.86 0.57 116.56 66.95
Dense Graded Bituminous Macadam (Filler) MT 0.044 5.86 0.26 116.56 30.06
Bituminous Concrete (Bitumen) MT 0.118 3.66 0.43 116.56 50.38
Bituminous Concrete (Filler) MT 0.045 3.66 0.16 116.56 19.21
5/1.10 Cost of Haulage Excluding Loading and Unloading
3
QUANTITY CALCULATION FOR ABUTMENT WALL AND RETURN WALL
Design Data:
Number of spans = 1
Span Length = 15.56 m
Centre to Centre of span length = 15.00 m
Number of traffic lanes = 1
Overall width of carriageway = 4.5 m
Overall width bridge = 5.5 m
Road Crest Level = 1313.000 m
Percentage of camber = 2.50 %
Depth of RCC T beam = 1.400 m
Vertical Clearance = 2.544 m
Soffit level = 1311.544 m
Bottom Level of bearing (Top of pedastal) = 1311.448 m
Top level of abutment cap = 1311.248 m
Bottom of abutment cap = 1310.673 m
H.F.L = 1309.000 m
SDR level = 1304.000 m
Existing groung level = 1315.000 m
Top of footing = 1303.500 m
Founding level = 1302.000 m
Number of main girders = 4
Width of cap excluding dirt wall = 1.07 m
Length of bearing = 0.5 m
Width of bearing = 0.4 m
Thickness of bearing = 0.096 m
Depth of bearing pedastal = 0.2 m
Depth of abutment cap = 0.575 m
Depth of abutment wall = 11.000 m
Number of bearings per support = 1
Wearing coat thickness = 0.056 m
Thickness of return wall = 0.5 m
Bearing capacity of bed rock = 300 KN/m2
Foundation strata Weathered rock
Angle of Skew q = 0 Degree
Cos q = 1 Sin q = 0
Length of span skew = 15.56 m
Length of abutment wall = 5.5 m
Rare slope of stem wall with respect Vertical = 0 Degree
4
Abutment Figure
4860 3500 300 FRL 1313.000
e
500 300 300 1456
180 300
c
300 300 750
3000 f 300 CAP-TL 1311.248 296
1370 300 575
4500 4200 b
275 a 600 275
320 450
g
12000 15000
7173
EGL 1315.000
HFL 1309.000
SDRL 1304.000
4
Sr.No. Description Unit Nos. Length Width Depth Quantity
M25 grade concrete for
footing Cum 130.35
Steel @ 200 kg /Cum MT 26.07
Back fill with filter
5
media Cum 2 4.500 0.600 15.000 81.00
Back fill with granular
6
media Cum 2 4.500 4.200 14.300 540.54
7 Dirt Wall M25 Cum 2 5.500 0.300 1.696 5.597
4
QUANTITY CALCULATION FOR SUPER STRUCTURE
Design Data: No of span
Span Length = 1 25.0 m
Span Length = 0 0.0 m
Overall width of carriageway = 4.5 m
Overall width bridge = 5.5 m
Sr.No. Description Unit Nos. Length Width Depth Quantity
1 RCC Railing M25 Rm 2 32.56 65.12
2 Kerb M30 Cum 2 32.56 0.54 0.30 10.50
3 Drainage spout No 2 5.00 10.00
4 Water Bound Macadam Cum 1 32.56 4.5 0.15 21.98
5 Wet Mix Macadam Cum 1 32.56 4.5 0.075 10.99
6 Prime Coat Sqm 1 32.56 4.5 146.52
7 Tack Coat Sqm 1 32.56 4.5 146.52
Dense Graded Bitiminous
8 Cum 1 32.56 4.5 0.040 5.86
Macadam
9 Bitiminous Concrete Cum 1 32.56 4.5 0.025 3.66
10 RCC Slab ( M 30) cum 1 25.0 5.5 0.22 30.25
11 Approach Slab ( M 30) cum 2 2.5 5.5 0.22 6.05
12 Total Quantity M25 Concrete Cum 5.69
13 Total Quantity M30 Concrete Cum 40.75
14 Girders and Bracing MT 54.34
15 Steel @ 200 kg/Cum for RCC MT 8.15
5
Longitudnal Girder
Length in Depth in
Sr.No Description
mm mm
Width Density Weight
1 Top flange 25 0.032 0.4 7850 2512
Bottom Flange 25 0.036 0.6 7850 4239
Web 25 1.062 0.012 7850 2501.01
Length in Depth in
Sr.No Description
mm mm
Width Density Weight 45281.811
1 Top flange 5.5 0.016 0.3 7850 207.24 9056.362
Bottom Flange 5.5 0.016 0.3 7850 207.24 54338.17
Web 5.5 0.798 0.012 7850 413.4438
8250
ANNEX A
Cost Estimate For Steel Girder And Its ACESSORIES OF 70R LOADING
Name of work: Construction of 25m span Pridge over Ghatey Khola Namchi South Sikkim
4160000
748800
21548800
DRAINAGE WORK
3 Cost of Haulage for Non-Stock materials Excluding Loading and Unloading (Sand)
V. I. 1 0.14 60 cum 8.40
8.40
1.84 8.40 Tonne 15.456
(b) Stone
V. I. 1 0.309 60 cum 18.54
cum 18.54